I wish so badly I knew this 😪 years ago. foolishly believing that very same statement, and a 2 minutes of muted body cam, ruined my life. please don't make the same mistake and trust those words. "I'm recording, so it's fine." it wasn't fine.
I was going for a walk one night. I was wearing a reflective vest and carrying a flashlight. A cop stopped me and asked me what I was doing. " I'm going for a walk." He acted like I was acting suspicious. Yes, if I am up to no good, I'm going to be carrying a flash light and a reflective vest so I can attract as much attention to myself while I'm acting suspicious.
Sadly, the police are trained to see everyone they encounter as a criminal and to be treated as guilty, until they are either called off by a supervisor or the suspect "cooperates" .
WAIT A MINUTE! They said he was on their wall; so, if they actually said that, then somebody needs to be held accountable for making a false report to the police.
Wouldn't that actually give police enough to lawfully detain someone? If somebody runs up to the police and tells them you just sexually assaulted them the police would be able to detain you wouldn't they? So if that is true then any crime someone else alleges you committed would be enough for police to detain you right?
Good job reporting. Mesa and Phoenix police are notorious. Wish I had the quick thinking when I was swarmed and surrounded by Phoenix police at bus stop wearing a boot for a broken foot. My 'crime': suspicious character...
Not from that close!!! You can only stand at the fence which is several hundred feet away so your point is null. And if you mouth off to the secret service, you will be taken down and put into cuffs.....they don't have time to deal with idiots like this guy
@@C8guy84 you've never served in the armed forces have you? The reason they have security at facilities like this is because of the threat of terrorism. I'd rather have my water safe than poisoned by some terrorists
I have been arrested 6 times because of a restraining order they had video of me doing the exact opposite and I was charged with driving by my ex's house which is 2 blocks over I didnt get arrested for the "driving on her moms" road not hers not the one on paper it was said I made eye contact also was told I waved I would have definitely given another signal I see woman battered and abused I've never touched a woman nor would I ever and as soon as judge found out she is using it as a sword instead of shield.. finally judge got what is going on now i have full custody but only because 1 good public servant negated all of the other officers and let's just say she was crying after judge freaked on her sorry guys for the rant but something's i need off my chest
Yeah, but the suspect has a camera, so they no longer have to follow the law or punish those that break it, as long as it's agaisnt the dreaded Camera User.
I highly doubt that was the exact description that was given. They probably called in about a guy recording and the cop added some bs that they were told he climbed on the wall.
Cop : "Whats going on?" Apparently the people at this facility are calling in false police reports and the cops are violating rights, seems pretty clear.
sgfan5000 my interpretation is that he didn’t have a crime of “wrongful reporting of crime” or whatever that is in the US, not that he needed the reporters name to investigate the trespass
Cops hate when you know your rights. Check out one of my 1st Audits I did. Let me know what you think PASS or FAIL?👮📸 If you like what you see please show support by subscribing👍 ANTHONY X 1st Amendment Audits (( CLICK BELOW )) ruclips.net/video/F3KAT5sx5gI/видео.html
Shouldn't the person who called in have to prove their suspicion rather than the guy they called on have to prove they're innocent wow the way they twist things
Trust me give me 5 minutes and I can overmatch intellectually this idiot behind the camera I can have a seven-year-old do it too if you don't believe me he is the brains of a toddler and if you agree you are obviously due to
I like how the first cop told the female one "You're live on the Internet" as soon as she looked reluctant to give ID. Without that prompt she probably would have stuck to "right here".
00:3 "Have i committed a crime?" "well im investigating a crime" 00:20 "Well i dont have a crime at this point" Lmao he is literally trying to create a crime
No, what's happening is he is investigating ya know like getting 1 side of the story then getting the other before he just goes they said you were on the wall now we are gonna take you to jail. if I am sounding dumb I am trying to put this in words people with 2 brain cells could understand.
Exactly, everybody's acting all mad that someone lied to the cops when it's so obvious to anyone who has dealt with cops much that they always lie and hype up what they are investigating to make you defensive and explainy...
At about 15 mins & 17 seconds when she only pointed to her name-tag and refused to verbally state her name, the male cop said, 'He's on-line right now', she immediately said her name. Ah, the power of the Auditor videoing them works wonders.
@Michael Crouch I'm not 100% sure you're correct that they are LEGALLY required to identify themselves. They might be, but from everything i'm reading, it seems more like each police department gets to decide on specific policy. Also, in a # of jurisdictions, they don't even have to tell you why they stopped you until arraignment.
One opportunity auditors miss: When a police officer says "we're detaining you for suspicion because someone reported you [blah blah blah]" the auditor needs to point out that the officer is required by the 14th Amendment to give the auditor equal protection. Assuming the auditor is guilty because another person said so, without probable cause to conclude that they are likely to have committed a crime, is therefore a 14th Amendment violation.
In the UK they would just say you said whatever, and then say you can't use the video as evidence, speaking from experience in our wonderful secret courts
@@majortom1950 How is that even remotely stupid. @Sea Hawks was just saying that, as they would never help you with your job, than why would you help with their job. More' over when its their job to steal (under threat of violence) either time or money from you, why would you want to help them.
I love how cops always say they deserve respect from the public but yet when this lady cop shows up with the attitude of my name is right here is just such disrespect. She’s got a huge attitude because she thinks her shit don’t stink being a cop.
Any where outside the wall even on the grass can be accessed by the public. The guy has the right of way to walk up to that gate just not threw the gate unless cleared to do so. This camera man could have even climbed the wall and looked over but not gone over. Anywhere up to that wall or fence between the side walk and fence can be accessed by the public.
The burden of proof is on the accuser always. The blue line thugs should have never talked to you until they confirmed the caller statement. The one officer was fishing for anything that he could arrest or cite you for. Be safe.
As soon as the 1st officer told her she is live , suddenly she fell into line. Wow, that tells you where they are in egos and their abuse. Terrible policing.
if you're working and someone suddenly comes up with a camera live streaming you, I bet you are going to act a little different and be especially careful you are doing everything exactly right. That's what people do bud, they get more careful when they know they are being watched, especially if they are being recorded. That's literally the reason so many areas around the world are creating cctv networks and putting cameras everywhere... b/c it's human nature to behave better when you know you are being observed, that's why the majority of serial killers choose poverty stricken areas to pick their victims(that's why prostitutes are the majority of their victims) less chance of being observed and noticed. That's why when people go into stores to petty theft the first thing they do is look around to see where the cameras are and then avoid them. I can go on and on but you get the point.
IT'S ON US TOO.....WE ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN & now they pushed it too far the TAXPAYERS WANNA STEP IN NOW. Where were we when they voted themselves a PRIVATE UNION & OFFERED OFFICERS QUALIFIED IMMUNITY????? That had to have been passed somewhere!! WE FAILED OURSELVES IT SEEMS.
Funny is when you ring them to report a incident or crime and they treat you as you are the criminal.. Won't do that again..they go opposite and confrontational either way..they are tyrants..
Yeah, this exactly. The burden of proof lies with the facility staff, and it was immediately clear that they did not have any substantial evidence to back up their claim. We supposedly don't assume guilt in this country, but a majority of this video shows quite the opposite.
@@chewchewtrain3165Whether it's true or not is another matter entirely, you said the issue itself had been dodged when it hadn't been, as I pointed out.
