So, at what speed is the picture from 2:52? 10x? 100x? Would you say its a bit lying to speak about a record breaking printer, then show it printing 10 or 100x speed? As if THATS the speed it can print at?
offPlanet Gene therapy also used to be Sci-Fi. Now it's reality. 3D printing is gonna be the future. Just like GMO crops and genetically enhanced humans. It's inevitable
@@MisterK9739 Maybe, but this ain't it. Also, 3D printing needs a miracle or two to be remotely competitive for large scale production of anything. For example, I love kickstarters boasting about their plastic parts being 3D printed - the actual most expensive method to produce anything from plastic that you need more than a handful of.
They don't need to. Metal additive manufacturing is only used for parts that are too difficult to machine on a 5 axis machine. Grain orientation is one of the most important thing in applications, which is very difficult to achieve with additive manufacturing, but easily achieved by forging followed by machining. It'a a balance, no component is 100% printed, only the parts that make sense to printed get printed.
Yes, two companies in the past proposed the same idea, and I recall reading both were trying to patent the idea with some dispute! Videos of their demos which are faster than this are below. The problem is, I found a hobbiest in forum earlier than that suggesting the same idea, which makes me wonder if all those ideas are being "derived" from that hobbiest, and the authors with the reviewers of this work just failed to highlight or cite such previous work!! Here is a video from 2015 of the NEXA3D using the same liquid barrier idea: ruclips.net/video/Jq93d4R8gLA/видео.html .. and video from 2016 from NewPro3D with similar claim: ruclips.net/video/uqYEOyBmyLM/видео.html ... The idea in this recent work of using mobile liquid compared to static liquid is unique and interesting but still thorough review and giving credit to previous work is fundamental in science. Some Likes please so this could be seen to give credit to previous work!
The Real KING the Lathe just told all 3D Printers to eat your Heart out... Until they internalise the barb & come up with a HARP With Plasitc & METAL Sintering Heads! Thus it can Print T3's like Ice Cubes in a few hrs....Dooms Day from a Taunt!
3D printing metal is very very very expensive. We have printers that can do it but no one wants to use it because of the cost and the number of metal 3D printers
the showcased printer is a novelty. the shit it prints is so weak i doubt it could stand up to the weight of a single banana. resin prints are horribly weak. horribly light sensitive. and extremely toxic in liquid state. it's horrible technology. and metal 3d printing is NOT fas at all. the regular fdm metal printers (resembles a mig welding head on a 3d printer) are not fast at all. just as fast as any fdm printer. the powder deposit printer are a little faster but they loose their speed because the prints need to go into a kiln for several hours.
A step in the right direction, but that's still not very fast for many important applications, such as manufacturing, building materials, product customization, etc. Fortunately, a couple approaches are soon to bring 40-200 fold increases to that 7mm/min (1 foot to 5 feet per minute, depending on scale).
Yes that's very exciting....what they don't mention is specialty engineeered resins can cost 1,000s of dollars per litre.. Our chemical supplier suddenly discontinued a resin we use quite frequently, and the supposed 'replacement' was 4,700 dollars A PINT! (It wasn't a replacement, it was horrible for our application but let us survive for the nearly a year long process to find a suitable replacement)
I'm in the aerospace , and I've been into 3d printing since 2016 and noticed that high production was always the hurdle in 3DP , but I knew it was only a matter of time b4 the speed in printing would speed up. The future looks very good the limitless possibilities are endless and aerospace and space industries will produce a new generation of aerial vehicles that's a game changer. I'm going to purchase the Phenom by peopoly. Happy 3D printing 😁
3D printers have been around for over 30 years. But, a few cooperations kept them from the public until the patents ran out so that the people couldn’t just 3D print products for themselves.
I hope 3D printing keeps getting better. Right now the only real use for 3D printing is custom toys. You want to hold your OC Sonic character? You got it. You want a weird geometric vase? Cool. You want literally anything else? Injection molding is probably better
waiting for 3D printer to be a-must-have for all people to print everything within their garage,like cars or all other similar things..no Storage&making fee and anything else..just buying the models and you are good to go to have everything built right in your house with much lesser cost/price.
