Ch 1: Why linear algebra? | Maths of Quantum Mechanics

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 янв 2023
  • Hello!
    This is the first chapter in my series "Maths of Quantum Mechanics." In this episode, we'll go over why we should use linear algebra as the starting point for all quantum mechanics.
    If you have any questions or comments, shoot me an email at:
    quantumsensechannel@gmail.com
    Thanks!
    3Blue1Brown's "Essence of Linear Algebra":
    Link: • Vectors | Chapter 1, E...
    Animations:
    All animations created by me within Python, using Manim. To learn more about Manim and to support the community, visit here:
    Link: www.manim.community/
    Music:
    --------------------------------------------------------------
    ♪ Astral 7 by Patricia Taxxon
    Link : patriciataxxon.bandcamp.com/a...
    --------------------------------------------------------------

Комментарии • 315

  • @alexanderkruszewski7306
    @alexanderkruszewski7306 Год назад +267

    As a high school physics teacher, I love that content like this is being made which I can share with those students who are hungry for these higher level concepts but are still early on in their mathematical understanding (pre-calculus). Having these clear conceptual bridges with strong essential questions guiding each chapter is both pedagogically sound and a great example of a scientific thinking when walking through the unknown.

    • @narfwhals7843
      @narfwhals7843 Год назад +1

      I'm curious. Can you often grab your students attention by telling them how weird and physics is going to get when they get to quantum mechanics or is there some recommendation against that in high school?

    • @jamesbentonticer4706
      @jamesbentonticer4706 Год назад +2

      @@narfwhals7843 I'm not a physics teacher but when I was my final EM course just before QM, my professor said 'get ready to forget everything you've learned in classical mechanics because all that intuition soon goes out the window'.

    • @narfwhals7843
      @narfwhals7843 Год назад +6

      @@jamesbentonticer4706 And did that make you think "whoa that's awesome I can't wait to get mindblown!" or did you think "wow so all this was just a waste of time so far?"
      I'm curious how useful this "undoing" of what we learn first really is.

    • @Alan-zf2tt
      @Alan-zf2tt Год назад +1

      @@narfwhals7843 That is science. Try reading through any science or technology book written before 1950 or even 1923. You will surely see societal values dominant over science values (or maybe not?). That is why science is neither Pure nor Applied. It is both

    • @kashyaptandel5212
      @kashyaptandel5212 Год назад +1

      definetely me! whenever our sir Introduce new concpets and equations like Heisenberg uncertainty principle, Bohr’s quantization of angular momentum etc I always ask HOW did the physicist even came up with it why is planck’s constant there (seriously it shows up eeverywhere!) he’d just say it’s derived but it’s complicated for you to understand, so I lead my curiousity to youtube.

  • @frankzenter8844
    @frankzenter8844 Год назад +106

    Proposal for two more chapters:
    - What is the tensor product of Hilbert spaces and why does it matter?
    - What is the logic of a Hilbert space and why does it matter?

    • @angelmendez-rivera351
      @angelmendez-rivera351 Год назад +10

      The logic of a Hilbert space is that (a) the concept of an inner product makes sense in a Hilbert space, and this is important, because the inner product is a generalization of the intuitive notion encoded in the dot product. To put it even more simply: Hilbert spaces are spaces where the concept of "projection" makes sense. This is not true for arbitrary vector spaces; (b) Hilbert spaces are spaces with a completeness property. This means that the concept of limits in such spaces is well-defined, and so you can differentiate, integrate, find series expansions, evaluate limits of sequences, and more. These are all absolutely necessary for doing physics. Fundamentally speaking, physics is an applied form of the theory of differential equations, so if the vector space you are working with does not allow differentiation, then you cannot do physics with said space.
      Hilbert spaces are exactly those vector spaces satisfying both (a) and (b). This means that if one of the two properties is not satisfied, then the space in question is not a Hilbert space.

    • @wrox2757
      @wrox2757 Год назад

      @@angelmendez-rivera351 vector spaces that do not allow differentiation is a new thing. Could you please explain it in more detail or provide me some resources. Thanks.

