Vertigo is my favorite movie of all time. The way Hitchcock weaves a sense of obsession, neurosis, and confusion into every aspect of the film from the music, to the cinematography, to the production design. It is the only film I have watched that made me feel the exact themes it is presents and experience the same emotional roller coaster Scotty is throughout the film.
Bernard Herrmann was (to me) the greatest film score composer. He really could get at the psychology/essence of the film and translate it to music like no other. In "Vertigo"'s opening credits, one beautiful little detail I would like to point out. We first hear the 'hypnotic'/cycling ostinato (repeating pattern) of the strings/harp, and then also the menacing, piercing lines of the brass. When Herrmann returns to these later on [where at the top of the credits it reads "Art Direction - Hal Periera"], he does a neat thing, which I think subconsciously reinforces an off-kilter feeling to the listener: he speeds-up/doubles the ostinato harp line, while at the same time protracting out/slowing-down the brass line. Musically, I think it is a terrific complement to Hitchcock's famous dolly zoom shot...
I think there is a difference between people who go in blind and see it the first time as an adult vs people who have grown up with it. The twist is just so freaking shocking...
My mom took me to see this movie when it first came out at the theaters in Atlanta. We live just down the street from the theater and I sat by myself in the movie theater at 12 years of age, mesmerized. I don't know why I was so mesmerized unless it was the camera work and the music and the colors. Maybe it was because eventually I would become an art major and end up teaching art and now it's 77 years of age I'm continuing to do art and love music and movies. Especially Hitchcock movies!
Thanks for another excellent review - this time Hitchcock's Vertigo. I have to say that Vertigo is my favourite Hitchcock movie along with Rear Window, but I understand your misgivings due to the sheer depressing darkness of the subject matter. Every time I view the film, I sit there in wonder at every aspect of the movie - the story, the characters, the cinematography, set designs, evocative use of colour, Herrmann's passionate and moody score and the brilliant use of location shooting in San Francisco. Thanks again and please keep the reviews of these classics coming.
For me, "Vertigo" is one of the greatest thriller movie in the history. In my humble opinion, is one of the five best productions in the Hitchcock catalogue. James Stewart has one of the greatest performances in all his long career, and Kim Novak bring a fantastic variation between the two characters she had to be. The Bernard Hermann's musical score is a essential part inside the production. Congratulations, for your very good review!
This is an outstanding, highly intelligent review that "gets" so many things about this complex film that most "first-time-watching" reactors miss completely. I think it's quite normal to have mixed feelings about Vertigo; and indeed, for most viewers, those feelings likely will change with each successive viewing. There are so many elements to admire in the filmmaking: the imagery, the use of color, costume, sets and settings; the performances of the principal actors, among many other things. And of course Bernard Hermann's astonishing score. It's an easy film to admire and perhaps love, but, by Hitchcock's design, it's a highly unsettling film, and it isn't, for me, an easy film to like. It conjures complex emotions that preclude mere likeability.
A couple of summers ago I went to the actual Mission that Vertigo was filmed at. It looks exactly the same now as it did in the film. It was a cool experience to be there. I hate to pick a favorite Hitchcock but this one is close to the top of my list. Also, I don't think I would have liked it as much if Kim Novak wasn't in the movie. She is so attractive and she draws you into the film. Thanks for the review.
Book Pal Agreed about Kim’s presence. No offense to Vera Miles, but it wouldnt have been as compelling, not only because of Kim’s beauty but also her ability to express vulnerability.
I have never heard anybody speak of this. In the scene in the barn Scotie is talking to Judy. She is facing outside looking over his shoulder at something. For a second we see it too. Its Elster pulling up in his car with dead wife. This is Judy's signal to go up tower. Took me 2 views of movie to see it. WOW ! Love Hitchcock.
I love this film, and I feel that your review of it was very fair, it's a complex and in many ways a disturbing tale, quite definitely of obsession, not just on James Stewart's character either, but just about all of the characters, the husband about wanting rid of his wife and the story that goes along with it, Mitch's with man that she wants but can't be with because of herself, as she was the one who called off their marriage, Judy who wants the man who she met in a lie, a person who only see the character she portrayed and not the real her, all the people in this are driven by one obsession or another, and I think this is why in the end they all lose.
The actors Jimmy Stewart and Kim Novak had real personal chemistry with each other in the 2 movies they did together in 1958, and I believe that it shows on camera. Kim Novak talked in an interview about “probably the most honest, beautiful time of an animal instinct I’ve known” in reference to her feelings toward Stewart when she was with him on set in Bell, Book and Candle.
Excellent review. This is top 3 movies of all time, for me. There's not just one plot-twist in Vertigo, there's a few, and weaved like The Symposium . Hitchcock said it was his masterpiece. Must've been frustrating for him that it flopped in '58.
Enjoyed your review, and as the Bernard Herrmann score is a favorite of mine, I had it playing in the background while watching the review. VERTIGO, I think, has become my favorite Hitchcock movie. It was stuck in the vault for a large portion of my life, but once I got to see it sometime in the 80s, I began to realize how special it was. Today, in the days of high definition and Blu-rays, the film gets even better as the colors become so vibrant and so important to the plot. Who can think of Madeline and not think of the color green?
I think this is really a movie which, by means of an extreme premise, deconstructs romantic notions associated with "love" while exposing the manipulative and self-centred agenda that often accompanies such. Scotty is effectively "in love" with a woman who doesn't exist. Maddy is an ethereal, fantasy creature who really only lives in his imagination. His projection of this fantasy onto Judy reveals the utterly self-gratifying nature of this "love". He has no real interest in Judy as a person in her own right but only in what he can mold her into. Scotty is an emotionally immature character. He is still, as a middle-aged man, a bachelor. Regarding Midge he has an association with a woman that he clearly has a rapport with and who obviously harbour's genuine love for him. She would most likely make a very good companion for Scotty, given the chance. Instead, he chooses to chase a dream, a fantasy, apparently happier to pursue an image rather than an adult relationship. I like to think that this movie is about the main character's journey from out of his childish notions of love into a kind of emotional manhood. Through a "trial by fire" he overcomes his vertigo which is perhaps a metaphor for *fill in the blank* and if a sequel were to be made, we'd find him happily married and content with Midge, occasionally reflecting on the entanglement that nearly ruined him but from which he emerged wiser and stronger. No, it's not Hitchcock's best film, in my view. While *The Lady Vanishes* lives, how could it be? 😁 Yet it is a very thought-provoking piece that definitely repays repeat viewings. I love the photography also, which lends an almost otherworldly air to the locations. Of particular note is the apartment scene with Maddy bathed in a green glow making her appear ghost-like and unattainable (as indeed she is). Anyway, a very good picture and way better than *Citizen Kane* for sure. Apologies if you're a *Kane* fan 🙂 Thanks for the review 👍
He's being taken in by a deceptive illusion, made more believable by Judy/Madeleine's real feelings for him. Scotty is vulnerable because of trauma, and the "vertigo" one gets from sailing to the heights of emotion renders him incapable of understanding what is happening until it is too late. Calling Scotty "immature" doesn't really fit, except in the sense that he does not have cynicism about women that is taken for granted in today's main leads. Vertigo is about psychology, and it is about how a certain vulnerability, a combination of physical and mental injury, leads to a vulnerability to severe delusion. The end of his police career made him vulnerable to the delusion about Madeleine being real, the death of Madeleine at the tower made him a psychological wreck. When he is out of the hospital, recovers from the catatonia (I guess that was the result of his immaturity, eh?) he is possessed by a mad compulsion to try to find Madeleine, so when the incredible happens and he meets her doppelganger, he has simply become wholly detached from reality. Vertigo is about a certain type of psychological disability, injury, weakness, being aggravated to the point that it leads to madness. One can say his ideas of romantic love are deluded, but by that point he is basically on autopilot (having nothing else to live for) until the appearance of Carlotta's jewelry snaps him out of it.
@@2ndavenuesw481 I think it's important to remember that Scottie is, by training and profession, both a detective and a lawyer, and those instincts kick back in when he sees the necklace and starts putting two and two together.
back in film school, our theory professor would teach the freshmen a sort of overview of the history of cinema, and then the next three years were spent on a variety of topics. i took theory classes about the avant-garde, horror and exploitation (we were a stone's throw from 42nd st. and NYC) the silent era, westerns, and about hitchcock. i loved my teacher, he was a truly brilliant little man with an incredibly broad pool of knowledge and a rather eclectic sensibility. he was also a very hard a, and i'm still proud of my marks. as long as you could argue your point and back it up, flights of fancy could be welcome. anyhow, we'd just watched vertigo, and he was discussing the film with the many students, matriculated and not, who filled the auditorium. his classes were legendary, and even sciences and humanities students would sit in, spilling out onto the stairs and in the aisles. i had just watched this movie, again, and we had been talking about the dead and possession and obsession, and whether or not judy had ever truly existed for scottie. he was pacing back and forth, and he asked us who it was that emerges from the darkness of the bell tower to precipitate the final moments of the film. there were a lot of answers, all of which were unsatisfactory to him. i wasn't very brave in class, but finally squeaked out "in that moment--the nun, she's not a nun. she's a ghost. she's madeleine's ghost" which elicited a great aha! lots of clapping, and a new discussion about revenge. i was red faced, but so pleased. it's one of my favorite memories of that class and that professor. i was just so excited to be on the same wavelength as someone whose thoughts i respected so much.
Just discovered your wonderful insightful channel. This is my favorite Hitchcock. It's hypnotic with a superb score and fantastic visuals. It has been a favorite since I first saw it on TV after it was released from the vaults. Last year I saw it for the first time on a big screen. Wow! Jimmy Stewart's greatest performance only he could go that dark for Hitchcock. Can you imagine Cary Grant in this? This i think is the reason it flopped originally. He makes you squirm. Nobody wanted to see that. And I believe the gods had a hand in insuring that Kim Novak was cast instead of Vera Miles. This is her greatest performance. She and Jimmy have great chemistry. I love them together in Bell, Book, and Candle as well. Maybe that's why I've never been conscious of an age difference. I remember reviewers saying the plot reveal was a mistake and happened too early. It took a couple of viewings before I realized how wrong they were. The final portion of the movie would have no impact at all. I love this disturbing tragic love story. I can think of no other movie like it. It is in a class by itself. My wife, on the other hand, just doesn't get it. Her favorite Hitchcock is Psycho. Not a bad choice, just not mine. Maybe it's just me but I think the wrong person fell at the end.
Part of the genius of this piece is that it doesn't matter what you or I WANT to happen -- sad ending -- happy ending --- it's just.... an ending... a series of events that has led to this final moment that resolves all the conflict of the the earlier part of the film... The film (Hitchcock) is indifferent to our needs... as is the Universe: sometimes things turn out the way we wish them to; sometimes, they don't and sometimes we are at a loss to understand the denouement. We sit in awe of Fate, with, perhaps a feeling of privilege that we were given a glimpse into these extraordinary events. Perhaps, as Shakespeare said, "it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing..."
Psycho is probably my favorite film but Vertigo is incredible as well... I can see how some call this the greatest film... But the same can be said of Rear Window... I love Stewart’s obsessive portrayal in Vertigo... I personally think it worked out.
Good review JW. It does make my top 25 Hitchcock movies. But it drags too much for me to really love it. I get that it has its greatness. It has its moments of excitement, but the lulls in between those moments don't keep me riveted. And a Hitchcock suspense thriller should keep me riveted. I will say I like it more than Citizen Caine, but I've never seen Caine as as great as others see it. I get that it's influential, but the story bores me to tears. And since I see movies as a storytelling medium, I can't rank it highly at all. Im glad to be making my way slowly through your back catalog. It's been fun, and your movie reviews are wonderful.