It sounds like the pigs fabricated the claim that he was on the fence.. that's why I said FOIA the call. If they said he was "at their gate" and then the pigs changed the story for a reason for detainment. Cops bend the law to enforce their will. This is sad. All of these cops knew the entire time that he never went on their fence/gate.
@Miro Mato That's your opinion, but what does it have to do with what I said? She didn't need to go for one or the other, for all you know the miscommunication occurred between two or more people at the plant, e.g. one worker reported something to someone else, and that person made the call to the police. That's why police officers conduct investigations after receiving reports, to ascertain the truth. I'm sure you expect to be given the benefit of the doubt, yet here you want the police to immediately assume there was a criminal conspiracy among the plant workers, when there's likely no evidence to suggest that it was anything other than a simple mistake.
it's because they're literally too dumb to understand what is happening. they have been taught catch phrases. STOP RESISISTING. I FEARED FOR MY SAFETY. usually screamed loudly only as soon as other officers can hear so they know the drill
Any time you talk about your rights they say oh you wanna play that game huh. If a cop ever says that to me I'm gonna curse them out and say my rights are not a fucking game!
As the saying goes . . . 'what's good for goose, is good for the gander.' Cameras, are neutral . . . those that review, will recognize a lie ! NOW, charge the accuser !
He is a liar. I would get a public records request for that call to the police. He completely lied to you. Please follow up if they called and said u were on their wall and trespassing
Hey John...you are right....but here is what gets me really pissed off.....nothing happens to the officer who lied...now if we lied...yeh right...no good rotten S.O.B just because they have a badge...the bad part is that the corruption in the police force is at an epidemic level in the U.S.....the corruption is every where. you know John,...I've been reading and seeing a lot of these clips and I come to this conclusion....who and what is gonna fight corruption...Think about it....who in their right mind would go against corruption...Yeh I know..It's sad.. but there is one constellation...I'm 79 and I can put up with all this bullshit for another dozen years or so...nothing much can be done so I just go with the flo and try to stay healthy.Anyway John...enough B.S. for now...have a good day and take care
Al Merenick the Supreme Court has ruled that police are allowed to lie. They do it all the time in interviews. Can even say that they have their DNA if they don’t. Don’t think we should promote lying at all. Kind of messed up that the FBI can charge u with a felony if they think u are lying. Completely insane
Personally I think the guy in the truck who called 911 made the "wall climbing" accusation. It didn't seem like the officer was lying about that but I could be wrong. Also this officer seemed nice but ill informed about ID laws
I'm all for liberty and sticking it too the man but Even a Civilian journalist should know The SPJ Code of Ethics - and follow them Minimize Harm is in there . Means to yourself and others . It's not required but it is a good idea they are written for a reason . www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp
sindessa orellia+ Sorry Orellia but you and the police officers on the scene can kick rocks. There so- called trespassing was heresay in other words they lied to make up a charge so bad enough to answer the call. If they said the photographer was just on the side walk then the company might think the police wouldn’t come. So they lie about trespassing so the cops would have to respond to the call. In essence this was intentional false report made. And that alone can be a charge in itself against the company. It’s either the company’s wrong or they dispatcher got it wrong, possible more training to get it right, not causing a waste of resources. And wasting the Auditors time...Stupid POC Officers.
It sounds like good idea but if you see your neighbors being irresponsible with a firearm across the street and you want to call the cops would you want the bad guys knowing your name and where your family sleep? Not likely.
Great audit!! I don't know the trespass statute in AZ but even if you were trespassing at one point you had already vacated the property, therefore there is no crime they could even site you for, most places you can only be criminally trespassed if you refuse to leave after given an opportunity to do so! 💯 you did amazing! They had absolutely no grounds for anything beyond consensual contact!
@@johnellis5820 That depends on the place and their statutes and how they are worded but for the most part no, the only other thing that would coincide is breaking and entering but most B&E laws will say a dwelling in the law and hoping the fence wouldn't count as entering a dwelling. If you just hop the fence but don't enter a dwelling (again depending on the place and statutes and how they are worded) then it is still only trespassing, I take it you don't know much about law and how it works.....but please instead of just making a statement without providing evidence for your claim, do tell what other crimes it would be and I will explain why or why they wouldn't fit.....
@Desert Dog: 1) Thank you for being an effective, knowledgeable auditor 2) don't "thank" them when in an instant they were itching to lock you up for tresspassing. I know you're trying to behave in a civilized manner but we're frustrated they're detaining you for no reason. So, no "Sirs" or thank yous unless deserved in my book. Blessings to you Brother.3) He didn't deserve your name.
It’s probably because they’re trying to watch their step somewhat and think back of how many rights they are actually stepping on doing things the way they want to not the way they supposed to
There’s a reason that an officer with six bars (30 years) of service, or more, doesn’t have at one chevron on his upper sleeve. Which means he is satisfied with a lower pension.
I love how the cops never realize they are the reason the camera is on. Like buddy you are my content and the whole reason I'm even here in the first place. Without you trying to do your job I'd literally have zero content! 🤣🤣
When you falsely arrest me for trespassing, read me my Miranda Rights, then I will ID myself. But the first name you become familiar with is Plaintiff,and you will be Defendant.
@ They can lie about having reason for the detention, but if they don't have a valid reason, as in the cop just made it up without anything else, its still an unlawful detention.
Paul Marglin Any Corrupt Cop will always try to say they got a call to check on a person that was Suspicious 🙄 When you are out doing a constitutionally protected activity it cannot be deemed a suspicious act! Even though Cops try everything with photographers and will try to play that card every single time, both to ID them or arrest them.
Thats why is someone calls a false report on you then infront of the cops call in a false murder or something and see his reaction if the cop gets mad then you suceed
*The back and forth banter is entertaining but could you imagine if you didn't say ONE word to those chatty-Cathy cops and just stood there with a smile for the entire time. That bozo would be so irritated because it takes 2 people to conversate.*
No! It's much more fun to accuse random citizens based on "Gossip". The Gossip game does not usually involve the first listener typing the message and personally broadcasting the message to everyone involved. So glad Officer Palmer has faith in the message from the 911 operator.
What the hell happened to America. I can’t believe it. How we used to envy the freedoms guaranteed to US citizens. We were jealous of the American dream. And to see it reduced to a paranoid police state is heartbreaking. The resemblance to Berlin in the 1930’s when Hitler rose to power, is chilling. Millions of Americans laid down there lives in two world wars to prevent the USA turning into this kind of country. And all of this is happening, whilst most citizens of the United States, seem to be asleep at the wheel. God help them when they wake up and realise that they are no longer live in ........ THE LAND OF THE FREE?
Auditeers wrong. This is not a casual consent. This is an investigatory detention. He is lucky he isn't in handcuffs and cited for not providing his biographical info. I dare to you to refute me. His smerk arrogance is going to land him in jail.
Wait a minute let's roll the tape back. 13:02 The cop said he is LAWFULLY detained because the complainant said he had trespassed, without any proof and just hearsay. But even if he was on the property at any point he would still have to be given a warning to leave and then a reasonable time to leave, none of which was even discussed by the investigating officers that they had asked that very important question to the complainant. Trespass is only a valid crime if you were asked to leave and didn't. No crime so not a lawful detention or a reason to ID.
