Did anyone else see that first photo of “so called Meghan”lying on the delivery table. Her right arm up and extended with an IV and a very very full face smiling with a hospital hairnet on And very yellow blond hair wide highlights ? This was not Meghan! It was a Hollywood double. She had a bigger smile, fuller face and different nose and chin!! This was the surrogate!!!!!!! It only was on the internet briefly.
My cousin was a very close friend of Princess Margaret until her death, in fact, he was invited to her private funeral. As you are well aware, their where only three people who could get the Queen on the telephone without making an appointment, The Duke, The Queen Mother and Princesses Margaret. The craziness that Sunshine Saks puts out, concerning Markle is just insanity. Harry and Megan have no respect for the Crown. Even to the most casual observer of the situation would know they just lie!
@@mollyc9038 What a lazy comment. HMTQ was as imperfect as every mother since the dawn of time, but hardly cruel. She is a Head of State, therefore her children’s upbringing was as complex as the multifaceted role of their mother.
@@laralamb5866 No, no. As an American, and many other here in the United States will happily contribute to return first class tickets for the (now) California Mountbatten-Windsor's. Plus we have some spare Trumps---Donnie, anyone? Eric? Ivanka?
Meghan and Harry ONLY called their daughter Lillibet for COMMERCIAL REASONS - look at that disgusting Netflix series - the Harkles have deliberately COMMODIFIED both of their kids and trotted them out on that trash reality tv series to pimp out the kids. THey want little kiddies to be reality tv stars but then claim they left the UK for "privacy and to protect their kids from the media" What utter hogwash. It made me SICK to my stomach when Meg holds up baby Lillibet in front of a framed pix of Diana and says "That's your grandma" - again trying to link a connection for financial gain between her kids and a TRUE ROYAL HRH. I predict the Harkles will be doing infomercials on 2am tv and hawking weight loss products, vitamins and Bitcoin commercials to earn a living. All their big contracts have been cancelled - they are unemployable. This will all end in tears and tragedy.......
Megan's tacky choice in her daughter's name is simply signaling to her new Hollywood friends to say 'See look how close I am to royalty I can brazenly name my daughter after the Queen of England's pet name and still be congratulated for it."
She may find herself NOT being allowed in England for Diana's commemorative dedication next month. I find it very unlikely they will be invited to the Platinum Jubilee next year after all the lack of deportment skills and throughing mudballs at HMTQ. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
This must be extremely 'embarrassing' for the Queen. Hopefully, the Queen can now repay the compliment by taking away the titles that Meghan Markle so desperately wants to keep.
They named the baby after their “captor” (“the Royal family”)to whom they escaped.Who would name their baby after their so called “captor” or “warden”? They r manipulating pathetic humans.
I wonder how her mother feels (after all her daughter's ravings about being black) knowing that the child is called by 2 white woman's names and she doesn't even get a look in......but there's no money to be made in the name Doria.
This is a couple who chose to spend time with Elton John rather than with the elderly Queen on her birthday. Disgusting. They never miss an opportunity to treat the royal family with contempt.
They refused to spend the summer in Balmoral with the other royals, Harry didn't visit his grandfather when he was ill, when the poor man was on his death bed Harry dropped the Oprah interview on the royals... but now they want to honor the queen blablabla;.. no they want to make money with this kid. Naming her after the queen and Diana.. Meghan probably already has a clothing line ready.
I love that this video was 2 years ago, Lady C was spot on and completely accurate with her reporting of this story. It’s taken the media and the vast majority of the public to finally see the forest through the trees with regards to “lilibette” and the Harkles Con of the century! Spring 2024, will finally expose the truth behind the pregnancies/surrogacy. She called this all years ago! Hats off to you Lady C!!! 👏👏👏🙏🇺🇸🇬🇧
" Neglected, left alone to fend for ourselves,I had a truly terrible childhood with these people... But wait... Let's name our daughter after the head of that terrible organisation to which I was born into, as some kind of disturbing form of respect." Hypocritical fools. "Sharper than a serpents tooth, it is to have a thankless child" What an undeniable truth.
Considering the reports they used Prince George's security name for "their" son, no one should be surprised at this impertinence (putting it very politely.)
That's outwardly aggressive and supports my concern that Catherine and the children be kept far far away from this grifter. A knife for Christmas, what does that mean? It's blatantly obvious she is a danger to others, and PH is now, as well.
It was his pet name too .. he apparently called himself Archie & it stuck so the family nicknamed him Archie.. You couldn’t make it up - spiteful see you next Tuesdays
I immediatly thought that naming that baby lilibet was akin to stealing something sacred from the queen. that's how i felt about it and yes, i too was appauled at the act of it.
I read that the Queen had previously said Lillibet was her childhood nickname that she wanted to keep quiet & private and away from the public. She had not given permission for the baby to have this name. MM had said they had asked her and she had given permission. So which is true?
I know what you mean. But I truly believe that meghan sold him his Grandmother's name as a " Good Thing." I think Harry has so fallen for her " act" to impersonate his Mother that his Brain has really gone off the hook.
@@susanjohnson8396 I have been giving him the benefit of the doubt but he is almost 40 years old-not a kid anymore. I started feeling like it is enabling the narcissist by continuing to forgive his behavior and believing that it is not his fault - it is his wife’s fault because he is under her control. The only thing he has accomplished by marrying and believing that woman is that we all know the truth-he has a very low IQ, no common sense, cares about no one but himself and his lives up grandly to his new title-that of Dolt. And it really makes one appreciate the hard work of the Palace public relations team who had us all believing Harry was such a sweet, funny, person to be admired. He has just proven the importance of surrounding oneself with good people. He doesn’t know which way is up anymore and he doesn’t even have the brain power to remember his lies. Disgraceful! He needs his titles stripped. He is going to have a rude awakening I guess when he goes to England for his mother’s statue unveiling.
Who would name their child after a person you dont like? that you call racist, every time you hear and use that name a negative attitude would occur in the reset deep in your mind. This innocent child will come to know about all this negativity against her name . Oh mommy dearest, why why why ? may be a future echo out of the mouth of this child.
If her "color" is so important to her why did she not name her daughter after her mother...instead she's all about being royal the very thing she's "running" from.....you would think she would want her kid to be labeled as at least part black as well since it seems to be her whole identity ......she wears the label like a chip on her shoulder
Harry's wife cannot stand being black. She has shown that time and time again. She truly hates her heritage. And that's why I dont like her. She refuses to acknowledge her black mother in her babys name. Only the white people get a look in. Infuriating!!
@@linda8is I've started to wonder whether H has been hypnotised in one of his therapy sessions. He should be grieving the loss of his grandfather, instead of which he's doing everything possible to hurt his elderly grandmother who is grieving - it's so nasty, I just don't get it...
It's shocking & downright evil how she treated her own father who raised her & gave her everything she could want. To abandon him & cut ties with him when he's so ill is heinous. She deserves a good walloping with the karma stick for that alone.
I find it absolutely outrageous, I’m not surprised there’s cold fury at the palace. The fact that she has quickly bought the domain name proves that they intend to merchandise that baby to bits!
The baby was named after their “captor” (“the Royal family”) to whom they escaped. Who would name their baby after their so called “captor” or “warden”?
They are so stupid they don’t see they allow themselves to be owned, like slaves to the RF by their constant focus and building their lives around the RF🤣🤣
And he reminded us all he's a prince before getting on the bus, saying he had no cash for a ticket - us Royals don't. So much for walking away from the RF for a private life 🤣🤣🤣
I couldn’t agree with you more! As an American, I find it truly abhorrent to realize that another American could show such abject disregard for the Queen Elizabeth. Please don’t judge Americans by Meghan’s behavior. We deserve soooo much better, and so the British and the Royal Family.
Don't worry, we don't. We recognise narcissists when we see them. Just sorry that you've got lumbered with those pair of whiny woke hypocritical snowflakes who like to rename any criticism of their behaviour racism.
I don't judge but I am pissed off that they both continue to lie to the world omg this is sick mental problems both are sick I am 57 and these 2 brats create this harm it's bad
@@kristend344 To a narcissist no one is anything but an extension of themselves, a child, a friend, a spouse, an institution. Everyone exists for the sole purpose of serving them. The Narcissist believes they are the star in the movie of their life and everyone else is there in that movie with them as accessory to help make the life they believe they deserve become reality. Sadly, any child of a narcissist will be damaged beyond belief. Harry goes onto the screen and proclaims how damaged he was with his childhood, his children will be damaged as much or more then he. He should take those two children back to England, and the Queen could claim them.
@@brendakauffman2222 I had an immediate family member who was a covert narcissist. She's been dead for over 25 years, and the fall-out from her mind games continues. (I did not have a grave dance to the tune of "ding dong the wicked witch is dead". It was suggested.) I hope there really aren't any kids - because Haz's wife will make their life h3ll if there are. And Haz and his "genetic pain" he blames on his father (and grandparents) . . . he ain't seen nothin' . . . .
To us, the normal, sensitive people, the moment we saw 'Lilibet' on the Queen's card we knew that she was retiring her special name forever, to rest with Philip.
@Hawkwoman H I'm afraid you're right. Thank goodness there are plenty of compassionate people who understand, to compensate for the many who lack the subtlety to know what this is really about.
They say they are going to call her "Lili" - yet you know they are going to trot out "Lilibet" at every single possible chance. Or even "Lilibet Diana" ...
It would be great if millions of mothers to be name their babies Lilibet. That way it's not unique anymore. Google the name and thousands show up. Serves her right.
If I were a british citizen I would lead a campaign to collectively and dismissively refer to the child as Lil Doria! That would bury the actual given name as well as infuriate the mother! Lol Don't take it seriously, just kidding.
I am a R.N. who worked labor and delivery for a very long while. I believe we will find out someday Megan was not pregnant nor did she give birth. She is far too vain to ever allow her body to carry and birth a child. I saw that fake bump bounce around all the time - even sideways at times. Often it was too low or too high and changed sizes depending on the day. My opinion is she really doesn't even want to be a mother. They travel all the time. Never seem to spend time with the children or let them be seen in public. I think the announcement of the children amounted to pure competition with HRH Prince William and HRH Princess Catherine. I don't know who the children belong to but I do not believe they are Harry and Megan's. This is just my opinion based on my nursing experience and common sense. I'm sure you never have time to read these comments but I love to watch you and I will always say you are 100% correct.
We do so hope it will all be exposed...soon please.. she was never pregnant..allegedly they don't even live together..the King should insist on DNA on both kids. If he can find them?you have to ask? Why the scam? Who else is behind it? Markle is evil.
It is an outrage. It’s possible MM’s sycophantic supporters don’t understand how disrespectful using the name is but that is no excuse for ignoring how badly the Queen has been treated by the couple. I’m no royalist but - aside from the lack of respect - for *anyone* to trash their grandmother for cash all over the world and then use her private, personal nickname for their child is vile. I wish I’d written the choice down beforehand, as it was inevitable, I’m afraid and tells you everything you need to know about the parents involved. Grotesque.
