We shouldn’t care more about a dress than human lives but this made news at one point and people still talk about it… but no fck the starving, sick, struggling and unwell to keep up with this cheap family
THANK YOU i was looking for this comment - looks hideous now like some torn rags not like the beautiful siren like way it looked on a thin model vs a curvy one - not every gown is made for a curvy figure and there’s nothing wrong with that it’s just a piece of art not something sold to the masses
@@staceyvitale So they are also responsible for not getting licensed to hold on historical pieces. Their workers probably didn't even know the damage that wearing it could do, they weren't trained. You can see it by the videos where they're wearing gloves to hold the dress, even if fashion historians say it's best to hold it with your hands to do less damage. Non licensed institutions shouldn't have such pieces in the first place
It was *NOT* the Smithsonian who cares for that dress. If it were it would have never been allowed out of the museum. It's Ripleys belive it or not who does
@@crimberliesthe designer literally made Marilyn's dress according to Marilyn's body shape and size. It wasn't made to be worn by anyone else 🫤 Edit: MOM IM FAMOUS
@@sireniral9003 i’m just trying to understand, she wanted her goods and belongings to be destroyed and buried with her ? or was it specifically against other women so they don’t enjoy her stuff after she died ? aren’t both ways narcissistic a little bit anyway .. ?
Yeah, renting it when you had a perfect replica to fit you is incredibly disrespectful. She knew it wouldn’t fit. They both have very distinct figures but they don’t match. The oyster dress? Meh. She owns it AND there’s a better kept replica in the MOMA.
@@meowwww_06 well i disagree with this statement Just because you can afford something doesn't mean you can do that 😮💨 Especially ruined historical dresses
When you have the money to buy on, then you can talk she bought it, and she can do what she wants with it. You're just a person you could die for. All she cares about is not making a difference. You can't do anything about it, so let it go. It's not a big deal. Mm is dead, and her dress is fine. It's not like she can do anything about it either so stfu
@@casper3791 that of which she can do because she legally owns the dress. If an expensive beautiful dress that I owned didn’t fit me I’d alter it too, wouldn’t you?
@@bizarrekimten it's not the issue that she altered it to fit her it's the issue that she's altering extremely beautiful dresses that have been worn by incredibly known people and iconic dresses that they've worn or created. Therefore ruining the beauty behind the dresses if you don't agree you don't have to but that is my opinion and you don't have to like it
The Monroe dress was owned by Ripleys Believe it or Not after winning it in an auction and lent to Kim K after Kris called to complain. The worlds of collecting, selling, donating, and displaying art are so vast and complex with their own politics within each world. Unfortunately things of value gets lost throughout time due to lack of care or education, lack of finance and individual selfish agendas
@@maddylee5607 So Ripley's, Instead of standing their ground and tell Chris *WHY* Kim can't wear it, gave into the pressure. I pray that gown went to the hands of a skilled restoration person who can source the same crystal beads from that era, and can reinforce the seams that was stressed using conservator's techniques similar on how they reinforce Queen Victoria's gowns for display. (edit: Fix of Queen Victoria's name. Victorian? really?)
Yet ARTIFACTS need to be cherished! U act like it's something that they can just throw away and isn't an iconic piece of beauty. Oh sure yea let's just ruin authentic art because u know fuck everyone's dreams and hard work that they put their soul into.
They can’t do anything about it after all she got the money and people are doing their job but none of them have respect, she has no respect as he buys and ruins the dresses and neither do the ones who gave her the dress and support her despite damaging such historical and meaningful pieces
Nobody should be allowed to have these iconic dresses! Museum was stupid to allow KK to even wear Marilyn’s dress!!! That was one of a kind- she destroyed it! I don’t care how much $$ they paid to “ borrow” or buy that Oyster dress😮Hate me if you like - I could care less! RIP Marilyn ❤👵
Honestly, she’s an icon. She surpassed Paris Hilton, became one of the biggest names in fashion, and she looks good asf in those dresses. She forever changed the way people see them and that’s fucking iconic.
Calm down it's just a dress it's supposed to be worn There are even 2 of them so one of them is just a copy. It's the design that makes it unique and the brand can make several more it's not like a piece of art made with the artist own hands that can never be reproduced dine his dead, the seamstress that made this 2 could make a few more but then they wouldn't be exclusive and worth so much.
Well, she was made an exact replica of the monroe dress that fit her, but she still wore the original. I dont think a replica wouldve worked, unfortunately
@@libelinhaa2079 YEA BUT VERY VALUABLE AND THE ONLY ONES IN THE WORLD ARE MORE LIKE PIECES OF ART, think of it as Mona Lisa, it's the only one and original in the world Same with starry night And other very valuable artwork, like statues etc!
@@kr1s.p_alt there are 2 actually and it's not exactly like that because fabric will not last has long has a painting even when not exposed to sunlight and protected from other elements. Also you can't restore it like a painting and even those can and have been destroyed by bad restoration jobs. Btw people can read fine without caps lock 😂
It’s honestly gross. She destroyed the Marilyn Monroe dress and and then altered another incredibly famous dress. The fact she thinks she has the right to do this is shocking to me
Lol. I know what you mean but there's reallly no need to run. For once, people just need to kindly but firmly use the word "NO" with Kim! It's that simple.
I mean why are people selling these "timeless peices of art" to her? This one honestly i dont understand the significance. It was made by a designer and theres just 2. Thats its. Its rare sure but in the end its art thats meant to be worn. She had it altered to fit her its not destroyed
What am I missing here???!!! People are mad because she altered her own property?? Really?? I can imagine, maybe that was the thought behind putting the other on display in a museum.. so that people could admire it as a piece of art.
I guess because it's such a timeless one of kind piece you wear it as it is you don't go alter it like it's just a random dress you just bought, maybe she should've made a replica her size bcs that dress took hours and hardwork to make and it's of great value, to just take/add pieces and modify it like that this is what I assume most people are referring which I partly agree with too but idk
Its not even about kim anymore. If theres only 2 of these dresses and they're as histotic and precious as made out to be.. then they shouldn't be sold.
Its absolutely about kims nasty ass! She comes and waves her checkbook to these museums and borrows these iconic dresses because shes so lame and boring that cant stand out on her own. Why is kim even relevant these days? Because she has money!
I think she feels extremely special when she wears these dresses no one else can, that's why she is willing to destroy these pieces of history, just to feed her own ego and self-importance.
She thinks of herself too highly there was this podcast in which Kanye says that Kim is modern day marilyn. Kim is absolutely vain yeah she’s a billionaire and really made her way but her attitude is horrible
Kim is becoming irrelevant so she wore M Monroe’s dress for clout and she destroyed it. Then she purchased and wore the Alexander M dress this only caused people to dislike her, for example the most iconic person in fashion…Anna Wintor. Kim’s MET GALA invitation should be revoked.
