They should make Wheatley from Portal 2 a real AI, just for testing purposes like these. Which'd be really on theme, making Wheatley test things. Never underestimate a moron.
I mean, the fact the fool didn't limit the data field to only accept whole numbers and had to test QWERTYUIOP tells me all I need to know ... OR it's using a standard text entry element and that's just begging for trouble. What about special characters? Are you doing encoding before sending the data to the backend? PLEASE tell me you're not just shooting data directly into the server without verification along a trust boundary ... Do you want injection vulnerabilities? Because that's how you get injection vulnerabilities!
Yep, when you're a playtester and you're actively trying out every single option to hunt out bugs, it's really easy to miss out on some details. It's best to just get actual players to play it normally and see what happens
@@migolo1415 Playtesting is important as well because usually it catches out the most outstanding issues. Imagine if the customer ordered 2 bears and the clerk started T-posing in the floor.
@@pup64hcp wait I thought it was because it was the one thing the tester _didn't_ test and as such the results weren't confirmed to make sure that wouldn't happen
@@eyweiuaiyeah, that’s actually what the joke is. As a programmer, you’ll never believe what we won’t consider testing. It’s why beta testers are so wildly important when they’re a real, normal user.
Reminds me of a post by a developer about the weirdest reports they got from gametesters. The one featured was something along the line of: "If you stand up on the corner on this outer ledge of that building, where you can only get to by parcouring up 4 stories on the invisible 1 Pixel topology ledges in the walls of the alleyway next to it, and look up into the sky at 46° vertical in north west direction, you are sent flying and eventually get shunted off the map." Their response: "Good catch, but HOW ON EARTH did you get the idea to even test that?!" 🤣
@@jawredstoneguy6058 I do believe I saw it in one of those Reddit compilations. Probably either by Kalbus or Emkay. Not entirely sure though, it's been a good while
It is. I read about this one racing game(i cant remember the name) where the developers made it so if the car was moving forward, and you hit the brake button the car would slow down. Seems alright, right? However people soon figured out that the brakes didnt work at all if you were driving in reverse. On top of that, you could even exceed the top speed of that car because in the program probably everything had been coded assuming the car is moving forward. Really goes to show how you have think from every scenario when coding
@@catpokerlicense big rigs over the road racing? In addition to the billion other bugs, the trucks have normal acceleration while in reverse and zero diminishing returns or cap. I don't remember if the brakes work or if this is achieved by hitting the gas to go forward, but all reverse velocity can also be instantly dropped to 0. Meaning you can go 4x the speed of light in reverse (you go so fast you just leave the map and drive around a white out of bounds void) and then instantly and disorienting come to a complete stop
Suddenly. The bartender found themselves covered in beer that Josh had somehow purchased for free. Then Josh proceeded to talk to the bartender for four hours while they were both engulfed in the drinks, somehow making a sum of a million dollars. Then the entire world stopped, and it all went black. Josh had crashed the game.
Let's game it out phases into bar. He asks for "infinite beers until the bar blows up". Then when it does blow up, he returns to it once it's fixed and tears time space continuum to somehow make himself the richest man in the world just using your bar equipment. Josh then uses excessive anount of mentos and cola and blows up your bar with a part of america
Josh: Hey there it's Josh, welcome back to Let'sGameItOut. Ah yes, 'bar simulator,' the game where you can get infinite money by ordering beers. Customer: What does that mean? Bartender: Lost count how many times this happens. I at least know it's so much I let it slide at this point. Him though, first time seeing him. Let's see how he'll do his shenanigans.
To those who dont get the joke: when programmers code they usually expect their code to only be used in a few ways, so when testing its important to try and think of "edge cases" (particularly odd inputs) that the user might make. Things like large numbers, negative numbers, and strings of characters are common kinds of inputs you might expect, but programmers often find users do simple things with their programs that should have been accounted for but never were thought of (think of like pressing the back button after submitting your login info, a website might have a tough time for a moment dealing with the unexpected input). (edit: these kinds of unexpected inputs often can lead to crashing or severely unexpected behavior. Speedrunners are good examples of people who learn to use things like this in unexpected ways. For example in ocarina of time speedrunners have learned to use bush, pot, and butterfly data combined with loading zones to give themselves free items, if done correctly, though they can crash if they mess up.)
