I hear people say they should shift from Kang to Doom. I say they should keep Kang because they've set up everything for Kang. They should give Doctor Doom his time to grow and shine... and be scary. Not give him a rush-job.
Not to mention let’s say hypothetically something like this happens under the person who plays Doom, will marvel just drop the entire Doom character? I’m with you 100% let’s finish Kang not rush anything and then bring on the Doom!
Agree, Doom need his own Arc his own story have him tease if they adapt a Battle World like event as a variant who took advantage of the incursions and build his own world from all of that but still Kang is the big bad till the end of this Saga
My biggest bummer with all of the Jonathan Majors drama (with regards to the MCU) is that he was such an engaging actor and really made an impact with his portrayals. Casting Colman Domingo as Final Kang would certainly assuage any doubt in my head. He was incredible in Euphoria
Yeah, I really enjoyed his performance. It's a bummer but I think they had to do it. I'm generally for giving people second chances and divorcing ones actions from ones art and all but we can talk about that in 10 or 20 years. This is too fresh.
I think it’s pretty important that marvel continues the storyline that they are on, so their best option would probably be to recast Kang, instead of switching it up and finding another villain.
@@PoisonousRakunwtf does that mean? Marvel is a decade ahead of DC morally and visually lmao. DC is so addicted to conservativism they didn't want to do CYBORG let alone Justice League Q or Ivy x Harley
Well 😂he could’ve said he was acquitted of 2 charges & found guilty of the lesser charges 😂😂 just saying Lead with a positive instead of the negative first .
@@onearmedarsenalIt didn’t stop other people from running stories about Majors. It would have been easy for them to offer carefully worded commentary, but they didn’t. I believe in giving praise where it’s due.
@@onearmedarsenal it’s not covering their butts. It’s doing exactly what he said not commenting on speculation until the case came to a close. Innocent until proven guilty. I wish other media outlets and “news” sources would do the same.
You guys are the first you tube channel that hasn’t spoken or covered the case of majors and I respect you guys even more now. Thank you rockstars for keeping it real. Mad respect
That would make sense to watch Jonathan Mayer's a plead go through. He gets his job back. He becomes Kang again and then Coleman get tired before it majors comes back and Coleman also becomes Kang an old er Kang
@@Mr.INEVITABLE55Majors is not coming back because condoning real world violence shouldn't be anyone's priority especially a multi billion dollar company.
@@Supherodude Looking at what he plead guilty to and watching him run like that in that video. It definitely wasn't handled responsibly and this screams hit job. You have the right to retrieve your property with force. This wasn't a DV case this was Buck breaking.
All Majors had to do in that interview was say, "I condemn Hamas and I stand with Israel unconditionally" Watch how fast he would be forgiven and back in Hollywood and Marvel movies before you could do a Thanos infinity gauntlet "fingersnap" Sadly, you have to play the game in Hollywood. Jonathan stay silent which was the worst advice he was given.
I feel sorry for Jonathan Majors. I feel even worse for us Marvel fans, we’ve fallen in love with the actor and the character(s) and we were looking forward on seeing him in the MCU going forward.
8:53 I definitely think Marvel should continue w/ the Kang storyline rather than pivoting to another villain. 8:32 They did kinda shoot themselves in the foot by showing Jonathan Majors playing every version of Kang in the Council of Kangs tho.
Imo that could be explained by them being one faction of Kangs. There could easily be a hierarchy of councils, which leads our thinking into understanding Doom's hierarchy on Battleworld as well. So Majors' Kang collected all the ones with a similar brain pattern to himself, Rama Tut creates other Rama Tut variants and those get sprinkled into other councils depending on their strengths. That could be a fun work around but my intuition says they're gonna do something more vague like "oh that's cute you thought those were the only ones, I have lots more pets" that way post Secret Wars they can still do a bunch w him
For me it's not that much of an issue, besides this isn't the first time the MCU has re-casted a canon character(Rhodey and everyone else) I'm okay with it as long as Kang remains, he's seriously underrated as a villain.
@@jedipadwan20 yeah but if you have him in the fantastic 4 film and tease him in doctor strange and don’t mess it up it might work but I could be wrong we both don’t know until it happens
Definitely not rocking with disney for them dropping Majors. They’ve made bad business decisions for money and it didn’t play out well for them. Dropping a good actor won’t change that.
