It's not as exciting as the first man to leave earth and enter space, land on the moon etc. Lots of countries have done this and launching satellites has become almost commonplace so no excitement to compare to the Sputnik 1 launch etc.
the fact that all the footage besides the launch is animated makes me feel like either they are hiding something or they didn’t send that shit to the moon at all
I was thinking the same thing. This was so underwhelming. Just video of a bunch of guys yelling and clapping... The SpaceX rockets have cameras all around and we see everything live. They couldn't do it with this one? This is so crappy...
I do, just search 1969 moon landing, plenty of sweet vids landing on dust - "hey bros check out this sweet sweet dust, yaaaa were on the mahhhhoooooon!" @@mbb8482
You're a clueless robot, fact is that you can only get a curved shadow no matter the angle only from a sphere, you can't prove your schizophrenic thoughts are fact
Uuhm, those are animations... Actual footage was filmed by a little camera that was released during landing. But, that footage has to be beamed down, so will take a little while (if everything worked)
They did. The mission has failed. The lander has probably crashed, there is no data feed. They have some telemetry showing it ended up on the moon. Which, to some extent, is a success. But it doesn't send images or respond to commands.
@@nexpro6985 Nothing to see here! Yes we landed!! Take our word for it!! You can trust us, were not the Gov. Dude go and wash your face and wake up! Nothing is FACT until proven
? Folks really need to understand what SWaP constraints can do to a lunar lander. Heard the same crap from uninformed nobodies even back when my country landed its Moon craft last year. Apparently all these f00ls missed the entire live image stream because they only watched the media coverage of the landing, not the actual livestream. Honestly, this world would be a MUCH better place if people just learn to read more and talk less. We already have the internet. All the information is RIGHT THERE. Ignorance is inexcusable at this point.
@@grahamyates2490 not true. back in 1969, we had a live feed from the landing. I know, because i was sitting in front of our TV back then. Oh boy, young people today.......
@@wollie1211 not quite accurate. There wasn't a live feed of the Apollo 11 landing itself. The live feed began when Armstrong was descending the ladder but that was over six hours after they landed. A little bit of basic research will confirm that.
@@grahamyates2490 also the TV Stations were not allowed a direct feed of the event! , They were givin a copy at very low rez. Good job on fooling the fools NASA. Millions of dollars for cartoons lol
It takes time to send video and image files. One, because live footage wasn't a priority on this mission and two, because they lost connection with it for a bit.
@OGMeatball yes, but the apollo landing site was in direct "line of site" of the earth. This mission landed towards the south pole which also makes communication a problem.
And now the grainy black and white pictures will come flowing in. It's amazing with all the tech we have that we can't get real high definition pictures.
are you trying to say that this is "fake" or something? everything in this video IS cgi made by intuitive machines they arent getting an incredibly strong signal right now and are trying to get footage and photos from the lander but its not their main priority
@@uflocyes, set to "deliberately bad" so that it would seem realistic. These boys are not devious, just want to do successful PR work, get paid and then forget the whole matter.
What the presenter did not mention is that at that place the moon night is 2 weeks, so after 1 week its small batteries will run out. Don't be surprised if 2 weeks later it comes back online (if its solar array receives sunlight) :P
How did the astronauts of appolo 11 handle the cold and heat exposures in 1969 with the small backpack aircon and heaters of that day with the batteries of 1969??
"over 50 years,..." Note to Editorial, this is the first time a Private spacecraft has landed on the Moon, which has never been done before. It's been 50 years since a US Governmental spacecraft landed there, these are very different things that should not be conflated and mistrued.
They act like it such a huge goal like China and India aren’t on the moon and even then it wasn’t even a person. Complete fail for the United States. Brag when we put someone back on the moon.
Oh, so NASA is not involved? Better check your facts - this is not like a private business just did it on their own. Why do you think Houston Control was used. NASA’s innate ability to do much meaningful for 50 years forced them to the private sector to land this to do NASA experiments. This is not a sign of triumph, it’s a sign of decay in a major way.
We had those fantastic HD videos of Perseverance landing on Mars now we just get a grainy long distance shot on the moon. How long was the selfie stick???
It takes a long time to send the files to earth. Unlike the apollo lander, it wasn't a priority to show the landing live so they didn't get an antena capable of beaming the information live. It also had tight weight restrictions.
Forget it. There is no use proving stuff to nincompoops. Orbiters from other nations like India have already snapped pics of the Apollo 11 on the Lunar surface. Yet you are still here, aren't you?
@@nexpro6985 !d!0ts tend to think that the world revolves around them. So it is elementary for them to wonder why their objections to the reality of the Apollo landings are not being taken seriously enough by authorities to actually spend a few hundred Million $ to land right next to one of the Apollo descent modules. Nevermind the fact that their next demand is going to be a Billion $ demand titled "I don't believe these new fake pics, take one of us there so that he can see it for himself and prove it to us", followed promptly by a Trillion $ demand titled "He was not one of us, take all of us there one by one."
