This racket is great for doubles, particularly serve and volley. The control is second to none and it whips through quickly on the serve. I've added 5g to the but cap and a gram at 3&9 for that little bit of extra stability when dealing with drives at the net.
Question for ATT and Alex- Do you think this racquet is a copy or near copy of new Head Prestige Pro? Apart from weight and the Prestige make and tradition would they be similar?
I played with the cx 200 95 18x20 for 2 yrs.I really liked it although I had similar issues with it- not enough power especially on the dirt.However,as you have said about the 16x19; great feel on the slice backhand& all around good feel off the strings.Althuogh I'm changing to the Head Extreme Tour,I kept my cx 200 18x20 s& I might go back.
Did you modify the racquet at all? I heard that the racquet is kind of like a blank prostock off the shelf, intentionally lightweight with the intention of giving players room to weight it up to spec.
You're right in pointing out that it's a great base racket to then customise to your liking. However, Alex was using a frame without customisations in this video. ATT x
SX 300 Tour v CX 200 v CX 400 Tour? I’m looking to move on from Blade 98. I’ve been working into the 16x19 string pattern over the past half year. I’m a 56 year old, all court player, big serve, bigger forehand. Looking for controllable power in an off the shelf stick. Your thoughts please!
The closest to the wilson blade is de cx 200 in terms of control, thiner beam, not quite a difference related to de string pattern, and confort, it is supossed the sx to be the contest to the babolats aero and drive, oriented to generate spin and the cx 400 is a raquet power
This racket is great for doubles, particularly serve and volley. The control is second to none and it whips through quickly on the serve. I've added 5g to the but cap and a gram at 3&9 for that little bit of extra stability when dealing with drives at the net.
1 gram total at 3 & 9 or 1 gram at each side? Thx
@@glademaster one at each side. Two in total. Whippy yet stable.
Super video and well put together. We want video of you melting some forehands with it :)
Question for ATT and Alex- Do you think this racquet is a copy or near copy of new Head Prestige Pro? Apart from weight and the Prestige make and tradition would they be similar?
I played with the cx 200 95 18x20
for 2 yrs.I really liked it although
I had similar issues with it- not enough power especially on the dirt.However,as you have said about the 16x19; great feel on the
slice backhand& all around good feel off the strings.Althuogh I'm
changing to the Head Extreme Tour,I kept my cx 200 18x20 s& I might go back.
i tried the 200 tour 18 20, tour 16 19, and the 200 at 98 sq in. strangely i liked the 95 18 x 20 and the 98 more than the 95 16 x 19
What strings and tension better for Cx200?
Did you modify the racquet at all? I heard that the racquet is kind of like a blank prostock off the shelf, intentionally lightweight with the intention of giving players room to weight it up to spec.
You're right in pointing out that it's a great base racket to then customise to your liking. However, Alex was using a frame without customisations in this video. ATT x
Safin played with a Dunlop?
Seems very similar to a Wilson Pro Staff 97.
SX 300 Tour v CX 200 v CX 400 Tour?
I’m looking to move on from Blade 98. I’ve been working into the 16x19 string pattern over the past half year. I’m a 56 year old, all court player, big serve, bigger forehand. Looking for controllable power in an off the shelf stick. Your thoughts please!
The closest to the wilson blade is de cx 200 in terms of control, thiner beam, not quite a difference related to de string pattern, and confort, it is supossed the sx to be the contest to the babolats aero and drive, oriented to generate spin and the cx 400 is a raquet power
great!
Saya tidak percaya ia boleh menjadi sebaik ini