I don't think your prediction is biased against LUMIX by excluding it from the hot cameras of different brands! It ended without Lumix. You're satisfied, but not me and the big fans who adore Lumix cameras!
None of these will help - if the finger on the release button isn't connected to a creative brain. How to take better photos? 1 roll of film one SLR 1 lens. IMAGINATION AND SKILL
Better gear won't make you a better photographer. We're already well past the point of diminishing returns and into the overkill zone. In any case, if you're relying on tech to improve your images, then no camera or lens will make a difference. Better to look for a rig that gives you more flexibility/portability. I'd recommend Micro Four Thirds format, as you'll be able to carry a wide range of small/light lenses to places you'd never want to haul larger-format gear (my go-to is the Lumix G9M2). If you really want to go light and fast, a 1" bridge camera (e.g., Lumix FZ1000 or Sony RX-10) will give you more IQ than you need to produce gallery-worthy prints under most conditions.
@@dng88 I get it, but had no auto anything (including focusing) from the '70s until I finally went digital roughly two decades ago. My G9M2 has a great 779-point PD plus DFD hybrid focusing system with all kinds of auto detect functionality, plus 8 stops of IBIS, up to 60 FPS with 1.5s pre-burst and AF/AE (75 FPS with fixed focus/exp), 5.8K Open Gate and 240 FPS 4K video, up to 100MP with pixel shift, and a bunch of other ridiculously sophisticated tech, but I don't use most of it, even sometimes preferring manual focus (with peaking, as my eyes aren't as good as they used to be). My point is that even mid-range cameras several years old are more capable than US$6K+ flagships from a few years prior (lenses are way more important than bodies anyway). Either way, a great photographer can get better shots from a Holga than a newbie with a Phase One. Too much emphasis on tech is not improving the real state of the ART.
Hasselblad X3D is my choice. Wow.
I don’t think the X3D will be released in 2025 as the X2D was released in September 2022.
I don't think your prediction is biased against LUMIX by excluding it from the hot cameras of different brands! It ended without Lumix. You're satisfied, but not me and the big fans who adore Lumix cameras!
Hasselblad of course !
Have marked my date for fujifilm XE5 …
None of these will help - if the finger on the release button isn't connected to a creative brain. How to take better photos? 1 roll of film one SLR 1 lens. IMAGINATION AND SKILL
That Sony 100 megapixel and 8 K iOS going to over heat quick for sure!!!
Better gear won't make you a better photographer. We're already well past the point of diminishing returns and into the overkill zone. In any case, if you're relying on tech to improve your images, then no camera or lens will make a difference. Better to look for a rig that gives you more flexibility/portability. I'd recommend Micro Four Thirds format, as you'll be able to carry a wide range of small/light lenses to places you'd never want to haul larger-format gear (my go-to is the Lumix G9M2). If you really want to go light and fast, a 1" bridge camera (e.g., Lumix FZ1000 or Sony RX-10) will give you more IQ than you need to produce gallery-worthy prints under most conditions.
Quite true but Not for focusing. Hence whilst z50ii use the 5 year old sensor still have a chance, not sure about z80.
@@dng88 I get it, but had no auto anything (including focusing) from the '70s until I finally went digital roughly two decades ago. My G9M2 has a great 779-point PD plus DFD hybrid focusing system with all kinds of auto detect functionality, plus 8 stops of IBIS, up to 60 FPS with 1.5s pre-burst and AF/AE (75 FPS with fixed focus/exp), 5.8K Open Gate and 240 FPS 4K video, up to 100MP with pixel shift, and a bunch of other ridiculously sophisticated tech, but I don't use most of it, even sometimes preferring manual focus (with peaking, as my eyes aren't as good as they used to be). My point is that even mid-range cameras several years old are more capable than US$6K+ flagships from a few years prior (lenses are way more important than bodies anyway). Either way, a great photographer can get better shots from a Holga than a newbie with a Phase One. Too much emphasis on tech is not improving the real state of the ART.
U forgot to mention DJI. They are going to join the game as well
Yes, I will add DJI in upcoming video. Stay tuned!
Overkill with 100mp
leaving out of the list the Sony FX3 Mark II .... big miss...
@gerasimosioardanitis5494 Thanks for pointing that out! We'll definitely consider the Sony FX3 Mark II in an upcoming video. Stay tuned!
And as soon as I hear the words " Trust me." I turn them off.
"Click" bait....