@Micro Soft Terribly sorry if that’s what came across; I meant that the supporters I have listened to have not understood the way the Queen is addressed, the respect given to what little privacy she has and how not even her relatives, aside from the absolute few, would ever dream of addressing HRH by her nickname. I will rephrase if allowed to edit, otherwise please accept my apologies. Edit: have made correction, I should never comment and talk to my kids at the same time! Best wishes.😊
Agreed- the choice of baby names turned my stomach when I saw the headline. Feeling so sorry for our Queen in her time of mourning. The choice of names for both babies seems totally manufactured and actually unloving. What the actual hell are H+ wife trying to make ? The mind boggles ...
@@UntrainedAye Agree. Using the name, ‘Mountbatten,’ too is particularly strange and ill advised, why would you want to name your child with that of a known paedophile? I hope it’s for reasons of pomposity.
@Smith R. Absolutely. Exactly how the lies about titles were able to spread. The monarchy is a very odd, archaic organisation like the Anglican and Catholic Church and if one is outside of them, their customs and traditions can mystify and lend themselves to misinterpretation.
Dear Lady C. The one of the main things I have learned over my 73 years is that you “reap what you sow”. This couple does not want to find that we all grow old and will become insignificant in the future and will deal with adult children someday!
They will never call this child Lilibet. There was no need to ever call her that other than to shock and infuriate the family. This child will always be "Lili" and nothing more. Just another jab in the Queen's back because they are unhinged and at this point, stalking the Queen.
@@MoejiiOsmanTV and they could have done that with a simple "Lilly" without using Lilibet. They purely wanted the shock value and marketing value of using a name that the entire family knew as reserved for the Queen. For a couple that want privacy and to enjoy their freedom, they do everything they can to make sure they stay talked about by doing crap like this. It wasnt a tribute at all. It was a planned jab at a 95 yr old who, let's be honest, will most likely never meet this child in person.
The nickname for the late Queen was a personal, family nickname for her. To take that name for their child hit me the wrong way. It feels, to me, as if they took something that didn't belong to them.
It was a pathetic attempt to mend the relationship between them and the Queen by these two ingrates! That name was given to the Queen by her husband and only he and a few others were to call her that! Adding Diana as a middle name was deplorable! Neither the Queen or Diana would approve the use of these names! Charlotte has already been given the names! Harry stuck the knife in and Markle twisted it! It was a big "F*** You to the working Royals! Who will call this child but Harry and Meghan! Neither one has family or friends!
MM was so upset about not being able to use the name "Royal "" so she decided to use and abuse the Queen's pet name which was only used by her eloved husband, father, grandad and sister... ☹... so disrespectful....
The message is also , that the Queen didn’t want them to use “ Royal “ so Meghan says ok then I’ll use your private name and I’ll trademark it .CHECKMATE ! I can’t stand that Trollope She truly is a sociopath , she never met a rule she didn’t break ! Ugh
The BRF has a clear option. Deal with the evil two legally. And put a stop to them merching the BRF's names. Sue them BOTH for reserving the domain name. We the listeners would like to see the best lawyers handle this + shut them down.
@Lifesucks! Sodoesgoogle ....but I still think if you’re a woman in your nineties with an ill husband and extended family to consider, patronage’s to consider, and the welfare of a nation to consider....its kind of hard to go up against someone with no other considerations except themselves
@Lifesucks! Sodoesgoogle 100% right!! The Queen is softy and dignified. She didn't listen to the masses of the world to take the titles away from their importance them. It's too late in one way but not in another if only IF IF she steps down and hands the throne to William. Charles no I don't want him to be king because then the titles prince and princess will be given to them. William has no obligation to follow this "protocol" Now is the Queen going to listen to the masses???
I read The Queen had said after Prince Philip passed that the name Lilibet wasn't to be used again. After months of bashing All the RF almost daily to use that name.
De-bunking Harry and Megan lies | The Me You Can’t See debunking | Harry and Megan truth ruclips.net/video/uSWS3fQVx8A/видео.html ruclips.net/video/pEB_OnkEPas/видео.html
I’m feeling now, a year later, that the name for the baby was payback for not being able to use the word “Royal”. So she took another name for another purpose, with the same impertinence. It was pointed out to M that the word Royal didn’t belong to her so she took a more personal name because it was easy and seemingly up for grabs! No protocols around sensitivity. She’s a monster.
She’s awful! Apparently, demanded Prince Harry announce he was dating Meghan, or else she’d break up with him! Then they were engaged, then married at the wedding, she called a “spectacle”, claiming they got “married” 3 days before! Plus, the twice divorced Meghan, wore “virginal” white wedding dress with vail, that upset the Queen, and wanted to wear a certain tiara that Queen said no, and told her she could wear a different one, which, afterwards Meghan wanted to keep (wow, no way that would happen!), and she bullied Princess Charlotte too! Only her mother was there and many celebrities she invited, who didn’t know her (publicity and contacts for later on; Oprah, Clooney’s)! Red flags 🚩 all over! She had agendas! It was a slap 👋 to the Royal Family what she’s done! She’s mentally disturbed and emotionally unstable with NPD and Histrionic disorder, etc.! Prince Harry is not well, too!
Your observation is gigantic, and I think you are so so spot on. Thank you for that. I do not believe these children exist. I don’t believe Megan was ever pregnant. She’s far too selfish for that, so who is the egg whose sperm who conceived, who carried who delivered to these children, DNA, DDA, DNA,DNA
You are so right that's exactly what she did she stole Lilibet off the casket totally for spite why didn't she use doria in any form of her child's name remember when she said never mind I don't want to stir her up because she believes Charles is weak
Correct, they could have actually named her Lili and privately ( and keep it private) the let the queen know it was a nod to her. That would have been a nice thing to do.
@@lesleyriseam1282 - yes MM is a nasty piece of work - despite the pearly white smile - she is vindictive to the core. The only way with people like that are to ignore them
I read that Harry registered this name Lilibet so no one will be able to use it. Too bad HMTQ didn’t do this, but she couldn’t have imagined her grandson would do such a thing
I've read that they've made a domain on LilibetDiana.. They'd like to own the copyright on Lilibet but let's hope one of the Royals grabbed copyright and domain name first
@@barbaratrust149 the Tiara is the Crowns property not up to Meghan to decide which hugely important intimate objects of jewellery made for the Queen of England not a twice married has been.
God save the queen 👑 Lady c. There’s a surrogate mother situation going on !!! I was told the young girl isn’t wanting to give up the babe ...my friend is a nurse at Santana Barbara cottage hospital she said mm never came there to give birth....
I adore Lady C for her honesty, her eloquence, and her passion for the truth. If I could choose just one person on the planet to spend an afternoon with, sipping tea whilst conversing openly, sharing ideas and views - it would be Lady C. No doubt about it.
I agree that both children have surrogate mothers, and I hope that it all comes ot soon, as MM is quite the piece of work. Keep an eye on these children, because they may not be in agood situation. I pray that this mystery will be revealed.
Because they didn't get what they wanted. They therefore set out to destroy everything the other Royals have. It is jealousy..green eyed monstrous & growing by the day.
@@giftyotchere1274 I think you are so right. I also think that if they can help the queen along, it will be easier for them to take down the monarchy. Long live The Queen 🇬🇧
“You don’t own the word Royal, you don’t own the word service and guess what, I now own the words Lilibet Diana”. What a piece of work. That poor, poor baby.
I wish the Queen would stop this comedy by legally starting to protect the Royal Family from any form of trolling and bully behaviour. Harry’s wife running a silent war which is not only blatantly vulgar but noticed by all of us. Time has come in my opinion when the Queen needs to put these two to their place.
Take the titles. I mean to say, calling that ridiculous American 2nd-rate actress 'Duchess' is laughable. She was a total failure in her role as a duchess, excruciatingly embarrassing. There was nothing anyone could do to help. She was just too stupid.
@Lisa Perkett Now is Charle's and William's chance to really take the crown by the jewels, if you know what I mean, and really tell these two traitors how it's going to be. They should actually threaten legal action against them and threaten to jail them both for treasonous and treacherous behaviour. They have conned, lied, deceived, manipulated and BS their backsides off since the 18th May, 2018!!! The minute they were married everybody started seeing the FAKENESS of these two muppets.
I agree, at the time my first thought that calling the child Lilibet was extremely impertinent! ANYBODY that has an inkling of good etiquette knows not to intrude and insult anybody by calling the child anyone's pet name let alone the Queen's pet name. Terribly rude! That name was a loving personal term from the Queen's father to his daughter, and that woman should not have high -jacked it for her child.
Don't believe its official... someone combed CA state birth records and for that day believe only Elizabeth Diana (forget what the order was) showed up in birth records.
@@VikingFrog Believe that's whats in the CA birth records... like Diana Marie Elizabeth M-W shows up, no one has found Lilibet name used officially. But certainly run with it in public and registered any, many domain name variants of Lilibet after she was born.
Honesty is important if one wishes to be likeable and respected. No one would care if the couple used surrogates for their children, but we hate being manipulated by lies and fake moonbumps. If they really do not care about titles, then why not be honest about their births? A surrogate birth won't matter if titles don't matter....but, as we know, titles actually do matter to Meghan.
In this day and age of leaks and easily decimating information, seems to me that someone, somewhere would have leaked details and knowledge about a surrogate being used, in The UK and the US. That kind of secret and potential media bombshell would be impossible to keep under wraps. Also, think about the potential vulnerabilities like blackmail that carrying out two fake pregnancies would risk? For this reason, I don’t believe a surrogate was used.
De-bunking Harry and Megan lies | The Me You Can’t See debunking | Harry and Megan truth ruclips.net/video/uSWS3fQVx8A/видео.html ruclips.net/video/pEB_OnkEPas/видео.html
Yes, the money would have been made using Doria Diana or Diana Doria. The current market noise would be loud! Using Lilibeth was a way of giving the Queen the finger. By next week, the name will no longer be unique. There will be thousands of Lilibeth Dianas born in this world.
My immediate reaction, after shock, was disgust, that woman respects no-one and she'll throw shade over anyone. I knew from day one that she has no regard for anyone but herself. This baby, like the first, is nothing but another product for her to market. Why else register the name to copyright them? Sad to say I also think her mother, Doria, was only ever the "token black" for Meghan to make herself look good and compassionate and woke.
The fact that they created a new domain is proof that they'll be making money from her name with is beyond scary and shows that their plan was NOT a nod to the Queen!!!
I am adamant it’s like poring salt into a wound that hasn’t healed, and is still hurting. Most expectant mothers register at a Baby Store, not registering domain names. I was busy counting fingers and toes, not calculating how much money my baby was going to bring in. They are rotten to the core
I have a very cold feeling that "little boy Archie", is going to fade away. The alleged mother bought a bracelet or a watch, quite some time ago specifically for her future daughter. It was also engraved.