No telescope has ever been able to spot the moon as it is too bright for today's ultra-HD cameras and destroys the fragile chip surface. Nasa predict it will be back in a month when there's a full moon perhaps. Still to be confirmed.....
Funny thing about the moon landings.... fifty years ago and the other missions longer than that. We were able to get live footage? And now fifty years later? No live footage? Just a weird peculiar state of affairs and facts... and i also am selling the brooklyn bridge if anyone is interested in purchasing it? The bidding will start at 1 dollar American. 😂
I was asking the same question, but then I thought about the political fallout if a lander should crash on approach, and the failed mission broadcast live all over the world. Other nations are sending spacecraft to the moon and some of them don't like us. They would have a field day with the propaganda. Still, I wish it was possible to do this and finally shut the moon landing deniers up once and for all.
I found the technology to film on the moon and I'm thinking about selling it for a low low price...🤗👆ok I'll tell 🤫slo mo in fact ckmy ch for real time 😂😂😂😂
The title and description are both wrong. A private owned company landed a spacecraft on the moon *for the first time ever.* It is the first time in over 50 years that a US-made lander has successfully landed on the moon.
Did it land? There is no evidence except a tiny hall packed with fans screaming. I suppose that is enough for Americans. The Taliban have higher standards.
The first US unmanned soft landing on the moon was in 1966 by Surveyor 1 (about 58 years ago). The Soviet Union beat this by a bit with a soft landing a little earlier the same year. Now, here we are all these years later trying to repeat history all over again with minor variations in launch vehicles and new, more modern technology. It makes one wonder why we stopped going to the moon.
Odysseus moon lander didn't have a live stream. But all the Apollo missions from '68-'72 did, as well as the Chinese Jade Rabbit in 2013. Even the Yutu-2 streamed a landing on the far side of the moon in 2018. Just another reason why the Americans keep trying to sanction China. They are clearly way behind in many aspects (notwithstanding it is still a good achievement).
The rover missions on Mars also had that. But maybe for some reason they didn't? Last time the indian one also didn't have life footage in fact even their footage when the craft was in space was very laggy. I think it all depends on the budget because even a single camera can increase the budget a lot and also the weight.
@barman WTF, single camera, do you know how advance cameras sensors these days, and small and they become? Same with freaking transmission technology, there is smoothing fkn wrong/fishy with all these missions, I'm not specialist scientist, but these people always trying to hide something.
FFS, are you serious with that shit? Is the Earth flat? Was the moon landing faked? Come on. Perhaps, you should study some science instead of conspiracy theories. Although, the dumbing down of people (especially in the U.S.) is on an exponential dive. I mean, when people refuse to wear masks or get vaccinated against COVID, the only conclusion you can draw is the people have become incredibly STUPID. A good (but, depressing) movie to watch is 'Idiocracy'. It use to be funny to me, but, now, it's just a documentary.
man, there's so many space engineers in the comments "Just attach a live camera" " it should've had GoPro's on it" This is a private company and it's a lot of money.. I'm sure sure they probably don't care about filming a landing and just to prove it to you
yes, he was the only man on earth who wanted to see, so it would not have been worth the extra cost of a larger transponder from Amazon just to satisfy him. They did this film just for aesthetical reasons. Mothers like to be proud of their sons and no mothers were complaining except epic monkey's. Did you tell her you might make a fool of yourself today? Don't worry, she will be proud anyway.
With all our newTechnology since 1969 think we could do a fly over of one of the apollo landing sites? Or maybe get a high resolution photo from a satellite. 🧐🤔🙄
LRO images can be looked up and you can clearly see the footprints and the descent stages, equipment left behind, etc. It's been well over a decade since it's been available.
@@Davesworld7yes "you can clearly see the footprints" but we can't see the spacecraft which in 4.2m tall so much smaller than the SPACEMEN who landed in 1969 with the biggest feet ever seen. Remember? "One big foot" for usa, yes size ten feet and four inches - you can clearly see the footprints!!!.
It's too secret to show to the public. But it DID happen, as we all saw it on TV. My grandmother works at NASA, so had access to the LARGE telescope and could even see the dust particles cover the transponder window until the automatic windscreen wipers started up.
How did the astronauts of appolo 11 handle the cold and heat exposures in 1969 with the small backpack aircon and heaters of that day with the batteries of 1969??
The surface of the moon heats up to beastly hot, cools to frigid temperatures and then heats up again over a 29 day cycle. The Apollo missions were each on the surface for less than 48 hours so it was easy for Nasa to pick windows of time where the temperatures were reasonable for humans and their machinery. The real challenge will be when humans are on the moon for weeks at a time.
Any probe landing is a nail biter. Anything can go wrong. In this case, the primary descent navigation LIDAR system failed, so they developed on the fly, a software uplink to use two other laser systems installed on the lander to do the same job, although without the same precision. No guarantee that it would work. So, YES, a nail biter.
@@garyreed2206 Its a story, friend. There's nothing real about it, its just a satanic deception to keep you from the truth of there being a creator. I hope He gives you eyes to see, friend.
