To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available). --To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable. --To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video. --If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.
These physics principles are seemingly so simple, but yet sometimes so hard to grasp. Your videos present them in the most clear way possible. Excellent!
Great animation but it is impossible to make a measurement with 100 per cent certainty!!RE1: Heisenberg Uncertainty my Simple thought experiment :tell me one physical measurement that does not involve at least one photon
@@EugeneKhutoryansky in the minute 2:21 i didn't understand if we measure the z components of spining or you mean that the electron spins along z-axis
@@EugeneKhutoryansky man, of course its all probability and i find it funny ITS ALL PROBABILITY BECAUSE WE CANT CREATE A PROPER DETECTOR the others detectors will change the movement of the spin because they are interfearing
i love all your videos, and the great music at the background, are you going to make more animation about electrical engineering, especially in electronics part?
I'm just commenting to give the youtube algorithm something to bite on when the person is looking for electron movement and its visualization in a 3D - Enviroment. love the vid keep it up
Thanks Eugene. Even though my job has nothing to do with Physics, I really enjoy watching your videos and get a better understanding of the amazing world around us.
OMG thank you SO MUCH!!! I've seen tons of videos, read tons of articles, researched every possible thing about spin, and THIS is the first one that actually made me understand it finally!
Always a good day when I see a new physics video from you. Keep up the great work! I know I'll be watching a lot more of you in the upcoming months as I review for the GRE.
I’m no physics student, but I still find this kind of stuff to be fascinating. Unfortunately, for the layman like me, it’s hard to find scientific explanations for things that aren’t either way above my level or ridiculously simplified. This seems to be a perfect middle ground, and has excellent visuals! This helped me understand spin better than any other source I tried looking at. Thank you and have a great day!
I've just come across your videos for the first time today. Your animations are superb - in fact the best I've seen. I lecture in these topics myself and I will certainly be directing students to your wonderful visualizations. I've also viewed your video on entanglement and can't wait to see the rest of your brilliant and clear explanations.
Man, more people who make videos like yours need to get whatever program you use for the animations. Nice visuals. They are a work of art in themselves.
Definitely the best visuals I've ever seen for a science video on youtube. Still don't fully understand the concept but pretty sure thats just cause this concept, like most quantum mechanical concepts, is abstract af.
I am a physicist and I wished every student of physics was exposed to these animations to bring some clarity to some rather difficult to understand subjects, or simply subjects that required large infrastructure knowledge, excellent!!
You are without a doubt one of the most underrated RUclipsrs of all time! You could explain and simulate anything to any academic level while making it fun! I appreciate literally every video that you put out and I hope you keep making more. It is unfortunate that RUclips's algorithms don't give enough to content creators like you and favor duller, more mundane RUclipsrs like video game players and vloggers. I don't understand how people can pass over such amazing content such as yours. Forever a fan!
I love these videos. Thank you for making them. One suggestion: explain entanglement first and then offer observation as a special case of entanglement. Newcomers often get an inflated sense of ego when we first describe the effect of observation and then spend only a little time talking about entanglement. Measurement is entanglement.
As in the Double Slit Experiment i have to presume that the act of measuring anything like the position of an electron or the spin of an electron changes the condition of the propertie of the electron. By measuring the property, we force the electron to assume a condition. The fact that we measure the condition Spin Up the first time and Spin Down later on (after measuring it in a different direction) kinda proofs that we alter the property (read: force it to assume one of the possible conditions that we propose).... Although that's how far my understanding goes at this given point. Feel free to point out mistakes in my train of thought!
Thank you Eugene, your videos are incredible! Do I understand correctly that once we perform the measurement, the cubit collapses on the always on *z-axis* to 1 or 0 ? (and x and y axis are there just to represent from which point on the sphere it could have been while in super position, before collapsing).
You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link: ruclips.net/user/timedtext_video?ref=share&v=3k5IWlVdMbo You will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit button for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately. Details about adding translations is available at support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en Thanks.