I'd be interested in knowing what the margin for error is in this process. Is there any testing being done on the finished product for structural integrity? I can see this being utilized for a key component in some kind of machine. Then possibly failing. In turn making the case for more strict regulations on testing the parts for flaws. Unless of course the mere way it's produced leaves almost zero room for flaws.
its just crazy to me how fast tech is growing within the recent years. If you think about how "primitiv" PCs for an example were in the 80-90 and what we are able to do now..... thats just crazy
SquiDragon yeah but the size isn’t the only thing that makes this very appealing. I am fine if it was only 20 * 15cm. It is the speed that makes it amazing. The Carbon M2 is very similar but is still >>>$10k
This is amazing. They didn’t explain it in the video for those who don’t know about 3D printing. For a home fda printer, the most common ones, printing a life size human head would take anywhere between 3-5 days depending on print settings. If you were to print something at the resolution of the printer in the video on a typical sla printer it would be at least a week if not more. So to print a full size human in hours is truly revolutionary. Sla printers have gone from $20,000 to $1,000 in the span of 5 years, so even if this printer has a high price now it will go down very quickly.
Too bad pretty much all materials for these printers are completely useless. Come on, don't act as though these things will ever replace injection molding or even supplement production with otherwise tricky to produce parts.
SEEKER: QUESTION ON SPACE ??? I just finishing watching the last episode of Lost In Space on Netflix (season 2); when they finally get to their destination planet, they find it almost broken in half and in pieces. My questions are: 1. Could you fly from the surface to those broken pieces of planet by commercial air flight or only by space ship if they were close enough together? 2. Are those pieces of planet habitable? Or could they become habitable again? 3. Could you venture into the spaces between the broken halves of the planet? 4. Would those pieces stay in place (like our planet and moon do) or eventually collide into each other with the force of gravity? Is the force of gravity effected? 5. What would life after a blow to a planet like that actually look like?
I think SLS printing should have been mentioned in this video. Complicated metal parts for aerospace are becoming standard fair. From rocket nozzles to fuel injectors for turbines there are tons of highly complicated SLS parts being used in industrial settings around the world. IMO, 3D printing is very good for low batch size fabrication, prototyping and eliminating the need for machining in metal parts. I doubt large batch injection molding will be surpassed by any form of 3D printing in the next 50 years, but I'll gladly eat crow if I'm wrong. Good video!
What is new is the layer of non-stick fluid that sits below the resin. Normally a SLA printer has to constantly lift and lower the build plate to break the print off the bottom membrane so a new layer can be formed. In this case, the print never sticks to the membrane, so a continuous print can be generated without the extra steps.
SLA exist since 80s. Infact it's first 3D printing technology to ever exist. These days you can by resin based 3D printer for under 300$ Although instead of laser they use a LCD with UV light behind it. Which is still very good (better than FDM quality atleast) You can check out Maker's Muse review of Anycubic Photon or Elegoo Mars (one I prefer).
Now they just need multiple light emitters along a conveyor trough of continually replenished resin that they can run the production head along, so that it starts at one end clean, and comes out the other fully printed. That way they have one long, continuous printing line.
Somebody should make a RUclips plugin that puts up an image of a frog every time somebody's voice dips low enough to vocal fry. Or maybe an image of somebody scratching a chalkboard.
What about the set up of your party.. overhangs the time input for those.. this is your easy part. Show us and wow us with the ability to generate automatic overhang generators and this ability to print fast. Using all types of resin. Or even colored parts.
Printing big is one thing, printing accurately is another. All 3D printing I've seen is relatively crude and requires a lot of manual finishing work to achieve quality approaching what you can form with "conventional" plastic moulding (which is often quicker too). That goes for low end consumer printing and expensive industrial printers. The featured one in this video looks like they sacrificed quality for size and speed.
Almost 3 years ago I had the same idea of using liquid interface to reduce adhesion in SLA/DLP and speed the process up. I digged deep to see if someone has done, and found two companies both have the same idea, and I recall reading both were trying to patent the idea with some dispute! Videos of their demos which are faster than this are below. The problem is, I found a hobbiest in forum earlier than that suggesting the same idea, which makes me wonder if all those ideas are being "derived" from that hobbiest, and the authors with the reviewers of this work and other just failed to highlight or cite such previous work!! Video from 2015 of the NEXA3D using the same concept: ruclips.net/video/Jq93d4R8gLA/видео.html .. and video from 2016 from NewPro3D with similar claim: ruclips.net/video/uqYEOyBmyLM/видео.html ... The idea in this recent work of using mobile liquid compared to static liquid is unique and interesting but still thorough review and giving credit to previous work is fundamental in science. Some Likes please so this could be seen to give credit to previous work!
