And Ramiz Raja sir had an accident with boundary board while fielding...sad...Those were days Ind Pak matches were too furious....Love from india...india Pak always brothers
I cant forget this match. I had an off from college to watch this match. But could watch only 15 overs as my grand mother died in front of my eyes at home. 😢😢
Well there were great moments for all superstars likes of Martin crow, Sachin, jhonty to name a few but Aqib Javed also played vital part at crucial phases. Specially That wicket of Greatbtach in semifinal was a Dimond otherwise NZ were eyeing 300 which would have been an impossible chase for Pakistan. Greatbatch was looking dangerous that day. Love CWC 1992😍😘
Hello friend U missed to tell fielding king johnty ( I kept a superb blowup still picture of johntyrhodes who was laying horizontalyl in the air) and u also missed kiwis marauding captain Martin crow
Pakistan looked dreadful and WI cruised to victory, to think they would win the WC. But it was a treat to see Lara, you can see the pure class, he simply looks majestic!
Carribians also gave up a good chance in 1987 wc sf birth ( Walsh did not use mankad out to salim jaffer if he did it wI would got semi-final birth might won wc also )
It's a decent knock by Ramiz. Cricket used to be tough before mid 1990s - and West Indies were like the Brazil(Soccer) of International Cricket at that time - from 1980 to 1995,they never lost a test series anywhere in the world. Though it's a bit selfish,it's unfortunate to see so many jingoistic comments from Pakistani fans regarding this knock.
نھیں غلط بات اگر آپ دیکھ لیں خاص کر سیمی فائنل اور فائنل غور سے دیکھ لیں کہ پاکستانی ٹیم نے کتنی محنت کی تھی بہت مشکل ٹارگٹ تھی ان تیز وکٹوں پر پھر خاص کر فائنل میں جب کے دو وکٹ 18 رنز پر گرے تھے جب عمران خان اور میانداد نے وکٹ کو سنبھالا ورنہ پرنگل سمال بوتھم ڈی فریٹس نے اچھی اٹیک اس کے اوپر کیا تھا
Dipak B.C. Lara was a peerless Batsman in the class of very few greats of the era. Javed was talented & a fighter but Lara was natural talent like many other WI players.
@@midshipsport : Indian or not I find Pak 92 win a 100% credit to the rain gods and the one who set its rules for rain washed matches. Best WC has to be Sri Lanka 96 and even 82 if not the recent Eng win
@@manojshetty4 yes for sure. The rain intreviened in the 80 all out match vs ENg and vs S.A... yeah true.. but this team continued playing well and won a lot for series tests and odi all around the world.
lara's knock in that game presented inkling of what the cricketing world going to witness. I clearly remember that game. We, the friends of NIVH Dehradun had been gripped by the world cup mania. I was in 8th standard. We used to get fascinated when Desmond haynes would score hundred. We wandered who would surpass Desi. We were bit disappointed as Haynes missed hundred but enjoyed the Windiz comprehensive victory.
Sorry, but I watch this match live in 1992. Ramiz Raja was considered one of the attacking batsman in those times. This innings although seems slow to you but watching it live in those days "was not that slow". It was a good innings. If Pakistan had won then it would be considered man of the match effort. trust me.
This a match where all my favorites are playing accept IMRAN khan. Wasim Alram, Kaved Miandad, Inzi,C.Ambrose, R.Richardson, C.Hooper, M.Marshal and my special boy the best batsman of the world B.R.Lara. What a match it was 🌸
Imran khan should have took Salem jaffer for Waqar younus and Asif Mujtaba for saeed Anwar but he too a lot of inexperienced to put all batting pressure on Javaid Mindad. If Ijaz Ahamed bowled more than 5 hours Salem jaffer was an excellent bowler .