@Las Vegas Free Press Interesting. Still I think that their very first steps should have been to talk to the complainant on the phone and ask if they asked him to leave, where he was, do they have video proof, etc., before they arrived and detained him. Maybe they are allowed to detain based on hearsay but it's just wrong. It's like me making false claims about my neighbor and having him detained, ID'd and questioned without providing proof first. Just wrong.
@Las Vegas Free Press Thanks. So we're supposed to know the law? According to a lot of police if a ctizen attempts to quote law to them we get treated with contempt and asked if we're a lawyer or where we went to law school. It's absurd when they do that. We should know the law better than them because laws are made for us to understand and follow but they don't like that because it reduces their authority.
@@astheworldburns3590 first of all the sentence reads, Reasonable articulable Suspicion of a crime. That has been, is being or is about to be committed. It does not read reasonable suspicion. Start there also read probable cause. And then you can probably read Terry vs Ohio. Oh and just an FYI the way they write law, it's meant to deceive.
What is if i kill someone and somebody telling the police that im the killer? Its also "hearsay". The guards telling the police he is trespassing or someone telling the police i killed somebody should be the same. Cant imagine that a detainment would be unlawful if someone accuse me of a murder.
@@Teddyafro17 of course it is. until the cops investigate and determine that you have committed a crime regardless of what it is, it's a violation of your rights what fucking planet did you grow up on.. that's why they have implied immunity so if they investigate like there supposed to do first and meet what they think is the probable cause or Reasonable articulable Suspicion of a crime standard then they could detain or arrest you they just skip right over that part go right to the investigative detainment and then investigate their lazy doing it backwards and think their implied immunity is going to save them really it's just common sense, logically thinking.
Here’s a thought... how about you talk to the person complaining, to get the details about the suspected crime, BEFORE you talk to the person who you can plainly see is not in the commission of a crime.
He was saying "If I can prove I wasn't on their wall, are you going to charge them for a false report?" As in he would have evidence to proof of their guilt, not his innocence.
@@bluelipbeaver Show me a single case where a black person today is sent to jai just for being black. If you are being sarcastic, my bad I just woke up.
I don't think you understand what hearsay is. If a person calls the police and says they witnessed this man on the fence...that is not hearsay. That is an eyewitness, which can be used in a court of law.
@@kevinzink9063 Actually that would be considered a false statement. Would be subject to criminalize penalties for false information to a 911 dispatcher. Because the eyewitness you're talking about was unwilling to sign on the dotted line. For his false statement I don't think you know what you're talkin about. If the eyewitness is unwilling to sign on the dotted line it's nothing more than hearsay which is inadmissible in a court of law.
944lucifer yep and hopefully they’ll take you to jail because you’re an idiot. There’s millions of people who NEVER HAVE ONE ISSUE with the police. Natural selection will take care of this soon enough
@@karixx5 why would they take me to jail, you are not obligated to answer questions, you have the right to remain silent, bootlickers must like getting their rights violated...
HAHA. I know. She immediately changed her tune after Officer Palmer told her she's live on the internet. I don't like it when Officers refuse to verbalize their name and badge number. It's vindictive when cops won't identify themselves because a citizen refuses to do the same.
So with this line of thinking, we just take everyone's word for "i am innocent" and nobody ever gets arrested for crimes... all they have to say is I am not guilty, move along... lol.. you audit guys are a joke!!! I say we start "getting some footage" outside every auditors house and see how they like our "freedom to film" bullshit! Its called respect - give it to earn it!
@Squeek Tate You see it as harassment, but I have had many conversations with officers that I have walked up to while carrying my Glock and guess what? if you don't shout insults at them they leave you alone because they now know you are not the threat... when you start coming at them looking to cause an argument damn right they have to cover their asses and find out who the idiots are that just started arguing for no reason! I have had over a dozen encounters/pulled over/etc this year alone with police and not a single ticket (they don't even take my firearm from my hip!)... Respect! give to get! (can't assume everyone is bad or they will do the same to you!)
They "thought" they saw him standing on their wall which turned out to be a public sidewalk. Because anyone can easily mistake a wall for a fucking sidewalk.
I think that female officer's ego was brutally hurt, when she was told she was live and had to identify herself... cause she clearly wasn't going to do it
You all know you guys are pretty dumb right you think you're above the law you're not which is why you Auditors keep getting arrested you keep going to jail and you keep losing your court cases
Awwwwwwweee, you interrupted me 😭😢. Priceless. Isn’t it “innocent until proven guilty” or is it now “guilty until proven innocent “ sad system. And this cop is a Di#*
Cops hate when you know your rights. Check out one of my 1st Audits I did. Let me know what you think PASS or FAIL?👮📸 If you like what you see please show support by subscribing👍 ANTHONY X 1st Amendment Audits (( CLICK BELOW )) ruclips.net/video/F3KAT5sx5gI/видео.html
it took her a whole 6 seconds where there was a conversation going. he asked she showed him her name. he said he couldn't read probably cause he only has 2 brain cells then what happened someone els talked not wanting to interrupt him she waited when he was done talking she reiterated it for his dumbass. cause belive it or not most people can read from like 5 10 feet away.
It might be legal but come on now when someone is standing around for 1 1/2 hours taking a video of a water treatment facility and taking videos of people coming and going, ya people are gonna start asking questions, you look extremely suspicious and a water treatment facility is vital to millions of residents in the area, if nobody investigated this guy and something actually happened you same people would be all over the cops for "not doing anything to prevent this". Hell he even could have been a disgruntled ex employee who fired 6 months ago and he was waiting for his old boss at the gates to confront with a weapon. Again you same people would be all over the police for not investigating someone standing around at the exit of the facility on a hot day in the desert for 1.5 hours. Police can't win with some of you no matter what they do and you KNOW it's true. Look for any little thing to complain about.
Hellooo! Mr. Police officer! You don't need to see any ID! 1st. Amendment! (if you're going to enforce the law please get your / and the citizens Right! together!) # bad cop!
“I’m too old and too lazy to climb the fence.” What a great line!
"You're being recorded too"
"Yeah, but my footage won't mysteriously get deleted or the audio suddenly go off"
😂
I wish so badly I knew this 😪 years ago.
foolishly believing that very same statement, and a 2 minutes of muted body cam, ruined my life.
please don't make the same mistake and trust those words.
"I'm recording, so it's fine."
it wasn't fine.
I was going for a walk one night. I was wearing a reflective vest and carrying a flashlight. A cop stopped me and asked me what I was doing. " I'm going for a walk." He acted like I was acting suspicious. Yes, if I am up to no good, I'm going to be carrying a flash light and a reflective vest so I can attract as much attention to myself while I'm acting suspicious.
Sadly, the police are trained to see everyone they encounter as a criminal and to be treated as guilty, until they are either called off by a supervisor or the suspect "cooperates" .
Should have beat the cop to the punch, Cop-what are you doing? You-acting suspicious
From a disabled COMBAT veteran, god bless anyone and everyone who uses and stands up for the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
"A right unexercised is a right lost" - T. Jefferson (IIRC)
Thank you for your service and sacrifice.
Fucking right bro.
Semper fi
someone got pulled over and is upset about it lol
"At this stage I don't have a crime yet" HE SAID IT ALL.
Yea and at first he said "well I'm investigating a crime"..make up your mind Officer!!