He was on assignment for PBS in the Philippines in February 2014 when a heavy case of equipment fell on his left forearm. It caused a nasty bruise, but not enough to stop O’Brien. He wanted to finish his stories and escape for a few days on a beach. The following night, his pain increased and O’Brien sought medical attention. He was diagnosed with acute compartment system, a condition where his swollen muscles blocked blood flow in his arm. As he was getting ready for surgery, he searched the Internet for details on a diagnosis he had never heard before, and grew alarmed when words like “life-threatening” and “amputation” popped up. Waking up after surgery, O’Brien’s first inclination was that he caught a break. He could feel his left arm, the fingers on his hand. But it was an illusion, a phantom limb. His arm was gone. He checked out of the hospital two days later and spent more than a week in a Philippines hotel, finishing his PBS stories. In an extreme form of denial, the divorced father of two told no one what had happened, even his children. They were dark days, and he told Gupta he even considered suicide.
they definitely have proof it landed upright, they have an entire mission control center with a bunch of telemetry and stuff im pretty sure there would be a pretty obvious problem with the lander if they couldnt tell how it landed
India reached the moon last year. It lost contact with the moon soon after landing. However, both India and US celebrations are short live due to technical glitches.
I do not agree, beautiful...absolutely....the privacy act should never have aloud this!.... A few up there have 100% Infact showed why camera to your bedroom or direction to your home are far more PROTECTED then the invention and absolute stunning unity and level of education, intuition and air space it takes to get there....
And the neighbour bringing over a pie sayingg "Hey! We are your new neighbours! Only three days away from Earth! No taxes! What a real estate deal, right?"
That's funny, I came to enjoy the spoils of the us education system too like lack of critical thinking skills and the inability to recognize patterns of deceit
@@EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV when they reveal real footage of this event let me know, then we can go back and forth about conflicting astronauts' reports on the visibility of stars
@@roachfamily2434 What is the point? Even when they show the footage, you folks don't believe it. Your kind probably wouldn't even believe it if you were taken there physically. Probably will try to remove your helmet calling it a VR goggle, wanting to "see it for yourself". Now, human body can indeed survive a couple seconds in hard vaccum, but your eyes, not so much. And the lunar dust you inhale will probably be Karma for your sins, but even I don't wish something that painful upon you. Not that anybody is daft enough to pay a couple Billion $ to send someone as unimportant as you up there. So, like I said, there is no point.
Shows how times have changed. I didn’t even hear about this until after it landed.
MSM is propaganda and you will miss everything. that is what have changed
Agreed!
It's not as exciting as the first man to leave earth and enter space, land on the moon etc. Lots of countries have done this and launching satellites has become almost commonplace so no excitement to compare to the Sputnik 1 launch etc.
First time I heard about it too. Not very surprising. Mainstream news is garbage.
Same. Was it on TV News ? I don't watch TV. Times have definitely changed.
the fact that all the footage besides the launch is animated makes me feel like either they are hiding something or they didn’t send that shit to the moon at all
And they allegedly landed on dark side of the moon hence no additional real photos can be taken. Very convenient!
Think Pink Floyd!
Bingo all fake
Faaaaaaaaake
@@user-zz5ju6ic5u what do u think the motive is ?
@@WISDOMvsKnowledge22 Billions of dollars collected through tax dollars
Who was covering the space craft landing on the moon? The cameraman did great.
Marvin
Funny
It was an animation...
I was thinking the same thing. This was so underwhelming. Just video of a bunch of guys yelling and clapping...
The SpaceX rockets have cameras all around and we see everything live. They couldn't do it with this one?
This is so crappy...
@@middleway5271👍
No video. No pictures. Trust us. We're on the moon.
video is coming, photos are coming
@@ufloc they work in the studio right now to provide those pictures.😂😂😂
@@virgiliustancu9293:D :D
Yeah, they have to scrub them first!@@ufloc
@@ufloc hope at the end of the year 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I don’t see any real footage. Where is it?
You dont understand any of it do ya.
on the moon
I do, just search 1969 moon landing, plenty of sweet vids landing on dust - "hey bros check out this sweet sweet dust, yaaaa were on the mahhhhoooooon!" @@mbb8482
@@soccerguy2433the footage is on the moon?
@@mbb8482no, can you explain how there's no footage yet from the moon?
This movie deserves an Oscar award
I CAN GET BETTER CGI GRAPHICS ON MY 2008 PLAYSTATION 3
Yeah, an oscar for the worst visual effects
If it’s a Cartoon it MUST be real 😂😂😂
We did it guys! We landed in CGI Moon!. Thanks Boston news for breaking this story.
Prove its CGi
Prove its CGI, oh wait. You can’t
You're a clueless robot, fact is that you can only get a curved shadow no matter the angle only from a sphere, you can't prove your schizophrenic thoughts are fact
@@Mayan_88694 Wake up, open your eyes, and maybe buy some glasses
@@Ziofalco so no evidence for your claim then, your claim is dismissed
Source: Trust me bro.
Half the planet asking, what's a phone booth?
You beat me to it! LOL!
That's hilarious.