They should absolutely keep Majors. The serious charges were dropped. There are MCU actors dealing with a lot more serious stuff. If their "standards" are that high, they shouldn't work with anyone in Hollywood.
@@TheCriticalArchitect if you have the chance, go on social media & let Marvel know. With enough pressure maybe they'd keep him. They brought back Gunn...
I actually respect yall a lot for not talking about the trial during it.. too many pages were tryna cover everything (nerdom pages) like why.. tryna say he’s innocent or this and that when there was literally no verdict yet.. it was so weird
Dropping the character of Kang would be the most dumb thing marvel could possibly do at this point. Destroys any continuity moving forward, ruins the lead up to avengers 5, and wouldn’t give a character like Dr Doom the proper depth and lead up they deserve. Plus it would set the precedent that if an actor in the future were to f up, they would drop that character - what if the actor for Dr Doom gets convicted of something midway through their story? Do they then just completely drop Dr Doom as a character? Keeping and recasting Kang gives them a chance to set a precedent for how they deal with these issues in the future.
Except for that pesky clause in his contract that he is the only actor to be Kang. Unless there's another clause that states legal issues negates first clause, their hands are tied.
@ghiggs8389 Of course, there's an "unless" clause. It's pretty common knowledge that any actor working under Disney signs some sort of upstanding moral character agreement. He broke that agreement. There is absolutely no way that Marvel and Disney don't have a well thought out contingency plan for each and every one of their actors.
The fact that you held off on speculating on the JM trial and then explained why after his trial had reached its verdicts are the very reasons I hold you guys in such high regard moreso than other RUclips channels and even most actual news outlets.
Just want to say I appreciate your ethical approach to the Jonathan Majors story. Obviously, as MCU fans, we want to know what’s going on, but it’s important that we’re getting good information. And people on the internet farming for clicks and attention are NOT good sources of information.
I appreciate the care and attention in covering this casting matter. NR definitely would have lost me, and everyone I recommend, if the teams approached this recklessly.
Thank you, thank you, thank you for pointing out the importance of journalistic integrity and influencers trying to sway public opinion!! Too many in our society base what they think on what other people tell them to think instead of thinking for themselves!
I really do appreciate your guys integrity as a channel. I know it's comics and pop culture for the most part but what this world really needs y'all always deliver in spades........ transparency
I respect your humility and integrity in wanting to do journalism well and not feeling socially pressured into saying something about which you don't have all the facts for. Thank you! I wish more organizations and celebrities and people would do this for all topics.
Best person to replace him with is John Boyega!!! After seeing they cloned Tyrone and never realizing he was Fontaine until weeks later when I randomly googled the cast, he can definitely pull it off! That boy can act for real, and can definitely pull off the look without skipping a beat!!!!
Coleman is cinema excellence and so is Majors. I have a hard time transitioning to Coleman as Kang because Jonathon seal that role and he IS Kang. This one is a hard one for me.
Didn’t they break this tradition though by recasting William Hurt’s character? He is a major character I feel like since he was a big part of the start of the civil war.
Now im not supporting what Majors did i just find it funny how Disney and Marvel will drop Majors for what he did even though the people who run Disney behind the scenes have undoubtedly done worse in their lives im just saying its kinda hypocritical now with that said Majors made his choices and will have to live with them
I feel like it’s too early for Doctor Doom, he should be the villain for the next saga. I wouldn’t mind Coleman being the recasted Kang. Hell maybe even make Green Goblin the villain
I will say though I'm not fully engaged in this drama, I will say you and your team did an excellent job covering this mess. You were always neutral which helped me be neutral when emotions could easily be swayed by the masses 💪 Great Job!
So glad to hear there is a journalist... you... who holds themselves to a moral and ethical standard... even calling out your colleagues who do not do the same.
Love your (and the NR team’s) honesty on the Major’s topic. I was actually wondering why you were quiet the past year. But understand it now and VERY much appreciate it!
"Well, that's the beautiful thing about Kang in the comics. He is defeated a lot. In fact, it's almost comedic how often he loses. The scary thing is that he's not defined by his failure, and he can keep coming back stronger and stronger," Loveness argued. "It's not like you can just blow up the mothership, just beat him once and you're done. He is almost an existential threat, and the more you fight him the worse he's going to get."