“At moments throughout, Vertigo’s images shimmer with an incandescent beauty that few films in history could pretend to match, even as other moments- awkwardnesses in the script, longueurs in the storytelling-induce discomforts not originally intended by the director or his crew. Vertigo is not the perfect, pure cinema of Rear Window. Yet who is haunted, dogged, pursued by Rear Window?” Dan Auiler
Thanks for your work. On the blu-ray, they give an alternate ending which was filmed at the request of the censorship board. Also, in the original story, you don't find out until near the end that Judy and Madeleine are the same person. Hitchcock reveals this halfway through the film, which makes it more interesting. Cheers.
Thank you for this really fair review! I did notice Vertigo’s omission from your Hitchcock series and am very glad to see this. Vertigo, Shadow of a Doubt, and To Catch a Thief are probably my favourites, even though they couldn’t be more different. I think the distinction you draw between admiring a movie and enjoying it is apt. I feel the same way about Sophie’s Choice. I think the ending is the only logical resolution to this movie. The first time I watched it, I found it perplexing (and abrupt). But the more I think of it: Julie had completely self-abnegated in order to be with Scottie, and Scottie rejected her (“Too late, too late...”); what else was there left for her? I think the age difference between Stewart and Novak is also purposeful. It adds to the perversity and toxicity of their relationship.
Hey Jerome, i started watching hitchcock movies after going thru your videos and i fell in love with them. I watch them one by one and last week i watched North by Northwest and it's my top fav now, it was like a james bond film before james bond. Coming to vertigo, it's a good movie. I felt movie was a lil slow in the first half, the end was a bit abrupt too 😅. Also i do have to say, if i was born in that era i wud be impressed, but since many of the things in the movie has now become cliches, it kind of didn't feel something that is the best of alfred Hitchcock. North by Northwest, rear window and dial M for murder are my personal favorites. Surprisingly, most Hitchcock movies stand test of time. I have watched many interviews of hitchcock n he is now one of my fav directors too ✌️ Love your videos, and i think you're beautiful.
Kim Novak's performance is utterly brilliant. At first she comes off incredibly over the top, but as you come to find out later (SPOILERS) that's entirely the point!! When she plays a "real" character, it's a great contrast, and she is brilliant at portraying a woman reluctantly transforming herself into someone she's not, because she's so desperate for affection. In a way, her character is almost as obsessed and desperate as Scottie. More tragic, even.
After watching Vertigo many many times n from your analysis of the film, Hitchcock intended to purposely keep the viewing audience off-balance through out the film. That's the feeling I have even after watching it numerous times. Thanks for your film analysis. Looking forward to your next one.
For the 2nd week in a row I am glad you weren't yet able to review the Godzilla movie, because look what you did instead: you dared to review one of the most reviewed and discussed movies of all time! And a damn fine job you did too! You Jerome should never ever feel intimidated to review a film such as this - I've seen you tackle other great classic films and you always do an excellent job displaying insight and pointing out details that I may have missed. As for my feelings on Vertigo, I'm pretty much on point with you - It is a great film by any yardstick but I can think of a good few Hitch films which I have enjoyed more, I do think that this was Stewart's most interesting role and perhaps the best performance of his career. Anyway, once again, awesome review Jerome!
I first saw this movie in the early eighties, in a movie theater that just played old movies. It was great. I also saw more Hitchcock movies in that theater. Although I don't like the ending, it's a wonderful film.
I recently read the novel "Vertigo" is based on. The first part is almost identical to the movie. The main difference is that it is set in Paris in the spring of 1940 when the Germans were fast approaching the gates of Paris. The feeling of impending doom gives the whole story an air of urgency and irreality, which nicely matches the bizarre plot and makes the Scottie character's gullibility believable. After Madeleine appears to fall to her death, the protagonist escapes to North Africa, returning to France shortly after the liberation (but before the end of the war). Here (+SPOILER ALERT+) the story deviates a little from the movie, and the ending - while essentially the same - is extremely brutal. Let's put it this way - fake Madeleine doesn't fall from a bell tower this time... The Scottie character differs somewhat in the fact that he's no Jimmy Stewart. An alcoholic since his traumatic experience as a policeman, he's a generally unpleasant character and it's hard to root for him. But it's a decent novel and well worth reading!!
Thanks. Very comprehensive overview, as per usual from you, knowing how much to detail to hit on and what to stay away from for the sake of new viewers of older films like this. I first saw VERTIGO at the drive in with my parents! Not idea way to see a VistaVision film. I always remembered the zoom-in/pull back effect which was used so effectively to suggest falling/not-falling, an effect used so often since VERTIGO's release (most notably in that beach scene in JAWS). I understand this film's rise to the top of "best of" status, though I feel that that first place kind of honor (to me) is better given over to films (like CITIZEN KANE) that deal with bigger, more universal themes than personal stories (of course, personal stories can also convey big, universally-applicable themes). I'm just saying that I prefer a film that can tell both a personal story and one with multiple layers of thematic substance on all kinds of levels, and I feel KANE and films like it tend to do that. In fact, a lot of the controversy about "best films" voted by the Academy has been the questioning of why certain less popular films have won out so often over extremely popular movies. I understand that very clearly, as the Oscar is not, in theory (as well as often in practice) not a popularity context, but an effort to acknowledge a film that aspires to the widest range of themes, that are aimed beyond only entertainment (not that that the choices over the decades are beyond question either). I tend to agree with what was the original philosophy of the Academy, which, after all, was meant for acknowledgement among peers---an "insiders' award, so to speak---rather than popularity. Yes, it still turned out that many films of highest quality have lost out to far more successful, popular movies, but i still support the principle. Anyway, I SUPER digress into an area that makes a lot of people's blood boil, so...er, guess I should just get back to the subject at hand. VERTIGO. An amazingly inventive film that certainly overlaps into a variety of "types" as you say---crime, ghostly, thriller, romance....Again, thanks for the posting!
Great review. Thank you very much. When I'm in the right mood, Vertigo may be the best movie ever made. But it isn't the easiest of Hitch's stuff. It lacks his humor, adventure and it has a slow, dreamish pace. Rear Window,, Shadow of a Doubt, Psycho, The 39 Steps are all easier to watch for some "fun" Hitch. But, as I said, when I am ready for something more serious. Wow. Novak (in essentially if not literally a double role) and Stewart give the best performances of their careers. And the last 1/3 is mesmerizing. Judy maybe an accomplice to murder, but we feel for her. For me, the ending is perfect. I can't think of a more powerful image and they cut away. Awesome.
Your conviction about not giving away the plot is very commendable. You always handle that so thoughtfully. This is my favorite movie. I have watched it annually since 2007, and I had seen it several times before that. For me the best movies are all about how they make me feel, and 'Vertigo' really packs a punch, even after so many viewings. I feel that a really good movie can be experienced as a piece of music. Would listening to Beethoven's 9th once a year be too much? I don't think so. It's hard to describe how 'Vertigo' makes me feel. I really empathize with Scotty Ferguson. But I can see why others might be uncomfortable in places, especially women. The implausibility of the story has never bothered me, but I do wonder about one particular moment: When Judy opens her door to find Scotty standing there. How could she not be startled or react even a tiny bit?
Good point. I've often scrutinized her face in that moment, trying to detect some barely visible sign that betrays her reaction. I never catch one, though.
Hitchcock has left the audience confusing and still wondering if this is really the same woman. If Judy showed any expression seeing Scottie at the door the audience would know right away. Its not up to her to give the big twist plot away at that moment, not just yet. Hence why she has to act like Scottie was a completely stranger to her.
Midge's fatal flaw is her obsession with Scottie, but she sits on the border of obsession and loyalty; it's relatively grey because loyalty and obsession are treated hand in hand to no benefit to her or Scottie, who she seems to care a lot about. I love the range of Kim Novak on display in Vertigo... Scottie isn't interested in Judy, he's interested in the idea of a person she could be.
It's definitely one of the all time great movies. So great that you don't even stop to think how preposterous the whole wife murder scheme is. How can anyone plan and execute such an elaborate scheme and succeed? Find someone to impersonate your wife. Seduce a detective to the point of obsession so he chases you to the top of a bell tower just in time to throw your murdered wife off the tower. And doing this hoping that his vertigo would keep him from reaching the top of the tower in time. Preposterous scheme, but we're caught up in Scotties obsession so much that we're not bothered by these prosiac details.
I agree with your review (btw, don't read this if you don't want spoilers). I think it's a great movie but it's not my favorite Hitchcock film. I don't mind the parts that are creepy and upsetting, I think you got it right, that's what Hitchcock wanted and that's what being obsessed with someone is like (talking from personal experience unfortunately). What always bothered me was the ending. It just seems so abrupt and also kind of unfair. She was an accomplice to the guy murdering his wife but we don't know that she knew that. She just took a job and got sucked into something much more complex and sinister than she ever imagined. It seems like such an easy way out when suddenly "she's dead now". I've often wondered if the ending was partly due to the movie code that was just starting to go away but I think was still in force for this film. Where a criminal couldn't be seen getting away with their crime. Whatever the reason I find the ending very unsatisfying. I think Psycho is Hitchcock's masterpiece. Everything about that film is perfect and it is such a shift from conventional mysteries where we start with someone who seems to be the protagonist only... to have her be out of the picture. I also like Rear Window and North by Northwest more. Those two are the two I never get tired of rewatching because of the excellent way they integrate humor and mystery/tension. BTW, anyone who likes Vertigo should check out Body Double by Brian DePalma. It's a big nod to Vertigo as well as Rear Window and IMO a really amazing film. That one also had an ending I found unsatisfying the first time but after multiple viewings it makes sense.
I admit to watching Vertigo multiple times, hoping against hope that I'll feel differently about it. I never do. It strikes me as a very cold and abstract film. A great exploration of dark themes that never leads to a catharsis. I'll keep watching it though, and that confirms it's allure.
You are allowed to like - or dislike - any movie you want.... everyone has different tastes... that's why there are more flavors of ice cream than just Vanilla.... :D
Yes, Midge was a unique character in a Hitchcock film. Once saw an interview with Hitchcock where he said, "The audience should suffer as much as possible."
Kim Novak is amazingly beautiful. Jimmy is a little older in his love affair with Novak, but it's okay for me. Jimmy is a lucky man. The movie had no ups and downs in the first half and was sometimes boring. But after Madeleine fell from the tower and died, the movie became very thrilling and mysterious. I was really surprised when Judy proved to be Madeleine and the crimes she was involved in were revealed. Hitchcock's first choice for Madeline was not Novak. This was a very interesting behind-the-scenes story, but I think Novak was a perfect fit for that role. Finally, a nun suddenly emerged from the darkness, Madeline mistook the nun for a ghost (?), and she fell from the tower in horror (and perhaps she died). I was worried that Scottie would follow her and throw himself out of the tower. Personally, I prefer Rear Window and Psycho, but Vertigo is a movie worth seeing.
Stewart's and Novak's age difference isn't so hard to swallow when you realize that Madeline is married to one of Scotty's old college buddies, Gavin Elster. She apparently goes for older men. Then, when Madeline becomes a rich widow, Uncle Charlie will murder her, not realizing that she's spending her own fortune and not her late husband's.
You and your followers may enjoy thinking about this question, which I think may have been raised a few years ago by a reviewer. It concerns a scene that could have been left out of the movie. After Scottie has found Judy and talked to her in her room, she thinks through her options which admit to us that she was an accomplice to a murder. So from then on, we're effectively waiting to see if she can carry off a dreadful secret. If we weren't shown her inner dialogue, would it have helped or hindered the movie?
