Hinduism & Buddhism: Comparison/Contrast
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- In answer to a viewer's request we discuss the similarities and differences between Hinduism and Buddhism, and address the common belief that the Buddha was a Hindu reformer.
Venerable Ajahn Punnadhammo's RUclips channel:
/ ajahnpunnadhammo
URL Links
linktr.ee/pann...
current blog (mostly philosophy and caustic critiques of Marxism): politicallyinc...
website: pannobhasa.org
Minds page: www.minds.com/...
Bitchute channel: www.bitchute.c...
Rumble channel: rumble.com/use...
RUclips channel: / @pannobhasa
SubscribeStar support page: www.subscribes...
Discord server (mainly for traditionalist Buddhist discussions and networking): link available on request
Twitter: / pannobhasasc
Paypal: www.paypal.com...
CashApp: $pannobhasa
MY BOOK, “Essays in Theravada Buddhism”: www.amazon.com...
ALSO, MY OTHER BOOK, “Philosophical Dharma”: www.amazon.com...
3rd BOOK, “Buddhist Ethics, Buddhist Practice”: www.amazon.com...
Thank you for taking my request David, will listen with great interest! 🙏🏻
This "Buddhism and..." series is good. Next you could do Buddhism and Jainism (theres plenty in the suttas), Buddhism and Shamanism (is buddhism Bon even dhamma?), Buddhism and death penalty or Buddhism and cigarettes :)
Lord Buddhas teaching illuminates the way for mankind to cross from a world of darkness, hatred and suffering to a new world of light, love and happiness. There is no blind beliefs
Thank you three for the very interesting discussion. One interesting consequence of Buddhism "domesticating" Brahma and Indra is that they came along with the Mahayana pantheon into China and beyond. As a result, there are native names for the two in China, Vietnam, Korea, and Japan. I know in Japan, Brahma is called Bonten and Indra is called Taishakuten. Those countries also have minor cults for the two, moreso for Brahma.
Full Vajrayana's lineage Mahayoga, Anuyoga and Atiyoga came from Vajrapani on the hill of Malaya. And Buddha did turned third wheel to the King indrabodhi but not fully tantrayana. And king Indrabodhi's Tantrayana lineage survived till today.
Most Westerners people don't know the indept history of India. They only know the propaganda of the Brahmanic version. There is no religion called Hinduism its a tern for geography and its people. Today's Hinduism is the new form of Brahmanism with the copy paste of Bhudism especially the Vajrayana tradition, through which they wiped out bhudism from india and nepal.
People keep saying that, though there is an easy definition of a Hindu: a person who considers the Vedas to be authoritative. It's obviously not just geographical because not all Indians are Hindus. Indian Muslims, for example, are not Hindus.
That can’t be true from their scriptures in which they curse Brahma for lying and lusting and therefore brahmanical vedas are derived from such a being.
Hindu texts pretty much state they cursed each other and every god.
This is the mess Lord Buddha saved us from.
The Hindus at least recognize the forehead as the region in which realisation happens. It does not happen "just anywhere". And once you recognize that centres in the body are where realisation occurs, then you begin to see structure. And that structure includes the relationship between the individual and the source. The Hindus also know the difference between the personal and impersonal aspects of realisation. Personal can mean human or a personhood of a higher dimension.
For most meditators they do not achieve the sensitivity to determine these things. Most people for instance cannot tell the difference between sensing things in the physical body, and emotions. They use the word "feel" to mean a wide variety of phenomena.
Once you are able to discern carefully the functional centres and their relationship to realised states, then an understanding of the inner structure begins and then the conversation becomes more interesting.
When you go into a new space, a pure space of realisation, you might think it is empty and that nothing else exists, you might think you are God or that God does not exist, you might think there is no relationship to your previous domain, or that you have no relationship with anything.
All these are superficial attitudes and stem from little comprehension or sensitivity in the new domain, and no real conceptual guides for living in it. This has created much confusion about the spiritual path, and hatred or denial of human life. Humans have a few realisers who have entered the new domain but few who really understand it.
