This again is so cool! I wrote 37 video games for Tandy Corporation from StarBlaze through Robocop, Predator and Tetris in the 80's and early 90's. I recently donated all of my Color Computers and accessories to the Oklahoma Historical Society / OKPOP museum as I've been inducted into the museum for the video games i wrote. This brings back so many wonderful memories of working with Mark Seigel and Srini Vasan of Tandy Corporation in developing these game during the 80's and early 90's! Many, many thanks! Greg
This was my first computer when I was 10 year old. It began my love for computers and programming and 35 years later still remember this with fondness, wish I hadn't of thrown it out when I upgraded to the CoCo 3.
Surprisingly, there is more (and better) accessories now for the MC-10 than there ever was from Tandy back in the day. You can see some at bottom of the page here: thezippsterzone.com/hardware/. A composite video out board, a Supercart (with 512K each of SRAM and Flash memory, a sound chip, and 2 joystick ports), and the MCX-128 (128K RAM, 16K ROM socket (which includes MCX BASIC, which expands Microcolor BASIC to support high res graphics commands like the Coco Extended BASIC does, almost 32K RAM for BASIC programs (Tandy maxed out at 20K), and also allows a Drivewire like functionality called Emcee server, so that you can load programs from your PC using a serial cable (the same cable as the Coco Drivewire uses, so you can share one cable with both systems). Software has also improved over the past decade or two; Jim Gerrie has put up hundreds of BASIC games and programs up for free download, and ports of Pacman, Flappy Bird, Space Invaders and others (written in assembly) have been done. But the keyboard still sucks, and the graphics are somewhat crippled in that Tandy designed the hardware so that the VDG chip can only use the onboard 4K of RAM, which means you can't use the highest graphics modes the the VDG can support without modifying the motherboard itself. (You can see some videos of some of the better games (unfortunately with an overly loud drum track over top the actual game sounds) here: ruclips.net/video/CbcSPQ56yyU/видео.html
Kudos on commenting this Curtis. These guys here went on 'minimal effort' to script the video article, does more of a disservice to the hardware showcased here.
I do agree that there is no modern KB upgrade... But little demand as you can develop on an emulator on your laptop and then load on the real machine to use.
This was my first computer. I remember picking it up from Radio Shack with my mom and dad. I learned a load of basic with this. I would pick up Hot Coco magazines from the corner store and type in the code all night long and then play the game. Then I was writing my own games. I still have it and I will never let it go. 10 CLS
I had one. I wrote a battleship game that connected two of them together by way of the cassette port. Each player had their own MC-10 and screen and would play their side of the game out of view of their opponent. It was a fun project that I don't think was ever duplicated.
What was awesome about this machine was that it was simple enough to understand completely. There was a fully annotated ROM disassembly and using poke commands, you could build on that with machine language, make os calls, and do all kinds of direct machine control. There were community magazines and support that made a mediocre product into a great introductory computing experience.
I had one of these back in the day. I found $100 in a parking lot and after waiting 10 minutes to see if anyone came looking for it, I used it to buy a TRS-80 MC-10! The only thing I did with it was write some basic programs. I wish I had kept it...
I still have mine somewhere in my parents' house, complete with the 16k ram module and a program cassette of "Lost World Pinball"--yes there was at least one game that Tandy made for the MC-10, and it was pretty fun to play. I probably kept a few of my pitiful attempts at BASIC programs in my box o' cassettes; it would be interesting to digitally archive those tapes in Audacity and see if they can still be read.
The MC-10 was my first computer that my father gave me for my 13th birthday in 1984. I learned programming on it and even translated many games from other systems C64/MSX/BBC-B (mostly text based) to my mc-10. This small computer started my career in the Oracle/SQL Database world.
As with others here, this was my first computer in my early teens. A gift from my great aunt, I used the death out of it until I finally moved up to the CoCo 2. That 16K upgrade module got hot as hell though!
Like several others here, this was my first computer as well. I remember wanting the Atari 800 so badly for the longest time since that's what we were using in my math class. I kept begging for a computer for a long time but my parents kept telling me they're too expensive. I'd have to visit friends to use theirs, and watch as they all got TI/99-4a's, VIC-20's and eventually the legendary C64. Finally, in November for my 13th birthday I got my own computer! The mighty TRS-80 MC-10. It was none of those other machines but at least it was mine. A month later for Christmas I got the 16K expansion pack! So I really warmed up to it and created 5 games in BASIC, a lottery number picker, a word processor and a BUNCH little nerdy tests and "demos" on that thing! It was some of the most fun I've had growing up, although I'd still visit friends with envy. hehehe Now, I own 4 of them in my vintage collection! Nostalgia is powerful!
@@MrJmack46 Sinclair Research was a small company, not IBM. What they achieved was more miraculous than colossal failure. IMHO. Clive achieved a knighthood from this success.
I owned one as a teenager. "Don't turn it off, I'll lose all my work!" I used to buy Modern Computing and enter lines of code all night just to see if it would work.
was my first computer with the 16k addon. i would spend hours typing in a game from rainbow magazine, and then hours finding typos. i was disappointed, and frustrated with it, and it became a dust collector replaced with a vic-20
This was my first ever home microcomputer, I bought it as an entry level computer. Used it for a few years then later bought a Sinclair ZX Spectrum+. Still have the TRS 80 MC10 and sold the Sinclair ZX Spectrum+ in the late 1980s.
My first computer ever, so of course I thought it was fantastic. I wrote amazing programs for it, and I was sorely disappointed that they disappeared from the stores soon after that.
Very cool to see all the comments from folks for whom this was their first computer and got them started in programming. My first computer was the original Coco 1, and getting it I'm sure was a bit of a stretch for my folks. If this had been around at the time I expect I would have been happy for them to opt for something less expensive like this.
Greetings from Colombia, I have one and it is very good, what happens is that you have to compare it in its niche market and with those parameters it was one of the best. Also today there is a large community that continues to create programs and new modern hardware devices that make it more functional, you should investigate more.
I have one of these, a PAL version, boxed. Almost the same inside, except it's far easier to convert to composite. Just announced, is the new MCX unit, that gives and extra 32K RAM, and the full version of extended BASIC, several 8K banks of flash RAM, and the ability to load and save, to an SD card. It makes it just about identical to my Dragon 32, although with more RAM
This was my first computer, so it has special memories for me. Typing a basic program whole afternoon to get a "?syntax error in 10" in the first run... those were the times... My dad had a model 1, I still have the data recorder.
