yeah, they dont deserve to be cooped up in cages just to be looked at and yelled at by little children, or to be hunted for their pelt. it is just rediculous
I saw a creature in jarrahdale on scarp road near the start close to the farm on one afternoon it ran like the feature in this video. Had stripes and a strange face that as it darted close to the bonnet of my car its head was tilted in our direction I distinctly remember it having rings on its black tail. Never seen it again this was almost 7 years ago at least but me and my friend never forget seeing it. Was almost as big as a large dog and has a cat like face and black ears.
Saw one in Barrington Tops NSW. We thought it was a quoll as we had no idea what it was or what a quoll looked like. I did some reasearch to discover other sightings in Barrington/Glouster area. My mind was blown. Everyone who sees these things becomes obsessed because youve encountered something mythical and now magical. Wonderful
@@joaorebochooaw6321 yes thats what i thought as well. I obviously can't confirm it was a thylacine but you tell me what it was, a small panther looking animal with tiger stripes on the base of its back and start of tail
I would love for them to be still around but logically there is no possibility that they are I think what people are seeing are foxes and dingos suffering from Sarcoptic Mange.
If they are still around, maybe it's better we don't find them. After all we exterminated this animal as soon as we got here. Who's to say if we discovered this animal still alive, we wouldn't do it all over again?
Yes. Of course, they would be a little fuzzy and out of focus. Like all Big Foot sightings and others. They have to leave something to the imagination..
Yes, it is amazing that when you stand next to a small enclosure with a movie camera using 8 mm film on a tripod you get a better image than when you stick a small hobby camera or cell phone out of a window during a spontaneous sighting.
Yes. They use camera traps all over the world to track the movements of other endangered species like tigers and leopards. They should use them for this as well. Then we could have some really solid evidence.
That would be too easy. Like Loch Ness and Bigfoot and Aliens, they are too smart for camera traps. Only the nut jobs get to see them and record them on grainy 1912 cameras even though it's 2018 and everyone has a phone camera in their pockets now a days.
I've read that numerous tribal people in Irian Jaya (Indonesian New Guinea) have claimed to have seen them in their high valleys. I hope they are still living......and in several places in Australia, New Guinea, and Tasmania, of course. Beautiful animal.
@@limpan3961 The problem is our species. On every continent the megafauna disappeared shortly after homo sapiens set foot on it for the first time. So yes, we suck :(
@@domenigo97 You and Salem are both wrong. We do cause many extinctions, but most of the time the issue is invasive species we bring. Most of Australia is uninhabited by man today, in the past there were far less people, no way we hunted thylacine to extinction in Australia that's ridiculous. The issue was ancient man brought canids. Dogs directly competed with thylacines, foxes directly competed with thylacine. Canids out competed the marsupials and there is a reason for this. This happened 3 million years ago [before humans] when saber toothed tigers out competed a saber toothed marsupial called thylacosmilus in south America, other carnivorans out competed almost all terror birds. The difference was continental drift brought in invasive species, we brought canids to Australia. Tasmania was a refuge because man did not bring canids to the island, there are no dingoes in Tasmania. They were endangered. As for your assertion that we killed of the great megafauna, the Quaternary extinction is a mystery we do not know the cause. We humans lived with woolly mammoths, woolly rhinos, snow hyenas cave lions etc for 400,000 years of our existence, older human species lived along side them for millions of years yet 12k years ago all of a sudden megafauna around the globe died, most humans died out as well. All the while African rhinos and elephants, which have been around us from the beginning, are still alive!
People killed them because they were protected their sheep. And before even human hunted them down dogs and foxes compete with them which the main factor Tasmanian tiger couldn't keep up By that time they were extinct or so we thought they extinct
Me my mate seen a thylacine run across the road on McEnroe Road Tarpeena sa, out shooting one night, 2002. Its the only one I've seen in all my years out bush, it's Canter across the road was like nothing else.. I'll never forget That wildlife Encounter..
In my experience you often hear wildlife rather than see them. There are well attested ear witness accounts who can describe the call of the Thylacine. Surely if they are breeding near human habitation in Australia there ought to be strange vocalisations as well as sightings? Don't get me wrong, I would love it if they have survived somewhere in the Outback.
Based on marsupial high reproduction rate, and it’s been 70-80 years since supposed extinction, if they’re still alive there’s been plenty of time to repopulate in high numbers, so there should be many more sightings if they’re around.
@@daviddickinson936 You don't need to be a Ph.D to understand why Marsupials have a lower reproductive rate than placental mammals, there's only so much room inside a pouch for young coupled with most marsupials just breeding less frequently A cat can have a litter of 6+ kittens every couple months, most marsupials probably only have a couple small litters a year if even that
Robyn Nagorcka's video is of a fox with mange, with an injured foot. The video from the 70's clearly shows a fox with mange as well. Slow down the video and you will see the last bits of fur still on its tail at the tip.
I took a road trip around Tasmania in 2009 and asked around. Some people I talked to swear they’ve seen it. I also came across something on a late night drive that I couldn’t identify, looked too small to be a thylacine though
If you look at 3:10, you will see that the back legs have a long midsection, and a short lower section. This matches with the good footage available for the creature. For me this is the most important characteristic. So, for me, it looks like the thylacine could still be alive! But my son says it is just a dog...
That's so not a fox, I have heard stories of sightings in 5 states, and seen paw prints that don't match foxes, dingo or feral dogs. I believe they are around just in very small numbers that roam.
Hey Guys, It’s okay, because an Australian university is (was secretly) studying and monitoring a large family of these animals at the top end of far North Queensland. The local indigenous people have known they were there for a very long time. The University has been tracking and monitoring them for about a year now. Thank you.
@@TURK_182 I think it's too wet up there for bush fires, dunno,just guessing it's a lot different in the tropical parts of Australia not so dry,not so many bushfires
Yeah, I'd need I little more evidence, as they would be the first official mainland thylacines in two thousand years, according to science, so I'm slightly sceptical.