Lady Campbell, even if the birth of Lillibet is surrogate or what, is Meghan Markle the first? Why hating the lady with much hate? There are so many things you should focus your attention to than Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. How much did they pay you? Are you a witch? Stop witch hunting this couple. You are never perfect. Enough of your running them down.
Its all about the money.. It wasn’t appropriate to decide on the name without the Queen’s permission. It’s just sickening the damage they are doing to Royalty. I feel very sorry for their children. They have isolated them from a family and that’s very sad 😢
Apparently Prince Harry did ask the Queen for permission to name their daughter after her, and she said it was OK, thinking it’d be Elisabeth, not “Lilibet” (her private, personal name)! Royal children are usually named after ancestors, not abbreviated names or nicknames!
My heart goes out to the royal family - there is no end to the odiousness of this woman that they are saddled with. And I do feel sorry for the innocent children.
The RF need to do something about these two. "Doing nothing" reminds me of when Diana died and the backlash they received from the press and the public.
Do you really believe Archie, and now their new "daughter" actually live with them? IMO they are both on loan for photo ops and nothing more. Those two are so self centered they couldn't possibly make room for children in their lives.
Odious creatures! Using their child as a tool to insult their family. Harry seems to have already failed to project poor Lilibet from his “genetic pain.”
this is intentional and more than impertinent - using the pet name the Queen's father and husband had for her is a big FU to the Queen! what a horrible person H's wife is - bullying a 94-year-old woman weeks after her husband died.
If she was not really pregnant why did she ruin Eugene 's big day by announcing she was pregnant .Shame on you Megbeth and Hazzard for taking away spotlight from the bride
Because if you notice, she tries to overshadow everything the RF do? Look at all the announcements it does just as one of the family does something. Markle should be tucked away in an institution somewhere with high fences all around..
This is definitely not an olive branch. Reconciliation demands that amends be made. A public apology for their egregious misbehavior would constitute an acceptable FIRST step toward making amends.
Don't worry nothing will happen to rent a child it stays with it's mother until needed in between where is a realistic baby doll for money or title You can buy anything and no One is the wiser
@@GCMC-m2h watch for mysterious illnesses to pop up. I am certain this child will be a victim of Munchausens by Proxy, therein rendering Meghan a victim/martyr/hero. Anything for attention. You read it here first!
Wonder if they used their own genetic source or had to get a donor for fertilization. That is the true reason for having surrogacy if there is an infertility issue or problems with implantation or maintaining the pregnancy to full term. Not for vanity reasons as is the current trend amongst celebrity women. Is the surrogate the wet nurse too.If the egg was donated then their would be no issue with color of the children and she could thumb her nose at the Royals.
They licensed the name Lilibet the moment the poor child Was delivered to them. So roll out Lilibet clothes,books, to name a few ! This is just disgusting and the final betrayal
It just angers me that Harry and his wife have disrespected his sovereign and his grandfather like this. The Queen has few enough areas of her life that are private. For something so close to her heart to be used like this so blatantly.
De-bunking Harry and Megan lies | The Me You Can’t See debunking | Harry and Megan truth ruclips.net/video/uSWS3fQVx8A/видео.html ruclips.net/video/pEB_OnkEPas/видео.html
I was HORRIFIED when I heard the name, my stomach turned. It shows how deeply and willfully ignorant Meghan is of English culture and our respect for Her Majesty, our tradition, and any sort of decorum (even if one isn't Royalist). She may have thought it was a subtle 'two fingers up', but I don't think she fully understood how many people (with basic common decency. let alone respect for an Ancient Monarchy), would have been appalled by such a crass spectacle. The sad thing is, I thought Harry was a bit easily led but not willfully disrespectful to his family, but after THIS... he would have fully understood the unforgivable transgression... Meghan really has him under her thumb, but she truly has no comprehnsion of the family she's dealing with. She may be smart but she's no Diana... Diana knew the nuances of the game she was playing.
Taking the piss out of the Queen. Since her kids have no titles, she lost her position.....she digs in even further...using the Queens and Diana’s name to perpetuate her own status and continuity through her kids. She has calculatingly engraved it into everyone’s minds. Lest no one forget....
When Charles becomes king all his grandchildren who don't alrdy have titles will become prince n princess aka Archie n Lilly u Muppets learn ur history
Meghan Markle must be erased permanently from the Royal history books.. a woman who sneakily conned and faked her way into the world's most famous family... hellbent on trying to destroy them... time to get rid of them once and for all!!
Poor Lili, she is used as an huge middle finger to the Queen. What an awefull start! I wish her strength and luck and a very kind, gentle, caring and protective Nanny!!
@@clairelouise4063 I think any loving nanny will be sacked, just listen to Lady C's description of how her narc mother got rid of nannies that she and her siblings loved.
I'm still having a difficult time believing that MM was ever pregnant. I'm also having a difficult time believing that they have any children. When they do release a photo of their "children" facial features and hair color changes, this is not possible with out surgery due the the radical changes to the facial features Archie displays. It has also been proven that Lilibet's birthday photo was someone else's child. No birth certificate has been proven for Lilibet, the hospital they named has no record of her ever being there. The hospital staff has stated that they have no record of any babies being born on the day in question. It has also been proven that the children have never been to Great Britain due to the flight manifest being released. Only H & M were on the manifest. Please help explain this
Same here. I saw the video on you tube of the moonbump around her knees. No wonder she didn't want the Royal doctors involved in the pregnancy or the birth. I don't know about Lillibet but it wouldn't surprise me if they are lying about that as well.
Wow, I call women of that nature a gutter snipe too, thank you for bringing that really traditional label back. Young people wouldn't get it at all, but older people understand the label.
The words "trusted care' are thrown into the announcement as a threat to the staff to keep their mouths shut about anything - no talking in the hallways , right M
I would think that one would be so "in love, so beholden " by the birth of their sweet little baby girl that nothing else would be on their mind. Harry and his wife thinks of licensing the baby name, thought it was appropriate to steal a term of endearment from their husbands, mourning grandmother, who just happens to be the Queen of England, who made it clear after her beloved husband died, that her pet name was no longer to be used!
@@paulk8195 this ungracious grandson is not only badmouthing our beloved Queen but also our monarchy and our nation to the world, while whining that he isn't being paid by us for doing so.
What's going to happen now is every second girl born in America and through out the world will be called lilibet now, making it no longer unique but just cheapening the name that was so special to our Queen!
@@carolynsimpson412 U hv great foresight. Think she’ll be laughed at & made fun of with such long name. In America they don’t give a hoot to pomposity. Poor child 🧒
I do fear the sins of the fathers and mothers will be laid upon this poor dear child. I can only hope that she partakes of the strength of Prince Philip's lineage as his daughter Princess Anne and be able to call a spade a spade and not be troubled by Trifles or trifling people . Pray to the Lord🙏
I blame Judge Warbly for the despicable behavior of the Harkles. When Warbly issued Summary of Judgement in Rachel’s favor, Warbly basically gave the Harkles the green light too do as they please in spades.
Yes the Judge has certainly lessened my once pride in British Justice. He has gone the way of the woke. Only know and speak “their truth” not the actual truth.
De-bunking Harry and Megan lies | The Me You Can’t See debunking | Harry and Megan truth ruclips.net/video/uSWS3fQVx8A/видео.html ruclips.net/video/pEB_OnkEPas/видео.html
Dear Lady C, since the Queen has legal rights custody over her grand and great-grand children, does she possess any legal rights to the official names of them? In other words, could she have the legal name changed of the latest great-grand baby? Thank you for giving voice to the upset and frustration of millions around the world.
Only over the grandchildren, not the great-grans. And this 18th c. legal prerogative would have to go through Parliament and would not stand up in a court of law.
Mariat 108 I was sure I heard this in the news about the Queen having custody of the grands and greats and when megain signed legal papers, she knew this. So Lady C, how are they getting around this? If H dies, what happens to the children?
The Children’s Act was enacted in 1989...there’s no royal exemption within the act....so I think Harry and Megan retain custody. It may really depend on how close they are in the line of succession. It would be really interesting to understand the legalities
@@cch9680 that is true, they don't really seem bound by normal decency. So maybe they would have done this anyway and upset Philip too. All so unnecessary, if only there wasn't such a shortage of names available in the world.
Stealing the Queen's nickname is revolting. Pound another nail in the coffin of Harry's relationship with his family. Poor Queen Elizabeth, having to put up with this trash. Charles and William must be furious and who can blame them?
Yes & if they think the press has been negative up to NOW, if HM the Queen passes sooner rather than in a year or two (long live The Queen 💞) THEN The Queen's untimely passing WILL BE attributed to this foul & vile disrespect that h & mm have shown to Her Majesty 💞😪
I saw a comment on a other video drawing attention to when Megan said that the Queen does not own the word 'royal' and now she is taking the Queen's name away from her as well.
Had exactly the same thought, a spiteful way to get back as they did with that statement re the word ‘royal’. They are transparent, but think the rest of us are stupid. We can all see what they’re up to.
It made me feel sick too and still does. It's as if they have stolen the most precious and personal thing between her and Philip. It does not belong to the Queen anymore, it is now a cheap commodity. It must have been like a stab through the heart for the Queen. What a great way to injure the Queen, yes H's wife is evil incarnate.
Its heartbreaking that they've taken such a special name from the Queen, I didnt realised that they've merched it, I read that she's invited Harry to lunch & also they've been invited to the Jubilee..... it would ruin all the Events planned, all the Booing & rotten eggs & tomatoes that will be aimed at this Cruel couple
It is Elder Abuse Of The Queen; The Queen is 95 years old; When you steal something of monetary value from a elderly person; it is abuse; When they registered this name as a trade name it became a crime; In taking something of value from a Elderly person they value; You are stealing; Causing Mental distress is elder abuse; This woman even if she is The Queen still has feelings; She has just buried her beloved husband only few weeks ago' Has Harry even once thought about the Mental Health of his Elderly 95 year old Grand-Mother. Even Though She Is The Queen of England her heart has to be still breaking from lost of her Husband.
Now that she has trademark the name, she owns the queens name. This quite literally is the biggest FU. It’s just so sick and demented to use a child and innocent this woman is vile.
HM's life is well documented in photographs, films, videos, letters, and other documents. Should the queen decide to file a copyright claim, she could well have a claim to "Lilibet."
@@booperpotpie9634 The last time I saw Lilibet was hand written by the Queen on the personal wreath, for her beloved husband on the day of his funeral. You couldn’t make this saga up!
@@booperpotpie9634 YES YES PLEASE DO . LETS ask Lady C & if she says NO, find someone willing and able to fight this. WE too as the Queen have been violated- tho to a lesser degree-- but violated all the same and WE CAN fight back without a loss of dignity. Actually, we gain back our and the Queen's integrity and dignity. As they say-- NO ONE CAN TAKE YOUR SELF-RESPECT unless u give it to them. PLEASE see what you can do. I'm NOT tech savy or on social medis so PLEASE reach out and put your excellent idea in motion. Give it legs!!😊
I just think it’s shocking how detached they are from reacting. A true class that our culture doesn’t really enforce. As much as I want the Queen to do something, I also applaud her for carrying on; Meghan wants a reaction.