I think what I've discovered is that as society and access to information progresses, we should expect to see more and more of these types of coincident ideas taking place. It happens much more often than one would intuitively expect.
Whenever watching videos about development in 3D printing technology, I always remember the use case where an austronaut can get different tools printed remotely by instructions from earth. I don't see this printer working in space however, because the liquid will not stay put.
It could stay put due to viscosity and surface spread, if it was injected around the base from a series of large syringes, and hydrophilic surface extended it into the intersecting lasers, but hydrophobic surface on the base and surrounding walls stopped the surface layer from sliding too high up the walls.
@@KusholaCam My point is they just made something that looks flashy and visually, aesthetically pleasing. They did NOT actually know holographic resin printers would become a reality and look kinda like that. It doesn't mean anything.
Well that is essentially the end practical goal really. If you want the machine to be further long-lasting in an isolated environment where parts might be scarce.
Thing is, this abomination can't print metal. It really cant even print useful plastics. These things look all sci fi and techy, but in the end they're completely useless due to the material properties of the prints.
People are going to have to learn to cope with few jobs left for us to do. Bring out our poets and artists and bring on education as our first objective.
This won't steal any jobs mate. This slow monstrosity of semi-informed hype is outclassed by decade-old large scale manufacturing techniques for plastics already. Making a prototype with this could be nice, but this will never produce anything on an industrial scale.
@@pingeee But only the CEO's will get paid, probably by robots who buy their products, the rest of us will have to illegally scavenge from their locked dumpsters because we'll all be jobless.
@@austinlopez5805 Everyone will most likely be given a set income to make sure they have enough for basic necessities, that's what Elon Musk predicts anyways
This video was too short. I would love a lot more information on this subject. I'm also quite partial to seeing more of the host. I always enjoy episodes with her in them.
The real breakthrough will be when you can print multiple materials at once. Things that include both plastic and metals, or multiple types of plastics. I know it can be done with multiple heads on a standard printer, but it’s very slow.
You want definite predictions for the future, call one of those psychic frauds. This is a science channel. They tell you about what could be and what is currently happening. They can't tell you what will definitely happen in the future any more than I can.
@@IgabodDobagi You are right, but think about it. We hear so much about the future, yet when it comes to implementation, there is always a 'can come in the future' or 'could come in the future'. We rarely ever hear 'will come in the future'. Don't you think so? Yes, the future is unpredictable, but do you think it is right to discuss about something which has not been properly tested or implemented yet? It just at times, feels more like creating hype about something without knowing if and when people will actually be able to use it.
@@GopalKrishna-yj2iw creating hype around a scientific theory or important discovery is what keeps the science game going man. There aren't an infinite amount of scientifically oriented people in the world. So you gotta get people excited about the science of the future to attract them toward that kind of stuff. The more people who hear about early developments, the more who might possibly devote themselves to studying and improving on said development. These videos serve as scientist recruitment videos as well as informing the layman of what is around the corner.
That's easy: Nothing useful at all. It's slow as heck and SLI resins are crap in basically every regard. The material strength is comparable to spaghetti, but at least spaghetti won't crumble into dust after being exposed to sunlight for a while.
This whole process is extremely expensive and will not at all have the practical application many think it will as it currently exist . I still am hopeful
You can get a SLA printers on amazon for 200 bucks already. I mean to be honest. All a SLA printer is, is some motors and a display that shines light onto the resin. Then resin does the rest.
You are 100% right. 3D printing cant compete with injection moulding (IM). It needs to check these 5 boxes, and the best pro machines out there are able to an mixture of 3, 4 and 5. hobby(200€) and midrange (50K €) maybe one of them depending on how you calculate it: 1. it needs to be able to print with the same materials. (3Dp has a few hundreds, IM has a few 100.000 variants.) The biggest material developers converts/creates a few materials a year for 3Dp, but often 1500-3000 materials for IM pr. manufacturer. And there are many material developers out there. 2. If the right material is available, it needs the same material properties as IM - but it cant have that as it is made in layers, low heat, no pressure. 3. it needs to be as cheap as IM and that includes the postprocessing. 4. it needs to be relatively fast compared to IM 5. it has to be able to hold production tolerances comparable to IM
Hi Seekers! Thanks for watching, want more on 3D printers? Check out this video here: ruclips.net/video/Yy-d5VVZlxQ/видео.html
Groovy...