Here is a question for you: We assume that quantum mechanics is this spooky undefinable world where we can know the position of an particle or its velocity but never both. The example you show us emphasis that even more. You can only ever know the spin of an electron in one direction on the 3d axis and never more than one at a time. Furthermore we note the very weird quality of quantum physics where the state of a particle appears dependent on whether we measure it. The classic is the splitting of a photon through to holes where when we don't measure it the light shows as a wave but when we do we get a single point and the average of those points appears in the lines highlighted in that wave. In your example once we measure the spin of a particle in a direction the particle randomly changes in the other two. In both case you show the obvious nature of quantum theory where things show up as probabilities. We can't show where the particle is only where it could possibly be. The average of those events over time will reflect those probabilities very closely. The assumption is that particles can be in two places at a time and have several values or may be in several dimensions we don't see but there is never an exact finding in the universe we can see that can exist. My question is how do we know that assumption is true? My conjecture is that when we analyze how we detect the particles and forces of our world we only can sense things using the electromagnetic force of nature. While we can detect the effects of the strong or weak force in accelerators or feel the force of gravity we do not use the strong, weak or gravimetric forces to detect these things. The particles show off in accelerators are shown via photons which are carriers of the electromagnetic force. When we feel gravity we feel the push back on the atoms in our cells from the electromagnetic fields of the electromagnetic fields of the objects we are in contact with. It seem safe to conclude that all our information regarding the universe is filtered through the electromagnetic force. We can deduce an awful lot about the other three by what we can detect but is there not information we cannot perceive due to this filter. Effects within the other three forces that don't transfer to the electromagnetic spectrum in meaningful ways. Could it be that the uncertainty is not actually the fuzziness of the quantum states but the fact that the only way we have to detect changes, electromagnetic forces, by their nature must interact with the elements we are trying to observe. This would explain why we get particles when we measure which hole the photon went througn and waves when we don't The states are not the same. In one we affect the expierment through our attempt to observe and in the other we do not. This also explains why the act of measuring the other axis of electron spin means we lose information regarding the other axis. It is not that observation changes things but rather we are interacting with that electron to measure it which means we by default affect its state. Why do we assume that it is a spooky undefinable nature of quantum mechanics and not a flaw in the only way we can observe the quantum world.? I have no clue what the answer to that question is?
You put it well. The act of observation is an act of interaction and therefore results in entanglement of states and an alteration in the inherent state of a quantum particle.
I never thought I would feel this much stress and suspense in a seemingly boring physics video. But god was I wrong. Tension was at the peak when it was revealed how supernatural electron spin is my detecting their directions with the detectors. The music doubled the excitement.
I’ve been struggling to understand this principle in relation to fundamental particles. But this made it make so much sense. I really wish there was a way to have more of these types of animations demonstrated in classes.
Wonderful.... especially the way the imaginary axes are explained is amazing... Nice imagination to understand quantum physics... Plz do cover other aspects of science too...:)
since i think electrons also act like a wave is the "spin" similar to a frequency of sorts if we think of the electron as a wave? ya did a great job eugy but wrapping my mind around this one is rough
My confusion about spin has always been that we can make a measurement of spin, but relative to what? I thought it was probably relative to the motion of the particle. But now in this video, it seems like it is relative to absolute physical space. So if that is the case, it would imply that electrons are like miniature gyroscopes, and an isolated electron on Earth would reverse its spin in the up/down direction every 12 hours (when measured relative to the Earth's surface). In fact, we should be able to replicate Foucault's pendulum experiment using electron spin.
Amazing video as always! When the quantum state collapses to a 100% of one direction, let's say in this example Up, there seems to be two quantum states that both, when magnitudes squared, will give 1 as the probability. So in this visualization, there seems to be a |Up> and -|Up> state (its negative) both of which, when measured, will give the same result. If a state collapses into the physical "Up direction" state, is there a way of knowing about whether the quantum state collapsed into the positive |Up> state or the negative one? Or is there even any physical difference to these two states? A further question: for each physical direction, are there only two quantum states that correcpond to measuring that direction with 100% probability (positive and negative), or is there an infinite amount of them, with all possible complex phases? For example, are all of the following quantum states valid, all resulting a 100% probability of measuring spin in the Up direction: |Up> -|Up> i * |Up> -i * |Up> (1/sqrt(2) + i/sqrt(2) ) * |Up> etc.. And if so, is there any actual, physical differences to all of these options?
what if you tried to measure the spin of the particle in two different directions at the exact same time, without any nano or pictosecond [ was that what it s called? ] or anything smaller between the two measurements? or what if we were able to directly look at these particles individually?