1996 cricket world cup is the most unique world cup ever played among the 19 cricket world cups till date ( including 7 T20 world cups). Below are few facts : 1. Only world cup to be won by a co-host nation. Sri Lanka won final in Lahore and not on home soil 2. Only final in which both captains were left handed batsman 3. Only final match to be held in pakistan 4. Pakistan is the only country which hosted a world cup final without hosting a semi final match !!!! 5. Only final to have a century in a success full chase. Arvinda di silva scored 107. 6. Only time world cup trophy was handed over by head of a state. Benazir bhutto the then PM of Pakistan handed over the trophy to arjuna ranatunga. 7. 1996 world cup is the only tournament in which both finalists despite being in the same group never faced each other in earlier stages of the tournament. Australia did not go to sri lanka for its pool game due to security reasons and sri lanka was given 2 default points 8. Arvinda di silva is the most productive man of match player with 107 runs 3 wickets n 2 catches 9. Sanath jayasurya is the least productive all rounder to win player of series award 10. Only world cup final among the 4 final match appearances of Glen McGrath where he went wicketless 11. Only 50 over world cup match till date in which sri lanka beat Australia 12. Only World cup when India played at Eden Gardens Calcutta in 50 over world cup !!!! 13. Only 50 over world cup in which West indies lost a semi final match 14. 1996 was the last time West indies reached semi final stage in 50 over world cup 15. Ind vs Sri Lanka semi final, only test or odi in history which was awarded due to rioting crowd !! 16. Only World Cup in sub continent when India did not host the final match. 17. Only World Cup final in which Glen McGrath and Shane warne went wicketless
In my opinion Lara nd Saeed Anwar in same class as a batsman each player has his positive and negatives... Saeed possessed varied ranges of cricketing strokes in his repertoire too
Only against India and Sri Lanka and in Sharjah never played well against Australia southafrica ,mohd Yusuf and inzamam were great batsman scored run every where
Don't compare Brian Charles Lara with Anwar. Lara is incomparable with any asian cricketers his knock 277 in Aus 400 in eng 200 in sl 375 in eng 9 double tons .... Sachin dis not score 200 in Lanka S
@@chaudhrykhalidparvez5772 j.ghngn. G5. Gj t. T jt5 jt.ngngj.j.yhjyh5g jv5Tj5j.yjt.jt5t. T. Yh 5th5 .jtjy t. H gh it 5 5.jkty gj.tj.5. H. 5.y . 5ttj.j.jtjtyv ybytb I . the tbtj.yy.j.nuk I ku jt . Y t tu.jt.jty.t. B t. U j.t....ytv y 5 tj5 j.. t. Tj5jh5..5t
@@sk-4464 it was the strategy of thise times, a opening batsmen like ramiz raja, ravi shastri should stay and play as many as balls he could so that ball is dried up and it will be easy for next batsmen though many times this startergy turned out to be disastrous.
Don't blame Rameez Raja for his slow inning as it was an old fashioned cricket in 1992. As Miandad said in the end 220 or 230 is a fighting total. Just watch Sachin inning in 2011 wc semi final and then blame Rameez.
Even Tony Greig and David Gower repeatedly said that he had batted slow during the commentary then what makes anyone say it was attacking. He scored 49 of 115 balls before he picked up. Had he scored his 50 of 75 balls as was the norm back then , Pakistan could easily have scored 40-45 runs more for the loss of 2 wickets
Sachin played like that becoz india lost back to back wickets and dhoni, raina were only batsmen left, but here rameez playing slow is totally useless.
Cricket was at its best, batters were not butchers, bowlers had some thing to offer, and above all batsmen had to earn their runs but running hard. Now cricket is more like base ball. I simply don't understand what will be the ultimate fate of this game. It has lost its balance in favour of batsmen. Importance of running between the wickets is way less these days
@@deepchatterjee5123 consolation retired hurt it was , I still remember world cup 92 , that was the series made 3 of the greats of 90s , lara , sachin , inzi , except that stupid rule of rain , and who ever won or lost 92 world cup was the best world cup by a margin massive playing areas what atmosphere it was
@@javedsultan4830 the fielding restriction were there in that world cup for the first 15 overs , ''By 1992, only two fielders were allowed outside the circle in the first fifteen overs, then five fielders allowed outside the circle for the remaining overs. This was shortened to ten overs in 2005, and two five-over powerplays were introduced, with the bowling team having discretion over the timing for both.''
