The Muslim Cowboy's Horrible Arguments!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
- David Wood and I take a look at some of the recent videos the Muslim Cowboy has put out, including some of his attempts to address arguments we have made.
David's channel: / @apologeticsroadshow
Rob's channel: / @sentinelapologetics
Update on the Yusuf Estes connection. I found an old video on Facebook from 2020 where Yusuf says they are distant relatives. So they are not father and son.
When you're talking to _followers_ _of_ _paul_ ...
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
Q: Is Jesus the son of Mary?
A: Yes,
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus was born from the mother he created (Mary)
Q: Is Jesus a born son?
A: Yes,
Q: Who is his father?
A: God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus is the father of God Jesus and the creator of the mother he was born from her the son of his wife
Q: Is Jesus the servant of God?
A: Yes,
Q: Did Jesus die on the cross?
A: Yes,
Q: And for whom did he go up?
A: To God
*God Jesus was crucified & ascended to God Jesus
Q: Is Jesus a Messenger?
A: Yes,
Q: Who sent him?
A: God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus was the messenger of God Jesus. God sends himself as a Messenger of himself
Q: Did Jesus pray when he was alive?
A: yes,
Q: Whom was he praying for?
A: For God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus worships God Jesus himself
Q: Does God have a beginning?
A: No
Q: So who was born on December 25th?
A: Jesus
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus is eternal before everything but he was born in 25th Dec
Q: Where is God?
A: In heaven
Q: How many Gods are there in heaven?
A: God is only one.
Q: Where is Jesus sitting?
A: He is sitting on the right of God.
Q: Is Jesus a God?
A: Yes
Q: So how many Gods are there in heaven?
A: Only one God
Q: Where is Jesus?
A: He is sitting to the right of God.
Q: So how many gods are there in heaven?
A: Only one god. Still
Q: Is Jesus a God?
A: Yes
Q: So who many seated gods are there?
A: Only one God?
Q: Where is Jesus?
A: He is sitting next to the god.
Q: How many gods are in heaven?
A: Only one.
Q: Are they sitting on the same chair?
A: These words are understood only by the one who has the holy spirit.
*so.. God sacrificed God to God in order to save God's creation from God. God prayed to God for help but God didn't help God, and God killed God with help from humans. And that God is a father of himself and the mother of himself and the son of mother he created at the same time. He is also eternal but his birthday is...? 🤡
You have no spiritual understanding! It is sad.@Durray13
It’s funny how a basic understanding of trinitarianism completely explains every supposed conflict you brought up.
@@NScottAuthor i dont see how its so hard for people to understand the trinity it is a very simple concept in my eyes
@@NScottAuthorWhat is basic understanding of trintrniasm??? Jesus is son of God not human..But he needs to eat food to live..What kind of God is this??
No one has ever seen Joseph Smith and Mohammed together in the same room.
No I have when I was recieving revelation from them that said I should take multiple wifes
It is proof you see!
satan has
@@RedKingJ23 LOL.
Has he? Has he?
Or has anyone ever seen any two of them together in one place?
They both together in hell
Islam rhymes with scam. It's a poetic miracle! Alhamdullilah!
Lol, I love this 😂😂😂😂
Yeah, but it doesn't rhyme with scam.
Their ending syllables sound completely different.
It doesn't rhyme with scam, but it does rhyme with bomb. Also fitting.
@@NontpNonjo BROOO 💀
@@NontpNonjo It doesn't rhyme with bomb, what are you talking about?
Without lies, Islam dies
@@AlonzoHarris235 keep copying Christians word like your prophet used to steal verses from bible😂😂
@@AlonzoHarris235 keep copying Christians word like your prophet used to st£@l verses from bible😂😂
@@AlonzoHarris235 Christianity isn't dying anytime soon, and I'm sure we don't have lies
@@AlonzoHarris235ah poor baby your always wrong!!!
@@davidjanbaz7728 how is he wrong Islam is the fastest breeding religion
Jibril wore "I am Satan" shirt when he met Muhammad but Muhammad cant tell because he cant read
Just like the Muhammad's Boom Boom Room skit.
OMG 😂😂😂😂
💀💀💀
so Jibril wore a shirt 🤣🤣🤣WHAT NEXT
*What the islamic sources tell us about the early preservation of the Quran:*
*Many verses and even whole suras of the Quran have been lost forever, especially during the battle of yamama* (Ibn Abi Dawud, Kitab al-Masahif p. 23). *Others were simply forgotten* (Muslim 1050) *and the early muslims had huge differences between their recitations, so that they feared a splitting between the muslims* (Bukhari 4987). *Thats why they decided, to choose one version of what was left from the Quran and to write it down into one book* (Bukhari 4679).
*So they took what was left from the Quran from stones, leaves, bones, animal-skins and the memories of different muslims* (Bukhari 4679). *Some verses were only found by particular people and no one else remembered them* (Bukhari 4679; 4986), *about other verses it gave disputes* (Bukhari 4944; Jami at Tirmidhi 3104) *and others were left out and not put in the Quran, while even the "master of the Quran", Ubay ibn Ka'b said, that they were part of it* (Bukhari 5005), *or Umar* (Abi Dawud 4418), *or Aisha* (Muslim 1452). *And some of these verses were supposedly eaten by a goat* (Ibn Majah 1944).
*Ubay ibn Ka'b was one of the four recitators, from which the muslims should learn the Quran, according to Mohammed* (Bukhari 3808; 4999).
*The recitation of Ubay ibn Ka'b had 116 suras, and the suras and the verses had a different order than the versions of the Quran of today* (Ibn al-Nadim, Kitab al-Fihrist p. 45). *And they had also differences in the text. For example had the verse 33,6 in Ubay's version the addition "and he is the father of them", as we can read in a the footnote of Yousef Ali in his english translation of the Quran.*
*The first one on Mohammed's list of the four recitators from whom the muslims should learn the Quran was ibn Masud* (Bukhari 3808; 4999). *His recitation only had 111 suras and also in his version, the verses and suras had a different order* (Ibn al-Nadim, Kitab al-Fihrist p. 45). *And he had also differences in the text of his recitation. For example did he and Abu Darda recite Sura 92,3 this way* (Bukhari 4944):
وَالذَّكَرِ وَالأُنْثَى
"By the male and the female"
*But in the Quran today we read:*
وَمَا خَلَقَ الذَّكَرَ وَالأُنْثَى
"By him who created the male and the female"
*Ibn Masud, the first one on Mohammeds list of the four people, from whom the muslims should learn the Quran, disliked the Quran of Uthman so much, that he did not accept it* (Jami at Tirmidhi 3104).
*You know, Uthman. The guy who decided to burn the original-manuscripts (fragments)* (Bukhari 4987) *and to destroy the 7 ahruf, from which Mohammed said they were revelations from Allah*
Danke de Herr
🔥
When you're talking to _followers_ _of_ _paul_ ...
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
Q: Is Jesus the son of Mary?
A: Yes,
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus was born from the mother he created (Mary)
Q: Is Jesus a born son?
A: Yes,
Q: Who is his father?
A: God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus is the father of God Jesus and the creator of the mother he was born from her the son of his wife
Q: Is Jesus the servant of God?
A: Yes,
Q: Did Jesus die on the cross?