I might have actually seen the reviewer you're referring to discuss this question. If I did, hopefully I don't just end up repeating something I heard someone else say. It certainly would have been an interesting change. Without her confirmation that she and Madeleine were, in fact, the same person, the next part of the film would have been more of a mystery--how is this girl so similar, is she a ghost, is she actually the same person? But Judy giving us that information lets us in on the secret; we know something our main character doesn't know, so then we're waiting for him to figure it out too and bracing for his inevitable bad reaction. Thus you've got the suspense that Hitchcock was most known for. I couldn't say if the movie would be better or worse without that scene, but I bet Hitchcock wouldn't have wanted to go in that direction. He almost always opted for suspense over mystery. I also think it would change the emotions in the climactic scene. As is, we've been clued in for a while, gotten a little used to the idea, and watched Judy squirm with the discomfort of the lie. We've had enough time and insight to take pity on her and view her sympathetically, so we feel sorry for her when he's accusing her and treating her roughly. If we'd found out what she did at the same time Scottie did, our vicarious sense of outrage and betrayal would be fresher and more intense. Possibly we might have been rooting for Scottie to get revenge, maybe even to kill her. That would have completely changed the tragic mood of their final moments together. I might have even made if feel like more of a film noir. Anyway, that's my view. Personally, I like the movie fine the way it is, and I admit it's hard for me to imagine it any other way. I couldn't say if it would have been better or worse without that scene. It would have been different, though.
@@Weiselberry Great reply- I feel the same indecision. Occurred to me recently that eliminating it would have been riskier, since our disbelief would have been stretched a little further, but besides the great job Novak did of creating a different person, Hitchcock would have something else going for him- we are acquainted with the occasional practice of using the same actor to play entirely different people. So I think he might have gotten away with it, and your ideas about the final scene would all be correct.
I just discovered your reviews. I'm looking forward to my favorite Hitchcock, Notorious. I also hope that you review Noel Coward's In Which We Serve & The Archers' A Matter of Life and Death. I greatly appreciate the effort you must expend to produce your reviews.
Thank you! I've seen In Which We Serve (really liked it), but I think it was just before I started doing my monthly mini reviews, so I never talked about it. A Matter of Life and Death, on the other hand, I did discuss in a mini review here: ruclips.net/video/VOLcqbHSc8U/видео.html.
This is the first video of your channel that I have watched. It was excellent! Your reviewing skills are top notch! Me thinks I should check out your other videos too!
Another terrific review, I've seen Vertigo quite a lot but was fortunate enough to see it recently again but on the big screen for the first time, seeing the nightmare scene on such a large screen was pretty incredible. Your feelings on the character Midge are very interesting, I have never read a review where her character was given as much empathy and attention as you've shown her, she absolutely deserves it, I've always felt bad for her, but!...she has a great apartment :) strangely whenever I think of Hitchcock I think of apartments, homes in general. Midges great apartment in Vertigo with a fantastic view, the guys apartment in Rope, another great view, James Masons characters house right next to Mount Rushmore in North by Northwest, and probably my favourite film set ever, Stewart's apartment along with all the other apartments surrounding it in Rear Window, I think I could live there even with a murderer living across from me lol. I also love the Library and the little town from Shadow of a Doubt, my favourite Hitchcock film. I do like Vertigo a lot but it's behind other Hitchcock films for me, it would be in my top five though, it can be an awkward watch at times for the very reasons you've mentioned. Where some think bloody shower scenes when Hitchcock's name comes up others think brown suits and apartments lol. ~ thank you Ms Weiselberry ~
In my late teens/early twenties I considered Vertigo my favourite Hitchcock film, but as I get older it slips further and further back to the point where now I wouldn't even rate it in my top ten. Partly because I've seen more now, and partly because my tastes have changed a little over the years. It's probably even third place in the Stewart/Hitchcock collaboration rankings for me now.
That's an interesting trajectory, sort of the opposite of my own in the sense that I've come to appreciate and understand the movie more as I get older. I don't gain affection for it, though, so it doesn't claim a spot on my top ten list either.
SPOILER ALERT!!!!! Sometimes I like to imagine that Scottie realized that Judy actually was Madeleine the moment he first (?) saw her. That instead of using Judy as a prop for his obsession with Madeleine, he deliberately tortures her to get even with what she did to him. Even without taking things to this extreme, there's the question of when Scottie first figures it out. I've lived in the San Francisco Bay Area my whole life, so one of my pleasures in watching Vertigo is all the location shots. These make all those scenes of Scottie driving around the city more interesting to me than they might be to most people. As for whether Vertigo is the best movie of all time: I think it's kind of silly to take creative works like movies, music, painting, etc. and treat them like sports teams with winners and losers, where only one gets to win the championship. Just about everyone agrees that Vertigo is a great film. What does it serve to hold it up next to another great film like Citizen Kane to try to figure out which is better?
I agree, with you, not Hitchcock's best. I would take Rear Window, Psycho, and Strangers on a Train, and maybe a couple of others over it. But very good for sure, and I appreciate your thoughts about it.
Vertigo is a superb dream-like meditation on the human emotion of obsession, and I do think that it is a very high-level Hitchcock film. It’s wonderful to watch on blu-ray with a very good TV and speakers. But it starts to get a bit over-rated when it is ranked as the greatest film of all-time or that it is above Hitchcock’s other excellent films. I think that it is on the same high level as films like Rear Window, North by Northwest, Notorious, The Lady Vanishes, Rebecca, Psycho, etc. Personally, my 2 favorite Hitchcock films are The Lady Vanishes and Notorious, but I would not argue with anyone who prefers Vertigo as their favorite. It’s great for what it sets out to achieve.
Vertigo is my favourite film of all time, Rear Window is fairly high up too, at least top 5 up with Silence of the Lambs, Chasing Amy, and Casablanca (Casablanca is weird film for me, throwing out a water of Vichy water and kicking it over, and the singing of a song to combat the Nazi's singing in the bar were the most powerful scenes for me). Sunset Boulevard, American Beauty, Goodfellas, Gandhi, and Hereditary round out my top 10. From Hitchcock, I also really like Rebecca, Dial M for Murder, Spellbound, and Notorious. But I also really like a bunch of other films as well: North by Northwest, Psycho, Strangers on a Train, Rope, and so on... I almost feel like you can't go wrong with Hitchcock. Even Family Plot, which I think is considered his worst.
This film recently overtook Citizen Kane as number one in Sight and Sound's influential poll of the best films ever made. Personally, I don't like these best of beauty contests since they are inherently absurd. Beauty is ultimately in the socialised eye of the beholder and no one, no one, has ever seen every film made. That said, this is to me a great film.
If Vertigo hadn't been restored and favored by Scorsese it wouldn't be #1. If Citizen Kane hadn't had a political context in which Hearst blackballed Orson Welles then it would never have been #1. However, everyone has favorites. It isn't taking away from great movies that they are not a favorite. Vertigo being a favorite movie of so many film fans is not surprising, really. In the future, it will be harder to rely on lists of favorites because the political aspect is coming into the fore again.
This is my very favorite Hitchcock. The first time I saw it the whole second part surprised me, and Novack is so good it took me a while to figure out she really was the same person. His obsession with her is very disturbing - yet he is still a detective and somehow cuts through all of that to the truth, and in spite of her ignorance of what was intended in the murder plot, I don't think a happy ending would have been possible. I enjoy your Hitchcock reviews, so thanks for this. I was wondering when you'd get to it. By the way, I left a comment on your Psycho review sometime in the past year, which you probably haven't seen, so you can look if you're interested.
yes - the movie is squirm-worthy for Scotty's obsession - like psycho is psychopathic - read window is voyeuristic - each person reacts differently to each and every movie theme - nothing wrong with that - - this was a very good analysis of the film
When my kids hit puberty, I'm going to sit them down and have them watch this film. Then I'm going to tell them to find themselves a good Midge, and don't go chasing after Madelines. Also, don't be a Judy -- if who you truly are isn't enough for a romantic partner, they're not worth it.
Certainly not "Best Film of All - Time," but a Hitchcock masterpiece. Stewart's acting is brilliant, particularly in that final scene going up the stairs.... you know.... brilliant.
Great movie, but i think my favorite Hitchcock is a toss up between Notorious and North by Northwest, maybe because they both have happy endings. You mentioned obsession here, which massage me think of Brian De Palma's movie Obsession from 1976. De Palma always paid Homage (or maybe just copied) Hitchcock, but Obsession copies Vertigo in its theme and mood.
I love the Midge character, and think it's a shame that we never find out what happens with her. It would be super cool if someone made a spinoff sometime that follows her as the lead and explores her life.
For me, I like to imagine that the reason Midge and Scotty never wound up together is because Midge knew deep down just how messed up he was, and rejected him as a real romantic possibility, but still loved him and enjoyed his company despite knowing that he was a creepy weirdo.
Maywither Dragon That’s horrible, ha ha! What an awful thing to imagine. Jimmy Stewart is awesome, he just got bewitched by a beautiful woman in distress.
This is a movie that I never really quite understood. That being said, these women that review these movies have given me some hope that society isn't completely dumbed down almost to the earth's core. Thanks.
I sensed you might’ve been holding back but I’m always open with people that Vertigo doesn’t even crack my top 10 for Hitchcock. I rarely give “overhyped” as a reason I didn’t care for a film because I strive to judge a movie based on what it is rather than what I wanted it to be, and I’d rather disassociate myself from people who frankly can be rather annoying about movies not meeting their expectations, but Vertigo was one of my most highly anticipated movies of all time so it’s sort of inevitable that I fall prey to this dreaded affliction in such a case. My beef with Vertigo is that the Madeleine ghost story portion just isn’t worth dedicating so much time to. It should’ve been wrapped up far more quickly because the film really only gets steam going when Judy shows up and Scotty attempts to fashion her into what he believes to be his lost love. That portion holds so much intrigue and promise but I can’t help but feel that it’s squandered with that abrupt-to-a-fault ending. It feels forced to me. Compared to the graceful dance present in endings of say, Psycho or Rear Window that completely impress upon you the magic of cinema in an effortless seeming way. Vertigo just makes me think, “Huh....that was clumsy.” But as I said, the moments of greatness, while fleeting, are great. Additionally, any word of praise that is breathed about the score I side with entirely. I’m almost okay with Vertigo being dubbed the greatest just because that haunting score is connected to it. I remember actually thinking the movie would be worth my while because the marriage of the opening credit sequence and music is so spine-chilling. Sadly, I just couldn’t bring myself to feel like that about the majority of what followed. As far as stories of obsessive love are concerned, I’ll take Laura into my corner and be content with that.
Ha, you're kind of right: I didn't overtly state it, but Vertigo doesn't seem to make it into my Hitchcock top 10 either. Oh yes, given a choice between the two, I would definitely choose Laura over Vertigo. Love that movie.
You have so many videos posted!!!!! I have so many questions for you! Not about this video or any of them but how it is possible to have posted this much content!!
I've not seen your Godzilla reviews cuz Godzilla was not a particular favorite of mine. Not even as a kid. So not having seen your reviews I wasn't sure if you'd already made mention of some of its cinematic origins. But I was wondering if you've ever delved a little into the history of stop motion animation and photography. Especially around the turn of the last century . I just saw an interesting RUclips about wladislas starewicz who was a pioneer in the field. If you've not seen it you might wanna check it out. It's short but interesting. Influenced the making of king Kong and Godzilla. I agree with your vertigo review totally.
Hi Jerome, I just discovered your website through this link and look forward to viewing more of your thoughts on Hitchcock, books, and other movies! I like your enthusiasm! Over time, "Vertigo" has become my favorite Hitchcock movie, I think because it is tapping into deeper emotional themes such as trauma, the pain of loss, guilt and resolving these things. Although we think of James Stewart as being the likeable everyman, I find his acting also had this intense/'grimly obsessive' side that could come out in his performances, and "Vertigo" really captures that side really well...I was curious if you've ever seen the interesting movie "Sans Soleil" (1983) by Chris Marker, which weaves an homage to "Vertigo" into its fabric (it's on RUclips, search "Sans Soleil - Insane Memory").