    • @angelmendez-rivera351
      @angelmendez-rivera351 Год назад +8

      @@wrox2757 There is nothing new about it: most vector spaces you will ever encounter lack a concept of differentiation. For a very elementary example, consider the pairs of rational numbers (q, r). These pairs form a vector space with their usual operations, but you cannot do calculus with them. This is because rational numbers, despite being dense and Archimedean, lack the completeness property that the real numbers have. This is actually what defines the real numbers: they are the completion of the rational numbers. You need the completeness property to do calculus, because you need limits to do calculus, and limits are only well-defined when you have the completeness property.

    • @angelmendez-rivera351
      @angelmendez-rivera351 Год назад +9

      As for the tensor product of Hilbert spaces, it is basically the most general vector spaces of pairs of vectors, where one vector belongs to one vector space, and the other from the other space, intuitively. It matters, because tensor products are the only mathematically coherent way of studying multi-particle systems. Individual particles are characterized by Hilbert spaces with certain conditions, and operators acting on those spaces. So, systems of multiple particles are characterized by tensor products of those individual systems. This is especially important when talking about quantum entanglement, but we are getting ahead of ourselves. These topics will, if the series continues at the pacing I predict, be covered much later down the line.

    • @5ty717
      @5ty717 Год назад

      @@angelmendez-rivera351genius!

  • @ruben-en4jz
    @ruben-en4jz Год назад +58

    I going to watch all of your videos.
    it seems to me that you are the ''3Blue1Brown'' of physiscs :)
    please keep making these videos.

  • @Arnaz87
    @Arnaz87 Год назад +146

    I love that youtube is learning to recommend good and interesting videos super early now.
    This is a great concept with beautiful style, and I'm excited to see the full series! Please keep it up, I hope you get the audience you deserve.

    • @logosecho8530
      @logosecho8530 Год назад +3

      It's truly wonderful. "The algorithm" is usually a ruthless beast that wants nothing but your engagement but I keep finding gems of education.

    • @miro.s
      @miro.s Год назад +1

      SVD is a powerfull tool of projections :)

  • @SoundVoltage
    @SoundVoltage Год назад +7

    I'm really glad to see your series truly start. Your preview videos were pretty influential in how my own recent videos have been produced. Here's to a long, successful run!

  • @ajadamd
    @ajadamd Год назад +15

    as a physics undergrad student, this is one of the best videos i’ve seen on qm and really helps to give an appreciation of the subject

  • @lucamattioni7690
    @lucamattioni7690 Год назад +4

    Cheers for the new beginning! This videos seem very intuitive indeed! Congrants: I'm very impatient for the next episodes

  • @userant
    @userant Год назад +7

    Decades ago I took QM but failed to appreciate it 'fully' and have always wanted to return to it. Now retired and with RUclips at hand I'm giving it another try. Thank you Quantum Sense for making it sense and ,more importantly, enjoyable. Congratulations, this is brilliant !

  • @jamiecolclough1852
    @jamiecolclough1852 7 месяцев назад +1

    Fantastic video, was looking everywhere for a 3blue1brown for Physics and you're the best I've seen.

  • @hubertorhant8884
    @hubertorhant8884 Год назад +5

    Awesome, clear, intuitive, comprehensive. Mapping the physical ontology and the mathematical paradigm attached. Can't wait to build a knowledge of quantum mechanics. 👍

  • @samuelvaldezgil
    @samuelvaldezgil Год назад +1

    It has been a pleasure to find such series, and I wanted to thank you for spending the time and effort into making this fascinating model more understandable. From the perspective of a second year physic's bachelor student I find it extraordinarily useful. It is through passionate and genuine people like you that this world becomes a better place. Thanks again.

  • @stevenschilizzi4104
    @stevenschilizzi4104 Год назад +2

    A brilliant idea this series! Thanks for putting the effort. It’s quite illuminating for non-specialists like myself but who nevertheless are not satisfied with the usual “hand waving” approach using analogies. Getting an intuition for the math is probably the best way to “understand” QM fir what it is: a rather strange beast from the point of view of our everyday experience. Thanks again!

  • @frizzarazz
    @frizzarazz Год назад +4

    A very fundamental question, often overlooked by other channels. Well done!

  • @z.a.s.5615
    @z.a.s.5615 10 месяцев назад +1

    Currently studying Quantum Mechanics at the senior undergraduate level and I am thankful to have stumbled upon this channel!