A: Yes,
Q: And for whom did he go up?
A: To God
*God Jesus was crucified & ascended to God Jesus
Q: Is Jesus a Messenger?
A: Yes,
Q: Who sent him?
A: God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus was the messenger of God Jesus. God sends himself as a Messenger of himself
Q: Did Jesus pray when he was alive?
A: yes,
Q: Whom was he praying for?
A: For God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus worships God Jesus himself
Q: Does God have a beginning?
A: No
Q: So who was born on December 25th?
A: Jesus
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus is eternal before everything but he was born in 25th Dec
Q: Where is God?
A: In heaven
Q: How many Gods are there in heaven?
A: God is only one.
Q: Where is Jesus sitting?
A: He is sitting on the right of God.
Q: Is Jesus a God?
A: Yes
Q: So how many Gods are there in heaven?
A: Only one God
Q: Where is Jesus?
A: He is sitting to the right of God.
Q: So how many gods are there in heaven?
A: Only one god. Still
Q: Is Jesus a God?
A: Yes
Q: So who many seated gods are there?
A: Only one God?
Q: Where is Jesus?
A: He is sitting next to the god.
Q: How many gods are in heaven?
A: Only one.
Q: Are they sitting on the same chair?
A: These words are understood only by the one who has the holy spirit.
*so.. God sacrificed God to God in order to save God's creation from God. God prayed to God for help but God didn't help God, and God killed God with help from humans. And that God is a father of himself and the mother of himself and the son of mother he created at the same time. He is also eternal but his birthday is...? 🤡
@@Durray13 Tell me you don't understand christianity without telling me.
For one Paul met Jesus in a vision while persecuting christians and confirmed his revelation with the disciples that had lived with Jesus and then he became converted and babtized. He was a Jewish scolar and Pharizee. Went from a prosecuter to one of the greatest Apostels.
Mohammed was only on his own, was not a Jew, was no scolar bc he was illiterate, he never met Isa, thaught he was posessed, had no witnesses only listeners and everything he preached was mosltly in his own favor e.g. his sexual and military desires. And he was a phedophile.
And the most important one; Allah told Muhammed that if he doubted, he had to confirm his revelations with the people of the Book, a.k.a christians. We already had the full compiled Bible for over 300 years by then.
If you guys start using the same type of arguments you use against christians for your own religion, there will be little left.
Jesus is God the father in human form, how is it so hard to believe that: if God wanted to relate and save his creation he knew that only He could do it, humans are finite and fallen but God the father is infinite and perfect so he humbled himself to become human, it would be like creating a simulation of a world, you are all powerful in manipulating the environment, people, structures ect. You are the “god” of this computer simulation, you then put your consciousness into a npc but you still have access to the code so you can still manipulate the world in anyway you like. This is still you but in a sense also not completely you, since this computer you embodies “computer form” but it’s still your consciousness it’s still you.
As for Jesus crying out on the cross and asking this cup to pass from him in the garden--
He is completely God in all sense he just inhabits a human body (He is God so of course he is not bound to how we would see things, meaning he doesn’t need to leave heaven to become human , I tend to think of it as splitting yourself but He isn’t bound by physics like we are so when he “divided himself” there wasn’t anything lost it’s dividing without actually loosing something in both parts) since he is completely human he got the complete human experience (as was his goal) so he was overwhelmed by human emotion, it’s a beautiful thing that even God can understand absolute temptation and absolute pain and suffering, so when we call out to him, he knows he understand he experienced the struggle of being human but he overcame sin and death and paid for our sins with his own blood, fulfilling a age old prophesy and allowing all access to the father through the son Jesus Christ. Jesus crying out shows us that Jesus wasn’t just robotic, he had thoughts and feelings and was influenced by emotion and pain. He was scared as anyone who knew they were about to experience the most painful death known to man. Jesus knew what had to be done and showed us that no matter the fear we can trust in the Fathers plan. Now when he was specifically on the cross and he said father father why have you forsaken me? He said that because on the cross he was carrying the weight of all human sin throughout all of history, past present and future, he carried so much sin that God the father could not look at him, he could not be where absolute sin is. So when God turns from Jesus- or more like turns from the weight of ALL HUMAN SIN-- Jesus feels his presence depart from him, now Jesus had never felt separation from the Father even before the earth was Jesus was with the father so this separation would feel infinitely worse than being stripped away from your wife for example.
The Holy Spirit:
The Holy Spirit is a gift to humanity after the death and resurrection of Jesus, it is God in spirit form that is given to you through the grace of God, it allows God to have a seat in your heart, to guide you, comfort you and love you. It is a direct connection we can have with God on Earth. Jesus walked on Earth- so God walked on earth, he didn’t want to leave us completely in the time inbetween his first and second coming so his gifted us with God in spirit form that is here to comfort us, he is called the great comforter in the Bible.
As for ruling in heaven,
We can’t know and it’s very ignorant to think of heaven as a purely physical place or the thrown of god to be entirely physical, there is a thrown room where God commands his holy host but we have no reason to believe that there would be a physical problem with there being one seat and three parts of the same whole that couldn’t sit in it. It’s naive and honestly rather dumb to argue that earthly physics would be directly enforced upon God. We see God manipulate physics in all sorts of ways, it’s disingenuous to argue that he would now be bond by earthly laws, especially when it comes to universal physics.
Jesus is at the right hand of the father:
Just like we are not actually wed to Christ and it is a metaphors to show our relationship with Christ and his relationship with the church, no one actually believes that there will be any sexual relationship between Jesus and the church, so too do we look at the relationship when Jesus says that he sits at the right hand of God. He is saying that he wields the power of God and has authority over Earth.
Your whole argument was one giant straw man from someone who is either wildly ignorant or malevolent. Either you have just peripherally heard about the trinity and have done no theological research or you are intentionally infantilizing the doctrine of Christianity.
I KNEW Rob would open Psalm 82 in arabic! 😂😂😂
THE BIBLE: The Bible was originally written in three different languages (Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic), on three different continents (Europe, Asia, and Africa), in a time-spend of over 1500 years, by over forty different authors among whom were kings, peasants, philosophers, fishermen, poets, statesmen, scholars, a herdsman, a general, a cupbearer, a doctor, a tax collector, and a rabbi. Without contradicting one another, each author wrote on the common theme of God’s enduring love for mankind, and God’s redeeming plan of salvation through His Son - Jesus Christ.
*
Unlike the Quran written in a period of about 23 years in Mohammed’s native tongue (the Quraishi tribal dialect and then translated into the Arabic language), the forty plus different authors of the Bible were moved by the Spirit of God to write down truths about God in their own ways of thinking, in their own ways of understanding, and in their own ways of reasoning in what is truth. Each author also wrote down the truths of God in his own style of compositions - be it essay, music, or poetry.
*
Critics of the Bible claimed the Bible contains contradictions. How? - Because two different authors living hundreds and hundreds of years apart on two different continents, and whose writing styles (essay, music, or poetry) in two different languages did not use the same word or phrase to describe the same event. How ridiculous the claim!
*
We must also consider the Bible was not originally written on computer software (Microsoft Disk, iPad, or CD Rom), but rather the Bible was written on papyrus - a wet land plant-based substance (materials) that would rot and decay; thus, making transcribers (copyists, clerks) to primitively re-write the Bible by hands unto new papyrus decades, after decades, after decades for centuries, after centuries, after centuries… What monumental feet in all of human existence - What an enormous human ingenuity of preservation!