That computer was also sold in France (under license) as the Matra Alice... It failed there too with only 20,000 units being sold. That computer was candidate for the Plan Informatique pour Tous but didn't get selected, the Thomsons MO5 did instead
I went to Radio Shack alot in the late 70s till the early 90s when all they tried to do was sell you cell phones. It wasnt the same store after 1997. I never remember seeing this computer at all when I went in. I actually worked twice for them part time I. The early 90s and then again in 1996. The store I worked for in 96 was still an old looking store with that 80s woodgrain look. I worked for them for about 6 months or a little more I cant exactly remember it was my part time job I worked in the evenings after working all day at my fulltime job. However by 96 all the Tandy branded stuff was gone and the computers were IBM Aptivas by then. I miss my radio shack from the 1980s.
This was my firs computer when I was 13 or 14 years old (here in Australia)! I had the 16kb expansion and wrote an adventure game (with music!) on it. I loved they keys, wish I kept it.
This was my first computer at 16 years old. I loved it - upgraded to a Coco2 - but really was sorry to get rid of it... I learned BASIC on it and used it a LOT.
Yep, my first computer. My older brother bought it for us. Wrote my first program in BASIC on it, and boy I had a lot of misconceptions. I remember one time tearing my hair out because my program wouldn't work right, and it was because I was putting IF statements on the same line separated by colons. :)
The MC-10 was my 1st computer. Taught myself Basic with it as a teen. Games, ie Egg Drop with square eggs, lol. I still have it with the 4" printer, 16k Ram mod and tapes. Nice blast from the past.
My first comp was the Alice. I (really) had a lot of fun with it (usually greeting it with a "CLS:REM bonjour"), and the manual was good (on the French version we had a cover illustration by late illustrator Moebius, picturing a futuristic Alice character ; we were diving into a rabbit hole, after all ^^). Like many I learned a lot from magazines, and I noticed I could type with virtually no modifications BASIC programs made for VIC-20 and Dragon-32 : They seemed to run the same Microsoft BASIC :-) Later I had the 16k RAM extension, with a little booklet about undocumented features (and I think CSAVEM was part of them) and the basics of machine language with a few example, including graphics modes not available in BASIC (because the BASIC working memory was just after the screen memory, so a higher resolution would mess with the BASIC) Still have it, and will run it again when I get an old small TV set :-)
This was my first computer also. I learned basic by using the keyboard hints, and today - I have achieved quite a bit in my computer career, all due to the inspiration and intimacy with the right sized computer for me at the time. Thanks for your videos, definitely a blast from my past - I had the coco 2 and the coco3 afterward, I had high anticipation for the 128k of memory on the unit, but was probably most disappointed in it the 68B09E processors enhancements... Apple stole my heart and then IBM compatibles.
I went from this, to the coco, to the Model 4, to the Tandy 1000, and from there on I had to go beyond Radio Shack. When I had the MC-10 I also had a 300 baud modem that I would use to go on BBSs and other services. And like many others here, I learned Basic and Machine languages starting with this little machine. All that said, my favorite of the Radio Shack line was the Model 4.
I never knew anyone who had a Radio Shack computer. The only computers I had at home growing up were a Commodore 64 and my dad's Compaq. While the Commodore 64 was a fine computer, I secretly wished I could have had a lot of different computers to play with, because they were all so unique.
It was my first home computer in 1986 but not the first computer I ever used. The first computer I had used was in grade school in 1984 and it was the TRS-80 model 4. I was mostly disappointed with the MC-10 since it only had 4K of ram. I didn't have the 16K ram expander unfortunately. A lot of the programs I typed in from books wouldn't work due to the amount of ram it had. Some of them did work from time to time. It wouldn't be until years later that I would have an MC-10 with the 16K ram expander and got some of those programs working.
It was the first computer I ever owned. I spent hours typing in and creating BASIC programs. What I had at the time was what I could earn as a kid. My parents were not supportive of my interests. From there, Color Computer 2. So much better and soon after a disk drive. I got the family Sony Trinitron when it was replaced with a projection TV. SO clear and nice for the CoCo2. From there, incremental growth and expansion. OS9 and programming in assembly. When Linux became a thing, I found myself rejecting Windows/PC in favor of something that made a lot more sense and OS9 led the way.
My first computer was a Texas Instrument with 1k internal ram and a 4k expansion which my old man had bought for himself first. My first true useful computer was the CoCo 2 and I also got an MC-10 followed a few years later by the CoCo 3.💖 I love the CoCo trilogy even though I ended up owning the last 2 of that line. And using the MC-10 was a joyful experience as well.
It might have been acceptable going up against a VIC-20 with a datasette. By the time it arrived, its competition was the C64 with a 1541 drive, and the compactness and price just weren't enough to go head-to-head with the legend.
I think it was brilliant, it was all my parents could afford. It was my first, then went to the TRS80 COCO 2, then Commodore Amiga 128. I learnt Basic and the started ASM with peek and poke codes to add cheats. It was the foot in the door to my career with computers where I am working as an industrial programmer. It was a shame it didn't continue...
I still have my 2 MC10's and I'm 61 years old! I will retire next month and I hope to power them up just because it was the computers that taught me about computers and gave me a wonderful career. One MC-10 I butchered and attached wires from a DP-25 connector to 24 of the keyboard keys. I made a flight stick type joystick and a steering wheel. 10 For X=0 to 100 20 A$ =Y 30 Print CHR$(62) 40 Print CHR$(147) 50 GOTO 10 Darn I forgot how to make a ">" go across the screen this was my bullet... :-(
This is the first computer my brother owned! Either this or a Tandy pocket computer? I wrote a very bad version of breakout on it around 9 or 10 year old. The ball only did a direct reflection when it bounced off the walls paddle or bricks. And the resolution was 1/2 character. I was only able to get a couple aliens on screen at a time for a space shooter. I think this may have been the first computer I used basic on, but my school had Apple IIs so I might have used them first?
Weird comment in the video: serial isn't directly connected to the CPU. ??? The cassette and serial are directly connected to the CPU. There are level converters but that's the norm for RS232. At the time the MC10 was being sold it's biggest problem was the lack of software, the cost, the expandablity and that keyboard. Having said that I do like the 6803 processor, pretty good instruction set. I now have 2 MC10s in my collections (and the MCX128). I plan on trying out the HDMI upgrade and maybe a USB keyboard.