The main thing OoT speedrunners use that glitch for is to give themselves the Shadow and Spirit Medallions early, which is the only thing the game checks for when deciding whether to load the Light Arrow cutscene. If you have the Shadow and Spirit Medallions, you obviously should have all the other Medallions required to unlock their temples, right?
@@1forge2rulethemall88 I had a simple IT class where it was just Python calculators I was programming, I decided to go above and beyond what the teacher suggested as far as code, and added three times as much to deal with all possible types of foolishness my brother could pull off. With messages before a reset to initial execution state being along the lines of "user is error" or "I'm a calculator not your girlfriend." For this clip or scenario the programmer should go back in and either expand into having a working restroom system, or have the bartender say it's out of order and point to a sign over a door.
For years always wondered the point of this joke, and you finally gave it a closure explanation. Cheers. I'll pay you a -526436/554*2 beers when we ever meet.
@@lemonlordminecraft I generally meant the unnatural things happening, but I guess you could interpret this video as different outcomes of measurements of a particle in superposition. If you imagine this all happening at the same time this could very well be a representation of superposition itself too. Im not studying Quantum mechanics yet tho, so my answer could be wrong.
@@Geolijon i thought the whole thing was supposed to be about testing edge cases and different inputs in software or video games, less so quantum mechanics
That second whammy at the end there caught me off guard somehow. Software code is not a science, it is an an art that sometimes morphs into a lovecraftian horror that will drive you insane attempting to figure out WHY it is breaching all known laws of logic and syntax. There is also no level of testing, in any field, industry, or application, be it software related or not, that can 'customer-proof' a product. It's why you occasionally see some really weird illustrated warning labels.
You can inspect a thing all you like, but putting it in the water is a surefire way to find the leaks. And there are some things you can't test for without putting strain on the system.
the idea of someone needing to crawl into an area to test and make sure it works seems absurd but after watching the BL2 boss spawn trigger break because a challenge runner was moving too slowly i dont know what to trust anymore
@@cherrycat5599 I'd say it's pretty fun. BLUF: "oh yeah it's worth it, if you're strong enough " The cons are that for the first two years if academia you're not really going to be learning EE, ECE,. It's a lot of math, infact, in my particular degree, you'd take at least two higher education math courses per semester for those two years. Additionally, quantum physics shows up! The pros are, you get to learn higher education math and quantum physics! Which might sound unattainable but a good degree plan will set you up for success. And with youtube, chat gpt(caution with that one), khan academy etc, and whatever other institutional resources you might have it's really kinda worth it. Assuming you're not working and have the money for tuition, bills, food etc. (But that's a rant for another topic) I've done about two classes I'd say are actually engineering, but some of the supporting class are absolutely worth it. Next semester will be when every class will be engineering and for the rest of my time at university.
Duuude, exactly! Testers are testing like the main features, then a random person tries to do something they thought might/should/must work and everything is now in flames
And then as soon as the tester tries to replicate what happened, it works completely fine, and the next fifteen hours are spent trying to figure out if the glitch was a one-time fluke or if the code has to be torn apart to fix one line of code
I had one of these on a data entry screen back in 1999 - we kept trying to reproduce the error, with no luck. Following their steps never failed. As it was a remote client, we finally asked the client PM to sit with the user and record exactly what they did - turns out that one field had no onClick action set. We couldn't find it because everyone on our team tabbed from field to field (the "obvious" fastest way through the screen) while the user took their hand off the keyboard to mouse from field to field... 🙄😂 To add insult to injury... We asked them to screenshot the error. When they finally did, and e-mailed it to us, we were shocked that the file was megabytes of data. Rather than use Shift-Prtscrn (or whatever the command was), they had used a digital camera to shoot a picture of the screen, then sent it to us in highest detail and colour in a non-compressed image format, probably bmp 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
this is some fucking impressive shading work. i'm still in shock over the cat guy- expressions aside, how did you _do_ that? it doesn't look like grease pencil to me, i imagine it's some geometry node wizardry- but then how is his outline offset like that without drawing the part that his body would cover? and how do some of the lines draw over, but not others? i have so many questions
He didn't test if he could duplicate any of the beers by crouch-jumping on top of them at a precise 32° angle while holding a book in his left hand while leaving the right empty.