I think they are generally pointing out discrepancies. For example in the OT there are many examples of dates not making sense or who does what. Prime example was how long were the Hebrews in bondage? Then you have lenient laws vs strict laws of the same problems. I know we have enough traditions and discussions that can solve this but on it's face as a collection of stories there are some contradicitons. I still say so what. Doesn't take away from the stories and message.
@@RunesandReapers Thank you for your respond to my comment. It made me to edit by adding one more paragraph to my comment. Though it does not address the problems you pointed out, it may soften the thoughts about them.
Another thing about the Bible compared to the Qur'an is that Muslims claim that the Qur'an has been perfectly transmitted, but Christians don't say the same about the Bible. The Muslims say that the words of Allah can never be corrupted, no matter what. However, there are dozens of textual variants of the Qur'an, many of which are substantially different from what might be considered the "authoritative" version. The very existence of these variants disproves one of Islam's central claims, casting the veracity of the entire religion into serious doubt.
Meanwhile, no Christian that I know of thinks the Bible we have today is a perfect replica of what was originally written. Instead, we have textual criticism, which shows that, taking into account all of the different manuscripts, the Old Testament we read today is 95% accurate to the original, and the New Testament is around 98% accurate to the original. This is as close to perfect transmission of an ancient document over thousands of years as I think we'll ever get.
This is yet another reason why I consider the claims of Islam to be not only false, but ridiculous as well. I appreciate your comment; you put the story of the Bible very elegantly and showed how the Qur'an falls short.
At the end of the day it's still not a standard for truth or accuracy. The Quran, just as the bible, is supposed to be the absolute truth for all humanity yet only concernes itself with arab tribal wars, written from the perspective of desert cultures in the mediterranean. It takes multiple stories from the bible and reinterprets them, and has Muhammad being the only human being able to give testimony for allah since allah "only speaks to him" and no one else (except his child wife aysha one time). It doesn't count plants as living beings, it describes a geocentric cosmos accurate to the beliefs of that time, it describes the sun setting in a puddle of water where alexander the great was supposedly even able to track it. It treats child marriage as perfectly normal and even endorses if by having muhammad take part in it.. just as some tribes back then did. It describes a "benevolent god" who acts just as human and political as most imagined gods before allah. and so on and so on.
It is different from the bible in that it was written in a shorter time, but speaking of conservation of text, the whole of the quran got lost and was then rewritten by muslim scholars in high positions (of course) who apparently memorized the whole text perfectly. At the end of the day it's one text to be believed versus another. If you believe it, good for you. But christians and muslims, don't squabble about supposed "accuracy flaws" of your holy texts. None of them are perfect. Accept each others beliefs and don't judge other people based on it. We're living in different times now, and if we'd still strictly adhere to the rules of our religions we would be nothing but barbarians.
How can the Quran can be perfectly preserved when a goat ate the half of it? 😂
Islam definitely needs logic. Alas, it has NONE. That is one of its numerous flaws. Can't believe how ludicrous the Cowboy's "arguments" were. SMH.
My understanding of the "Royal we" it that it is the monarch appealing to his/her divine right to rule and declaring that they are only answerable to "God" , so in Islam that would be "Allah" answering only to "Allah" with kind of destroys their idea of perfect monotheism.
And it wasn’t used until between 13th and 14th century. English monarchy being head of Church of England so speaking on behalf of them both.
Playing Lutheran Satire's video in the middle of a livestream is based.
I think a Calvinist satire video would be even more based.
@@Reformed_Borzoi They were predestined to pull up the video.
@@NickNui
You were predestined to say that
Christ is lord
That may upset these fake Christians.
Woah buddy they just decided that was antisemitic.
This is sarcasm incase someone doesn't understand
When a Royal says we they mean the Royal Court as they speak on behalf.
Some people call him the Muslim Cowboy! Some people call him the defender of Muhammad’s “love” ! Well some people call him the reader of Hadiths! Because he speaks on the pompotous of frauds!
"It should be pointed out that in pre-Islamic literature, and during the time of
the revelation of the Qur'an, pronouns do not appear to have been used as
indicative of status; they did not change with social status, AND THE PLURAL OF MAJESTY, IN PARTICULAR, DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN USED BY, OR FOR ADDRESING OR REFERRING TO, KINGS OF CHIEFS. The Prophet and his early successors did not use
it for themselves nor in their letters to address kings or governors.34 It was
clearly in the Qur'an that such usage was introduced, as has been shown, on the
basis of a highly sophisticated application of the concept of plurality. " Abdel Haleem M.A.S. Grammatical Shift for rhetorical purposes: Iltifat and related features in the Quran. Emphasis mine
I tried to debate this with some of the moslem debatters in youtube and they deny it stone hard that their tawheed is literally meant as it is written
Momo diddled goats, prove me wrong 😆
Those goats that ate some of the Quran (according to Aisha) were really his friends deleting his browser history.
Christians diddle goats everyday in the USA. There called Amish
🐐
I believe that when one engages with Islam and Christianity in search of answers, one should focus less on individual details and instead undertake a comprehensive examination of their teachings and contents to gain an understanding of their inner essence. It becomes clear that they are completely opposite, even back to front images. Even if one considers variants, translations, or missing passages, focusing on details risks losing sight of the whole and does not change the existing fundamental differences. The struggle between the two faiths revolves around the concept of the respectively vision of humanity, or rather view of the human being.The question should be answered when considering both faiths: if these teachings are so different, which spirit is behind them, comes from "God" or his adversary? Which of the two makes people more freer, creative, human or more loving? What is ultimately the TRUTH.
That's a very true point. Validity can be in Details and also in the Broad perspective. Both of these approaches reveal truth. In fact if the details do not match the panorama, then such an inconsistency points to something invalid!
So AlonzoHarris is simply arguing against basic logic, which he decries as 'western modernism' in order to excuse your valid point! This is the kind of illogical excuses we hear from Muslims all the time when logic threatens their beliefs.
Yeah, it is readily apparent that Islam is of Satan.
Cool thoughts! That was fun, thanks!
@@AlonzoHarris235 re: _"There is not a single Christian in history who agrees with your modern made up interpretations of Christian sources. This is problematic. You are accusing all Christians in history not understanding the bible. Only modern ‘Christians’ have the Holy Spirit to interpret scripture correctly?"_ >> I'm afraid your comments here are entirely false!! Neither do you state exactly what interpretations, which history and which sources you are talking about! This is effectively waffle!
Secondly, I'm not accusing anybody of anything - this again is false! It is you that is accusing people, not me....and this is the problem with Islam, it is a religion which is fundamentally based upon accusations, antisemitism and anti-Christian arguments. This is to the point that without Christianity and Judaism, there will be no 'Islam'!
One of the ironies about Muslims is that they think Islam will one day take over the entire world and be one giant caliphate, but in reality, if Christianity and Judaism were gone, Islam would collapse because it would no longer have any religious context or relevance. Most Muslims don't even realise this and it hasn't even occurred to them but that's reality.
this is a good idea, here is one. Islam the religion of 'peace' compared to Jesus' teachings. Muhammy is so violent.