This was actually my first computer. I got one Christmas of ‘84 that my folks paid $50 for new. I learned basic on it, and had a lot of fun, but wound up getting a CoCo2 shortly afterwards.
There actually has been a device, the MCX32-SD, that adds 32 KB RAM, for a total of 36 KB, as well as gives you a better BASIC interpreter, finally with the ability to save machine language, and a version of DOS that works with an SD card, so you don't have to use the cassette interface if you don't want to. It's a very nice little device. Give MCX32-SD a google.
4 года назад+1
I had one, with the expansion pack! Bought it new during the liquidation phase. I think it sold then for 49$ canadian, and the expansion was 19$. Did not use it much. Had put my own cassette deck on it. It sure was a cheap way to get going on BASIC. But zero compatibility with the CoCo software. Too bad... Sold it a long time ago.
The MC-10 doesn't use anything from the original TRS-80 other than similar syntax for it's BASIC. The small size is possible due to the built in functionality of he 6803 microcontroller, and minimal circuitry used. No market? The TS-1000 sold over 1 million machines in year, it's parent the ZX-81 sold 1.5 million machines, and clones may have sold over 1 million units worldwide. Customers disappointed with the TS-1000 may have been a major reason other machines targeting that market in the US didn't sell well. If the MC-10 had been introduced at the same time as the TS-1000, Tandy probably would have sold a million of them. It runs rings around the TS-1000, and it's BASIC is even faster than the Apple II or C64 for a lot of programs. The serial port didn't use the hardware UART, but I won't go as far as saying it was near useless. The MC-10 could connect with serial printers and modems of the day just fine. It should easily handle 2400 baud modems with the right software, and drive a printer at 9600 baud. MCX-BASIC communicates with the PC over the serial port at much higher speeds. The MC-10 has a CLOADM command to load machine language programs, and a CSAVEM was published in a magazine shortly after it's release.
ZX81 (Which was also sold in the US briefly) not ZX80 which was the predecessor to the ZX81. In any case the TS1000 was successful enough in the US to warrant the TS1500 (a 16k version with a better keyboard) and the TS2068 (similar to the ZX Spectrum).
The TS-1000 supposedly sold over a million units in a single year, so I'm not sure I'd call that a failure, but then so many people hated it that it probably killed Timex's future in the market. The Aquarius may have sold (shipped?) even fewer machines than the MC-10, but at least the company released a few games for it. Tandy's launch of the MC-10 could best be described like this... they threw a newborn child into the water and said swim. They released two or three tapes with games, and never did any more with it. Compared to the TS-1000 and Aquarius it was a much more capable machine, but it was too small, too neutered, and too unsupported to succeed. The MC-10 design is a clever engineer's dream, aka a disaster. The keys feel okay but the keyboard is too small to touch type on, the keyboard design complicates reading the keyboard, the memory map prevents BASIC from using much of the address space for RAM even with an external expansion, the video circuit is neutered in multiple ways so you can't use all the 6847 video modes there is enough RAM for let alone use the highest res modes, they reserved room for 16K of ROM in the memory map but only provided a room for a single 8K ROM, and the serial port is a bit banger design that completely ignores the 6803's built in hardware serial port. That's the highlights of my rant on the design.
I had one, it was my first computer. Poke 34343,255 used to crash it nicely 😂 CLOADM & CSAVEM worked on mine, and if not used correctly would generate an ?FM error (file mode)
I bought one at a second hand shop, without knowing what it was. Since then I never managed to power it up, as the power adapter was missing. Anyway I'm glad to have a rare piece in my collection, hopefully I'll find its adapter and make it work again someday 😁 To be honest, it doesn't look bad at all! Who knows, maybe the expansion port can be used to develop some kind of external device, that will make it shine again (or finally?)
In a pinch it'll run off of 6 volts DC. The polarity won't matter. However the cassette won't work powered like this. The missing power supply gives the computer 8 volts AC.
@@emuhill hi, thanks for the info. You meant 6 volts AC right? BTW in the video he says that it doesn't have a CSAVE command, but it looks like it's on the top left part of the keyboard. So it doesn't work or what?
@@Fred_Klingon No I meant 6 volts DC. Yes it will work. And as I said before the cassette won't work. It requires an AC signal to work. But the rest of the computer will work just fine on DC. It has CSAVE. It doesn't have CSAVEM. That's the machine language version of CSAVE. It does have CLOADM though. So you you can load a machine language program. You just can't save it.
@@emuhill I'm a bit confused, you said that polarity doesn't matter, so it should be AC right? Btw sorry, I don't know this computer very well, probably what you're saying will make sense once I try to make it work again.. I'm also not very expert with Basic and tapes, I only collect vintage computers...this one was at about 15€, so I purchased it, without knowing much about it, and the power supply wasn't included
@@Fred_Klingon Let me see if I can explain this a bit better. The computer is designed to work with 8 volts AC. The cassette port requires the 60 Hz line AC in order to function. The computer itself will work on 6 volts DC and as I said the polarity doesn't matter. For most DC applications the polarity does matter. The rectifier is located in the computer itself. So when you run it on DC, you are using only half of the rectifier. You can set the polarity to which ever you like. So if you just want to check the computer out and make sure everything is ok, you can use one of those universal power supplies. I don't recommend any voltage over 8 volts as that is likely to damage the computer.
A friend of mine in Engineering school had an MC-10. Since I had a Coco3, I was pretty familiar with MC-10 Basic. I did some programming work for him. Had the MC-10 been just a "little" better, it would have been more successful.
The purpose behind these computers was cost, not size. No one back in those days bought one because it was smaller than a Color Computer or TRS-80 Model III. No thought that this was the direction the market was heading. The singular driving feature of these computers was simply cost. There was a race to the bottom (of price), and these computers were in the ~$100 range, which in todays dollars is equivalent to ~$250. What killed these computers was the nearly immediate drop in price of the higher end units like the Color Computer, which, the year the MC-10 came out, a 16k CoCo 2 was $239. People saw the better keyboard and the expandability of the Color Computer 2, and chose it over the MC-10 for those reasons AND the fact that $239 was a price point people were willing to pay. Sinclairs and MC-10s and the like were an experiment to see how low computers could be made, and since both machines were desktop units, the size of the MC-10 was considered a drawback, not a selling point. Also, no one aside from a very niche market even considered the pocket computers of the day, and no one was envisioning the smartphones of today. What killed these units was the fact that physically larger systems that were more capable of typing on like a typewriter, that had more compute capabilities as well, combined with the fact that the larger systems halved in price over the course of the previous year is what killed these computers. More than anything, these super low end computers were a failed expermiment with the market determining where the sweet spot in popularity (thus sales) was at. No one ever considered buying one of these units to run a business or do anything more serious than tinker, or something to buy for their kid. The physical size had NOTHING to do with why these systems were marketed, and people complained about the fact that they were too small. It wasn't the industry trying to create a PDA or handheld type device at all. This video is pretty ridiculous in it's reasoning.