@@christinacatalano There's a big difference between reacting and responding. People are frustrated by the responses, both content and lack thereof, from the Queen and RF.
I noticed that in the Cambridge's message of congratulations, they referred to the baby as just "Lili". Of all the headlines and messages I read on that day, this was perhaps the only one that made no mention of the baby's given name, "Lilibet". I believe this was William's polite but loaded way of expressing his views on the matter.
What a relief to hear from a lady who is capable of speaking English properly. Quite correct, of course: children are born, if the issue of the mother's body, "to" and not "for".
Most true mothers would never use their dear baby daughter in such a way....to be vicious to an old great grandmother.
Did anyone else see that first photo of “so called Meghan”lying on the delivery table. Her right arm up and extended with an IV and a very very full face smiling with a hospital hairnet on And very yellow blond hair wide highlights ? This was not Meghan! It was a Hollywood double. She had a bigger smile, fuller face and different nose and chin!! This was the surrogate!!!!!!! It only was on the internet briefly.
Where did you see this
@@heidipetals462 RUclips news. As soon as we heard she had a girl
Karma will get them
Exactly!
My cousin was a very close friend of Princess Margaret until her death, in fact, he was invited to her private funeral. As you are well aware, their where only three people who could get the Queen on the telephone without making an appointment, The Duke, The Queen Mother and Princesses Margaret. The craziness that Sunshine Saks puts out, concerning Markle is just insanity. Harry and Megan have no respect for the Crown. Even to the most casual observer of the situation would know they just lie!
A good comment made today: "If you don´t like it here in the UK, walk into California Sunshine and...stay there!"
That shows you how she felt about her children. She pat them on the head like a dog.
@@mollyc9038 What a lazy comment. HMTQ was as imperfect as every mother since the dawn of time, but hardly cruel. She is a Head of State, therefore her children’s upbringing was as complex as the multifaceted role of their mother.
@@laralamb5866 No, no. As an American, and many other here in the United States will happily contribute to return first class tickets for the (now) California Mountbatten-Windsor's. Plus we have some spare Trumps---Donnie, anyone? Eric? Ivanka?
@@anneterry3660 Sadly for the US, you got Biden which is not really much of an improvement. What do you think?
Harry is just so excited at the thought of sleeping with a woman pretending to be his mother is beyond sick
@@ichibonfriend2923 no, Diana didn’t merchandise stuff and she at least was always respectful of the Queen.
Yes!!! Isn’t it disturbing & sick to think H’s wife is the reincarnation of his mother?? 🤮 Yuck.
Meagan got her talons deep into Harry's trauma.
Ewww
Lots of men ' marry their mothers' / unconsciously seek a partner who resembles their ' mother figure'. Women do likewise .
Harry is not unique.
The use of a private nickname, when she completely tried to destroy the firm and all it stands for. Disgraceful!
Meghan and Harry ONLY called their daughter Lillibet for COMMERCIAL REASONS - look at that disgusting Netflix series - the Harkles have deliberately COMMODIFIED both of their kids and trotted them out on that trash reality tv series to pimp out the kids. THey want little kiddies to be reality tv stars but then claim they left the UK for "privacy and to protect their kids from the media" What utter hogwash. It made me SICK to my stomach when Meg holds up baby Lillibet in front of a framed pix of Diana and says "That's your grandma" - again trying to link a connection for financial gain between her kids and a TRUE ROYAL HRH. I predict the Harkles will be doing infomercials on 2am tv and hawking weight loss products, vitamins and Bitcoin commercials to earn a living. All their big contracts have been cancelled - they are unemployable. This will all end in tears and tragedy.......
In Spanish, we have a saying: "Tell me what you brag about and I'll tell you what you lack of" I think it suits mm perfectly
Exacto!
A esa vibora le falta la decencia básica humana
I like that saying!
Well she she still believes she's going to become a Hollywood star lol. That Oompah interview was her disguised way of being in a film.
And my mother had a saying Show me the company you keep and I'll tell you what you are.
that the Queen would have to endure this nightmare at this stage of her life is just too much.
And, right after she lost her husband. So unspeakably cruel.
Absolutely.
her woke comrades have just insulted her by taking her portrait down at Oxford University. These people are just hideous beyond belief.
For a couple who preach compassion they sure don't know how to show this to their own families
@@joycegibbs5267 Do you mean the Queen's portrait?
Megan's tacky choice in her daughter's name is simply signaling to her new Hollywood friends to say 'See look how close I am to royalty I can brazenly name my daughter after the Queen of England's pet name and still be congratulated for it."
Uurgh i don't even want to press like on your comment it made my skin crawl so so true
She may find herself NOT being allowed in England for Diana's commemorative dedication next month. I find it very unlikely they will be invited to the Platinum Jubilee next year after all the lack of deportment skills and throughing mudballs at HMTQ. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
Exactly she always makes sure everyone knows that she can pick up the phone and call the Queen. They are beyond redemption.
@@charliesmith_ yes, I noticed that.
@@ameliaclark5792 No she can’t, that was another lie .
Meghan weirdly held her "bump" in every photo for the entire duration! Of course she did! She was holding it in place! 😮
This must be extremely 'embarrassing' for the Queen. Hopefully, the Queen can now repay the compliment by taking away the titles that Meghan Markle so desperately wants to keep.
I so hope she does!
Please do sweet queen!
Or maybe the queen could name a horse or corgi Meghan 😂😂
@@barbarahodgkinson2765 Corgis are too cute and horses are too valuable... perhaps an old billy goat? 🐐
@@barbarahodgkinson2765 the creatures real first name is Rachel & she hates it! ‘Run RacHell run RacHell shift your ruddy ****.
Strange how she called the Royal family racist but she calls her daughter after alleged racist. Im infuriated by this.
They named the baby after their “captor” (“the Royal family”)to whom they escaped.Who would name their baby after their so called “captor” or “warden”? They r manipulating pathetic humans.
I wonder how her mother feels (after all her daughter's ravings about being black) knowing that the child is called by 2 white woman's names and she doesn't even get a look in......but there's no money to be made in the name Doria.
100%
You are not alone! The world sees thru their PR stunt! They are only trying to stay in the news and holding onto the Royal Family's coattails!
Silent Doria
This is a couple who chose to spend time with Elton John rather than with the elderly Queen on her birthday. Disgusting. They never miss an opportunity to treat the royal family with contempt.
And YET, they named the baby after Queen Elizabeth’s nickname. It makes no sense if you just go by what they are saying. They think we are all idiots.
They also didn't go to Sandringham to spend time with One family member, whom would have been invited by The Queen.
Always scamming!
They refused to spend the summer in Balmoral with the other royals, Harry didn't visit his grandfather when he was ill, when the poor man was on his death bed Harry dropped the Oprah interview on the royals... but now they want to honor the queen blablabla;.. no they want to make money with this kid. Naming her after the queen and Diana.. Meghan probably already has a clothing line ready.
Auntie Elton
I love that this video was 2 years ago, Lady C was spot on and completely accurate with her reporting of this story. It’s taken the media and the vast majority of the public to finally see the forest through the trees with regards to “lilibette” and the Harkles Con of the century! Spring 2024, will finally expose the truth behind the pregnancies/surrogacy. She called this all years ago! Hats off to you Lady C!!! 👏👏👏🙏🇺🇸🇬🇧
" Neglected, left alone to fend for ourselves,I had a truly terrible childhood with these people... But wait... Let's name our daughter after the head of that terrible organisation to which I was born into, as some kind of disturbing form of respect." Hypocritical fools.
"Sharper than a serpents tooth, it is to have a thankless child" What an undeniable truth.
Form of restect? No. They feel that they overstepped the line and are trying to crawl their way back to the Crown.
@@kv1815 They picked the WRONG way to go about it. HMTQ is not pleased.
Pitiful attempt to gain benefits from the family they have disrespected so badly.
So well said 👏👏👏👏🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
Hypocritical parasites at this point staying attached to that family.
They should just have called her Lily and not Lilibet, the disrespect shown towards Her Majesty the Queen is just outrageous!
That’s what I was thinking too.
My opinion too, spelled Lili, as an affectionate nod to her great grandmother's "Lilibet" nickname.
@@elainebrumage9396 The incorrect spelling of Lili just presses my buttons even more
@@elainebrumage9396 Yes ; LiLi' is the nickname. They make me sick.
Or Lillian.
Considering the reports they used Prince George's security name for "their" son, no one should be surprised at this impertinence (putting it very politely.)
REALLY!?!
That's outwardly aggressive and supports my concern that Catherine and the children be kept far far away from this grifter. A knife for Christmas, what does that mean? It's blatantly obvious she is a danger to others, and PH is now, as well.
They are always stealing other
people’s identities. Classic narc!
What the F?!
It was his pet name too .. he apparently called himself Archie & it stuck so the family nicknamed him Archie..
You couldn’t make it up - spiteful see you next Tuesdays
I immediatly thought that naming that baby lilibet was akin to stealing something sacred from the queen. that's how i felt about it and yes, i too was appauled at the act of it.
Nothing original
Does the name not honor the Queen?
@@deloreslomonaco570 no it does not.... especially when her Majesty specifically said the name was not to be used again.
I read that the Queen had previously said Lillibet was her childhood nickname that she wanted to keep quiet & private and away from the public. She had not given permission for the baby to have this name. MM had said they had asked her and she had given permission.
So which is true?
Another Meghan lie, she ok the name to aggravate the Queen and to tie the girl to the monarch for future monetising
This act should convince all, for once and for all that Harry is as much a villain as his crass wife. No more mercy for either of them.
I know what you mean. But I truly believe that meghan sold him his Grandmother's name as a " Good Thing." I think Harry has so fallen for her " act" to impersonate his Mother that his Brain has really gone off the hook.
H is culpable up to his eye balls & beyond! H is a sick, self centered, spoiled brat. Stupid too.
@@susanjohnson8396 I have been giving him the benefit of the doubt but he is almost 40 years old-not a kid anymore. I started feeling like it is enabling the narcissist by continuing to forgive his behavior and believing that it is not his fault - it is his wife’s fault because he is under her control. The only thing he has accomplished by marrying and believing that woman is that we all know the truth-he has a very low IQ, no common sense, cares about no one but himself and his lives up grandly to his new title-that of Dolt. And it really makes one appreciate the hard work of the Palace public relations team who had us all believing Harry was such a sweet, funny, person to be admired. He has just proven the importance of surrounding oneself with good people. He doesn’t know which way is up anymore and he doesn’t even have the brain power to remember his lies. Disgraceful! He needs his titles stripped. He is going to have a rude awakening I guess when he goes to England for his mother’s statue unveiling.