I am trying to find a law that I can pin on you so I can arrest you ! Dumb cop !
And at that point in time...STOP TALKING
nobody accused him of anything but the person that called,he was never under arrest
They certainly hate their minimal authority and power being challenged.
WAIT A MINUTE! They said he was on their wall; so, if they actually said that, then somebody needs to be held accountable for making a false report to the police.
O so if I make a false police report I get in trouble but if a company makes a false police report it's a misunderstanding I don't understand that
Wouldn't that actually give police enough to lawfully detain someone? If somebody runs up to the police and tells them you just sexually assaulted them the police would be able to detain you wouldn't they? So if that is true then any crime someone else alleges you committed would be enough for police to detain you right?
@@bennywhite7062 that makes them a person of interest but it’s not enough to be arrested. Not unless they admit it! Or someone saw them!
Ask them if they saw the pics on their camera?
Good job reporting.
Mesa and Phoenix police are notorious.
Wish I had the quick thinking when I was swarmed and surrounded by Phoenix police at bus stop wearing a boot for a broken foot.
My 'crime': suspicious character...
"This is a secure facility"
So is the White House, and people stand outside on the street, taking pictures
EVERY. SINGLE. DAY.
Not from that close!!! You can only stand at the fence which is several hundred feet away so your point is null.
And if you mouth off to the secret service, you will be taken down and put into cuffs.....they don't have time to deal with idiots like this guy
@@C8guy84 you've never served in the armed forces have you?
The reason they have security at facilities like this is because of the threat of terrorism. I'd rather have my water safe than poisoned by some terrorists
*Mic Drop*
pigs : 🤯
Stolen comment
@@0873sp not true. I've seen many people mouth off and flick off the secret service in front of the white House. It's called freedom of speech.
This is why people need more than 6 months of training to be a police officer.
Training is not the problem
The problem is the way they train them to be tyrant and corrupt
More than
If you make a false police report it is a crime. If they make a false police report it is a miscommunication?... That sounds non biased.
@Thomas Foley hey dude what's your point
I have been arrested 6 times because of a restraining order they had video of me doing the exact opposite and I was charged with driving by my ex's house which is 2 blocks over I didnt get arrested for the "driving on her moms" road not hers not the one on paper it was said I made eye contact also was told I waved I would have definitely given another signal I see woman battered and abused I've never touched a woman nor would I ever and as soon as judge found out she is using it as a sword instead of shield.. finally judge got what is going on now i have full custody but only because 1 good public servant negated all of the other officers and let's just say she was crying after judge freaked on her sorry guys for the rant but something's i need off my chest
Im surprised that you didn't know that "BADGES GRANT EXTRA RIGHTS"
Yeah, but the suspect has a camera, so they no longer have to follow the law or punish those that break it, as long as it's agaisnt the dreaded Camera User.
@@Chrisfragger1 absolutely correct, they hate cameras they can't control.
WHY DO COPS COPSPLAIN FALSE REPORTS??? THEY SHOULD CHARGE WHOEVER CALLED.
I highly doubt that was the exact description that was given. They probably called in about a guy recording and the cop added some bs that they were told he climbed on the wall.
@@dablocishot77 z
@@dablocishot77 No way - cops always tell the truth!!!
Because
www.answers.com/Q/Does_the_US_Supreme_Court_allow_police_to_lie
dablocishot77 I agree all the way. They made it up for a reason to detain
Cop : "Whats going on?" Apparently the people at this facility are calling in false police reports and the cops are violating rights, seems pretty clear.
Boosted LSS
That's the best line ever. All copwatchers should us that line starting now.
People should get huge fines or jail time for false reports
Cop says "I'm investigating a crime"..... "I don't have a crime yet" all within a minute or so lol
sgfan5000 my interpretation is that he didn’t have a crime of “wrongful reporting of crime” or whatever that is in the US, not that he needed the reporters name to investigate the trespass
Cops hate when you know your rights.
Check out one of my 1st Audits I did. Let me know what you think PASS or FAIL?👮📸
If you like what you see please show support by subscribing👍
ANTHONY X 1st Amendment Audits
(( CLICK BELOW ))
ruclips.net/video/F3KAT5sx5gI/видео.html
I believe he meant I am investigating a crime. I do not have EVIDENCE yet. or in other words, he is trying o figure out what is going on.
Shouldn't the person who called in have to prove their suspicion rather than the guy they called on have to prove they're innocent wow the way they twist things
@Sir Scrotus Hell, just system favors the caller also, they just automatically believe them I guess because they called.
I would respond to the cops with that as well. I am innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Cops can kick rocks until then.
no .. the LEOs investigate the call, which will determine who the instigator is.
Unfortunately , thats how it works with law enforcement
Exactly, i love this video because he exposes how cops are.
I love when a cop is totally and utterly overmatched intellectually. It’s like watching a robot short circuit.
Runtime error pc has caused fatal error (trying again) could not find resource pcbrain.jpg
how is it possible they're all this dumb!!
Trust me give me 5 minutes and I can overmatch intellectually this idiot behind the camera I can have a seven-year-old do it too if you don't believe me he is the brains of a toddler and if you agree you are obviously due to
I wouldnt say he was overmatched at all, cop stood his ground just fine, acted professional and answered the man's questions
Most cops are pathological and have low I.Q.’s.
I like how the first cop told the female one "You're live on the Internet" as soon as she looked reluctant to give ID. Without that prompt she probably would have stuck to "right here".
00:3 "Have i committed a crime?" "well im investigating a crime" 00:20 "Well i dont have a crime at this point" Lmao he is literally trying to create a crime
magic word - "potential"
No, what's happening is he is investigating ya know like getting 1 side of the story then getting the other before he just goes they said you were on the wall now we are gonna take you to jail. if I am sounding dumb I am trying to put this in words people with 2 brain cells could understand.
@B Rush saw* you dumb fuck
I caught that too
@Matteo Bianchi i get that, but if that were the case make it private property rather than public
No one is lying but the cop. He needed a reason to detain him so he made up the wall bit. Classic reversal.
Exactly, everybody's acting all mad that someone lied to the cops when it's so obvious to anyone who has dealt with cops much that they always lie and hype up what they are investigating to make you defensive and explainy...
B Calvert yep and this guy’s playing right into it.
B Calvert he literally said he hasn’t talked to them yet, only him. So if he hasn’t talked to them, who called and said he was on the wall 🤨
Cash Knowles no one. That’s my point
Leslie Walker yup. He needed to tell the cop that he’ll just FOIA the call to see who said that.
At about 15 mins & 17 seconds when she only pointed to her name-tag and refused to verbally state her name, the male cop said, 'He's on-line right now', she immediately said her name.
Ah, the power of the Auditor videoing them works wonders.
Amazing how an objective camera can inspire some actual credibility.
Are they legally obligated to 'Verbally' identify themselves?
@@janX9 yes.
@Michael Crouch I'm not 100% sure you're correct that they are LEGALLY required to identify themselves. They might be, but from everything i'm reading, it seems more like each police department gets to decide on specific policy. Also, in a # of jurisdictions, they don't even have to tell you why they stopped you until arraignment.