Absolutely right. It was an exercise in cost cutting and had absolutely nothing to do with market direction. Also people seem to have a somewhat romantised view of the MC-10. It's was quite shit at the time, but rather cute.
Saludos desde Colombia, tengo uno y es muy bueno, lo que pasa es que tienes que compararlo en su nicho de mercado y con esos parámetros fue uno de los mejores. Además hoy hay una gran comunidad que sigue creando programas y nuevos dispositivos de hardware modernos que lo hacen más funcional, deberías de investigar más.
Absolutely, if they had somehow shipped before the release of more capable machines and the price war between Commodore and TI it could have done better. I'm surprised it wasn't released in other countries (besides France) with less developed computer markets where it could have done well.
I have only recently heard of it...kind of reminds me of the netbook line we went through a while back. That didn't succeed long term either. But going into it it is easy to see how it might have done better. But alas both machines had too many short comings and not enough benefits to use.
Learning to program. I bought one for $20 from a friend and was so excited. I wanted to learn how to write video games. I wrote all kinds of little games and had a great experience. I didn’t get the manual so I didn’t know the poke codes. If i did that would have been great 😊
I actually programmed one that I input workers hours for each day of the week and it displayed their gross, the Federal and State taxes needed to take out and their net pay. My uncle would pay them from a wad of cash in a envelope and off to the bar they went. I had to write all the numbers from the screen because we never had a printer. It was a step up from doing all the calculations on a TI-55 which had a worker standing their 30 minutes he could tell me his work hours and get his money as fast as my uncle could count it. No checks back then, workers could barely read and write but they knew in their head close to the amount of money they should be paid. With the MC10 they could see the taxes and not feel cheated because a computer did it.
The timex 1000 wasn't a commodore size bit but to call it a colossal failure is untrue. It sold well above expectations. The timex 2069 was a colossal failure. The 1000 was not.
Yes, for the extra $20, the MC-10 was a better system with color, twice as much RAM, better keyboard, a sturdy 16K RAM expander, higher res graphics, a RESET button and a POWER switch.
No modern accessories? Ehrm.... there's a 128k card that fits into the memory expansion connector and expands BASIC as an option at bootup. It can load and save to virtual disks over drive wire server. ruclips.net/video/FXY279q7YNg/видео.html
Yes, but twice the price. For many people the Speccy would be the better choice but for those who couldn't afford the Speccy, the MC-10 was the better choice over the ZX81 / TS1000.
I remember back in 1983 right before I purchased my Atari 800XL. A friend had one of these computers and was trying to sell it to me for only $50. I took it home for a week to play around with it. What a piece of crap. I was glad to return it to my friend, and very glad I purchased the Atari instead. I feel bad for all those kids back in the day that got stuck with the the Tandy MC10, because parents knew nothing about computers and went with the cheapest thing they could find.
Yeah, even a starter system the MC-10 just doesn't make a lot of sense, maybe if it had been released a few years earlier when expectations were lower but there were so many better options
I used my MC-10 for about 1.5 years. After 6 months I bought the 16K RAM expansion.Then I got the opportunity to swap it for a 2nd hand 600XL (16K) that only had Star Raiders and one joystick. But wow, the Atari 600XL had 256 colours and a much larger user base. I still use an Atari 8bit homecomputer in 2020 (playing new/old games on it). I do NOT dislike the MC-10. I have good memories using this tiny computer and still love it.
@@NewsmakersTech That may e true for people who could afford the better computers and/or parents willing to buy it for them. But when all you have is pennies you can't buy the triple digit computers. I picked up my MC-10 when the price dropped to $79. and saved another 2 months for the expansion card. I did get lucky when a friend of mine gave me his Tape drive. I hope I never forget the joy I had with that lil computer. I kept and used it for around three years. until I bought an C64 and (like a fool) took it back a week later for a Plus4. now the Plus/4 was a failed computer.
This again is so cool! I wrote 37 video games for Tandy Corporation from StarBlaze through Robocop, Predator and Tetris in the 80's and early 90's. I recently donated all of my Color Computers and accessories to the Oklahoma Historical Society / OKPOP museum as I've been inducted into the museum for the video games i wrote.
This brings back so many wonderful memories of working with Mark Seigel and Srini Vasan of Tandy Corporation in developing these game during the 80's and early 90's!
Many, many thanks!
Greg
nice! I think Tetris was one of my favorite CoCo 3 games!
@@JoseReyes-ov2tu Thank you very much, I'm glad you enjoyed it!
Greg
This was my first computer when I was 10 year old. It began my love for computers and programming and 35 years later still remember this with fondness, wish I hadn't of thrown it out when I upgraded to the CoCo 3.
Me too! But, I was much older than 10 :)
I think I was 12 when they bought this for me!
same! I gave it away :(
Surprisingly, there is more (and better) accessories now for the MC-10 than there ever was from Tandy back in the day. You can see some at bottom of the page here: thezippsterzone.com/hardware/. A composite video out board, a Supercart (with 512K each of SRAM and Flash memory, a sound chip, and 2 joystick ports), and the MCX-128 (128K RAM, 16K ROM socket (which includes MCX BASIC, which expands Microcolor BASIC to support high res graphics commands like the Coco Extended BASIC does, almost 32K RAM for BASIC programs (Tandy maxed out at 20K), and also allows a Drivewire like functionality called Emcee server, so that you can load programs from your PC using a serial cable (the same cable as the Coco Drivewire uses, so you can share one cable with both systems). Software has also improved over the past decade or two; Jim Gerrie has put up hundreds of BASIC games and programs up for free download, and ports of Pacman, Flappy Bird, Space Invaders and others (written in assembly) have been done. But the keyboard still sucks, and the graphics are somewhat crippled in that Tandy designed the hardware so that the VDG chip can only use the onboard 4K of RAM, which means you can't use the highest graphics modes the the VDG can support without modifying the motherboard itself. (You can see some videos of some of the better games (unfortunately with an overly loud drum track over top the actual game sounds) here: ruclips.net/video/CbcSPQ56yyU/видео.html
That's what I like about today: support for legacy hardware.