First it helps to be a big fan of Kim Novak who was highly effective playing both ice goddesses & tramps equally well .. I've shown this movie to many people who are spellbound every second of the way until the climax where the rug is totally pulled out from under the audience, there was more filmed originally, after letting us ease out of the film but Hitchcock chose to snip it abruptly, a mistake IMO, to an otherwise perfect movie
Thank you as ever (I don't know why I didn't notice this review before). I have spent the morning watching Vertigo again. I have to be honest, I find it very hard going at times. Is it that James Stewart, truly great actor though he was, just doesn't fit the part somehow; was he indeed too old as Hitchcock went on to suggest when the film was poorly received or is that I just can't 'get a handle' on Scottie's character. The pace of the whole thing seems slow to me and yet the ending is so rushed. As you say, the whole thing pivots on a hardly credible co-incidence. Poor Midge! Yet I have to accept the film is now so hugely regarded and therefore I will defer to those more knowledgeable than I and stay with Rear Window et al. Kind regards
I think the obssession, and flawed Scottie is tough to watch. This is why the movie isn't as popular. The love story finds it hard to rise above it. I'd feel better if Scottie noticed some things that led him to be suspicious of Madeliene/Judy. This is why Rear Window works better with the mystery/voyeur theme. The age difference isn't a big deal. Cary Grant always had lovely younger ladies chasing after him. Just the nice guy Jimmy Stewart is hard to buy as a flawed hero.
Good review. Personally VERTIGO doesn't rank that high on my greatest movies list or even on my list of greatest Hitchcock films. It is memorable, atmospheric beyond measure, visually haunting and I think has one of the best "Holy crap, what just happened!" moments in all of movies not just Hitchcock's. But it's not one I'd watch if I was in the mood for an enjoyable watch or a great Hitchcock movie. I just don’t enjoy it. I feel like great Hitchcock is fun to watch, VERTIGO is a little depressing I guess. I can't really think of any other way of describing how it makes me feel. My personal favorite Hitchcock movie and is, to me at least, the most fun to watch is ROPE. Another fun one is THE TROUBLE WITH HARRY. I need to check if you've reviewed those I'd love to hear what you think of them
I've reviewed Rope, but haven't gotten to The Trouble with Harry. I was actually thinking of doing it recently because it's such a perfect fall movie, but I kind of missed the boat...
@@Weiselberry I hope you do get to review The Trouble With Harry. I'm very interested in your opinion of it. Keep up the great videos, you are consistently one of my RUclips watches I look forward to
Thank you! It's been a long time since I've seen it, but I remember it being one of my favorites when I was younger, for the simple reason that it made me laugh. :)
I think Vertigo, queasy and obsessive, as really unenjoyable as it is, stands yet as Hitchcock's greatest most mature artistic statement. How much more winning and fun are Rear Window and North by Northwest! Yet neither addresses (well Rear Window sort of), the art and pure cinematic style of Vertigo. Is it because of the sad shocking ending? Because the friend is not brought to justice? I think it's because it's just not a good story. I never believed in the central mystery or story like the other two movies; Hitchcock makes his points in the other films and we have fun, enormous fun while he's doing it. Vertigo though, is all about Hitchcock's private obsessions: adulterous feelings, yes, necrophilia!! Is that important for the emergence of a truly great artist? Yes. Is it fun? No!! That's why, perhaps it arouses feelings of admiration though not, perhaps, feelings of love. These are somewhat my own thoughts plus what I've read about Vertigo and Hitchcock. I just remember being a young boy seeing the policeman fall to his death on TV, and then having to go to bed!! And my dad and how much he loved Hitchcock movies. Thanks for your forum and your obvious love and insight and intelligence about cinema.
Thanks for your review. I've always felt Vertigo was one of Hitchcock's most overrated films. And, for some reason, I've never really been a Kim Novak fan. But my mother loved her as an actress! My favorite Hitchcock films are: 1. Rear Window 2. The Birds 3. Lifeboat 4. Rebecca 5. Psycho 6. Shadow of a Doubt 7. Saboteur 8. Spellbound
Another great review! I've seen this movie years ago and though Kim Novak is drop dead gorgeous, the cinematography great, and that climax!!!!! The movie was a bit of a bore for me. I am thinking about seeing it again later on maybe but it wasn't good my first time seeing it :/
Thanks! I know, there's a big section that can feel especially slow. I'd still recommend checking it out again sometime. Maybe knowing where things are going a second time around would make it a little more engaging? :)
Have you considered reviewing Brian de Palma's movies? It seems Hitchcock fans either hate him or love him and I'd be I'd interested in hearing your insightful thoughts.
I reviewed Phantom of the Paradise by request last October (ruclips.net/video/Q50XQxJQ2xE/видео.html ). My thoughts on it were mixed, so I don't know how I'd feel about other De Palma films. I'm familiar with many of his titles, but none of them have ever grabbed me.
I was going to make a comment about the movie, but I can't articulate what I feel about it (very unusual for me). It is a hard movie to grapple with and I think Jerome Weiselberry did a great job in this video.
Ok so ignoring the technical stuff and suchlike all of which you summarised well and swerving any specific spoilers I am happy with identifying with the characters , despite obvious reservations, whilst not sharing your concerns over pace or age differences. However the $64,000 question that you don't quite confront headlong or perhaps can't, understandably, quite decide is how does it it make me feel about about life, the universe and indeed everything. So here's the thing - it makes me miserable. When I think about about things afterwards I actually feel slightly queasy. I think it does the dirt on life (I seem to recall Lawrence coining that one?). So no, I don't think it's Hitch's "best" though it may be one of his most impressive and it's not even a contender for best film of all time. So sue me guys....
"Romey" -- yeah, I'm with you on this one, beautifully made but I don't find anyone in it very sympathetic, particularly Stewart, it gets on my nerves. How far along are you on Hitchcock's movies? Because if you're taking on all of them, I salute you, that takes fortitude. Oh, and you get extra points today for saying "skeedaddle," a verb definitely worth keeping alive just for the fun of it. Looking forward.
As far as the reviews go, this is #21. But I've seen almost all of his suspense films already, many of them multiple times, and a few of his non-suspense movies too. Not sure if I'll review them or not...
I can't recall seeing this one...and the thing is, Jimmy Stewart is probably my favorite actor! Thanks for the spoiler alert. I can't stand when others say things like " Oh it's been so many years, there are no spoilers now...etc..." It's like..um...that's doesn't matter. If some people still haven't seen something, you should always try not to spoiler it. Right? LOL
My film professor said this was the one film where Hitchcock revealed personal things about himself--- his obsession with blondes, his obsessive-compulsive tendency, his controlling personality, and his ability to jerk around an audience and manipulate them into thinking and feeling whatever he wanted. After this film flopped at the box office, he never did it again.
I like Vertigo but it’s not my favorite either. The age difference doesn’t bother me (unlike High Noon). Novak makes me feel creepy. I wonder if it was made in the modern era and there was a bit of skin and a physical relationship between them that it would have made it better. The way it is, the movie almost feels like a dream. Midge is great!
I just discovered your channel and I'm enjoying all your reviews so much. You are very charming, and fun to watch. I'm a big Hitchcock fan myself, have all the movies and books and so forth. I know that some people feel that Vertigo is slow, but to me it has the pace and rhythm of a difficult dream (or nightmare) that one might have. The storyline is not exactly logical either, to say the least, but it definitely has the logic you'd find in a bad dream; things might not add up on the surface, but they fit in perfectly in a deeper, sub-rational way. To me, more than any other movie I've ever seen, Hitchcock captured this dreamlike atmosphere in Vertigo. So I love it for that. However, the one problem I have with the film, and it's the same problem I have with another movie of his that I love, Rear Window, is that, simply, Jimmy Stewart is much too old for the part. I know it's almost a sacrilege to say such a thing, but there it is. His romantic scenes with Kim Novak (and Grace Kelly) have always made me extremely uncomfortable, and I actually can't watch them. He's too old! It always gave me the absolute creeps. He was also too old for the part in Rope, but that's another story. So for me, the casting of Jimmy Stewart undermines these otherwise wonderful films. More than this, I never saw what other people saw in Jimmy Stewart the actor. I know that he was much beloved and respected, and it seems like he was a great guy all around -- but so far as his acting is concerned, I don't get it. It was never my cup of tea.
Vertigo is a dream -- it's not a linear plot. Hitchcock's vertigo is a visual metaphor for time. Here time becomes space. History repeats itself. It's the same story, Told first as tragedy, then as farce. Hitchcock, the director hovers, over the action, forcing the actors into a predetermined plot. Stewart isn't the only monomaniac here, being the director is a little strange.
I don't think it's Hitchcock's best, much less the best film ever. My long-standing theory is that self-serious (usually secular) film critics have become ideologically preoccupied with Existentialism & Freudianism (more recently, Identitarianism). I believe these commonalities are over-represented among films that critics now revere. As such, they'll rank films that feature these subjects far more highly than someone would who doesn't pay them heed (e.g. film-goers in the '50s, who were not effusive about Vertigo). A work will be ascribed value by a critic according to how closely it reflects their ideals. We all do it to a degree, but professional critics hide behind a pretense of objectivity while often being the least neutral. (Tropic Thunder satirizes this well.) Vertigo is a good enough film, but it's endlessly saturated with Freudian motifs of repression & id. So critics will over-rate it according to their subjective (Freudian) criteria of moral import, which so few share. Least of all, people like myself, who believe Sartre & Freud were malignant quacks. Long-winded rant over.
Yeah, I'm never a fan of Hitchcock's more Freudian moments, although I do prefer Psycho (which is perhaps the most Freudian?) over his other largely psychological films (Spellbound, Marnie). But that's more an "in spite of" thing rather than "because of."
@@Weiselberry Agreed. Psycho is great (except for the overwrought exposition scene at the police station). But it's great because of drama, not Oedipal theories.
Vertigo is a beautiful-looking film but the story makes no sense. There's a theory that Vertigo is happening in Scottie's mind as he falls to his death. We never see his rescue, which on the face of it, seems to be impossible. This would account for the abrupt changes in tone and character behaviour. Not to mention the overall silliness of the story. Vertigo is not a fear of heights; that's acrophobia.
To anyone who hasn't seen Vertigo yet (and plans to) and doesn't want to know about the plot twist, you might want to avoid the comment section. :)
great review! never seen it, but will after this detailed review, Ms J.
Vertigo is my favorite movie of all time. The way Hitchcock weaves a sense of obsession, neurosis, and confusion into every aspect of the film from the music, to the cinematography, to the production design. It is the only film I have watched that made me feel the exact themes it is presents and experience the same emotional roller coaster Scotty is throughout the film.
Bernard Herrmann was (to me) the greatest film score composer. He really could get at the psychology/essence of the film and translate it to music like no other. In "Vertigo"'s opening credits, one beautiful little detail I would like to point out. We first hear the 'hypnotic'/cycling ostinato (repeating pattern) of the strings/harp, and then also the menacing, piercing lines of the brass. When Herrmann returns to these later on [where at the top of the credits it reads "Art Direction - Hal Periera"], he does a neat thing, which I think subconsciously reinforces an off-kilter feeling to the listener: he speeds-up/doubles the ostinato harp line, while at the same time protracting out/slowing-down the brass line. Musically, I think it is a terrific complement to Hitchcock's famous dolly zoom shot...
Cool! I'd never thought of the shift in the music that way before!
Your analysis of the movie’s soundtrack is truly impressive and makes me wish l could’ve experienced the movie with your ears.
I think there is a difference between people who go in blind and see it the first time as an adult vs people who have grown up with it. The twist is just so freaking shocking...
I adore Barbara B.G - especially in this movie. She has always been an understated talent and beauty.