While they’re googling it.😂😂
ruclips.net/video/fjytndcw9Jo/видео.htmlsi=6sLGdzsTgmeWtqj0
The other half are asking “what is the moon?"
Somehow the camera crew was there on the moon earlier to take the video. Good work.
Uuhm, those are animations... Actual footage was filmed by a little camera that was released during landing. But, that footage has to be beamed down, so will take a little while (if everything worked)
Yes of course and the cars we've been driving these past 100 years are really horses in disguise.
No they weren't, you must have been watching a Bugs Bunny cartoon.
@@Poepopdestoep /r/woosh
Oh okay. 😂@@Poepopdestoep
Nice to see the camera man casually on the moon waiting for the craft to land 0:39
Great accomplishment, but why wasn't video or pics of the descent transmitted live as they did 55 years ago with Apollo?
The cost. Budget is restricted these days. Stop complaining.
@@kennethkeen1234Lmao. $118 million and can't afford a camera?
Rrrriighhtttt @@kennethkeen1234
@@kennethkeen1234dumbass
Cause 2001 space odyssey director Stanley Kubrick recorded it in la studio. It’s very easy to livestream. 😂😂😂
You'd think someone would have been smart enough to rig up a camera to it and bring us some reall footage of it touching down, not more cgi crap.
not for 180million dollars....thats...extra.
You know what you don't do on a space mission? You don't pander to the whims of people that have no idea what is involved.
They did. The mission has failed. The lander has probably crashed, there is no data feed. They have some telemetry showing it ended up on the moon. Which, to some extent, is a success. But it doesn't send images or respond to commands.
@@nexpro6985 Nothing to see here! Yes we landed!! Take our word for it!! You can trust us, were not the Gov. Dude go and wash your face and wake up! Nothing is FACT until proven
@@nexpro6985 Yeah.. like live action cameras.
The Apollo 17 mission was broadcast live with ancient technology. Think about that! Why have we not seen the video even a few hours later.
Because no one has ever been to the moon.
Maybe we should also ask NASA where the moon landing Telem data is? I would love to see that
? Folks really need to understand what SWaP constraints can do to a lunar lander. Heard the same crap from uninformed nobodies even back when my country landed its Moon craft last year. Apparently all these f00ls missed the entire live image stream because they only watched the media coverage of the landing, not the actual livestream. Honestly, this world would be a MUCH better place if people just learn to read more and talk less. We already have the internet. All the information is RIGHT THERE. Ignorance is inexcusable at this point.
Maybe because the purpose of the mission is to land scientific instruments on the moon, not to provide you with entertaining video.
@@ToEuropa brainwashed much?
Let's find that flag and other equipment left by Apollo.
If they are in the right area, why not?
@@anthonywren8137 neither of you watched or listened to the video.
Wrong planet. You need to go to earth for that one😂
Find? It's still in the same spot.
@@eazye088 Yes Find! and take super high resolution photos of it, not a freaking overhead of tiny blurry dot.
It clearly looks real and since it's on the internet it has to be real.
😂
We believe anything governments and corporations tell us.
*_No crew members were on board. Sometimes I wonder just what is going through the minds of reporters or even IF they have a mind to begin with._*
One small step for CGI and AI 🥴
One giant leap for CGI and AI kind 🙄
😎👍
It's spelled C-G-I
@@somejerk1520 I don’t know the difference between CGI and AI?
@@No-Name-f8p Computer Generated Images vs Artificial Intelligence
@@somejerk1520 I’m going to change my comment to reflect CGI 🙌
no photo's of the landing, yet 50 years ago we got pictures of dear Neil stepping onto the moon...........just saying
Not for hours after they landed. The same will apply here.
@@grahamyates2490 not true. back in 1969, we had a live feed from the landing. I know, because i was sitting in front of our TV back then. Oh boy, young people today.......
@@wollie1211 not quite accurate.
There wasn't a live feed of the Apollo 11 landing itself.
The live feed began when Armstrong was descending the ladder but that was over six hours after they landed.
A little bit of basic research will confirm that.
@@grahamyates2490 also the TV Stations were not allowed a direct feed of the event! , They were givin a copy at very low rez. Good job on fooling the fools NASA. Millions of dollars for cartoons lol
Hollywood cameraman was also taken along with Armstrong who did his job excellent on moon.
Lets see the camera footage of it landing. They did on apollo and on the mars missions so where is it???
It's top secret.
Good thing someone was there with a camera to film the landing.
Its an illustration. You don't think that's meant to be a recording did you?
@@joshuawaddell9247He’s being sarcastic.
@@joshuawaddell9247and where is de real video? Ahhhh is true. All is fake
They actually launched a camera during the landing so it will collect a 3rd person view of the landing.
Yeah there’s a mini cube with a 360 camera on it that was launched (off the craft) to the surface during its landing burn.
Interesting: No mention of SpaceX.
Elon Musk was on duty at X
we need to see more than just loony tunes animations ...lets see some ACTUAL pictures of EARTH from there.....
It takes time to send video and image files. One, because live footage wasn't a priority on this mission and two, because they lost connection with it for a bit.
@@fast-toast go away plz get back in your box!!!