Mohammad's teaching
Sura 33:60-61
60 If the hypocrites, the sick of heart, and those who spread lies in the city do not desist, We shall arouse you [Prophet] against them, and then they will only be your neighbors in this city for a short while. 61 They will be rejected wherever they are found, and then seized and k*lled.
Surat An-Nisā' 4:34
Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband's] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance - [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and, "strike" them. But if they obey you, seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand.
Jesus' Teaching
Matthew 5:43-45
"You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven
Ephesians 5:25-28
Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish. In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.
I have to say, as a young earth leaning creationist, i see you all as brothers in Christ! It's like what C.S. Lewis said in Mere Christianity while trying to explain the trinity "if this helps you great, if it doesn't toss it out." People can become far too attached to how they see certain things in scripture that don't matter as much while blindly accepting bad doctrine that does.
I had a dear brother and friend in Christ who was a young earth creationist until his death. I miss him and his fascinating interest in science and faith, but essentially he was my brother in Christ and as he approached death with untreatable cancer, he looked forward to going to be with Jesus. I admired his faith and faithfulness to Jesus!
Accepting the doctrine of evolution in the sense of cell-to-man as a Christian, however, is disingenuous. It makes Death the good guy bringing man into existence.
Materialistic explanations for life from non-life are garbage, and that is from a scientific point of view.
Eileen that way too as far as creation. As important as I might want to make it, it’s a secondary issue at best, maybe a 1.5 tier at most. You are not necessarily a heretic if you get it wrong, but it’s still important. People like Kenham say that it’s a biblical authority issue, but you can still technically be a Christian and believe in an old earth and evolution/millions of years. It doesn’t disfellowshipped you.
@@theonlyway5298 well, whichever one of you is right, he knows it now even if you don’t. I don’t worry. When you get there, you’ll find out whether you were right or wrong. And both of you will rejoice in seeing your Lord, whenever that day comes. All things will be made clear, and there may be yet even more that we don’t know, and could never know. We will have all of eternity in the new heaven in the new earth. Look forward to getting to know our God, even better for all eternity, no? Who knows what we don’t know?!
That was touching about your friend. God bless.
@@blindvision4703 Personally I agree.
I saw some pretty big holes in Muslim Cowboys shorts
I like the evolution fairytale. It is more exciting than the young earth fairytale
Wouldn't be surprising If Yusef and Brandon were really related.
Yeah, the connection makes sense.
Update: I found an old video where Yusuf says they are distant relatives.
@@InspiringPhilosophy Okay, nothing too weird then, thanks.
@@InspiringPhilosophy Most of what you are saying about Islam is lies and you know it is lies to suite your needs as Christian and you believe your own lies. This is pure dishonesty. You lie about the Jewish Tanak to impose your Jesus and trinity on the Jew and now you are lying about Islam to impose your Christianity on Muslims. Without lies Christianity dies.
When you're talking to _followers_ _of_ _paul_ ...
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
Q: Is Jesus the son of Mary?
A: Yes,
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus was born from the mother he created (Mary)
Q: Is Jesus a born son?
A: Yes,
Q: Who is his father?
A: God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus is the father of God Jesus and the creator of the mother he was born from her the son of his wife
Q: Is Jesus the servant of God?
A: Yes,
Q: Did Jesus die on the cross?
A: Yes,
Q: And for whom did he go up?
A: To God
*God Jesus was crucified & ascended to God Jesus
Q: Is Jesus a Messenger?
A: Yes,
Q: Who sent him?
A: God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus was the messenger of God Jesus. God sends himself as a Messenger of himself
Q: Did Jesus pray when he was alive?
A: yes,
Q: Whom was he praying for?
A: For God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus worships God Jesus himself
Q: Does God have a beginning?
A: No
Q: So who was born on December 25th?
A: Jesus
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus is eternal before everything but he was born in 25th Dec
Q: Where is God?
A: In heaven
Q: How many Gods are there in heaven?
A: God is only one.
Q: Where is Jesus sitting?
A: He is sitting on the right of God.
Q: Is Jesus a God?
A: Yes
Q: So how many Gods are there in heaven?
A: Only one God
Q: Where is Jesus?
A: He is sitting to the right of God.
Q: So how many gods are there in heaven?
A: Only one god. Still
Q: Is Jesus a God?
A: Yes
Q: So who many seated gods are there?
A: Only one God?
Q: Where is Jesus?
A: He is sitting next to the god.
Q: How many gods are in heaven?
A: Only one.
Q: Are they sitting on the same chair?
A: These words are understood only by the one who has the holy spirit.
*so.. God sacrificed God to God in order to save God's creation from God. God prayed to God for help but God didn't help God, and God killed God with help from humans. And that God is a father of himself and the mother of himself and the son of mother he created at the same time. He is also eternal but his birthday is...? 🤡
Edit: I shouldn't be allowed on the internet while sleep-deprived. It doesn't change the fact that Rebecca wasn't three.
That's Rachel, not Rebecca
@@NontpNonjo you're right *facepalm* that's why I shouldn't do anything important after not sleeping for two days...
@@AyeletMarom-y6w No sweat. I've been known to make mistakes like that too.
No Rebecca. With the camels etc
"Adam was a Muslim; prove me wrong." Okay, let's begin.
Muslims didn't exist until the 7th Century A.D., while Adam existed around 5000+ B.C.. That is to say, Adam lived many thousand years before the first Muslim existed.
But if you want to say that a Muslim is somebody who follows God/Allah, then what is Adam most known for? -Disobeying God/Allah.
That's not proof. The Quran saying Adam was a Muslim is proof.
@@nunya54 Prove the Quran is true then. Oh, never mind, you can't, since it has already been proven false. Neither eggs nor sperm are generated 'between the ribs and the spine' as the Quran says. The sun does not set in a muddy spring, as the Quran says. Jews do not say or believe or suppose Ezra is the Son of God, as the Quran says. It is a very inaccurate book.
@@nunya54…no?
@@patatoe2124 Sorry, don't know what your no? means.
@@nunya54 I’m sorry. I was being a little snarky. Just no friend. That’s not good evidence for him being a Muslim for people who aren’t a Muslim. It will convince Muslims, just as the Bible will convince Christians and that’s fine and good from an internal view, but you’ll have to give other religions stronger reason to think that.
Much love,
Me
I don't get this idiotic new Islamic argument that all the Jews and ISraelites were Muslim...
I guess what they are trying to get across is that being Jewish isn't a religion, I think fair point. Then you would have to take the next step and say well what did those Judeans follow, they followed Yahwey. so I guess you can call them Yahweists?
Still doesn't make them muslim and even more jsut based on the word alone. It means one who submits. In Judaism or in Hebrew the righteous are called Chassidim, those who are upright.
So I guess maybe Israel/Jacob should be called a Chassid? Still not Muslim. Silliest discussion ever.
They argue that they followed Islam, and then later on they corrupted all their texts so that they could abandon Islam, but for some reason they made sure to keep some incredibly vague and confusing references to Mohammad. Jesus, too, was a Muslim, and his great accomplishment in life was to be so bad at teaching Islam to Muslims that they forced Allah to rescue him from crucifixion... thus kick-starting a huge, false religion, called Christianity. Whoopsie!