Loved that slow trip through San Francisco in that De Soto
My mom took me to see this movie when it first came out at the theaters in Atlanta. We live just down the street from the theater and I sat by myself in the movie theater at 12 years of age, mesmerized. I don't know why I was so mesmerized unless it was the camera work and the music and the colors. Maybe it was because eventually I would become an art major and end up teaching art and now it's 77 years of age I'm continuing to do art and love music and movies. Especially Hitchcock movies!
Sounds like this movie inspired your entire life.
Thanks for another excellent review - this time Hitchcock's Vertigo. I have to say that Vertigo is my favourite Hitchcock movie along with Rear Window, but I understand your misgivings due to the sheer depressing darkness of the subject matter. Every time I view the film, I sit there in wonder at every aspect of the movie - the story, the characters, the cinematography, set designs, evocative use of colour, Herrmann's passionate and moody score and the brilliant use of location shooting in San Francisco. Thanks again and please keep the reviews of these classics coming.
For me, "Vertigo" is one of the greatest thriller movie in the history. In my humble opinion, is one of the five best productions in the Hitchcock catalogue. James Stewart has one of the greatest performances in all his long career, and Kim Novak bring a fantastic variation between the two characters she had to be. The Bernard Hermann's musical score is a essential part inside the production. Congratulations, for your very good review!
This is an outstanding, highly intelligent review that "gets" so many things about this complex film that most "first-time-watching" reactors miss completely.
I think it's quite normal to have mixed feelings about Vertigo; and indeed, for most viewers, those feelings likely will change with each successive viewing. There are so many elements to admire in the filmmaking: the imagery, the use of color, costume, sets and settings; the performances of the principal actors, among many other things. And of course Bernard Hermann's astonishing score. It's an easy film to admire and perhaps love, but, by Hitchcock's design, it's a highly unsettling film, and it isn't, for me, an easy film to like. It conjures complex emotions that preclude mere likeability.
A couple of summers ago I went to the actual Mission that Vertigo was filmed at. It looks exactly the same now as it did in the film. It was a cool experience to be there. I hate to pick a favorite Hitchcock but this one is close to the top of my list. Also, I don't think I would have liked it as much if Kim Novak wasn't in the movie. She is so attractive and she draws you into the film. Thanks for the review.
Book Pal Agreed about Kim’s presence. No offense to Vera Miles, but it wouldnt have been as compelling, not only because of Kim’s beauty but also her ability to express vulnerability.
I have never heard anybody speak of this. In the scene in the barn Scotie is talking to Judy. She is facing outside looking over his shoulder at something.
For a second we see it too.
Its Elster pulling up in his car with dead wife. This is Judy's signal to go up tower. Took me 2 views of movie to see it. WOW ! Love Hitchcock.
Great observation! I always notice that worried look she gives, but till now I'd never associated it with Elster himself.
I love this film, and I feel that your review of it was very fair, it's a complex and in many ways a disturbing tale, quite definitely of obsession, not just on James Stewart's character either, but just about all of the characters, the husband about wanting rid of his wife and the story that goes along with it, Mitch's with man that she wants but can't be with because of herself, as she was the one who called off their marriage, Judy who wants the man who she met in a lie, a person who only see the character she portrayed and not the real her, all the people in this are driven by one obsession or another, and I think this is why in the end they all lose.
My fave Hitch flick of all-time. Stewart & Novak are both heart-breakingly perfect - a DynamicDuo. Poignant and elegiac.
The actors Jimmy Stewart and Kim Novak had real personal chemistry with each other in the 2 movies they did together in 1958, and I believe that it shows on camera. Kim Novak talked in an interview about “probably the most honest, beautiful time of an animal instinct I’ve known” in reference to her feelings toward Stewart when she was with him on set in Bell, Book and Candle.
I recently rewatched The Stranger with Orson Welles and the climactic scene in the clock tower immediately reminded of the climactic scene in Vertigo.
Vertigo is my all time favorite movie. There is no other film that makes me feel the same way.
Excellent review. This is top 3 movies of all time, for me. There's not just one plot-twist in Vertigo, there's a few, and weaved like The Symposium . Hitchcock said it was his masterpiece. Must've been frustrating for him that it flopped in '58.
Enjoyed your review, and as the Bernard Herrmann score is a favorite of mine, I had it playing in the background while watching the review. VERTIGO, I think, has become my favorite Hitchcock movie. It was stuck in the vault for a large portion of my life, but once I got to see it sometime in the 80s, I began to realize how special it was. Today, in the days of high definition and Blu-rays, the film gets even better as the colors become so vibrant and so important to the plot. Who can think of Madeline and not think of the color green?
Since making this video, I've listened to the entire soundtrack separately several times. I think it's become one of my favorite scores too.
I think this is really a movie which, by means of an extreme premise, deconstructs romantic notions associated with "love" while exposing the manipulative and self-centred agenda that often accompanies such.
Scotty is effectively "in love" with a woman who doesn't exist. Maddy is an ethereal, fantasy creature who really only lives in his imagination. His projection of this fantasy onto Judy reveals the utterly self-gratifying nature of this "love". He has no real interest in Judy as a person in her own right but only in what he can mold her into.
Scotty is an emotionally immature character. He is still, as a middle-aged man, a bachelor. Regarding Midge he has an association with a woman that he clearly has a rapport with and who obviously harbour's genuine love for him. She would most likely make a very good companion for Scotty, given the chance.
Instead, he chooses to chase a dream, a fantasy, apparently happier to pursue an image rather than an adult relationship.
I like to think that this movie is about the main character's journey from out of his childish notions of love into a kind of emotional manhood. Through a "trial by fire" he overcomes his vertigo which is perhaps a metaphor for *fill in the blank* and if a sequel were to be made, we'd find him happily married and content with Midge, occasionally reflecting on the entanglement that nearly ruined him but from which he emerged wiser and stronger.
No, it's not Hitchcock's best film, in my view. While *The Lady Vanishes* lives, how could it be? 😁 Yet it is a very thought-provoking piece that definitely repays repeat viewings. I love the photography also, which lends an almost otherworldly air to the locations.
Of particular note is the apartment scene with Maddy bathed in a green glow making her appear ghost-like and unattainable (as indeed she is).
Anyway, a very good picture and way better than *Citizen Kane* for sure. Apologies if you're a *Kane* fan 🙂
Thanks for the review 👍
He's being taken in by a deceptive illusion, made more believable by Judy/Madeleine's real feelings for him. Scotty is vulnerable because of trauma, and the "vertigo" one gets from sailing to the heights of emotion renders him incapable of understanding what is happening until it is too late. Calling Scotty "immature" doesn't really fit, except in the sense that he does not have cynicism about women that is taken for granted in today's main leads. Vertigo is about psychology, and it is about how a certain vulnerability, a combination of physical and mental injury, leads to a vulnerability to severe delusion. The end of his police career made him vulnerable to the delusion about Madeleine being real, the death of Madeleine at the tower made him a psychological wreck. When he is out of the hospital, recovers from the catatonia (I guess that was the result of his immaturity, eh?) he is possessed by a mad compulsion to try to find Madeleine, so when the incredible happens and he meets her doppelganger, he has simply become wholly detached from reality. Vertigo is about a certain type of psychological disability, injury, weakness, being aggravated to the point that it leads to madness. One can say his ideas of romantic love are deluded, but by that point he is basically on autopilot (having nothing else to live for) until the appearance of Carlotta's jewelry snaps him out of it.
The belief that Madeleine has been restored to him removes enough pain that he's actually able to get back into the detective's frame of mind.
@@2ndavenuesw481 I think it's important to remember that Scottie is, by training and profession, both a detective and a lawyer, and those instincts kick back in when he sees the necklace and starts putting two and two together.
back in film school, our theory professor would teach the freshmen a sort of overview of the history of cinema, and then the next three years were spent on a variety of topics. i took theory classes about the avant-garde, horror and exploitation (we were a stone's throw from 42nd st. and NYC) the silent era, westerns, and about hitchcock. i loved my teacher, he was a truly brilliant little man with an incredibly broad pool of knowledge and a rather eclectic sensibility. he was also a very hard a, and i'm still proud of my marks. as long as you could argue your point and back it up, flights of fancy could be welcome. anyhow, we'd just watched vertigo, and he was discussing the film with the many students, matriculated and not, who filled the auditorium. his classes were legendary, and even sciences and humanities students would sit in, spilling out onto the stairs and in the aisles.
i had just watched this movie, again, and we had been talking about the dead and possession and obsession, and whether or not judy had ever truly existed for scottie. he was pacing back and forth, and he asked us who it was that emerges from the darkness of the bell tower to precipitate the final moments of the film. there were a lot of answers, all of which were unsatisfactory to him. i wasn't very brave in class, but finally squeaked out "in that moment--the nun, she's not a nun. she's a ghost. she's madeleine's ghost" which elicited a great aha! lots of clapping, and a new discussion about revenge. i was red faced, but so pleased. it's one of my favorite memories of that class and that professor. i was just so excited to be on the same wavelength as someone whose thoughts i respected so much.
Just discovered your wonderful insightful channel.
This is my favorite Hitchcock. It's hypnotic with a superb score and fantastic visuals. It has been a favorite since I first saw it on TV after it was released from the vaults.
Last year I saw it for the first time on a big screen. Wow! Jimmy Stewart's greatest performance only he could go that dark for Hitchcock. Can you imagine Cary Grant in this? This i think is the reason it flopped originally. He makes you squirm. Nobody wanted to see that. And I believe the gods had a hand in insuring that Kim Novak was cast instead of Vera Miles. This is her greatest performance. She and Jimmy have great chemistry. I love them together in Bell, Book, and Candle as well. Maybe that's why I've never been conscious of an age difference.
I remember reviewers saying the plot reveal was a mistake and happened too early. It took a couple of viewings before I realized how wrong they were. The final portion of the movie would have no impact at all.
I love this disturbing tragic love story. I can think of no other movie like it. It is in a class by itself.
My wife, on the other hand, just doesn't get it. Her favorite Hitchcock is Psycho. Not a bad choice, just not mine.
Maybe it's just me but I think the wrong person fell at the end.
Thank you for the great comment, and welcome to the channel!
You are one of the best movie reviewer on RUclips. Thank you so much !
Aw, thank you!!
Part of the genius of this piece is that it doesn't matter what you or I WANT to happen -- sad ending -- happy ending --- it's just.... an ending... a series of events that has led to this final moment that resolves all the conflict of the the earlier part of the film... The film (Hitchcock) is indifferent to our needs... as is the Universe: sometimes things turn out the way we wish them to; sometimes, they don't and sometimes we are at a loss to understand the denouement. We sit in awe of Fate, with, perhaps a feeling of privilege that we were given a glimpse into these extraordinary events. Perhaps, as Shakespeare said, "it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing..."
Psycho is probably my favorite film but Vertigo is incredible as well... I can see how some call this the greatest film... But the same can be said of Rear Window... I love Stewart’s obsessive portrayal in Vertigo... I personally think it worked out.
Good review JW. It does make my top 25 Hitchcock movies. But it drags too much for me to really love it. I get that it has its greatness. It has its moments of excitement, but the lulls in between those moments don't keep me riveted. And a Hitchcock suspense thriller should keep me riveted.
I will say I like it more than Citizen Caine, but I've never seen Caine as as great as others see it. I get that it's influential, but the story bores me to tears. And since I see movies as a storytelling medium, I can't rank it highly at all.
Im glad to be making my way slowly through your back catalog. It's been fun, and your movie reviews are wonderful.
“At moments throughout, Vertigo’s images shimmer with an incandescent beauty that few films in history could pretend to match, even as other moments- awkwardnesses in the script, longueurs in the storytelling-induce discomforts not originally intended by the director or his crew. Vertigo is not the perfect, pure cinema of Rear Window. Yet who is haunted, dogged, pursued by Rear Window?”