No offense to software folks out there, your job is tough, but I will literally scream the next time I'm told you tested something so it's fine but the physical application you made it for doesn't even use that feature
If you ask for a better tailpipe on your bicycle you shouldn't be surprised when you get a better tailpipe on your bicycle. So that's not on the testers, that's primarily on the one who requested the change and secondarily on the product owner or whoever is supposed to confirm the design with the requester. Too many developers forget to check with the customer if this is actually what they want.
Oh, I see the issue here. See, you got the script function synchronized with the fireEvent_4 function, which makes sense when you're thinking that, 'hey I want the saloon to go up in flames too!' but where normally you have ent_Fire activate only when P_1 activates the cutscene trigger, this case its activated when someone asks a certain phrase. The command function for that has the same name has the fireEvent_4 function, which I'm guessing is a joke about Taco Bell or smth. Just change the name there, re-create the function and deal with all the bugs that creates. Hope I could help!
One time i had to reprogram a printer and for the start up it had to heat up the ink to idk 30 degrees or something so i had the code go if inktemp == 30; Inkheat = false And i had it check every ten seconds so it wouldn't be slowed down but i didn't expect it to hit them go over 30 degrees so after heating it up too long it exploded
That....was actually kind of an obvious flaw and an easy fix too. Even if you didn't think it was likely to go over 30 degrees you would still be safer with >= 30 there. At least you won't forget that again, I guess.
Makes me think of the very first Beta test for the game Palia in which every tester decided to see how many pies they would have to bake before the game crashed.
No amount of testing will survive the sheer capacity of normal users to try and do the exact thing you never thought of.
They should make Wheatley from Portal 2 a real AI, just for testing purposes like these. Which'd be really on theme, making Wheatley test things. Never underestimate a moron.
@@Lars_Hermsen
"I AM NOT A MORON!"
-WheatOS
@@slugcat_number_75487w h e a t
@@slugcat_number_75487Okay Mormon.
@herearesomerocks5396same lol
He forgot to order half a beer to test float data types
exactly
It's way too easy to just not allow periods and to just ignore it entirely but hey if you want It's a good challenge.
I mean, the fact the fool didn't limit the data field to only accept whole numbers and had to test QWERTYUIOP tells me all I need to know ... OR it's using a standard text entry element and that's just begging for trouble. What about special characters? Are you doing encoding before sending the data to the backend? PLEASE tell me you're not just shooting data directly into the server without verification along a trust boundary ...
Do you want injection vulnerabilities? Because that's how you get injection vulnerabilities!
@@ceddavis7441thing is, half a beer is something I'd personally expect to work, so just ignoring wouldn't be a great solution either
@@ceddavis7441"just not allow periods"
Oh you naïve little thing.
0:14 I love how the eyes of the bartender slowly widen as he said his order lol
good attention to detail
i love -how the eyes of- the bartender -widens as he said his order lol-
@@slugcat_number_75487 -I love how the eyes of- the bartender slowly widen -as he said his order lol-
Holy shit 😂 Good catch.
@@ultimaxkom8728 -I love how the e- yes -of the bartender widens as he said his order lol-
Ah yes I quite like my beer with a side of "unexpected OverflowException at line, 3092"
Funniest comment here
Especially when line 3091, 2 and 3 are all blank
That's why having people play the beta test of the game is actually a great idea.
Yep, when you're a playtester and you're actively trying out every single option to hunt out bugs, it's really easy to miss out on some details. It's best to just get actual players to play it normally and see what happens
@@migolo1415get a streamer to do it.
@@WalterUndergoGet Let's Game It Out to play it.
@@migolo1415 Playtesting is important as well because usually it catches out the most outstanding issues. Imagine if the customer ordered 2 bears and the clerk started T-posing in the floor.