@@fast-toast yet they called the moon in 1969 in a split second with S-Band transmissions . Now it takes days 🤔 with far superior technology
@OGMeatball yes, but the apollo landing site was in direct "line of site" of the earth. This mission landed towards the south pole which also makes communication a problem.
You wouldn't believe them even with video proof.
Is everything in your orbit a fake?
And now the grainy black and white pictures will come flowing in. It's amazing with all the tech we have that we can't get real high definition pictures.
We have no pictures yet... lol
@@jasonjenkins7825It's definitely a conspiracy.
Even if there were 4k, you would not believe it.
@mad-meh2719 4K What ai generated images?
@@mad-meh2719Even if it was a 1 pixel image, you would believe it 😂😂
Ahhh the old astronauts on wires clips…
The kids these days don't even know what a phone booth is 😃
They had them to coordinate building of the pyramids. I learned that in public school.
What do you mean? They only started appearing about 300 A.D, priests invented them in an attempt to talk with god
They clearly don't know what "Van Allen Belt" is either! 😩🤦
@@frances4797 You clearly don't know what CGI is either 😩
Kids a phone booth is a lil room where Clark Kent use to change into Superman😂
That's why we never see Superman. No more phone booths.
Superman? Lmfao
Where does Supergirl change into her costume?
@@yootoober2009 My closet lmfao 😹
@@yootoober2009 ayo 👀
When I see something not cgi, I’ll consider believing it.
Been waiting for that since the late 60s :)
😂😂
Fuck yeah
No, when you see something not CGI, you'll say it's fake.
@@ToEuropano but you know when something is CGI or not
Why graphics looking like a 2010 video game 😂
fake,once again...a failed mission.
are you trying to say that this is "fake" or something? everything in this video IS cgi made by intuitive machines
they arent getting an incredibly strong signal right now and are trying to get footage and photos from the lander but its not their main priority
@@uflocyes, set to "deliberately bad" so that it would seem realistic. These boys are not devious, just want to do successful PR work, get paid and then forget the whole matter.
What the presenter did not mention is that at that place the moon night is 2 weeks, so after 1 week its small batteries will run out. Don't be surprised if 2 weeks later it comes back online (if its solar array receives sunlight) :P
@hellascommentor, Good one👍
It's nowhere near designed to survive the intense cold of the lunar night, it won't make it past two weeks sadly.
@@Krektonix Sad indeed... We can hope...
How did the astronauts of appolo 11 handle the cold and heat exposures in 1969 with the small backpack aircon and heaters of that day with the batteries of 1969??
@@claytonh4917they ate porridge every morning. Went to the film studio, and practised their lines of script. Really hard work!!
"over 50 years,..." Note to Editorial, this is the first time a Private spacecraft has landed on the Moon, which has never been done before.
It's been 50 years since a US Governmental spacecraft landed there, these are very different things that should not be conflated and mistrued.
relax dude, i knew someone would be down here complaining about it.
It's still American
They act like it such a huge goal like China and India aren’t on the moon and even then it wasn’t even a person. Complete fail for the United States. Brag when we put someone back on the moon.
where is the video of this moon landing that happened yesterday?@@jonnie2bad
Oh, so NASA is not involved? Better check your facts - this is not like a private business just did it on their own. Why do you think Houston Control was used.
NASA’s innate ability to do much meaningful for 50 years forced them to the private sector to land this to do NASA experiments.
This is not a sign of triumph, it’s a sign of decay in a major way.
Imagine 1969 mission had live footage ,and in 2024 we don't have live footage just animation. We are confirming things on radio.
We had those fantastic HD videos of Perseverance landing on Mars now we just get a grainy long distance shot on the moon. How long was the selfie stick???
I don’t know what kind of landing footage Odysseus has captured. Perseverance took several days to send the first video. 5 days IIRC
Imagine how disappointed the Apollo astronauts must be that we haven't gone back to the moon, let alone been to Mars.
Are we expected to fall for this again?
lol some will
People are too busy fornicating and researching celebrity gossip to question the big lies.
The cold will freeze the batteries?!? WOW JUST LIKE A TESLA HERE ON EARTH!!!!!!!!
Notice they didn’t say who’s booster took it there.
Why would they? Falcon nine launches happen very often, there wasn't anything unique or worth noting about the launch.
@@79_Au. "there wasn't anything unique or worth noting about the launch." except that it's payload was going to the moon...lololol
Did the boosters land on the moon? Now that would be news.
@@User5_ Exactly, the payload is what is noteworthy, not the Falcon 9. This video specifically focuses on the landing, not the launch.
yo daddy's
A perfect landing without photos or videos. LOL
Right... 😂😂😂
It takes a long time to send the files to earth. Unlike the apollo lander, it wasn't a priority to show the landing live so they didn't get an antena capable of beaming the information live. It also had tight weight restrictions.
@@fast-toast 😂😂😂😂😂
@@trademarksmoto what are the laughing emojis for?
@@fast-toastWAKE UP PAL. Go and wash your face put your big boy pants on! All your getting is their nice Cartoons of an event that DIDNT HAPPEN
How was the camera on the moon to catch the landing?