I think Coleman Domingo would kill it in that role, maybe even better than Majors would have. Majors is good but sometimes he plays things too big, Coleman feels more natural. He also looks similar enough to him that it could be more believable that maybe he was a descendant or maybe the original "Kang". The Kangs also didn't all look alike in the comics so they really should take advantage of the multiverse by having others play all different characters.
_The Kangs also didn't all look alike in the comics_ This is a mess. Two seasons of Loki and one movie that was a flop and yes - they did all look alike, period. Marvel thinking they can paper over this is DCU level - babies in the microwave and Cavil refusing to shave his moustache level dumb. It's MODOK level dumb. It's that bad.
Much respect for not covering anything about the Jonathan Majors trial while it was all still speculation. Lesser channels would have covered it (and clickbaited it) for the deluge of engagement
Props to y’all for having journalistic integrity. We were all curious but there’s so much misinformation today and I appreciate this channel for being objective. Love you guys!
When asked about popular rumors that he would be replacing Majors as Kang the Conqueror, he replied, "I don't know, right now... I'm always looking at what I have to do right now... I know there's talk and conversations around, and I don't know how much is true. I don't even get that from my team. I can't tell if it's true or not." Domingo added, "The fans are passionate. Somehow my name is out there in the world. I like the idea of just having your name called and someone speaking lovingly and kindly about something is a beautiful thing."
Just to clarify what you said there is only sentencing for the reckless assault charge the harassment charge is not a crime but a violation. It holds the same weight as a speeding ticket.
If you think about it, Kang wanted to control time and time lines, and in a way, Majors did just that... he changed the entire direction of the MCU. Majors, like Kang, affected TIME!! You might say he embodies the character he plays too well.
I think you could have Coleman Domingo would be a great choice as a kang replacement. They could say that this kang is from further in the future and is the strongest kang and any other variants could be older versions, like the councle of kangs seen in quantimana could have been the past and it took so long that they aged 20 years
Thank you for calling out the fact that its dangerous for influencers and bloggers with no background in journalism try to "report" on these cases. they do more harm than good, spreading misinformation and bias
I’m glad NR took the high road during the trial. I try not to waste my time on speculation if I’m not personally involved. I think we all had a feeling he was going to be found guilty to some degree. Thanks NR to sticking with basic facts on this one 🙂
Hard no to a story pivot. There are near infinite kangs so having the best of them played by a handful of actors would be wise and safer ground for Disney going forward.
The stupidest possible thing Marvel could do would be to drop the character of Kang and do a rush job on someone like Dr Doom. They need to finish this storyline and commit to the character, otherwise they ruin any continuity going forward and set the precedent for themselves that they should throw a character and entire storyline in the garbage if any actors in the future are in a similar situation.
I think they should use him, I have a line in my head that I'm workshopping - something along the lines of "You were worried about them? You should be worried about me." Or "They warned you about Kang? Well Kang is here." I don't know, something like that.
![YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Sneaking [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1ILUps2zDFU/mqdefault.jpg)
I hear people say they should shift from Kang to Doom. I say they should keep Kang because they've set up everything for Kang. They should give Doctor Doom his time to grow and shine... and be scary. Not give him a rush-job.
Not to mention let’s say hypothetically something like this happens under the person who plays Doom, will marvel just drop the entire Doom character? I’m with you 100% let’s finish Kang not rush anything and then bring on the Doom!
Let them finish the Kang story and at the of his story give us a teaser of Doom.
Exactly, a rush job will just end up getting Doom to be "Secret invasioned". 😬
Definitely
Agree, Doom need his own Arc his own story have him tease if they adapt a Battle World like event as a variant who took advantage of the incursions and build his own world from all of that but still Kang is the big bad till the end of this Saga
My biggest bummer with all of the Jonathan Majors drama (with regards to the MCU) is that he was such an engaging actor and really made an impact with his portrayals. Casting Colman Domingo as Final Kang would certainly assuage any doubt in my head. He was incredible in Euphoria
Yeah, I really enjoyed his performance. It's a bummer but I think they had to do it.
I'm generally for giving people second chances and divorcing ones actions from ones art and all but we can talk about that in 10 or 20 years. This is too fresh.
He is incredible. He’ll be back.
@@G0rgaryea… choose your women more wisely… than people that will attack you and chase you down the street
@@TheCriticalArchitect he’ll never get another opportunity like Kang in a dozen movies and shows again. Hit job
@@G0rgar10 20 years ? Wtf ? He didn’t kill anybody! RDJ Josh brolin and Hawkeye all had controversial past and nobody gives a damn smh
I think it’s pretty important that marvel continues the storyline that they are on, so their best option would probably be to recast Kang, instead of switching it up and finding another villain.