Yet others see 2 of those clips as clearly fox, even to the white tip on the blurred tail that those who refuse to observe overlook. First one is a mangy fox with right front paw injured. Last one just a dog or fox. And those are clear records, yet their providers are probably convinced are something different. Common creatures, normal fauna, and not sadly tigers.
Ok, I used to live in SA, and one night my husband and I were driving past southern suburbs that are closer to the bush, and we saw something on the side of the road. I kept on driving, then looked at my husband and asked 'did you see it?' he said 'yes, I did'. It was like a slow action movie, I stopped the car, did u-turn to come back and check that thing again, but nothing was there. So, what we have seen looked like a large cat/leopard/tiger? with long tale, staying still on the side of the road, it was NOT a kangaroo or fox, ok? It was a large animal. Till this day I have no idea what we saw.
@@jayaprakashantherayil8895 I`m not a dude and you need to spend less time on the internet and untrustworthy websites, then you`ll be able to assess critically other people` intellectual abilities prior to asking irrelevant questions or making nonsense assumptions...
It’s a big country mate, and I’m sure they are out there. Me and my mates either saw a ghost of one in the 90’s, sprinting flat out once when in the Western Australian country, won’t say where. But mate we all sat in silence until one of us asked if the other boys saw it , and then we described what we each thought we saw and and concluded eventually what we all saw and all agreed. Stripe and hopping back legs. Like a gallop.
If they are still alive, Just leave them alone until they have a higher enough population where there would be more sightings and eventually officially say they are not dead
I'm not convinced but I'm also not counting out the possibility that Thylacines could still be out there. But my questions is simple: We have fantastic tech these days called trail cams which can be strapped to a tree and photograph anything that triggers it with movement. Why is nobody using them? Or are they, and they just aren't seeing any thylacines?
I'm guessing they are using trail cams, but just like with God, you can't prove a negative. It can always be argued that they simply haven't been filmed by these cameras "yet".
Active--You most certainly can prove a "positive." Right now, scientists, most of them, rule out the possibility of a living, breeding colony of Thylacines. All it will take is one crisp, clear video of one of them, or a body, and we will all be on board for the protection of this species. But it has been many decades since the last one (known) died in captivity in the 30's. Don't get me wrong--I hope Thylacines are still here--but there is no real evidence.
You might have misunderstood what I was trying to convey. I agree with you that they are probably extinct. But a lack of decent video footage will not convince those who desperately want to believe they are still alive.
The problem with game cameras is to cover a *very large area* you you need an *unbelievably large number of game cams,* and *somebody* has to *pay for them.* Plus you have to know *where* to put the cams in the first place. You ALSO have to have dedicated teams to service these cameras in review all the footage caught on them. The money and resources needed to do all that would never be available until it was proven the thylacines still existed, and then you wouldn't need the game cams anyway....
They've been sighted in dense bushland in the Blue Mountains of NSW. There are populations on Tasmania AND the mainland. They'll be fine if we just leave them alone. They aren't scared of us, but they should be!
With the phone interviews, all of his print casts, as well as other people's casts, makes the photos and videos even more substantial. The government should step up and be willing to put a little money behind proving they still exist, because it will be proven, and the government is going to come out of it looking like they were trying to pull a cover-up. Which all governments will try to do with many different things that they don't want the general public to know about.
@A Florida Son 🤣 The idea of Neil's photo and video evidence being "substantial" is truly hilarious!! The way he gets so excited about things that are SO obviously not thylacines is what's got me so convinced that they're extinct, at least outside of New Guinea.
@@AFloridaSon None of the information provided is even slightly convincing. No great conspiracy exists except on the mind of the gullible or misled. The fact fools or ignorant exist among so-called professionals shows problems with education and general knowledge, not that somehow thylacines have hatched on the mainland Australia. They can't even identify foxes and cats. The soliciting of funds from the gullible to pursue this outright falsehood is abhorrent. The funding of reliable research in Tasmania might have merit, and these con-men and fantasisers are not reliable researchers.
@@stephenbrand5661 And people donate funds to keep these spreaders of untruths in beer and toys. The most useful donation would be a childs book with pictures of dogs and foxes and cats.
There have been quite a few sightings in the Southwest of Western Australia. I used to live down there and saw one myself I am sure when out in the bush on motorcycles.
What pathetic and horrible creatures are humans. When they were around, they hunted these magnificent things down to extinction. Now they are desperate for a glimpse.
Man, i'm such a terrible person because animals who slaughtered farm animals were hunted by some old biddies who are probably dead of old age in AUSTRALIA
In France, we have an old legend about a "beast" in the Gévaudan region, which was described as something between a wolf, a lion and a hyena. It is largely accepted today that the beast was a hyena, or maybe a thylcacine, who broke free from the local fair (historians found out that in the region there was a well-known "curiosity zoo" which sold exotic animals).
That thing apparently killed a lot of people. So slightly possible a hyaena (a few have been man killers), but wolf or lion have much more credibility. Thylacine? They killed chickens, not humans.
I read that story, and could say categorically that a thylacine would not have killed so many people, and there is no record in Australia or them killing people not even children. I recall that the animal description in France turned out to be closer to that of a Lion rather than a Hyena, and could also have escaped from a fair to I suppose.
I saw that exact creature just coming out of kersbrook in the adelaide hill didn't have enough time to film I really beleive Tasmanian tigers are still alive
The animal in the video around 2:50 totally looks like a fox suffering from mange. The head looks too big because the hair loss makes the body look smaller than with all the usual fluffiness people are used to. The thylacine has fat tail base/long butt. The tail of the mangy fox in the video is slim at its base. It also runs weirdly because one of its front legs is injured. Look up pictures of hairless cats, guinea pigs, hamsters... all of them seem to have weird proportions but it´s because of the absence of fur, not because their proportions are different from the hairy ones.