For best results use both
"Orders -1 beers"
I'd give this guy 4,294,967,295 beers if he did this
I see, you are a man of culture
@@gofrisuto I actually memorized the number)
me when life::services::food::Bar::OrderBeer(unsigned int amt);
Index was out of range. Must be non-negative and less than the size of the collection.
@@thenamestails7152we pretty much have to memorize a few powers of two.
Received a few devices and noticed a peculiar serial number.
"Heh, 2^19"
A software tester walks into a bar.
Tester's note: "Clipping issue with bar."
As a bartender myself I can confirm that people order -1 beers
To get less drunk
It’s just water lol
Weird, you should try using unsigned int type variables, Maybe that'll work.
What, do you just pass them an empty pint, then they just fill it with beer that they brought with them, before they hand it back to you?
Do they eat the glass?
The bar engulfed in flames because the software tester can't handle how real the real customer's question is
congratulations you got the joke
@@pup64hcpthe bar goes up in flames
@@pup64hcp wait I thought it was because it was the one thing the tester _didn't_ test and as such the results weren't confirmed to make sure that wouldn't happen
@@eyweiuaiyeah, that’s actually what the joke is.
As a programmer, you’ll never believe what we won’t consider testing. It’s why beta testers are so wildly important when they’re a real, normal user.
@@JF-um3wz What don't you consider testing? I'm genuinely curious
The software tester walks into the bar again and asks where the bathroom is. Nothing happens.
Reminds me of a post by a developer about the weirdest reports they got from gametesters. The one featured was something along the line of: "If you stand up on the corner on this outer ledge of that building, where you can only get to by parcouring up 4 stories on the invisible 1 Pixel topology ledges in the walls of the alleyway next to it, and look up into the sky at 46° vertical in north west direction, you are sent flying and eventually get shunted off the map."
Their response: "Good catch, but HOW ON EARTH did you get the idea to even test that?!" 🤣
Do you know the blog that that comes from?
@@jawredstoneguy6058 I do believe I saw it in one of those Reddit compilations. Probably either by Kalbus or Emkay. Not entirely sure though, it's been a good while
"Because i could"
"Good answer!"
Speedrunners during beta huh?
@@BobOrKlaus I mean, sounds like the shit speedrunners would be up to - so, very much possible 😄
From the tiny amount I know about software, I’m pretty sure this is 110% accurate
It is.
It is.
I read about this one racing game(i cant remember the name) where the developers made it so if the car was moving forward, and you hit the brake button the car would slow down. Seems alright, right?
However people soon figured out that the brakes didnt work at all if you were driving in reverse. On top of that, you could even exceed the top speed of that car because in the program probably everything had been coded assuming the car is moving forward.
Really goes to show how you have think from every scenario when coding
Honestly I didn't get the funny until the "regular customer walks into the bar"
Gamers, it's always gamers breaking stuff lmao.
@@catpokerlicense big rigs over the road racing?
In addition to the billion other bugs, the trucks have normal acceleration while in reverse and zero diminishing returns or cap.
I don't remember if the brakes work or if this is achieved by hitting the gas to go forward, but all reverse velocity can also be instantly dropped to 0. Meaning you can go 4x the speed of light in reverse (you go so fast you just leave the map and drive around a white out of bounds void) and then instantly and disorienting come to a complete stop
Error on line 17: Accuracy value exceeds set bounds (110%)
Another tester walks into the bar. "Hey guys it's Josh, welcome to Let's Game It Out." The rest is history
The *bar is history.
Suddenly. The bartender found themselves covered in beer that Josh had somehow purchased for free. Then Josh proceeded to talk to the bartender for four hours while they were both engulfed in the drinks, somehow making a sum of a million dollars.
Then the entire world stopped, and it all went black.
Josh had crashed the game.
Let's game it out phases into bar. He asks for "infinite beers until the bar blows up". Then when it does blow up, he returns to it once it's fixed and tears time space continuum to somehow make himself the richest man in the world just using your bar equipment. Josh then uses excessive anount of mentos and cola and blows up your bar with a part of america
i would not want to live in such a world. it would be like hell, but worse
Josh: Hey there it's Josh, welcome back to Let'sGameItOut. Ah yes, 'bar simulator,' the game where you can get infinite money by ordering beers.