Not to Borrow is absolutely correct. Let them sell the piece. But they should not lend out museum pieces! Isn't that what a museum is for - preservation? Not ruination?
does she have the rights to do whatever she wants with the dress once she has bought it? yes. Should she have been able to buy it in the first place? hell na
@@capsnerd Why would you buy a dress to alter it mayorly if you have more then enough money to have that exact design outcome made on personalized size etc by any team of designers. It would similair to me Painting a Japanese anime girl on the Nachtwacht from Van Gogh if I would be able to pay for the said painting
Hell, if I had the money to afford that, you better believe I’m squeezing myself into that dress. Life is too short to be wondering about what makes other people angry
its not her fault? she literally bought them, like what part of buying something and then WEARING it is wrong? it should be blamed on the money hungry sellers that sold such important pieces. they shouldve been kept and preserved, why were they even auctioned in the first place? i dont blame kim, shes literally just buying what she wants. if i had the money id buy marilyns dress too?? 🤷🤷
Why cant she just have a replica made instead of destroying iconic art pieces? You wouldn't buy the Mona Lisa and have someone paint your face over hers. Her narcissism is insane
Narcissists usually don’t care enough about art to do something like that. Preserving a piece of art would mean that they wouldn’t be able to rub it in everyone’s faces how filthy rich they are.
But people especially us,girls would make fun of her. Sure not everyone but MANY would! Don’t people try to find issues w/popular people? So, people would call her cheap and lame😐😓
Yes, be upset with your first world problems. It's not like there's people out there who are still dying from tuberculosis and curable diseases. But yeah you put your foot down over us a piece of cloth. It's the under the world.
She bought the dress and altered it to fit her. While some people want couture to be purely for art purposes, others like the aspect that it is a wearable art, so they will wear it.
PEOPLE It’s not about the clothes, it’s about the disrespect for the original artist. It’s like buying a famous painting to paint over it. Some clothes aren’t actually meant to be worn, some are specifically designed to be art pieces. And yea, Marilyn didn’t want anyone else to wear that dress, so we should respect her wishes. It was her property, and she should be able to control what happens to it.
If she didn't want it worn she should've put it on her will. Not being an asshole but being legit. Most famous people have wills early for these types of things
That dress was an artifact from another dead celebrity. Buying it and altering it to the point of no return is morally wrong. That’s why people are mad
It's like buying a painting (lets say Monets Haystacks) and then painting over it to make it match the aesthetic of your house. You simply don't do that.
@@pieiero3006it's true that you can do whatever to the things you own. But you should know there were lots of masterpiece was ruined before they can reach the museum. The museum can't "protect" the arts if their current owner doesn't sell them or donate them to the museum.
If you own it do what you want. What you simply don't do is tell others what to do And also, it's not like that at all. The owner of the dress wanted her to wear it. You don't get a say. Get over it
Okay maybe I'm wrong here but wouldn't that be plagiarism? Art theft? Like with this newest piece, idk how the designer would have felt about her knocking it off and then wearing it on the red carpet. I grasp the issue here, I'm just saying that idk if art theft is really the answer? Especially as a celebrity who can afford originals
@@gull6037 ? Why though. It’s a historical piece, an important piece of artwork in the history of art. It’s a moral issue I guess and some of us understand the importance of preserving and respecting that history.
@@noladelrusso7614I'm a fan of Marilyn Monroe, and knew of the Diamond Dress. I grew up watching her old films and singing her old songs. I even have a blue dress similar to that in Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (mine is much easier to walk in...lol). Many of her styles were used by dollmakers - Barbie being one - Bob Mackie has multiple limited editions with Barbie. If you look at the Jem and the Holograms line, there were many influences in colour palette, and designs. The Oyster dress is horrendously ugly. I know that McQueen "pushed boundaries" of fashion, but it's inelegant despite the meaning of it being a "female warrior emerging from beneath the battered shell". I also fail to see why no-one has mentioned the first owner, Angie Barrett, who wore the dress to The (Beaux) Art Ball at Cannes FF in 2003. Despite not being a fan of the Kardashians, WHY is everyone obsessing over a dress from the 2020 oscars? At the Met Gala, KK changed into the gown in a dressing room at the bottom of the steps, and then into a replica of the Diamond dress for the remainder of the event.
She did not wear the dress from the Smithsonian, the one she tried to wear is from Ripley's Orlando ( couldnt get it over her hips) after making a charitable donation and she wore a replica in the end.
Her exhusband had bought this one for her as a gift. People are allowed to wear their own clothes. Many people wear and alter vintage clothes. Though she did not own the Marilyn Monroe dress, it was archived, thats why it's so sad it was harmed.
Exactly! Like, yeah Kim is acting hella weird by ruining massive pieces of recent history, but who the hell is selling these things to her or the person who bought these things for her, like… they’re enabling them to pull these sort of stunts!
She DID IN FACT have a recreation with her exact measurements of the Marilyn Monroe dress, but decided las minute to just wear the actual dress. The outrage is not just that the museum lent her the dress, but apparently they did so because she PROMISED them that she only wanted it to make a faithful replica, and obviously LIED.
She bought it, so it's within her own legal rights to do so, and many people should not really care THAT much about a stupid dress. After all, how would it even slightly affect ur life????
@@Thecouncil__1 Imagine dying. Imagine watching people take what you loved and wore, and then wearing it out, ruining it, and then calling you fat because they couldn't fit in YOUR clothes. Shall I just destroy a statue of Christopher Columbus? I mean, we would have found out about America anyways, so he wouldn't be that important, yeah? He just happened to stumble across it, and now we celebrate a day dedicated to him. Unlike Marilyn, his belongings were put in a museum. I've gone a bit far with this I have to admit, but I'm pretty damn sure you wouldn't want people messing with and breaking your stuff.
Why do people keep saying she ruined the Marilyn dress? How did she ruin it exactly? Because if you watch the episode where she wears it, you can see how meticulous she is about preserving it in its original state.
U don’t see the issue. She was gifted something that was bought fair and square and wanted to wear it… some people would rather wear and appreciate their clothing like that rather than just leave it in the closet collecting dust.
@AvaAdore-wx5gg I totally understand that but if it was to be preserved it would never have been sold. Whoever sold it cared more about money than preserving this piece everyone is going off about. To me the seller is the one in the wrong
This is so sad and infuriating. It’s like allowing someone to fingerpaint over a classical oil painting for a one-time publicity stunt. It’s so destructive and disrespectful.
She shouldn't have been able to own the dress in the first place, it should have been in a museum or something. We need to stop letting rich people do whatever tf they want just because they can pay outrageous amounts to do it.