IP has a short on this so I'll try to summarize this but basically, it's them being stupid and committing a fallacy. Basically they're using the etymological definition of Islam and applying it to different groups of people in history. However what they fail to realize is this thus makes the word muslim almost meaningless as now anybody who believes in a God is a Muslim as they believe in "the true god". Also it's the second worst argument, the worst argument is when they say because some morality is newer than others that it does not fit and therefore is secular. Imagine saying slavery is bad because it was practiced for all of human history😂
We humans are pretty silly 😜 thank you Jesus for suffering for all silly humans.
As a young creationist myself, I still like you guys
You should get out of that cult while you still can. YEC devalues God's creation
Whatever you believe about that - make sure that your No. 1 faith in to entirely trust Jesus for your salvation and redemption.
@paradisecityX0 when you use the word "cult" to anything, you don't like it just makes the word meaningless.
@theonlyway5298 I agree there is one way to heaven and thar is through grave alone through faith alone, in the one and only God who came down as man to save us from our sins. Whether or not you're a young Creationist isn't a salvation. As I see it, we'll all know the truth when Jesus comes back.
@@littlejohn590 You need some Biologos and Sentinel Apologetics in your life
15:10 "the adversary"
20:30 why is verse 21 missing to begin with? Textual variance from hand writing the same book over and over in the past
53:10 lol
54:20 LOL
2:19:58 would be interesting to find this moment on his podcast...
The Estes guys love music. It is their life! I guess nobody ever told them that music is haram in Islam. 😂
It's easy to claim anyone believing in God to be a muslim, which translates to "subjected to God".
Na you're not gonna throw Young Earth Creationsist under the bus like that. Our position is based on the scriptures as a whole. It is the only view consistent with the bible. Honestly, in a stream about Islam, you should leave YEC out of it.
What would you say about the dinosaur bones that are millions of years old?
Shouldn’t you also consider the earth, and what scientists have found? Scriptures and Gods creation? I don’t really care whether it’s young or old, as it has nothing to do with Salvation.
@@avivastudios2311 Indeed. Never mind carbon dating, there are fossils that were found under so many layers of strata, that either God is a trickster, or Genesis isn't a scientific textbook, or the geological model is orders of magnitude inaccurate, and so ancient cities were really only buried a few days ago.
@@avivastudios2311 They aren't millions of years old. Dinos were made with man on Day 6 of creation. This is easy. The bible is clear on this. If you looked into the circular reasoning and assumptions that undergird the theory of evolution, you should be far less confident in it.
@@o00nemesis00o The fossils were produced as a result of the Great Flood of Noah's day. All of the geologic evidence is consistent with a global flood. The natural world lines up perfectly with God's word since God's word is true. For any christian reading this who holds to the Genesis account of creation not being real history, I ask you, if it is not true... but literally everything about the Christian faith is based on Genesis, then where does that leave your faith? If there was no real Adam who caused the fall, then why do we need a real saviour in Jesus? Why trust anything in the bible if its foundation is a fairytale? Christians! Wake up and stand on the foundation that is Genesis and stop capitulating to atheistic theories!
I cannot remember who brought this up but I agree: Muslim teachers aren't even trying to win over converts any longer, they are trying to retain Muslims. Its not about proselytism, its about stopping the bleeding
Thank you for another wonderful video. I just wanna ask. Can you do a video on Deuteronomy chapter 28 and Luke 6:38 and other verses that seem to advocate for the prosperity Gospel. Because my parents think that there are some things that God has placed laws on and they believe that whatever you sow you will reap more. But I just want you to do video responding to some of these arguments and maybe just explaining how it is wrong to think that God especially loves his children. Or maybe you agree with my parents. Please do a video on verses like these.
Simple. literally before 6:38, Jesus says to constantly give to anyone who asks of you(poor people most likely), and other bits of advocating for extreme charity before capping off with "Do to others as they would do to you." And besides, the reward that is discussed in 6:38 is in the context of Jesus talking about loving, blessing, and forgiving your enemies. Anyone who does that will have "great reward". I very much doubt that said reward is earthly material wealth based on the earlier context. Not to mention he also talks about the reward of heaven before all this. Prosperity Gospel advocates are like internet atheists who love taking things out of context. And you don't even need to read these verses to debunk the Prosperity Gospel. Just look at the lives of the apostles or Jesus himself. All of them had greater faith and love for humanity than we did and performed so many miraculous works. Yet were they rich? No! They were dirt poor and suffered heavily. Yet it didn't matter. For Jesus, it's cause he was God and had an eternal spirit, and for the disciples, it's cause they were powered by the Holy Spirit and the love of Christ.
But why is it wrong to think that God loves his children? If God did not love everyone and does not wish everyone to be with him, it makes him resemble Allah way too much and undermines the emotional weight of the cruxifiction.
Prove to me that Muhammed wasn't a talking goat man.
“Muslim Cowboy’s shorts have pretty pathetic dawah.” What about his shirts?
Hey Mike
Superbeautiful Intro Music 🎶
And also very fruitful content for Christendom.
Thank you brother
From Germany with love ❤️
Brother in Christ
Tom
Name a more iconic duo, I’ll wait
Islam and lying
Shrek and Donkey
Salt 🧂 and pepper 🌶️
Allah and lies.
Hey IP great stream loved it👍🏻
What are your thoughts on this explanation of the trinity?
Mind- The Father
Body- Jesus
Spirit- The Holy Spirit
That may fall under a heresy of partialism
When you're talking to _followers_ _of_ _paul_ ...
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
Q: Is Jesus the son of Mary?
A: Yes,
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus was born from the mother he created (Mary)
Q: Is Jesus a born son?
A: Yes,
Q: Who is his father?
A: God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus is the father of God Jesus and the creator of the mother he was born from her the son of his wife
Q: Is Jesus the servant of God?
A: Yes,
Q: Did Jesus die on the cross?
A: Yes,
Q: And for whom did he go up?
A: To God
*God Jesus was crucified & ascended to God Jesus
Q: Is Jesus a Messenger?
A: Yes,
Q: Who sent him?
A: God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus was the messenger of God Jesus. God sends himself as a Messenger of himself
Q: Did Jesus pray when he was alive?
A: yes,
Q: Whom was he praying for?
A: For God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus worships God Jesus himself
Q: Does God have a beginning?
A: No
Q: So who was born on December 25th?
A: Jesus
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
*God Jesus is eternal before everything but he was born in 25th Dec
Q: Where is God?
A: In heaven
Q: How many Gods are there in heaven?
A: God is only one.
Q: Where is Jesus sitting?
A: He is sitting on the right of God.
Q: Is Jesus a God?
A: Yes
Q: So how many Gods are there in heaven?
A: Only one God
Q: Where is Jesus?
A: He is sitting to the right of God.
Q: So how many gods are there in heaven?
A: Only one god. Still
Q: Is Jesus a God?
A: Yes
Q: So who many seated gods are there?
A: Only one God?
Q: Where is Jesus?
A: He is sitting next to the god.
Q: How many gods are in heaven?
A: Only one.
Q: Are they sitting on the same chair?
A: These words are understood only by the one who has the holy spirit.
