I'm just happy for Ara to cover for "normal Civ" while Civ experiments with Humankind mechanics. Sounds like a good deal to me, I'm playing ALL these games no matter what anyway.
I played it all, Civ, Humankind, old World, heck even EU4, Anno & Stellaris. Good grand strategy games doesn't come out often, so I figured why waste time hating when you can just enjoy all of em.
I kinda like that they show it's not a sausage fest, as Civ leaned heavily on ignoring likes of Joan of Arc after people kept replacing her with Napoleon in 3... xD I MEAN HOW MORE PINK CAN YOU GO THAN LITERAL SAPPHO FROM LESBOS.
I plan to buy both games, because I utterly LOVE Turn-based Historical Stategy games. I even loved Humankind, regardless of what other people thought of it.
i was in the technical betas and I really really fell in love with it. My only negative was that AI would take in turns to declare war on you for no reason.
I stopped playing Tropico 5 because my niece sabotaged me and took over the empire, without my consent 😂. Im looking for a civ type game where Im always in complete control and can just build and grow without any interruptions.
This is my first time hearing about the simultaneous turns. It sounds a lot like the Dominions games in that aspect, which could give the game its own pvp scene, where everybody takes one turn a day.
the concept was already used in the game Oriental Empires which was released in 2016, its a better mechanic since it mimics total war in a 4x environment.
Thanks for this video. Great to have a closer look at some of the appealing features in this game. I'm excited for both this and Civ 7. I just hope they're not missing magic, a la Humankind.
I am not against deep crafting systems, but usually they end into "craft only this and win the game" as someone will crack it and find the best you can craft, sell, win.
In Ara there is no one way of winning. A dev said, everything is possible, but you need to think clearly and intelligently about your path. There is no better thing to craft than another.
In my honest opinion, Civ 7 and the way it functions is its own thing. Even the culture changes could have been planned way before Humankind came out. Afterall, Civ 4 lets you pick a leader and a nation separately, though it was an option. Here, you're forced to do so (unless stated otherwise later on) If anything, I would argue that Ara History Untold is more in the line of a better game than Millennia, since they both are resource based, let alone Millennia looks like a game in Beta while Ara looks complete and full-
Thanks for watching! Ara looks great and, I know not everyone agrees, i think Civ 7 looks fun so far too. I think they said work began on Civ 7 pre-pandemic 🙂
I'm really excited for this and Civ 7, I love that this is going for a more 'grounded' Anno style thing while Civ is using this release to be more experimental
@@bmrigs never heard the word DEI before this year, seems to be just a dog whistle used by American racists who didn't get deported despite not being native.
It's in two parts really. 1) As the game progresses players will need to make sure they're doing enough in each act to stay in the game. This will raise the stakes across the game in my opinion. 2) When Civilizations are eliminated their lands become fair game. As I understand it, they also leave behind things that can give you prestige (which is how you win the game) and essentialy independent units that will attack you. I suspect this will lead to competition between the remaining players and add a little life to a part of the game that too often becomes monotonous. Thanks for watching!
ARA has achieved innovation in a mature game segment. Hard to do. Big achievement. Too bad the price is also big. There will be players who have to wait for sales. This may mean a year or more before it can be picked up.
@@BiNumLi Well, no PC has a Game Pass app and you can directly subscribe to that without the need for a console. Regardless, I doubt this game will do anything new, ground-breaking or innovative. It might be a serviceable clone at best and if it succeeds, it'll do so only because Civilization 7 has shot itself in the head before even being launched.
@@TheGoreforce I was wondering if it'll be the normal edition or the deluxe, because I didn't see anywhere where they mentioned which will be on game pass
I may give it a go but it does look a little cluttered, difficult to see whats going on at a glance. This might be a big problem for a strategy game or something that goes away once you are familiar with it.
It would be great to have skill-based matchmaking... Two purposes: easy to find multiplayer and play with people with similar skills (noobs in my case). This game would shine in Multiplayer...
Simultaneous turns is nothing new and works just fine, pretty much all pvp games played by the multiplayer community in civ use simultaneous turns, at least they did back when I used to play a lot civ V mp (you can play civ with simultaneous turns, there is just no point in singleplayer) Only difference with ARa is that now not only MP but also SP will be played the same way civ MP always have been played
Civ simultaneous turns isn't quite the same tho. You still got first moves and reacting to the opponent there, since you everyone is doing the turn at the same time. Here it's you plan your turn out, then everything is processed at the same time by the game. So neither of you know what the other is doing before the turn plays out.