Exactly right.
Who would name their child after a person you dont like? that you call racist, every time you hear and use that name a negative attitude would occur in the reset deep in your mind. This innocent child will come to know about all this negativity against her name . Oh mommy dearest, why why why ? may be a future echo out of the mouth of this child.
If her "color" is so important to her why did she not name her daughter after her mother...instead she's all about being royal the very thing she's "running" from.....you would think she would want her kid to be labeled as at least part black as well since it seems to be her whole identity ......she wears the label like a chip on her shoulder
Or her wonderful jam making grandma!!! Oh, I forgot, there is no money to be made from her side.
Yes! How about LaToya? LaQuinta? Etc
She did H1W was called Flower, you know bambi and thumpers friend. Google Flower.
Indeed! Why didn't she call her Shawniqua Doria Jermajesty?
Harry's wife cannot stand being black. She has shown that time and time again. She truly hates her heritage. And that's why I dont like her. She refuses to acknowledge her black mother in her babys name. Only the white people get a look in. Infuriating!!
Don't give Harry a pass on any of this. He is just as culpable.
I think Harry is even worse than her because he is going along with it and supporting her. Definitely a two finger sign to the Queen....
I have often thought Harry has some form of special needs.
@@linda8is I've started to wonder whether H has been hypnotised in one of his therapy sessions. He should be grieving the loss of his grandfather, instead of which he's doing everything possible to hurt his elderly grandmother who is grieving - it's so nasty, I just don't get it...
On this one, much more so; he could have REFUSED but she has her hooks IN HIS JAWS!
Both of these awful people have gone way past the point of no return to the Royal Family and deserve no consideration at all from the UK !
I’m also very sad about Meghan’s dad who raised her and did everything and more her. She’s pure evil
at the least pay his medical bills privately...her father made it possible for mm to maintain her lifestyle...
I don't have any negative feelings towards her Father...I think ALL the bad genes came from her jailbird druggie Mother
It's shocking & downright evil how she treated her own father who raised her & gave her everything she could want. To abandon him & cut ties with him when he's so ill is heinous. She deserves a good walloping with the karma stick for that alone.
Evil indeed.
I agree.
I find it absolutely outrageous, I’m not surprised there’s cold fury at the palace. The fact that she has quickly bought the domain name proves that they intend to merchandise that baby to bits!
Dont't buy any of their products - they are tainted with malice and wickedness.
@@user-ix9wx6ms9v this eexactly and as far as i go the baby is BETTY screw mee gain monster HAZ
@@user-ix9wx6ms9v It's exactly a marketing plan, with no concern for the child.
Hello Julie
How are you doing?
The baby was named after their “captor” (“the Royal family”) to whom they escaped.
Who would name their baby after their so called “captor” or “warden”?
They are so stupid they don’t see they allow themselves to be owned, like slaves to the RF by their constant focus and building their lives around the RF🤣🤣
Exactly.
They still thinking how to leach off the royal family.
@@kitbram2033If those 2 had a brain they would have stayed with the RF,,,, Lol….. Dumb and Dumber.
Excellent point
Harry’s wife is a mean girl. And remember Harry’s bus ride through LA where he used all those double meaning words to insult the Queen?
And he reminded us all he's a prince before getting on the bus, saying he had no cash for a ticket - us Royals don't. So much for walking away from the RF for a private life 🤣🤣🤣
Check urban dictionary for the meaning of the words Harry used.
I couldn’t agree with you more! As an American, I find it truly abhorrent to realize that another American could show such abject disregard for the Queen Elizabeth. Please don’t judge Americans by Meghan’s behavior. We deserve soooo much better, and so the British and the Royal Family.
Hear, hear! 🎯
MM is an embarrassment!
Thank you
Don't worry, we don't. We recognise narcissists when we see them. Just sorry that you've got lumbered with those pair of whiny woke hypocritical snowflakes who like to rename any criticism of their behaviour racism.
We dont
I don't judge but I am pissed off that they both continue to lie to the world omg this is sick mental problems both are sick I am 57 and these 2 brats create this harm it's bad
Using a precious,innocent child as a pawn in their game is the lowest of low.
Harry’s wife knows no boundaries!
Oh, don't worry! These two will come up with something even more disGUSTING ‼️
To a narcissist - a child is nothing but an extension of themselves. Like an arm or a leg.
@@kristend344 To a narcissist no one is anything but an extension of themselves, a child, a friend, a spouse, an institution. Everyone exists for the sole purpose of serving them. The Narcissist believes they are the star in the movie of their life and everyone else is there in that movie with them as accessory to help make the life they believe they deserve become reality.
Sadly, any child of a narcissist will be damaged beyond belief. Harry goes onto the screen and proclaims how damaged he was with his childhood, his children will be damaged as much or more then he. He should take those two children back to England, and the Queen could claim them.
@@brendakauffman2222 I had an immediate family member who was a covert narcissist. She's been dead for over 25 years, and the fall-out from her mind games continues. (I did not have a grave dance to the tune of "ding dong the wicked witch is dead". It was suggested.)
I hope there really aren't any kids - because Haz's wife will make their life h3ll if there are. And Haz and his "genetic pain" he blames on his father (and grandparents) . . . he ain't seen nothin' . . . .
To us, the normal, sensitive people, the moment we saw 'Lilibet' on the Queen's card we knew that she was retiring her special name forever, to rest with Philip.
Well said
Well said 😓😓😓
Beautifully put.
Nobody owns a name, the child will be called "Lilli" for short get a life
@Hawkwoman H I'm afraid you're right.
Thank goodness there are plenty of compassionate people who understand, to compensate for the many who lack the subtlety to know what this is really about.
They say they are going to call her "Lili" - yet you know they are going to trot out "Lilibet" at every single possible chance. Or even "Lilibet Diana" ...
Na...just Lil will catch on.
Ha ha ha ha
It would be great if millions of mothers to be name their babies Lilibet. That way it's not unique anymore. Google the name and thousands show up. Serves her right.
@@carolannevans7533 Yep me too. Lil named after her mother Lilo Lil.
If I were a british citizen I would lead a campaign to collectively and dismissively refer to the child as Lil Doria! That would bury the actual given name as well as infuriate the mother! Lol Don't take it seriously, just kidding.
I am a R.N. who worked labor and delivery for a very long while. I believe we will find out someday Megan was not pregnant nor did she give birth. She is far too vain to ever allow her body to carry and birth a child. I saw that fake bump bounce around all the time - even sideways at times. Often it was too low or too high and changed sizes depending on the day. My opinion is she really doesn't even want to be a mother. They travel all the time. Never seem to spend time with the children or let them be seen in public. I think the announcement of the children amounted to pure competition with HRH Prince William and HRH Princess Catherine. I don't know who the children belong to but I do not believe they
are Harry and Megan's. This is just my opinion based on my nursing experience and common sense.
I'm sure you never have time to read these comments but I love to watch you and I will always say you are 100% correct.
We do so hope it will all be exposed...soon please.. she was never pregnant..allegedly they don't even live together..the King should insist on DNA on both kids. If he can find them?you have to ask? Why the scam? Who else is behind it? Markle is evil.
It is an outrage. It’s possible MM’s sycophantic supporters don’t understand how disrespectful using the name is but that is no excuse for ignoring how badly the Queen has been treated by the couple. I’m no royalist but - aside from the lack of respect - for *anyone* to trash their grandmother for cash all over the world and then use her private, personal nickname for their child is vile. I wish I’d written the choice down beforehand, as it was inevitable, I’m afraid and tells you everything you need to know about the parents involved. Grotesque.
@Micro Soft Terribly sorry if that’s what came across; I meant that the supporters I have listened to have not understood the way the Queen is addressed, the respect given to what little privacy she has and how not even her relatives, aside from the absolute few, would ever dream of addressing HRH by her nickname. I will rephrase if allowed to edit, otherwise please accept my apologies. Edit: have made correction, I should never comment and talk to my kids at the same time! Best wishes.😊
Agreed- the choice of baby names turned my stomach when I saw the headline. Feeling so sorry for our Queen in her time of mourning. The choice of names for both babies seems totally manufactured and actually unloving. What the actual hell are H+ wife trying to make ? The mind boggles ...
HM
@@UntrainedAye Agree. Using the name, ‘Mountbatten,’ too is particularly strange and ill advised, why would you want to name your child with that of a known paedophile? I hope it’s for reasons of pomposity.
@Smith R. Absolutely. Exactly how the lies about titles were able to spread. The monarchy is a very odd, archaic organisation like the Anglican and Catholic Church and if one is outside of them, their customs and traditions can mystify and lend themselves to misinterpretation.
Dear Lady C. The one of the main things I have learned over my 73 years is that you “reap what you sow”. This couple does not want to find that we all grow old and will become insignificant in the future and will deal with adult children someday!
Amen!
The sooner the better.
Exactly right!
They will never call this child Lilibet. There was no need to ever call her that other than to shock and infuriate the family. This child will always be "Lili" and nothing more.
Just another jab in the Queen's back because they are unhinged and at this point, stalking the Queen.
Stalking the Queen........haha! Yep.
I live in hope.that there really is a plan being put into motion to deal with the wife.
How right u r Tanya! 👌👌👌
It's called paying homage to the queen
@@MoejiiOsmanTV and they could have done that with a simple "Lilly" without using Lilibet.
They purely wanted the shock value and marketing value of using a name that the entire family knew as reserved for the Queen.
For a couple that want privacy and to enjoy their freedom, they do everything they can to make sure they stay talked about by doing crap like this.
It wasnt a tribute at all. It was a planned jab at a 95 yr old who, let's be honest, will most likely never meet this child in person.
The nickname for the late Queen was a personal, family nickname for her. To take that name for their child hit me the wrong way. It feels, to me, as if they took something that didn't belong to them.
Massive boundary violation
It was a pathetic attempt to mend the relationship between them and the Queen by these two ingrates! That name was given to the Queen by her husband and only he and a few others were to call her that! Adding Diana as a middle name was deplorable! Neither the Queen or Diana would approve the use of these names! Charlotte has already been given the names! Harry stuck the knife in and Markle twisted it! It was a big "F*** You to the working Royals! Who will call this child but Harry and Meghan! Neither one has family or friends!
They took the name because they are vulgar. Can’t wait for comeuppance
The complete disregard for others' privacy while demanding privacy absolutely astounds me.
A mean and spiteful jab at Her Majesty for not getting her way.
MM was so upset about not being able to use the name "Royal "" so she decided to use and abuse the Queen's pet name which was only used by her eloved husband, father, grandad and sister... ☹... so disrespectful....
Yes, it’s narcissistic revenge. There will be more.
The message is also , that the Queen didn’t want them to use “ Royal “ so Meghan says ok then I’ll use your private name and I’ll trademark it .CHECKMATE !
