the reason for the difference in grenades in WW1-WW2 was for the Allies especially for Amarica baseball was a favorite pastime Cricket for the British hence the spherical design of our grenades for the Axis namely Germany & Italy were Ax throwing was a normal pastime for them hence the Stalgrenade or stick grenade so a little history lesson for everyone 😊
There is also a distinction between what are casually called "offensive" vs "defensive" grenades. Offensive are meant to be used when attacking/charging so the stick gives extra range, and they typically have a thin jacket so there isn't too much shrapnel. Basically, you are charging in the open, so you want to a grenade you can throw far enough ahead of you that you aren't going to be hit with it. These tapered off after WW1, though they still were used by Germany in WW2, likely because of the intended rush/blitz tactics. Defensive grenades on the other hand are what we are mostly used to today, where they throw out a lot of shrapnel in a wide radius, and they are intended to be used from behind cover, such as when defending a trench or other position from an enemy charge.
I love that Nate starts talking about a “shooting farm” before the video gets to them talking about Cambodian gun ranges where they actually let you blow up animals. Made me laugh even harder. Can tell you guys are super informed given all the extra weapons talk, I don’t know much about them myself.
Hey Nate, I assume since neither of you mentioned it that you must not know, but the guy who said he was going to fire the gun in “full, semiautomatic,” was a general. Lt. general Mark Hertling. Which just makes his lack of knowledge that much more impressive.
It is evident that general was nothing more then an "office chair" that got his position through time in and politics, and not for knowledge and ability.
Personally I think you should also see the episodes based on monsters and mythology from Incognito Mode. Ordinary Things is in those videos too and they’re pretty great
When using a suppressor on a weapon; you are also meant to equip what's known as "sub-sonic" ammunition to allow the suppressor to do its job completely. In the Silenced or Un-Silenced section; it sounds like they were firing regular ammunition. You'll notice a distinct "crack" noise everytime he fires. This is the sound of the bullet breaking the sound barrier. Sub-sonic ammunition travels at a speed below the speed of sound to not make the loud cracking noise you hear when firing a firearm. That's how you get your classic video game suppressor sounds, and why everyone is upset when they hear an actual "suppressed" firearm in action; because its technically not all the way there yet.
Not wrong, but also not entirely accurate. A super sonic round will put out around 140db on its own, and is not hearing safe. Sub sonic ammo is required for your ears to not ring after every shot, but it is still decently loud. For comparison, consider how much movies love the sound of racking a slide on a firearm, and how loud even that action is. Then remember that is happening faster and louder than when a person does it literally every time the trigger is pulled. Suppressor makers don't bother to make a suppressor more effective than that because there is no point making it quieter than the mechanism. The only time those are made is for small caliber manual operating firearms, like bolt action carbines
I didn't really have contraband when I was a kid, my parents were cool (watched Blade when I was 5 and played Diablo when I was like 6). But if someone came to a sleepover and gave like, horror movies I haven't seen before, I would declare him my best friend in the world. Those kids didn't deserve Ordinary Things as a friend
For Internet Historian's Asian driver thing, I think it might be because most of their cars are rear engine, so the "trunk" is actually in the front of the car, and it's just easier to load everything in that way.
@@quietone2674 well I saw he used a us and japanese parking lot as examples, the us one was the slanted and the Japanese one was uniformly straight. Thought driving on the left as to the right would have made a difference in how parking lots were designed and the means and method of parking in them.
It's just a safety thing, when I was working for Amazon they would prohibit us to park the cars from the front, like that you don't rear into traffic, I imagine it's something done by all asian companies.
On the off chance you happen to look down in the comments at just the right moment, I believe there are two prominent incognito channel videos you haven’t reacted to yet. Mythology And Monsters. Both are really great videos in this same style.
My opinion on guns is that i do think we need better gun control laws, but we also need to make sure those laws are designed so that responsible gun owners can get what they need to protect themselves just in case a crazy person ever slips past any tight regulations we could have in place to keep guns in the hands of responsible people as opposed to you know... In the hands of a mass shooter. Unfortunately, with todays politicians it is incredibly difficult to find middle ground. Those far enough left want guns banned period, not a good idea, but those far enough right seem to really not give a shit about whose hands a gun gets into. I think that a complete ban on guns goes too far, but just letting people buy guns all willy-nilly like the right wants is probably why we have so many mass shooting nowadays, we are just not doing enough to vet potential gun owners so that a psychopath does not get a hold of one and murder a bunch of people. We need to strike a PERFECT balance in regards to gun policy, you should be able to get them but only if there are guardrails meant to keep any lunatics from getting a hold of them.