Customer: What does that mean?
Bartender: Lost count how many times this happens. I at least know it's so much I let it slide at this point. Him though, first time seeing him. Let's see how he'll do his shenanigans.
To those who dont get the joke: when programmers code they usually expect their code to only be used in a few ways, so when testing its important to try and think of "edge cases" (particularly odd inputs) that the user might make. Things like large numbers, negative numbers, and strings of characters are common kinds of inputs you might expect, but programmers often find users do simple things with their programs that should have been accounted for but never were thought of (think of like pressing the back button after submitting your login info, a website might have a tough time for a moment dealing with the unexpected input). (edit: these kinds of unexpected inputs often can lead to crashing or severely unexpected behavior. Speedrunners are good examples of people who learn to use things like this in unexpected ways. For example in ocarina of time speedrunners have learned to use bush, pot, and butterfly data combined with loading zones to give themselves free items, if done correctly, though they can crash if they mess up.)
That explains the ending
The main thing OoT speedrunners use that glitch for is to give themselves the Shadow and Spirit Medallions early, which is the only thing the game checks for when deciding whether to load the Light Arrow cutscene. If you have the Shadow and Spirit Medallions, you obviously should have all the other Medallions required to unlock their temples, right?
@@DrRank another case of simple software design decisions that led to unexpected results.
@@1forge2rulethemall88 I had a simple IT class where it was just Python calculators I was programming, I decided to go above and beyond what the teacher suggested as far as code, and added three times as much to deal with all possible types of foolishness my brother could pull off. With messages before a reset to initial execution state being along the lines of "user is error" or "I'm a calculator not your girlfriend." For this clip or scenario the programmer should go back in and either expand into having a working restroom system, or have the bartender say it's out of order and point to a sign over a door.
For years always wondered the point of this joke, and you finally gave it a closure explanation. Cheers. I'll pay you a -526436/554*2 beers when we ever meet.
His mistake was not checking to make sure the entire map was generated properly before interacting with an npc
I loved the original, even better with your animation. Nice work.
Now that was a accurate representation of quantum mechanics
What part?
@@lemonlordminecraft
What not part? It all seems pretty quantum mechanic-y to me
@@lemonlordminecraft I generally meant the unnatural things happening, but I guess you could interpret this video as different outcomes of measurements of a particle in superposition. If you imagine this all happening at the same time this could very well be a representation of superposition itself too. Im not studying Quantum mechanics yet tho, so my answer could be wrong.
@@Geolijon i thought the whole thing was supposed to be about testing edge cases and different inputs in software or video games, less so quantum mechanics
@@guy5678 Probably, Im neither an expert in quantum mechanics, nor in programming.
lovin' this 3D style, with the faint diagonal lines and low framerate. it's got the vibe of an indie VR game. love it
more like a ps1 game with high resolution textures
That second whammy at the end there caught me off guard somehow.
Software code is not a science, it is an an art that sometimes morphs into a lovecraftian horror that will drive you insane attempting to figure out WHY it is breaching all known laws of logic and syntax.
There is also no level of testing, in any field, industry, or application, be it software related or not, that can 'customer-proof' a product. It's why you occasionally see some really weird illustrated warning labels.
this is why you have the community test your game for you, an entire community can find more bugs than just one person
You can inspect a thing all you like, but putting it in the water is a surefire way to find the leaks. And there are some things you can't test for without putting strain on the system.
the idea of someone needing to crawl into an area to test and make sure it works seems absurd
but after watching the BL2 boss spawn trigger break because a challenge runner was moving too slowly i dont know what to trust anymore
As an electrical engineering student I laugh, and then realize the horrors that await me.
Is EE fun? What would you say are the pros and cons?
@@cherrycat5599 I'd say it's pretty fun. BLUF: "oh yeah it's worth it, if you're strong enough "
The cons are that for the first two years if academia you're not really going to be learning EE, ECE,. It's a lot of math, infact, in my particular degree, you'd take at least two higher education math courses per semester for those two years. Additionally, quantum physics shows up!