Need a sequel to this video where you visualize and solve a problem using these matrices and eigenvectors... That would be very helpful. Also a video on how pauli matrices were conceived. For most of us these matrices are just something to be accepted as is...with no idea how they came into being
thank you for the great video! i love the first song. how is the spin measured? does the electron have to interact during measurement? what is an electron and why does it spin? how does one even know that it spins? is the word "spin" meant in the typical "i'm turning around" matter or is it only a metaphorical name for something abstract? why can one assume that the propability of the not measured spin axis correlates with the mathematical model only because the propability of the measured spin axis correlates?
1. spin is measured by applying a magnetic field. 2. measurement is an interaction. so, yes. 3. electron is a fundamental particle that carries the charge. why does it spins? why does it carries a charge? it does. 4. we know by applying a magnetic field. "spin" creates an intrinsic magnetic moment. magnetic fields exert a force and induce a charge that we can measure. 5. spin doesn't mean that it spins around. "spin" is an intrinsic property, just like charge or mass, not a rotation. But the spin does cause a magnetic moment, just like a rotating charge. And it's angular momentum, just like a spinning ball. But the electron is not spinning. An electron is even not made of anything and is suppose to be a point and not a sphere. What is spin? An intrinsic angular momentum of a particle. It's a degree of freedom a particle can have. Two electrons can occupy the same space if they differ in their spin: -1/2 and +1/2.
Excellent video! - Can you say that spins have 2 by 2 eigentensors instead of eigenvectors? So the spin X matrix, spin Y matrix, and spin Z matrix are the basis states of a spin and their normalized linear combination can characterize any possible spin state (if we talk about only a single spin).
Наука
![Finesse2Tymes FT Youngboy - Traumatized [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/PV8BIX1mYBM/mqdefault.jpg)
To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available).
--To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable.
--To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video.
--If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.
Very informative. Thanks for sharing, Lord-Jesus-Christ com
i know it's kinda randomly asking but do anyone know a good website to stream newly released tv shows online ?
@Dwayne Trace Flixportal :D
@Milan Ahmad thank you, signed up and it seems like they got a lot of movies there =) Appreciate it!!
@Dwayne Trace Glad I could help xD
These physics principles are seemingly so simple, but yet sometimes so hard to grasp. Your videos present them in the most clear way possible. Excellent!
Thanks for the compliment about my videos.
Great animation but it is impossible to make a measurement with 100 per cent certainty!!RE1: Heisenberg Uncertainty my Simple thought experiment :tell me one physical measurement that does not involve at least one photon
@@EugeneKhutoryansky in the minute 2:21 i didn't understand if we measure the z components of spining or you mean that the electron spins along z-axis
@@EugeneKhutoryansky man, of course its all probability and i find it funny
ITS ALL PROBABILITY BECAUSE WE CANT CREATE A PROPER DETECTOR the others detectors will change the movement of the spin because they are interfearing
thank for visualizing this hard-inmaginating concept
You are welcome and thanks.
i love all your videos, and the great music at the background, are you going to make more animation about electrical engineering, especially in electronics part?
Qais, yes I will be making more animations on electrical engineering. Thanks.
I'm just commenting to give the youtube algorithm something to bite on when the person is looking for electron movement and its visualization in a 3D - Enviroment.
love the vid keep it up
Thank you for your service.
Your visualisations are absolutely eugenious!
Keep up the good work. :)
Thanks for the compliment.
Thanks Eugene. Even though my job has nothing to do with Physics, I really enjoy watching your videos and get a better understanding of the amazing world around us.
Thanks. I am glad you enjoy my videos.
OMG thank you SO MUCH!!! I've seen tons of videos, read tons of articles, researched every possible thing about spin, and THIS is the first one that actually made me understand it finally!