Simultaneous turns are far superior to taking turns like on a board game. This feels more realistic, and much more natural: You give your units their orders. When that is done, every move (yours and your opponents) are resolved. Also, this works much better in multiplayer settings, than the traditional style. I was honestly baffled why CIV never took this step. Also, why not do a real globe? It feels like CIV didn't really evolve from 5 to 6 - and definately not 6 to 7, as far as we kan see at this point.
Anybody else feel the leader model renders need some work? Like everything is good except this one part. Seems like ara and civ 7’s leader modeling are all bad with them looking like renders from ps1 ps2 days. And it’s not like we can look past it because the leaders are presented in your huge screen at the start of each game. Like just spend a few days in blender or UE5 to polish the models and it’s good but these 2 games just seem to not care, at all. Really pushing back on the purchasing decision because of this
YMMV, I like renders in PS1/2, its claymation style models of Civ 6 I had to get used to... I still miss leaders cosplaying as eras from Civilization 3.
Far too little gamaplay has been released we've seen more of Civ 7's and that's months away. Also anything to do with Brad Wardell is usually overhyped garbage.
I'm quite interested in the game mechanics and I will probably buy it, but I must say the graphics look rather dull and uninspired. They need to take a look at the ANNO franchise and get themselves a better art director.
Thanks for watching! Unfortunately we weren't able to get our hands on the latest footage but I have to say I think it looks very nice. It's worth checking out on their RUclips page 🙂
Isn't that always the case in grand strategy games? Like name an exception, in Total War, castle-sized giants roam the earth, a power plant is like two tanks in length in C&C, grid-based games have units take same tile size as a city.
Why always comparisons with Civ 7 ? The game release in 5 months !! There can't be two good games? Especially since we haven't even seen the full gameplay of the two games yet. I thought this channel was serious but it seems to be purely put-upon. I unsubscribe.
Because most people dont have shit tons of money now and at both of them being around $70 people are going to initially choose one or the other . CIV 7 is coming out at a horrible time AFTER XMAS. Lots of people arent going to have the disposable income. If Ara ends up being good its going to syphon players from civ7 no doubt since it comes out in a week
If you watched the video you'd know I say they can both be enjoyed as they appear to offer 2 different experiences... The TN is based on some of the comments I've been getting from Civ fans about Ara.
Civ 7 definitely won't be very good. Mechanics are outdated. It doesn't mean those new small features once old stuff like tech system, hexes, boring battles, who first shoots wins remain.
@@kirilld6206i strongly disagree. Civ always delivered and I don't see why they won't this time. We've just seen a fraction of it and it's way too early to jump to conclusions.
I'm just happy for Ara to cover for "normal Civ" while Civ experiments with Humankind mechanics. Sounds like a good deal to me, I'm playing ALL these games no matter what anyway.
ARA is a silver lining of Civ VII blows ass
@@oufukubinta You are so mad about Civ 7, it will have tons of players like all previous Civ did, and you will find another game to complain about :D
I played it all, Civ, Humankind, old World, heck even EU4, Anno & Stellaris. Good grand strategy games doesn't come out often, so I figured why waste time hating when you can just enjoy all of em.
I kinda like that they show it's not a sausage fest, as Civ leaned heavily on ignoring likes of Joan of Arc after people kept replacing her with Napoleon in 3... xD I MEAN HOW MORE PINK CAN YOU GO THAN LITERAL SAPPHO FROM LESBOS.
I plan to buy both games, because I utterly LOVE Turn-based Historical Stategy games. I even loved Humankind, regardless of what other people thought of it.
This looks and feels much closer to reality while civ 7 looks more abstract and whimsical. I prefer the former.
see how it plays.
this seems so much more promising than civ 7, I am hating just about every bit of news regarding civ, zero excitement for it on my end
@@Bulgs_Alexievwell these are two completely different games that have absolutely nothing in common so it's weird to even compare them.
i was in the technical betas and I really really fell in love with it. My only negative was that AI would take in turns to declare war on you for no reason.
I stopped playing Tropico 5 because my niece sabotaged me and took over the empire, without my consent 😂. Im looking for a civ type game where Im always in complete control and can just build and grow without any interruptions.
This is my first time hearing about the simultaneous turns. It sounds a lot like the Dominions games in that aspect, which could give the game its own pvp scene, where everybody takes one turn a day.
They are already in Humankind.
the concept was already used in the game Oriental Empires which was released in 2016, its a better mechanic since it mimics total war in a 4x environment.