I couldn't believe this pakistani team won that world cup with the presence of ramiz raja in the team what a selfish player he was he played only for his hundred he make his hundred on 158 balls
Anybody might say everything but honestly that's the startegy every nation employed during those days we can't blame Rameez for his slow batting on the contrary to score century in Australian bouncy fast track at least appreciate that also brothers
Very slow and defensive start of Pakistani cricket team. That was pakistani first match of world Cup 1992. I still remember West indies won by 10 wickets I think and Laura injured by wasim akram's yorker.
Not that I defend Rameez's scoring rate, but to put it into context at the time, run scoring strategies were transitioning with the old school tactics employed by the likes of Pakistan, Australia etc being challenged by the innovative pinch-hitting NZ introduced. Rameez's strike rate was no worse that many other opening batsmen of the time. Boon's 100 against WI was off 146 balls. In the end, Pakistan's tactics were effective enough to win the cup but today, their run scoring strategy of play slow early and go berserk at the end with wickets in hand would not win them many, if any, matches.
Many compared the West Indian team of the 1970s with Steve Waughs team of Invincibles of the late 90s. I believe Australia had the edge solely because of Shane Warne.The greatest leggie of all time!
West Indian team of 1980's was the best because their bowling and batting were the best. West Indian batsmen would have pulped Warne! Tendulkar had done it .
I never thought Ramiz could ever score century against anybody but score a century in that wc and against West indies team of that era was real badge of honor ...there were hardly any centuries scored in that wc.
In this world cup,Pakistan were in a must-win situation in their final group match against New Zealand to reach the semi final..NZ had won all their previous 7 group games and nobody gave PAK a chance.and It was Ramiz who scored 119 not out to beat NZ and help PAK reach the semi final..so it was becoz of Ramiz that PAK actually reached the semi final and then the famous victory...People remember Imran captaincy,Inzamam,Wasim Akram...but fail to remember Ramiz's century that helped PAK reach the semi final..
Sorry, but I watch this match live in 1992. Ramiz Raja was considered one of the attacking batsman in those times. This innings although seems slow to you but watching it live in those days "was not that slow". It was a good innings. If Pakistan had won then it would be considered man of the match effort. trust me.
@@jivlogs2177 Why trust you. We also watched the World Cup and every Tom, Dick and Harry including Tony Greig had the same remarks that with only two wickets down Pakistan should have scored 45-50 more runs and the main culprit in this case was none other than Ramiz
Imran had dumped him. Imran always had a huge favoritism factor whether it be Mansoor Akhtar, Manzoor Elahi, Saleem Jaffer or Inzamam. Only Inzamam's case worked. Saeed was not injured but was not picked, that's why he always holds a grudge against Imran
First time I saw any westendian writhing in pain . Generally it happens with those who play against westendies.I recall this match for Akram's toe crusing yorker too.
hey At The Toss, any chance you've got to upload Sri Lanka vs West Indies wc 1992 match that was played at Berri Oval in Australia, please let me know.
![Gunna - HIM ALL ALONG [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/w7Wf0h1Q8a4/mqdefault.jpg)
Lara full of grace, loved watching him play then Sachin
Sachin waste .Lara best in this wc
@@danielcephas2398 Shut up mc Lara waster....Sachin best in WC
There was simply something magical about the 92 World Cup - it had an unmatched charm about it.
that was the first world cup conducted by ICC (ICC formed in 1991).
Colourful Jersies
First time day night matches in world cup and most coloured clothings.best format.most talented cricketers on display.no clear favorite.
Still my favourite World Cup🏆
@@henrythompson5224 yes mine too as we won it unexpectedly.
Had Ramiz Raja got out early in Pak innings, Pak would have scored 245-250, which was the par score.
Pakistan always had negative players like him. He also used to drop catches in slip-costing test matches to Pakistan.
And Ramiz Raja sir had an accident with boundary board while fielding...sad...Those were days Ind Pak matches were too furious....Love from india...india Pak always brothers
@@PiLaminar6y6666t6tyt6 yyy t
If, but, maybe ????