Like a lot of things hoped to be around--bigfoot, angels, saucermen--no one has produced any proof. I'm rooting that they find some one day but I'm not holding my breath until that day comes.
Jim Pauff I'm normally a skeptic about things like bigfoot, ufos etc as the so called evidence is usually bullshit or ridiculous CGI effects. This case however seems plausible due to the video footage plus the animal did definitely exist at one time.
@@MichaelWilliams-mo1vv I'd agree with you if the quality of the videos was higher. What I see could be mangy dogs or foxes. I'm rooting for the tiger being around but you have to convince me. It seems to me that the rational thing.
Australia is a continent with 24 mil people on it most of them living in the city's so even if they find alive dinosaurs in Australia it wouldn't be far-fetched.
Us human beings are garbage sometimes the dog should have been in the cage it should have been roaming free forgive us mother nature for what we have done
0:48 , 3:0404:15 video is indeed a real thylacine. The anatomy matches exactly that of a real thylacine. The heel so close to the ground, the pointy tail. During every jump when it's hind legs are in the air you can even see the stripes for the fraction of a second. It's definitely one. But all other vids are definitely just ordinary foxes. Just look at the heels on their legs. They are way to high to be a thylacine and the tail doesn't match that of a thylacine. Is looks exactly how a 🦊 would look like. But on the 0:483:044:15 vid, that looks exactly how a thylacine would look like if you compare the body anatomy of the video, the stripes and the tail to the real Thylacine fossiles, bones, pictures and videos that are left in universities and on the internet from real thylacines. So it's a genuine thylacine on that old video. But that doesn't mean ist still out there today. It just means at the time the old video was shot they were still out there. They could have still died out since then unfortunately. Especially if their population numbers have become to small to stop inbreeding and keep a self sustaining population.
It's very unlikely the last one in captivity was the last one alive... But a tiny remaining population would be inbred and vulnerable. The sightings in the 70s could easily be real... but the numbers would have expanded by now if the species was still going... Could be in PNG
Yes, that makes me doubtfull about these sightings. There's always enough image quality to support the possibility of whatever is shown being the mysterious creature, but not enough to confirm it.
Yeah, pretty interesting considering they shot crystal clear footage of it in the 1930s lol. I'm always skeptical when people present incredibly distorted video as evidence. A lot of experts seem to think there is a good chance the Thylacine is still alive though.
I've seen a mother and 1 baby laying in the shade of a tree on the side of the road in Narrogin Western Australia I've also seen something that could have been one near Busselton Western Australia 1995 please leave this animal alone we lost it once so we thought let's not do it again
It's showing and running it's territory. Set up trail cams at the open areas. P.s. I've got a fox in my side yard. He had mange at one point, on the hind end. One, the proportions are off. The muzzle is too big and broad, foxes are more triangular and ummmmm like a triangle that was pinched, the tail is too long and robust, almost looks prehensile and more for balance, the foxes is just a bunch of thin bones wrapped in a plush bush or fur, and is used to convey mood, etc. The length and how it carries itself are off for a fox, the videos are very ungainly and foxes are very fluid. The legs of a fox are delicate, slender, and elegant, while the thylacine are stocky, thick boned and fairly muscular.
One Tasmanian tour operator has since reportedly added another U.S. $1.36 million to the prize pool. But the money is not just a click away. Entrants will have to submit digital photos of an unharmed tiger and later provide video footage as well as a certificate from a vet who has examined the animal.
Yes! People are seeing things! And these guys from the Thylacine awareness mob (whatever?) should be intelligent enough men to know that the majority of the sightings are foxes! And the rest (in the decade after 2000!) are ridiculously to blurred to be taken seriously. (Even your normal contemporary mobile phone could give better definition and stabilisation!) I want to believe it exists still, but I will not stoop to the fact I 'see what I want to see!'
Orkadian yes but foxes don't run and look like that and at least have hope that the Tasmanian tiger is alive hopefully just that I hope humans protect them not hunt them
Proportions? To me it looks really small next to the grass behind it. Compare the relative size of the ears with those of a thylacine... Its now absolutely definitive what it isn't. Note also the height of the ankle. Certainly nothing like a Thylacine. There is a group recently collecting blurry, distant images of mangy foxes and claiming they are thylacine, most footage being from well-populated areas in SA (zero road-kill or non-blurry images, oddly enough), they are well known to be hoaxing and strategically avoiding critiques of their claims (all their youtube footage is now 'comments disabled' because in every case they were utterly disproven by numerous people) and this is some of their footage.
Caelan Beyer You should have photographed them, or better yet made a cast (unreasonable demand, but this is a very important find). There are actually no remains of any sort, including footprints, directly proving that the thylacine still lives, so it would have been useful.
For a species to not die out and have a stable population, there needs to be over around 10,000 alive. The extinction was destined before the last one died, ever since they got under that number. I believe there were a couple alive within the next few years of the apparent last ones death, but it isn't possible to be alive today.
Not to mention thylacines didn't even live on the mainland, they went extinct from there 2000 years ago. If there were any sightings, they would be in Tasmania, not on the mainland.
10,000? And that is a scientific reasoned amount or just a made up figure? It's funny how people accuse people with sightings as making it up....and then quite happily make up their own BS to justify their own opinion. Hopefully you've also at least visited Australia including Tasmania and have a grasp on how vast it is.
I live in Australia and have visited Tasmania many times, and been to several museums and exhibitions based around Thylacines. From talking to several experts there, I heard from them that it is around 10,000+ for there to be a stable population. Not only that but there has been several searches with thousands of dollars put into them, and it took decades of no sightings from search teams for them to declare it extinct.
It makes me sick when some of those "animal rights" supporters say that we humans should all die out. One even commented that a tiger's daily food should be humans!
aspiknf Humans are too varied in nature to be labeled as such, just like in animals such as elephants or chimps that also have their own individuals that vary greatly in behavior. You could say that those animals are nothing but destructive in nature because of how individuals from those species act, despite the more docile members of their species acting in more altruistic ways.