Oh no, the RPG-7 can definitely blow up on you. Old Soviet export weapons were often cheapened. Combine that with neglect and an untold number of rounds fired downrange, and you're setting yourself up for a kaboom. That's why the military ordered PSRL-1s and GS-777s some years back- lighter than the RPG-7, same functionality, more modular, and far less likely to have a catastrophic failure during training or allied usage.
In my country is you're like on a job place or college something like that and you don't park your car backwards you would be bullied because every one just thinks you're not good enough driving to park properly (and yes that's considered the proper way)
nick is right guns are cool cause it means you can go out and just end someone's life as easily as physically moving your finger but that doesn't mean im guna go out and do it just because i can physically do it
@@Aniyah-CHG depends on the loading as far as I can tell. 7.62x39 apparently has a tendency to just dump energy on impact (probably because it's like trying to throw a boulder, it will damage on impact, but is easily stopped) but 7.62x54R will be better because there's more powder. Bullet shape and material it is made out of will also affect penetration, but in general it's the powder to bullet weight ratio (as far as I can tell).
Anyone whole complains about a AR pattern rifle having to much kick doesn't know what they're talking about. Drill Sergeants in the Army will take the rifle, put it right on their junk and fire the the thing on full auto. To show to show the recruits that they have no reason to fear the recoil. (I'm sure if they were allowed to the DS would have the privates do that too. But recent times have been limiting what the DSs are allowed to do.) Also that full semiautomatic guy is either a current or former US Army General. Which makes that clip both all the better and worse.
I like your views on guns. Not demonizing the inanimate object or the responsible users of them. And acknowledging they are just a tool. Even better is how you described bringing the shotgun out just for a bit. You checked and checked again, and your friend checked once it was in his possession. That's gun control right there. Though the whole 5.56 vs the 7.62 and .45 thing was a bit off. It really depends on what you classify as "power". In terms of hitting a person and going through armor, lighter, faster, more dense rounds are good like specific 5.56 loads. Standard 9mm goes through armor better than .45ACP does because of it's smaller surface area and higher velocity. Unless someone gets AP rounds, .45ACP is a non issue for pretty much any armor.
I’m part Asian, and I don’t park facing forward cuz turning the car around and backing up is too much of an inconvenience especially if the parking garage is narrow. Yeah, backing out of there is also an inconvenience….
wow you two really LOVE the sound of your own voices huh?! It's so annoying how much I have to hit the fast forward button to get back to the ACTUAL REACTION!!
Wait, Tim Cook is on CNN!? 😳 He's the main guy who tells the traffic and news report on the radio station I listen to in the car, I never knew he was on an actually need channel...
What if all of greek mythology was just their equivalent of memes... and the trident is for fisherman was an earlier meme so someone made it into a new meme where the god of the sea holds one! I mean these days it's written as they were actually believed to be gods but if not for the age of science wouldn't super saiyan shaggy and his legend would grow and we'd call it mythology in the distant future and people would look back thinking we believed in a god called shaggy xD... ya see my point we don't know they may of just been a practical joke there were philosophers back then with the mind to think about the future so why not pranks on future civilisations!
47:33 he doesn't know what he is talking about. he didn't say what grenade he was talking about. because in the military nothing happens intel you throw it and the handle is released in the process. the handle being released is what starts the process. good idea to say nothing if you don't know everything about something. what you said about the car running one over could happen
12:41 It's annoying when people think that being pro-gun-control being such a anti-gun. Like guns, we do need them - especially if you live somewhere out in the country we're helping less likely to get to you. But imo you don't need an automatic rifle in a densely populated urban area unless you plan to kill bystanders, and the only reason you would need a silencer in an urban population is if you want to be a gas station sniper. Gun should have the minimal amount of testing and control that you need in order to drive a car, even moreso you need to be psychologically evaluated to make sure that you're not prone to shoot up a school anytime soon. Teenagers should not be able to get their hands on a gun easily. Different states should have different regulations on what can and cannot be allowed, but naturally there should be a standardized bar that you need to have in order to get your hands on a weapon that is only meant to take a life. Edit: spelling and S-T-T fuck ups
@RCTaliesin I have nothing against their discussions, its what I like about their reactions, but if I had to guess why they had longer ones here I'd say probably because of the topic of the video being something that Nate has strong feelings about. I live in the UK so I've not really got much to say on the topic of guns, but I imagine I'd feel different if I were in Nate's position.