Javed Miandad was playing 'dil scope' in 1992..A real legend who invented reverse sweep too!
rod marsh even put hiim in his best xi, and Lillee put him in his top 10, that says a lot
javed miandad was an absolute masterclass of batting. he always seemed to have more time than everyone else! beautiful to watch
@RS Nambiar u r correct those days we r cal that botham shot.
Douglas marrilier from Zimbabwe is the real inventor of Scoop shot and not Dilshan and I could see no where Miandad played it .
@@zibtihaj3213 0
Two greatest fast bowler wasim akram and malcom marshal
Ambrose also.
I cant forget this match. I had an off from college to watch this match. But could watch only 15 overs as my grand mother died in front of my eyes at home. 😢😢
😢😢😢😢😢
😭😭😭😭😭
😔😔
Sorry to hear that bro
Very very very sad bro.. May Allah bless her soul..
Brian Lara, Dipak Patel, Mark Greatbatch & ofcouse Inzamam Ul Haq (to name a few) were the heroes of that WC
Even Mushtaq Ahmed
Well there were great moments for all superstars likes of Martin crow, Sachin, jhonty to name a few but Aqib Javed also played vital part at crucial phases. Specially That wicket of Greatbtach in semifinal was a Dimond otherwise NZ were eyeing 300 which would have been an impossible chase for Pakistan. Greatbatch was looking dangerous that day. Love CWC 1992😍😘
@@SUNSID89 AAa
@@SUNSID89 l
Hello friend U missed to tell fielding king johnty ( I kept a superb blowup still picture of johntyrhodes who was laying horizontalyl in the air) and u also missed kiwis marauding captain Martin crow
Malcolm Marshall ..RIP. great Windies bowler of 1980s and early 1990s.
Overrated bowler who bullied average batsmen in his time
Good. S dning. Calton. Imran. Khan. With. Respect
@@offbeatcricket7768 you are a moron
@@offbeatcricket7768That's why he has a career average of 20.🤣
1992 WC that too in coloured clothing and great theme made for my first love for cricket ! 👌🏻👏👍
1992 WC was beginning of cricket fever days and fever slowly decreased after 2003 WC for 80s and middle 90s kids.
Exactly
Yes bro
S
tho
@@praveengr7382 a
Great cricket days with great players
ayaz
Pakistan looked dreadful and WI cruised to victory, to think they would win the WC. But it was a treat to see Lara, you can see the pure class, he simply looks majestic!
Ah
Carribians also gave up a good chance in 1987 wc sf birth ( Walsh did not use mankad out to salim jaffer if he did it wI would got semi-final birth might won wc also )
Pak is really lucky, everything went in their way.
It's a decent knock by Ramiz. Cricket used to be tough before mid 1990s - and West Indies were like the Brazil(Soccer) of International Cricket at that time - from 1980 to 1995,they never lost a test series anywhere in the world. Though it's a bit selfish,it's unfortunate to see so many jingoistic comments from Pakistani fans regarding this knock.
Don t get propaganda here against pakistan.if you can t do good for Pakistan then you don t have right to do bad .
Z
,
1992 ka world cup luck se jeeta Pak New-Zealand ,West Indies aur England zyada acchi team thi us time
England. Vs pak,1992
نھیں غلط بات اگر آپ دیکھ لیں خاص کر سیمی فائنل اور فائنل غور سے دیکھ لیں کہ پاکستانی ٹیم نے کتنی محنت کی تھی بہت مشکل ٹارگٹ تھی ان تیز وکٹوں پر پھر خاص کر فائنل میں جب کے دو وکٹ 18 رنز پر گرے تھے جب عمران خان اور میانداد نے وکٹ کو سنبھالا ورنہ پرنگل سمال بوتھم ڈی فریٹس نے اچھی اٹیک اس کے اوپر کیا تھا
21:48 . . . . . Shot of the Century. God
Sachin did many..
This shot from Brian Lara shocked/ alarmed the world of cricket...
No
Tandulkar odi stikrat 87 not 60
Miandad captained the Pakistani side in this first World Cup ODI of 1992. Rameez faced criticism by Pakistani press for a very slow innings.
Wasim Akram , ahqib Javed all were raw quick bowlers but still Lara managed to score against them easily.