*so.. God sacrificed God to God in order to save God's creation from God. God prayed to God for help but God didn't help God, and God killed God with help from humans. And that God is a father of himself and the mother of himself and the son of mother he created at the same time. He is also eternal but his birthday is...? 🤡
@@Durray13 1 im not reading all of that yap
2 you insult me and for what? I do not follow paul i follow christ
3 i would rather be wrong about christ than follow a "god" that justifies murder and pedophilia
@apollo_144, Durray posts this comment over and over on numerous channels. According to YT TOS it is spam. There’s a mechanism to report spam 😉
U are so annoying 🤦♀️🤦♀️ @@Durray13
justice for rob he looks sad rn
He always looks and talks like he's sad 😭
he's not sad, he's australian
The guy I have to laugh at is "The Warner" who's one of the guys literally behind Sneako. He's really bad about just outright making things up about the Bible and Christian beliefs. I'm not sure what else he might go by.
Without lies Islam dies
Yeah, I've seen this guy on X posting the most asinine claims. I think I blocked him because he just cannot be taken seriously
I’m not sure there is a single good analogy for the Trinity. The one that the bill used when talking about subatomic particles being more than one state simultaneously might technically be more like modal, ism, and the argument that David mentioned about the Quran and the multiple readings Sounds a little more like partial God says somewhere in Isaiah (I think it’s chapter 46, but I might be wrong.) and a rhetorical question that there isn’t really anything in nature that we can compare them to. And really, with him being transcendent, something that even Muslim should be able to agree with, that shouldn’t be too surprising.
I’m fully comfortable with old earth creationism, and I would say it’s inconsistent with a plane reading of scripture, but considering I used to try to reconcile the two at one point, I’m not sure it would be right to call an old earth, creationist, just badly mistaken, and inconsistent. I can be willing to concede that some Roman Catholics are saved (I happen to know a confirmed Catholic, who theology firmly evangelical parent, but that’s in spite of Roman Catholic teaching rather than because of it. I don’t think being able to affirm the Nissi and Creed is enough. Lots of churches have a basic doctoral statement that is basically a very simplified version of the Nissi and creed, including the arch, heretic and prosperity gospel preacher, Kenneth Copeland. Suffice it to say that anyone can claim to her from the Nicene creed, but still be a rampant heretic in other respects. so respectfully, Mike Jones, I have to push back on your perspective. God bless.
So what? 'We', I , 'Our', 'My', used in Quran does not negate any of Quran's conclusions or assertions that God is one: Quran still concludes that' Your God is one God, and persistently asserts (starting with nearly every chapter's opening invocation,'In the name of God (not Gods, We or Us) that the one God of everything is the one sufficient God; that uttering, let alone calling to worship other than the one God is blasphemous; that only one God is in control of everything; that His is the creation and the command; commands not say 'three' or one of three' for He is one God; that it is only He that makes people laugh or cry; that He alone has power over intercession; that He begets not, nor He begotten; that there is nothing like Him; so commands to not associate anything (among creation or creation-like) with Him (His is the Creation and His is the Command) etc.. But you refuse to take the whole of Quran as the context to reconcile or ignore surface disparities (which you cannot rule out as being just that since the Quran is also aimed at cursing it's idolatrous raiders bent on blasphemy). Why not,, in subservience to the clarifying monotheistic message of the ENTIRE Quran interpret 'We' as, by the Quran (full of wisdom), the empowered selected champions to do the bidding if the one true inimitable unrivaled God who is not a part of a family of Gods who creates by instant decree so needs not give birth as His creation is subject to, and is truly eternal so He never dies like the multitudes of expiration-dated creation including Jesus, you and I. These champions, by the Quran (warning to raiding idolaters: 'Take the whole Quran as context or leave it alone!') are the 'messengers' (Jesus--spokesperson with the Word from Him, other humans, angels, other dedicated servants of God, both seen and unseen), 'the reciters' , 'the aligners', 'the arrangers', 'the guarders', 'the hosts', the 'snatchers', 'the racers', the 'nightly visitor', 'the spreaders', over whom, God has an unbreakable hold by their very forelocks.
This channel is another example of temple-raiding monkey holding the Quran with one hand and flings feces with the other. You should enter the chamber and close the door when you enter the Quran. But you leave the door open and God will not address you: 'they enter as disbelievers and they exit as disbelievers'-Quran. I, by the grace of the unrivaled transcendent above creation almighty Lord of all Being, am one of the 'We' in Holy Quran; and 'We affirm' that your Lord in One! Now let us wait for the day of Judgement to see which 'We' is rightly guided!
You can play logic logic for sometime but Islam will win in the long term.
Thanks for admitting that truth is not something Islam gives two figs about.
1:01:18 you prove YOUR Adam existed who was 90ft tall then I will address your silly argument which can be debunked by historical FACTS!
Thanks for what y'all do!
He doesn't look like a cowboy in a western movie
Correct me if I'm wrong
Modern Hindus say that there are (from millions to) Four gods but they all are one, Christians say that there are three gods but they all are one, Yohowa Witness say that there are two gods but they are one, Finaly, Islam says that there is One and only One GOD.
We say there is one God in Christianity so you’re wrong lil bro.
3 persons, one essence, one God. 😝
Thesist evolution is heretical. God said he created.
Theistic evolution affirms God created.
@@bruhmingo no it doesn't, it literally says the opposite. It's simultaneously holding the beliefs that God both created and didn't create. Which holding contradictory beliefs is a sign of insanity
@@potatoheadpokemario1931 OK. Well, if you're going to call people insane just for disagreeing... cast your mind back to the last time you did a number 2 in the toilet. Did God create that number 2? If you say no, then you agree that God can create and not create. If you say yes, then you either have to say that God indirectly created the number 2 by creating the original matter which eventually entered your digestion after a very long time, in which case, you still agree with your horribly worded premise that "God can create and yet not create"..... or, you have to say that God destroyed the food as you ate it, and created a number 2 especially for you... in which case, God is the only literal bulls-t artist.
Guys I love your channels and your all helping me with my faith but can you please stop going over the same point over and over like your talking to 4 year olds. Adam was a Muslim being a stupid thing to say is not hard to understand. Give your audience a little more credit, we are not all morons.
Thanks Rob for the shoutout to the creationist community.
Why punctuation is impotrant: David Wood IP through the shorts of the Muslim Cowboy
Was Adam a Muslim?
To be a Muslim, amongst other things you must say the Shahada: there is no god but Thegod and Mohammed is the messenger.of Thegod.
But Adam had never even heard of Mohammed, and Mohammed had certainly not acted as Jibril's messenger yet, so at best Adam would have been telling a lie by saying that Mohammed was *then* Thegod's messenger.
Adam could have been many things, but if he couldn't be a Jew because Moses hadn't been born yet, or a Christian because Jesus hadn't been born yet, then he couldn't be a Muslim because Mohammed hadn't been born yet either.