They do these outrageous and destructive things with tax money that they bilked the USA government out of. Now us normal citizens live with homelessness messes and crime because there isn’t money to take care of these sad vulnerable people. Every person in the bottom 50% of income pays a higher tax rate than her or any billionaire
😂😂 it’s a dress. Why shouldn’t she be able to own it? Its not like its stolen art from colonized countries Nor is it sacred burial grounds There’s already one in the museum. Ur focused on the wrong thing.
Me too. She didn’t want to be the first playmate. He used her. And then buried himself next to her. It takes the term “do anything for clout” to a whole new level. He tied his name to hers and rode that wave into the afterlife. He was a predator.
looking at this comments section i think we need to put the word Narcissist on a high shelf until yall learn to not chuck around medical diagnoses when there are plenty of perfectly fine insults out there. self-absorbed, disrespectful, and selfish are all words that can describe damaging a piece of art and Aren't actual mental disorders that you're trying to diagnose strangers with! hope this helps
She did ruin the Marilyn Monroe dress, but considering she bought this one, and it was the stipulations one buying the dress dress that it could not be altered or anything like that when they bought it then the one hurts. She can do whatever she wants to do it.
What is wrong with you people. She needs to think she can ruin whatever she wants she thinks she is special she only got famous for her Sex tape and being half naked and so much fake in her body....no respect
Ok I'm glad it wasn't just me. I was like 'That's not the Oyster Dress, the Oyster Dress is absolutely stunning...and that's a Mummy cosplay." But then it is. And I dont understand what she did.
Your statement is correct, however this is what rich people have done throughout all of history: plundering artifacts that do not belong to them and then act like they own or discovered them. Most of the British monarchy crown jewels were obtained in this fashion.
@@Kikobekillinit Lizzo was given permission *by* the owners of the crystal flute, and had the necessary background to treat the flute with respect and Did so. That's way different.
fr bro. i was mad at marilyn dress, who the hell landed it to her? they must’ve been the one who got blamed for her ruining the dress. however, this dress was her. different cases. she can do anything with this dress whether you like it or not.
@@TheLastEgg08 I get it tbh I didn't watch the end saying it was bought. But if it's something valuable like a collectors item or something historical, even if it's yours, it's not nice to destroy it. Or, as someone said, it's not ethical. (That's why museums just don't break historic pieces) I think of it as belonging to the society if when the owner (Kim) dies the item will be going to a museum. But again, she didn't ""destroy"" it, she wore it - with that giant butt of hers 😂. I still think ppl need to stop selling/lending/letting her breathe near iconic clothes.
She won't take no for an answer she's as entitled as it gets. With Marilyn's dress she said she made her mum go and demand it when they wouldn't give it to her. They use their connections
Honestly, no celebrity should be able to rent, buy or wear historic pieces like this. It ruins them, and gives the celebrity more of the "I'm rich and can do whatever I want without consequences" mindset
This woman is rich enough to commission an exact replica of these dresses so that they can be preserved and would actually flatter her, but instead she is so full of herself she thinks she deserves to wear the exact originals. This is so ridiculous.
exactly. her body is very different from the measurements of these dresses. She couldn't of been comfortable squeezing in Marilyn Monroe's gown. Nor she would of been comfortable with this one. She could of had her own "Swan dress" moment and have something made that fits her perfectly, and steal the show with how drop dead gorgeous it is.
The thing is: She (or maxbe Kayne) bought it. It belongs to her. It may upset people but she can do what she wants with it. And it is a dress... it is meant to be worn even if it is haute couture. The same thing with the Monroe dress. She payed to rent it. It's Ripley's that decided that this is a good idea. And Kim get's all the media intention every time. It totally works for her.
She should buy a dress that's been made to suit her body and not try to squeeze inside someone else's dress that's been made for their body type. RIP the Legendary dresses
She could've gotten a tailor to make a replica of the McQueen dress, one that matched her measurements too. She could've done the same thing with the Marilyn dress too. Who the hell keeps approving her wearing these masterpieces and then ruining them. These dresses should've been kept in a museum, locked away and under controlled conditions.
If it's iconic and legendary, why would you ever sell it to someone who's literally trying to hijack history so HER name and image will be connected to these pieces?🤷♀️
Well when people have enough money they can kinda basically have anything they want remember everyone has a right price and that museum probably did to 🤷
Fr like. Mf so what if only a couple were made. They were made to be worn. And if someone buys one, then it's yours. What? She's gonna buy a dress and store it away forever so it can slowly wither away? Leave her be
@@pfc_escalante …… excuse me.. are you I.. I can’t comprehend what you just said. Either you don’t give a crap about history of any kind or you’re outright stupid
@@anthonymcneil4238You could say that about anything that's stored in a museum, paintings being rotting wood and fabric, etc., so not an argument to me.
Just because she can doesn’t mean she should. Honestly these dresses need to be preserved and cherished but instead they are being used by a celebrity for attention and are being ruined in the process
I watched their show. She didn't do anything to it. She couldn't zip it up, so she altered her own spanx and jazzed it up to blend in with the dress, so the dress was open at the back what we were actually seeing at the back was a modified spanx!
Maybe because the dress only became historical because of the celebrity who wore it? If the designer makes a dress then hangs it on a wall and declares it his master piece do you really think it will become "art" that has everyone talking.
@mistybollinger3312 lol Kim will NEVER be as beautiful,classy,and iconic as Marilyn was and it kills her!!!! I love it. Marilyn is queen forever and always
While I do understand the backlash about the Monroe's dress, this one is a mystery to me. The first one was an actual artifact - not because it was the only one existing but because it also had a history attached to it, it was a statement more than a wear piece. Maybe I missing something, and McQueen's dress has such kind of story, too, but as far as I know, it's just considered unique. Given the fact there are two of them, and the other one is in the museum, for me it's more than enough "safety" for a dress that is just that - a dress
I don't know why she bought the second oyster dress and then paid a 3rd party to alter it, rather than just getting in contact with the house of Alexander McQueen and getting them to make her one to her measurements. That's literally what couture is, and I can't imagine them refusing to do it for her (or do it for Kanye, on her behalf, seeing as it was a gift).
They wouldn’t have made it because the person who made it is no longer alive. It being archival I am surprised they let her have it. But fashion houses won’t just jump to remake an archival piece for anyone. They may have been okay to make something similar, but archival pieces hold their worth because they are never remade.
![Sean Rii, Karyon, Sharzkii - Taungule [My Love] (Official Music Video)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eJoMuypbSzQ/mqdefault.jpg)
They should not be selling historic pieces to celebrities.
We shouldn’t care more about a dress than human lives but this made news at one point and people still talk about it… but no fck the starving, sick, struggling and unwell to keep up with this cheap family
Or let them get away with murder… 😩
Yes. This is the bigger issue. They’re so desperate for cash they’re willing to ruin art for a rich brat?
