Pricing and Valuation of Forward Commitments (2024 Level II CFA® Exam -Derivatives-Module 1)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024

Комментарии • 23

  • @anthonyikedakolar9375
    @anthonyikedakolar9375 2 года назад +3

    Thank you Professor!

    • @analystprep
      @analystprep  2 года назад

      You are welcome! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a review here: trustpilot.com/review/analystprep.com

  • @naman9696
    @naman9696 2 года назад +10

    shouldn't you use 115 in the example @ 19:00

  • @ASMRGEMSTON
    @ASMRGEMSTON Год назад

    1:03:49 missing a [ in formula
    very helpful video, helps me a lot! thanks

  • @scottmorrison474
    @scottmorrison474 2 года назад +2

    At 21:00 believe the calculation is being done as if the forward prices 130 and 132 are underlying prices.
    The way I read the question, I am instead taking the $2 difference at time T and discounting to time t. I ended up with 1.94 as my value of the long position

  • @tejasvibrar1022
    @tejasvibrar1022 2 года назад +3

    Thank you so much for all your videos Prof! Do you know when Reading 35/Alternative Investments videos will be posted?

  • @MuhammadAli-ym4oq
    @MuhammadAli-ym4oq 10 месяцев назад

    At 45.25 the question states spot price 100 whereas taken as 110 in the solution for computation of FP

  • @AmirTaghaboni
    @AmirTaghaboni Год назад +1

    Can you expand on Jibor a bit more please?

  • @jonathansouza7102
    @jonathansouza7102 2 года назад

    very good! thanks

  • @giovanniberardi4134
    @giovanniberardi4134 3 месяца назад

    interest rate swaps: is the swap rate the same as the par yield?

  • @7jcjg
    @7jcjg Год назад +1

    @45:32, why do we calculate future price as time=120 instead of t=200 which is the expiry date of the contract? its just a change in time thing, so the answer can be found by adjusting the time value of the result, but on a test this would have to be clearly stated what future time we are pricing at... why would we price at t=120 when that is neither today's date to PV the price, or the contract date t=200 when the contract expires.

  • @abdullahnarejo1259
    @abdullahnarejo1259 7 месяцев назад

    how do you determine the floating party going to lose!

  • @tejasvibrar1022
    @tejasvibrar1022 2 года назад +2

    I believe the counterparties are reversed @ 34:35, won't a fixed receiver benefit when the market price is below the forward price?

  • @henricamayo3160
    @henricamayo3160 9 месяцев назад +1

    Hardest module in the curriculum

  • @7jcjg
    @7jcjg Год назад +1

    @1:03:03 would be useful to know where the 0.8163 came from to convert USD to EUR notional, given the calculation is shown nowhere and the spot exchange rate was never given...

  • @castafinance
    @castafinance 3 месяца назад

    34:51 your slide is wrong

  • @abdullahnarejo1259
    @abdullahnarejo1259 7 месяцев назад

    sir why is you annualizing the fix swap rate is not it annualized in DF?

    • @LordDockerton
      @LordDockerton 3 месяца назад

      DF is the actual change in value used for computation. Annualizing is a notation convention

  • @erickstanza8782
    @erickstanza8782 10 месяцев назад

    The wording of the question is poor at 19mins. You refer to the “contract” when you should actually be saying “the underlying”

  • @erickstanza8782
    @erickstanza8782 10 месяцев назад

    You keep switching between futures and forwards. Wrong. You keep referring to the contract price instead of the spot price. Wrong. It’s infuriating having to correct you all the time.