@الكوابيس الثالثه gluons are virtual force carrying Boson particles.
Like gravitons vector bosons,and higgs bosons
I wonder how well it can print a wargaming miniature? Ca 28-32mm in hight.
So, at what speed is the picture from 2:52? 10x? 100x? Would you say its a bit lying to speak about a record breaking printer, then show it printing 10 or 100x speed? As if THATS the speed it can print at?
That sounds like science fiction, so cool
That's because it is.
@@off_Planet haters gonna hate
Oh, how about the nano-replicator ?
offPlanet Gene therapy also used to be Sci-Fi. Now it's reality.
3D printing is gonna be the future. Just like GMO crops and genetically enhanced humans. It's inevitable
@@MisterK9739 Maybe, but this ain't it. Also, 3D printing needs a miracle or two to be remotely competitive for large scale production of anything. For example, I love kickstarters boasting about their plastic parts being 3D printed - the actual most expensive method to produce anything from plastic that you need more than a handful of.
When the metal printers reach this throughput manufacturing will change forever.
MrPaceTv the person who invents it will make billions!
see www.titomic.com/titomic-kinetic-fusion.html
MrPaceTv Or when a polymer is created that has the structural characteristics of metal.
Well said
They don't need to. Metal additive manufacturing is only used for parts that are too difficult to machine on a 5 axis machine. Grain orientation is one of the most important thing in applications, which is very difficult to achieve with additive manufacturing, but easily achieved by forging followed by machining. It'a a balance, no component is 100% printed, only the parts that make sense to printed get printed.
There was a kickstarter project a few years ago that used the same technique of suspending the print fluid above an oil bath.
Really?
@72 degree pyramid technology Suppressed patents What relevance does that have to my comment?
I said there was a kickstarter project, etc.
ThexBorg he’s a crack head don’t mind him
@72 degree pyramid technology Suppressed patents dmt is cool and all but it's not a 5d printer lmao
Yes, two companies in the past proposed the same idea, and I recall reading both were trying to patent the idea with some dispute! Videos of their demos which are faster than this are below. The problem is, I found a hobbiest in forum earlier than that suggesting the same idea, which makes me wonder if all those ideas are being "derived" from that hobbiest, and the authors with the reviewers of this work just failed to highlight or cite such previous work!! Here is a video from 2015 of the NEXA3D using the same liquid barrier idea: ruclips.net/video/Jq93d4R8gLA/видео.html .. and video from 2016 from NewPro3D with similar claim: ruclips.net/video/uqYEOyBmyLM/видео.html ... The idea in this recent work of using mobile liquid compared to static liquid is unique and interesting but still thorough review and giving credit to previous work is fundamental in science. Some Likes please so this could be seen to give credit to previous work!
Do you guys remember the creation scene in Small Soldiers movie?
How fast can this 3D printer create a clone of itself?
Probably blocked from doing so. 😂
It can't it's mostly opaque polymer structures that it can pop print
@Shreyas Misra taps foot impatiently*
It's 2020 damnit, I was promised mind blowing future tech.
@Shreyas Misra A spaceship like that is called a Von Neumann Probe FYI :)
The Real KING the Lathe just told all 3D Printers to eat your Heart out...
Until they internalise the barb
& come up with a HARP With Plasitc & METAL Sintering Heads!
Thus it can Print T3's like Ice Cubes in a few hrs....Dooms Day from a Taunt!
We still need metallic and composite products, tho. I do salute the engineers behind this tech, not to make perfect the enemy of better.
There is metal 3d printers.
Yes there are many metal printers that are very fast now.
3D printing metal is very very very expensive. We have printers that can do it but no one wants to use it because of the cost and the number of metal 3D printers
Ye the showcased printer wont print strong enough parts. We need to lower the cost of metal 3d printers asap. Not this bs.
the showcased printer is a novelty. the shit it prints is so weak i doubt it could stand up to the weight of a single banana.
resin prints are horribly weak. horribly light sensitive. and extremely toxic in liquid state.
it's horrible technology.
and metal 3d printing is NOT fas at all.
the regular fdm metal printers (resembles a mig welding head on a 3d printer) are not fast at all. just as fast as any fdm printer.
the powder deposit printer are a little faster but they loose their speed because the prints need to go into a kiln for several hours.