Problem is feedstock, what do they eat? I mean in normal conditions, if there are sightings in urban dwellings makes sense as humans throws an awful lot of food, there are cats (and catfood) and little dogs they could prey on, do they go missing? The fact It has been declared extint does not mean It is. Best wishes from Spain
Slinkylabcat should see the brush tail possums at my place of a night There's a big female that bashes cats I'm not sure if they are bigger than yours but I'd estimate 6kg Or 13.5 lbs
If not extinct...l pray they keep running AWAY from humans.
Stay safe and free Thylocenes......
equarg yeah dude its sad humans are the reason they're gone
Yeah just imagine the moronic trophy hunters.
yeah, they dont deserve to be cooped up in cages just to be looked at and yelled at by little children, or to be hunted for their pelt. it is just rediculous
Boo hoo, those evil humans.
The humans that inhabited Tasmania were also hunted to extinction.
I saw a creature in jarrahdale on scarp road near the start close to the farm on one afternoon it ran like the feature in this video. Had stripes and a strange face that as it darted close to the bonnet of my car its head was tilted in our direction I distinctly remember it having rings on its black tail. Never seen it again this was almost 7 years ago at least but me and my friend never forget seeing it. Was almost as big as a large dog and has a cat like face and black ears.
Sabrinna Aken 😱
I choose to believe!
Thanks for sharing! Did you report your sighting to anyone?
Really and do u think it was a Tasmania tiger
I believe you.
Saw one in Barrington Tops NSW. We thought it was a quoll as we had no idea what it was or what a quoll looked like. I did some reasearch to discover other sightings in Barrington/Glouster area. My mind was blown. Everyone who sees these things becomes obsessed because youve encountered something mythical and now magical. Wonderful
They are extinct in Australia for like 3 thousand years or something like that xD
@@joaorebochooaw6321 yes thats what i thought as well. I obviously can't confirm it was a thylacine but you tell me what it was, a small panther looking animal with tiger stripes on the base of its back and start of tail
Damn I wish this was true. It'd be cool to see and amazing how sneaky they are if real. I'm just not naive or gullible
I still believe they are around.
i got one in a cage in my backyard
I would love for them to be still around but logically there is no possibility that they are I think what people are seeing are foxes and dingos suffering from Sarcoptic Mange.
If they are still around, maybe it's better we don't find them. After all we exterminated this animal as soon as we got here. Who's to say if we discovered this animal still alive, we wouldn't do it all over again?
William Carter same
They are....
The last one died in 1936 somehow that one was filmed with a better clearer camera than the ones filmed recently 🤔
Yup unfortunately it's prolly like bigfoot sightings a bunch of nonsense
Yes. Of course, they would be a little fuzzy and out of focus. Like all Big Foot sightings and others. They have to leave something to the imagination..
Yes, it is amazing that when you stand next to a small enclosure with a movie camera using
8 mm film on a tripod you get a better image than when you stick a small hobby camera or cell phone out of a window during a spontaneous sighting.
I just saw one on a video the exact animal.
Cause it was filmed in captivity at day time dumbass
0:40 whatever it is, its right front-leg is injured :-(
I didnt even notice
This is often a hunting tactic for animals. Fake an injury to draw in prey.
No they walk like that
No. Definitly injured. Animals don't fake injuries and that dam sure is not a natural gate.
Its a fox, its snout is far too short and its ears far too long to be a thylacine
The tlylacynes should sue Australian govt
Lol
Maw the Thylacine would also sue Australian Government to protect his kind :3
Только бы произошло чудо и тилацин ещё где-то сохранился.
why dont they set up trail cameras, they use them every where else with great results.
Joe Pasco agree with you
It's a very big area...
Yes. They use camera traps all over the world to track the movements of other endangered species like tigers and leopards. They should use them for this as well. Then we could have some really solid evidence.
That would be too easy. Like Loch Ness and Bigfoot and Aliens, they are too smart for camera traps. Only the nut jobs get to see them and record them on grainy 1912 cameras even though it's 2018 and everyone has a phone camera in their pockets now a days.
Trail cams have been used by different groups.
I've read that numerous tribal people in Irian Jaya (Indonesian New Guinea) have claimed to have seen them in their high valleys. I hope they are still living......and in several places in Australia, New Guinea, and Tasmania, of course. Beautiful animal.
50 million years of evolution, and humans hunted them to extinction in 50 years, we suck....
@@limpan3961 The problem is our species. On every continent the megafauna disappeared shortly after homo sapiens set foot on it for the first time. So yes, we suck :(
I liked to get sucked
@@domenigo97 You and Salem are both wrong.
We do cause many extinctions, but most of the time the issue is invasive species we bring.
Most of Australia is uninhabited by man today, in the past there were far less people, no way we hunted thylacine to extinction in Australia that's ridiculous.
The issue was ancient man brought canids. Dogs directly competed with thylacines, foxes directly competed with thylacine. Canids out competed the marsupials and there is a reason for this.
This happened 3 million years ago [before humans] when saber toothed tigers out competed a saber toothed marsupial called thylacosmilus in south America, other carnivorans out competed almost all terror birds. The difference was continental drift brought in invasive species, we brought canids to Australia.
Tasmania was a refuge because man did not bring canids to the island, there are no dingoes in Tasmania. They were endangered.
As for your assertion that we killed of the great megafauna, the Quaternary extinction is a mystery we do not know the cause.
We humans lived with woolly mammoths, woolly rhinos, snow hyenas cave lions etc for 400,000 years of our existence, older human species lived along side them for millions of years yet 12k years ago all of a sudden megafauna around the globe died, most humans died out as well.
All the while African rhinos and elephants, which have been around us from the beginning, are still alive!
People killed them because they were protected their sheep. And before even human hunted them down dogs and foxes compete with them which the main factor Tasmanian tiger couldn't keep up
By that time they were extinct or so we thought they extinct
I couldn't agree more....!