The pros are, you get to learn higher education math and quantum physics! Which might sound unattainable but a good degree plan will set you up for success. And with youtube, chat gpt(caution with that one), khan academy etc, and whatever other institutional resources you might have it's really kinda worth it. Assuming you're not working and have the money for tuition, bills, food etc. (But that's a rant for another topic)
I've done about two classes I'd say are actually engineering, but some of the supporting class are absolutely worth it. Next semester will be when every class will be engineering and for the rest of my time at university.
"Ah sweet, manmade horrors that are within my scope of comprehension!"
Duuude, exactly! Testers are testing like the main features, then a random person tries to do something they thought might/should/must work and everything is now in flames
god i love your animations, 2d + 3d always mesmerizes me
This is a fantastic animation of one of my all-time favorite internet posts...
The slow eyebrow raise at the millions of beers was such a nice touch.
Literally my favorite version of the meme
When you back out using your browser and not the designated back button.
"Don't ToUcH THAAAAÀEEEEeeeeeettttttt"
And then as soon as the tester tries to replicate what happened, it works completely fine, and the next fifteen hours are spent trying to figure out if the glitch was a one-time fluke or if the code has to be torn apart to fix one line of code
I had one of these on a data entry screen back in 1999 - we kept trying to reproduce the error, with no luck. Following their steps never failed. As it was a remote client, we finally asked the client PM to sit with the user and record exactly what they did - turns out that one field had no onClick action set. We couldn't find it because everyone on our team tabbed from field to field (the "obvious" fastest way through the screen) while the user took their hand off the keyboard to mouse from field to field... 🙄😂
To add insult to injury... We asked them to screenshot the error. When they finally did, and e-mailed it to us, we were shocked that the file was megabytes of data. Rather than use Shift-Prtscrn (or whatever the command was), they had used a digital camera to shoot a picture of the screen, then sent it to us in highest detail and colour in a non-compressed image format, probably bmp 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
As a tester myself, I can confirm this is beyond accurate
Everything about this video is so lovingly crafted. The Jeanie voiceover is just the cherry on top of this bizzarely great cake
He forgot about √-4 beers to test imaginary values
0 / 0 beers
As the bar i can confirm that i go up in flames every time someone asks for the bathroom
As a personal game developer, I can say that this is what it feels like to have something small break everything
It is great that bartender have a great taste in art, love that Blender painting on the wall.
The bar went up in flames because the development team added weird coupling between the gas lines ordering system
End users make the best testers, even if they don't enjoy it.
this is some fucking impressive shading work. i'm still in shock over the cat guy- expressions aside, how did you _do_ that? it doesn't look like grease pencil to me, i imagine it's some geometry node wizardry- but then how is his outline offset like that without drawing the part that his body would cover? and how do some of the lines draw over, but not others? i have so many questions
Pretty sure it’s 3d animation, not drawn
@@14deadratsinatrenchcoat i am talking in the context of 3d animation (e.g. geometry nodes, blender's grease pencil)
@@riffmond ah, I only just started trying out blender so I wasn’t aware those things existed
You do not get enough attention, these animations are amazin!
The bartender’s expressions are so simple but so good. And very cute!
Wonderful! This should definitely be a series of yours I think it would do real well.
I guess they could foresee someone ordering a million years, but didn’t program an answer to where the restroom is.
Finally someone animated that meme, I love it
I saw someone do a TF2 SFM animation but it wasn't as good.
This is not only brilliant and true, but the animation is really fun and cool to watch
ok I love the design of the cat guy. they actually look like a sketch on paper in a 3d space
The cat is confused, but goes along with it.
This is by far the best walks into a bar jokes I've ever seen lol
I love how even everything before the punchline is hilarious
he forgot to test if you could take the beer and leave as before the bartender asks for his money.
He didn't test if he could duplicate any of the beers by crouch-jumping on top of them at a precise 32° angle while holding a book in his left hand while leaving the right empty.
idk why but i love your almost 2d characters there just charming that despite being almost cardboard flat they are still very much alive
Yoooo, I've seen iterations of different takes on this audio clip. First time finding your channel. Suuuuper neat art style; this is great!!