Well u would thought we will land next to a Apollo mission and prove once and forever.no chance..
The mission is to get data from the south pole of the moon. Why would they do anything other than that ?
Its not their task to prove to you basic knowledge
Forget it. There is no use proving stuff to nincompoops. Orbiters from other nations like India have already snapped pics of the Apollo 11 on the Lunar surface. Yet you are still here, aren't you?
@@nexpro6985 !d!0ts tend to think that the world revolves around them. So it is elementary for them to wonder why their objections to the reality of the Apollo landings are not being taken seriously enough by authorities to actually spend a few hundred Million $ to land right next to one of the Apollo descent modules.
Nevermind the fact that their next demand is going to be a Billion $ demand titled "I don't believe these new fake pics, take one of us there so that he can see it for himself and prove it to us", followed promptly by a Trillion $ demand titled "He was not one of us, take all of us there one by one."
If they landed right NEXT to the Apollo 11 landing site YOU would immediately invent another conspiracy...and YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING IS TRUE....
Private company that is beyond NASA? That's no coincidence.
Nasa is the best. Or at least the bestest, by hundreds of miles.
It's been 50 years and ONLY NOW your exploring the moon for samples of water 🌊💦 and ice 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
You know that you could also have been trying.
Yeah, because most of us have an extra $118 million lying around. @@djb5320
Why on earth has it taken so long??
On earth , you answered your own question mate
hey is it sending data at 1kb an hour? 2024 we shoukd have dozens of photos by now. Hi res color not bw 1960 monochrome
50 years ago man made a live video call to Earth.
Not a single picture?
Ha haha, Your cartoons are coming don't worry!! They need some more time to make them look even more BULLSHITE
Live feed was not their priority, just landing was, they are working on getting images right now, they will be released later today.
No telescope has ever been able to spot the moon as it is too bright for today's ultra-HD cameras and destroys the fragile chip surface. Nasa predict it will be back in a month when there's a full moon perhaps. Still to be confirmed.....
Nonsense. Even the engineers would have wanted to see nonstop footage. @@marymartin090
Too bad they didn't put a live camera on it the new ones now even focus
They put camera on their starman taking to space in tesla. Moon is less glamorous.
1:14 About the size of a phone booth...most people today would say "what's that". I'm old enough to remember.
The cameraman got no credit. He obviously landed first.
Private company. The moon is the new Wild West.
Funded by NASA. Therefore not private, but instead fascist corporatism.
Funny thing about the moon landings.... fifty years ago and the other missions longer than that. We were able to get live footage? And now fifty years later? No live footage? Just a weird peculiar state of affairs and facts... and i also am selling the brooklyn bridge if anyone is interested in purchasing it? The bidding will start at 1 dollar American. 😂
I was asking the same question, but then I thought about the political fallout if a lander should crash on approach, and the failed mission broadcast live all over the world.
Other nations are sending spacecraft to the moon and some of them don't like us. They would have a field day with the propaganda.
Still, I wish it was possible to do this and finally shut the moon landing deniers up once and for all.
I found the technology to film on the moon and I'm thinking about selling it for a low low price...🤗👆ok I'll tell 🤫slo mo in fact ckmy ch for real time 😂😂😂😂
The title and description are both wrong. A private owned company landed a spacecraft on the moon *for the first time ever.* It is the first time in over 50 years that a US-made lander has successfully landed on the moon.
What's your point?
Did it land? There is no evidence except a tiny hall packed with fans screaming. I suppose that is enough for Americans. The Taliban have higher standards.
@@stolidogmedia998US is a 3rd world country
Importing large swaths of third worlders has that effect. @@Gilvids
Most anticlimactic event in the whole history of the universe
yet you're here commenting!!!!
Your comment is 10x more significant than this story.
@@MrClaypogueso what? lol
Next to your birth, yes.
no. your comment was
Just like an electric vehicle, only good for a week due to cold weather affecting the batteries.
Well, they didn't have the uranium to make a reactor. And would a Briggs&Stratton lawnmower engine worked in a vacuum? :)
Chinese rover runs for years on the Moon's dark side.
@@mowcowbell You mean an RTG. Not a reactor.
Maybe you are unaware of heating or cooling :)
The surveyor landers in the 60's were the same way, only lasted bc a few days after landing.
The first US unmanned soft landing on the moon was in 1966 by Surveyor 1 (about 58 years ago). The Soviet Union beat this by a bit with a soft landing a little earlier the same year. Now, here we are all these years later trying to repeat history all over again with minor variations in launch vehicles and new, more modern technology. It makes one wonder why we stopped going to the moon.
We stopped because there's no money for that
A bit earlier by several months, US soft landing on the Moon June 2, 1966, and Soviet Union's Luna soft landing on the Moon 3 February 1966.
@@raptorwhite6468se detuvo porque kubric murió
@@alfredocardenasdelgadillo4277 You can't even speak English, as if your statement wasn't enough proof of your poor education
@@alfredocardenasdelgadillo4277 🤣👍
Yeah right ! We believe you !