I saw a Thylacine in the Kingston SE area along the Coorong in the early 70's.
Steve Irwin would get to the bottom of this, I’ll bet. To bad he’s gone, but maybe his family will. 🤘
Those two kids are annoying...
RIP
big daddy 07 awwww, c’mon big daddeeeee 🤘
@@tonimoon6346 that was fucking cringe
Andrew Ucles makes him look silly
In the early 90's both my mother and I saw one outside of Deniliquin NSW and in the area 105 reported sightings had been made......
Jennifer Ramus did it have the stripes?
@ALAN BROWN If You would see something for few moments only would you have time to react and pull the camera? I don't think so.
@Rj Pogi 😭😭😭😂
This is such a huge country, who knows what secrets she still holds.
Yall niggas really came for his life like that. LMFAO
I hope they're alive and safe away from people. Looks like a unique and amazing animal.
I pray that they will stay away from humanity.
@@ph4rohhumuli
Or humanity will stay away from them.
Nelly G, love your name, yes they are cool looking.
We actually need to find at least 1 and start creating more to keep the species alive.
Me my mate seen a thylacine run across the road on McEnroe Road Tarpeena sa, out shooting one night, 2002. Its the only one I've seen in all my years out bush, it's Canter across the road was like nothing else..
I'll never forget That wildlife Encounter..
In my experience you often hear wildlife rather than see them. There are well attested ear witness accounts who can describe the call of the Thylacine. Surely if they are breeding near human habitation in Australia there ought to be strange vocalisations as well as sightings? Don't get me wrong, I would love it if they have survived somewhere in the Outback.
There are many witnesses who have heard them. There's also lots of foot prints that can only be a thylacine.
They’ve been extinct in Australia for some 3000 years or something. You can pretty much disregard every single claim of thylacine in Australia
I have seen one at a bush tip near lake eucumbene in NSW Australia about thirty years ago I was about 18 years of age not drunk not stoned.
Based on marsupial high reproduction rate, and it’s been 70-80 years since supposed extinction, if they’re still alive there’s been plenty of time to repopulate in high numbers, so there should be many more sightings if they’re around.
DylValentine problem is they have a poor captive reproduction rate and probably the same in the wild.
You know all about their reproductive cycles then? Or another claim without evidence.....works both ways sunshine.
@@daviddickinson936 You don't need to be a Ph.D to understand why Marsupials have a lower reproductive rate than placental mammals, there's only so much room inside a pouch for young coupled with most marsupials just breeding less frequently
A cat can have a litter of 6+ kittens every couple months, most marsupials probably only have a couple small litters a year if even that
Marsupials DO NOT have a high reproduction cycle LOL! Plus, Thylacines were very rare even before the white settlers started moving around Tasmania.
@@daviddickinson936 their reproductive cycle is documented and publicly available.
Do not know why, but missing you Tylacine from the other Side of the World.Hope you are still out there.
Robyn Nagorcka's video is of a fox with mange, with an injured foot.
The video from the 70's clearly shows a fox with mange as well. Slow down the video and you will see the last bits of fur still on its tail at the tip.
I took a road trip around Tasmania in 2009 and asked around. Some people I talked to swear they’ve seen it. I also came across something on a late night drive that I couldn’t identify, looked too small to be a thylacine though
If you look at 3:10, you will see that the back legs have a long midsection, and a short lower section. This matches with the good footage available for the creature. For me this is the most important characteristic. So, for me, it looks like the thylacine could still be alive! But my son says it is just a dog...
For sure not a short lower section of the leg. Also too short of a torso and legs too long. For sure not one.
Hopefully, they get to repopulate. I wouldn't mind find and shelter them in sanctuary area for their protection.
It is a little difficult when they are extinct...
We should try and back to the animals instead of raping them and this planet
@@kasioslo2629 Not extinct!
I do not think the reproduced well in captivity.
That's so not a fox, I have heard stories of sightings in 5 states, and seen paw prints that don't match foxes, dingo or feral dogs. I believe they are around just in very small numbers that roam.
Which 5 states are they? Just a few weeks ago, across the road from our front gate there was a wallaby with its head eaten off
@@artflyer8775 Vic,NSW, SA,ACT and QLD but I don't think QLD really fits.
@@brendanroberts4898 why not?
Hey Guys,
It’s okay, because an Australian university is (was secretly) studying and monitoring a large family of these animals at the top end of far North Queensland.
The local indigenous people have known they were there for a very long time.
The University has been tracking and monitoring them for about a year now.
Thank you.
Roger Cook Source, please.
How was that area effected by the fires?
@@TURK_182 I think it's too wet up there for bush fires, dunno,just guessing it's a lot different in the tropical parts of Australia not so dry,not so many bushfires
Yeah, I'd need I little more evidence, as they would be the first official mainland thylacines in two thousand years, according to science, so I'm slightly sceptical.
I’ll try to find the source of information.
Thanks 🙏🏽
Imagine if this species is intelligent enough to have realized the creatures that stand on two legs are to be avoided at all costs.
You mean kangaroos
Big brain
We can only hope it has and is still running around out in the bush.
Kangaroos do that lol
They eat kangaroo
I dreamed last night about a family of Thylacines sunning themselves in sand.They were very happy.
Redragonfly intriguing, how did they look?
Did they look like this?
Praise there name jah bless
@SAMSQUATCH Moss ur gay
Could you tell us more about this dream?
What have we humans done? I hope they are around and stay hidden.
what we always have done draining this planet dry
The tails and the bounding hair when it moves is consistent between the movies is nothing like any dog, fox or other member of the canine family.
Yet others see 2 of those clips as clearly fox, even to the white tip on the blurred tail that those who refuse to observe overlook. First one is a mangy fox with right front paw injured. Last one just a dog or fox. And those are clear records, yet their providers are probably convinced are something different. Common creatures, normal fauna, and not sadly tigers.