Dipak B.C. Lara was a peerless Batsman in the class of very few greats of the era. Javed was talented & a fighter but Lara was natural talent like many other WI players.
@@muhammadtaazzumalirathore6954 I'm me
CWC'92 The Greatest World Cup ever.
Greatest because Pakistan qualified by fluke?
@@manojshetty4 lol.. yeah... but come on man they had great players... bowlers especially... I am India and I am NOT the left wing liberal 🤣🤣
@@midshipsport : Indian or not I find Pak 92 win a 100% credit to the rain gods and the one who set its rules for rain washed matches. Best WC has to be Sri Lanka 96 and even 82 if not the recent Eng win
@@manojshetty4 yes for sure. The rain intreviened in the 80 all out match vs ENg and vs S.A... yeah true.. but this team continued playing well and won a lot for series tests and odi all around the world.
@@midshipsport Indeed
I always enjoy Wasim Akram bowling he is the best bowler in the world.
lara's knock in that game presented inkling of what the cricketing world going to witness. I clearly remember that game. We, the friends of NIVH Dehradun had been gripped by the world cup mania.
I was in 8th standard. We used to get fascinated when Desmond haynes would score hundred. We wandered who would surpass Desi.
We were bit disappointed as Haynes missed hundred but enjoyed the Windiz comprehensive victory.
3e4e
I vividly remember watching this match highlight with my father....this match was not shown live on TV.... I was 11 years old at that time....
Haynes n Lara what combo .. 👍🤩👍
19:52 102 off 158 balls oh my GOD........Watching Rameez Raja batting used to be a painful experience... but luckily he rarely batted well....
+Asim Zafar hes just as bad as a analyst as he was a cricketer
And he accuses others of being selfish.
+Asim Zafar i thank this was his first century this why take one weak
+James Pitt good point
Sorry, but I watch this match live in 1992. Ramiz Raja was considered one of the attacking batsman in those times. This innings although seems slow to you but watching it live in those days "was not that slow". It was a good innings. If Pakistan had won then it would be considered man of the match effort. trust me.
This a match where all my favorites are playing accept IMRAN khan. Wasim Alram, Kaved Miandad, Inzi,C.Ambrose, R.Richardson, C.Hooper, M.Marshal and my special boy the best batsman of the world B.R.Lara. What a match it was 🌸
Javed '
32.04...... Is best and most divasting yorker I have seen. This is called real Toe Crushers
I remember watching it live and back then, this was one of the ways to mighty Lara out.
upload Sri Lanka vs West Indies match of wc 1992 that was played at Berri Oval, on 13th March 1992 😊.
The loss devastated Pakistan
And made us win the World Cup
HAHAAAAA U KEPT ON LOSING IN2022...ZIMBABWE
Childhood memories me in sixth class watchd it on tv with my late father
None of any world cup has grace, charm & beauty more than the 92 world cup.
99 world cup,96 world cup,2003 world cup
@@anuragsonker9132 After 1992 world Cup, it was 1999 World Cup.
Imran khan should have took Salem jaffer for Waqar younus and Asif Mujtaba for saeed Anwar but he too a lot of inexperienced to put all batting pressure on Javaid Mindad.
If Ijaz Ahamed bowled more than 5 hours Salem jaffer was an excellent bowler .
i was 3 class students but always focus on matches not study..great days
1996 cricket world cup is the most unique world cup ever played among the 19 cricket world cups till date ( including 7 T20 world cups). Below are few facts :
1. Only world cup to be won by a co-host nation. Sri Lanka won final in Lahore and not on home soil
2. Only final in which both captains were left handed batsman
3. Only final match to be held in pakistan
4. Pakistan is the only country which hosted a world cup final without hosting a semi final match !!!!
5. Only final to have a century in a success full chase. Arvinda di silva scored 107.
6. Only time world cup trophy was handed over by head of a state. Benazir bhutto the then PM of Pakistan handed over the trophy to arjuna ranatunga.
