@@ruthbashford3176 Ruth, there are so many avenues with regard to the swipe card data, the extra door on the Neonatal Ward with no swipe card device, the unsecured door to the courtyard from the Neonatal Ward and let's throw in the Hospital Security Breach relating to the unsecured roof hatch for good measure. A good lawyer could build a solid argument based on those things. I could go on and on. Great observations !
The Devil is in the details in this case. So much depends on the medical and scientific evidence too, that equally doesn't stand up to scrutiny! Thank you for your efforts, in the end, it really will be the truth, however ugly, that sets Lucy free.
Some of the personnel assisting with the investigation were drafted in who had worked on the Victorino Chua's case. Another very concerning case where a male nurse was convicted of murdering patients with insulin.
@@julieyates405 I was looking at the case simply because of the IV bag MO. Didn't give it much thought after that. However, I think the reasons for me looking at that case, was trying to use a comparison strategy to the LL case. I have briefly entertained the idea there may have possibly been a copycat to that case. Maybe someone could have had an opportunity to enter the Countess, to harm those babies. Still would not rule out that possibility.
@ It crossed my mind someone could be trying to frame Lucy but on deeper investigation there’s serious concerns about the reliability of the lab results. A lot of work has been done around this we should share with you. One of the biggest problems may have been the lack of oversight and input from a neonatologist and largely absent paediatricians.
@julieyates405 I understand the lab results issue. That seems to be covered by the experts who have come forward. Not sure about the potential framing of LL though. You would have to sell me in that one. The Neonatalogist is new to me. The Paediatricians not making rounds when they were assigned? I assume you have solid information on that?
Multiple flaws in this entire case! These police actually got an award for investigating this case?😳 Hope they’re forced to return it with the shame they deserve! Staff were “discouraged”from giving evidence for LL?
Travel to and from the court provided whilst friends of Lucy receive a a warning from the trust that if they support her it would be career ending event. The more these idiots talk the more they hang themselves. The latest is that she is being interviewed with regard other "murders" that she may have been involved in elsewhere.
![Method Writing: The First Four Concepts - Jack Grapes [FULL INTERVIEW]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ba9jAVzADY0/mqdefault.jpg)
You raise a lot of good points here which show clearly the many flaws in the investigation. Great work.
@@SuperBoomslang Thank you!
Over 8yrs before trial
Horrible!
Thanks OMF
@@tasha24-7 You are welcome. Thank you for commenting and as always, thank you for watching!
Lucy Letby is innocent, this investigation is like a travelling clown show. Thank you for your input.
@@AngelaMcKavanagh You are welcome. Thank you for watching!
@@AngelaMcKavanagh you are absolutely right, the clowns are going to trip over their big feet anytime soon!
Massive collusion and massive MoJ.
@@John-p7i5g Thank you for watching!
I would think getting the swipe card data wrong would be enough for an appeal on its own, there's no way of knowing where Lucy Letby actually was.
@@ruthbashford3176 Ruth, there are so many avenues with regard to the swipe card data, the extra door on the Neonatal Ward with no swipe card device, the unsecured door to the courtyard from the Neonatal Ward and let's throw in the Hospital Security Breach relating to the unsecured roof hatch for good measure. A good lawyer could build a solid argument based on those things. I could go on and on. Great observations !
Thankyou for your excellent analysis
@karenwall8643 You are welcome. Thank you for watching!
How can you sign out when the card machine was on the outside of the door for signing in.
Its impossible
Very true!
Oh yes! 😮👍 📚 🇺🇸
@@WesleyWattley-xy4fg Thank you for commenting and as always, thank you for watching!
@OperationMerlinFalcon salute
The Devil is in the details in this case. So much depends on the medical and scientific evidence too, that equally doesn't stand up to scrutiny! Thank you for your efforts, in the end, it really will be the truth, however ugly, that sets Lucy free.
@@julieyates405 Thank you!
Some of the personnel assisting with the investigation were drafted in who had worked on the Victorino Chua's case. Another very concerning case where a male nurse was convicted of murdering patients with insulin.
@@julieyates405 Just a little familiar with that case. It's been a while since reading articles on the case.
@OperationMerlinFalcon it's another one some are concerned about...
@@julieyates405 I was looking at the case simply because of the IV bag MO. Didn't give it much thought after that. However, I think the reasons for me looking at that case, was trying to use a comparison strategy to the LL case. I have briefly entertained the idea there may have possibly been a copycat to that case. Maybe someone could have had an opportunity to enter the Countess, to harm those babies. Still would not rule out that possibility.
@ It crossed my mind someone could be trying to frame Lucy but on deeper investigation there’s serious concerns about the reliability of the lab results. A lot of work has been done around this we should share with you.
One of the biggest problems may have been the lack of oversight and input from a neonatologist and largely absent paediatricians.
@julieyates405 I understand the lab results issue. That seems to be covered by the experts who have come forward.
Not sure about the potential framing of LL though. You would have to sell me in that one.
The Neonatalogist is new to me.
The Paediatricians not making rounds when they were assigned? I assume you have solid information on that?
A lot of overtime fr the team
I am sure it was.
Multiple flaws in this entire case!
These police actually got an award for investigating this case?😳
Hope they’re forced to return it with the shame they deserve!
Staff were “discouraged”from giving evidence for LL?
@@JulieLevinge Your are correct about all of that. It's totally and utterly embarrassing from my perspective.
Give us the evidence
@@23davil Thank you!
Travel to and from the court provided whilst friends of Lucy receive a a warning from the trust that if they support her it would be career ending event.
The more these idiots talk the more they hang themselves.
The latest is that she is being interviewed with regard other "murders" that she may have been involved in elsewhere.
@@cybertraining Thank you for the information.
@@cybertraining Thank you for commenting and thank you for watching.
The House of Lords had a debate about the state of maternity services, which is very telling. ruclips.net/user/liveWo5nGtheLA0?si=aqq7Ebc5G1Do_TkA
Thank you for the information.
Give us the evidence