Oh my god you whiny manbabies, A lot of the reasons they have to pause under fair use they have to make it transformative so they have to talk and pause but I guess your pea brains can’t get that
@@REDIVY78 Yeah they usually do that but not to this extent. Look at their other In The Field reactions, not a single one is even close to an hour long.
@@sirboomsalot4902 difference between saying nothing and interrupting a video taking away from the impact of what's being said. That's why reactors should rewind the video by 5 seconds after a pause in my opinion
@@trocoplaytv1254 I agree my issue with them was stopping what feels like every minute or so ruining the flow and impact of what was happening in the video. You don’t need to react to every statement said but rather the each topic as a whole it’s a balance.
@@nonautemrexchristus5637 True. But, Elon Musk gave us affordable Electric Cars, High Speed Satellite Internet, and a frickin flamethrower just for fun. What has Jim Jeffries done in comparison?
KERMIT tries to get us CANCELLED in GARTIC PHONE...: ruclips.net/video/qjUqF-p8DF8/видео.html
the reason for the difference in grenades in WW1-WW2 was for the Allies especially for Amarica baseball was a favorite pastime Cricket for the British hence the spherical design of our grenades for the Axis namely Germany & Italy were Ax throwing was a normal pastime for them hence the Stalgrenade or stick grenade so a little history lesson for everyone 😊
Huh, noticed the difference in day of defeat, never thought about why they were designed as throwable sticks.
There is also a distinction between what are casually called "offensive" vs "defensive" grenades.
Offensive are meant to be used when attacking/charging so the stick gives extra range, and they typically have a thin jacket so there isn't too much shrapnel. Basically, you are charging in the open, so you want to a grenade you can throw far enough ahead of you that you aren't going to be hit with it. These tapered off after WW1, though they still were used by Germany in WW2, likely because of the intended rush/blitz tactics.
Defensive grenades on the other hand are what we are mostly used to today, where they throw out a lot of shrapnel in a wide radius, and they are intended to be used from behind cover, such as when defending a trench or other position from an enemy charge.
QQQQ
Q
And Soviet stock greanades
Tom Cruise’s middle tooth was specifically designed for pulling grenade pins.
you could be kidding for real but since that movie hes done ennough shit to make me believe hes always been that unhinged
I love that Nate starts talking about a “shooting farm” before the video gets to them talking about Cambodian gun ranges where they actually let you blow up animals. Made me laugh even harder.
Can tell you guys are super informed given all the extra weapons talk, I don’t know much about them myself.
18:54
44:25
All i know is theyre shooty ahooty bang bang thingies
When they were talking about foot weapons, I was thinking of that girl from Fullmetal Alchemist with the automail legs who had a cannon in her knee.
Paninya. Loved her character
Completely forgot about that. Appreciate the reminder
Sick, I gotta go finish that series when I get the chance.
Hey Nate, I assume since neither of you mentioned it that you must not know, but the guy who said he was going to fire the gun in “full, semiautomatic,” was a general. Lt. general Mark Hertling. Which just makes his lack of knowledge that much more impressive.
That’s a real non-Infantry commissioned officer moment right there
It is evident that general was nothing more then an "office chair" that got his position through time in and politics, and not for knowledge and ability.
Here you go 1:28
Thanks Caleb
Thanks Caleb
Thanks caleb
His name is obviously Charles, not Caleb.
I know about the Caleb thing, so don't get offended.
26:16 "his head is gone, so..."
Courier 6: "just a flesh wound."
Personally I think you should also see the episodes based on monsters and mythology from Incognito Mode. Ordinary Things is in those videos too and they’re pretty great
I figured they didn’t like him personally because he’s in all the ones they seemed to skip over…
@@InternetHydra Did he have some type of drama or some opinion they might not like? Either that, or it's maybe just a coincidence?
@@RS-fy9hb I just made a bland assumption based on only his episodes being uncovered.
@@RS-fy9hb I think it might’ve been as simple as them not caring for those particular topics.