It's like buying limited editions for really rich people💀💀 quite literally limited
It’s not historic it’s just one of 2
She's collecting those items like Infinity stones i can't -
So accurate!
😭
😂😂😂😂
Swiii u love movies
She’s creating scandal. Cause all press, even bad, is good.
Her alterations made a previously gorgeous gown absolutely hideous 😭
THANK YOU i was looking for this comment - looks hideous now like some torn rags not like the beautiful siren like way it looked on a thin model vs a curvy one - not every gown is made for a curvy figure and there’s nothing wrong with that it’s just a piece of art not something sold to the masses
Kim is apparently really good at that. She can take a design that is otherwise intriguing or beautiful, and make it look cheap and tacky.
Agreed
Thank goodness one is preserved in a museum. I hope McQueen refuses to design for her in protest of how she had no regard for his previous works.
McQueen has passed away in 2010.
Had he been alive, she probably wouldn’t have been able to in the first place. We’re two for two on her disrespecting the dead.
@@localmenace3043because kim k is a coward and the dead can’t defend themselves
He's dead tho so he can't really design something for her anyway
Marilyn’s dress should NEVER have been allowed out of the Smithsonian
frrrr
Well Ripley's as far as I know doesn't even have museum credentials so
@@wyass4722 and
@@staceyvitale So they are also responsible for not getting licensed to hold on historical pieces. Their workers probably didn't even know the damage that wearing it could do, they weren't trained. You can see it by the videos where they're wearing gloves to hold the dress, even if fashion historians say it's best to hold it with your hands to do less damage. Non licensed institutions shouldn't have such pieces in the first place
It was *NOT* the Smithsonian who cares for that dress. If it were it would have never been allowed out of the museum. It's Ripleys belive it or not who does
The saddest part about Marilyns dress is not even that she ruined it, but that Marilyn explicitly wanted no one else to ever wear that dress...
she was a narcissist too ?
@@crimberliesno she wasn't
@@crimberliesthe designer literally made Marilyn's dress according to Marilyn's body shape and size. It wasn't made to be worn by anyone else 🫤
Edit: MOM IM FAMOUS
@@sireniral9003 i’m just trying to understand, she wanted her goods and belongings to be destroyed and buried with her ? or was it specifically against other women so they don’t enjoy her stuff after she died ? aren’t both ways narcissistic a little bit anyway .. ?
@@crimberlies it's her stuff, it's not narcissistic. Those dresses belonged to her. Whatever and however she wanted her stuff was her decision
She's allowed to, but she shouldn't.
For the Monroe dress, there was rhinestones or what they are missing, the zipper was destroyed, and the material warped.
They made an EXACT REPLICA in her size and she still decided to wead Marilyn's original one
Cause she thinks she's fit the dress while the dress is unzipped😂
Yeah, renting it when you had a perfect replica to fit you is incredibly disrespectful. She knew it wouldn’t fit. They both have very distinct figures but they don’t match.
The oyster dress? Meh. She owns it AND there’s a better kept replica in the MOMA.
*she paid for it she can do whatever she wants*
@@meowwww_06 well i disagree with this statement
Just because you can afford something doesn't mean you can do that 😮💨
Especially ruined historical dresses
When you have the money to buy on, then you can talk she bought it, and she can do what she wants with it. You're just a person you could die for. All she cares about is not making a difference. You can't do anything about it, so let it go. It's not a big deal. Mm is dead, and her dress is fine. It's not like she can do anything about it either so stfu
People need to stop selling her these timeless outfits
anything for money
How did she ruined it please tell me??
@@kalyanirumale1986 she altered and changed parts of the dress
@@casper3791 that of which she can do because she legally owns the dress. If an expensive beautiful dress that I owned didn’t fit me I’d alter it too, wouldn’t you?
@@bizarrekimten it's not the issue that she altered it to fit her it's the issue that she's altering extremely beautiful dresses that have been worn by incredibly known people and iconic dresses that they've worn or created. Therefore ruining the beauty behind the dresses if you don't agree you don't have to but that is my opinion and you don't have to like it
Who tf sold them the dress in the first place? Thats who to blame.
Id be more forgiving if it at least looked good on her. But it doesn't.
Clearly the curators of these historical dresses don’t value them as they should or they would’ve told them no.
There dead how can they say no
@@zionglory1001 you don't know what a curator is do you
The Monroe dress was owned by Ripleys Believe it or Not after winning it in an auction and lent to Kim K after Kris called to complain.
The worlds of collecting, selling, donating, and displaying art are so vast and complex with their own politics within each world. Unfortunately things of value gets lost throughout time due to lack of care or education, lack of finance and individual selfish agendas
@@maddylee5607 So Ripley's, Instead of standing their ground and tell Chris *WHY* Kim can't wear it, gave into the pressure. I pray that gown went to the hands of a skilled restoration person who can source the same crystal beads from that era, and can reinforce the seams that was stressed using conservator's techniques similar on how they reinforce Queen Victoria's gowns for display. (edit: Fix of Queen Victoria's name. Victorian? really?)
It's a dress...pieces of fabric. They have no real value in famine.
“Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me” Stop giving this chick works of art
Her husband bought it for her. Nobody "gave it" to her.
*Yep! Especially since she & her clan has ruined much more than just a few dresses...!!!*
@@notsunnydaysahead *stop selling this to her then
@@nixie117 makes no sense. Why don't you buy it to protect it?
Stop giving her attention. We should give her the ole Marie Antionette.
If this woman thinks that wearing iconic dresses will bring her more fame, she is SO wrong.
Oh it brings her fame for sure. It's negative publicity that's all. But her fame certainly increases 😢
@@ShriyaditaSS after all, bad publicity is still publicity and we can do nothing about that my friend.
@@Kpopobssesed476 Exactly
Imagine buying a john william waterhouse and then painting a bbl onto the girl 😂 literally whyyyy
if you are in charge of a ICONIC and VERY UNIQUE dress, do your job properly. it doesn’t matter who is trying to get it, ITS A FREAKING ARTIFACT.
Yet ARTIFACTS need to be cherished!
U act like it's something that they can just throw away and isn't an iconic piece of beauty.
Oh sure yea let's just ruin authentic art because u know fuck everyone's dreams and hard work that they put their soul into.
The world is fucked
I totally agree with you
@@loyxifengal2171 that’s what they were saying.
ikr, ppl keep trying to sell them..
We should be mad at the people who let her buy and rent these important dresses
And the one who bought and altered it
Why u care sm what she does
We shouldn't be mad at all. She is wearing her dress how she wants.
why not both 👨🦯
They can’t do anything about it after all she got the money and people are doing their job but none of them have respect, she has no respect as he buys and ruins the dresses and neither do the ones who gave her the dress and support her despite damaging such historical and meaningful pieces
Tell her NO!
they don't call them the KarTRASHians for nothing
call her lara croft the way she be raiding tombs 💀💀💀
bro 💀
That is literally her dress, she can do what she wants with it
@@Eunjichoi05 If I buy the Mona Lisa, can I eat it?
