There’s a better way to do this to get the same result.. $110 inside - place the 4 & 10 with the first hit inside keeping a nickel - assuming the next hit is an inside numba, collect the $35 and regress to $96 across - you’ve put $84 back in the rack, only exposed now $26 - with the next hit, you collect and you’re either at $5 cost for $96 across or you’re completely paid for if it’s a 4/10 +$1.. with this way, you’re only exposed $110 and not $140, and with a regress on the 2nd hit, you’re limiting your exposure even more - still ready to power press collect after 3 hits just like squeeze play on a $10 table and slightly less work for the dealer
I'm with you. I play squeeze play as you're describing, though not having the 4&10 covered to start can be a pain. I'd rather lose $110 than $140 though on that point seven! Dennis is too aggressive with the pressing, IMO. It feels like he never gets out.
Yeah, this is just squeeze play where you start with the 4/10 covered. Which probably explains why they like it so much. I like this for $5, and maybe $10 table, but it’s too much for a $15 for my comfort because of how I buy in being $1400 for this and $1k-1100 for squeeze play. $300 each buy-in makes a difference when you’re playing multiple buy-ins while during a week or weekend vacation/trip
@@damianchenot2667I always power press and collect the first time before going directly into triple lux. If it happens to work out that all the numbers are power pressed once, I will actually regress back down to 96 across first then go up from there
So the difference between this and ultimate squeeze play is the addition of the 4 and 10. Its an extra $30 upfront risk while covering extra numbers to increase the chance of getting out
These crap strategies are trash and makes to many assumptions. The best strategy is having a dollar value goal.....what ever you want to walk away from the table with divide by 3. example....if i want $500 dollars i put $150 on 6 & 8 i put $125 on 5 & 9 i put $100 on 4 & 10 6 & 8= $175 5 & 9=$175 4 & 10=$190 3 numbers will be over $500 done. So many crap players depend on long rolls to make money.....bad strategy
These are the kind of jackoffs that'll come in drop a dollar on the line acting like they're tipping the dealers and then stand there and stroke you for 8 hours while they hedge everything and load up the props on every come out roll. Uh give me six dollar red with a four dollar high low, hop the easy eights high on the six two, uh a five dollar horn high yo with a dollar ace deuce, oh and hop the hard ways four four dollars.
There’s a better way to do this to get the same result.. $110 inside - place the 4 & 10 with the first hit inside keeping a nickel - assuming the next hit is an inside numba, collect the $35 and regress to $96 across - you’ve put $84 back in the rack, only exposed now $26 - with the next hit, you collect and you’re either at $5 cost for $96 across or you’re completely paid for if it’s a 4/10 +$1.. with this way, you’re only exposed $110 and not $140, and with a regress on the 2nd hit, you’re limiting your exposure even more - still ready to power press collect after 3 hits just like squeeze play on a $10 table and slightly less work for the dealer
I'm with you.
I play squeeze play as you're describing, though not having the 4&10 covered to start can be a pain. I'd rather lose $110 than $140 though on that point seven!
Dennis is too aggressive with the pressing, IMO. It feels like he never gets out.
Yeah, this is just squeeze play where you start with the 4/10 covered. Which probably explains why they like it so much.
I like this for $5, and maybe $10 table, but it’s too much for a $15 for my comfort because of how I buy in being $1400 for this and $1k-1100 for squeeze play. $300 each buy-in makes a difference when you’re playing multiple buy-ins while during a week or weekend vacation/trip
@@damianchenot2667I always power press and collect the first time before going directly into triple lux. If it happens to work out that all the numbers are power pressed once, I will actually regress back down to 96 across first then go up from there
Love this strategy, had great success with it last night at Golden Nugget 🎉
So the difference between this and ultimate squeeze play is the addition of the 4 and 10. Its an extra $30 upfront risk while covering extra numbers to increase the chance of getting out
7 out
Nice and easy... do y'all do anything with the Crapless tables?
Dammit Dennis, I asked you what "the truth is " comment was a year ago, lol.
Only if you don't go out on the second roll.
You 2 make a cute couple. Nice pride video!!!
Man I'm so confused
If.
Looking like a bad strategy from the demo😂
These crap strategies are trash and makes to many assumptions. The best strategy is having a dollar value goal.....what ever you want to walk away from the table with divide by 3.
example....if i want $500 dollars
i put $150 on 6 & 8
i put $125 on 5 & 9
i put $100 on 4 & 10
6 & 8= $175
5 & 9=$175
4 & 10=$190
3 numbers will be over $500
done. So many crap players depend on long rolls to make money.....bad strategy
I know the secrets of craps.
This kid should only play DC
These are the kind of jackoffs that'll come in drop a dollar on the line acting like they're tipping the dealers and then stand there and stroke you for 8 hours while they hedge everything and load up the props on every come out roll.
Uh give me six dollar red with a four dollar high low, hop the easy eights high on the six two, uh a five dollar horn high yo with a dollar ace deuce, oh and hop the hard ways four four dollars.
1st!!
Second - Dennis