When using a suppressor on a weapon; you are also meant to equip what's known as "sub-sonic" ammunition to allow the suppressor to do its job completely. In the Silenced or Un-Silenced section; it sounds like they were firing regular ammunition. You'll notice a distinct "crack" noise everytime he fires. This is the sound of the bullet breaking the sound barrier. Sub-sonic ammunition travels at a speed below the speed of sound to not make the loud cracking noise you hear when firing a firearm. That's how you get your classic video game suppressor sounds, and why everyone is upset when they hear an actual "suppressed" firearm in action; because its technically not all the way there yet.
Not wrong, but also not entirely accurate. A super sonic round will put out around 140db on its own, and is not hearing safe.
Sub sonic ammo is required for your ears to not ring after every shot, but it is still decently loud.
For comparison, consider how much movies love the sound of racking a slide on a firearm, and how loud even that action is. Then remember that is happening faster and louder than when a person does it literally every time the trigger is pulled.
Suppressor makers don't bother to make a suppressor more effective than that because there is no point making it quieter than the mechanism. The only time those are made is for small caliber manual operating firearms, like bolt action carbines
Also, what a actually makes the most noise is the action, the slide and the hammer
42:50 OK, now I want to know what Nic said.
Same
unfortunately it's patrons only 😟
Alllllright so who here has watched the patron version?
I would type it out, but that would put me on a watchlist
@@wessltov No it won't. Please do it! *Palpatine* Do it!
The sad part is the guy who said “full, semi-automatic” was/is a US Army general.
I didn't really have contraband when I was a kid, my parents were cool (watched Blade when I was 5 and played Diablo when I was like 6). But if someone came to a sleepover and gave like, horror movies I haven't seen before, I would declare him my best friend in the world. Those kids didn't deserve Ordinary Things as a friend
Gravy is what you get when you cook meat. You can thicken it whit flour a bit if you just use butter and flour that's a sauce.
Nate: Shotgun ammo isn’t that expensive
Well that didn’t age well.
For Internet Historian's Asian driver thing, I think it might be because most of their cars are rear engine, so the "trunk" is actually in the front of the car, and it's just easier to load everything in that way.
And in japan I think they drive on the left side of the road to, unlike the us and alike.
@@minedgammer don't see how that would affect parking.
@@quietone2674 well I saw he used a us and japanese parking lot as examples, the us one was the slanted and the Japanese one was uniformly straight. Thought driving on the left as to the right would have made a difference in how parking lots were designed and the means and method of parking in them.
@@minedgammer hm...maybe. Was going to say that I think some US parking lots are slanted, but now I don't actually know.
It's just a safety thing, when I was working for Amazon they would prohibit us to park the cars from the front, like that you don't rear into traffic, I imagine it's something done by all asian companies.
You should make a Re-Watch of Monthy Python and the Holy Grail for the channel. At least with one person who havent seen it
On the off chance you happen to look down in the comments at just the right moment, I believe there are two prominent incognito channel videos you haven’t reacted to yet.
Mythology
And
Monsters.
Both are really great videos in this same style.
Anyone realizes the “jump the GUN”
My opinion on guns is that i do think we need better gun control laws, but we also need to make sure those laws are designed so that responsible gun owners can get what they need to protect themselves just in case a crazy person ever slips past any tight regulations we could have in place to keep guns in the hands of responsible people as opposed to you know... In the hands of a mass shooter.
Unfortunately, with todays politicians it is incredibly difficult to find middle ground. Those far enough left want guns banned period, not a good idea, but those far enough right seem to really not give a shit about whose hands a gun gets into.
I think that a complete ban on guns goes too far, but just letting people buy guns all willy-nilly like the right wants is probably why we have so many mass shooting nowadays, we are just not doing enough to vet potential gun owners so that a psychopath does not get a hold of one and murder a bunch of people. We need to strike a PERFECT balance in regards to gun policy, you should be able to get them but only if there are guardrails meant to keep any lunatics from getting a hold of them.
Gosh.. I remember when my dad thought that way.... quite the funeral that one..
36:37 I like how sam o'nella made a brief appearance
Oh no, the RPG-7 can definitely blow up on you. Old Soviet export weapons were often cheapened. Combine that with neglect and an untold number of rounds fired downrange, and you're setting yourself up for a kaboom. That's why the military ordered PSRL-1s and GS-777s some years back- lighter than the RPG-7, same functionality, more modular, and far less likely to have a catastrophic failure during training or allied usage.