Thanks for this video. Great to have a closer look at some of the appealing features in this game. I'm excited for both this and Civ 7. I just hope they're not missing magic, a la Humankind.
Thanks for watching! I've watched hours and hours of Ara and it looks very promising to me. 🙂
This is a really great video. This is exactly what I was looking for re: info about about this game.
I am not against deep crafting systems, but usually they end into "craft only this and win the game" as someone will crack it and find the best you can craft, sell, win.
exactly. it's well known that strategy game devs are shit at balancing & making competent AI
In Ara there is no one way of winning. A dev said, everything is possible, but you need to think clearly and intelligently about your path. There is no better thing to craft than another.
I am really looking forward to trying this game out.
In my honest opinion, Civ 7 and the way it functions is its own thing. Even the culture changes could have been planned way before Humankind came out. Afterall, Civ 4 lets you pick a leader and a nation separately, though it was an option. Here, you're forced to do so (unless stated otherwise later on)
If anything, I would argue that Ara History Untold is more in the line of a better game than Millennia, since they both are resource based, let alone Millennia looks like a game in Beta while Ara looks complete and full-
Thanks for watching! Ara looks great and, I know not everyone agrees, i think Civ 7 looks fun so far too.
I think they said work began on Civ 7 pre-pandemic 🙂
I'm really excited for this and Civ 7, I love that this is going for a more 'grounded' Anno style thing while Civ is using this release to be more experimental
ARA punishes bad players by kicking them out and Civ rewards them so that they catch up with you no matter how badly they're playing
I like neither.
Civ7 is a DEI wet dream.
Ara has an option to keep the human player.
@@bmrigs never heard the word DEI before this year, seems to be just a dog whistle used by American racists who didn't get deported despite not being native.
@@mohamedz87 don't care, want my British empire fighting the Zulu's scenario.
5:43 I'm not sure I understand how eliminating the weaker civs is supposed to address the late game lull. Can you elaborate please?
It's in two parts really.
1) As the game progresses players will need to make sure they're doing enough in each act to stay in the game. This will raise the stakes across the game in my opinion.
2) When Civilizations are eliminated their lands become fair game. As I understand it, they also leave behind things that can give you prestige (which is how you win the game) and essentialy independent units that will attack you.
I suspect this will lead to competition between the remaining players and add a little life to a part of the game that too often becomes monotonous.
Thanks for watching!
I am going to try this for sure.
ARA has achieved innovation in a mature game segment. Hard to do. Big achievement. Too bad the price is also big. There will be players who have to wait for sales. This may mean a year or more before it can be picked up.
Ara will be available on Xbox game pass, so it won't be that costly, until the DLCs comes through.
XBox? It costs to get that. Then the games are cheaper. Same same.
@@BiNumLi Well, no PC has a Game Pass app and you can directly subscribe to that without the need for a console. Regardless, I doubt this game will do anything new, ground-breaking or innovative. It might be a serviceable clone at best and if it succeeds, it'll do so only because Civilization 7 has shot itself in the head before even being launched.
game pass you get the deluxe edition upgrade for 10 dollars. my month has already saved me more than 40 dollars.
@@TheGoreforce I was wondering if it'll be the normal edition or the deluxe, because I didn't see anywhere where they mentioned which will be on game pass
I may give it a go but it does look a little cluttered, difficult to see whats going on at a glance. This might be a big problem for a strategy game or something that goes away once you are familiar with it.
It would be great to have skill-based matchmaking... Two purposes: easy to find multiplayer and play with people with similar skills (noobs in my case). This game would shine in Multiplayer...
Not long now. Thanks for the vid!
Hope this is a offline game too
It's 2024 and it's sad that we need to hope for this feat
Simultaneous turns is nothing new and works just fine, pretty much all pvp games played by the multiplayer community in civ use simultaneous turns, at least they did back when I used to play a lot civ V mp (you can play civ with simultaneous turns, there is just no point in singleplayer)
Only difference with ARa is that now not only MP but also SP will be played the same way civ MP always have been played
Civ simultaneous turns isn't quite the same tho. You still got first moves and reacting to the opponent there, since you everyone is doing the turn at the same time.
Here it's you plan your turn out, then everything is processed at the same time by the game. So neither of you know what the other is doing before the turn plays out.
@@ResandOuies true. civ mp is very close to RTS sometimes so having all moves executed at end of turn in ARA is a bit different
Thanks.
looks promising. There is possibility that greedy Take 2 interactive might make a total mess of Civ 7
Buying both, dont care
Doesn't seem to be on Mac though?