Kudos on commenting this Curtis. These guys here went on 'minimal effort' to script the video article, does more of a disservice to the hardware showcased here.
I do agree that there is no modern KB upgrade... But little demand as you can develop on an emulator on your laptop and then load on the real machine to use.
This was my first computer. I remember picking it up from Radio Shack with my mom and dad. I learned a load of basic with this. I would pick up Hot Coco magazines from the corner store and type in the code all night long and then play the game. Then I was writing my own games. I still have it and I will never let it go. 10 CLS
10 CLS(9) lol.
I had one. I wrote a battleship game that connected two of them together by way of the cassette port. Each player had their own MC-10 and screen and would play their side of the game out of view of their opponent. It was a fun project that I don't think was ever duplicated.
You still have the code?
What was awesome about this machine was that it was simple enough to understand completely. There was a fully annotated ROM disassembly and using poke commands, you could build on that with machine language, make os calls, and do all kinds of direct machine control. There were community magazines and support that made a mediocre product into a great introductory computing experience.
I had one of these back in the day. I found $100 in a parking lot and after waiting 10 minutes to see if anyone came looking for it, I used it to buy a TRS-80 MC-10! The only thing I did with it was write some basic programs. I wish I had kept it...
I still have mine somewhere in my parents' house, complete with the 16k ram module and a program cassette of "Lost World Pinball"--yes there was at least one game that Tandy made for the MC-10, and it was pretty fun to play. I probably kept a few of my pitiful attempts at BASIC programs in my box o' cassettes; it would be interesting to digitally archive those tapes in Audacity and see if they can still be read.
The MC-10 was my first computer that my father gave me for my 13th birthday in 1984. I learned programming on it and even translated many games from other systems C64/MSX/BBC-B (mostly text based) to my mc-10. This small computer started my career in the Oracle/SQL Database world.
how did you account for sprites?
As with others here, this was my first computer in my early teens. A gift from my great aunt, I used the death out of it until I finally moved up to the CoCo 2. That 16K upgrade module got hot as hell though!
Like several others here, this was my first computer as well. I remember wanting the Atari 800 so badly for the longest time since that's what we were using in my math class. I kept begging for a computer for a long time but my parents kept telling me they're too expensive. I'd have to visit friends to use theirs, and watch as they all got TI/99-4a's, VIC-20's and eventually the legendary C64. Finally, in November for my 13th birthday I got my own computer! The mighty TRS-80 MC-10. It was none of those other machines but at least it was mine. A month later for Christmas I got the 16K expansion pack! So I really warmed up to it and created 5 games in BASIC, a lottery number picker, a word processor and a BUNCH little nerdy tests and "demos" on that thing! It was some of the most fun I've had growing up, although I'd still visit friends with envy. hehehe
Now, I own 4 of them in my vintage collection! Nostalgia is powerful!
I'm not sure i'd describe a computer that sold 600k units in Sinclair 1000 form and 1.5m units in ZX81 form a "colossal failure".
2.1 million sold X $80 = $160 million For a corporation trying to capture the world market in microcomputers that is a "L"
@@MrJmack46 Sinclair Research was a small company, not IBM. What they achieved was more miraculous than colossal failure. IMHO. Clive achieved a knighthood from this success.
I owned one as a teenager. "Don't turn it off, I'll lose all my work!" I used to buy Modern Computing and enter lines of code all night just to see if it would work.
Let me guess the cassette player failed.
I just got one of these. After finally getting all the right plugs and an old CRT TV I'm about to try programming in 4 Kilobytes.
was my first computer with the 16k addon. i would spend hours typing in a game from rainbow magazine, and then hours finding typos. i was disappointed, and frustrated with it, and it became a dust collector replaced with a vic-20
This was my first ever home microcomputer, I bought it as an entry level computer. Used it for a few years then later bought a Sinclair ZX Spectrum+.
Still have the TRS 80 MC10 and sold the Sinclair ZX Spectrum+ in the late 1980s.
I had one in 1984. First learned BASIC on it. Ah, what memories…
My first computer ever, so of course I thought it was fantastic. I wrote amazing programs for it, and I was sorely disappointed that they disappeared from the stores soon after that.
Very cool to see all the comments from folks for whom this was their first computer and got them started in programming. My first computer was the original Coco 1, and getting it I'm sure was a bit of a stretch for my folks. If this had been around at the time I expect I would have been happy for them to opt for something less expensive like this.
Greetings from Colombia, I have one and it is very good, what happens is that you have to compare it in its niche market and with those parameters it was one of the best. Also today there is a large community that continues to create programs and new modern hardware devices that make it more functional, you should investigate more.
I have one of these, a PAL version, boxed. Almost the same inside, except it's far easier to convert to composite. Just announced, is the new MCX unit, that gives and extra 32K RAM, and the full version of extended BASIC, several 8K banks of flash RAM, and the ability to load and save, to an SD card. It makes it just about identical to my Dragon 32, although with more RAM
The MC10 was my first computer. I was 7 years old. It really changed my life. :)
This was my first computer, so it has special memories for me. Typing a basic program whole afternoon to get a "?syntax error in 10" in the first run... those were the times... My dad had a model 1, I still have the data recorder.
That computer was also sold in France (under license) as the Matra Alice... It failed there too with only 20,000 units being sold.
That computer was candidate for the Plan Informatique pour Tous but didn't get selected, the Thomsons MO5 did instead
I went to Radio Shack alot in the late 70s till the early 90s when all they tried to do was sell you cell phones. It wasnt the same store after 1997. I never remember seeing this computer at all when I went in. I actually worked twice for them part time I. The early 90s and then again in 1996. The store I worked for in 96 was still an old looking store with that 80s woodgrain look. I worked for them for about 6 months or a little more I cant exactly remember it was my part time job I worked in the evenings after working all day at my fulltime job. However by 96 all the Tandy branded stuff was gone and the computers were IBM Aptivas by then. I miss my radio shack from the 1980s.
This was my firs computer when I was 13 or 14 years old (here in Australia)! I had the 16kb expansion and wrote an adventure game (with music!) on it. I loved they keys, wish I kept it.
The first computer I had was an MC-10 (with 16KB RAM expansion module!) back when I was 15. I learned a lot with it.