In my country is you're like on a job place or college something like that and you don't park your car backwards you would be bullied because every one just thinks you're not good enough driving to park properly (and yes that's considered the proper way)
nick is right guns are cool cause it means you can go out and just end someone's life as easily as physically moving your finger but that doesn't mean im guna go out and do it just because i can physically do it
The favorite caliber of gun .45acp anti-cow projectile
(Paraphrasing)
"5.56 is very fast, but not known for power. If you want power you go for 7.62 or a .45 slug"
Certified fudd right here
Isn't the 5.56 better at penetration too?
Fuddlore
@@Aniyah-CHG depends on the loading as far as I can tell. 7.62x39 apparently has a tendency to just dump energy on impact (probably because it's like trying to throw a boulder, it will damage on impact, but is easily stopped) but 7.62x54R will be better because there's more powder. Bullet shape and material it is made out of will also affect penetration, but in general it's the powder to bullet weight ratio (as far as I can tell).
You got the game theory drip
If someone mentions that they watch CNN or Fox News you roll an ad
Sausage biscuits and gravy along with Irish Benedict are absolute S-Tier meals period.
16:14 isn't it also to make it harder for your targets to triangulate where you are shooting from?
48:56 I have the same thing. I was born with an extra numerary, so my mouth is off center because of that extra tooth.
Anyone whole complains about a AR pattern rifle having to much kick doesn't know what they're talking about. Drill Sergeants in the Army will take the rifle, put it right on their junk and fire the the thing on full auto. To show to show the recruits that they have no reason to fear the recoil. (I'm sure if they were allowed to the DS would have the privates do that too. But recent times have been limiting what the DSs are allowed to do.)
Also that full semiautomatic guy is either a current or former US Army General. Which makes that clip both all the better and worse.
I saw a lock picking lawyer reference. The “ click out of one”
I like your views on guns. Not demonizing the inanimate object or the responsible users of them. And acknowledging they are just a tool.
Even better is how you described bringing the shotgun out just for a bit. You checked and checked again, and your friend checked once it was in his possession. That's gun control right there.
Though the whole 5.56 vs the 7.62 and .45 thing was a bit off. It really depends on what you classify as "power". In terms of hitting a person and going through armor, lighter, faster, more dense rounds are good like specific 5.56 loads. Standard 9mm goes through armor better than .45ACP does because of it's smaller surface area and higher velocity. Unless someone gets AP rounds, .45ACP is a non issue for pretty much any armor.
I’m part Asian, and I don’t park facing forward cuz turning the car around and backing up is too much of an inconvenience especially if the parking garage is narrow.
Yeah, backing out of there is also an inconvenience….
It's a double edged sword
wow you two really LOVE the sound of your own voices huh?! It's so annoying how much I have to hit the fast forward button to get back to the ACTUAL REACTION!!
Ayy awesome!
So what you are saying is that: You appropriated Asian backwards parking culture. :O
I'll start working on my apology video.
Wait, Tim Cook is on CNN!? 😳
He's the main guy who tells the traffic and news report on the radio station I listen to in the car, I never knew he was on an actually need channel...
RUclips doesn't want me to be threatening...
$200 to blast some shit? SIGN ME THE FUCK UP...I won't do that to the cows though I prefer my steak medium
Can you guys please tell us what Nick said? It's been four months and we still don't know. Please🥺😭.
34:15 I pooped a few spiral shaped turds in my life.
The real reason Russia declared war on Ukraine 45:54 - 46:26
The sword in the stone is caliburne and not Excalibur
what was the intro song?
Speaking of foot weapons, League Of Legends literally has a cyborg character with giant pocket knives for legs.
cool!
League is still shit tho
@@jaffy9939 Yeah, said character has a lot of design flaws though. And yeah, LOL has a lot of problems.
Internet Historian is Aussie BTW, not English and s we dont' have Bread Sauce... I dunno if IH would know what your talkin about, LoL.
Didn't tag Ordinary Things, sad times
I don’t think they ever tag the second person in the video. I haven’t seen them tag Sumito Media, Many Kudos, or Pyrocynical before.
I was just wondering if you guys would stop the vid before that fakeout ending. Imagine the comments section.
WAPPIN STICK!