2019: plastic straws are the enemy.
2020: faster 3d printing.
2021: 3D printed straws are killing the ocean.
What if you made a biodegradable resin (is that even possible)? Probably much better than those paper straws.
Or you know, you can reuse the completely reusable metal straws or even polymer straws instead of buying disposable ones like a peasant
Straws are too simple for 3d printing to bother with.
A step in the right direction, but that's still not very fast for many important applications, such as manufacturing, building materials, product customization, etc. Fortunately, a couple approaches are soon to bring 40-200 fold increases to that 7mm/min (1 foot to 5 feet per minute, depending on scale).
I really like the direction this channel took, Seeker is pretty cool again.
Yes that's very exciting....what they don't mention is specialty engineeered resins can cost 1,000s of dollars per litre..
Our chemical supplier suddenly discontinued a resin we use quite frequently, and the supposed 'replacement' was 4,700 dollars A PINT! (It wasn't a replacement, it was horrible for our application but let us survive for the nearly a year long process to find a suitable replacement)
I'm in the aerospace , and I've been into 3d printing since 2016 and noticed that high production was always the hurdle in 3DP , but I knew it was only a matter of time b4 the speed in printing would speed up. The future looks very good the limitless possibilities are endless and aerospace and space industries will produce a new generation of aerial vehicles that's a game changer. I'm going to purchase the Phenom by peopoly. Happy 3D printing 😁
How long till we can print whole body replacements?
does its need to keep on refilled the liquid?
3D printers have been around for over 30 years. But, a few cooperations kept them from the public until the patents ran out so that the people couldn’t just 3D print products for themselves.
Dear Seeker,
Please do a follow up on this.
Thank you
Is the demo speed up ? It's not very clearly indicated .
Yes. Heavily.
I hope 3D printing keeps getting better. Right now the only real use for 3D printing is custom toys. You want to hold your OC Sonic character? You got it. You want a weird geometric vase? Cool. You want literally anything else? Injection molding is probably better
The Dozers from Fraggle Rock clearly already had this tech in the 80s.
Sweeet, this is going to be near revolutionary
Still have the support limitations, which can be a big issue for some things.
Brilliant and simple solution! I'm so glad it'll only be sold at top dollar to big institutions until the patent runs out in 20 years.
waiting for 3D printer to be a-must-have for all people to print everything within their garage,like cars or all other similar things..no Storage&making fee and anything else..just buying the models and you are good to go to have everything built right in your house with much lesser cost/price.
Sounds impressive, but with what materials? I don’t see ubiquitous or practical use until 3D printing can merge multiple substances
plz make a video on the recent advancement in fusion tech through boron powder
I'd be interested in knowing what the margin for error is in this process. Is there any testing being done on the finished product for structural integrity? I can see this being utilized for a key component in some kind of machine. Then possibly failing. In turn making the case for more strict regulations on testing the parts for flaws. Unless of course the mere way it's produced leaves almost zero room for flaws.
But how does this work if you aren’t using plastics? Is this a renewable technology?
its just crazy to me how fast tech is growing within the recent years. If you think about how "primitiv" PCs for an example were in the 80-90 and what we are able to do now..... thats just crazy
So, can it only print in those grid like structures?
What's the short term and long term Environmental impacts of these products.
What is that oil anyhow? Is it Krytox or something similar? I know that stuff is very expensive.
What about resin biodegradability?
Now just make one
Ethan Johnston
There are quite a few SLA printers under 10k, just not this size.
SquiDragon yeah but the size isn’t the only thing that makes this very appealing. I am fine if it was only 20 * 15cm. It is the speed that makes it amazing. The Carbon M2 is very similar but is still >>>$10k
This is amazing. They didn’t explain it in the video for those who don’t know about 3D printing. For a home fda printer, the most common ones, printing a life size human head would take anywhere between 3-5 days depending on print settings. If you were to print something at the resolution of the printer in the video on a typical sla printer it would be at least a week if not more.
So to print a full size human in hours is truly revolutionary. Sla printers have gone from $20,000 to $1,000 in the span of 5 years, so even if this printer has a high price now it will go down very quickly.