Dan Auiler
Thanks for your work. On the blu-ray, they give an alternate ending which was filmed at the request of the censorship board. Also, in the original story, you don't find out until near the end that Judy and Madeleine are the same person. Hitchcock reveals this halfway through the film, which makes it more interesting. Cheers.
Thank you for this really fair review! I did notice Vertigo’s omission from your Hitchcock series and am very glad to see this. Vertigo, Shadow of a Doubt, and To Catch a Thief are probably my favourites, even though they couldn’t be more different. I think the distinction you draw between admiring a movie and enjoying it is apt. I feel the same way about Sophie’s Choice.
I think the ending is the only logical resolution to this movie. The first time I watched it, I found it perplexing (and abrupt). But the more I think of it: Julie had completely self-abnegated in order to be with Scottie, and Scottie rejected her (“Too late, too late...”); what else was there left for her?
I think the age difference between Stewart and Novak is also purposeful. It adds to the perversity and toxicity of their relationship.
Hey Jerome, i started watching hitchcock movies after going thru your videos and i fell in love with them. I watch them one by one and last week i watched North by Northwest and it's my top fav now, it was like a james bond film before james bond.
Coming to vertigo, it's a good movie. I felt movie was a lil slow in the first half, the end was a bit abrupt too 😅. Also i do have to say, if i was born in that era i wud be impressed, but since many of the things in the movie has now become cliches, it kind of didn't feel something that is the best of alfred Hitchcock.
North by Northwest, rear window and dial M for murder are my personal favorites. Surprisingly, most Hitchcock movies stand test of time. I have watched many interviews of hitchcock n he is now one of my fav directors too ✌️
Love your videos, and i think you're beautiful.
Kim Novak's performance is utterly brilliant. At first she comes off incredibly over the top, but as you come to find out later (SPOILERS) that's entirely the point!! When she plays a "real" character, it's a great contrast, and she is brilliant at portraying a woman reluctantly transforming herself into someone she's not, because she's so desperate for affection. In a way, her character is almost as obsessed and desperate as Scottie. More tragic, even.
After watching Vertigo many many times n from your analysis of the film, Hitchcock intended to purposely keep the viewing audience off-balance through out the film. That's the feeling I have even after watching it numerous times.
Thanks for your film analysis. Looking forward to your next one.
For the 2nd week in a row I am glad you weren't yet able to review the Godzilla movie, because look what you did instead: you dared to review one of the most reviewed and discussed movies of all time! And a damn fine job you did too! You Jerome should never ever feel intimidated to review a film such as this - I've seen you tackle other great classic films and you always do an excellent job displaying insight and pointing out details that I may have missed. As for my feelings on Vertigo, I'm pretty much on point with you - It is a great film by any yardstick but I can think of a good few Hitch films which I have enjoyed more, I do think that this was Stewart's most interesting role and perhaps the best performance of his career. Anyway, once again, awesome review Jerome!
You summed up my feelings about this movie perfectly.
I first saw this movie in the early eighties, in a movie theater that just played old movies. It was great. I also saw more Hitchcock movies in that theater. Although I don't like the ending, it's a wonderful film.
I recently read the novel "Vertigo" is based on. The first part is almost identical to the movie. The main difference is that it is set in Paris in the spring of 1940 when the Germans were fast approaching the gates of Paris. The feeling of impending doom gives the whole story an air of urgency and irreality, which nicely matches the bizarre plot and makes the Scottie character's gullibility believable. After Madeleine appears to fall to her death, the protagonist escapes to North Africa, returning to France shortly after the liberation (but before the end of the war). Here (+SPOILER ALERT+) the story deviates a little from the movie, and the ending - while essentially the same - is extremely brutal. Let's put it this way - fake Madeleine doesn't fall from a bell tower this time... The Scottie character differs somewhat in the fact that he's no Jimmy Stewart. An alcoholic since his traumatic experience as a policeman, he's a generally unpleasant character and it's hard to root for him. But it's a decent novel and well worth reading!!
Thanks. Very comprehensive overview, as per usual from you, knowing how much to detail to hit on and what to stay away from for the sake of new viewers of older films like this. I first saw VERTIGO at the drive in with my parents! Not idea way to see a VistaVision film. I always remembered the zoom-in/pull back effect which was used so effectively to suggest falling/not-falling, an effect used so often since VERTIGO's release (most notably in that beach scene in JAWS). I understand this film's rise to the top of "best of" status, though I feel that that first place kind of honor (to me) is better given over to films (like CITIZEN KANE) that deal with bigger, more universal themes than personal stories (of course, personal stories can also convey big, universally-applicable themes). I'm just saying that I prefer a film that can tell both a personal story and one with multiple layers of thematic substance on all kinds of levels, and I feel KANE and films like it tend to do that. In fact, a lot of the controversy about "best films" voted by the Academy has been the questioning of why certain less popular films have won out so often over extremely popular movies. I understand that very clearly, as the Oscar is not, in theory (as well as often in practice) not a popularity context, but an effort to acknowledge a film that aspires to the widest range of themes, that are aimed beyond only entertainment (not that that the choices over the decades are beyond question either). I tend to agree with what was the original philosophy of the Academy, which, after all, was meant for acknowledgement among peers---an "insiders' award, so to speak---rather than popularity. Yes, it still turned out that many films of highest quality have lost out to far more successful, popular movies, but i still support the principle. Anyway, I SUPER digress into an area that makes a lot of people's blood boil, so...er, guess I should just get back to the subject at hand. VERTIGO. An amazingly inventive film that certainly overlaps into a variety of "types" as you say---crime, ghostly, thriller, romance....Again, thanks for the posting!
Great review. Thank you very much. When I'm in the right mood, Vertigo may be the best movie ever made. But it isn't the easiest of Hitch's stuff. It lacks his humor, adventure and it has a slow, dreamish pace. Rear Window,, Shadow of a Doubt, Psycho, The 39 Steps are all easier to watch for some "fun" Hitch. But, as I said, when I am ready for something more serious. Wow. Novak (in essentially if not literally a double role) and Stewart give the best performances of their careers. And the last 1/3 is mesmerizing. Judy maybe an accomplice to murder, but we feel for her. For me, the ending is perfect. I can't think of a more powerful image and they cut away. Awesome.
Your conviction about not giving away the plot is very commendable. You always handle that so thoughtfully. This is my favorite movie. I have watched it annually since 2007, and I had seen it several times before that. For me the best movies are all about how they make me feel, and 'Vertigo' really packs a punch, even after so many viewings. I feel that a really good movie can be experienced as a piece of music. Would listening to Beethoven's 9th once a year be too much? I don't think so. It's hard to describe how 'Vertigo' makes me feel. I really empathize with Scotty Ferguson. But I can see why others might be uncomfortable in places, especially women. The implausibility of the story has never bothered me, but I do wonder about one particular moment: When Judy opens her door to find Scotty standing there. How could she not be startled or react even a tiny bit?
Good point. I've often scrutinized her face in that moment, trying to detect some barely visible sign that betrays her reaction. I never catch one, though.
Hitchcock has left the audience confusing and still wondering if this is really the same woman. If Judy showed any expression seeing Scottie at the door the audience would know right away. Its not up to her to give the big twist plot away at that moment, not just yet. Hence why she has to act like Scottie was a completely stranger to her.
Midge's fatal flaw is her obsession with Scottie, but she sits on the border of obsession and loyalty; it's relatively grey because loyalty and obsession are treated hand in hand to no benefit to her or Scottie, who she seems to care a lot about.
I love the range of Kim Novak on display in Vertigo... Scottie isn't interested in Judy, he's interested in the idea of a person she could be.
My favorite movie. Each time I watch it, I see something new.
It's definitely one of the all time great movies. So great that you don't even stop to think how preposterous the whole wife murder scheme is. How can anyone plan and execute such an elaborate scheme and succeed? Find someone to impersonate your wife. Seduce a detective to the point of obsession so he chases you to the top of a bell tower just in time to throw your murdered wife off the tower. And doing this hoping that his vertigo would keep him from reaching the top of the tower in time. Preposterous scheme, but we're caught up in Scotties obsession so much that we're not bothered by these prosiac details.
I agree with your review (btw, don't read this if you don't want spoilers). I think it's a great movie but it's not my favorite Hitchcock film. I don't mind the parts that are creepy and upsetting, I think you got it right, that's what Hitchcock wanted and that's what being obsessed with someone is like (talking from personal experience unfortunately). What always bothered me was the ending. It just seems so abrupt and also kind of unfair. She was an accomplice to the guy murdering his wife but we don't know that she knew that. She just took a job and got sucked into something much more complex and sinister than she ever imagined. It seems like such an easy way out when suddenly "she's dead now". I've often wondered if the ending was partly due to the movie code that was just starting to go away but I think was still in force for this film. Where a criminal couldn't be seen getting away with their crime. Whatever the reason I find the ending very unsatisfying. I think Psycho is Hitchcock's masterpiece. Everything about that film is perfect and it is such a shift from conventional mysteries where we start with someone who seems to be the protagonist only... to have her be out of the picture. I also like Rear Window and North by Northwest more. Those two are the two I never get tired of rewatching because of the excellent way they integrate humor and mystery/tension. BTW, anyone who likes Vertigo should check out Body Double by Brian DePalma. It's a big nod to Vertigo as well as Rear Window and IMO a really amazing film. That one also had an ending I found unsatisfying the first time but after multiple viewings it makes sense.
I admit to watching Vertigo multiple times, hoping against hope that I'll feel differently about it. I never do. It strikes me as a very cold and abstract film. A great exploration of dark themes that never leads to a catharsis. I'll keep watching it though, and that confirms it's allure.
You are not alone. I have loved Hitchcock’s films for 50 years but I have never managed to love Vertigo, or even like it very much.
You are allowed to like - or dislike - any movie you want.... everyone has different tastes... that's why there are more flavors of ice cream than just Vanilla.... :D
Yes, Midge was a unique character in a Hitchcock film. Once saw an interview with Hitchcock where he said, "The audience should suffer as much as possible."
Kim Novak is amazingly beautiful. Jimmy is a little older in his love affair with Novak, but it's okay for me. Jimmy is a lucky man.
The movie had no ups and downs in the first half and was sometimes boring. But after Madeleine fell from the tower and died, the movie became very thrilling and mysterious. I was really surprised when Judy proved to be Madeleine and the crimes she was involved in were revealed.
Hitchcock's first choice for Madeline was not Novak. This was a very interesting behind-the-scenes story, but I think Novak was a perfect fit for that role. Finally, a nun suddenly emerged from the darkness, Madeline mistook the nun for a ghost (?), and she fell from the tower in horror (and perhaps she died). I was worried that Scottie would follow her and throw himself out of the tower.
Personally, I prefer Rear Window and Psycho, but Vertigo is a movie worth seeing.
Stewart's and Novak's age difference isn't so hard to swallow when you realize that Madeline is married to one of Scotty's old college buddies, Gavin Elster. She apparently goes for older men. Then, when Madeline becomes a rich widow, Uncle Charlie will murder her, not realizing that she's spending her own fortune and not her late husband's.
You and your followers may enjoy thinking about this question, which I think may have been raised a few years ago by a reviewer. It concerns a scene that could have been left out of the movie. After Scottie has found Judy and talked to her in her room, she thinks through her options which admit to us that she was an accomplice to a murder. So from then on, we're effectively waiting to see if she can carry off a dreadful secret. If we weren't shown her inner dialogue, would it have helped or hindered the movie?