What if all of greek mythology was just their equivalent of memes... and the trident is for fisherman was an earlier meme so someone made it into a new meme where the god of the sea holds one!
I mean these days it's written as they were actually believed to be gods but if not for the age of science wouldn't super saiyan shaggy and his legend would grow and we'd call it mythology in the distant future
and people would look back thinking we believed in a god called shaggy xD... ya see my point we don't know they may of just been a practical joke there were philosophers back then with the mind to think about the future so why not pranks on future civilisations!
Lmao 22? No way
700 nitro express lol
Dam bro hpa ar I hope it is used well that’s great
Hey I have that plague doctor plushie as well
Haha check out the Breton I have couple come tried to kenurk
47:33 he doesn't know what he is talking about. he didn't say what grenade he was talking about. because in the military nothing happens intel you throw it and the handle is released in the process. the handle being released is what starts the process. good idea to say nothing if you don't know everything about something. what you said about the car running one over could happen
I'm with IH on breakfast. It sucks. Good bacon is pretty fire though.
I bet he asked to mute the microphones because he needed to fart. 🤣
Give Nate a chance to act like he knows what he’s talking about a little bit more
I have the same big black knife!
Wait nevermind...
5 second clip, pause for 15 minutes, 5 second clip. Get on with it.
12:41 It's annoying when people think that being pro-gun-control being such a anti-gun. Like guns, we do need them - especially if you live somewhere out in the country we're helping less likely to get to you. But imo you don't need an automatic rifle in a densely populated urban area unless you plan to kill bystanders, and the only reason you would need a silencer in an urban population is if you want to be a gas station sniper.
Gun should have the minimal amount of testing and control that you need in order to drive a car, even moreso you need to be psychologically evaluated to make sure that you're not prone to shoot up a school anytime soon. Teenagers should not be able to get their hands on a gun easily.
Different states should have different regulations on what can and cannot be allowed, but naturally there should be a standardized bar that you need to have in order to get your hands on a weapon that is only meant to take a life.
Edit: spelling and S-T-T fuck ups
This is a comment.
This is a reply
This is also a reply
Is this a reply?
This is a reply
@@sin-jay733 Maybe it's a reply
Jesus, I know it's a reaction video but I didn't expect Nate to give us a lecture every two minutes.
@RCTaliesin I have nothing against their discussions, its what I like about their reactions, but if I had to guess why they had longer ones here I'd say probably because of the topic of the video being something that Nate has strong feelings about.
I live in the UK so I've not really got much to say on the topic of guns, but I imagine I'd feel different if I were in Nate's position.
I looked for the video, saw it was more than an hour long y bailed out inmediately, they talk waaaay to much in the middle of the video.
Oh my god you whiny manbabies, A lot of the reasons they have to pause under fair use they have to make it transformative so they have to talk and pause but I guess your pea brains can’t get that
@@REDIVY78 Yeah they usually do that but not to this extent. Look at their other In The Field reactions, not a single one is even close to an hour long.
.
I remember there was a guy who sent a car in space and people were saying how sexist his shirt is, even though it was made by a woman XD
👍👍
I don't believe that's a kukri. Not a traditional one anyway
Lol I can see why you aren't that popular now
Lol sorry if I don't fuckin know what's happening 🙈🙉🙊 🤟💩
I can’t watch these reactions anymore I find you guys pause way too often to the point that you ruin the flow of the video your watching.
Then watch the original video. These aren’t those “reactors” that watch the video through to steal content and don’t add anything
@@sirboomsalot4902 difference between saying nothing and interrupting a video taking away from the impact of what's being said. That's why reactors should rewind the video by 5 seconds after a pause in my opinion
@@trocoplaytv1254 I agree my issue with them was stopping what feels like every minute or so ruining the flow and impact of what was happening in the video. You don’t need to react to every statement said but rather the each topic as a whole it’s a balance.
unsubbed for poor trigger discipline lmao
......jim jefferies - gun control
jim jefferies is a tool
@@RenegadesReact yeah but thats why its funny ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@RenegadesReact great vid btw
@@RenegadesReact Elon musk too LLLLLLLLL
@@nonautemrexchristus5637 True. But, Elon Musk gave us affordable Electric Cars, High Speed Satellite Internet, and a frickin flamethrower just for fun. What has Jim Jeffries done in comparison?
.