This was my first computer at 16 years old. I loved it - upgraded to a Coco2 - but really was sorry to get rid of it... I learned BASIC on it and used it a LOT.
Yep, my first computer. My older brother bought it for us. Wrote my first program in BASIC on it, and boy I had a lot of misconceptions. I remember one time tearing my hair out because my program wouldn't work right, and it was because I was putting IF statements on the same line separated by colons. :)
So proud to say...I owned one of these and my Dad, bought it for me for Christmas !!!
The MC-10 was my 1st computer. Taught myself Basic with it as a teen. Games, ie Egg Drop with square eggs, lol. I still have it with the 4" printer, 16k Ram mod and tapes. Nice blast from the past.
My first comp was the Alice. I (really) had a lot of fun with it (usually greeting it with a "CLS:REM bonjour"), and the manual was good (on the French version we had a cover illustration by late illustrator Moebius, picturing a futuristic Alice character ; we were diving into a rabbit hole, after all ^^).
Like many I learned a lot from magazines, and I noticed I could type with virtually no modifications BASIC programs made for VIC-20 and Dragon-32 : They seemed to run the same Microsoft BASIC :-)
Later I had the 16k RAM extension, with a little booklet about undocumented features (and I think CSAVEM was part of them) and the basics of machine language with a few example, including graphics modes not available in BASIC (because the BASIC working memory was just after the screen memory, so a higher resolution would mess with the BASIC)
Still have it, and will run it again when I get an old small TV set :-)
This was my first computer also. I learned basic by using the keyboard hints, and today - I have achieved quite a bit in my computer career, all due to the inspiration and intimacy with the right sized computer for me at the time.
Thanks for your videos, definitely a blast from my past - I had the coco 2 and the coco3 afterward, I had high anticipation for the 128k of memory on the unit, but was probably most disappointed in it the 68B09E processors enhancements... Apple stole my heart and then IBM compatibles.
I went from this, to the coco, to the Model 4, to the Tandy 1000, and from there on I had to go beyond Radio Shack. When I had the MC-10 I also had a 300 baud modem that I would use to go on BBSs and other services.
And like many others here, I learned Basic and Machine languages starting with this little machine.
All that said, my favorite of the Radio Shack line was the Model 4.
Bought one as a hobby, taught myself basic. Was a great way to understand simple computer fundamentals. 4k, can you believe that.
“Maybe someday you could fit a computer in your pocket” a clever sneaky mention of raspberry pi, tablet, and phone computers
I never knew anyone who had a Radio Shack computer. The only computers I had at home growing up were a Commodore 64 and my dad's Compaq. While the Commodore 64 was a fine computer, I secretly wished I could have had a lot of different computers to play with, because they were all so unique.
It was my first home computer in 1986 but not the first computer I ever used. The first computer I had used was in grade school in 1984 and it was the TRS-80 model 4. I was mostly disappointed with the MC-10 since it only had 4K of ram. I didn't have the 16K ram expander unfortunately. A lot of the programs I typed in from books wouldn't work due to the amount of ram it had. Some of them did work from time to time. It wouldn't be until years later that I would have an MC-10 with the 16K ram expander and got some of those programs working.
How do people not look at this guy and think "criminally insane"?
It was the first computer I ever owned. I spent hours typing in and creating BASIC programs. What I had at the time was what I could earn as a kid. My parents were not supportive of my interests. From there, Color Computer 2. So much better and soon after a disk drive. I got the family Sony Trinitron when it was replaced with a projection TV. SO clear and nice for the CoCo2. From there, incremental growth and expansion. OS9 and programming in assembly. When Linux became a thing, I found myself rejecting Windows/PC in favor of something that made a lot more sense and OS9 led the way.
The French clone of the MC-10 started my current carrer... Where most of my friends had C64 to play, I had to code anything I wanted.
My first computer was a Texas Instrument with 1k internal ram and a 4k expansion which my old man had bought for himself first. My first true useful computer was the CoCo 2 and I also got an MC-10 followed a few years later by the CoCo 3.💖
I love the CoCo trilogy even though I ended up owning the last 2 of that line. And using the MC-10 was a joyful experience as well.
It might have been acceptable going up against a VIC-20 with a datasette. By the time it arrived, its competition was the C64 with a 1541 drive, and the compactness and price just weren't enough to go head-to-head with the legend.
I think it was brilliant, it was all my parents could afford. It was my first, then went to the TRS80 COCO 2, then Commodore Amiga 128. I learnt Basic and the started ASM with peek and poke codes to add cheats. It was the foot in the door to my career with computers where I am working as an industrial programmer. It was a shame it didn't continue...
I still have my 2 MC10's and I'm 61 years old! I will retire next month and I hope to power them up just because it was the computers that taught me about computers and gave me a wonderful career. One MC-10 I butchered and attached wires from a DP-25 connector to 24 of the keyboard keys. I made a flight stick type joystick and a steering wheel.
10 For X=0 to 100
20 A$ =Y
30 Print CHR$(62)
40 Print CHR$(147)
50 GOTO 10
Darn I forgot how to make a ">" go across the screen this was my bullet... :-(
This is the first computer my brother owned! Either this or a Tandy pocket computer?
I wrote a very bad version of breakout on it around 9 or 10 year old. The ball only did a direct reflection when it bounced off the walls paddle or bricks. And the resolution was 1/2 character. I was only able to get a couple aliens on screen at a time for a space shooter.
I think this may have been the first computer I used basic on, but my school had Apple IIs so I might have used them first?
This was my first computer, back in the day, later we got a Tandy 1000
Weird comment in the video: serial isn't directly connected to the CPU. ??? The cassette and serial are directly connected to the CPU. There are level converters but that's the norm for RS232. At the time the MC10 was being sold it's biggest problem was the lack of software, the cost, the expandablity and that keyboard. Having said that I do like the 6803 processor, pretty good instruction set. I now have 2 MC10s in my collections (and the MCX128). I plan on trying out the HDMI upgrade and maybe a USB keyboard.
This was actually my first computer. I got one Christmas of ‘84 that my folks paid $50 for new. I learned basic on it, and had a lot of fun, but wound up getting a CoCo2 shortly afterwards.
There actually has been a device, the MCX32-SD, that adds 32 KB RAM, for a total of 36 KB, as well as gives you a better BASIC interpreter, finally with the ability to save machine language, and a version of DOS that works with an SD card, so you don't have to use the cassette interface if you don't want to. It's a very nice little device. Give MCX32-SD a google.