That's pretty par for the course. Mac always gets the games late. PC master race noob
What does the word "Ara" mean ?
Exclamation associated with Armenia... kind of like "yeah" or "oi" in English.
king, alter, ara bird. ect.
I have played all the beta and i didn't like it very much. It feels like there is only one way to achive things.
Is the thumbnail the non-binary non-historical character they added in the game?
Simultaneous turns are far superior to taking turns like on a board game. This feels more realistic, and much more natural: You give your units their orders. When that is done, every move (yours and your opponents) are resolved. Also, this works much better in multiplayer settings, than the traditional style. I was honestly baffled why CIV never took this step. Also, why not do a real globe? It feels like CIV didn't really evolve from 5 to 6 - and definately not 6 to 7, as far as we kan see at this point.
it's great, you actually have more of the "art of war strategies applicable" feels like catan, combined with diplomacy, combined with civ.
I cant wait for the layoffs!!
Anybody else feel the leader model renders need some work? Like everything is good except this one part. Seems like ara and civ 7’s leader modeling are all bad with them looking like renders from ps1 ps2 days. And it’s not like we can look past it because the leaders are presented in your huge screen at the start of each game. Like just spend a few days in blender or UE5 to polish the models and it’s good but these 2 games just seem to not care, at all. Really pushing back on the purchasing decision because of this
YMMV, I like renders in PS1/2, its claymation style models of Civ 6 I had to get used to... I still miss leaders cosplaying as eras from Civilization 3.
i can finally win by bein a greedy bastard
I preferred her being blonde
Xbox série X release!?
i played all civ version with all addons but i do plan to switch to ARA now.. really do not like what they have done to civ 7 and 6 is just anoying
It has verry little to do with Civ games unfortunately. It's closer to city builder than to a typical civ game.
Far too little gamaplay has been released we've seen more of Civ 7's and that's months away. Also anything to do with Brad Wardell is usually overhyped garbage.
althrough its probadly a good game, just think the playerbase will be dead when civ 7 is here
Looks like goyslop
I'm quite interested in the game mechanics and I will probably buy it, but I must say the graphics look rather dull and uninspired. They need to take a look at the ANNO franchise and get themselves a better art director.
Thanks for watching! Unfortunately we weren't able to get our hands on the latest footage but I have to say I think it looks very nice. It's worth checking out on their RUclips page 🙂
@@doctorstreamspunk9996 they have a good team. Its amplitude who need to fire UI ppl and firaxis need to get rid of childish graphics style.
I dislike how the people are not correct in scale/size to the buildings.
That is all you can come up with?
We want microscopic people! 😅
Isn't that always the case in grand strategy games? Like name an exception, in Total War, castle-sized giants roam the earth, a power plant is like two tanks in length in C&C, grid-based games have units take same tile size as a city.
I'm very suspicious about the crafting system. So many goods in a 4x game? I don't think it's good. I will give it a try though.
it's a grand strategy game. not a 4x, it's supposed to be more complex than the puzzle game like civ 6
Why always comparisons with Civ 7 ? The game release in 5 months !! There can't be two good games? Especially since we haven't even seen the full gameplay of the two games yet. I thought this channel was serious but it seems to be purely put-upon. I unsubscribe.
Because most people dont have shit tons of money now and at both of them being around $70 people are going to initially choose one or the other . CIV 7 is coming out at a horrible time AFTER XMAS. Lots of people arent going to have the disposable income. If Ara ends up being good its going to syphon players from civ7 no doubt since it comes out in a week
If you watched the video you'd know I say they can both be enjoyed as they appear to offer 2 different experiences... The TN is based on some of the comments I've been getting from Civ fans about Ara.
Civ 7 definitely won't be very good. Mechanics are outdated. It doesn't mean those new small features once old stuff like tech system, hexes, boring battles, who first shoots wins remain.
Huh? Just because u compare two things doesn’t mean you can’t enjoy both lol
@@kirilld6206i strongly disagree. Civ always delivered and I don't see why they won't this time. We've just seen a fraction of it and it's way too early to jump to conclusions.
DEI and modernism I hear with the characters. So a pass for me.
Maybe an option to turn it off?
only the native american leader, that absolutely did female ceremonial roles. "two spirit"
was gonna pre order but having joann as non-binary is ubsurd, tim kipp please fix this.
joann is not non-binary, the non-binary is a two spirit native american leader.
It does not
It does too.