Glad my video was helpful. Thanks.
Always a good day when I see a new physics video from you. Keep up the great work! I know I'll be watching a lot more of you in the upcoming months as I review for the GRE.
Thanks. I am glad you like my videos, and good luck with the GRE.
keep up the good work! I love how you give the concepts enough time to sink in - very helpful
Thanks.
I’m no physics student, but I still find this kind of stuff to be fascinating. Unfortunately, for the layman like me, it’s hard to find scientific explanations for things that aren’t either way above my level or ridiculously simplified. This seems to be a perfect middle ground, and has excellent visuals! This helped me understand spin better than any other source I tried looking at. Thank you and have a great day!
Right? Even in college they tried to teach us indeterminacy and it went right over my head. They should've just played us this video instead 😭
I've just come across your videos for the first time today. Your animations are superb - in fact the best I've seen. I lecture in these topics myself and I will certainly be directing students to your wonderful visualizations. I've also viewed your video on entanglement and can't wait to see the rest of your brilliant and clear explanations.
Thanks for the compliment. I am glad you like my videos and I hope your students will like them too.
I thought spin isn't spin at all it's just an intrinsic character of the particle 🙄
@@alenlukoselukose5662 thought isn't thought
If you like this video, you can help more people find it in their RUclips search engine by clicking the like button, and writing a comment. Thanks.
This channel will be in the millions in a few months.
Thanks Eugene.
I just love you for doing this hard work. Thanks!
Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky
godsadog
"or in any other direction" had me ducked the duck up 🦆
Amazing visual aids and explanations. Flawless delivery as usual, I'm addicted to all these videos.
Thanks for the compliment.
I must say, this is absolutely brilliant. Well done.
Thanks for the compliment.
I feel really really lucky to came by this channel.the way you visualized this...is just great!
Thanks.
Man, more people who make videos like yours need to get whatever program you use for the animations. Nice visuals. They are a work of art in themselves.
Unfortunately, there aren't any more people like him.
incredible videos man, the visualisations and slow paced explanations really help in understanding these abstract concepts
Thanks for the compliment about my videos.
The best series of educational videos I have ever seen in youtube! Excellent!
Thanks for the compliment about my videos.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky
You are very welcome!
Definitely the best visuals I've ever seen for a science video on youtube. Still don't fully understand the concept but pretty sure thats just cause this concept, like most quantum mechanical concepts, is abstract af.
Electrons playing a sick joke on the observers. DAMN YOU!
I could not help thinking that the electron's behavior maximizes frustration.
Your visualisations are masterful!
As usual, brilliant exposition and animation. Should be a must-watch for all physics students starting QM.
Thanks for the compliments.
I've just discovered your videos. They are awesome, thank you very much.
I am glad you like my videos. Thanks.
I am a physicist and I wished every student of physics was exposed to these animations to bring some clarity to some rather difficult to understand subjects, or simply subjects that required large infrastructure knowledge, excellent!!
Thanks for the compliment about my animations.
You are without a doubt one of the most underrated RUclipsrs of all time! You could explain and simulate anything to any academic level while making it fun! I appreciate literally every video that you put out and I hope you keep making more.
It is unfortunate that RUclips's algorithms don't give enough to content creators like you and favor duller, more mundane RUclipsrs like video game players and vloggers. I don't understand how people can pass over such amazing content such as yours. Forever a fan!
Whenever I start making more money I will most definitely subscribe to your Patreon, you have my promise. (As long as you keep making videos ☺ )
Thanks. I really appreciate the support, and I am glad that you like my videos.
I love these videos. Thank you for making them. One suggestion: explain entanglement first and then offer observation as a special case of entanglement. Newcomers often get an inflated sense of ego when we first describe the effect of observation and then spend only a little time talking about entanglement. Measurement is entanglement.
Entanglement, Spin
ruclips.net/video/nnkvoIHztPw/видео.html
These videos are hypnotically watchable and also fantastically useful for people like me who need to visualise to understand. Thank you.
Thanks. I am glad you like my videos.