@@nerveagent1905 if you want to? Won’t be good for you, but you do you if you really want to eat it
@@nerveagent1905 yes
Nobody should be allowed to have these iconic dresses! Museum was stupid to allow KK to even wear Marilyn’s dress!!! That was one of a kind- she destroyed it! I don’t care how much $$ they paid to “ borrow” or buy that Oyster dress😮Hate me if you like - I could care less! RIP Marilyn ❤👵
It doesn't matter if you have the physique that is suitable for the dress. If not don't ruin dresses.😭
People need to stop giving/selling her these dresses
for the money she's probably putting on the table, I sadly doubt they will
@@frenchish1177 same 😢
I Hope they sell the second one too… I’m sorry the dresses are disgusting
Least she can afford it broky
Honestly, she’s an icon. She surpassed Paris Hilton, became one of the biggest names in fashion, and she looks good asf in those dresses. She forever changed the way people see them and that’s fucking iconic.
Someone get this lady a tailor that can perfectly replicate these dresses instead of her ripping and tearing them to shreds
Calm down it's just a dress it's supposed to be worn
There are even 2 of them so one of them is just a copy. It's the design that makes it unique and the brand can make several more it's not like a piece of art made with the artist own hands that can never be reproduced dine his dead, the seamstress that made this 2 could make a few more but then they wouldn't be exclusive and worth so much.
Well, she was made an exact replica of the monroe dress that fit her, but she still wore the original. I dont think a replica wouldve worked, unfortunately
@@libelinhaa2079 YEA BUT VERY VALUABLE AND THE ONLY ONES IN THE WORLD ARE MORE LIKE PIECES OF ART, think of it as Mona Lisa, it's the only one and original in the world
Same with starry night
And other very valuable artwork, like statues etc!
@@kr1s.p_alt there are 2 actually and it's not exactly like that because fabric will not last has long has a painting even when not exposed to sunlight and protected from other elements. Also you can't restore it like a painting and even those can and have been destroyed by bad restoration jobs.
Btw people can read fine without caps lock 😂
Yes with her fake ass and fake body that is so exaggerated that it literally doesn’t exist in nature. It’s ridiculous.
It’s honestly gross. She destroyed the Marilyn Monroe dress and and then altered another incredibly famous dress. The fact she thinks she has the right to do this is shocking to me
The amount of disrespect
Just a simple tip, you see Kim wanting a dress, just run.
Ban her from the shops/museums
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Lol. I know what you mean but there's reallly no need to run. For once, people just need to kindly but firmly use the word "NO" with Kim! It's that simple.
She has all the money and resources to replicate these dresses to her exact measurements 😭😭😭
Why would she do that when she can have what she wants. The entitlement and tone deafness of rich people is astounding.
THIS.
Fr.. She needs too atop buying these.. They are historical items.. 😭
No youre not able to repare the marilyn dress because the fabric isnt made anymore..also you alter it! Shes a pig for that..
I mean why are people selling these "timeless peices of art" to her? This one honestly i dont understand the significance. It was made by a designer and theres just 2. Thats its. Its rare sure but in the end its art thats meant to be worn. She had it altered to fit her its not destroyed
"They like, have another one, so?"
🤦♀️
What am I missing here???!!! People are mad because she altered her own property?? Really?? I can imagine, maybe that was the thought behind putting the other on display in a museum.. so that people could admire it as a piece of art.
I guess because it's such a timeless one of kind piece you wear it as it is you don't go alter it like it's just a random dress you just bought, maybe she should've made a replica her size bcs that dress took hours and hardwork to make and it's of great value, to just take/add pieces and modify it like that
this is what I assume most people are referring which I partly agree with too but idk
Yup, that's my thought. Marilyn's dress is a different story, but this is literally her property. She can do what she likes
Shes the british museum of fashion tbh. They should have told her no from the get go
It's like buying a significant painting and modifying it.
Its not even about kim anymore.
If theres only 2 of these dresses and they're as histotic and precious as made out to be.. then they shouldn't be sold.
Its absolutely about kims nasty ass! She comes and waves her checkbook to these museums and borrows these iconic dresses because shes so lame and boring that cant stand out on her own. Why is kim even relevant these days? Because she has money!
Marilyn's Dress was not sold to her ...
Money and power are a terrible thing
That's why it's fake news to distract
I think she feels extremely special when she wears these dresses no one else can, that's why she is willing to destroy these pieces of history, just to feed her own ego and self-importance.
She's a Narcissist, don't ever forget that.
I agree
She thinks of herself too highly there was this podcast in which Kanye says that Kim is modern day marilyn. Kim is absolutely vain yeah she’s a billionaire and really made her way but her attitude is horrible
I guess my comment was not popular because you don't know what a Narcissist is 😂
It’s just a piece of clothing, calm down
I read savage beauty, a book showing several of mcqueens creations and this one made me actually cried
Kim is becoming irrelevant so she wore M Monroe’s dress for clout and she destroyed it. Then she purchased and wore the Alexander M dress this only caused people to dislike her, for example the most iconic person in fashion…Anna Wintor. Kim’s MET GALA invitation should be revoked.
People need to stop selling/ letting the Kardashians borrow things
Oml fr
It's not borrowing
Not to Borrow is absolutely correct. Let them sell the piece. But they should not lend out museum pieces! Isn't that what a museum is for - preservation? Not ruination?
people need to stop keeping these people popular altogether
Kim Kardashian is a whole billionaire she is paying these Institutions big bucks, so quit blaming them, go find a corner to cry at😭😭😭
does she have the rights to do whatever she wants with the dress once she has bought it? yes. Should she have been able to buy it in the first place? hell na
If she can afford it then she has the right to buy it.
@@DiamondNYC exactly. denying someone the right to buy something perfectly legal because you dont like them isnt how it works
@@DiamondNYC this person wasn't saying she has no rights to buy it, they're saying it shouldn't have been for sale in the first place
@@rathyio who was doing that?
@@ughicanteven5896 i never said doing, im saying people are implying they shouldnt be sold to her.
She don't Care who or what the meaning behind the story is or the history is just as long as she is the center of attention PERIOD
"And fans are furious!"
.....fans?
“Kim Kardashian buys the Mona Lisa for her kids. Now it’s unrecognizable!”
It now has False eyelashes and humongous hips
😭😭 I am dead
Is it sad I can see that happening
@@kaylanewis5392 and the worst part...
It has eyebrows!