I might have actually seen the reviewer you're referring to discuss this question. If I did, hopefully I don't just end up repeating something I heard someone else say. It certainly would have been an interesting change. Without her confirmation that she and Madeleine were, in fact, the same person, the next part of the film would have been more of a mystery--how is this girl so similar, is she a ghost, is she actually the same person? But Judy giving us that information lets us in on the secret; we know something our main character doesn't know, so then we're waiting for him to figure it out too and bracing for his inevitable bad reaction. Thus you've got the suspense that Hitchcock was most known for. I couldn't say if the movie would be better or worse without that scene, but I bet Hitchcock wouldn't have wanted to go in that direction. He almost always opted for suspense over mystery.
I also think it would change the emotions in the climactic scene. As is, we've been clued in for a while, gotten a little used to the idea, and watched Judy squirm with the discomfort of the lie. We've had enough time and insight to take pity on her and view her sympathetically, so we feel sorry for her when he's accusing her and treating her roughly. If we'd found out what she did at the same time Scottie did, our vicarious sense of outrage and betrayal would be fresher and more intense. Possibly we might have been rooting for Scottie to get revenge, maybe even to kill her. That would have completely changed the tragic mood of their final moments together. I might have even made if feel like more of a film noir. Anyway, that's my view. Personally, I like the movie fine the way it is, and I admit it's hard for me to imagine it any other way. I couldn't say if it would have been better or worse without that scene. It would have been different, though.
@@Weiselberry Great reply- I feel the same indecision. Occurred to me recently that eliminating it would have been riskier, since our disbelief would have been stretched a little further, but besides the great job Novak did of creating a different person, Hitchcock would have something else going for him- we are acquainted with the occasional practice of using the same actor to play entirely different people. So I think he might have gotten away with it, and your ideas about the final scene would all be correct.
I just discovered your reviews. I'm looking forward to my favorite Hitchcock, Notorious. I also hope that you review Noel Coward's In Which We Serve & The Archers' A Matter of Life and Death. I greatly appreciate the effort you must expend to produce your reviews.
Thank you! I've seen In Which We Serve (really liked it), but I think it was just before I started doing my monthly mini reviews, so I never talked about it. A Matter of Life and Death, on the other hand, I did discuss in a mini review here: ruclips.net/video/VOLcqbHSc8U/видео.html.
This is the first video of your channel that I have watched. It was excellent! Your reviewing skills are top notch! Me thinks I should check out your other videos too!
Thank you, I'm glad you enjoyed it!
Another terrific review, I've seen Vertigo quite a lot but was fortunate enough to see it recently again but on the big screen for the first time, seeing the nightmare scene on such a large screen was pretty incredible. Your feelings on the character Midge are very interesting, I have never read a review where her character was given as much empathy and attention as you've shown her, she absolutely deserves it, I've always felt bad for her, but!...she has a great apartment :) strangely whenever I think of Hitchcock I think of apartments, homes in general. Midges great apartment in Vertigo with a fantastic view, the guys apartment in Rope, another great view, James Masons characters house right next to Mount Rushmore in North by Northwest, and probably my favourite film set ever, Stewart's apartment along with all the other apartments surrounding it in Rear Window, I think I could live there even with a murderer living across from me lol. I also love the Library and the little town from Shadow of a Doubt, my favourite Hitchcock film. I do like Vertigo a lot but it's behind other Hitchcock films for me, it would be in my top five though, it can be an awkward watch at times for the very reasons you've mentioned. Where some think bloody shower scenes when Hitchcock's name comes up others think brown suits and apartments lol. ~ thank you Ms Weiselberry ~
Wow, I can't say I'd really thought about it before, but you're absolutely right, the apartments in Hitchcock movies are great!
In my late teens/early twenties I considered Vertigo my favourite Hitchcock film, but as I get older it slips further and further back to the point where now I wouldn't even rate it in my top ten. Partly because I've seen more now, and partly because my tastes have changed a little over the years. It's probably even third place in the Stewart/Hitchcock collaboration rankings for me now.
That's an interesting trajectory, sort of the opposite of my own in the sense that I've come to appreciate and understand the movie more as I get older. I don't gain affection for it, though, so it doesn't claim a spot on my top ten list either.
SPOILER ALERT!!!!!
Sometimes I like to imagine that Scottie realized that Judy actually was Madeleine the moment he first (?) saw her. That instead of using Judy as a prop for his obsession with Madeleine, he deliberately tortures her to get even with what she did to him. Even without taking things to this extreme, there's the question of when Scottie first figures it out.
I've lived in the San Francisco Bay Area my whole life, so one of my pleasures in watching Vertigo is all the location shots. These make all those scenes of Scottie driving around the city more interesting to me than they might be to most people.
As for whether Vertigo is the best movie of all time: I think it's kind of silly to take creative works like movies, music, painting, etc. and treat them like sports teams with winners and losers, where only one gets to win the championship. Just about everyone agrees that Vertigo is a great film. What does it serve to hold it up next to another great film like Citizen Kane to try to figure out which is better?
I agree, with you, not Hitchcock's best. I would take Rear Window, Psycho, and Strangers on a Train, and maybe a couple of others over it. But very good for sure, and I appreciate your thoughts about it.
Vertigo is a superb dream-like meditation on the human emotion of obsession, and I do think that it is a very high-level Hitchcock film. It’s wonderful to watch on blu-ray with a very good TV and speakers. But it starts to get a bit over-rated when it is ranked as the greatest film of all-time or that it is above Hitchcock’s other excellent films. I think that it is on the same high level as films like Rear Window, North by Northwest, Notorious, The Lady Vanishes, Rebecca, Psycho, etc. Personally, my 2 favorite Hitchcock films are The Lady Vanishes and Notorious, but I would not argue with anyone who prefers Vertigo as their favorite. It’s great for what it sets out to achieve.
Vertigo is my favourite film of all time, Rear Window is fairly high up too, at least top 5 up with Silence of the Lambs, Chasing Amy, and Casablanca (Casablanca is weird film for me, throwing out a water of Vichy water and kicking it over, and the singing of a song to combat the Nazi's singing in the bar were the most powerful scenes for me). Sunset Boulevard, American Beauty, Goodfellas, Gandhi, and Hereditary round out my top 10. From Hitchcock, I also really like Rebecca, Dial M for Murder, Spellbound, and Notorious. But I also really like a bunch of other films as well: North by Northwest, Psycho, Strangers on a Train, Rope, and so on... I almost feel like you can't go wrong with Hitchcock. Even Family Plot, which I think is considered his worst.
Oh, and since you don't like queasy, NEVER watch Hereditary =P
This film recently overtook Citizen Kane as number one in Sight and Sound's influential poll of the best films ever made. Personally, I don't like these best of beauty contests since they are inherently absurd. Beauty is ultimately in the socialised eye of the beholder and no one, no one, has ever seen every film made. That said, this is to me a great film.
If Vertigo hadn't been restored and favored by Scorsese it wouldn't be #1. If Citizen Kane hadn't had a political context in which Hearst blackballed Orson Welles then it would never have been #1. However, everyone has favorites. It isn't taking away from great movies that they are not a favorite. Vertigo being a favorite movie of so many film fans is not surprising, really. In the future, it will be harder to rely on lists of favorites because the political aspect is coming into the fore again.
Definitely my favourite Hitchcock film, but also my favourite film ever its beyond brilliant ❤
This is my very favorite Hitchcock. The first time I saw it the whole second part surprised me, and Novack is so good it took me a while to figure out she really was the same person. His obsession with her is very disturbing - yet he is still a detective and somehow cuts through all of that to the truth, and in spite of her ignorance of what was intended in the murder plot, I don't think a happy ending would have been possible.
I enjoy your Hitchcock reviews, so thanks for this. I was wondering when you'd get to it. By the way, I left a comment on your Psycho review sometime in the past year, which you probably haven't seen, so you can look if you're interested.
yes - the movie is squirm-worthy for Scotty's obsession - like psycho is psychopathic - read window is voyeuristic - each person reacts differently to each and every movie theme - nothing wrong with that - - this was a very good analysis of the film
When my kids hit puberty, I'm going to sit them down and have them watch this film. Then I'm going to tell them to find themselves a good Midge, and don't go chasing after Madelines. Also, don't be a Judy -- if who you truly are isn't enough for a romantic partner, they're not worth it.
Certainly not "Best Film of All - Time," but a Hitchcock masterpiece. Stewart's acting is brilliant, particularly in that final scene going up the stairs.... you know.... brilliant.
Great movie, but i think my favorite Hitchcock is a toss up between Notorious and North by Northwest, maybe because they both have happy endings. You mentioned obsession here, which massage me think of Brian De Palma's movie Obsession from 1976. De Palma always paid Homage (or maybe just copied) Hitchcock, but Obsession copies Vertigo in its theme and mood.
I love the Midge character, and think it's a shame that we never find out what happens with her. It would be super cool if someone made a spinoff sometime that follows her as the lead and explores her life.
I would like to think that Scotty and Midge came together after the tragic events of Vertigo and got married and had a family.
For me, I like to imagine that the reason Midge and Scotty never wound up together is because Midge knew deep down just how messed up he was, and rejected him as a real romantic possibility, but still loved him and enjoyed his company despite knowing that he was a creepy weirdo.
Maywither Dragon That’s horrible, ha ha! What an awful thing to imagine. Jimmy Stewart is awesome, he just got bewitched by a beautiful woman in distress.
That’s a good idea.
This is my 2nd favorite Hitchcock film next to Rear Window.
This is a movie that I never really quite understood. That being said, these women that review these movies have given me some hope that society isn't completely dumbed down almost to the earth's core. Thanks.
Dolly Zoom is also called a "stretch" in the biz.
I sensed you might’ve been holding back but I’m always open with people that Vertigo doesn’t even crack my top 10 for Hitchcock. I rarely give “overhyped” as a reason I didn’t care for a film because I strive to judge a movie based on what it is rather than what I wanted it to be, and I’d rather disassociate myself from people who frankly can be rather annoying about movies not meeting their expectations, but Vertigo was one of my most highly anticipated movies of all time so it’s sort of inevitable that I fall prey to this dreaded affliction in such a case.
My beef with Vertigo is that the Madeleine ghost story portion just isn’t worth dedicating so much time to. It should’ve been wrapped up far more quickly because the film really only gets steam going when Judy shows up and Scotty attempts to fashion her into what he believes to be his lost love. That portion holds so much intrigue and promise but I can’t help but feel that it’s squandered with that abrupt-to-a-fault ending. It feels forced to me. Compared to the graceful dance present in endings of say, Psycho or Rear Window that completely impress upon you the magic of cinema in an effortless seeming way. Vertigo just makes me think, “Huh....that was clumsy.”
But as I said, the moments of greatness, while fleeting, are great. Additionally, any word of praise that is breathed about the score I side with entirely. I’m almost okay with Vertigo being dubbed the greatest just because that haunting score is connected to it. I remember actually thinking the movie would be worth my while because the marriage of the opening credit sequence and music is so spine-chilling. Sadly, I just couldn’t bring myself to feel like that about the majority of what followed. As far as stories of obsessive love are concerned, I’ll take Laura into my corner and be content with that.
Ha, you're kind of right: I didn't overtly state it, but Vertigo doesn't seem to make it into my Hitchcock top 10 either. Oh yes, given a choice between the two, I would definitely choose Laura over Vertigo. Love that movie.
You have so many videos posted!!!!! I have so many questions for you! Not about this video or any of them but how it is possible to have posted this much content!!
I've not seen your Godzilla reviews cuz Godzilla was not a particular favorite of mine. Not even as a kid. So not having seen your reviews I wasn't sure if you'd already made mention of some of its cinematic origins. But I was wondering if you've ever delved a little into the history of stop motion animation and photography. Especially around the turn of the last century . I just saw an interesting RUclips about wladislas starewicz who was a pioneer in the field. If you've not seen it you might wanna check it out. It's short but interesting. Influenced the making of king Kong and Godzilla.