Just got done reading about this aspect of quantum mechanics. This video helped a lot in clearing things up
As in the Double Slit Experiment i have to presume that the act of measuring anything like the position of an electron or the spin of an electron changes the condition of the propertie of the electron. By measuring the property, we force the electron to assume a condition. The fact that we measure the condition Spin Up the first time and Spin Down later on (after measuring it in a different direction) kinda proofs that we alter the property (read: force it to assume one of the possible conditions that we propose).... Although that's how far my understanding goes at this given point. Feel free to point out mistakes in my train of thought!
Great animations and explanations. Thank you
Thanks for the compliment about my animations and my explanations.
Very very easy explanation of the quantum spin. Thanks for making this video.
Glad you liked my explanation. Thanks.
8:40 quantum spin states. Excellent explanation.
Excellent video Mr. Khutoryansky! You are a hero!
Thanks. Glad you liked my video.
Thank you Eugene, your videos are incredible! Do I understand correctly that once we perform the measurement, the cubit collapses on the always on *z-axis* to 1 or 0 ? (and x and y axis are there just to represent from which point on the sphere it could have been while in super position, before collapsing).
This video is so usefull to visualize quantum-mechanical spin! Please do not stop making videos and really thank you for your help! :)
Thanks. More videos are on their way.
This is a really good video to join up with the MIT lectures on quantum physics here on RUclips.
Magnificent! No more mentally struggling to create this imagery :-) Thank you!
Thanks.
Thanks for the effort to explain this by a video!
You are welcome and thanks.
Brilliant! I can not imagine a better introductory description.
Thanks for the compliment.
months ago i ask u to make a video on this topic of quantum spin. m glad to see the best explanation on spin on youtube:)
Thanks. :)
Thanks for this video and the larger series!
Thanks.
thanks for all of your videos.
Bestest explanation of such a hard imaginative topic ......God Bless you .
Thank for the compliment.
this is the first video to simplify the calculations thank you and well done!
Thanks.
Thank you so much. Just used a Bell-Basis in my bachelor thesis and couldn't imagine the whole story behind it. Got it now :)
Glad to hear my video was helpful.
Amazed and loved the work just awesome. Keep it up (Y).
Thanks.
You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link:
ruclips.net/user/timedtext_video?ref=share&v=3k5IWlVdMbo
You will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit button for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately.
Details about adding translations is available at
support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en
Thanks.
Please make videoes on spectroscopy, condensed matter physics and cosmology.
Bcoz i only understand through your videos.
I thought your videos were wonderful before, but improving the accessibility of them this way makes them even better! Cheers!
Another amazing video. Keep it up! Great Channel
Thanks. Glad you liked it.
Amazing visualizations, helped me a lot!
Thanks. Glad my video was helpful.
Brilliant presentation ! thanks Eugene!
Thanks for the compliment.
This helped me ALOT! Thank you so much for doing this video! Forever thankfull!
I am glad my video was helpful. Thanks.
Pure Perfection …
Great that videos like this exist!
Well Done Eugene! Godspeed!!!
To Infinity & Beyond …°°∆^°
Thanks. I am glad you like my videos.
Thank you,the rest of the animation of education is good and all but yours describes and informs me wonderful.
Thanks.
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky your welcome
This is just love. Keep up the good work.
Thanks. I am glad you like my videos.
Your videos are awesome, thank you
Thanks. I am glad you like my videos.
Here is a question for you:
We assume that quantum mechanics is this spooky undefinable world where we can know the position of an particle or its velocity but never both. The example you show us emphasis that even more. You can only ever know the spin of an electron in one direction on the 3d axis and never more than one at a time.
Furthermore we note the very weird quality of quantum physics where the state of a particle appears dependent on whether we measure it. The classic is the splitting of a photon through to holes where when we don't measure it the light shows as a wave but when we do we get a single point and the average of those points appears in the lines highlighted in that wave. In your example once we measure the spin of a particle in a direction the particle randomly changes in the other two.
In both case you show the obvious nature of quantum theory where things show up as probabilities. We can't show where the particle is only where it could possibly be. The average of those events over time will reflect those probabilities very closely.