(Sorry if this is offensive to some people)
@@jedimando9258 no the mona Lisa cost billion of dollar (even Elon Musk can't buy it because it's a national tresure)
Remember kids, just because you CAN doesnt mean you SHOULD
I can and i will
-Mr. Goshawk
if i could i would
@@capsnerd Why would you buy a dress to alter it mayorly if you have more then enough money to have that exact design outcome made on personalized size etc by any team of designers. It would similair to me Painting a Japanese anime girl on the Nachtwacht from Van Gogh if I would be able to pay for the said painting
That way of thinking has been thrown out. Now everybody’s acting crazy.
Hell, if I had the money to afford that, you better believe I’m squeezing myself into that dress. Life is too short to be wondering about what makes other people angry
its not her fault? she literally bought them, like what part of buying something and then WEARING it is wrong? it should be blamed on the money hungry sellers that sold such important pieces. they shouldve been kept and preserved, why were they even auctioned in the first place? i dont blame kim, shes literally just buying what she wants. if i had the money id buy marilyns dress too?? 🤷🤷
What clothes the body is irrelevant. It is what dresses the heart and soul that identifies character.
Why cant she just have a replica made instead of destroying iconic art pieces? You wouldn't buy the Mona Lisa and have someone paint your face over hers. Her narcissism is insane
I would
Ikr? 😭 She is a BILLIONAIRE. she can afford it 😭
Narcissists usually don’t care enough about art to do something like that. Preserving a piece of art would mean that they wouldn’t be able to rub it in everyone’s faces how filthy rich they are.
thats a good question, if I was Kim, I would ask for a replica (on what you said) instead of wearing an iconic dress of history
But people especially us,girls would make fun of her. Sure not everyone but MANY would! Don’t people try to find issues w/popular people? So, people would call her cheap and lame😐😓
I'm upset with her and the people who sold it to her. It's like giving art to a toddler and expecting it not to be ruined at this point.
Unfortunately people with money can do whatever they want
Throwing art into a trash box
Yep
Yes, be upset with your first world problems. It's not like there's people out there who are still dying from tuberculosis and curable diseases. But yeah you put your foot down over us a piece of cloth. It's the under the world.
Y’all need to stop she bought it she wanted to wear it her style it’s their dress but her style you can’t force Someone to copy someone else’s style
She bought the dress and altered it to fit her. While some people want couture to be purely for art purposes, others like the aspect that it is a wearable art, so they will wear it.
She's got rhino hips!
PEOPLE
It’s not about the clothes, it’s about the disrespect for the original artist. It’s like buying a famous painting to paint over it. Some clothes aren’t actually meant to be worn, some are specifically designed to be art pieces. And yea, Marilyn didn’t want anyone else to wear that dress, so we should respect her wishes. It was her property, and she should be able to control what happens to it.
Issue is, when you’re dead, what you want stops mattering 😢
Ikrr
Its like if i bought the mona lisa just to paint over it and make it look like my face, not okay at all
😂😂😂
Plus it was custom to Marilyn's body. Now it's torn. Ruined. You wouldn't buy a dress in that condition at a thrift shop.
If she didn't want it worn she should've put it on her will. Not being an asshole but being legit. Most famous people have wills early for these types of things
Don’t want someone to alter a historical dress? Don’t sell them off.
We aren't the ones selling it tho
@Pipa Apin your case, no one is to be blamed. Kim wanted a dress, the museum wanted the money.
@@sunflowr393 cause ur all too poor
@@vay908 seriously lol people are haters
@@vay908 no, its cause we got no business even owning it
Who remember 's mcgonagall from somewhere ¿
( Harry Potter theme song starts playing )
People on the internet are soo Dramatic. And aren't clothes just ment to be worn? And they are supposed to fit you
That dress was an artifact from another dead celebrity. Buying it and altering it to the point of no return is morally wrong. That’s why people are mad
It's like buying a painting (lets say Monets Haystacks) and then painting over it to make it match the aesthetic of your house. You simply don't do that.
you can do whatever you want with things you own. if you dont want "arts" to be destroyed keep them in a museum and dont sell
@@pieiero3006it's true that you can do whatever to the things you own. But you should know there were lots of masterpiece was ruined before they can reach the museum. The museum can't "protect" the arts if their current owner doesn't sell them or donate them to the museum.
@@kieunhungpham7869 they already had that dress and they decided to sell it to kim k
I agree like rich people need to leave crap alone noone wants to see your dumb self in a historical or rare piece
If you own it do what you want.
What you simply don't do is tell others what to do
And also, it's not like that at all.
The owner of the dress wanted her to wear it. You don't get a say. Get over it
It's the fact that she can literally hire an entire team to recreate any garment for her but she still chooses to damage originals 😤
Okay maybe I'm wrong here but wouldn't that be plagiarism? Art theft? Like with this newest piece, idk how the designer would have felt about her knocking it off and then wearing it on the red carpet. I grasp the issue here, I'm just saying that idk if art theft is really the answer? Especially as a celebrity who can afford originals
Lol can you imagine the backlash she'd get if she just ripped off a design like that? Lol!
I dont think you know the consequences of stealing an original design 💀 girl that's not how things work
How does that harm ur home?
@@saragupta1638 stop trolling and get a life, sick of seeing your ugly comments.
It’s like if someone bought the Mona Lisa does it make it okay if they decided to alter it?
yes.
@@gull6037 ? Why though. It’s a historical piece, an important piece of artwork in the history of art. It’s a moral issue I guess and some of us understand the importance of preserving and respecting that history.
The problem is people thinking that buying something should not give you ownership rights over that thing. How ridiculous.
it fully shows that her love for fashion comes from vanity rather than passion for the art of it
Yes
Well said!
she’s so obviously doing this for attention
@@lindseyhoule9679What has she done? I'm clueless. How did she destroy one of Marilyn's dresses? Amalia.
and that’s okay!
She didn’t “allegedly” ruin Marilyn Monroe’s dress, she full on ruined it
ok but y’all didn’t even care abt the dress until she wore it. nobody even knew the damn dress existed. y’all just want to hate for no reason
Her out of proportion figure sure pops those seams. 😂
@@noladelrusso7614Dude, even my country bumpkin USSR remembering grandma KNOWS about the diamond dress. It's a historical artifact, period.
@@noladelrusso7614I'm a fan of Marilyn Monroe, and knew of the Diamond Dress. I grew up watching her old films and singing her old songs. I even have a blue dress similar to that in Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (mine is much easier to walk in...lol). Many of her styles were used by dollmakers - Barbie being one - Bob Mackie has multiple limited editions with Barbie. If you look at the Jem and the Holograms line, there were many influences in colour palette, and designs.
The Oyster dress is horrendously ugly. I know that McQueen "pushed boundaries" of fashion, but it's inelegant despite the meaning of it being a "female warrior emerging from beneath the battered shell".
I also fail to see why no-one has mentioned the first owner, Angie Barrett, who wore the dress to The (Beaux) Art Ball at Cannes FF in 2003.