I think they are slowly going the DC path in their movies.
I would believe you, but then again thier track record recently has been CRAPPY, so I don't think they would do anything that good...but who knows????
How about cast a more comic version of Kang
50 cent could pull off the kang role !!!
@@PoisonousRakunwtf does that mean? Marvel is a decade ahead of DC morally and visually lmao. DC is so addicted to conservativism they didn't want to do CYBORG let alone Justice League Q or Ivy x Harley
I honestly think they should have multiple ppl play Kang moving forward!!!
Reports say they’re only bringing back one variant
That’s actually not a bad idea
🥸🥸🥸🧐🧐🧐
That would be a good strat I think .
Yeah because he has variants so they can change his look with almost anybody or any creature they can do Alot with this …if they decided to do so
Good idea but I doubt they wanna spend that kind of money
BIG RESPECT TO NEW ROCKSTARS for the integrity to not comment on Majors until after the verdict! Thank you for showing real class!
Well 😂he could’ve said he was acquitted of 2 charges & found guilty of the lesser charges 😂😂 just saying Lead with a positive instead of the negative first .
There’s no integrity here, NR was just covering their butts.
@@onearmedarsenalIt didn’t stop other people from running stories about Majors. It would have been easy for them to offer carefully worded commentary, but they didn’t. I believe in giving praise where it’s due.
@@Bigsemaj4kDo you really see a more positive crime in what he did? It was all pretty bad. Harassment and Assault are no joke.
@@onearmedarsenal it’s not covering their butts. It’s doing exactly what he said not commenting on speculation until the case came to a close. Innocent until proven guilty. I wish other media outlets and “news” sources would do the same.
You guys are the first you tube channel that hasn’t spoken or covered the case of majors and I respect you guys even more now. Thank you rockstars for keeping it real. Mad respect
I like how you explained making the Prime Kang different then all others kangs. Makes sense an older kang would look different than younger kang.
That would make sense to watch Jonathan Mayer's a plead go through. He gets his job back. He becomes Kang again and then Coleman get tired before it majors comes back and Coleman also becomes Kang an old er Kang
@@Mr.INEVITABLE55Majors is not coming back because condoning real world violence shouldn't be anyone's priority especially a multi billion dollar company.
@@nailinthefashion watch him come back. I'm not saying he can't. I'm just saying watch watch what happens if his plea goes through
But the character is bad to begin with
@@nailinthefashionself defense is not violence but nice try
You really handled the Majors trial responsibly, thanks for showing people how its done.
I just wish marvel had handled it the same way
I was going to write the same thing. I unfollowed so many IG pages based on comics/MCU for their poor inconsiderate handling of the situation.
@@aliengranpa They did handle it responsibly. Marvel waited for the verdict and when he was found guilty they dropped him.
@@Supherodude
Looking at what he plead guilty to and watching him run like that in that video. It definitely wasn't handled responsibly and this screams hit job. You have the right to retrieve your property with force. This wasn't a DV case this was Buck breaking.
All Majors had to do in that interview was say, "I condemn Hamas and I stand with Israel unconditionally" Watch how fast he would be forgiven and back in Hollywood and Marvel movies before you could do a Thanos infinity gauntlet "fingersnap" Sadly, you have to play the game in Hollywood. Jonathan stay silent which was the worst advice he was given.
If Loki's variants come in different forms why can't others too?
Thanks for this. I've appreciated how delicately you have handled the Majors situation and this was a perfect way to wrap it all up.
I feel sorry for Jonathan Majors. I feel even worse for us Marvel fans, we’ve fallen in love with the actor and the character(s) and we were looking forward on seeing him in the MCU going forward.
8:53 I definitely think Marvel should continue w/ the Kang storyline rather than pivoting to another villain. 8:32 They did kinda shoot themselves in the foot by showing Jonathan Majors playing every version of Kang in the Council of Kangs tho.
Imo that could be explained by them being one faction of Kangs. There could easily be a hierarchy of councils, which leads our thinking into understanding Doom's hierarchy on Battleworld as well.
So Majors' Kang collected all the ones with a similar brain pattern to himself, Rama Tut creates other Rama Tut variants and those get sprinkled into other councils depending on their strengths.