I can’t stand that Trollope
She truly is a sociopath , she never met a rule she didn’t break ! Ugh
I am sure if they start to merch the name, even for so called non-profit, RF will object.
The BRF has a clear option. Deal with the evil two legally. And put a stop to them merching the BRF's names. Sue them BOTH for reserving the domain name. We the listeners would like to see the best lawyers handle this + shut them down.
@Lifesucks! Sodoesgoogle ....but I still think if you’re a woman in your nineties with an ill husband and extended family to consider, patronage’s to consider, and the welfare of a nation to consider....its kind of hard to go up against someone with no other considerations except themselves
@Lifesucks! Sodoesgoogle 100% right!! The Queen is softy and dignified. She didn't listen to the masses of the world to take the titles away from their importance them. It's too late in one way but not in another if only IF IF she steps down and hands the throne to William. Charles no I don't want him to be king because then the titles prince and princess will be given to them. William has no obligation to follow this "protocol" Now is the Queen going to listen to the masses???
@Lifesucks! Sodoesgoogle that’s true , but if she responded , MM would just amp it up ! She’s just daring them to bring it !
I read The Queen had said after Prince Philip passed that the name Lilibet wasn't to be used again. After months of bashing All the RF almost daily to use that name.
That is why they used it!
That is why they used it. A piece of work hey.
Well there you go, she is saying ....... I CAN !!
De-bunking Harry and Megan lies | The Me You Can’t See debunking | Harry and Megan truth ruclips.net/video/uSWS3fQVx8A/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/pEB_OnkEPas/видео.html
Cant you see Meghan at ten saying "I dare you to tell Me anything I cant do...I will show you I CAN!" She will.never grow up.
I’m feeling now, a year later, that the name for the baby was payback for not being able to use the word “Royal”.
So she took another name for another purpose, with the same impertinence.
It was pointed out to M that the word Royal didn’t belong to her so she took a more personal name because it was easy and seemingly up for grabs! No protocols around sensitivity.
She’s a monster.
She’s awful! Apparently, demanded Prince Harry announce he was dating Meghan, or else she’d break up with him! Then they were engaged, then married at the wedding, she called a “spectacle”, claiming they got “married” 3 days before! Plus, the twice divorced Meghan, wore “virginal” white wedding dress with vail, that upset the Queen, and wanted to wear a certain tiara that Queen said no, and told her she could wear a different one, which, afterwards Meghan wanted to keep (wow, no way that would happen!), and she bullied Princess Charlotte too! Only her mother was there and many celebrities she invited, who didn’t know her (publicity and contacts for later on; Oprah, Clooney’s)! Red flags 🚩 all over! She had agendas! It was a slap 👋 to the Royal Family what she’s done! She’s mentally disturbed and emotionally unstable with NPD and Histrionic disorder, etc.! Prince Harry is not well, too!
Your observation is gigantic, and I think you are so so spot on. Thank you for that. I do not believe these children exist. I don’t believe Megan was ever pregnant. She’s far too selfish for that, so who is the egg whose sperm who conceived, who carried who delivered to these children, DNA, DDA, DNA,DNA
I always thought the same.
You are so right that's exactly what she did she stole Lilibet off the casket totally for spite why didn't she use doria in any form of her child's name remember when she said never mind I don't want to stir her up because she believes Charles is weak
💯 agree
So the Queen dosen’t own the word „royal” and now she dosen’t own the right to privacy of her own nickname 🤷🏻♂️
You saved me from posting it.
MM is just horrible
Apparently since they registered the name ,the Queen no longer can even use that name without paying them for the privilege.
@@ericaj.m.1780 More like sheer evil.
Prince Philip used to call her cabbage why not call her that.
Naming the child Lilibet is not “honouring “ the Queen at all!
Agree100%....the name will get merched to death
Correct, they could have actually named her Lili and privately ( and keep it private) the let the queen know it was a nod to her. That would have been a nice thing to do.
@@roseharvey2664 yes, I think Lilibet I’d lovely.
It’s perfectly horrible, why would anyone want to add insult to injury like this. I cannot imagine what the Queen should be feeling by now.
I feel like need to hear someone voicing the truth about these two misguided idiots, however I think we give them too much power.
They’re running scared of the possibility of their titles being taken… this is their way of keeping the RF ‘connection’
With or without Harry at this point.
Its an invitation to "take me on " if you think you are strong enough .
Ageeeed
@@lesleyriseam1282 - yes MM is a nasty piece of work - despite the pearly white smile - she is vindictive to the core. The only way with people like that are to ignore them
@@LestWeForget-LestWeForget you got there first 😅🤣
Yes, calling her Lilibet is so very rude! I find myself looking away from the name in print even! Out of respect for the queen.
I read that Harry registered this name Lilibet so no one will be able to use it. Too bad HMTQ didn’t do this, but she couldn’t have imagined her grandson would do such a thing
Oh anyone can use the name. And will
Can the queen object through the court
I agree with Kathy Sharp that anyone can use the name, but only Needy and Greedy can profit from it.
I've read that they've made a domain on LilibetDiana.. They'd like to own the copyright on Lilibet but let's hope one of the Royals grabbed copyright and domain name first
I named my puppy Lilibeth in 2019. The name is Hebrew and has been around for ages. They don’t own it!
“Cold fury and consternation” is exactly how it feels. Stealing the Queen’s identity in my opinion! So narcissistic.
Could be getting her back for not lending her the tiara she wanted.
@@barbaratrust149 the Tiara is the Crowns property not up to Meghan to decide which hugely important intimate objects of jewellery made for the Queen of England not a twice married has been.
@@barbaratrust149 I think it's
so they don't lose their titles
@@jeffreyskinner7167 I agree.
God save the queen 👑
Lady c. There’s a surrogate mother situation going on !!! I was told the young girl isn’t wanting to give up the babe ...my friend is a nurse at Santana Barbara cottage hospital she said mm never came there to give birth....
Very interesting 🤨
Keep us posted!
Thats what i wanted to hear!!!!!!!!
Yes keep us posted!
I hope the surrogate keeps her baby. She'll be better off.
I adore Lady C for her honesty, her eloquence, and her passion for the truth. If I could choose just one person on the planet to spend an afternoon with, sipping tea whilst conversing openly, sharing ideas and views - it would be Lady C. No doubt about it.
You can take my place, with the man known as 'Lady CC'
Me too. I could listen to her all day long. She is truly genuine - in herself and in what she says. 👍😘
@@jenniferpratt8883 the terrible 'slow speak' sends me to sleep, as does he
Enjoy River for the same reason. Love listening to the etiquette and elegance.
I agree that both children have surrogate mothers, and I hope that it all comes ot soon, as MM is quite the piece of work.
Keep an eye on these children, because they may not be in agood situation.
I pray that this mystery will be revealed.
Yes naming the baby Lillibet is the ultimate insult. WHY ARE MH TRYING TO DESTROY AN ELDERLY WOMAN LIKE THIS. It is so sick!!!
Think leverage. Think money.
Because they didn't get what they wanted. They therefore set out to destroy everything the other Royals have. It is jealousy..green eyed monstrous & growing by the day.
They want the Queen to die just as they accelerated the death of the Duke of Edinburg so that they will get Harry’s inheritance.👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽
@@giftyotchere1274 I think you are so right. I also think that if they can help the queen along, it will be easier for them to take down the monarchy. Long live The Queen 🇬🇧
@@freedomfighter5957 My thoughts exactly. They want the collapse of London Bridge.
“You don’t own the word Royal, you don’t own the word service and guess what, I now own the words
Lilibet Diana”. What a piece of work. That poor, poor baby.
EXACTLY!! I had the same thought!
Plus, I think they stole little George's safe name, Archie and gave it to their son.
@@mlmallory2780 also the name Archie was taken from the Spanish kings dog. Now I'm wondering if that king visited yachts at any stage?
They've used princess Charlotte second names Elizabeth diana lili never be called lilibet there's only one lilibet
@@janesansome2506 they called Lili ..like water Lily flower
I wish the Queen would stop this comedy by legally starting to protect the Royal Family from any form of trolling and bully behaviour. Harry’s wife running a silent war which is not only blatantly vulgar but noticed by all of us. Time has come in my opinion when the Queen needs to put these two to their place.
I cud not agree with you more! It’s time for ACTION! 💪💪💪👏👏👏👏👊👊👊👊👊👊
@Lisa Perkett too nice full stop
Take the titles. I mean to say, calling that ridiculous American 2nd-rate actress 'Duchess' is laughable. She was a total failure in her role as a duchess, excruciatingly embarrassing. There was nothing anyone could do to help. She was just too stupid.
@Lisa Perkett Now is Charle's and William's chance to really take the crown by the jewels, if you know what I mean, and really tell these two traitors how it's going to be. They should actually threaten legal action against them and threaten to jail them both for treasonous and treacherous behaviour. They have conned, lied, deceived, manipulated and BS their backsides off since the 18th May, 2018!!! The minute they were married everybody started seeing the FAKENESS of these two muppets.
I wish it was possible to disinherit Harry and his children from the line of succession.
I agree, at the time my first thought that calling the child Lilibet was extremely impertinent! ANYBODY that has an inkling of good etiquette knows not to intrude and insult anybody by calling the child anyone's pet name let alone the Queen's pet name. Terribly rude! That name was a loving personal term from the Queen's father to his daughter, and that woman should not have high -jacked it for her child.
Don't believe its official... someone combed CA state birth records and for that day believe only Elizabeth Diana (forget what the order was) showed up in birth records.
They could have named the invisible child Elizabeth...that would have been much better received
@@VikingFrog Believe that's whats in the CA birth records... like Diana Marie Elizabeth M-W shows up, no one has found Lilibet name used officially. But certainly run with it in public and registered any, many domain name variants of Lilibet after she was born.
"Elizabeth" would have been respectful. Stealing "Lilibet" is treacherous.
Given Harry's views of his grandmother recently the name Elizabeth would have been offensive as well.
Nobody owns a name u seem dillusional n off ur meds
Lilibutt
Lilibutt
Ten Gallon Hat totally agree with you 💯 💯 👍 MEGHAN MARCLE IS DISCUSTING AND DISRESPECTFUL TO OUR QUEEN. USEING LILIBET
Honesty is important if one wishes to be likeable and respected. No one would care if the couple used surrogates for their children, but we hate being manipulated by lies and fake moonbumps. If they really do not care about titles, then why not be honest about their births? A surrogate birth won't matter if titles don't matter....but, as we know, titles actually do matter to Meghan.
You took the words right out of my mouth. This is EXACTLY what I also think.
What makes you think MM gives a toss about the truth? As long as they can manipulate the PR & merch....🤮🤮🤮
She plays games, constantly. It's disrespectful. Unroyal. She's teaching him what to do too.
In this day and age of leaks and easily decimating information, seems to me that someone, somewhere would have leaked details and knowledge about a surrogate being used, in The UK and the US. That kind of secret and potential media bombshell would be impossible to keep under wraps. Also, think about the potential vulnerabilities like blackmail that carrying out two fake pregnancies would risk? For this reason, I don’t believe a surrogate was used.