Odysseus moon lander didn't have a live stream. But all the Apollo missions from '68-'72 did, as well as the Chinese Jade Rabbit in 2013. Even the Yutu-2 streamed a landing on the far side of the moon in 2018. Just another reason why the Americans keep trying to sanction China. They are clearly way behind in many aspects (notwithstanding it is still a good achievement).
The rover missions on Mars also had that. But maybe for some reason they didn't? Last time the indian one also didn't have life footage in fact even their footage when the craft was in space was very laggy. I think it all depends on the budget because even a single camera can increase the budget a lot and also the weight.
Obviously, no money for space, when Biden gave it to Ukraine for a loosing war!
@@pandibbarmanthe budget 😑😑😑 Hesus Christos! Did you hear what you just said!?!?!
@barman WTF, single camera, do you know how advance cameras sensors these days, and small and they become? Same with freaking transmission technology, there is smoothing fkn wrong/fishy with all these missions, I'm not specialist scientist, but these people always trying to hide something.
Well goodluck trying to send an high quality image from moon to earth live @@user-ir2fu4cx6p
Neil Armstrong: that’s one for man one giant for mankind
He was about to say we are on the set and then corrected himself to say we are on the surface. 🤔
FFS, are you serious with that shit? Is the Earth flat? Was the moon landing faked? Come on. Perhaps, you should study some science instead of conspiracy theories. Although, the dumbing down of people (especially in the U.S.) is on an exponential dive. I mean, when people refuse to wear masks or get vaccinated against COVID, the only conclusion you can draw is the people have become incredibly STUPID. A good (but, depressing) movie to watch is 'Idiocracy'. It use to be funny to me, but, now, it's just a documentary.
aliens: we warned you not to come back
man, there's so many space engineers in the comments "Just attach a live camera" " it should've had GoPro's on it" This is a private company and it's a lot of money.. I'm sure sure they probably don't care about filming a landing and just to prove it to you
yes, he was the only man on earth who wanted to see, so it would not have been worth the extra cost of a larger transponder from Amazon just to satisfy him. They did this film just for aesthetical reasons. Mothers like to be proud of their sons and no mothers were complaining except epic monkey's.
Did you tell her you might make a fool of yourself today? Don't worry, she will be proud anyway.
What?? wtf are you even talking about? I think you missed the whole point of my comment xD @@kennethkeen1234
With all our newTechnology since 1969 think we could do a fly over of one of the apollo landing sites? Or maybe get a high resolution photo from a satellite. 🧐🤔🙄
LRO images can be looked up and you can clearly see the footprints and the descent stages, equipment left behind, etc. It's been well over a decade since it's been available.
LRO has done that many times!
@@Davesworld7yes "you can clearly see the footprints"
but we can't see the spacecraft which in 4.2m tall so much smaller than the SPACEMEN who landed in 1969 with the biggest feet ever seen.
Remember? "One big foot" for usa, yes size ten feet and four inches - you can clearly see the footprints!!!.
This is a big deal, this is a small company that has acheived this success!
Seems odd to refer to a corporation as small.
The aliens kicked it over 😂
So, Burger King or McDonalds, the only race to the moon left
A half-century of technology and they send up a Model T that can't send back photos, big deal
It's too secret to show to the public. But it DID happen, as we all saw it on TV. My grandmother works at NASA, so had access to the LARGE telescope and could even see the dust particles cover the transponder window until the automatic windscreen wipers started up.
NASA keeping secrets from those who pay them, maybe it is time to fire Grandma.@@kennethkeen1234
@@kennethkeen1234thank you now athiest can finally believe the floating spaghetti monster floating in the sky is real😂
How did the astronauts of appolo 11 handle the cold and heat exposures in 1969 with the small backpack aircon and heaters of that day with the batteries of 1969??
Really?? Have you looked up anything about the suits they wore ?
@@geoffgunn9673 yes
The surface of the moon heats up to beastly hot, cools to frigid temperatures and then heats up again over a 29 day cycle. The Apollo missions were each on the surface for less than 48 hours so it was easy for Nasa to pick windows of time where the temperatures were reasonable for humans and their machinery.
The real challenge will be when humans are on the moon for weeks at a time.
Wait, I thought looking things up did not count as real research. @@geoffgunn9673
SpaceX was also involved in this adventure...
*They are the launch provider. These clips 0:09/1:37 showcases the lander being launched on a falcon 9 booster.
Nail biter?
No, Frodo destroying the ring was a nail-biter. This variety of fiction is tedious!
Any probe landing is a nail biter. Anything can go wrong. In this case, the primary descent navigation LIDAR system failed, so they developed on the fly, a software uplink to use two other laser systems installed on the lander to do the same job, although without the same precision. No guarantee that it would work. So, YES, a nail biter.
@@garyreed2206 Its a story, friend. There's nothing real about it, its just a satanic deception to keep you from the truth of there being a creator. I hope He gives you eyes to see, friend.
As opposed to constant closeups of a ring in someone's hand?
Good to see Miles O'Brien again. He was gravely injured in an accident a few years ago. Good that he's still working the job he loves.