That could be a fun work around but my intuition says they're gonna do something more vague like "oh that's cute you thought those were the only ones, I have lots more pets" that way post Secret Wars they can still do a bunch w him
@@nailinthefashion I unfortunately think you're right 😭 Marvel will squander this one and not get into great detail lmaoo
For me it's not that much of an issue, besides this isn't the first time the MCU has re-casted a canon character(Rhodey and everyone else) I'm okay with it as long as Kang remains, he's seriously underrated as a villain.
I still believe JM doesn't deserve this
Biased judgement.
@@brady50429🙄 did you see the trial
@@brady50429 and you’re not?
@@brady50429and how did you come to the conclusion you did?
@@MShot98 Are you serious lol? Majors is done I'm living in reality. Y'all are living in a fantasy world.
When a RUclipsr who covers comic book movies has more journalistic integrity than every major news outlet.
Eric you are a treasure! Thank you and the team for this awesome coverage.
Majors is so damn good at playing that role. I don't think anyone can truly compare
Domingo as kang sounds awesome he even wants to be a villain I would love that or doctor doom either way I’m down.
Not doctor doom he hasn’t been set up like Kang has
@@jedipadwan20 yeah but if you have him in the fantastic 4 film and tease him in doctor strange and don’t mess it up it might work but I could be wrong we both don’t know until it happens
Definitely not rocking with disney for them dropping Majors. They’ve made bad business decisions for money and it didn’t play out well for them. Dropping a good actor won’t change that.
They should've kept Majors.
They should absolutely keep Majors. The serious charges were dropped. There are MCU actors dealing with a lot more serious stuff. If their "standards" are that high, they shouldn't work with anyone in Hollywood.
Agreed. 100%. I won’t watch anyone else as Kang. This is silly.
@@TheCriticalArchitect if you have the chance, go on social media & let Marvel know. With enough pressure maybe they'd keep him. They brought back Gunn...
You can’t film a movie from jail
@@rebeccakravitz7711 for a misdimeanor? 😂 Do you read anything other than the headlines?
I actually respect yall a lot for not talking about the trial during it.. too many pages were tryna cover everything (nerdom pages) like why.. tryna say he’s innocent or this and that when there was literally no verdict yet.. it was so weird
This is the first explanation that makes me believe recasting Kang could work. They have to either be all in or all out on Kang.
Dropping the character of Kang would be the most dumb thing marvel could possibly do at this point. Destroys any continuity moving forward, ruins the lead up to avengers 5, and wouldn’t give a character like Dr Doom the proper depth and lead up they deserve. Plus it would set the precedent that if an actor in the future were to f up, they would drop that character - what if the actor for Dr Doom gets convicted of something midway through their story? Do they then just completely drop Dr Doom as a character? Keeping and recasting Kang gives them a chance to set a precedent for how they deal with these issues in the future.
Except for that pesky clause in his contract that he is the only actor to be Kang. Unless there's another clause that states legal issues negates first clause, their hands are tied.
@ghiggs8389 Of course, there's an "unless" clause. It's pretty common knowledge that any actor working under Disney signs some sort of upstanding moral character agreement. He broke that agreement. There is absolutely no way that Marvel and Disney don't have a well thought out contingency plan for each and every one of their actors.
The fact that you held off on speculating on the JM trial and then explained why after his trial had reached its verdicts are the very reasons I hold you guys in such high regard moreso than other RUclips channels and even most actual news outlets.
Your comments around reporting on entertainment news shows why this channel is so successful - thoughtful, intelligent and a very articulate
Just want to say I appreciate your ethical approach to the Jonathan Majors story. Obviously, as MCU fans, we want to know what’s going on, but it’s important that we’re getting good information. And people on the internet farming for clicks and attention are NOT good sources of information.
Huge respect for what you said about covering the trial.
I appreciate the care and attention in covering this casting matter.
NR definitely would have lost me, and everyone I recommend, if the teams approached this recklessly.
Jonathan is completely innocent, fans want him back and Marvel Studios must rehire. Domingo can play any other role, Kang belongs to Jonathan Majors.
Really appreciate your commitment to good journalistic practices. Keep it up!
It seems like they're going for a recast, which seems like the smartest option. Quick and easy enough to move on from this Jonathan majors situation.
Respect you so much for the way the channel has handled discussion around this case. Thank you and the world could use more of this.