De-bunking Harry and Megan lies | The Me You Can’t See debunking | Harry and Megan truth ruclips.net/video/uSWS3fQVx8A/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/pEB_OnkEPas/видео.html
I think it's despicable that Harry's wife thrives by kicking dirt in people's faces. A true sadist, I think!
Yes, she´s a nasty sadist.
I truly feel sorry for both of those children.
There’s no biological children!
1/24/23...They DON'T have kids of their own supposedly.
The children are Harry
@@eileeneclark9011 so whose children are they? Harry has no children
They will turn out as rude as them.
There's no money to be made from Doria's name.
^^^THIS^^^
BOOM!
Yes, the money would have been made using Doria Diana or Diana Doria. The current market noise would be loud! Using Lilibeth was a way of giving the Queen the finger. By next week, the name will no longer be unique. There will be thousands of Lilibeth Dianas born in this world.
Wow! Ick
My immediate reaction, after shock, was disgust, that woman respects no-one and she'll throw shade over anyone. I knew from day one that she has no regard for anyone but herself. This baby, like the first, is nothing but another product for her to market. Why else register the name to copyright them? Sad to say I also think her mother, Doria, was only ever the "token black" for Meghan to make herself look good and compassionate and woke.
The fact that they created a new domain is proof that they'll be making money from her name with is beyond scary and shows that their plan was NOT a nod to the Queen!!!
Archie , first born son, no nod to Royalty in his name_ this couple are deplorable
0
Something truly off with that woman. She's flat our scary looking at times, that demonic grin she has creeps me out.
So well said !!!
I am adamant it’s like poring salt into a wound that hasn’t healed, and is still hurting. Most expectant mothers register at a Baby Store, not registering domain names. I was busy counting fingers and toes, not calculating how much money my baby was going to bring in. They are rotten to the core
Isn't it marvellous what you can order on line these days, even pick up at your convenience at your local Click 'n' Collect point.
Couldn't agree w/ you more!
I have a very cold feeling that "little boy Archie", is going to fade away.
The alleged mother bought a bracelet or a watch, quite some time ago specifically for her future daughter.
It was also engraved.
They are, absolutely, rotten to the core.
Lady Campbell, even if the birth of Lillibet is surrogate or what, is Meghan Markle the first? Why hating the lady with much hate? There are so many things you should focus your attention to than Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. How much did they pay you? Are you a witch? Stop witch hunting this couple. You are never perfect. Enough of your running them down.
Its all about the money.. It wasn’t appropriate to decide on the name without the Queen’s permission. It’s just sickening the damage they are doing to Royalty. I feel very sorry for their children. They have isolated them from a family and that’s very sad 😢
Apparently Prince Harry did ask the Queen for permission to name their daughter after her, and she said it was OK, thinking it’d be Elisabeth, not “Lilibet” (her private, personal name)! Royal children are usually named after ancestors, not abbreviated names or nicknames!
Agree! Poor children &now they grow without family!
The children don't have a hope in hell of growing up to be normal adults!
They (MeAgain) copyrighted the name Lilibeth Diana BEFORE the child was born...
My heart goes out to the royal family - there is no end to the odiousness of this woman that they are saddled with. And I do feel sorry for the innocent children.
The RF need to do something about these two. "Doing nothing" reminds me of when Diana died and the backlash they received from the press and the public.
Ur both Muppets
Do you really believe Archie, and now their new "daughter" actually live with them? IMO they are both on loan for photo ops and nothing more. Those two are so self centered they couldn't possibly make room for children in their lives.
Odious creatures! Using their child as a tool to insult their family. Harry seems to have already failed to project poor Lilibet from his “genetic pain.”
Nina Alexandria*
@Us Us? 0
this is intentional and more than impertinent - using the pet name the Queen's father and husband had for her is a big FU to the Queen! what a horrible person H's wife is - bullying a 94-year-old woman weeks after her husband died.
95 yrs old had a birthday recently LLTQ
And Harry aiding and abetting her
If she was not really pregnant why did she ruin Eugene 's big day by announcing she
was pregnant .Shame on you Megbeth and Hazzard for taking away spotlight from the bride
Because if you notice, she tries to overshadow everything the RF do? Look at all the announcements it does just as one of the family does something. Markle should be tucked away in an institution somewhere with high fences all around..
“trusted care” of the hospital staff, meaning they all signed NDA’s (shut up or we’ll sue)
There are HIPAA laws as well.
Yes! It doesn’t mean obstetric care, that doesn’t have to be mentioned. They all had a secret that the Sussex’s relied upon.
No it's not! It's casting shade pn the British hospitals.
Quite!
@@mandy.austin I hadn't thought of that.
This is definitely not an olive branch. Reconciliation demands that amends be made. A public apology for their egregious misbehavior would constitute an acceptable FIRST step toward making amends.
TOO LATE.
Hello Patti
How are you doing?
PS. I feel sorry for the innocent baby who will end up being a victim and need real therapy after Markle gets with her!!
S
@@GCMC-m2h Lil bit unlucky to get a narcissistic mother. Hope she's resilient.
Don't worry nothing will happen to rent a child it stays with it's mother until needed in between where is a realistic baby doll for money or title
You can buy anything and no
One is the wiser
@@GCMC-m2h watch for mysterious illnesses to pop up. I am certain this child will be a victim of Munchausens by Proxy, therein rendering Meghan a victim/martyr/hero. Anything for attention. You read it here first!
Wonder if they used their own genetic source or had to get a donor for fertilization. That is the true reason for having surrogacy if there is an infertility issue or problems with implantation or maintaining the pregnancy to full term. Not for vanity reasons as is the current trend amongst celebrity women. Is the surrogate the wet nurse too.If the egg was donated then their would be no issue with color of the children and she could thumb her nose at the Royals.
Two years later, Lady C got everything absolutely spot on. This pair in this sad folie a deux has reached unfathomable levels of ridicule.
Oh, I predict it will go lower.
@@happycat3399 Totally agree with you.
I can’t believe she didn’t use her family names for either of the children. Come on Harry wake the F up!
Isnt it funny thou....that she did not...BUT she is the one screaming royals are racist....lol
Perhaps Archie should be given the nickname grandson of Thomas, and Lil to be called niece of Samantha. I don't think Mommy Dearest would like that.
Doria?? Raggie? Samantha?
@@hilaryjohns4049 Brilliant!
There's NO money in it! Remember she discards people even family when they don't serve any purpose for her any longer!
They licensed the name Lilibet the moment the poor child
Was delivered to them. So roll out Lilibet clothes,books, to name
a few ! This is just disgusting and the final betrayal
3 days before!
coming to a WalMart near you Lilibet dolls, nappies, burp cloths, etc, etc, etc. Truly sad. 6 and wife have hit a new low.
Oh Wolf. Great point. Never thought of that.
Soon trailer parks around USA will be filled with Lilibeths. Dear God.
It's all about their financial gain. Even their children are just props for money making opportunities.
It just angers me that Harry and his wife have disrespected his sovereign and his grandfather like this. The Queen has few enough areas of her life that are private. For something so close to her heart to be used like this so blatantly.
This is her modus operandi...there is no RESPECT for anything or anybody....except $$$$
Exactly!! For people who value privacy, how could they violate one of the Queen’s only intimate, private parts of her personal identity.
De-bunking Harry and Megan lies | The Me You Can’t See debunking | Harry and Megan truth ruclips.net/video/uSWS3fQVx8A/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/pEB_OnkEPas/видео.html
They disrespect EVERYONE
I was HORRIFIED when I heard the name, my stomach turned. It shows how deeply and willfully ignorant Meghan is of English culture and our respect for Her Majesty, our tradition, and any sort of decorum (even if one isn't Royalist). She may have thought it was a subtle 'two fingers up', but I don't think she fully understood how many people (with basic common decency. let alone respect for an Ancient Monarchy), would have been appalled by such a crass spectacle. The sad thing is, I thought Harry was a bit easily led but not willfully disrespectful to his family, but after THIS... he would have fully understood the unforgivable transgression... Meghan really has him under her thumb, but she truly has no comprehnsion of the family she's dealing with. She may be smart but she's no Diana... Diana knew the nuances of the game she was playing.
Taking the piss out of the Queen.
Since her kids have no titles, she lost her position.....she digs in even further...using the Queens and Diana’s name to perpetuate her own status and continuity through her kids. She has calculatingly engraved it into everyone’s minds.
Lest no one forget....
Agreed!!!👏👏👏👏👏👏
You are absolutely correct
When Charles becomes king all his grandchildren who don't alrdy have titles will become prince n princess aka Archie n Lilly u Muppets learn ur history
Meghan Markle must be erased permanently from the Royal history books.. a woman who sneakily conned and faked her way into the world's most famous family... hellbent on trying to destroy them... time to get rid of them once and for all!!
Poor Lili, she is used as an huge middle finger to the Queen. What an awefull start! I wish her strength and luck and a very kind, gentle, caring and protective Nanny!!
and within hours of the birth, they registered the name lilibet as a domain name.........
@@clairelouise4063 I think any loving nanny will be sacked, just listen to Lady C's description of how her narc mother got rid of nannies that she and her siblings loved.
Lady C speaks the most beautiful and correct English I've ever heard!
And, not only does Lady C speak lovely, correct English, she knows whereof
she speaks!
3
I think it’s an utter disgrace they called the child that name, I’m still fuming!!
Tasteless and tactless.
@Terrie Jervey it is an opportunity to leave the door cracked for H’s great Escape!
@@jackiehamilton2738 verschlagen und berechnend!
@@lillysemineth1428 Danke!
Me too .... im cross
I'm still having a difficult time believing that MM was ever pregnant. I'm also having a difficult time believing that they have any children. When they do release a photo of their "children" facial features and hair color changes, this is not possible with out surgery due the the radical changes to the facial features Archie displays. It has also been proven that Lilibet's birthday photo was someone else's child. No birth certificate has been proven for Lilibet, the hospital they named has no record of her ever being there. The hospital staff has stated that they have no record of any babies being born on the day in question. It has also been proven that the children have never been to Great Britain due to the flight manifest being released. Only H & M were on the manifest. Please help explain this
Same here. I saw the video on you tube of the moonbump around her knees. No wonder she didn't want the Royal doctors involved in the pregnancy or the birth. I don't know about Lillibet but it wouldn't surprise me if they are lying about that as well.
But why did Meghen show up with babybump when actually didn't give birth? A "miracls". Hmmm
.
Such blatant disrespect for HM the Queen. How dare they?
M is a vulgar little gutter snipe, and H is an appallingly weak man.
Wow, I call women of that nature a gutter snipe too, thank you for bringing that really traditional label back. Young people wouldn't get it at all, but older people understand the label.