@@markp.8329 correct
One opportunity auditors miss: When a police officer says "we're detaining you for suspicion because someone reported you [blah blah blah]" the auditor needs to point out that the officer is required by the 14th Amendment to give the auditor equal protection. Assuming the auditor is guilty because another person said so, without probable cause to conclude that they are likely to have committed a crime, is therefore a 14th Amendment violation.
You are not obligated to help them with their investigation! Since the complainant called, he should talk to them first. Stay silent!
Yeah they don't come to our jobs and help us roof houses, sell cars, teach class, etc!
best advice what you dont say can not be used against you
In the UK they would just say you said whatever, and then say you can't use the video as evidence, speaking from experience in our wonderful secret courts
@@seahawks5725 That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard.
@@majortom1950 How is that even remotely stupid. @Sea Hawks was just saying that, as they would never help you with your job, than why would you help with their job. More' over when its their job to steal (under threat of violence) either time or money from you, why would you want to help them.
"I want to report a guy on my wall. Please send the dumbest officer you have to believe my story."
Oh no please send 3 of the Dumbest Criminals On Patrol.
I think this cop is lazy rather than dumb. Otherwise he would be looking at video taped for trespassing. Neither lazy or stupid is good!
LOLOLOL and lo and behold,,,,,,,,,,,,,THERE HE IS!!!
@@placitas52 I do understand him asking for ID. But when you lawfully refuse then it should stop.
The effectiveness of wasting this innocent guys time and detaining him to death is the point to deter him from filming again lol..
This cop's logic is textbook what's wrong with policing in America
Perfect comment and true!
@@richardmyhan8755 thanks bud
I love how cops always say they deserve respect from the public but yet when this lady cop shows up with the attitude of my name is right here is just such disrespect. She’s got a huge attitude because she thinks her shit don’t stink being a cop.
There's a very good chance the cop is lying about the caller saying you were "on the wall"; that happens to be the oldest cop trick in the book.
I smell something, you fit the description of or I got a call.
Any where outside the wall even on the grass can be accessed by the public. The guy has the right of way to walk up to that gate just not threw the gate unless cleared to do so. This camera man could have even climbed the wall and looked over but not gone over. Anywhere up to that wall or fence between the side walk and fence can be accessed by the public.
I thought you had to be given a morning before you can be trespassed
Or they could of said.. He's basically on the wall of our property.. And the cop exaggerated the claim ..
The burden of proof is on the accuser always. The blue line thugs should have never talked to you until they confirmed the caller statement. The one officer was fishing for anything that he could arrest or cite you for. Be safe.
Yeah. 2023 policing. Always escalate, guilty until you can convince prove your innocent.
Now FOIA request the call from the facility, the radio call out from the dispatcher, and see where the "miscommunication" really took place.
You mean who was lying.
And bodycams if they have to hear what he said yo them behind the wall
@@rentiap "Miscommunication" is cop talk when they talk to us. "Lying" is what they accuse us of when we miscommunicate.
"Your live on the internet right now...."
Female cop: Ok, THEN I should really act correctly and identify myself!?!?! What's up with that?
As soon as the 1st officer told her she is live , suddenly she fell into line. Wow, that tells you where they are in egos and their abuse.
Terrible policing.
But -- He can't be live, he already said that he was recording for a future investagative report.
if you're working and someone suddenly comes up with a camera live streaming you, I bet you are going to act a little different and be especially careful you are doing everything exactly right. That's what people do bud, they get more careful when they know they are being watched, especially if they are being recorded. That's literally the reason so many areas around the world are creating cctv networks and putting cameras everywhere... b/c it's human nature to behave better when you know you are being observed, that's why the majority of serial killers choose poverty stricken areas to pick their victims(that's why prostitutes are the majority of their victims) less chance of being observed and noticed. That's why when people go into stores to petty theft the first thing they do is look around to see where the cameras are and then avoid them. I can go on and on but you get the point.
They all seem to love having their pictures taken.
IT'S ON US TOO.....WE ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN & now they pushed it too far the TAXPAYERS WANNA STEP IN NOW. Where were we when they voted themselves a PRIVATE UNION & OFFERED OFFICERS QUALIFIED IMMUNITY????? That had to have been passed somewhere!! WE FAILED OURSELVES IT SEEMS.
@@richlaue For which you can use your live footage .
It's annoying when cops block the sidewalk with a 5000 lbs vehicle, then tell you not to block the sidewalk with your body.
Especially with all of the pedestrians trying to get by.
dont see them blocking anything stop making up things
You shouldn't make small talk with the tyrant, he doesn't deserve any courtesy.
Yes and these audit geniuses always talk way too much to begin with
@Samie Simon should be allowed to shoot Democrats on sight too, cus they're even dumber
Omg the cop literally looked like he was going to burst into tears when he said "I love how you interrupted me". You hurt the lil fellas feelings.
I think he's a very sensitive man outside of his uniform and that's not a bad thing that's probably his personality.
Funny how Police Literally take HEAR SAY AS ACTUAL EVIDENCE
Police only use the term hear say when you are counting on them to do their job
Funny is when you ring them to report a incident or crime and they treat you as you are the criminal..
Won't do that again..they go opposite and confrontational either way..they are tyrants..
Now hearsay is evidence!Dont you know?
Yeah, this exactly. The burden of proof lies with the facility staff, and it was immediately clear that they did not have any substantial evidence to back up their claim. We supposedly don't assume guilt in this country, but a majority of this video shows quite the opposite.
Stolen comment
This LEO is so out of touch with reality. Is he living in a "Call Of Duty" world?
looking at the shape of him, "Call of Donut" world
"This is a secure facility".....but I'm outside the "secure" facility.
Please stop making sense. It hurts their brains.
@Peter Nadreau False report. Do not do that.
@@raycyst1294 is dumb!
Its pretty weird that he is just standing outsifd recording😂😂how bored can you get.
@@ignanthunter6050 How dumb can you be? It's an audit, stupid!
You gotta be lawfully ARRESTED to show ID no time before that ,,,,detained does mean jack shit !
Each stripe on the forearm is 5 years service, right; so 30 years and no chevrons on his shoulder? Hmm.
LMAO, yep, that totally explains it all. All those years and no strips to show for it.
@FangBlah. Interesting. Thanks for the insight.
He doesn't seem to know the laws he has been enforcing for 30 years. What does that say?
"He's live..."
Immediately gives name. Lol
edd monte saw that too. Lol
When the courts determined that cops can lye to the public , I lost all respect for them.
“You’re live on the internet now”……..SILENCE 🤣😂🤣
"My name is Officer Palmer of the Mesa Police Department."
Should have been the first words out of his mouth when he approached the photographer.
Notice how he dodged the false report claim..
FOIA the 911 call and file charges against your accuser.
How was it dodged when the female officer explained it was a miscommunication?
@@doxholiday1372 ..and u believed her? 😂 What does boot taste like? Sheeple 🐑
@@chewchewtrain3165Whether it's true or not is another matter entirely, you said the issue itself had been dodged when it hadn't been, as I pointed out.
It sounds like the pigs fabricated the claim that he was on the fence.. that's why I said FOIA the call. If they said he was "at their gate" and then the pigs changed the story for a reason for detainment. Cops bend the law to enforce their will. This is sad. All of these cops knew the entire time that he never went on their fence/gate.
@Miro Mato That's your opinion, but what does it have to do with what I said?