  • @alejrandom6592
    @alejrandom6592 Год назад +13

    It's amazing that 3b1b's essence of LA is so well made that it sets up a standard for LA intuition

  • @Faridbuza
    @Faridbuza Год назад

    This video and those promised to come from the same teacher are extremely important and unique in that they go into the mathematics of quantum physics, something that is not touched on in most of the videos currently available online.
    Please, continue to make these videos as you proposed and promised ❤ Thank you so much.

  • @sp3148
    @sp3148 5 месяцев назад +1

    Brilliant! Exactly the type of super clear lesson I was looking for. Great job!

  • @khalidhabib9195
    @khalidhabib9195 10 месяцев назад +1

    i shall remain indebted to u all my life,, i have been waiting for such a course for a decade now.
    Thank u very much sir.

  • @postpunkjustin
    @postpunkjustin Год назад +2

    Fantastic video. I love the approach and the visuals are great. Keep it up!

  • @nemooverdrive760
    @nemooverdrive760 Год назад +1

    Great video, perfect timing. I had a random urge today to explore this topic. Will be g through the whole series ☺️.

  • @yungmaz13
    @yungmaz13 Год назад +6

    0:42 There is this youtuber I recommend called Parth G who doesn’t just explain the maths of a few concepts of quantum mechanics but also other concepts in physics like Maxwell’s equations

  • @amritawasthi7030
    @amritawasthi7030 Год назад +1

    Damn, I'm very happy to discover your channel. Love the work thank you for all this effort. A very happy new year !

  • @jneal4154
    @jneal4154 Год назад

    Wonderful! Love this series already. Thanks for sharing!

  • @p.m.rangarajan1055
    @p.m.rangarajan1055 Год назад +1

    OMG. This is the series I have been waiting for. Thank you sir for spreading the knowledge ❤

  • @virushk
    @virushk 6 месяцев назад

    Wow, Just finishing ch 1 I can already tell this is going to be a great series. You have a gift for teaching this complicated subject no one else can!

  • @larianton1008
    @larianton1008 Год назад +1

    Lets go! super exited for this!

  • @williamworthy4091
    @williamworthy4091 Год назад +1

    Great stuff, excited for the rest

  • @user-nf6jl9cg1t
    @user-nf6jl9cg1t Год назад +5

    I was looking for a series like this for a long time! I took a course in quantum mechanics that is not really for physcists so I missed on most of the math behind it

  • @meofamily4
    @meofamily4 2 месяца назад +1

    Before you got into the argument, I was skeptical of the "good start" you spoke of. Yet, within a few steps, your presentation looked just like a vector. Well done.

  • @Hamza-zz3zc
    @Hamza-zz3zc Год назад

    Very good episode !! Now it really makes more sense how the quantum physics works !!
    Thanks a lot and keep it up 😊

  • @anonymoushawk962
    @anonymoushawk962 Год назад

    Bro, you're a life saver please do more content!! I wish I found this before my midterm.

  • @kamkwok3835
    @kamkwok3835 Год назад

    I like how you can explain such an opaque subject with clarity and insight. Thank you.

  • @quantum4everyone
    @quantum4everyone Год назад +5

    Thanks for the video. I look forward to the rest of the series. I do have a few comments, and I suspect you know these, but I am of the philosophy that we should teach in a way that we do not have to unteach. The first comment is that the experiment you describe is a quite fictitious one. The closest one could get to the experiment you propose would be to shine light of an energy higher than the ionization potential and then measure the kinetic energy of the emitted electrons and from that infer the bound-state energy. But, of course, each measurement must have a spread to it as the experiment is repeated, because the light shone in will be from a wavepacket so its energy is not well-defined, and unless you have actively excited the atoms, they will all be in the ground state so it won’t show the behavior you desire to use for the example. Second, I believe it is very important to distinguish between abstract vectors and operators and the representation of them as coordinates of vectors and matrices. But here, they are described as the same, or at least could be easily confused as being the same. Finally, the example you give, of an atom, is a classic example that has both discrete bound states and continuum states. But, your presentations sounds like it has only bound states.

  • @vishrutpandya3257
    @vishrutpandya3257 Год назад +1

    Great job! As a student, i always wanted this specific approach to QM. Thanks a lot!!