The words "trusted care' are thrown into the announcement as a threat to the staff to keep their mouths shut about anything - no talking in the hallways , right M
Nailed it Evelyn!
Good point
The words "trusted care" are so extra.
They licensed the name lilibetdiana the same day as they released the statement of her birth. Poor kid will be little more than a marketing tool.
No licenced name on Friday day she was born.
I would think that one would be so "in love, so beholden " by the birth of their sweet little baby girl that nothing else would be on their mind. Harry and his wife thinks of licensing the baby name, thought it was appropriate to steal a term of endearment from their husbands, mourning grandmother, who just happens to be the Queen of England, who made it clear after her beloved husband died, that her pet name was no longer to be used!
My understanding is that the domain name lilibetdiana.com was a licensed domain via GoDaddy three days prior to the birth in both the US and the UK.
I don’t think you can claim a name as a worldwide trade mark .
Hello Jane
How are you doing?
Lady C you are the ULTIMATE truth speaker and I applaud you 💯💯💯 I love your updates and agree with everything that you say. Thank you so much xxx
Aren't they a revolting couple of people. One couldn't imagine the length she will go to. He is such a tool. The poor Queen
The poor Queen will always love her Grandson, this constant bad mouthing of her Grandson does no favors.
@@paulk8195 this ungracious grandson is not only badmouthing our beloved Queen but also our monarchy and our nation to the world, while whining that he isn't being paid by us for doing so.
@@ab-hs3ou Hapless' wife now has everything she ever wanted. Hapless has lost everything he ever had.
The Duke and Duchess of Surrogate.
@@paulk8195 ààqqq
What's going to happen now is every second girl born in America and through out the world will be called lilibet now, making it no longer unique but just cheapening the name that was so special to our Queen!
God, I'm an American and I hope not. It is the Queen's name. for God sakes.
@@gaga2912 Only for business purposes. It is not off limits for use as a personal name.
@@swampfoxtaylor5728 Agreed!
@@gaga2912 I think that just means it can’t be used commercially
So painful to think about :'(
They have disgraced themselves. No this child will carry the sins of her mother and father. They have put a stigma on this child.
Wait until she goes to school. Children can be cruel
NARC mothers are Hell.
I know😪💔
@@carolynsimpson412 U hv great foresight. Think she’ll be laughed at & made fun of with such long name. In America they don’t give a hoot to pomposity. Poor child 🧒
@@carolynsimpson412 not sure about that. If they stay in LA, she will go to school with kids named "North West" and names like that, so who knows 🤷♀️
I do fear the sins of the fathers and mothers will be laid upon this poor dear child. I can only hope that she partakes of the strength of Prince Philip's lineage as his daughter Princess Anne and be able to call a spade a spade and not be troubled by Trifles or trifling people .
Pray to the Lord🙏
You are so spot on. Don't ever stop giving us your thoughts.
I blame Judge Warbly for the despicable behavior of the Harkles. When Warbly issued Summary of Judgement in Rachel’s favor, Warbly basically gave the Harkles the green light too do as they please in spades.
Bet he was paid off
Yes the Judge has certainly lessened my once pride in British Justice. He has gone the way of the woke. Only know and speak “their truth” not the actual truth.
@@Dj69bly looks like it
De-bunking Harry and Megan lies | The Me You Can’t See debunking | Harry and Megan truth ruclips.net/video/uSWS3fQVx8A/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/pEB_OnkEPas/видео.html
All lies aside, she's a formidable merchant, with a brilliant talent to make money.
C'mon, she will never run out of coin.
😎😈
I can hear Harry's wife saying the Queen can't copyright this name the same as the word royal. Just a horrid woman
She is a vile wretched wicked woman.
Dear Lady C, since the Queen has legal rights custody over her grand and great-grand children, does she possess any legal rights to the official names of them? In other words, could she have the legal name changed of the latest great-grand baby? Thank you for giving voice to the upset and frustration of millions around the world.
Doesn't matter what she has the queen has made it clear she is unwilling to fight back
Only over the grandchildren, not the great-grans. And this 18th c. legal prerogative would have to go through Parliament and would not stand up in a court of law.
Mariat 108 I was sure I heard this in the news about the Queen having custody of the grands and greats and when megain signed legal papers, she knew this. So Lady C, how are they getting around this? If H dies, what happens to the children?
The Children’s Act was enacted in 1989...there’s no royal exemption within the act....so I think Harry and Megan retain custody. It may really depend on how close they are in the line of succession. It would be really interesting to understand the legalities
Very good question, I would love the answer to. And also if they become American citizens do they loose their line in the UK succession?
I have 2 adopted children, they are so wonderful I cannot express how much love and happiness they have given to us!!
If Phillip was still alive I am not sure they would have done it. He would have been disgusted and he would have said something.
But they allowed the Oprah interview to be released while Prince Philip was on his deathbed?
@@cch9680 that is true, they don't really seem bound by normal decency. So maybe they would have done this anyway and upset Philip too. All so unnecessary, if only there wasn't such a shortage of names available in the world.
@@roseharvey2664 Unfortunately, there is no low too low for a narcissist.
just when you think the harkles couldn t sink any lower they manage to do it
They can! They can!
@@pollycelino1548 and will continue to do so continuously.
Theres no money in calling the baby Doria
But after Diana and Doria shorten it to Diaria. Perhaps an insult to Diana’s memory but I am sure she would chuckle at that one!!
Narcs always do
I am curious to know what Princess Anne said about this.
Good riddance 😂🤣😅
How many 4 letter words do you know?
me too!
Probably unprintable.
@@xxyes8879 And then some!!
Lady C you are so articulate at describing The Meghan and Harry Show! I love listening to you!
Stealing the Queen's nickname is revolting. Pound another nail in the coffin of Harry's relationship with his family. Poor Queen Elizabeth, having to put up with this trash. Charles and William must be furious and who can blame them?
As I’ve said since day one. Let’s watch her, she’s TRASH entertainment. All she does is trash the BRF day to day. She will never stop.
Yes & if they think the press has been negative up to NOW, if HM the Queen passes sooner rather than in a year or two (long live The Queen 💞) THEN The Queen's untimely passing WILL BE attributed to this foul & vile disrespect that h & mm have shown to Her Majesty 💞😪
I saw a comment on a other video drawing attention to when Megan said that the Queen does not own the word 'royal' and now she is taking the Queen's name away from her as well.
Well said.
They previously stole Prince George's nickname Archie too! Dispicaple pair
"The Queen doesnt own word Royal, neither does Lilibet".. I can "hear" them saying it in their twisted minds.
Agree wholeheartedly! It is their way to get back at the Queen! There is only 1 Lilibet and that is the Queen of England 🇬🇧
Had exactly the same thought, a spiteful way to get back as they did with that statement re the word ‘royal’. They are transparent, but think the rest of us are stupid. We can all see what they’re up to.
It made me feel sick too and still does. It's as if they have stolen the most precious and personal thing between her and Philip. It does not belong to the Queen anymore, it is now a cheap commodity. It must have been like a stab through the heart for the Queen. What a great way to injure the Queen, yes H's wife is evil incarnate.
Its heartbreaking that they've taken such a special name from the Queen, I didnt realised that they've merched it, I read that she's invited Harry to lunch & also they've been invited to the Jubilee..... it would ruin all the Events planned, all the Booing & rotten eggs & tomatoes that will be aimed at this Cruel couple
It is Elder Abuse Of The Queen; The Queen is 95 years old; When you steal something of monetary value from a elderly person; it is abuse; When they registered this name as a trade name it became a crime; In taking something of value from a Elderly person they value; You are stealing; Causing Mental distress is elder abuse; This woman even if she is The Queen still has feelings; She has just buried her beloved husband only few weeks ago' Has Harry even once thought about the Mental Health of his Elderly 95 year old Grand-Mother. Even Though She Is The Queen of England her heart has to be still breaking from lost of her Husband.
I'm convinced these two are trying to bump her off !
They just want the Queen to die so they can claim inheritance. All these 2 think about is Money and they will kill for Money!!!
I think the Queen sits up there in heaven, dishing out the karma right now...keep it coming!
Maybe somebody can release a press statement to Harry and his wife asking when their private life will commence?
Now that she has trademark the name, she owns the queens name. This quite literally is the biggest FU. It’s just so sick and demented to use a child and innocent this woman is vile.
HM's life is well documented in photographs, films, videos, letters, and other documents. Should the queen decide to file a copyright claim, she could well have a claim to "Lilibet."
@@booperpotpie9634 The last time I saw Lilibet was hand written by the Queen on the personal wreath, for her beloved husband on the day of his funeral. You couldn’t make this saga up!
@@booperpotpie9634 YES YES PLEASE DO . LETS ask Lady C & if she says NO, find someone willing and able to fight this. WE too as the Queen have been violated- tho to a lesser degree-- but violated all the same and WE CAN fight back without a loss of dignity. Actually, we gain back our and the Queen's integrity and dignity.
As they say-- NO ONE CAN TAKE YOUR
SELF-RESPECT unless u give it to them. PLEASE see what you can do. I'm NOT tech savy or on social medis so PLEASE reach out and put your excellent idea in motion. Give it legs!!😊
@@booperpotpie9634 I hope you are right.
I remember when they said that anyone can use the word ROYAL Sickening
On a serious note. Is there nothing the Queen can do about this? After all it is a breach of the Queen's privacy.
well the queens letting them off with it so its her own fault time to get rid of the monarchy altoghter why should we bother if theyre not.
I just think it’s shocking how detached they are from reacting. A true class that our culture doesn’t really enforce. As much as I want the Queen to do something, I also applaud her for carrying on; Meghan wants a reaction.
@@christinacatalano There's a big difference between reacting and responding. People are frustrated by the responses, both content and lack thereof, from the Queen and RF.
@@mariat108 yeah, that’s fair
If these children are not of royal blood then they have to be taken off the royal website.
The charade of this pair will blow up in their faces very soon. Just wait.
I cannot wait.
I certainly hope so!
✅
I can’t wait for the divorce.
I noticed that in the Cambridge's message of congratulations, they referred to the baby as just "Lili". Of all the headlines and messages I read on that day, this was perhaps the only one that made no mention of the baby's given name, "Lilibet". I believe this was William's polite but loaded way of expressing his views on the matter.
They also referred to them as Harry, Meagan, and Archie.
Judy & Penny, very astute. Thank you😊
Good spot.
Lady C, thanks for the update you have given to us. There is
so true to the story of what you said. I agree totally.🌹🌹🌹
Prob e
Harry’s wife seems to take great pleasure in hurting other people. In this case the Queen.
If we were in the 1500's and this was occurring MM would have lost her head!!! Off with her head the town folk cry!!!
She's a narcissist, hurting people is what they do best. They even hurt their own children.
She shows her true colors she's so vile it's not funny
What a relief to hear from a lady who is capable of
speaking English properly. Quite correct, of course: children are born, if the issue of the mother's body, "to" and not "for".