Despite not being a fan of the Kardashians, WHY is everyone obsessing over a dress from the 2020 oscars?
At the Met Gala, KK changed into the gown in a dressing room at the bottom of the steps, and then into a replica of the Diamond dress for the remainder of the event.
On top of that it literally goes against Monroes wishes of never having anyone wear the dress. Absolutely disgusting
She did not wear the dress from the Smithsonian, the one she tried to wear is from Ripley's Orlando ( couldnt get it over her hips) after making a charitable donation and she wore a replica in the end.
Her exhusband had bought this one for her as a gift. People are allowed to wear their own clothes. Many people wear and alter vintage clothes. Though she did not own the Marilyn Monroe dress, it was archived, thats why it's so sad it was harmed.
She is the embodiment of "you cannot buy class with money".
@@chankero4776 especially cause she is the ugliest on the inside.
If you start your career with porn, there is no hope of gaining class.
She has more class then you ever will 😅😂😂
@@REBECKASHEALTHNFITNESSHUB Sure honey..keep dreaming...
@@REBECKASHEALTHNFITNESSHUBboy she did porn…..there was no class from the start😂 im sure her father is rolling over in his grave
The fact she was given permission to ruin the Monroe dress is what pisses me off…
Exactly! Like, yeah Kim is acting hella weird by ruining massive pieces of recent history, but who the hell is selling these things to her or the person who bought these things for her, like… they’re enabling them to pull these sort of stunts!
She DID IN FACT have a recreation with her exact measurements of the Marilyn Monroe dress, but decided las minute to just wear the actual dress. The outrage is not just that the museum lent her the dress, but apparently they did so because she PROMISED them that she only wanted it to make a faithful replica, and obviously LIED.
She bought it, so it's within her own legal rights to do so, and many people should not really care THAT much about a stupid dress. After all, how would it even slightly affect ur life????
@@Thecouncil__1 Imagine dying. Imagine watching people take what you loved and wore, and then wearing it out, ruining it, and then calling you fat because they couldn't fit in YOUR clothes. Shall I just destroy a statue of Christopher Columbus? I mean, we would have found out about America anyways, so he wouldn't be that important, yeah? He just happened to stumble across it, and now we celebrate a day dedicated to him. Unlike Marilyn, his belongings were put in a museum.
I've gone a bit far with this I have to admit, but I'm pretty damn sure you wouldn't want people messing with and breaking your stuff.
Why do people keep saying she ruined the Marilyn dress? How did she ruin it exactly? Because if you watch the episode where she wears it, you can see how meticulous she is about preserving it in its original state.
U don’t see the issue. She was gifted something that was bought fair and square and wanted to wear it… some people would rather wear and appreciate their clothing like that rather than just leave it in the closet collecting dust.
@AvaAdore-wx5gg I totally understand that but if it was to be preserved it would never have been sold. Whoever sold it cared more about money than preserving this piece everyone is going off about. To me the seller is the one in the wrong
This is so sad and infuriating. It’s like allowing someone to fingerpaint over a classical oil painting for a one-time publicity stunt. It’s so destructive and disrespectful.
She shouldn't have been able to own the dress in the first place, it should have been in a museum or something. We need to stop letting rich people do whatever tf they want just because they can pay outrageous amounts to do it.
They do these outrageous and destructive things with tax money that they bilked the USA government out of. Now us normal citizens live with homelessness messes and crime because there isn’t money to take care of these sad vulnerable people. Every person in the bottom 50% of income pays a higher tax rate than her or any billionaire
Fr. With the Marilyn Monroe dress, they shouldve laughed her out of the building. But instead they went along with her idea
@@s.a.munknown4300 Exactly 💯
Like there's a Tesla parked on what planet ? Whatever happened to having a moral compass? Filthy Rich projecting their filthy ways. SMH. 😔✌️❤️🦋🙏
😂😂 it’s a dress. Why shouldn’t she be able to own it?
Its not like its stolen art from colonized countries
Nor is it sacred burial grounds
There’s already one in the museum.
Ur focused on the wrong thing.
I think the saddest thing with Marilyn is having Hugh Hefner being buried next to her when she despised him.
Me too. She didn’t want to be the first playmate. He used her. And then buried himself next to her. It takes the term “do anything for clout” to a whole new level. He tied his name to hers and rode that wave into the afterlife. He was a predator.
Yikes
Not just "next to her". On top of her. Face down too I believe. Marilyn cannot rest in peace and it crushes me.
That's disturbing. Hefner was a depraved individual.
wait really?? ew wtf why can’t people just let her rest in peace???? like jfc she was tortured and treated horribly enough when she was alive
looking at this comments section i think we need to put the word Narcissist on a high shelf until yall learn to not chuck around medical diagnoses when there are plenty of perfectly fine insults out there. self-absorbed, disrespectful, and selfish are all words that can describe damaging a piece of art and Aren't actual mental disorders that you're trying to diagnose strangers with! hope this helps
just because you CAN, doesn't mean you SHOULD. A lesson I think the Kardashians have never learned.
…“But no amount of vintage dresses gives you dignity”
THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU DID 👹
YES!!
She's not a saint and she's not what you think... she's an actress
Suits her tho😂❤
@@sunaynadeepaksingh8513 she is better known for the things she does on the mattress...
Kim needs to NOT touch priceless pieces of clothing that cannot be fixed. Just hire someone to make a dupe. She has enough money
It’s hers. And it’s not priceless, cause they bought it.
@@lauriehand1021She ruined it
it is not the original so what is the point...that´s how her brain works. she needs to be stopped by the people who give it to her.
People are dying in the world..
if i had money like that why get a fake like , it like having the money to buy Gucci but instead of buying Gucci u spend it on fake Gucci like bffr
She did ruin the Marilyn Monroe dress, but considering she bought this one, and it was the stipulations one buying the dress dress that it could not be altered or anything like that when they bought it then the one hurts. She can do whatever she wants to do it.
FRRR
SHE’S GETTING CANCELED WITH THIS ONE🔥🔥🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥
It's not completely her fault, it's the museums who let them buy or borrow these dresses.
Agree.
they didn’t buy the one from the museum, it’s still there
This is HER dress though. She can do exactly what she wants with it
What is wrong with you people. She needs to think she can ruin whatever she wants she thinks she is special she only got famous for her Sex tape and being half naked and so much fake in her body....no respect
Ikr precious stuff like these should not be for sale
it’s amazing how she makes these super expensive and rare dresses look so cheap
Plastic does that to a lot of stuff
Ikr, kim looks like a mummy, toilet paper roll in that oyster dress
They’re just fabric and clothes calm down
do u rly think that, or are you just an untouched womanhating incel
Ok I'm glad it wasn't just me. I was like 'That's not the Oyster Dress, the Oyster Dress is absolutely stunning...and that's a Mummy cosplay." But then it is. And I dont understand what she did.
