Experimental setup & saturation current: photoelectric effect | Dual nature of light | Khan Academy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
  • Let's explore how to measure the no. of photoelectrons emitted per second experimentally, in photoelectric effect. We will also draw a graph of the photocurrent vs anode potential.
    Khan Academy is a nonprofit organization with the mission of providing a free, world-class education for anyone, anywhere. We offer quizzes, questions, instructional videos, and articles on a range of academic subjects, including math, biology, chemistry, physics, history, economics, finance, grammar, preschool learning, and more. We provide teachers with tools and data so they can help their students develop the skills, habits, and mindsets for success in school and beyond. Khan Academy has been translated into dozens of languages, and 15 million people around the globe learn on Khan Academy every month. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, we would love your help!
    Donate here: www.khanacadem...
    Created by Mahesh Shenoy

Комментарии • 38

  • @thanishas5215
    @thanishas5215 2 года назад +42

    It is surprising that his videos are getting only few views😔.....what else we need...i literally say that he is the no.1 of the best tutors i have ever seen....he makes me to love each and every part of physics....
    Thank you so much sir for ur videos...🙇‍♀️🙇‍♀️

  • @hammadkhan5264
    @hammadkhan5264 Год назад +22

    I didn't like physics but when I take physics lectures of khan academy, especially with this guy it changed my mind and now I like the physics most❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @parahumour4619
    @parahumour4619 2 года назад +21

    I love this method of teaching in which you make u figure out stuff by ourselves. Each video feels like a video game level...this channel deserves so much more views

  • @harinimalla1647
    @harinimalla1647 4 месяца назад +1

    once again you make the statement true that
    '' a good teacher can make a topic more interesting "
    'thank you, sir🙏

  • @juliandesens
    @juliandesens Год назад +3

    Thank you for making the graph! It helped tremendously!

  • @Vijaykumar369S
    @Vijaykumar369S 2 года назад +4

    Hatts off you sir....very good and it's easy to understand.....do more video in all concepts

  • @the_kingdomseekers
    @the_kingdomseekers 6 месяцев назад +1

    This guy’s excitement gets me excited to learn physics

  • @Bill-xn9tp
    @Bill-xn9tp 5 месяцев назад +1

    Very helpful. Great presentation. Beautiful.

  • @AnjiAnji-mh2qr
    @AnjiAnji-mh2qr 16 дней назад

    Sir You are the only reason for my good scores and bringing interest in physics ❤😭

  • @kabirsethi2608
    @kabirsethi2608 3 года назад +4

    Very well explained sir

  • @halumgrr
    @halumgrr 2 года назад +4

    As we increase the voltage, the collector receives more electron per second and also they're being attracted with much greater force than before(because of more voltage), so the electrons should be received and circulating in the circuit quicker than before, shouldn't that result in higher circuit current regardless of the fact that we cannot increase the no. of electrons received per second anymore? ( therefore no thing as saturation current). What point am I missing?

    • @jerven1128
      @jerven1128 2 года назад +2

      i think that, even though the electrons are circulating quicker than before in the circuit, the current should still depend on how fast they travel through the air gap between the emitter and the collector, for ex if 100 electrons go from the +ive terminal to the emitter and the incident photons just have enough energy to emit 10 photoelectrons from the emitter, it will take 10 seconds for them to pass that gap and get to the -ive terminal, thus restricting the current to 10e/s even though the potential was enough to move 100 electrons.
      that sort of makes sense i guess????

    • @rishavjain5087
      @rishavjain5087 Год назад +1

      Path is broken dude ..the circuit is open...when u got the first batch of e- , they returned to the Zn plate....and can only pop out if they got energy from photons... Experiment's pretty full proof

  • @ManojKumar-xk1wp
    @ManojKumar-xk1wp Год назад +1

    we are increasing the potential the electrons speed also increases ,since i=nq/t u are saying n becomes constant but that does not mean q/t is constant then why current is getting saturation value

  • @flip726
    @flip726 Месяц назад

    Why does increasing the voltage increase the current here? Is it because you can treat it as a circuit and Ohm's law applies?

  • @arhamdugar396
    @arhamdugar396 6 месяцев назад

    i have a question
    by increasing the voltage, we have decreased the work function and increased the kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectrons so why does photocurrent become constant and does not increase as velocity of electrons will increase with increase in potential difference?

  • @lifeuncut4538
    @lifeuncut4538 6 месяцев назад

    Awesome teaching

  • @nottheinsomnia
    @nottheinsomnia 2 года назад +1

    Thank you Mahesh bhaiyaa .

  • @literallyfantastic2144
    @literallyfantastic2144 2 года назад +2

    Hey I love you.

  • @Diya-kb5uv
    @Diya-kb5uv Месяц назад

    Wow...true help for us 16 yo who have a big JEE ahead🙃

  • @newman8284
    @newman8284 3 года назад +1

    great explanation

  • @procrastinatingproductivel2031
    @procrastinatingproductivel2031 10 месяцев назад

    damn thank you sm

  • @rajamajeed5257
    @rajamajeed5257 7 месяцев назад

    Best teacher...no worries ❤

  • @tendi.rutsate
    @tendi.rutsate Год назад

    Thank you so much wow!

  • @dravikumar4401
    @dravikumar4401 Год назад

    Here, in saturation current topic we have seen photon ejected almost all the electrons
    Then it must have efficiency like more than 90% right but why the efficiency of photoelectric effect is nearly 0.1%?

  • @selin4393
    @selin4393 9 месяцев назад

    Thank you

  • @sitcomshorts8749
    @sitcomshorts8749 2 года назад

    If electrons are collected using voltage that would result in more electron that is to say the pulling out of electron would not be impartial to light now.

  • @divy_maurya
    @divy_maurya Год назад

    Wow, amazing

  • @okellokennedy6048
    @okellokennedy6048 Год назад

    By setting up a pd (the collector being positive with respect to emitter)

  • @sainidhikarthikeyan2291
    @sainidhikarthikeyan2291 Год назад

    Actually speaking, saturation current/e gives the number of photoelectrons/sec right?

  • @VG__
    @VG__ 2 года назад

    6:25 saturation current

  • @xiaoruiwang4545
    @xiaoruiwang4545 9 месяцев назад

    excellent

  • @naveenmydur9724
    @naveenmydur9724 3 года назад

    Well explained

  • @electroniciit9304
    @electroniciit9304 Год назад

    what if the photoelectrons are just coming out with no kinetic energy . will the system still detect photoelectrons .

  • @shahusardar2762
    @shahusardar2762 2 года назад

    Thank youu

  • @muneerkhan1176
    @muneerkhan1176 3 года назад

    Collector is which metal sir.

  • @fragon8188
    @fragon8188 Год назад

    Fang-tastic 🔥

  • @katyayani5643
    @katyayani5643 Год назад +2

    anyone from 23 batch?