Ok, I used to live in SA, and one night my husband and I were driving past southern suburbs that are closer to the bush, and we saw something on the side of the road. I kept on driving, then looked at my husband and asked 'did you see it?' he said 'yes, I did'. It was like a slow action movie, I stopped the car, did u-turn to come back and check that thing again, but nothing was there. So, what we have seen looked like a large cat/leopard/tiger? with long tale, staying still on the side of the road, it was NOT a kangaroo or fox, ok? It was a large animal. Till this day I have no idea what we saw.
How long ago it happened?
@@aniruddhsingh4169 oh, that was may be 9 years ago
You sure it could be a dingo also dude
@@jayaprakashantherayil8895 I`m not a dude and you need to spend less time on the internet and untrustworthy websites, then you`ll be able to assess critically other people` intellectual abilities prior to asking irrelevant questions or making nonsense assumptions...
@V DO they are different colors and some don't have strips, depending on their environment to blend in for camo protection
Please God these people will be proved right one day
Pathetic religious nonsense grow up
Tom nobody cares about your ath ape crap. Im fine with it as long as you don’t insult other people. And force your beliefs
I thought thylacine was a prescription drug.
Yeah, like "FUKITOL"...😊
You need RX of Sucadic
It is
Whah the fuck.
Thalidomide?
~OBSESSED WITH THE THYLaCINES
they're magnificent animals. It would be amazing if they were still out there, somewhere. 👍
The males have pouches to protect their goodies - they can take it.
Thanks for that
This is very good too - ruclips.net/video/nmSTv-Gi7RU/видео.html
It’s a big country mate, and I’m sure they are out there.
Me and my mates either saw a ghost of one in the 90’s, sprinting flat out once when in the Western Australian country, won’t say where. But mate we all sat in silence until one of us asked if the other boys saw it , and then we described what we each thought we saw and and concluded eventually what we all saw and all agreed. Stripe and hopping back legs. Like a gallop.
If they are still alive, Just leave them alone until they have a higher enough population where there would be more sightings and eventually officially say they are not dead
Depending on the health of the populations, they would still need to be conserved.
I see those quite often in the bush behind the farm.grandfather said don't tell anyone.been seeing them since the 70's.
Yet you just did with no proof back it up
I'm not convinced but I'm also not counting out the possibility that Thylacines could still be out there. But my questions is simple: We have fantastic tech these days called trail cams which can be strapped to a tree and photograph anything that triggers it with movement. Why is nobody using them? Or are they, and they just aren't seeing any thylacines?
I'm guessing they are using trail cams, but just like with God, you can't prove a negative. It can always be argued that they simply haven't been filmed by these cameras "yet".
Active--You most certainly can prove a "positive." Right now, scientists, most of them, rule out the possibility of a living, breeding colony of Thylacines. All it will take is one crisp, clear video of one of them, or a body, and we will all be on board for the protection of this species. But it has been many decades since the last one (known) died in captivity in the 30's. Don't get me wrong--I hope Thylacines are still here--but there is no real evidence.
You might have misunderstood what I was trying to convey. I agree with you that they are probably extinct. But a lack of decent video footage will not convince those who desperately want to believe they are still alive.
I agree
The problem with game cameras is to cover a *very large area* you you need an *unbelievably large number of game cams,* and *somebody* has to *pay for them.* Plus you have to know *where* to put the cams in the first place.
You ALSO have to have dedicated teams to service these cameras in review all the footage caught on them.
The money and resources needed to do all that would never be available until it was proven the thylacines still existed, and then you wouldn't need the game cams anyway....
They've been sighted in dense bushland in the Blue Mountains of NSW. There are populations on Tasmania AND the mainland. They'll be fine if we just leave them alone. They aren't scared of us, but they should be!
4 years later and the work of Neil Waters has thoroughly convinced me that the thylacine is indeed extinct.
Like credibility
With the phone interviews, all of his print casts, as well as other people's casts, makes the photos and videos even more substantial. The government should step up and be willing to put a little money behind proving they still exist, because it will be proven, and the government is going to come out of it looking like they were trying to pull a cover-up. Which all governments will try to do with many different things that they don't want the general public to know about.
@A Florida Son 🤣 The idea of Neil's photo and video evidence being "substantial" is truly hilarious!!
The way he gets so excited about things that are SO obviously not thylacines is what's got me so convinced that they're extinct, at least outside of New Guinea.
@@AFloridaSon None of the information provided is even slightly convincing. No great conspiracy exists except on the mind of the gullible or misled. The fact fools or ignorant exist among so-called professionals shows problems with education and general knowledge, not that somehow thylacines have hatched on the mainland Australia. They can't even identify foxes and cats. The soliciting of funds from the gullible to pursue this outright falsehood is abhorrent.
The funding of reliable research in Tasmania might have merit, and these con-men and fantasisers are not reliable researchers.
@@stephenbrand5661 And people donate funds to keep these spreaders of untruths in beer and toys. The most useful donation would be a childs book with pictures of dogs and foxes and cats.
There have been quite a few sightings in the Southwest of Western Australia. I used to live down there and saw one myself I am sure when out in the bush on motorcycles.
I love them. I wish I had one living in me backyahd
Let's hope so, would, be an incredible recovery!
What pathetic and horrible creatures are humans. When they were around, they hunted these magnificent things down to extinction. Now they are desperate for a glimpse.
Honestly that's every living carnivore/omnivore in a nutshell
i use to hunt them in my younger day im 103 years old now i killed about 30
Ok we get that humans are terrible stfu
@@williamcarter6563 damn you despicable killer. You're one of those to blame for this ecological tragedy.
Man, i'm such a terrible person because animals who slaughtered farm animals were hunted by some old biddies who are probably dead of old age in AUSTRALIA
I really do hope they are still out there. We really need a live one to be caught and held. Grainy videos are just not enough.