The assumption is that particles can be in two places at a time and have several values or may be in several dimensions we don't see but there is never an exact finding in the universe we can see that can exist.
My question is how do we know that assumption is true?
My conjecture is that when we analyze how we detect the particles and forces of our world we only can sense things using the electromagnetic force of nature. While we can detect the effects of the strong or weak force in accelerators or feel the force of gravity we do not use the strong, weak or gravimetric forces to detect these things. The particles show off in accelerators are shown via photons which are carriers of the electromagnetic force. When we feel gravity we feel the push back on the atoms in our cells from the electromagnetic fields of the electromagnetic fields of the objects we are in contact with.
It seem safe to conclude that all our information regarding the universe is filtered through the electromagnetic force. We can deduce an awful lot about the other three by what we can detect but is there not information we cannot perceive due to this filter. Effects within the other three forces that don't transfer to the electromagnetic spectrum in meaningful ways.
Could it be that the uncertainty is not actually the fuzziness of the quantum states but the fact that the only way we have to detect changes, electromagnetic forces, by their nature must interact with the elements we are trying to observe. This would explain why we get particles when we measure which hole the photon went througn and waves when we don't The states are not the same. In one we affect the expierment through our attempt to observe and in the other we do not. This also explains why the act of measuring the other axis of electron spin means we lose information regarding the other axis. It is not that observation changes things but rather we are interacting with that electron to measure it which means we by default affect its state.
Why do we assume that it is a spooky undefinable nature of quantum mechanics and not a flaw in the only way we can observe the quantum world.? I have no clue what the answer to that question is?
So you are asking we are limited to see by the very kind of measurement people apply on particles on a small scale?
You put it well. The act of observation is an act of interaction and therefore results in entanglement of states and an alteration in the inherent state of a quantum particle.
Excellent video as always!
Glad you liked it. Thanks.
I never thought I would feel this much stress and suspense in a seemingly boring physics video. But god was I wrong. Tension was at the peak when it was revealed how supernatural electron spin is my detecting their directions with the detectors. The music doubled the excitement.
amazing video. You won't find an explanation more clear than this anywhere
Thanks for the compliment about my video.
you're an absolute legend i finally understood what spin looks like and why imaginary numbers are needed
Thanks!
Sir...I have no words to thank You sir...May GOD bless You...
Thanks for the compliments.
This really helps, thanks very much
I’ve been struggling to understand this principle in relation to fundamental particles.
But this made it make so much sense. I really wish there was a way to have more of these types of animations demonstrated in classes.
Glad my video was helpful.
Spin of Indivisible Particle :
ruclips.net/video/nnkvoIHztPw/видео.html
This video is misleading. I hope you researched a bit more and didn't take everything from this video for how electron particles actually behave
thanks for these wonderful videos.
You are welcome and thanks.
best explanation by far of spin
Thanks for the compliment.
Awesome as always!
Thanks. Glad you liked it.
Wonderful.... especially the way the imaginary axes are explained is amazing... Nice imagination to understand quantum physics... Plz do cover other aspects of science too...:)
thanks so much Eugene
thanks for making this easier to understand
Absolutely brilliant explanation!
Thanks.
Please do a video on Turing machines and computability! I loved this, as always
love this channel
Thanks. I am glad you like my videos.
Your videos are most intuitive. Thanks. Could you make a video on gauge theory and gauge fixing type things
Thanks. Gauge theory is on my list of topics for future videos.
amazing !!!!! thank you for this
Thanks. Glad you liked my video.
Thanks again for such a great video😀
Thanks.
Very good! Your videos are very good as always. Congratulations!
Thanks. I am glad that you like my videos.
Brilliant visualization.
That's how Gyro's steel ball works lol
since i think electrons also act like a wave is the "spin" similar to a frequency of sorts if we think of the electron as a wave? ya did a great job eugy but wrapping my mind around this one is rough
Could u do a video about the nature of vacuum? Thx for sharing those excelent videos!
This is absolutely fascinating
Spin of Indivisible Particle :
ruclips.net/video/nnkvoIHztPw/видео.html
Very nice piece of work!