7. 1996 world cup is the only tournament in which both finalists despite being in the same group never faced each other in earlier stages of the tournament. Australia did not go to sri lanka for its pool game due to security reasons and sri lanka was given 2 default points
8. Arvinda di silva is the most productive man of match player with 107 runs 3 wickets n 2 catches
9. Sanath jayasurya is the least productive all rounder to win player of series award
10. Only world cup final among the 4 final match appearances of Glen McGrath where he went wicketless
11. Only 50 over world cup match till date in which sri lanka beat Australia
12. Only World cup when India played at Eden Gardens Calcutta in 50 over world cup !!!!
13. Only 50 over world cup in which West indies lost a semi final match
14. 1996 was the last time West indies reached semi final stage in 50 over world cup
15. Ind vs Sri Lanka semi final, only test or odi in history which was awarded due to rioting crowd !!
16. Only World Cup in sub continent when India did not host the final match.
17. Only World Cup final in which Glen McGrath and Shane warne went wicketless
What a classical innings by young Brian Lara that time. Each and every shot of Lara is gem class. Also sloppy fielding by pakistan.
At age 22, you could see the early genius in him
Nice watching 1992 world cup
In my opinion Lara nd Saeed Anwar in same class as a batsman each player has his positive and negatives... Saeed possessed varied ranges of cricketing strokes in his repertoire too
Only against India and Sri Lanka and in Sharjah never played well against Australia southafrica ,mohd Yusuf and inzamam were great batsman scored run every where
Don't compare Brian Charles Lara with Anwar. Lara is incomparable with any asian cricketers his knock 277 in Aus 400 in eng 200 in sl 375 in eng 9 double tons ....
Sachin dis not score 200 in Lanka
S
Laara ko Anwar ke sath compare kar rahe ho😂😂😂 Laara hi anwar’s dadaji anwar is bacha don’t compare with lara
Thanks for the upload..!!
people remember those days chasing a score of 230 was an uphill task. runs were not easy to come.
Fero in bhj
Fero should make
@@chaudhrykhalidparvez5772 j.ghngn. G5. Gj t. T jt5 jt.ngngj.j.yhjyh5g jv5Tj5j.yjt.jt5t. T. Yh 5th5 .jtjy t. H gh it 5 5.jkty gj.tj.5. H. 5.y . 5ttj.j.jtjtyv ybytb I . the tbtj.yy.j.nuk
I ku jt . Y t tu.jt.jty.t. B t. U j.t....ytv y 5 tj5 j.. t. Tj5jh5..5t
*
Rules were different and bowling class was much better
I remember seeing Ramiz play in odi was like watching grass grow
Through this world cup we find Lara, Wasim, Tendulkar, Inzimam and many other good players
Wasim akram was already a big name before this worldcup.
Ajay Jadeja
Amazing to see how thin inzamam was in 92 and how quickly he ran for the runs
Lara is the greatest batsman I have ever seen.
Look at javed,s run rate against Ambrose Marshall.89 plus.real modern master.
1st time I seen j miandad the great legend playing v fast
@@naeemfahad4897 Then it tells you pretty much have seen very little cricket
Raja anchored the innings. It was a good show of batting , except it was somewhat slow.
somewhat slow? it essentially lost pakistan the game
@@sk-4464 it was the strategy of thise times, a opening batsmen like ramiz raja, ravi shastri should stay and play as many as balls he could so that ball is dried up and it will be easy for next batsmen though many times this startergy turned out to be disastrous.
raja is one of the most successfull opner in the cricket history of pakistan.really classical nd stylish batsman.
yeah i just saw that....i wouldn't want a century that is this slow.
Javaid miadad was the one superstar in Pakistan team look his fighting batting than Rameez Raja
Ramiz raja won this match.. Hahaha.. well deserving man of the match title inngs.
Don't blame Rameez Raja for his slow inning as it was an old fashioned cricket in 1992. As Miandad said in the end 220 or 230 is a fighting total. Just watch Sachin inning in 2011 wc semi final and then blame Rameez.
Ammad Hassan sachin was dropped 4 times in that innings
Even then Sachin's inning was slow and he was caught out in the same fashion.