He was on assignment for PBS in the Philippines in February 2014 when a heavy case of equipment fell on his left forearm.
It caused a nasty bruise, but not enough to stop O’Brien. He wanted to finish his stories and escape for a few days on a beach. The following night, his pain increased and O’Brien sought medical attention.
He was diagnosed with acute compartment system, a condition where his swollen muscles blocked blood flow in his arm. As he was getting ready for surgery, he searched the Internet for details on a diagnosis he had never heard before, and grew alarmed when words like “life-threatening” and “amputation” popped up.
Waking up after surgery, O’Brien’s first inclination was that he caught a break. He could feel his left arm, the fingers on his hand. But it was an illusion, a phantom limb. His arm was gone.
He checked out of the hospital two days later and spent more than a week in a Philippines hotel, finishing his PBS stories. In an extreme form of denial, the divorced father of two told no one what had happened, even his children. They were dark days, and he told Gupta he even considered suicide.
How did they get the picture of it landing.
We are so close now to having the first human step foot on the moon!
grammar in the title sucks, sounds like this specific spacecraft has landed on the moon before, 50 years ago, but this is the first time it's landed
Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure to the Moon!! 😃
Righteous!! 🎸🎸🎶🎸🎶
Good work camera man he made it there before the spacecraft just for recording this amazing video for us, smh.
Wtf? The 1st moon landing was televised live. After 50 yrs were back on the moon with no actual video? Played again. 😂😅
Ha ha
The camera man is still on the moon Huhh
IT WOULD BE REALLY NICE TO HAVE FREE HEALTH CARE AND CLEAN WATER FOR EVERYONE EARTH.
Our healthcare system is dangerous as we saw with the recent medical intervention.
No mention of the falcon rocket. That's just a falcon amazing, and elon should be like a little boy with Dream accomplished
Elon loves paying Carbon tax on his missile that shoots past the Van Allen belt
Now space x
With ZERO pictures of stars as usual.
You kids believe anything......
@@federalreservewolflegend3523 What do you mean zero pictures of stars. Why are stars relevant here?
@@federalreservewolflegend3523 dumbass 😂
What about foto or video?
space travel is the best instrument for money laundering ever XD
"We been going to the moon for a while and we need to continue it" 🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭💀
Space may be the final frontier but its made in a hollywood basement. Stanley Kubricks best masterpiece ever was the first space landing
ZERO proof it landed upright. At this point they don't' know...
Professionals don't need photos as proofs
they definitely have proof it landed upright, they have an entire mission control center with a bunch of telemetry and stuff
im pretty sure there would be a pretty obvious problem with the lander if they couldnt tell how it landed
They mean for the first time ever !
"But we still don't know if its in a good condition" says a lot - it crashed.😢😢😢😢😢 up side down is also up right position 😂😂😂😂😂
India reached the moon last year. It lost contact with the moon soon after landing.
However, both India and US celebrations are short live due to technical glitches.
2024 and we still have no real footage! Who da fuk was the cameraman 😂😂😂
Never seen that many adults cheering for an anime on a TV screen
What a joke, they actually think people would believe this ??
Do you have some reason not to?
No humans? Big Deal!
I do not agree, beautiful...absolutely....the privacy act should never have aloud this!.... A few up there have 100% Infact showed why camera to your bedroom or direction to your home are far more PROTECTED then the invention and absolute stunning unity and level of education, intuition and air space it takes to get there....
And the neighbour bringing over a pie sayingg "Hey! We are your new neighbours! Only three days away from Earth! No taxes! What a real estate deal, right?"
Time to pop on my tinfoil hat and enjoy the spoils of the US education system in this comment section!!! :))
in the 1990s we went to mars and pluto and they are still up uranus
That's funny, I came to enjoy the spoils of the us education system too like lack of critical thinking skills and the inability to recognize patterns of deceit
@@roachfamily2434 You've come to the right place!
I even saw a classic old school comment about there being no stars in the footage! :D
@@EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV when they reveal real footage of this event let me know, then we can go back and forth about conflicting astronauts' reports on the visibility of stars
@@roachfamily2434 What is the point? Even when they show the footage, you folks don't believe it. Your kind probably wouldn't even believe it if you were taken there physically. Probably will try to remove your helmet calling it a VR goggle, wanting to "see it for yourself". Now, human body can indeed survive a couple seconds in hard vaccum, but your eyes, not so much. And the lunar dust you inhale will probably be Karma for your sins, but even I don't wish something that painful upon you. Not that anybody is daft enough to pay a couple Billion $ to send someone as unimportant as you up there. So, like I said, there is no point.
So we sent people to the moon back in late 60s but with todays tech we can only send a remote controlled craft there lol
Yes, that's right. Comes down to safety and cost. Simple really.
@@anthonywren8137waste of money...affordable housing , homeless, starving africans kids, wars etc etc etc ........
The landing on the moon that nobody knows about
NOBODY CAN GET THROUGH THE FIRMAMENT........ MARBLES FOR BRAINS
Well done!
...and immediately puts a billboard ad on the moon.