Thank you, thank you, thank you for pointing out the importance of journalistic integrity and influencers trying to sway public opinion!! Too many in our society base what they think on what other people tell them to think instead of thinking for themselves!
I really do appreciate your guys integrity as a channel. I know it's comics and pop culture for the most part but what this world really needs y'all always deliver in spades........ transparency
I respect your humility and integrity in wanting to do journalism well and not feeling socially pressured into saying something about which you don't have all the facts for. Thank you! I wish more organizations and celebrities and people would do this for all topics.
Thank you for being so careful about how you've covered this. I wish we had more of that kind of restraint in the industry.
As someone who works for a news station, I applaud your journalistic integrity! When talking about the crime say, allegedly, accused or claims.
I’m glad you’re back! Congrats on the baby
Crazy, a comic book RUclips channel has more journalistic integraty that 90% or most "news" outlets
Thanks for this informative video. I learned a lot about journalism and how Marvel and Hollywood works.
I am glad everything always reported on it and updated us. I agree with a previous comment to use different people for Kang.
Best person to replace him with is John Boyega!!! After seeing they cloned Tyrone and never realizing he was Fontaine until weeks later when I randomly googled the cast, he can definitely pull it off! That boy can act for real, and can definitely pull off the look without skipping a beat!!!!
THANK YOU for being ultra responsible about how you handled Jonathan Majors!! You truly ROCK!!
Coleman is cinema excellence and so is Majors. I have a hard time transitioning to Coleman as Kang because Jonathon seal that role and he IS Kang. This one is a hard one for me.
I’m glad you spoke about the journalism angle of this! Glad to talk about the future of the MCU but we have to do it in an ethical and smart way!
Thank you for maintaining journalistic integrity.
Rehire Jon Majors for Kang and keep this ish moving…
Didn’t they break this tradition though by recasting William Hurt’s character? He is a major character I feel like since he was a big part of the start of the civil war.
Thankyou for holding a higher standard in regards to Majors case
Your integrity as a journalist has made me a bigger fan.
I appreciate your approach with respect to journalism. Shows integrity and I respect your ongoing reporting for it.
I appreciate how you and RS handled this.
your explanation on journalism coverage was spot on and very important 🎯
Love this episode, very educational and informative
Now im not supporting what Majors did i just find it funny how Disney and Marvel will drop Majors for what he did even though the people who run Disney behind the scenes have undoubtedly done worse in their lives im just saying its kinda hypocritical now with that said Majors made his choices and will have to live with them
I feel like it’s too early for Doctor Doom, he should be the villain for the next saga. I wouldn’t mind Coleman being the recasted Kang. Hell maybe even make Green Goblin the villain
I will say though I'm not fully engaged in this drama, I will say you and your team did an excellent job covering this mess. You were always neutral which helped me be neutral when emotions could easily be swayed by the masses 💪 Great Job!
3:09 i appreciate the transparency and integrity!
Best discussion i have watched about this topic. Kudos to the team!
I would still love Denzel Washington as Kang. An old ultimate Kang
Michael Richards would be good
Hell no. He’s not right for it
So glad to hear there is a journalist... you... who holds themselves to a moral and ethical standard... even calling out your colleagues who do not do the same.
Love your (and the NR team’s) honesty on the Major’s topic. I was actually wondering why you were quiet the past year. But understand it now and VERY much appreciate it!
"Well, that's the beautiful thing about Kang in the comics. He is defeated a lot. In fact, it's almost comedic how often he loses. The scary thing is that he's not defined by his failure, and he can keep coming back stronger and stronger," Loveness argued. "It's not like you can just blow up the mothership, just beat him once and you're done. He is almost an existential threat, and the more you fight him the worse he's going to get."
Came for the discussion, stayed for the explainer on the history of hollywood/major studios’ casting strategy and approaches
I just want an OLD Kang, aka Rama-Tut, played by Christopher Judge. Just imagine Teal’c aka the God of War, playing an old POWERFUL Kang.
Oh shiiiit that would be good!
Thank you!
Coleman would be a good villain for the MCU
Major respect (pun intended) to NR for their take on reporting news
One hour club!!! Fr tho I love y'all's work, once again a great video. Keep it up!!!
The actor playing Manta in aquaman is a good choice since the old DCU has ended.