Too bad pretty much all materials for these printers are completely useless. Come on, don't act as though these things will ever replace injection molding or even supplement production with otherwise tricky to produce parts.
Can we now incorporate this with graphene now? Or whatever the best material is right now
YAY NEW RARE CAR PARTS ON THE FLY!!!
VIVA REVOLUCION!!!
Can they make tyres form 3d printer .
What's the difference between HARP and CLIP?
Any c8 running around it ?
This looks straight up sci-fi. The world is pretty jacked up right now but there is some pretty neat stuff out there.
Curious to know about metal 3d printers..how much big they can print
SEEKER: QUESTION ON SPACE ???
I just finishing watching the last episode of Lost In Space on Netflix (season 2); when they finally get to their destination planet, they find it almost broken in half and in pieces.
My questions are:
1. Could you fly from the surface to those broken pieces of planet by commercial air flight or only by space ship if they were close enough together?
2. Are those pieces of planet habitable? Or could they become habitable again?
3. Could you venture into the spaces between the broken halves of the planet?
4. Would those pieces stay in place (like our planet and moon do) or eventually collide into each other with the force of gravity? Is the force of gravity effected?
5. What would life after a blow to a planet like that actually look like?
What if you use a 3d printer to print itself
Would it just create some kind of rip in the fabric of spacetime
@ZINDAO If you have a printer that prints itself into existence you certainly ripp spacetime...
Our future is now and it’s not what we expected but it’s all real and it’s here.
I think SLS printing should have been mentioned in this video.
Complicated metal parts for aerospace are becoming standard fair. From rocket nozzles to fuel injectors for turbines there are tons of highly complicated SLS parts being used in industrial settings around the world.
IMO, 3D printing is very good for low batch size fabrication, prototyping and eliminating the need for machining in metal parts. I doubt large batch injection molding will be surpassed by any form of 3D printing in the next 50 years, but I'll gladly eat crow if I'm wrong.
Good video!
Sounds like just a basic resin printer, but big
Jonesy Films
Exactly what I was thinking. This isn’t really new.
What is new is the layer of non-stick fluid that sits below the resin. Normally a SLA printer has to constantly lift and lower the build plate to break the print off the bottom membrane so a new layer can be formed. In this case, the print never sticks to the membrane, so a continuous print can be generated without the extra steps.
@@Tyraeous There is a paper published on the non-stick liquid layer in Science - science.sciencemag.org/content/366/6463/360
@@Rachel-if8hl so it's better than the ones Carbon use?
it literally is and doesnt claim not to be. the only reason its revolutionary is because it doesn't need to wait long between layers
SLA exist since 80s. Infact it's first 3D printing technology to ever exist. These days you can by resin based 3D printer for under 300$ Although instead of laser they use a LCD with UV light behind it. Which is still very good (better than FDM quality atleast) You can check out Maker's Muse review of Anycubic Photon or Elegoo Mars (one I prefer).
Awesome video and super cool I do have to say! Excited for the future
Ok, so what is the print time?
Now they just need multiple light emitters along a conveyor trough of continually replenished resin that they can run the production head along, so that it starts at one end clean, and comes out the other fully printed. That way they have one long, continuous printing line.
Somebody should make a RUclips plugin that puts up an image of a frog every time somebody's voice dips low enough to vocal fry. Or maybe an image of somebody scratching a chalkboard.
Can you do a video how this UV cureable resin is manufactured. It's cost is still quite high...
Oh you need 2K heart valves. Press a button just waits 20 minutes.
idk separating by flowing oil degrades the printing surface
this is awesome! I love watching the 3D printing industry evolve! So cool! thanks for sharing
What about the set up of your party.. overhangs the time input for those.. this is your easy part. Show us and wow us with the ability to generate automatic overhang generators and this ability to print fast. Using all types of resin. Or even colored parts.
How does it compete with carbon m1?
Also curious about this. Anyone know?
What's the price I'm gonna but it
3,000 dollars or more
@@KevinTheProto5019 they are making commercial printers, those range from 10k to 300k depending on the use
@@omagro8267 aight
Sorry so this would be the same technology as the Carbon M1 printer, just scaled up? (not trying to sound rude)
The background song pls?