What is the relationship between the human state and the realised state ? On another scale you can ask :
Is there no relationship of thought to feeling or to the physical ? Are these 3 worlds separate, or are they simply progressions of each other.
We can be grateful that entering a realised domain causes the madness to end, because it provides true stability for the first time; however there is relationship to our previous state.
Some concepts like "there is no God" are useful tools for practice because they cause you to withdraw certain crutches you may have and assist penetration of a new domain. These tools have an effect inside, but they may not be conceptually accurate. They are sharp coarse distinctions that are useful for a time.
This is an important difference because a conceptual tool and an absolute concept are different things.
too complicated
Tantric tradition has got no influence of Hinduism but more of Greek influence with an archaeological evidence of Gandaran development of Buddhism where many Greeks gods were depicted in Buddhist iconography
Idiot Tantric practice grew from shaivaism and shaktisim,jeez do some study
Wow check Brian's House ! The life of Brian he's cool seriously 😉He is seeking I admire his sincerity 😉
What good is a nice house doing you don't have a brain in your head.?
Actually caste system is banned in india,very few people actually follow caste system
Buddhism is entirely different from hindunism
Not true
They are similar enough that both accept karma and rebirth, for example, and also ancient Indian cosmology. Both accept the idea of escaping or transcending Samsara as the highest goal, higher than any heaven.
No only difference is budhist don't believe in God
Don’t make statements if you have not done an investigation. hindus have only 7 heavens, Buddhists have 29 and there are heavens with only Buddhists and Buddhists have PURE lands as well different from heavens which are created by Buddhas.
And hindu karma is by birth only whereas Buddhist karma is a part of the Patita samutpada cycle.
Transcending samsara for Hindus means union with Brahma of the 7th heaven - they want union with their god.
Buddhist Nirvana is state of unconditioned reality.
HUGE Difference. To even say they are the same is an offense in this day and age when you have internet to get the correct info.
Western people think hindusm and buddhism is same but your though is totally wrong
because Western people don't understand pali language
They just read sanskrit translate
But in buddha time no hindusm
religion.
Hindusm is totally copy from mahayani.
And mahayani is not original buddhism.
Why write crap if you don’t know anything
Idiot, buddha born in Sanatan dharma household.This is what you get after graduating from whatsapp University
Mahayan is a mix between buddhisim and vaishnava hindusim
Buddhism and Advaita Vendanta comparison would be good.
The most mixed teachings nowdays.
The Buddha did to Hinduism what Martin Luther did to Catholicism - opened it up to all (or most) and stripped away the bells and smells. But, at its core, it is still a Hindu conception.
That's an anachronism because in the Buddha's time Hinduism didn't even exist. Also Buddhism denies the authority of the Vedas and denies any sort of Atman. Buddhism is more derived from the pre-Vedic shramana traditions that probably originated in the prehistoric Indus Valley Civilization, along with other systems like Jainism and (atheistic) Sankhya.
@@pannobhasa Correct, but if I had said that… who would have understood me except you and a handful of others? Namo Buddhaya.
No sanatan dharma existed way before buddhisim,there are too many archeological proves.
@Boulanger948 simplification is not lying
@Boulanger948 then your opinion is accepted… by you. I am more than content with that fact.
Buddist have only one it is nota heaven it is called as nirvanaya
Absolute drivel. Buddha himself was an Indian yogi. And everything he said had already been said.
Lol here we go with Hindus claiming everything is hindu😂
@@mogambo4565 not a Hindu. But Buddha was an Indian yogi. Just facts. Don't get triggered.
@@directdemocracy133 nothing called Hindu that time. Don't get triggered Hinduism is only a sect of buddhism which was taken over by brahmins after fall of buddhism. If you do excavations you will only find buddhist and jain art and old temples. Don't be fooled by Indian media they are good at hiding buddhist things especially what they found under babri masjid 😉
@mogambo4565 Hinduism is the oldest religion on Earth. You people living in India obviously have some serious inter faith issues if you can not even agree to established facts.
Depends on what you mean by Hinduism. BTW there was no Krishna, Hanuman, Games or Shiva during Buddha's time.