I think Coleman Domingo would kill it in that role, maybe even better than Majors would have. Majors is good but sometimes he plays things too big, Coleman feels more natural. He also looks similar enough to him that it could be more believable that maybe he was a descendant or maybe the original "Kang". The Kangs also didn't all look alike in the comics so they really should take advantage of the multiverse by having others play all different characters.
_The Kangs also didn't all look alike in the comics_
This is a mess. Two seasons of Loki and one movie that was a flop and yes - they did all look alike, period.
Marvel thinking they can paper over this is DCU level - babies in the microwave and Cavil refusing to shave his moustache level dumb. It's MODOK level dumb. It's that bad.
Im not on Johnathan majors side at all...but how has ezra miller managed to dodge everything and still gets to play the flash?
They should have an younger Kang, Older Kang and Elder Kang.
I liked the bit about the actors contracts and the number of movies they will be in!
i really wanted jonathan majors to be kang , i just loved his devotion
Much respect for not covering anything about the Jonathan Majors trial while it was all still speculation. Lesser channels would have covered it (and clickbaited it) for the deluge of engagement
Props to y’all for having journalistic integrity. We were all curious but there’s so much misinformation today and I appreciate this channel for being objective. Love you guys!
I appreciate your integrity!
I really agree with this Kang recast.
Jonathan majors was a terrible Kang
When asked about popular rumors that he would be replacing Majors as Kang the Conqueror, he replied, "I don't know, right now... I'm always looking at what I have to do right now... I know there's talk and conversations around, and I don't know how much is true. I don't even get that from my team. I can't tell if it's true or not."
Domingo added, "The fans are passionate. Somehow my name is out there in the world. I like the idea of just having your name called and someone speaking lovingly and kindly about something is a beautiful thing."
Thank you
Love you guys!
I was so excited to see JM play Kang. He was great in Loki.
Just to clarify what you said there is only sentencing for the reckless assault charge the harassment charge is not a crime but a violation. It holds the same weight as a speeding ticket.
If you think about it, Kang wanted to control time and time lines, and in a way, Majors did just that... he changed the entire direction of the MCU. Majors, like Kang, affected TIME!! You might say he embodies the character he plays too well.
Recasting Kang is going to be akin to recasting Gellert Grindelwald. 😂😂😂
Great take!!!
Lang is major’s role. If he stay low key for a year. Come back and go full Conqueror
I think they should keep Johnathan.
No
They should have just kept Jonathan. It was self defense, if you looked at the evidence
But disney doesn't see it that way. As long as the word "guilty" is written and mentioned with his name. They won't bring him back.
Literally. Based on the evidence and the specific charges he was found “guilty” of it was literally self defense
Even though I don’t think he’ll ever do it, I think Denzel really would be a amazing final Kang
I think you could have Coleman Domingo would be a great choice as a kang replacement. They could say that this kang is from further in the future and is the strongest kang and any other variants could be older versions, like the councle of kangs seen in quantimana could have been the past and it took so long that they aged 20 years
Justice for Jonathan major
Thank you for calling out the fact that its dangerous for influencers and bloggers with no background in journalism try to "report" on these cases. they do more harm than good, spreading misinformation and bias
I’m glad NR took the high road during the trial. I try not to waste my time on speculation if I’m not personally involved. I think we all had a feeling he was going to be found guilty to some degree. Thanks NR to sticking with basic facts on this one 🙂
Hard no to a story pivot. There are near infinite kangs so having the best of them played by a handful of actors would be wise and safer ground for Disney going forward.
Jonathan doesn’t deserve this🤦🏾♂️
A conviction would say otherwise.
@@brady50429Mans is innocent. Self defense and harsh charges was dropped. A “conviction “ shouldn’t rule out everything that is real life.
@@Pic-Rick Disney has dropped him it's time you should as well.
The stupidest possible thing Marvel could do would be to drop the character of Kang and do a rush job on someone like Dr Doom. They need to finish this storyline and commit to the character, otherwise they ruin any continuity going forward and set the precedent for themselves that they should throw a character and entire storyline in the garbage if any actors in the future are in a similar situation.
I think they should use him, I have a line in my head that I'm workshopping - something along the lines of "You were worried about them? You should be worried about me." Or "They warned you about Kang? Well Kang is here." I don't know, something like that.
0:06 Fun fact Good Morning America is owned by Disney and they just interviewed him and he plans to return
You had me at Colman Domingo!