I love the paper fox model you did, looks dope
No offense to software folks out there, your job is tough, but I will literally scream the next time I'm told you tested something so it's fine but the physical application you made it for doesn't even use that feature
If you ask for a better tailpipe on your bicycle you shouldn't be surprised when you get a better tailpipe on your bicycle.
So that's not on the testers, that's primarily on the one who requested the change and secondarily on the product owner or whoever is supposed to confirm the design with the requester. Too many developers forget to check with the customer if this is actually what they want.
This is legit what being a DM feels like in D&D. you prepare for EVERYTHING and they still find a way to do something you weren't expecting
He Can’t Make Up His Mind
this is perfect encapsulation of testing versus real product usage.
As a playtester I can confirm this is accurate.
and that, my friends, is how therac-25 was born.
This joke and video is so good that it passed QA standards.
"I think I got everything"
_Nope_
"Goddammit, how did that slip by me?"
_Repeat 100 times_
this animation style is just eyecandy!
remember kids, whenever possible have an exit condition defined. In case your bar goes up in flames.
Insane how fast you can pump these out. Keep it up man :]
10/10 would hire this software tester again. this was amazing
I love how terrified the bartender looks when the tester orders 9999999 beers.
Ah, the limits of unit tests...
he didn't test leaving the bar
the way he just
slides
Software tester asks for ++bears
Bartender starts to cry
There is no software testing that can account for a user dropping a donut on their mouse.
As a bar myself I can confirm that I go up in flames
love how the bar looks like the one in family guy
It’s true it happened I was the guy sitting at the table just off camera I was there
A software tester walks into a bar. Ouch.
OH MY GOSH, ZEUREM IS ACTUALLY 3D NOW!!1
This pretty much sums up the logic of my dreams, albeit with less eldritch beings, impossible concepts, and non-Euclidean geometry.
Oh, I see the issue here. See, you got the script function synchronized with the fireEvent_4 function, which makes sense when you're thinking that, 'hey I want the saloon to go up in flames too!' but where normally you have ent_Fire activate only when P_1 activates the cutscene trigger, this case its activated when someone asks a certain phrase. The command function for that has the same name has the fireEvent_4 function, which I'm guessing is a joke about Taco Bell or smth. Just change the name there, re-create the function and deal with all the bugs that creates. Hope I could help!
That cat is adorable
A software tester walks into a bar
He has phased out of the bar
I love the bartender, they look adorable
This is my new favorite joke
Amazing work on the video it killed me 😂
A software tester will find the limits of your program. A real world test will find the things you never thought to program.
Oh my god it finally happened. It got animated!
100% accurately. I can confirm bars go in flames when I ask where the bathroom is.
Fox dude is very cute more of him pls
It took me aditional 30 seconds after the video ended to get the joke
One time i had to reprogram a printer and for the start up it had to heat up the ink to idk 30 degrees or something so i had the code go if inktemp == 30;
Inkheat = false
And i had it check every ten seconds so it wouldn't be slowed down but i didn't expect it to hit them go over 30 degrees so after heating it up too long it exploded
That....was actually kind of an obvious flaw and an easy fix too. Even if you didn't think it was likely to go over 30 degrees you would still be safer with >= 30 there.
At least you won't forget that again, I guess.
@@xn85d2ha I did realize that after the fact
I really like the design of the bartender
how is bro even gonna drink the beers
I LOVE THIS ART SYTLE ESPECIALLY THE 1440X1080, THE EXPRESSIONS ARE SO FLUID!
Lol kewl.
Now do a backflip into a bar.
The tester trying everything to eventually have a normal user to zip down his pants and everything dies, just like irl
Great animation
And then the Spiffing Brit gets 6.022x10^23 beers for 37 cents
Is that the último tvnauta!?
Literalmente fue lo primero que pense
Another Customer walks into the bar, his first words were "Hey there it's Josh..."
So true
A tourist walks into the bar, glances around, and then wanders out again.
Oh, great, now we have a memory leak...
Yoo
Makes me think of the very first Beta test for the game Palia in which every tester decided to see how many pies they would have to bake before the game crashed.