  • @rodomoyo9122
    @rodomoyo9122 Год назад +1

    this seems so great, i’m in ib hl physics and my teacher who is a mechanical engineer doesn’t like nuclear and quantum physics but i find quantum to be so fascinating so this is a great way to learn more. I’m only in calculus ab so we’ll see how this goes and i might have to do some background research to understand the more complex math

  • @vextronx
    @vextronx Год назад

    I absolutely love videos like this, great quality!

  • @bernardomarques4306
    @bernardomarques4306 Год назад +12

    This is awesome!! I'm majoring in physics and I'm super glad youtube recommended me this series so early on. Keep it up!

  • @muhammadumairahmad9281
    @muhammadumairahmad9281 Год назад +2

    Pleased keep continue to teach the concepts of quantum mechanics in easy way
    I watched your video firsts time and I loved it.
    Usually i don't comment on any video but your fantastic video and your style force me to comment

  • @user-wr4yl7tx3w
    @user-wr4yl7tx3w Год назад

    Cool. Looking forward to the series. RUclips recommendation finally worked.

  • @assburgers3457
    @assburgers3457 Год назад

    This is amazing. I love the use of an actual experiment to start developing a mathematical representation

  • @osotrop
    @osotrop Год назад +1

    great video love to follow full series

  • @jonathanporter7601
    @jonathanporter7601 Год назад

    Thanks so much! Really enjoyed this and you’re right, it fills a hole in the material that’s available!

  • @eliaderenda2041
    @eliaderenda2041 Год назад +1

    This series is awesome! Keep going and thanks

  • @r4fa3l59
    @r4fa3l59 Год назад

    Amazing work! Keep up with it!

  • @PabloSantiago
    @PabloSantiago Год назад

    Thank you very much for all of this. Looking forward to it

  • @diegopg7186
    @diegopg7186 Месяц назад

    Simply brilliant, a magnificent video!

  • @johnstuder847
    @johnstuder847 Год назад

    Wonderful, clear, refined, concise style. Illuminating in so many ways. Thank you!
    Hope you can do a series on quantum computing.

  • @elyazrhiyassine1915
    @elyazrhiyassine1915 3 месяца назад

    hey how r u !! i just want to thank you for this kind of video.understanding the true meaning of physics and mathematics is the essence of these sciences.i hope you produce a lot of content like this

  • @Mathmatics3.14
    @Mathmatics3.14 3 месяца назад +1

    Now, I can finally watch this after being done watcing the Essence of Linear Algebra by 3Blue1Brown

  • @davidpalomino9138
    @davidpalomino9138 Год назад +3

    An introduction to spinors would be amazing too!

  • @ayhamhalalsheh221
    @ayhamhalalsheh221 Год назад +2

    finally , we have been waiting for to long

  • @tomgargan8339
    @tomgargan8339 Год назад +7

    Eyyy, let’s go!

  • @amoghk.m.6769
    @amoghk.m.6769 Год назад +2

    Quantum mechanics is a subject which I learnt by just blindly accepting a lot of things. While everything seemed more and more consistent the deeper I got into it, in the beginning, it was such an ordeal to feel confident in the subject and know whether I understood stuff right. A lot of times, things didn't make sense. And that feeling lingered for a very long time.
    After having gone through all fourteen videos in this series, I think your approach to the subject is really helpful and refreshing!

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 11 месяцев назад +1

      Except that he didn't explain to you the actual reason for the linearity and unitarity. ;-)

  • @davidhuo6902
    @davidhuo6902 Год назад +1

    wow, it does give me more intuitive image on the connection between math and quantum, thanks

  • @jakublizon6375
    @jakublizon6375 11 месяцев назад

    This is why I love RUclips as of late. The educational videos are just so damn good. Especially with newer creators who understand what previous lessons were missing.
    You
    Highly Entropic Mind
    3b1b (he's big, but for good reason)
    I still like PBS spacetime but it's not mathy enough for me.

  • @Anamikaaaa
    @Anamikaaaa 2 месяца назад

    Great initiative. Very niche approach .thank you so much

  • @matveyshishov
    @matveyshishov Год назад

    Thank you so much for your awesomely clear and deep explanations!