HASSN ELMZAH darude sandstorm
@@whynotbecauseican thx dude
not quite fast yet. but this is getting closer to the future. as humans we will optimize
Printing big is one thing, printing accurately is another. All 3D printing I've seen is relatively crude and requires a lot of manual finishing work to achieve quality approaching what you can form with "conventional" plastic moulding (which is often quicker too). That goes for low end consumer printing and expensive industrial printers. The featured one in this video looks like they sacrificed quality for size and speed.
i actually have come up with a SIMPLE low cost 3d printer design that will be much faster than traditional low cost (
might use as much recycled cast aluminum for many of the parts of the printers as well
🤔 but does it have the capacity to be used as a product and not just prototype. Does it hold up the same?
Yet more time laps of SLA. NEXT!
This looks soooooo sci fi incredible.
It printed all lattices, the easiest thing for an SLA printer to print. Show me how well and how fast you print a solid cube.
Almost 3 years ago I had the same idea of using liquid interface to reduce adhesion in SLA/DLP and speed the process up. I digged deep to see if someone has done, and found two companies both have the same idea, and I recall reading both were trying to patent the idea with some dispute! Videos of their demos which are faster than this are below. The problem is, I found a hobbiest in forum earlier than that suggesting the same idea, which makes me wonder if all those ideas are being "derived" from that hobbiest, and the authors with the reviewers of this work and other just failed to highlight or cite such previous work!! Video from 2015 of the NEXA3D using the same concept: ruclips.net/video/Jq93d4R8gLA/видео.html .. and video from 2016 from NewPro3D with similar claim: ruclips.net/video/uqYEOyBmyLM/видео.html ... The idea in this recent work of using mobile liquid compared to static liquid is unique and interesting but still thorough review and giving credit to previous work is fundamental in science. Some Likes please so this could be seen to give credit to previous work!
I think what I've discovered is that as society and access to information progresses, we should expect to see more and more of these types of coincident ideas taking place. It happens much more often than one would intuitively expect.
Guess what: more than two people can have the exact same idea.
Whenever watching videos about development in 3D printing technology, I always remember the use case where an austronaut can get different tools printed remotely by instructions from earth. I don't see this printer working in space however, because the liquid will not stay put.
It could stay put due to viscosity and surface spread, if it was injected around the base from a series of large syringes, and hydrophilic surface extended it into the intersecting lasers, but hydrophobic surface on the base and surrounding walls stopped the surface layer from sliding too high up the walls.
So, I can print an army of life sized Miku's fast? I see major profit
I remember at the start of the film Small Soldiers they use this technology. That shit is in the 90s
So are flat, large tv's. Doesn't make it super-visionary.
I do apologize, but I fail to see what point your making. Do you agree with my statement?
@@KusholaCam My point is they just made something that looks flashy and visually, aesthetically pleasing. They did NOT actually know holographic resin printers would become a reality and look kinda like that. It doesn't mean anything.
Ahhhh i get you now brotatoe
I just commented the same thing then saw your comment 😂😂😂
CAN IT PRINT ANOTHER 3D PRINTER?😆
Well, if you give it the materials.
Maybe
Not until it can print a motor.
Well that is essentially the end practical goal really. If you want the machine to be further long-lasting in an isolated environment where parts might be scarce.
all u really need is a 3d printer to make parts and an ai assembler and it can make as many 3d printers as you have materials for
fill such a structure made with a strong alloy with carbon foam and you've got the makings of the building blocks of some rather interesting thingys
Thing is, this abomination can't print metal. It really cant even print useful plastics. These things look all sci fi and techy, but in the end they're completely useless due to the material properties of the prints.
Is this resin recyclable?
I feel like I see this video every 6 months or so..
It's works in space?
So we can basically print small parts with the size of a a dozen cm in literally a few minutes.
Wish they would also invent an LCD made for printing, normal LCDs used for printers dies after a few hundred hours of printing.
People are going to have to learn to cope with few jobs left for us to do. Bring out our poets and artists and bring on education as our first objective.
In the future if robots do all the work for us, then we don't have to work anymore, we'll have a the free time in the world to do whatever we want
This won't steal any jobs mate. This slow monstrosity of semi-informed hype is outclassed by decade-old large scale manufacturing techniques for plastics already.
Making a prototype with this could be nice, but this will never produce anything on an industrial scale.
@@pingeee But only the CEO's will get paid, probably by robots who buy their products, the rest of us will have to illegally scavenge from their locked dumpsters because we'll all be jobless.