She didn't need to go for one or the other, for all you know the miscommunication occurred between two or more people at the plant, e.g. one worker reported something to someone else, and that person made the call to the police. That's why police officers conduct investigations after receiving reports, to ascertain the truth. I'm sure you expect to be given the benefit of the doubt, yet here you want the police to immediately assume there was a criminal conspiracy among the plant workers, when there's likely no evidence to suggest that it was anything other than a simple mistake.
When you expose the cops tyranny they say “oh you are playing games.”
Mel Rose stolen comment
@@vipsvipsa1330 thats a stolen comment too
it's because they're literally too dumb to understand what is happening. they have been taught catch phrases. STOP RESISISTING. I FEARED FOR MY SAFETY. usually screamed loudly only as soon as other officers can hear so they know the drill
Any time you talk about your rights they say oh you wanna play that game huh. If a cop ever says that to me I'm gonna curse them out and say my rights are not a fucking game!
Vips Vipsa Your stupidity is not stolen. It’s all yours.
From the LEO: "You've heard of the telephone game, right?"
So you admit that everything NOT heard first-hand is considered hearsay
Funny how the female office was not willing to identify until the responding officer told her she was live on the internet.
John Christian 😂😂😂
And thats why they hate cameras.
As the saying goes . . . 'what's good for goose, is good for the gander.' Cameras, are neutral . . . those that review, will recognize a lie ! NOW, charge the accuser !
John Christian I don’t know if that’s exactly the case because the male officer didn’t even give her a chance to respond first.
Like the guy in Seattle who shot 2 cops in the back of head.. .
"all the horrible things happening in the world..." like Mesa pd murdering an unarmed man begging for his life?
AKA , "In this day and age"
+Brad the impaler Look up Daniel Shaver
fuck these corrupt punk ass cops but i praise the ones who aren't .
He is a liar. I would get a public records request for that call to the police. He completely lied to you. Please follow up if they called and said u were on their wall and trespassing
Hey John...you are right....but here is what gets me really pissed off.....nothing happens to the officer who lied...now if we lied...yeh right...no good rotten S.O.B
just because they have a badge...the bad part is that the corruption in the police force is at an epidemic level in the U.S.....the corruption is every where. you know
John,...I've been reading and seeing a lot of these clips and I come to this conclusion....who and what is gonna fight corruption...Think about it....who in their right mind would go against corruption...Yeh I know..It's sad.. but there is one constellation...I'm 79 and I can put up with all this bullshit for another dozen years or so...nothing much can be done so I just go with the flo and try to stay healthy.Anyway John...enough B.S. for now...have a good day and take care
Al Merenick the Supreme Court has ruled that police are allowed to lie. They do it all the time in interviews. Can even say that they have their DNA if they don’t. Don’t think we should promote lying at all. Kind of messed up that the FBI can charge u with a felony if they think u are lying. Completely insane
someone needs to be charged with false reporting or someone else needs to be placed on the Brady List
Personally I think the guy in the truck who called 911 made the "wall climbing" accusation. It didn't seem like the officer was lying about that but I could be wrong. Also this officer seemed nice but ill informed about ID laws
He’s a cop it’s not lying remember it’s “tactics” to manipulate and persuade you to give them permission to do what they want
I was in "my body" for the last hour...I know where I've been. Awesome!
I don't have a crime yet, I'm just fishing.
Show me your fishing permit ass-hole.
I'm trying to make up one.cause I'm an asswipe cop.
I'm all for liberty and sticking it too the man but Even a Civilian journalist should know The SPJ Code of Ethics - and follow them Minimize Harm is in there . Means to yourself and others . It's not required but it is a good idea they are written for a reason . www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp
sindessa orellia+ Sorry Orellia but you and the police officers on the scene can kick rocks. There so- called trespassing was heresay in other words they lied to make up a charge so bad enough to answer the call. If they said the photographer was just on the side walk then the company might think the police wouldn’t come. So they lie about trespassing so the cops would have to respond to the call. In essence this was intentional false report made. And that alone can be a charge in itself against the company. It’s either the company’s wrong or they dispatcher got it wrong, possible more training to get it right, not causing a waste of resources. And wasting the Auditors time...Stupid POC Officers.
😂😂😂😂😂
Sharp as a marble copper. " I'm investigating a crime". 17 seconds later- "At this point I don't have a crime yet" . What a turd.
Yep, numpty dumpty!
Cops lying should be outlawed. The caller should "HAVE TO" be identified. The anonymous complaint is pure bullsheit.
Constitution says you have the right to face your accusers
The cop is a liar. I’d bet that the person that called didn’t say he was on the fence.
It sounds like good idea but if you see your neighbors being irresponsible with a firearm across the street and you want to call the cops would you want the bad guys knowing your name and where your family sleep? Not likely.
@@e638m1811 I agree,
But I really think that is in court.
@@saintearth id be willing to say every cop is a liar. Every one i met anyhow.
So if I get charged with making a false police report, I can just tell the judge it was miscommunication? Yeah I bet that wouldn't fly
"I was in my body for the past hour" hahahahahah
Yes that was funny as hell
Great audit!! I don't know the trespass statute in AZ but even if you were trespassing at one point you had already vacated the property, therefore there is no crime they could even site you for, most places you can only be criminally trespassed if you refuse to leave after given an opportunity to do so! 💯 you did amazing! They had absolutely no grounds for anything beyond consensual contact!
Unless signs are posted.. but they need to be given some kind of proof of a crime first before they can detain and I’d.
On the wall would be criminal trespass subject to arrest. Ould even be attempted burgulary. In this case he was totally legal.
Climbing on the wall COULD be a bit more than simple tresspass
@@johnellis5820 That depends on the place and their statutes and how they are worded but for the most part no, the only other thing that would coincide is breaking and entering but most B&E laws will say a dwelling in the law and hoping the fence wouldn't count as entering a dwelling. If you just hop the fence but don't enter a dwelling (again depending on the place and statutes and how they are worded) then it is still only trespassing, I take it you don't know much about law and how it works.....but please instead of just making a statement without providing evidence for your claim, do tell what other crimes it would be and I will explain why or why they wouldn't fit.....
Did that cop say "I'm investigating a crime" and then in the next sentence he says " I don't have a crime"? WTF.
Yup 🤣🤣
Stupid is as stupid does !
Detention OVER
Yes he did, then he illegally detained him.
He didn't have a crime because he was legally detaining in order to investigate to see if a crime was committed which is lawful
@Desert Dog: 1) Thank you for being an effective, knowledgeable auditor 2) don't "thank" them when in an instant they were itching to lock you up for tresspassing. I know you're trying to behave in a civilized manner but we're frustrated they're detaining you for no reason. So, no "Sirs" or thank yous unless deserved in my book. Blessings to you Brother.3) He didn't deserve your name.
Palmer did not uphold his oath he thought his feelings are law. Please get the 911 call and id the people who reported a false report.
. pa|mer ac0ckkkzukazhh
I have noticed from all these audit videos ,.that when you mention your rights being violated ,.the police just stare blankly into space
Cause the dont care about you rights !
The PD won't consider hiring anyone who isn't staring off into space.
It’s probably because they’re trying to watch their step somewhat and think back of how many rights they are actually stepping on doing things the way they want to not the way they supposed to
They arent used to citizens standing up for themselves. The time has come that we stop the tyranny and corruption going on. VIVA LA REVOLUCION
There’s a reason that an officer with six bars (30 years) of service, or more, doesn’t have at one chevron on his upper sleeve. Which means he is satisfied with a lower pension.