I acknowledge that Muslims believe the Qur'an always existed, like Thegod, but that doesn't mean that the Qur'an was in Adam's hands. And without the hadith to guide him in the interpretation of the Qur'an, how would he have known what it meant? What sense would it have made to expect Adam to ponder the fate of people and peoples who would not exist for many millennia? Surely nobody thinks the hadith have always existed?
don't know the Rob dude but when he shows up he meanders and never makes a point and puts a damp blanket on everything. I hope he won't keep being invited to David and Mike's RUclips parties because he's no fun, not cringey low intelligence and constantly just repeating whatever someone just said like David's usual partner but still pretty bad. Hope in the future David and Mike will just do youtube streams together and over time, David will lose some of his grosser tendencies and Mike his nerdier tendencies and they will create almost perfect youtube streams because they are both smart enough which seems to be a rare commodity these days. Sorry for the harsh judgements but the truth is the truth.
I googled "Mike Jones rapper" ...
...it is personal man, everyone alone with alquran, if you find it as a guidence is good for you but if you don't, fasiq...so ask for forgiveness...❤
what they mean is that Adam would have been a Muslim because he did what God said and obeyed God. That is the Muslim way of thinking
That's the way it is right
Pagans also obeyed God so were they Muslims ?
1:01:20
Adam was the first man and was a Muslim prove me wrong.
Prove a negative?
Without the swing of the sword and lies. Islam dies.
Jesus power.❤its a gift for all.1107 eastren night😮
Cowboy 🎵🎶
I think the Muslim cowboy is trolling Islam. I don’t think he actually cares about Islam.
Lol, Mohammed was indeed white
Yusuf ain't got nothin on momlinial.🤣
Two scam artist attacking Islam misleading for money
What kind of cowboy don’t drink
From, The Irreparable Loss of Much of the Quran
According to one report by the son of the second caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab, the present text of the Quran is incomplete since much of it has disappeared:
`Abdullah b. `Umar reportedly said, 'Let none of you say, "I have got the whole of the Qur'an." How does he know what all of it is? MUCH OF THE QUR'AN HAS GONE. Let him say instead, "I have got what has survived."' (Jalal al Din `Abdul Rahman b. Abi Bakr al Suyuti, al-Itqan fi `ulum al-Qur'an, Halabi, Cairo, 1935/1354, Volume 2, p. 25)
We find this same narration cited in Abu Ubaid’s Kitab Fadail-al-Qur’an:
Said Abu ‘Ubaid:
Isma’il b. Ibrahim related to us from Ayyub from Nafi‘ from Ibn ‘Umar who said - Let none of you say, “I have learned the whole of the Koran,” for how does he know what the whole of it is, WHEN MUCH OF IT HAS DISAPPEARED? Let him rather say, “I have learned what is extant thereof.” (Ibn Warraq, Origins of the Koran - Classic Essays on Islam’s Holy Book [Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY 1998], Part Two: The Collections and the Variants of the Koran, 9. Abu ‘Ubaid on the Verses Missing from the Koran, by Arthur Jeffery, p. 151: bold, capital and underline emphasis ours)
The Shia apologists over at the Answering Ansar website have provided another source for this narrative along with its chain of transmitters, demonstrating that this is a reliable report:
One of the early Sunni scholars Qasim bin Salam (d. 222 H) records:
حدثنا إسماعيل بن إبراهيم ، عن أيوب ، عن نافع ، عن ابن عمر ، قال : « لا يقولن أحدكم قد أخذت القرآن كله وما يدريه ما كله ؟ قد ذهب منه قرآن كثير ، ولكن ليقل : قد أخذت منه ما ظهر منه
Ismail bin Ibrahim narrated from Ayub from Naf’ee from Ibn Umar who said: ‘Verily among you people one would say that he has found the Quran whilst he is unaware of what the total quantity of the Quran was, because most of the Quran has been lost. Rather one should say that verily he has found the Quran that has appeared.’
Ismail bin Ibrahim: Dahabi said: ‘Hujja’ (Al-Kashif, vol. 1, p. 242), Ibn Hajar said: ‘Thiqah’ (Taqrib al-Tahdib, vol. 1 p. 90). Ayub al-Sekhtiani: Dahabi said: ‘The master of scholars’ (Siar alam alnubala, vol. 6, p. 15), Ibn Hajar said: ‘Thiqah Thabt Hujja’ (Taqrib al-Tahdib, vol. 1, p. 116). Naf’ee: Dahabi said: ‘The Imam of Tabayeen’ (Al-Kashif, vol. 2, p. 315), Ibn Hajar said: ‘Thiqah Thabt’ (Taqrib al-Tahdib, vol. 2, p. 239). (Fadhail al-Quran by Qasim bin Salam, Volume 2 p. 135) (Who believes the Quran has been a victim of Tahreef?, Chapter Eight: Sunni reports about deletions from the Quran; underline emphasis ours)
From, Some Ahadith of Omission
6. Loss of the major part of the Qur'an: There are a lot of traditions in Sunni books which show that the Qur'an was much much more than what the Muslims have in their hands. "At-Tabarani has narrated with trustworthy chain of narrators from 'Umar ibn al-Khattab that he said, 'The Qur'an is one million and twenty seven thousand letters..."12 But the total of the letters in the whole Qur'an is not more than 267,053 as is recorded at the end of many editions of the Qur'an. In other words, three-fourth of the Qur'an was lost!
And the companion 'Abdullah ibn 'Umar is reported as saying, "None of you should ever say, 'I have got the whole Qur'an.' And what would make you know what the whole Qur'an was. Certainly a lot of Qur'an has gone. One should rather say, 'I have got what has appeared from it."
Inspiring philosophy, can you do a video on an atheist you tuber name theological the RUclipsr of this channel is Derek Bennett. He is the author of many books and he claims that Jesus and Christianity stole from all the other pagan gods and they are similarities in the stories, such as Romulus Osiris, and so many more, and I would like you to do a video on him please.❤
I commented in one of his videos I said Jesus is aully
Reminds me as the visage of an eagle, uses his talons to rip and tear the unlearned to bits exposing the underbelly of corruption of moronic ignorance ---David Wood
Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Amr:
that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "Take the Qur'an from four: From Ibn Mas'ud, Ubayy bin Ka'b, Mu'adh bin Jabal, and Salim the freed slave of Abu Hudhaifah." Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3810
A better analogy (there is no perfect) for the trinity than government, is a magnetic field as God, and the poles as two persons, perhaps their mediation as a third. But it works with two as well, as it's an analogy.
Each pole is in the whole field, and there is no action of the field that does not involve the entire field and two poles. Yet, the south and north are distinguishable, though not seperable.
The government is made up of seperable parts, so it's not a good analogy.
Reality really lays itself out more like a field and less as the categories our left brain hemisphere loves to cut it into.
All persons, you included, also exist in a field, and are not really seperable from the rest, each person in existence is made up of the whole, as a focal point.
They tried to take down the down but IP is a 🇹🇩
36:52 Michael's reaction XDDDDDDDDD
There are only seven lampstands of God. The Menorah is one. The Latin Cross another. There is no lampstand for Islam, or indeed any organisation after Christ.
Islam is so confusing they say there's only one translation of the quran oh some other group of muslims say theres 20 of them they say the quran can only be read in arabic but many others say the quran can be read in the other languages too
and they said Christians were the diverse ones
The MEANING of the Quran can be read in any language because there are many translations. There's just ONE original Quran though.
That is true, it just annoys me how some Muslims say that Christians are confusing , then I find that they are even more confusing when I look into it.@@nunya54
@@dogheist2062 Islam is a very easy religion to understand. The basics are simple. Worship God alone, God is unique, one similar to Judaism. It is also very deep and detailed though as well. Also like Judaism in some ways, with similar laws, similar to what Jesus followed but not quite as harsh.