  • @Forever._.curious..
    @Forever._.curious.. Год назад +1

    Yu r serving curiosity ❤️ nd thts grt

  • @JMC-35
    @JMC-35 Год назад +1

    Hello. Wahoo such a good way to explain the maths of quantum mechanics. I eagerly await follow-up. many thanks from france

  • @michaelaristidou2605
    @michaelaristidou2605 Год назад +1

    Excellent video!

  • @GH-li3wj
    @GH-li3wj Год назад +2

    Interesting question, realy awesome video, few remarks, Linear algebra is already there in classical mechanic, Rotation, translation are linear operations , Newton law is linear relation between vectors. Eigen vectors etc are computed to determine the proper modes of a classical mechanical system. I am not sure the Linear Maths are bound to the Quantum world. The peculiar nature of Quantum world is elsewhere, the discrete nature is definitly the signature of the quantum world.

  • @khaliliskarous2225
    @khaliliskarous2225 Год назад +2

    This is really beautifully done! Your urge to explain is highly appreciated. Any plans for a similar QFT series?

  • @colorx6030
    @colorx6030 Год назад +2

    This seems really interesting! I always wanted to dive deeper in the world of Quantum Mechanics but I never really found a good opportunity to. But now I did.
    That said, I'd probably study the prerequisites first before watching this series since I feel like it would be a waste if I just watched this without understanding anything.

  • @shamantdesai930
    @shamantdesai930 Месяц назад

    Elegant explanation, thanks a ton!

  • @physicsbutawesome
    @physicsbutawesome Год назад +1

    Finally, you did it!

  • @nutmeggaming11261
    @nutmeggaming11261 Год назад +1

    You ought to have more subscribers. You have wonderful content

  • @lucahaines4655
    @lucahaines4655 Год назад +1

    Amazing video!

  • @jamesbentonticer4706
    @jamesbentonticer4706 Год назад +12

    Awesome, been wondering about this for a while now. I just bought the 3rd edition QM by David Griffiths. Really looking forward to your series.

    • @mastershooter64
      @mastershooter64 Год назад +4

      Once you finish griffths, do shankar, it's very good!

    • @jamesbentonticer4706
      @jamesbentonticer4706 Год назад +1

      @@mastershooter64 I will. Thank you for the recommendation.

  • @kashyaptandel5212
    @kashyaptandel5212 Год назад

    plz never stop making these videos!

  • @miuomiuopishi2201
    @miuomiuopishi2201 Год назад +1

    Hi man, good job, please as soon as possible put next chapters in youtube, i need your knowledge. Thanks lots of millions millions ... ❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @jonathan.gasser
    @jonathan.gasser Год назад

    Can't wait for the rest!

  • @mofazzalhossain2944
    @mofazzalhossain2944 Год назад +1

    I simply loved your video, sir.

  • @ToriKo_
    @ToriKo_ Год назад +3

    I’m very ignorant, so the leaps I’m making (and the words I am using) are very likely wrong.
    But this is the first time I’ve ever seen how the ‘shape/form/description’ of the wave function is just an outcome of us wanting to describe the type of data we get when we try to measure/interact with quantum (quantized) systems. Instead of it being some arbitrarily abstract object sent to us from the heavens. And we can compared to classical systems where we can represent stuff with a continuous function. Thank you for letting me see something about our world for the first time
    The assumptions I’m making here are that the ‘linear combination’ of the set values (8:35) is going to turn into a ‘wave function’
    One important thing I am still unclear on however, is if the language-based description of a wave function as ‘all the states happening, only after which we get a singular answer’ is an artefact of the mathematics we use to describe the system or an actual transparent view of the underlying physical phenomena

    • @quantumsensechannel
      @quantumsensechannel  Год назад +3

      Hello! Thank you for watching.
      You are on the right track! If you watch episode two, you’ll see how the wavefunction comes about.
      And your second question is actually incredibly profound. I think what you’re asking is if quantum mechanics is inherently random before we measure things, or if that’s just some artifact of our mathematical model. I may one day make a video on this, but you can actually *prove* that quantum mechanics is inherently random! (If you assume that causality is a fact I.e. nothing travels faster than light) This is done through Bell inequalities, the experimental verification of which was the subject of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics.
      You call yourself ignorant, yet you are thinking about physics problems that have won the most recent Nobel Prize. So don’t worry about being “wrong”, physics is the art of being wrong, while having the passion to figure out *why* we are wrong.
      Hope you enjoy the rest of the series!
      -QuantumSense