Even Tony Greig and David Gower repeatedly said that he had batted slow during the commentary then what makes anyone say it was attacking. He scored 49 of 115 balls before he picked up. Had he scored his 50 of 75 balls as was the norm back then , Pakistan could easily have scored 40-45 runs more for the loss of 2 wickets
Sachin played like that becoz india lost back to back wickets and dhoni, raina were only batsmen left, but here rameez playing slow is totally useless.
Lara class distinction
that was the team who won world cup 1992 .. it was 100% Imran khan who lead them hero ..
MARSHALL was a world-famous fast bowler then, but how could he bowl without slips, at least one ...
Cricket was at its best, batters were not butchers, bowlers had some thing to offer, and above all batsmen had to earn their runs but running hard. Now cricket is more like base ball. I simply don't understand what will be the ultimate fate of this game. It has lost its balance in favour of batsmen. Importance of running between the wickets is way less these days
Rameez raaja 116 ball fifty same as test march
If Haynes scores 90 playing 145 balls, Ramirez innings justifies.
cause on the other end lara was blasting us all over the place . so he kept his head down.
@@muks09 per baad me lara pe wasim ne blast kar diya
@@deepchatterjee5123 consolation retired hurt it was , I still remember world cup 92 , that was the series made 3 of the greats of 90s , lara , sachin , inzi , except that stupid rule of rain , and who ever won or lost 92 world cup was the best world cup by a margin massive playing areas what atmosphere it was
There were not much fielding restrictions those days and field was spread out and batsmens strike rate was much lower than present day
@@javedsultan4830 the fielding restriction were there in that world cup for the first 15 overs , ''By 1992, only two fielders were allowed outside the circle in the first fifteen overs, then five fielders allowed outside the circle for the remaining overs. This was shortened to ten overs in 2005, and two five-over powerplays were introduced, with the bowling team having discretion over the timing for both.''
I still remember this match between wistindes Vs Pakistan through radio Pakistan communatary husssain Jalil chasthi mujid English communatary
Only ramiz raja is responsible for this defeat although he scored a slow century
Commentator said batsman paradise pitch otherwise it would have been difficult to score against Malcolm Marshall.Devastating bowler of 80's
Ek dum good
Lara showed his Master class in very young age, Catch miss of Amor Shohail made me entertained
Gajab ka world cup tha kai match bahut achhe hue
Poor starts don't guarantee poor finishes. Never give up!
This game would have to have set a record for least number of wickets to have fallen in a completed match
Hollywoo
Yes it is a record, of completed 100 over match least wickets fallen.
Esp considering the bowling talent on display: Marshall, Ambrose, Wasim, Aaqib
I couldn't believe this pakistani team won that world cup with the presence of ramiz raja in the team what a selfish player he was he played only for his hundred he make his hundred on 158 balls
Ijaz Ahmed the bowler ..wow !!
Anybody might say everything but honestly that's the startegy every nation employed during those days we can't blame Rameez for his slow batting on the contrary to score century in Australian bouncy fast track at least appreciate that also brothers
Very slow and defensive start of Pakistani cricket team.
That was pakistani first match of world Cup 1992.
I still remember West indies won by 10 wickets I think and Laura injured by wasim akram's yorker.
I enjoy RamizRaja batting.I love front foot batsman.In those days I was in school.
What an effort from Ramiz Raja. Had he been out a little earlier, Pakistan might have got a few more runs.
There are no ifs or buts in cricket. Accept defeat!
Even Tony Greig and other commentators didn't like Ramiz innings. Their comments toward the end of the innings somewhat condemned Ramiz's innings.
Not that I defend Rameez's scoring rate, but to put it into context at the time, run scoring strategies were transitioning with the old school tactics employed by the likes of Pakistan, Australia etc being challenged by the innovative pinch-hitting NZ introduced. Rameez's strike rate was no worse that many other opening batsmen of the time. Boon's 100 against WI was off 146 balls. In the end, Pakistan's tactics were effective enough to win the cup but today, their run scoring strategy of play slow early and go berserk at the end with wickets in hand would not win them many, if any, matches.