I agree with your vertigo review totally.
Hi Jerome, I just discovered your website through this link and look forward to viewing more of your thoughts on Hitchcock, books, and other movies! I like your enthusiasm! Over time, "Vertigo" has become my favorite Hitchcock movie, I think because it is tapping into deeper emotional themes such as trauma, the pain of loss, guilt and resolving these things. Although we think of James Stewart as being the likeable everyman, I find his acting also had this intense/'grimly obsessive' side that could come out in his performances, and "Vertigo" really captures that side really well...I was curious if you've ever seen the interesting movie "Sans Soleil" (1983) by Chris Marker, which weaves an homage to "Vertigo" into its fabric (it's on RUclips, search "Sans Soleil - Insane Memory").
Thanks! Welcome to the channel. :) I'm not familiar with Sans Soleil at all!
This is my fave Hitchcock film....when it isn't Strangers on a Train :)..you seen that one yet?.. Its very amusing.
Yes, a couple times.
First it helps to be a big fan of Kim Novak who was highly effective playing both ice goddesses & tramps equally well .. I've shown this movie to many people who are spellbound every second of the way until the climax where the rug is totally pulled out from under the audience, there was more filmed originally, after letting us ease out of the film but Hitchcock chose to snip it abruptly, a mistake IMO, to an otherwise perfect movie
Thank you as ever (I don't know why I didn't notice this review before). I have spent the morning watching Vertigo again. I have to be honest, I find it very hard going at times. Is it that James Stewart, truly great actor though he was, just doesn't fit the part somehow; was he indeed too old as Hitchcock went on to suggest when the film was poorly received or is that I just can't 'get a handle' on Scottie's character. The pace of the whole thing seems slow to me and yet the ending is so rushed. As you say, the whole thing pivots on a hardly credible co-incidence. Poor Midge! Yet I have to accept the film is now so hugely regarded and therefore I will defer to those more knowledgeable than I and stay with Rear Window et al. Kind regards
Have you ever reviewed REAR WINDOW?
I think the obssession, and flawed Scottie is tough to watch. This is why the movie isn't as popular. The love story finds it hard to rise above it. I'd feel better if Scottie noticed some things that led him to be suspicious of Madeliene/Judy. This is why Rear Window works better with the mystery/voyeur theme. The age difference isn't a big deal. Cary Grant always had lovely younger ladies chasing after him. Just the nice guy Jimmy Stewart is hard to buy as a flawed hero.
Good review. Personally VERTIGO doesn't rank that high on my greatest movies list or even on my list of greatest Hitchcock films. It is memorable, atmospheric beyond measure, visually haunting and I think has one of the best "Holy crap, what just happened!" moments in all of movies not just Hitchcock's. But it's not one I'd watch if I was in the mood for an enjoyable watch or a great Hitchcock movie. I just don’t enjoy it. I feel like great Hitchcock is fun to watch, VERTIGO is a little depressing I guess. I can't really think of any other way of describing how it makes me feel. My personal favorite Hitchcock movie and is, to me at least, the most fun to watch is ROPE. Another fun one is THE TROUBLE WITH HARRY. I need to check if you've reviewed those I'd love to hear what you think of them
I've reviewed Rope, but haven't gotten to The Trouble with Harry. I was actually thinking of doing it recently because it's such a perfect fall movie, but I kind of missed the boat...
@@Weiselberry I hope you do get to review The Trouble With Harry. I'm very interested in your opinion of it. Keep up the great videos, you are consistently one of my RUclips watches I look forward to
Thank you! It's been a long time since I've seen it, but I remember it being one of my favorites when I was younger, for the simple reason that it made me laugh. :)
I think Vertigo, queasy and obsessive, as really unenjoyable as it is, stands yet as Hitchcock's greatest most mature artistic statement. How much more winning and fun are Rear Window and North by Northwest! Yet neither addresses (well Rear Window sort of), the art and pure cinematic style of Vertigo. Is it because of the sad shocking ending? Because the friend is not brought to justice? I think it's because it's just not a good story. I never believed in the central mystery or story like the other two movies; Hitchcock makes his points in the other films and we have fun, enormous fun while he's doing it. Vertigo though, is all about Hitchcock's private obsessions: adulterous feelings, yes, necrophilia!! Is that important for the emergence of a truly great artist? Yes. Is it fun? No!! That's why, perhaps it arouses feelings of admiration though not, perhaps, feelings of love. These are somewhat my own thoughts plus what I've read about Vertigo and Hitchcock. I just remember being a young boy seeing the policeman fall to his death on TV, and then having to go to bed!! And my dad and how much he loved Hitchcock movies. Thanks for your forum and your obvious love and insight and intelligence about cinema.
Thanks for your review. I've always felt Vertigo was one of Hitchcock's most overrated films. And, for some reason, I've never really been a Kim Novak fan. But my mother loved her as an actress!
My favorite Hitchcock films are:
1. Rear Window
2. The Birds
3. Lifeboat
4. Rebecca
5. Psycho
6. Shadow of a Doubt
7. Saboteur
8. Spellbound
Another great review! I've seen this movie years ago and though Kim Novak is drop dead gorgeous, the cinematography great, and that climax!!!!! The movie was a bit of a bore for me. I am thinking about seeing it again later on maybe but it wasn't good my first time seeing it :/
Thanks! I know, there's a big section that can feel especially slow. I'd still recommend checking it out again sometime. Maybe knowing where things are going a second time around would make it a little more engaging? :)
Wouldn't newspaper articles about the mission tower death have shown photos of the victim? Did Scotty not see those photos?
Have you considered reviewing Brian de Palma's movies? It seems Hitchcock fans either hate him or love him and I'd be I'd interested in hearing your insightful thoughts.
I reviewed Phantom of the Paradise by request last October (ruclips.net/video/Q50XQxJQ2xE/видео.html ). My thoughts on it were mixed, so I don't know how I'd feel about other De Palma films. I'm familiar with many of his titles, but none of them have ever grabbed me.
Really thoughtful review
I was going to make a comment about the movie, but I can't articulate what I feel about it (very unusual for me). It is a hard movie to grapple with and I think Jerome Weiselberry did a great job in this video.
Indeed, I much prefer 'Rope' and/or 'Rear Window'.
Ok so ignoring the technical stuff and suchlike all of which you summarised well and swerving any specific spoilers I am happy with identifying with the characters , despite obvious reservations, whilst not sharing your concerns over pace or age differences. However the $64,000 question that you don't quite confront headlong or perhaps can't, understandably, quite decide is how does it it make me feel about about life, the universe and indeed everything. So here's the thing - it makes me miserable. When I think about about things afterwards I actually feel slightly queasy. I think it does the dirt on life (I seem to recall Lawrence coining that one?). So no, I don't think it's Hitch's "best" though it may be one of his most impressive and it's not even a contender for best film of all time. So sue me guys....
"Romey" -- yeah, I'm with you on this one, beautifully made but I don't find anyone in it very sympathetic, particularly Stewart, it gets on my nerves. How far along are you on Hitchcock's movies? Because if you're taking on all of them, I salute you, that takes fortitude. Oh, and you get extra points today for saying "skeedaddle," a verb definitely worth keeping alive just for the fun of it. Looking forward.
As far as the reviews go, this is #21. But I've seen almost all of his suspense films already, many of them multiple times, and a few of his non-suspense movies too. Not sure if I'll review them or not...
I can't recall seeing this one...and the thing is, Jimmy Stewart is probably my favorite actor! Thanks for the spoiler alert. I can't stand when others say things like " Oh it's been so many years, there are no spoilers now...etc..." It's like..um...that's doesn't matter. If some people still haven't seen something, you should always try not to spoiler it. Right? LOL
If Hitchcock thought Jimmy too old, why did he engage the actor? His own dang fault.
Good point.
A movie so good Harvey Danger wrote a song about it.
My film professor said this was the one film where Hitchcock revealed personal things about himself--- his obsession with blondes, his obsessive-compulsive tendency, his controlling personality, and his ability to jerk around an audience and manipulate them into thinking and feeling whatever he wanted. After this film flopped at the box office, he never did it again.
I like Vertigo but it’s not my favorite either. The age difference doesn’t bother me (unlike High Noon). Novak makes me feel creepy. I wonder if it was made in the modern era and there was a bit of skin and a physical relationship between them that it would have made it better. The way it is, the movie almost feels like a dream. Midge is great!
I just discovered your channel and I'm enjoying all your reviews so much. You are very charming, and fun to watch. I'm a big Hitchcock fan myself, have all the movies and books and so forth. I know that some people feel that Vertigo is slow, but to me it has the pace and rhythm of a difficult dream (or nightmare) that one might have. The storyline is not exactly logical either, to say the least, but it definitely has the logic you'd find in a bad dream; things might not add up on the surface, but they fit in perfectly in a deeper, sub-rational way. To me, more than any other movie I've ever seen, Hitchcock captured this dreamlike atmosphere in Vertigo. So I love it for that. However, the one problem I have with the film, and it's the same problem I have with another movie of his that I love, Rear Window, is that, simply, Jimmy Stewart is much too old for the part. I know it's almost a sacrilege to say such a thing, but there it is. His romantic scenes with Kim Novak (and Grace Kelly) have always made me extremely uncomfortable, and I actually can't watch them. He's too old! It always gave me the absolute creeps. He was also too old for the part in Rope, but that's another story. So for me, the casting of Jimmy Stewart undermines these otherwise wonderful films. More than this, I never saw what other people saw in Jimmy Stewart the actor. I know that he was much beloved and respected, and it seems like he was a great guy all around -- but so far as his acting is concerned, I don't get it. It was never my cup of tea.
Thank you! I'm glad you like my videos, and I appreciate your honest opinion. :)
Vertigo is a dream -- it's not a linear plot. Hitchcock's vertigo is a visual metaphor for time. Here time becomes space. History repeats itself. It's the same story, Told first as tragedy, then as farce. Hitchcock, the director hovers, over the action, forcing the actors into a predetermined plot. Stewart isn't the only monomaniac here, being the director is a little strange.
Give it some time (another 20 years), and you will find it is the most significant American movie of the 20th century.
I don't think it's Hitchcock's best, much less the best film ever. My long-standing theory is that self-serious (usually secular) film critics have become ideologically preoccupied with Existentialism & Freudianism (more recently, Identitarianism). I believe these commonalities are over-represented among films that critics now revere.
As such, they'll rank films that feature these subjects far more highly than someone would who doesn't pay them heed (e.g. film-goers in the '50s, who were not effusive about Vertigo). A work will be ascribed value by a critic according to how closely it reflects their ideals. We all do it to a degree, but professional critics hide behind a pretense of objectivity while often being the least neutral. (Tropic Thunder satirizes this well.)
Vertigo is a good enough film, but it's endlessly saturated with Freudian motifs of repression & id. So critics will over-rate it according to their subjective (Freudian) criteria of moral import, which so few share. Least of all, people like myself, who believe Sartre & Freud were malignant quacks. Long-winded rant over.
Yeah, I'm never a fan of Hitchcock's more Freudian moments, although I do prefer Psycho (which is perhaps the most Freudian?) over his other largely psychological films (Spellbound, Marnie). But that's more an "in spite of" thing rather than "because of."
@@Weiselberry Agreed. Psycho is great (except for the overwrought exposition scene at the police station). But it's great because of drama, not Oedipal theories.
Vertigo is a beautiful-looking film but the story makes no sense. There's a theory that Vertigo is happening in Scottie's mind as he falls to his death. We never see his rescue, which on the face of it, seems to be impossible. This would account for the abrupt changes in tone and character behaviour. Not to mention the overall silliness of the story.
Vertigo is not a fear of heights; that's acrophobia.
Not a fan of Vertigo, but I will give it another chance.
Its a good one for hair dos
Great movie