I don't think your prediction is biased against LUMIX by excluding it from the hot cameras of different brands! It ended without Lumix. You're satisfied, but not me and the big fans who adore Lumix cameras!
Better gear won't make you a better photographer. We're already well past the point of diminishing returns and into the overkill zone. In any case, if you're relying on tech to improve your images, then no camera or lens will make a difference. Better to look for a rig that gives you more flexibility/portability. I'd recommend Micro Four Thirds format, as you'll be able to carry a wide range of small/light lenses to places you'd never want to haul larger-format gear (my go-to is the Lumix G9M2). If you really want to go light and fast, a 1" bridge camera (e.g., Lumix FZ1000 or Sony RX-10) will give you more IQ than you need to produce gallery-worthy prints under most conditions.
@@dng88 I get it, but had no auto anything (including focusing) from the '70s until I finally went digital roughly two decades ago. My G9M2 has a great 779-point PD plus DFD hybrid focusing system with all kinds of auto detect functionality, plus 8 stops of IBIS, up to 60 FPS with 1.5s pre-burst and AF/AE (75 FPS with fixed focus/exp), 5.8K Open Gate and 240 FPS 4K video, up to 100MP with pixel shift, and a bunch of other ridiculously sophisticated tech, but I don't use most of it, even sometimes preferring manual focus (with peaking, as my eyes aren't as good as they used to be). My point is that even mid-range cameras several years old are more capable than US$6K+ flagships from a few years prior (lenses are way more important than bodies anyway). Either way, a great photographer can get better shots from a Holga than a newbie with a Phase One. Too much emphasis on tech is not improving the real state of the ART.
None of these will help - if the finger on the release button isn't connected to a creative brain. How to take better photos? 1 roll of film one SLR 1 lens. IMAGINATION AND SKILL
Not sure I understand the whole MegaPixels race if the technology does not progress on the noise control side of photographing. You're way better off getting a 24-30MP camera with low-noise resolution, Camera manufacturers seem to focus on dazzling potential buyers with big figures but can the current low-noise technology cope with 100MP? Sony is not saying much on that front but the two come together. You might as well shove a 1,000 Horse Power engine on a Fiat Panda transmission.
These are assumptions based on wishful thinking. The large band between enthusiasts and long time cravers, those who make their living on simpler less costly machines and "suiting their styles" range of lenses being brought in from DSLR times still rule the markets. And that is how Fujifilm, Nikon fx and Lumix remain in demand. And will continue to do so. These assumptions are just worth some imaginative information, RUclips benefits and a logical trend assumption. Commerce wins over technology.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
I don't think your prediction is biased against LUMIX by excluding it from the hot cameras of different brands! It ended without Lumix. You're satisfied, but not me and the big fans who adore Lumix cameras!
I hope the Fujifilm X-Pro4, if it becomes a reality, places less emphasis on video. Fujifilm needs at least one model that is photo-centric.
Hasselblad of course !
Hasselblad X3D is my choice. Wow.
I don’t think the X3D will be released in 2025 as the X2D was released in September 2022.
In an economy built on consumerism, what ends can you expect?
My most wanted camera of 2025 would be Ricoh GR4 and Ricoh Gr4x
Better gear won't make you a better photographer. We're already well past the point of diminishing returns and into the overkill zone. In any case, if you're relying on tech to improve your images, then no camera or lens will make a difference. Better to look for a rig that gives you more flexibility/portability. I'd recommend Micro Four Thirds format, as you'll be able to carry a wide range of small/light lenses to places you'd never want to haul larger-format gear (my go-to is the Lumix G9M2). If you really want to go light and fast, a 1" bridge camera (e.g., Lumix FZ1000 or Sony RX-10) will give you more IQ than you need to produce gallery-worthy prints under most conditions.
Quite true but Not for focusing. Hence whilst z50ii use the 5 year old sensor still have a chance, not sure about z80.
@@dng88 I get it, but had no auto anything (including focusing) from the '70s until I finally went digital roughly two decades ago. My G9M2 has a great 779-point PD plus DFD hybrid focusing system with all kinds of auto detect functionality, plus 8 stops of IBIS, up to 60 FPS with 1.5s pre-burst and AF/AE (75 FPS with fixed focus/exp), 5.8K Open Gate and 240 FPS 4K video, up to 100MP with pixel shift, and a bunch of other ridiculously sophisticated tech, but I don't use most of it, even sometimes preferring manual focus (with peaking, as my eyes aren't as good as they used to be). My point is that even mid-range cameras several years old are more capable than US$6K+ flagships from a few years prior (lenses are way more important than bodies anyway). Either way, a great photographer can get better shots from a Holga than a newbie with a Phase One. Too much emphasis on tech is not improving the real state of the ART.
So true.For 98% of hobby photographers the gear isn’t what limits the quality of their photos. Except a few exceptions.Me included.
Have marked my date for fujifilm XE5 …
I was hoping the XM5 would have had IBIS but now I am hoping the XE5 does.
My most wanted camera does not exist yet.
None of these will help - if the finger on the release button isn't connected to a creative brain. How to take better photos? 1 roll of film one SLR 1 lens. IMAGINATION AND SKILL
Overkill with 100mp
U forgot to mention DJI. They are going to join the game as well
Yes, I will add DJI in upcoming video. Stay tuned!
That Sony 100 megapixel and 8 K iOS going to over heat quick for sure!!!
R6 3 looks good. 100mp over kill
Yeah!
leaving out of the list the Sony FX3 Mark II .... big miss...
@gerasimosioardanitis5494 Thanks for pointing that out! We'll definitely consider the Sony FX3 Mark II in an upcoming video. Stay tuned!
A.I. channel.
Only one Nikon? You lost it for me.
Not sure I understand the whole MegaPixels race if the technology does not progress on the noise control side of photographing. You're way better off getting a 24-30MP camera with low-noise resolution, Camera manufacturers seem to focus on dazzling potential buyers with big figures but can the current low-noise technology cope with 100MP? Sony is not saying much on that front but the two come together. You might as well shove a 1,000 Horse Power engine on a Fiat Panda transmission.
And as soon as I hear the words " Trust me." I turn them off.
These are assumptions based on wishful thinking. The large band between enthusiasts and long time cravers, those who make their living on simpler less costly machines and "suiting their styles" range of lenses being brought in from DSLR times still rule the markets. And that is how Fujifilm, Nikon fx and Lumix remain in demand. And will continue to do so. These assumptions are just worth some imaginative information, RUclips benefits and a logical trend assumption. Commerce wins over technology.
"Click" bait....
Lost interest when he said it was about cameras coming out in 2024….twice!..Shoddy workmanship hardly gives you any faith in any ‘predictions.’