No mate , he played from 1987 to 1997 the same stingy way. always let me score and let the team lose.
lara is greatest
Many compared the West Indian team of the 1970s with Steve Waughs team of Invincibles of the late 90s. I believe Australia had the edge solely because of Shane Warne.The greatest leggie of all time!
Na that west indies team was the best
Shane warne greatest???
fluke yes
Gilchrist is legend
West Indian team of 1980's was the best because their bowling and batting were the best. West Indian batsmen would have pulped Warne!
Tendulkar had done it .
I am proud💪 to be indian🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
I am a big fan of Sachin and I love and follow Sachinism.....But Brian Lara was the best that can ever happen
Great javed miandad
Javed miandad legend
Gand
21:50 what a shot ! bow down.
Wrist power
People comparing slow run rate, forget that bats those days were not modern bats.
In that match windies treated our bowlers like they r bowling in nets
Waqar Yunis,Ian Bishop and Sharne warne missed this world cup due to injuries
Warne was yet to play a ODI
Desmond hyenz was so reliable to win 2 world cup to West Indies
From India🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
What A Victory
The team who lost round matches in this way and ranked very low won the world cup its unbelievable.. 🤔
23.00 Ian chapel said" not styles as Tendulkar but suddenly has tendulkar's..."😂😂😂
p
23:00
I never thought Ramiz could ever score century against anybody but score a century in that wc and against West indies team of that era was real badge of honor ...there were hardly any centuries scored in that wc.
Century in 158 balls i mean wasting half of the overs😂😂😂😂
I am Indian but IAM not blame by ramiz raja kyoki us samay 100 mushkil se lagte the isliye player ki izzat kijiye na ki blame
I remember exactly where i was when i watched lara got hit on the toe.... as clear as day 26 years later.
Best lara
I am still at stadium
Desmond haynes good player atacer player for de west indies greenge ke,sath haynes ki j9se bhut best
Did anybody see an ODI where only 2 wickets fallen in whole match!!!
Yes many times
yes
@@snvideos8949 Dude don't reply without knowing. Tell me any match like this?
Rameez Raja was one of the slowest players in the world..:)..he was misfit for ODI cricket
In this world cup,Pakistan were in a must-win situation in their final group match against New Zealand to reach the semi final..NZ had won all their previous 7 group games and nobody gave PAK a chance.and It was Ramiz who scored 119 not out to beat NZ and help PAK reach the semi final..so it was becoz of Ramiz that PAK actually reached the semi final and then the famous victory...People remember Imran captaincy,Inzamam,Wasim Akram...but fail to remember Ramiz's century that helped PAK reach the semi final..
Brian lara
Sorry, but I watch this match live in 1992. Ramiz Raja was considered one of the attacking batsman in those times. This innings although seems slow to you but watching it live in those days "was not that slow". It was a good innings. If Pakistan had won then it would be considered man of the match effort. trust me.
Emaad Qureshi 1
@@jivlogs2177 Why trust you. We also watched the World Cup and every Tom, Dick and Harry including Tony Greig had the same remarks that with only two wickets down Pakistan should have scored 45-50 more runs and the main culprit in this case was none other than Ramiz
If Saeed Anwar would hv faced 158 balls then the score would hv been more than 300....I don't know why saeed was not playin instead of raja is dis wc
He was not fit along with Waqar Younis
Not 300 dude but atleat 190 he would have scored
Imran had dumped him. Imran always had a huge favoritism factor whether it be Mansoor Akhtar, Manzoor Elahi, Saleem Jaffer or Inzamam. Only Inzamam's case worked. Saeed was not injured but was not picked, that's why he always holds a grudge against Imran
First time I saw any westendian writhing in pain . Generally it happens with those who play against westendies.I recall this match for Akram's toe crusing yorker too.
I am still at the stadium
West Indies is a hot favorite ...Brian Lara Main Bus Stand
hey At The Toss, any chance you've got to upload Sri Lanka vs West Indies wc 1992 match that was played at Berri Oval in Australia, please let me know.
Jawed the artist....100%strike rate
strangest batting performance of all time by Pakistan (except Miandad). 8 wickets in hand but no effort made accelerate the scoring rate
Hayens and lara super