I had one, with the expansion pack! Bought it new during the liquidation phase. I think it sold then for 49$ canadian, and the expansion was 19$. Did not use it much. Had put my own cassette deck on it. It sure was a cheap way to get going on BASIC. But zero compatibility with the CoCo software. Too bad... Sold it a long time ago.
The MC-10 doesn't use anything from the original TRS-80 other than similar syntax for it's BASIC.
The small size is possible due to the built in functionality of he 6803 microcontroller, and minimal circuitry used.
No market? The TS-1000 sold over 1 million machines in year, it's parent the ZX-81 sold 1.5 million machines, and clones may have sold over 1 million units worldwide.
Customers disappointed with the TS-1000 may have been a major reason other machines targeting that market in the US didn't sell well.
If the MC-10 had been introduced at the same time as the TS-1000, Tandy probably would have sold a million of them.
It runs rings around the TS-1000, and it's BASIC is even faster than the Apple II or C64 for a lot of programs.
The serial port didn't use the hardware UART, but I won't go as far as saying it was near useless.
The MC-10 could connect with serial printers and modems of the day just fine.
It should easily handle 2400 baud modems with the right software, and drive a printer at 9600 baud.
MCX-BASIC communicates with the PC over the serial port at much higher speeds.
The MC-10 has a CLOADM command to load machine language programs, and a CSAVEM was published in a magazine shortly after it's release.
The Sinclair ZX80 (Timex Sinclair 1000) was hugely successful in Europe, particularly the UK, there is a world outside of the US.
You should watch our video on the Timex 1000, which covers exactly that
ZX81 (Which was also sold in the US briefly) not ZX80 which was the predecessor to the ZX81. In any case the TS1000 was successful enough in the US to warrant the TS1500 (a 16k version with a better keyboard) and the TS2068 (similar to the ZX Spectrum).
Yes, the ZX81 sold 1.5 million units during it's 3 year production run, hardly a failure. It was also my first computer.
No ..... really
My 1st computer. I wrote a lot of basic programs on this monster.
The TS-1000 supposedly sold over a million units in a single year, so I'm not sure I'd call that a failure, but then so many people hated it that it probably killed Timex's future in the market.
The Aquarius may have sold (shipped?) even fewer machines than the MC-10, but at least the company released a few games for it.
Tandy's launch of the MC-10 could best be described like this... they threw a newborn child into the water and said swim. They released two or three tapes with games, and never did any more with it. Compared to the TS-1000 and Aquarius it was a much more capable machine, but it was too small, too neutered, and too unsupported to succeed.
The MC-10 design is a clever engineer's dream, aka a disaster. The keys feel okay but the keyboard is too small to touch type on, the keyboard design complicates reading the keyboard, the memory map prevents BASIC from using much of the address space for RAM even with an external expansion, the video circuit is neutered in multiple ways so you can't use all the 6847 video modes there is enough RAM for let alone use the highest res modes, they reserved room for 16K of ROM in the memory map but only provided a room for a single 8K ROM, and the serial port is a bit banger design that completely ignores the 6803's built in hardware serial port. That's the highlights of my rant on the design.
I had one, it was my first computer. Poke 34343,255 used to crash it nicely 😂 CLOADM & CSAVEM worked on mine, and if not used correctly would generate an ?FM error (file mode)
The time of computers not just in your pocket but everywhere is where we are at for good or ill.
I bought one at a second hand shop, without knowing what it was. Since then I never managed to power it up, as the power adapter was missing. Anyway I'm glad to have a rare piece in my collection, hopefully I'll find its adapter and make it work again someday 😁
To be honest, it doesn't look bad at all!
Who knows, maybe the expansion port can be used to develop some kind of external device, that will make it shine again (or finally?)
In a pinch it'll run off of 6 volts DC. The polarity won't matter. However the cassette won't work powered like this. The missing power supply gives the computer 8 volts AC.
@@emuhill hi, thanks for the info. You meant 6 volts AC right?
BTW in the video he says that it doesn't have a CSAVE command, but it looks like it's on the top left part of the keyboard. So it doesn't work or what?
@@Fred_Klingon No I meant 6 volts DC. Yes it will work. And as I said before the cassette won't work. It requires an AC signal to work. But the rest of the computer will work just fine on DC. It has CSAVE. It doesn't have CSAVEM. That's the machine language version of CSAVE. It does have CLOADM though. So you you can load a machine language program. You just can't save it.
@@emuhill I'm a bit confused, you said that polarity doesn't matter, so it should be AC right?
Btw sorry, I don't know this computer very well, probably what you're saying will make sense once I try to make it work again..
I'm also not very expert with Basic and tapes, I only collect vintage computers...this one was at about 15€, so I purchased it, without knowing much about it, and the power supply wasn't included
@@Fred_Klingon Let me see if I can explain this a bit better. The computer is designed to work with 8 volts AC. The cassette port requires the 60 Hz line AC in order to function. The computer itself will work on 6 volts DC and as I said the polarity doesn't matter. For most DC applications the polarity does matter. The rectifier is located in the computer itself. So when you run it on DC, you are using only half of the rectifier. You can set the polarity to which ever you like. So if you just want to check the computer out and make sure everything is ok, you can use one of those universal power supplies. I don't recommend any voltage over 8 volts as that is likely to damage the computer.
A friend of mine in Engineering school had an MC-10. Since I had a Coco3, I was pretty familiar with MC-10 Basic. I did some programming work for him. Had the MC-10 been just a "little" better, it would have been more successful.
A computer in your pocket? Wherever you go? Who on Earth would use something like that?
I wouldn’t call the ZX81 a colossal failure. It may not have done very well in the US, but Sinclair sold over 1.5 million of them overall.
True, but the TS1000 was more of a failure...
That Aquarius needs cleaning.
Had one!! loved it!