I love how the cops never realize they are the reason the camera is on. Like buddy you are my content and the whole reason I'm even here in the first place. Without you trying to do your job I'd literally have zero content! 🤣🤣
SMH. It’s been like this for yearssss and low and behold they fall into the same trap. 🤦🏿♂️
This guy will make detective in no time with his super sharp investigative skills
When you falsely arrest me for trespassing, read me my Miranda Rights, then I will ID myself. But the first name you become familiar with is Plaintiff,and you will be Defendant.
100% the cop made up the you were on the fence story in order to detain you.
I agree. He's a terrible actor.
Oh, so you were there? You know that for a fact?
ANKH-RA 999 permitted or not they’re going to do it anyways.
@
They can lie about having reason for the detention, but if they don't have a valid reason, as in the cop just made it up without anything else, its still an unlawful detention.
mike Bordeaux stolen comment
“I was in my own body for the last hour i know where I’ve been” 🤣 🤣 🤣
guy stands around in broad daylight with camera - "suspicious activity"
Paul Marglin Any Corrupt Cop will always try to say they got a call to check on a person that was Suspicious 🙄
When you are out doing a constitutionally protected activity it cannot be deemed a suspicious act! Even though Cops try everything with photographers and will try to play that card every single time, both to ID them or arrest them.
Ask to see it lol
Suspicious is not a crime !
@mike kylas so it's parasitic to stand up for your rights?
They still made excuses for the people making a false report. Smh
@mike kylas Its wrong for them to be secretive. but you are right. eventually the government building will build higher walls etc. on out tax dollar.
Thats why is someone calls a false report on you then infront of the cops call in a false murder or something and see his reaction if the cop gets mad then you suceed
They don't want to do paper work. They would rather have an incident of violence or something to get the blood pumping!
*The back and forth banter is entertaining but could you imagine if you didn't say ONE word to those chatty-Cathy cops and just stood there with a smile for the entire time. That bozo would be so irritated because it takes 2 people to conversate.*
It's funny to see the cops reaction once he was denied to see his I.D. 🤣 like a kid he crossed his arms & put on a sad face 😞
"They're reporting, we're verifying." So go verify. Ask them for their EVIDENCE!
EXACTLY!!
No! It's much more fun to accuse random citizens based on "Gossip".
The Gossip game does not usually involve the first listener typing the message and personally broadcasting the message to everyone involved. So glad Officer Palmer has faith in the message from the 911 operator.
What the hell happened to America. I can’t believe it. How we used to envy the freedoms guaranteed to US citizens. We were jealous of the American dream. And to see it reduced to a paranoid police state is heartbreaking. The resemblance to Berlin in the 1930’s when Hitler rose to power, is chilling. Millions of Americans laid down there lives in two world wars to prevent the USA turning into this kind of country. And all of this is happening, whilst most citizens of the United States, seem to be asleep at the wheel. God help them when they wake up and realise that they are no longer live in ........ THE LAND OF THE FREE?
@@mrf4138 And all because of what happened on 9/11 Thank you Bin laden!! 🖖😆😂
YUP
You've got serious stones auditing Mesa PD. You're lucky they didn't send SWAT in w/ air
support.
air support...funny but true.
Or getting pummeled by a corrupt deputy
So much respect to the first cop simply for coming out with not one, but THREE cameras.
Had me a chuckle
Auditeers wrong. This is not a casual consent. This is an investigatory detention. He is lucky he isn't in handcuffs and cited for not providing his biographical info. I dare to you to refute me. His smerk arrogance is going to land him in jail.
Wait a minute let's roll the tape back. 13:02 The cop said he is LAWFULLY detained because the complainant said he had trespassed, without any proof and just hearsay. But even if he was on the property at any point he would still have to be given a warning to leave and then a reasonable time to leave, none of which was even discussed by the investigating officers that they had asked that very important question to the complainant. Trespass is only a valid crime if you were asked to leave and didn't. No crime so not a lawful detention or a reason to ID.
@Las Vegas Free Press Interesting. Still I think that their very first steps should have been to talk to the complainant on the phone and ask if they asked him to leave, where he was, do they have video proof, etc., before they arrived and detained him. Maybe they are allowed to detain based on hearsay but it's just wrong. It's like me making false claims about my neighbor and having him detained, ID'd and questioned without providing proof first. Just wrong.
@Las Vegas Free Press Thanks. So we're supposed to know the law? According to a lot of police if a ctizen attempts to quote law to them we get treated with contempt and asked if we're a lawyer or where we went to law school. It's absurd when they do that. We should know the law better than them because laws are made for us to understand and follow but they don't like that because it reduces their authority.
Not if it's posted
Great analogy: "Telephone Game", perfect quote for potential jury to hear, planting seed of doubt.
Investigative detainment is only after Reasonable articulable Suspicion of a crime. Hearsay does not meet that standard.
@@astheworldburns3590 ; yes there is.
And you should absolutely look it up yourself . Don't believe anything you see, here, read on RUclips..
Lars Andersen
So anyone can make anything up on you and then you lose all your rights under the constitution. That’s beyond laughable.
@@astheworldburns3590 first of all the sentence reads, Reasonable articulable Suspicion of a crime. That has been, is being or is about to be committed. It does not read reasonable suspicion. Start there also read probable cause. And then you can probably read Terry vs Ohio. Oh and just an FYI the way they write law, it's meant to deceive.
What is if i kill someone and somebody telling the police that im the killer? Its also "hearsay".
The guards telling the police he is trespassing or someone telling the police i killed somebody should be the same.
Cant imagine that a detainment would be unlawful if someone accuse me of a murder.
@@Teddyafro17 of course it is. until the cops investigate and determine that you have committed a crime regardless of what it is, it's a violation of your rights what fucking planet did you grow up on.. that's why they have implied immunity so if they investigate like there supposed to do first and meet what they think is the probable cause or Reasonable articulable Suspicion of a crime standard then they could detain or arrest you they just skip right over that part go right to the investigative detainment and then investigate their lazy doing it backwards and think their implied immunity is going to save them really it's just common sense, logically thinking.
That poor officer has no logic in his programming, just fear of the camera .
Here’s a thought... how about you talk to the person complaining, to get the details about the suspected crime, BEFORE you talk to the person who you can plainly see is not in the commission of a crime.
That makes entirely too much sense.
I agree get the people to come out too the sidewalk that are making the calls instead of detaining him for no reason.
Because they do not know how to do the job. Or don't believe the rules apply to them.
"If I can prove I wasn't on their wall?" Really? You don't have to prove your innocence. They have to prove your guilt.
He was saying "If I can prove I wasn't on their wall, are you going to charge them for a false report?" As in he would have evidence to proof of their guilt, not his innocence.
Not anymore. General Flynn lied to the Vice President and to the FBI. Not a fucking problem. He walks, while blacks go to jail. Just for being black.
@@bluelipbeaver Show me a single case where a black person today is sent to jai just for being black. If you are being sarcastic, my bad I just woke up.
Officers will believe hearsay over video evidence any day of the week.
Every "call" that they get is hearsay
Hear say cant be used in courts but on the streets cops tend to use that to justify their actions
so will a fucking judge.just a bunch of collector of fund.no fucking justice there either.