    • @ToriKo_
      @ToriKo_ Год назад +2

      @@quantumsensechannel thank you so much for your measured, thoughtful response. I really enjoyed episode 2 as well! I would love to see the bell inequality video from you, I’ve watched other yt videos on the topic, but you seem to have a real knack for helping us see why, and agree with, the mathematical decisions that are being implicitly made along the way. ‘Ppreciate ya!

  • @maverick-rs
    @maverick-rs Год назад

    YO I LOVE THE 3B1B STYLEEE WE NEED THIS FOR LIKE EINSTEINS STUFF

  • @sythatsokmontrey8879
    @sythatsokmontrey8879 Год назад +2

    This is exactly what I need.

  • @adrienw4704
    @adrienw4704 Год назад

    thank you very much for making this series. you explain very well

  • @durandesther1506
    @durandesther1506 5 месяцев назад

    thank you for your video ! I started a course of quantum mechanics this morning and haven't understand nothing (the teacher did not help us in fact...) but know I know this channel, I am safe for the rest of the semester :)

  • @TekCroach
    @TekCroach Месяц назад

    Excellent! I really love your bold claims at the beginning of the video that you intuitively understand QM. I do not know why some (experts) claim they don't. You just have to throw away some of your old beliefs, and adopt new beliefs, and that's it. Thank you. :)

  • @miles6875
    @miles6875 Год назад +2

    You have a new subscriber in me. Great content 😊

  • @danielmortada3362
    @danielmortada3362 Год назад

    Excited !

  • @trigocuantico
    @trigocuantico Год назад +1

    good luck for the series

  • @tkansal
    @tkansal 5 месяцев назад

    very well done. i am on second video and watch and try to soak in all the videos. thanks again.

  • @andrejmajstorovic1437
    @andrejmajstorovic1437 Год назад

    you cant stop now, we want it all baby!

  • @Calisthenics_Noob
    @Calisthenics_Noob Год назад +1

    This is very good!

  • @ishaqktktech4372
    @ishaqktktech4372 Год назад +2

    The perfect teacher ever
    Love you from Pakistan

  • @TehDaddyShark
    @TehDaddyShark 10 месяцев назад

    Genuinely thank you for this ❤

  • @Luca-jy2rg
    @Luca-jy2rg 2 месяца назад

    The best quantum theory series!

  • @pandiest7764
    @pandiest7764 2 месяца назад

    i am starting my first semester at university at UCSC, and am looking forward to my physics major. thanks for uploading this playlist for me to look forward to viewing the first time, not knowing much of anything, so i can come back in the future and laugh at how much i didnt know.

  • @paulaborges7726
    @paulaborges7726 4 месяца назад

    That is incredible, thank you so much

  • @feynmanpoon1810
    @feynmanpoon1810 25 дней назад

    Great lecture, thank you!

  • @tanvirfarhan5585
    @tanvirfarhan5585 Год назад

    -- awesome series

  • @gideonwiersma2794
    @gideonwiersma2794 Год назад

    I am looking forward to also see videos about the topics covered in chapter 6 to 11 of Griffiths!

  • @haimbenavraham1502
    @haimbenavraham1502 Год назад

    Brilliant. To the point.

  • @rgudduu
    @rgudduu Год назад

    I see the amount of effort gone into making this high quality video.

  • @justanormalyoutubeuser3868
    @justanormalyoutubeuser3868 Год назад

    Love the mathematical explanation.

  • @physicsnabo
    @physicsnabo Год назад +2

    thank you ....keep going😃

  • @sergiolucas38
    @sergiolucas38 Год назад +1

    Good video, man :)

  • @bibek2599
    @bibek2599 Год назад

    Great explanation!

  • @evilotis01
    @evilotis01 Год назад +1

    this is SUPER helpful

  • @curtpiazza1688
    @curtpiazza1688 11 месяцев назад

    Great intro! Thanx! 🎉