The purpose behind these computers was cost, not size. No one back in those days bought one because it was smaller than a Color Computer or TRS-80 Model III. No thought that this was the direction the market was heading. The singular driving feature of these computers was simply cost. There was a race to the bottom (of price), and these computers were in the ~$100 range, which in todays dollars is equivalent to ~$250. What killed these computers was the nearly immediate drop in price of the higher end units like the Color Computer, which, the year the MC-10 came out, a 16k CoCo 2 was $239. People saw the better keyboard and the expandability of the Color Computer 2, and chose it over the MC-10 for those reasons AND the fact that $239 was a price point people were willing to pay. Sinclairs and MC-10s and the like were an experiment to see how low computers could be made, and since both machines were desktop units, the size of the MC-10 was considered a drawback, not a selling point. Also, no one aside from a very niche market even considered the pocket computers of the day, and no one was envisioning the smartphones of today. What killed these units was the fact that physically larger systems that were more capable of typing on like a typewriter, that had more compute capabilities as well, combined with the fact that the larger systems halved in price over the course of the previous year is what killed these computers. More than anything, these super low end computers were a failed expermiment with the market determining where the sweet spot in popularity (thus sales) was at. No one ever considered buying one of these units to run a business or do anything more serious than tinker, or something to buy for their kid. The physical size had NOTHING to do with why these systems were marketed, and people complained about the fact that they were too small. It wasn't the industry trying to create a PDA or handheld type device at all. This video is pretty ridiculous in it's reasoning.
Absolutely right. It was an exercise in cost cutting and had absolutely nothing to do with market direction. Also people seem to have a somewhat romantised view of the MC-10. It's was quite shit at the time, but rather cute.
We hope you guys have enjoyed our #septandy coverage!
Have you ever used an MC-10? What did you think of it?
Saludos desde Colombia, tengo uno y es muy bueno, lo que pasa es que tienes que compararlo en su nicho de mercado y con esos parámetros fue uno de los mejores. Además hoy hay una gran comunidad que sigue creando programas y nuevos dispositivos de hardware modernos que lo hacen más funcional, deberías de investigar más.
Greatest thing since slice bread when I was a kid. I still have mines
If they had had all the tech 3 or 4 yrs earlier would it have sold better?
Absolutely, if they had somehow shipped before the release of more capable machines and the price war between Commodore and TI it could have done better. I'm surprised it wasn't released in other countries (besides France) with less developed computer markets where it could have done well.
I'll admit, I've never even heard of this thing
I have only recently heard of it...kind of reminds me of the netbook line we went through a while back. That didn't succeed long term either. But going into it it is easy to see how it might have done better. But alas both machines had too many short comings and not enough benefits to use.
Worked for me !!!
I'd love to add an Alice to our collection!
I had one! It was more of a toy for me
I have one of these. I've had it for a long time and can only remember using it for about 30 minutes. What is it really good for?
Learning to program. I bought one for $20 from a friend and was so excited. I wanted to learn how to write video games. I wrote all kinds of little games and had a great experience. I didn’t get the manual so I didn’t know the poke codes. If i did that would have been great 😊
@@Greg-yu4ij OMG the joys and pitfalls of PEEK and POKEs
I actually programmed one that I input workers hours for each day of the week and it displayed their gross, the Federal and State taxes needed to take out and their net pay. My uncle would pay them from a wad of cash in a envelope and off to the bar they went. I had to write all the numbers from the screen because we never had a printer. It was a step up from doing all the calculations on a TI-55 which had a worker standing their 30 minutes he could tell me his work hours and get his money as fast as my uncle could count it. No checks back then, workers could barely read and write but they knew in their head close to the amount of money they should be paid. With the MC10 they could see the taxes and not feel cheated because a computer did it.
what about mainframes and supercomputers too? theyre soooo powerful!!!! yep....
The timex 1000 wasn't a commodore size bit but to call it a colossal failure is untrue. It sold well above expectations.
The timex 2069 was a colossal failure. The 1000 was not.
2/5 for aesthetics was way too low. Thats a score for a C64 breadbin, not for this beauty.
I had a Timex. At that time I saw the Tandy MC-10 too late. I remember being so sad Ididnt buy this tandy instead
Yes, for the extra $20, the MC-10 was a better system with color, twice as much RAM, better keyboard, a sturdy 16K RAM expander, higher res graphics, a RESET button and a POWER switch.
Big in France, huh, I guess that helps explain Jerry Lewis.
No modern accessories? Ehrm.... there's a 128k card that fits into the memory expansion connector and expands BASIC as an option at bootup. It can load and save to virtual disks over drive wire server. ruclips.net/video/FXY279q7YNg/видео.html
Ah Tandy. The kids from the damned.
I want one.
I had one
it was my first computer
U must be Canadian. hahahaha. Subbed.
Not Canadian but close enough lol.
@@NewsmakersTech Clean "canadian" style accent and good french so, was a worthy guess. hahahaha
Wisconsin is basically south Canada so you aren't far off.
@@NewsmakersTech that completely explains it. nice!
My first computer. Nothing but disappointment 😔
What did you use after you got sick of it?
If you wanted games, yes. If you wanted to learn BASIC programming, it was a good start.
So this machine isn't compatible with Coco cartridges? Ugh, what a rip-off!
6:22 nice French bro
Wait where are the Indians?
Let's be honest, the Speccy was both smaller and better...
Yes, but twice the price. For many people the Speccy would be the better choice but for those who couldn't afford the Speccy, the MC-10 was the better choice over the ZX81 / TS1000.
Tandy made many mistakes.
I remember back in 1983 right before I purchased my Atari 800XL. A friend had one of these computers and was trying to sell it to me for only $50. I took it home for a week to play around with it. What a piece of crap. I was glad to return it to my friend, and very glad I purchased the Atari instead. I feel bad for all those kids back in the day that got stuck with the the Tandy MC10, because parents knew nothing about computers and went with the cheapest thing they could find.
Yeah, even a starter system the MC-10 just doesn't make a lot of sense, maybe if it had been released a few years earlier when expectations were lower but there were so many better options
There probably weren't that many kids who had to use it; it wasn't on the market for very long.
I used my MC-10 for about 1.5 years. After 6 months I bought the 16K RAM expansion.Then I got the opportunity to swap it for a 2nd hand 600XL (16K) that only had Star Raiders and one joystick. But wow, the Atari 600XL had 256 colours and a much larger user base. I still use an Atari 8bit homecomputer in 2020 (playing new/old games on it). I do NOT dislike the MC-10. I have good memories using this tiny computer and still love it.
@@NewsmakersTech That may e true for people who could afford the better computers and/or parents willing to buy it for them. But when all you have is pennies you can't buy the triple digit computers. I picked up my MC-10 when the price dropped to $79. and saved another 2 months for the expansion card. I did get lucky when a friend of mine gave me his Tape drive. I hope I never forget the joy I had with that lil computer. I kept and used it for around three years. until I bought an C64 and (like a fool) took it back a week later for a Plus4. now the Plus/4 was a failed computer.
Clean your keyboard