I don't think you understand what hearsay is. If a person calls the police and says they witnessed this man on the fence...that is not hearsay. That is an eyewitness, which can be used in a court of law.
@@kevinzink9063
Actually that would be considered a false statement. Would be subject to criminalize penalties for false information to a 911 dispatcher. Because the eyewitness you're talking about was unwilling to sign on the dotted line. For his false statement I don't think you know what you're talkin about. If the eyewitness is unwilling to sign on the dotted line it's nothing more than hearsay which is inadmissible in a court of law.
I have encountered many police where I live in Canada 95% of a cordial and they generally want to help I really feel for you guys
"I'm investigating a crime". A few moments later... "Well at this stage I don't have a crime yet."
He was investigating a crime so he didnt have one yet.
translation..."I'm trying to find a crime to charge you with, just let me continue you to interrogate and I will"
@@r.h.6402 Naww little snowflake wants their apology? Naww diddums. Get over its 😂😂😂
Never talk to police, " I don't answer questions" should be the only thing you say to them
944lucifer yep and hopefully they’ll take you to jail because you’re an idiot. There’s millions of people who NEVER HAVE ONE ISSUE with the police. Natural selection will take care of this soon enough
@@karixx5 why would they take me to jail, you are not obligated to answer questions, you have the right to remain silent, bootlickers must like getting their rights violated...
Doesn't make for good video, though
"Youre live on the internet" immediately gives badge number lmao.
HAHA. I know. She immediately changed her tune after Officer Palmer told her she's live on the internet. I don't like it when Officers refuse to verbalize their name and badge number. It's vindictive when cops won't identify themselves because a citizen refuses to do the same.
@@Dan-ys8nk and so many of them refuse. It’s incredibly frustrating
"I was on my body from last hour I know where I been " that one kills me 😆😆😆😆
13:38 He claims he can stop anyone at any time until he figures out if there's a crime? Nope.
They really believe they can.
@Squeek Tate * All suspects are guilty period! Why else would they be suspects.
@Squeek Tate * Star Wars meets Cops
Troops (1997) Star Wars / COPS parody. HQ video / original soundtrack
ruclips.net/video/5HO70-Rk3jE/видео.html
So with this line of thinking, we just take everyone's word for "i am innocent" and nobody ever gets arrested for crimes... all they have to say is I am not guilty, move along... lol.. you audit guys are a joke!!! I say we start "getting some footage" outside every auditors house and see how they like our "freedom to film" bullshit! Its called respect - give it to earn it!
@Squeek Tate You see it as harassment, but I have had many conversations with officers that I have walked up to while carrying my Glock and guess what? if you don't shout insults at them they leave you alone because they now know you are not the threat... when you start coming at them looking to cause an argument damn right they have to cover their asses and find out who the idiots are that just started arguing for no reason! I have had over a dozen encounters/pulled over/etc this year alone with police and not a single ticket (they don't even take my firearm from my hip!)... Respect! give to get! (can't assume everyone is bad or they will do the same to you!)
She was real fast to identify after finding out she was live on the internet
Lol
Notice the other officer made sure to tell her before it got out of control. He knows how his oficers act. lmao
Investigating a crime without a crime being committed, that's the police making their job harder
Nothing like an old fool....that first cop is a bully
A lie is now called a "miscommunication". I see.
Or “alternative facts”
They "thought" they saw him standing on their wall which turned out to be a public sidewalk. Because anyone can easily mistake a wall for a fucking sidewalk.
Are Misappropriating The Truth
"I was in my body for the last hour". Lol! That was awesome
stupid statement
@@OOPS2468 Yea, thanks for the laugh.
What a dumb fucking cop with his 5th grade ED
Cop: "Got ID"
DDCW: "Have I Committed a Crime"
Cop: "I'm Investigating a Crime"
DDCW: "Well, good luck with that, let me know how it works out"
There is no proof of a crime!!.. so fuck off.. and the people raised a concern then cop claims that they saw him do that..
That's how everything thing should go
all the cops want is to put whoever's name down on their reports and close the book asap for some donuts
Believe it or not I think that was a nicest I've ever seen any Arizona cop act. That state scares the shit out of me.
Should of foia requested all the calls and radio traffic and added it to the video so we could see how much the cop was lying
You are an idiot
@@MilesOcean Well well, tell me: which department do you work for? If you're a mall cop, do like sucking off LEO's?
I think that female officer's ego was brutally hurt, when she was told she was live and had to identify herself... cause she clearly wasn't going to do it
Female cops are the worst tyrants.
@@perdidoatlantic too emotional spiteful and vindictive the type that want to be police anyways
The B**** thinks she's GOD ! 😬
Yep above the law .....Pos.
You all know you guys are pretty dumb right you think you're above the law you're not which is why you Auditors keep getting arrested you keep going to jail and you keep losing your court cases
Awwwwwwweee, you interrupted me 😭😢. Priceless. Isn’t it “innocent until proven guilty” or is it now “guilty until proven innocent “ sad system. And this cop is a Di#*
All cops are Di¢#$
@@gimpyone77 not all, a cop saved my life when I was 7, but some cops are
you have to prove your innocent.
D = dirtbag by the way people
I love the directives at the end. Don’t kick your dog, don’t eat yellow snow. 👮🏻♀️🤡🤡
She wasn’t going to give her name and badge number until the other cop said she was being recorded 😂😂
Cops hate when you know your rights.
Check out one of my 1st Audits I did. Let me know what you think PASS or FAIL?👮📸
If you like what you see please show support by subscribing👍
ANTHONY X 1st Amendment Audits
(( CLICK BELOW ))
ruclips.net/video/F3KAT5sx5gI/видео.html
it took her a whole 6 seconds where there was a conversation going. he asked she showed him her name. he said he couldn't read probably cause he only has 2 brain cells then what happened someone els talked not wanting to interrupt him she waited when he was done talking she reiterated it for his dumbass. cause belive it or not most people can read from like 5 10 feet away.
She used to be my schools resource officer... I’m ashamed of it after this
@@nono-mb6it ok buddy 😂😂😂
I was in my body the last 1/2hr, I know where I’ve been 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👊
I’m a photographer and sometimes I do street photography. It’s scary that people don’t know it’s legal and constitutional
It might be legal but come on now when someone is standing around for 1 1/2 hours taking a video of a water treatment facility and taking videos of people coming and going, ya people are gonna start asking questions, you look extremely suspicious and a water treatment facility is vital to millions of residents in the area, if nobody investigated this guy and something actually happened you same people would be all over the cops for "not doing anything to prevent this". Hell he even could have been a disgruntled ex employee who fired 6 months ago and he was waiting for his old boss at the gates to confront with a weapon. Again you same people would be all over the police for not investigating someone standing around at the exit of the facility on a hot day in the desert for 1.5 hours. Police can't win with some of you no matter what they do and you KNOW it's true. Look for any little thing to complain about.
Due to fact of the fckn msm and gullible JACKASSES!
@@misguidedangel6550 a lot of people do things that make people feel uncomfortable, that doesn’t make it illegal
Hellooo! Mr. Police officer! You don't need to see any ID! 1st. Amendment! (if you're going to enforce the law please get your / and the citizens Right! together!) # bad cop!