In France, we have an old legend about a "beast" in the Gévaudan region, which was described as something between a wolf, a lion and a hyena. It is largely accepted today that the beast was a hyena, or maybe a thylcacine, who broke free from the local fair (historians found out that in the region there was a well-known "curiosity zoo" which sold exotic animals).
That thing apparently killed a lot of people. So slightly possible a hyaena (a few have been man killers), but wolf or lion have much more credibility. Thylacine? They killed chickens, not humans.
I read that story, and could say categorically that a thylacine would not have killed so many people, and there is no record in Australia or them killing people not even children. I recall that the animal description in France turned out to be closer to that of a Lion rather than a Hyena, and could also have escaped from a fair to I suppose.
I remember reading about this when I was learning French.
I hope they are not extinct cause I remember reading about them as a kid and was sad to read that they were killed off
And they don't know it Thylacines/Tasmanian Tigers were actually extinct or not.
I am fascinated by thylacenes and so 2want them to still be with us
un the blue mountains I saw a thylacine
eating a carcasse of horse
Man, I really wish these incredible beats are still around. Somewhere.
I hope they can be saved!
I live on my mi mi road and i see them
@@grumpygristo3234 PLEASE try and get some footage! 🙏🙏
I sure hope they're still out there. Aren't they somewhat solitude animals?
The males have pouches to protect their goodies - they can take it.
Thanks for that
This is very good too - ruclips.net/video/nmSTv-Gi7RU/видео.html
What sucks is that the more people say that they saw it, the more people are going to look for it. Let the wild be wild
I saw that exact creature just coming out of kersbrook in the adelaide hill didn't have enough time to film I really beleive Tasmanian tigers are still alive
2019 anyone
stfu idc what year it is
Nah bro 2020
The animal in the video around 2:50 totally looks like a fox suffering from mange. The head looks too big because the hair loss makes the body look smaller than with all the usual fluffiness people are used to. The thylacine has fat tail base/long butt. The tail of the mangy fox in the video is slim at its base. It also runs weirdly because one of its front legs is injured.
Look up pictures of hairless cats, guinea pigs, hamsters... all of them seem to have weird proportions but it´s because of the absence of fur, not because their proportions are different from the hairy ones.
Just a matter of time to finally see the wonderful animals for sure.
I still can't believe not a s8ngle person said you know maybe we should keep a few of these things alive in captivity
Well they did mate, but they don't breed well in captivity and eventually the last one died in 1936.
yortko1 because someone forgot to feed the tiger... Humans
They did but breeding attempts failed.
What's sad is us humans hunted them to extinction.Captivity is no place for a wild animal.As the wild Kratts say."Living free and in the wild"
A fake
Like a lot of things hoped to be around--bigfoot, angels, saucermen--no one has produced any proof. I'm rooting that they find some one day but I'm not holding my breath until that day comes.
Jim Pauff I'm normally a skeptic about things like bigfoot, ufos etc as the so called evidence is usually bullshit or ridiculous CGI effects. This case however seems plausible due to the video footage plus the animal did definitely exist at one time.
@@MichaelWilliams-mo1vv I'd agree with you if the quality of the videos was higher. What I see could be mangy dogs or foxes. I'm rooting for the tiger being around but you have to convince me. It seems to me that the rational thing.
Neil Waters...the guy who announced to the world he'd gotten a tiger on a trail cam.
It's a padmelon.
Australia is a continent with 24 mil people on it most of them living in the city's so even if they find alive dinosaurs in Australia it wouldn't be far-fetched.
Dinosaurs were only hypothesised
It would be amazing to know they are still out there.
I love animals from the old times.
They looks so cute
I hope! they still are around.
I believe aus is so vast and I believe megalania is still around too
Us human beings are garbage sometimes the dog should have been in the cage it should have been roaming free forgive us mother nature for what we have done
0:48 , 3:04 04:15 video is indeed a real thylacine.
The anatomy matches exactly that of a real thylacine. The heel so close to the ground, the pointy tail. During every jump when it's hind legs are in the air you can even see the stripes for the fraction of a second. It's definitely one.
But all other vids are definitely just ordinary foxes. Just look at the heels on their legs. They are way to high to be a thylacine and the tail doesn't match that of a thylacine.
Is looks exactly how a 🦊 would look like.
But on the 0:48 3:04 4:15 vid, that looks exactly how a thylacine would look like if you compare the body anatomy of the video, the stripes and the tail to the real Thylacine fossiles, bones, pictures and videos that are left in universities and on the internet from real thylacines.
So it's a genuine thylacine on that old video. But that doesn't mean ist still out there today. It just means at the time the old video was shot they were still out there. They could have still died out since then unfortunately.
Especially if their population numbers have become to small to stop inbreeding and keep a self sustaining population.
It's very unlikely the last one in captivity was the last one alive... But a tiny remaining population would be inbred and vulnerable. The sightings in the 70s could easily be real... but the numbers would have expanded by now if the species was still going...
Could be in PNG
MrEd or maybe they were alive but because of lack of numbers and food source they died off soon after
there's probably 100 or 2 left big properties out there you got a thousand in one chance of seeing one just let them be free
Just like all the Bigfoot videos you can't see a clear decent video or image.
Yes, that makes me doubtfull about these sightings. There's always enough image quality to support the possibility of whatever is shown being the mysterious creature, but not enough to confirm it.
But unlike Bigfoot these things we know up until recently existed
Paul O'Toole
Yeah, pretty interesting considering they shot crystal clear footage of it in the 1930s lol. I'm always skeptical when people present incredibly distorted video as evidence. A lot of experts seem to think there is a good chance the Thylacine is still alive though.
Yes you can. The Patterson Bigfoot video is clear as day.
We seen one in the onkaparinga gorge
its plausible theirs still a small number of them left.ya never know mother nature has her ways of beating the odds stacked against her.(mankind)
True..👍
Is there not a Thylacine corps/fossil in the narracort caves?