@@austinlopez5805 Everyone will most likely be given a set income to make sure they have enough for basic necessities, that's what Elon Musk predicts anyways
Cool! Now use Ocean plastic from the Pacific garbage patch & I'm sold.
But why do we have just this one short clip of it actually doing something?
Look up the mamoth printer from materialise. It is bigger and just as fast.
3D printers were originally made to prototype products and objects. They were never originally intended to be used as a means of mass production.
Exciting stuff to see, not gonna pander lol. We're a few years off before I start to see this in my college's labs probably. Give or take a year or 2.
When can I buy one for under $1000?
Besides faster rapid prototyping, what will this change in the real world?
can it use chirelium? :)
If there's a Moore's law for 3d printing, then it is going to be fantastic. Looks so sci-fi with the lights and coming out of the vat.
This video was too short. I would love a lot more information on this subject. I'm also quite partial to seeing more of the host. I always enjoy episodes with her in them.
We are getting closer and closer to a real star fleet replicater
and now... imagine a TERMINATOR T-1000 straight out from that liquid pool..
The real breakthrough will be when you can print multiple materials at once. Things that include both plastic and metals, or multiple types of plastics. I know it can be done with multiple heads on a standard printer, but it’s very slow.
Wasn’t this part of terminator, the liquid terminators are pulled from pools just like this
Why is it always 'Could'?
Why not 'Will'?
In the title
Because its not final and there could some other break through before it is.
You want definite predictions for the future, call one of those psychic frauds. This is a science channel. They tell you about what could be and what is currently happening. They can't tell you what will definitely happen in the future any more than I can.
@@IgabodDobagi You are right, but think about it. We hear so much about the future, yet when it comes to implementation, there is always a 'can come in the future' or 'could come in the future'. We rarely ever hear 'will come in the future'. Don't you think so?
Yes, the future is unpredictable, but do you think it is right to discuss about something which has not been properly tested or implemented yet? It just at times, feels more like creating hype about something without knowing if and when people will actually be able to use it.
@@GopalKrishna-yj2iw creating hype around a scientific theory or important discovery is what keeps the science game going man. There aren't an infinite amount of scientifically oriented people in the world. So you gotta get people excited about the science of the future to attract them toward that kind of stuff. The more people who hear about early developments, the more who might possibly devote themselves to studying and improving on said development. These videos serve as scientist recruitment videos as well as informing the layman of what is around the corner.
Because even the former is either a straight-up lie for clickbait or a sign of the immeasurable naivete and incompetence of the Seeker team.
Looks good, sounds good, lets see what it can do in praxis.
That's easy: Nothing useful at all. It's slow as heck and SLI resins are crap in basically every regard. The material strength is comparable to spaghetti, but at least spaghetti won't crumble into dust after being exposed to sunlight for a while.
Someone's in LOOOVEEE!!!!!!!!!
People are gonna look back at this video couple years from now and see the speed of this printer and laugh.
This is one of our main future
I need monotonically colored ABS. This is neat, but a non-starter for some applications.
This whole process is extremely expensive and will not at all have the practical application many think it will as it currently exist .
I still am hopeful
What are you talking about what process is expensive? The Teflon oil? because SLA printing is at an all time low in terms of cost.
You can get a SLA printers on amazon for 200 bucks already. I mean to be honest. All a SLA printer is, is some motors and a display that shines light onto the resin. Then resin does the rest.
You are 100% right. 3D printing cant compete with injection moulding (IM).
It needs to check these 5 boxes, and the best pro machines out there are able to an mixture of 3, 4 and 5. hobby(200€) and midrange (50K €) maybe one of them depending on how you calculate it:
1. it needs to be able to print with the same materials. (3Dp has a few hundreds, IM has a few 100.000 variants.) The biggest material developers converts/creates a few materials a year for 3Dp, but often 1500-3000 materials for IM pr. manufacturer. And there are many material developers out there.
2. If the right material is available, it needs the same material properties as IM - but it cant have that as it is made in layers, low heat, no pressure.
3. it needs to be as cheap as IM and that includes the postprocessing.
4. it needs to be relatively fast compared to IM
5. it has to be able to hold production tolerances comparable to IM
@@jonjessen it doesn't have to compete and it can also complement injection moulding.