It is difficult and confusing to them, being strict monotheists to understand God being three, becoming a human, being a Jew, dying and being born. Those are not concepts in Judaism or Islam. No one can really say the Trinity is not confusing; even those who wrote the doctrine didn't understand the matter they were settling.
@@nunya54 The Trinity isn't confusing, Saint Patrick had a clear understanding of the Trinity, he used shamrocks to explain one shamrock is the eternal God, the three leaves that the shamrock has are the members of the Trinity Father, Son, and Holy Spirit it's really that simple.
Then the quran on the other hand its original translation isn't modern but classical Arabic which means modern Arabs even don’t understand it.
Even more worse, classical Arabian scholars can’t understand parts of the quran. For example, GERD-R. Puin says, “The Koran claims for itself that it is ‘muben,’ or ‘clear,’ but if you look at it, you will notice that every fifth sentence or so simply doesn’t make sense … the fact is that a fifth of the Koranic text is incomprehensible. This is what has caused the traditional anxiety regarding the translation. If the Koran is not comprehensible-if it can’t even be understood in Arabic-then it’s not translatable. People fear that. And since the Koran claims repeatedly to be clear but obviously is not-as even speakers of Arabic will tell you-there is a contradiction.”
@@nunya54 The Trinity isn't confusing, Saint Patrick had a clear understanding of the Trinity, he used shamrocks to explain one shamrock is the eternal God, the three leaves that the shamrock has are the members of the Trinity Father, Son, and Holy Spirit it's really that simple.
Then the quran on the other hand its original translation isn't modern but classical Arabic which means modern Arabs even don’t understand it.
Even more worse, classical Arabian scholars can’t understand parts of the quran. For example, GERD-R. Puin says, “The Koran claims for itself that it is ‘muben,’ or ‘clear,’ but if you look at it, you will notice that every fifth sentence or so simply doesn’t make sense … the fact is that a fifth of the Koranic text is incomprehensible. This is what has caused the traditional anxiety regarding the translation. If the Koran is not comprehensible-if it can’t even be understood in Arabic-then it’s not translatable. People fear that. And since the Koran claims repeatedly to be clear but obviously is not-as even speakers of Arabic will tell you-there is a contradiction.”
Regarding how do Muslims clean after toileting? They actually use their Hand. They only use one hand - so that is an odd number as well.
Muslims don't have to use their hand.
@@nunya54 From personal experience: they do, if there isn't a bidet available. I knew a Muslim medical student once.
@@o00nemesis00o I said don't have to. They, of course, can, especially if there's nothing else. They have to be clean
Hello Michael, you and David should go on modern debates and debate atheists and Muslims with David.
My replies are being deleted. I guess RUclips doesn't like what I have to say about evolution.
Logic is islamophobic
The woman should have offered to make the cowboy a meal like the one Muhamed got at Khaybar.
Cuz i have heard that in the west number 17 n 21 is considered bad...is this true
I quit watching the 3rd time YEC was attacked for no reason and with no support. I don't care if someone believes the earth is old. It's not a salvific issue. I'm not going to sit here and listen to some dude with half my IQ take pot shots at me when I can actually understand the math and physics, though. If he wants to show that he's not just running his mouth, I'll provide a list of challenges that if he proves even one of, I'll apologize for implying he's two standard deviations below average intelligence.
Option 1) If you like chemistry, prove Dr. James Tour is wrong. Create life in the lab from non-life in a prebiotic environment.
Option 2) If you like physics, create an equation that prevents the different methods of radiometric dating from producing incompatibly different ages for rocks, and prove that it gives reliable results for the ages by testing on rocks of known age, then use it to confirm that the earth is old.
Option 3) If you like biology, prove that randomly occurring mutations in cells not only aren't overwhelmingly deleterious, and don't result in information loss, but rather that they cause lifeforms to become more complex and function better.
Any of those three things would be compelling evidence that at least an aspect of your worldview is possible. Until then, if you're going to keep your head up your butt, at least take your foot out of your mouth before speaking on the topic again, please.
Thanks for sticking up for YEC!!! I'm not even 100% a YEC, but I know there's scientific and philosophical support for it. The fact that some Christians scoff and mock it is ... shocking. They are behaving like atheists.
Ephesians 4:31-32, Phillippians 2:3-5, Ephesians 4:26-27
If you're so smart, how do you not know that your first and third arguments are not even valid in this discussion? These aren't atheists, don't strawman them.
I don't like that side of IP, it's insulting, prideful and atheist-like in nature. We're all flawed but he's putting himself on the public stage so should conduct himself properly.
Imagine calling yourself a yeck
34K view you know it's doesn't do good when the dislike is big :v
Yee haw li lah
Adam was not a Muslim in the sense of one submitted to God in that his Rebellion against God is the source of all the worlds woes, including the 71 sects that you do not follow - because of course yours is the true islam- and he was not a Muslim in that Satan had not yet poured into Mohammed's eager ear the lies that would poison the world, and so could not have recited the Sahadah, had he been so so bereft of good sense to want to.
Hey, don't be so mean to Satan. If not for Satan tempting us to sin, Allah says he "would have wiped [humanity] from the face of the Earth, and replaced [us] with a new people who would commit sin". Satan was cast out of Jannah for refusing to bow to anyone besides Allah. All the other angels commited shirk.
Satan is THE good guy of Islam. Stop being mean about him.
I get it!! Dan McClellan smokes you and you smoke someone with lesser knowledge. This is the equivalent of an eighth grade bully picking on a sixth grader. I mean really Michael!?!? I’m just curious as to whether or not you have done any videos critiquing Dan the Man!? I mean I’ve seen several of his where he’s smoked your ass, but never the other way around.
Is this Dan's alt? 💀
Did Rob have a mini-Chtulu on his shoulder?
Explain what you mean by Christian evolutionists , dose that mean you believe Adam evolved from a different sub human creature?
How can this reconcile with the bible ?
Do you mean, "how would it come to be that Man was made specifically in God's image, if Man had origins in other creatures"? Because, that is a good question to ask. However, Christian evolutionists don't have to answer that question, because there is no reason that evolution can't exist and yet for God to decide to pop Adam into existence based on a similar design. What we do know for sure is that the Earth is much older than a few thousand years old. God is not a trickster. That's for Allah.
02:00:11 from one false gospel to another false gospel 🤦♂️
Imagine if he said 1+1+1=1? Or we believe in nonsense like a man-god dieing for your sins?
What's 1x1x1? Also, if you're a Muslim, you are required to believe that a Jew or Christian will be used to pin your sins onto.
is Mike Jones a retired Marine?
Yes
Who? Mike Jones!
He’s a retired rapper, formerly signed to Swishahouse records.
Mike Jones is a ripoff of prior pagan myths
@@calebadcock363Hahahaha. That’s funny
The last guy to come on gives same vibes as the people they critique.
What Website is that? The one about variants in the Quran.
58:48 ilahat is plural for ilah and allah is a different word.
aah
Oh , Hi David
Lol
It's only a "royal wee" if the monarch is on the throne
it is called " dialogue of the deaf "
1:50:19
1:42:50