You should have kept it a secret. Now careless, narcissits will try to kill it.
they just needed to eat and take care of their pups like all of nature
im glad the thylacine is still alive, from now on the thylacine is my fav animal amd hopefully they r lots of them around the world too :D
I doubt he is out there on other continents
I've seen a mother and 1 baby laying in the shade of a tree on the side of the road in Narrogin Western Australia I've also seen something that could have been one near Busselton Western Australia 1995 please leave this animal alone we lost it once so we thought let's not do it again
Geez, I hope they still exist
Myah Weeks stfu you muppet
@@alycestapleton Hostile much?
It's showing and running it's territory. Set up trail cams at the open areas. P.s. I've got a fox in my side yard. He had mange at one point, on the hind end. One, the proportions are off. The muzzle is too big and broad, foxes are more triangular and ummmmm like a triangle that was pinched, the tail is too long and robust, almost looks prehensile and more for balance, the foxes is just a bunch of thin bones wrapped in a plush bush or fur, and is used to convey mood, etc. The length and how it carries itself are off for a fox, the videos are very ungainly and foxes are very fluid. The legs of a fox are delicate, slender, and elegant, while the thylacine are stocky, thick boned and fairly muscular.
i hope they never see one... that way, people wont hunt them again
Scrolled down to the comments with the same thought
I hope Tasmania and Australia will take the proper measure too protect the Thylacine
I got two of them as a pet right now
One Tasmanian tour operator has since reportedly added another U.S. $1.36 million to the prize pool. But the money is not just a click away. Entrants will have to submit digital photos of an unharmed tiger and later provide video footage as well as a certificate from a vet who has examined the animal.
Yes! People are seeing things! And these guys from the Thylacine awareness mob (whatever?) should be intelligent enough men to know that the majority of the sightings are foxes! And the rest (in the decade after 2000!) are ridiculously to blurred to be taken seriously. (Even your normal contemporary mobile phone could give better definition and stabilisation!) I want to believe it exists still, but I will not stoop to the fact I 'see what I want to see!'
Orkadian yes but foxes don't run and look like that and at least have hope that the Tasmanian tiger is alive hopefully just that I hope humans protect them not hunt them
samantha Wilson Fuck human.
Orkadian does not look at all like a fox
LAIONE MEIHE TAHI KOULA KANATEA. Well your rude
foxes have big floofy tails
Look as if it's right front paw is sore @ 2:20
hi
Does no one in Australia have a trail cam?
I hope they can breed this kind of animal in the future 😭
You're crazy that animal didn't even exist. Theres no evidence of any animal gone to the extinction it is simply impossible
Honestly, these are my fav animal, if i had a pet one i would treat it like god!
only thing i see on them bad videos is foxes with skin deseases
Proportions? To me it looks really small next to the grass behind it. Compare the relative size of the ears with those of a thylacine... Its now absolutely definitive what it isn't. Note also the height of the ankle. Certainly nothing like a Thylacine. There is a group recently collecting blurry, distant images of mangy foxes and claiming they are thylacine, most footage being from well-populated areas in SA (zero road-kill or non-blurry images, oddly enough), they are well known to be hoaxing and strategically avoiding critiques of their claims (all their youtube footage is now 'comments disabled' because in every case they were utterly disproven by numerous people) and this is some of their footage.
@Virat Khanna. keep on dreaming , wanna see a tylacine - clone one.
@@tonyjewell2639 yea right.100% agree.
2hen i went to Tasmania i saw some foot prints in the sand which exactly reassembled a Tasmanian tigers foot print.
Caelan Beyer You should have photographed them, or better yet made a cast (unreasonable demand, but this is a very important find). There are actually no remains of any sort, including footprints, directly proving that the thylacine still lives, so it would have been useful.
For a species to not die out and have a stable population, there needs to be over around 10,000 alive. The extinction was destined before the last one died, ever since they got under that number. I believe there were a couple alive within the next few years of the apparent last ones death, but it isn't possible to be alive today.
Not to mention thylacines didn't even live on the mainland, they went extinct from there 2000 years ago. If there were any sightings, they would be in Tasmania, not on the mainland.
10,000? And that is a scientific reasoned amount or just a made up figure? It's funny how people accuse people with sightings as making it up....and then quite happily make up their own BS to justify their own opinion. Hopefully you've also at least visited Australia including Tasmania and have a grasp on how vast it is.
I live in Australia and have visited Tasmania many times, and been to several museums and exhibitions based around Thylacines. From talking to several experts there, I heard from them that it is around 10,000+ for there to be a stable population. Not only that but there has been several searches with thousands of dollars put into them, and it took decades of no sightings from search teams for them to declare it extinct.
Never say never....never!
Would love to know who these "experts" were.
Ive seen 2 on the mainland near Daylesford
Too many government conspiracy theorists and people trying to convince themselves our entire race is horrible in these comments. So cancerous.
It makes me sick when some of those "animal rights" supporters say that we humans should all die out. One even commented that a tiger's daily food should be humans!
Humans are despicable. Whether that fact upsets you doesn't change the truth.
aspiknf Humans are too varied in nature to be labeled as such, just like in animals such as elephants or chimps that also have their own individuals that vary greatly in behavior. You could say that those animals are nothing but destructive in nature because of how individuals from those species act, despite the more docile members of their species acting in more altruistic ways.
Problem is feedstock, what do they eat? I mean in normal conditions, if there are sightings in urban dwellings makes sense as humans throws an awful lot of food, there are cats (and catfood) and little dogs they could prey on, do they go missing? The fact It has been declared extint does not mean It is. Best wishes from Spain
Nah those things r gone, n fuk that sucks
Slinkylabcat should see the brush tail possums at my place of a night
There's a big female that bashes cats
I'm not sure if they are bigger than yours but I'd estimate 6kg
Or
13.5 lbs
@@kanGaBanGaZ that’s not a Tasmanian Tiger they weigh 35kg
How did the last Thylacine in the zoo died sickness?Did they decide to kill it or others?