Thanks for the compliment.
Thank you!!!
Amazing.
My confusion about spin has always been that we can make a measurement of spin, but relative to what? I thought it was probably relative to the motion of the particle. But now in this video, it seems like it is relative to absolute physical space. So if that is the case, it would imply that electrons are like miniature gyroscopes, and an isolated electron on Earth would reverse its spin in the up/down direction every 12 hours (when measured relative to the Earth's surface). In fact, we should be able to replicate Foucault's pendulum experiment using electron spin.
really suberb animation and explanation.... hatts off to your efforts....
Thanks.
MIND BLOWN
We are very thankful to you
Thanks.
This is a great video, especially for beginners in Physics!
Thanks.
Great analogy and explication! 🇧🇷
Thanks.
Very nice explanation.
thanks for such wonderful videos. Really appreciate your efforts.
God Bless you.
Thanks.
Amazing video as always!
When the quantum state collapses to a 100% of one direction, let's say in this example Up, there seems to be two quantum states that both, when magnitudes squared, will give 1 as the probability. So in this visualization, there seems to be a |Up> and -|Up> state (its negative) both of which, when measured, will give the same result. If a state collapses into the physical "Up direction" state, is there a way of knowing about whether the quantum state collapsed into the positive |Up> state or the negative one? Or is there even any physical difference to these two states?
A further question: for each physical direction, are there only two quantum states that correcpond to measuring that direction with 100% probability (positive and negative), or is there an infinite amount of them, with all possible complex phases? For example, are all of the following quantum states valid, all resulting a 100% probability of measuring spin in the Up direction:
|Up>
-|Up>
i * |Up>
-i * |Up>
(1/sqrt(2) + i/sqrt(2) ) * |Up>
etc..
And if so, is there any actual, physical differences to all of these options?
what if you tried to measure the spin of the particle in two different directions at the exact same time, without any nano or pictosecond [ was that what it s called? ] or anything smaller between the two measurements? or what if we were able to directly look at these particles individually?
With one hundred percent certainty: this is an amazing vedio...
Thanks.
Need a sequel to this video where you visualize and solve a problem using these matrices and eigenvectors... That would be very helpful.
Also a video on how pauli matrices were conceived. For most of us these matrices are just something to be accepted as is...with no idea how they came into being
Thanks a Lot for the video
thank you for the great video! i love the first song.
how is the spin measured?
does the electron have to interact during measurement?
what is an electron and why does it spin?
how does one even know that it spins?
is the word "spin" meant in the typical "i'm turning around" matter or is it only a metaphorical name for something abstract?
why can one assume that the propability of the not measured spin axis correlates with the mathematical model only because the propability of the measured spin axis correlates?
1. spin is measured by applying a magnetic field.
2. measurement is an interaction. so, yes.
3. electron is a fundamental particle that carries the charge. why does it spins? why does it carries a charge? it does.
4. we know by applying a magnetic field. "spin" creates an intrinsic magnetic moment. magnetic fields exert a force and induce a charge that we can measure.
5. spin doesn't mean that it spins around. "spin" is an intrinsic property, just like charge or mass, not a rotation. But the spin does cause a magnetic moment, just like a rotating charge. And it's angular momentum, just like a spinning ball. But the electron is not spinning. An electron is even not made of anything and is suppose to be a point and not a sphere.
What is spin? An intrinsic angular momentum of a particle. It's a degree of freedom a particle can have. Two electrons can occupy the same space if they differ in their spin: -1/2 and +1/2.
The best explanation ever. Thanks
Thanks for the compliment.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky what software do you use for such animation ? AutoCAD sure not, Maya, Houdini ? or more simple ?
I make my 3D animations with "Poser."
@@EugeneKhutoryansky WoW thanks, it is much easier than Houdini. Interesant.
Excellent video! - Can you say that spins have 2 by 2 eigentensors instead of eigenvectors? So the spin X matrix, spin Y matrix, and spin Z matrix are the basis states of a spin and their normalized linear combination can characterize any possible spin state (if we talk about only a single spin).