There's still one in a museum. It's her dress to wear how she wants.. I don't even like Kim but people are acting wild.
Its just a dress at the end of the day. And its hers, why do people care so much.
Rich people should not be allowed within 100 feet of culturally significant items unless they’re the one that made it culturally significant
Your statement is correct, however this is what rich people have done throughout all of history: plundering artifacts that do not belong to them and then act like they own or discovered them. Most of the British monarchy crown jewels were obtained in this fashion.
What about Lizzo and the Crystal Flute
@@Kikobekillinit Lizzo was given permission *by* the owners of the crystal flute, and had the necessary background to treat the flute with respect and Did so. That's way different.
@@ohokay4663 yes and that is why today I am making an example out of this comment as to why “blanket statements” for opinions are kind of like, moot.
@@ohokay4663 based on the logic of OPs comment, it’s still not ok for Lizzo to be near the flute.
Honestly we need to start putting the accountability in the person who landed her the dress. Like how can this keep happening?
She BOUGHT the dress, the dress is HERS. The Marilyn Monroe dress however, that dress shouldn’t even been landed to her.
@@TheLastEgg08 Barista Plus Even if she did own Marilyns dress
Even though it's within her right
Ethically speaking is it ethical
fr bro. i was mad at marilyn dress, who the hell landed it to her? they must’ve been the one who got blamed for her ruining the dress.
however, this dress was her. different cases. she can do anything with this dress whether you like it or not.
@@TheLastEgg08 I get it tbh I didn't watch the end saying it was bought.
But if it's something valuable like a collectors item or something historical, even if it's yours, it's not nice to destroy it. Or, as someone said, it's not ethical. (That's why museums just don't break historic pieces)
I think of it as belonging to the society if when the owner (Kim) dies the item will be going to a museum.
But again, she didn't ""destroy"" it, she wore it - with that giant butt of hers 😂. I still think ppl need to stop selling/lending/letting her breathe near iconic clothes.
She won't take no for an answer she's as entitled as it gets. With Marilyn's dress she said she made her mum go and demand it when they wouldn't give it to her. They use their connections
Honestly, no celebrity should be able to rent, buy or wear historic pieces like this. It ruins them, and gives the celebrity more of the "I'm rich and can do whatever I want without consequences" mindset
Bro wtf ever happened to not destroying history? What’s next? Kim destroying an important monument to erect a statue of herself?
This woman is rich enough to commission an exact replica of these dresses so that they can be preserved and would actually flatter her, but instead she is so full of herself she thinks she deserves to wear the exact originals. This is so ridiculous.
exactly. her body is very different from the measurements of these dresses. She couldn't of been comfortable squeezing in Marilyn Monroe's gown. Nor she would of been comfortable with this one. She could of had her own "Swan dress" moment and have something made that fits her perfectly, and steal the show with how drop dead gorgeous it is.
This!!
What’s ridiculous is y’all crying over a piece of fabric
@@H3llo- Something tells me you don't sew.
@@zombiedoggie2732 something tells me y’all are too sensitive
Fire the people who r selling her these damn dresses 🧑🏽🦱
So now people are not allowed to sell and buy what they want. Stop with your Socialist ideas.
i legit thought u meant burn them at first
@@idonthavegoodhumor it was optional
Imagine getting mad about others property 💀
@@davidesezobor7022 who’s mad
Why do ppl keep letting this woman destroy pieces of history?!
The thing is: She (or maxbe Kayne) bought it. It belongs to her. It may upset people but she can do what she wants with it. And it is a dress... it is meant to be worn even if it is haute couture. The same thing with the Monroe dress. She payed to rent it. It's Ripley's that decided that this is a good idea.
And Kim get's all the media intention every time. It totally works for her.
The problem is that this woman can make a better replica of any ever existed dress but she proceeds to destroy the originals.
She bought the dress, she is well within her rights to alter it to fit her size
@@nehalmahajan9544 would you say that about someone who cut down a Dali or a Banksy to fit over thier fireplace.
@@nehalmahajan9544 im gonna buy a lion and alter it to fit me just right :)
The Marilyn Monroe one was a replica, and again this dress was gifted to her
@@nehalmahajan9544 i buy the mona lisa and im gonna vandalise it for an occasion
She should buy a dress that's been made to suit her body and not try to squeeze inside someone else's dress that's been made for their body type. RIP the Legendary dresses
I agree she is thick to large for that style
Frrr her hips are too big for little dresses
@@lydiaparker6731 it is her butt implants that is the problem, she buys iconic dresses and ruins them with her distorted figure.
exactly, it’s doesn’t fit her plastic body
She didnt actually squeezed in, she altered it.
She could've gotten a tailor to make a replica of the McQueen dress, one that matched her measurements too. She could've done the same thing with the Marilyn dress too.
Who the hell keeps approving her wearing these masterpieces and then ruining them. These dresses should've been kept in a museum, locked away and under controlled conditions.
If it's iconic and legendary, why would you ever sell it to someone who's literally trying to hijack history so HER name and image will be connected to these pieces?🤷♀️
It is her dress so she can technically alter it but she shouldn't have been able to buy it.
Well when people have enough money they can kinda basically have anything they want remember everyone has a right price and that museum probably did to 🤷
AGREED
Fr like. Mf so what if only a couple were made. They were made to be worn. And if someone buys one, then it's yours. What? She's gonna buy a dress and store it away forever so it can slowly wither away? Leave her be
@@pfc_escalante …… excuse me.. are you I.. I can’t comprehend what you just said. Either you don’t give a crap about history of any kind or you’re outright stupid
@シAva well then read it again so you can comprehend it. This comment is not for people who are emotionally triggered.
It's just sad that Fashion history isn't taken as seriously as other works of art just because it's girly
Just wait till she gets her hands on the Mona Lisa. Then everyone will finally realize the menace they created.
It's just sad you think a gown rotting in a museum is being taken seriously.
@@anthonymcneil4238You could say that about anything that's stored in a museum, paintings being rotting wood and fabric, etc., so not an argument to me.
@@gelatinny1089 the issue is, Paintings are supposed to be looked at, garments are made to be worn.
What’s “art” in that thing Kim is wearing tho? Looks like a curtain attacked by a cat.
The audacity of people worrying about rich folks. She owns it, she can do what she wants.
Just because she can doesn’t mean she should. Honestly these dresses need to be preserved and cherished but instead they are being used by a celebrity for attention and are being ruined in the process
As a casual fashion history nerd, my heart BROKE when I heard about Marilyn’s dress.
It wasn't ruined at all.
@@kayladonnrichardson7384yes it is the seam is stretched alot of the jewels are falling off. Look up before and after pics
@@kayladonnrichardson7384 yes is was damaged. It had rips and seems torn. That’s considered ruined to me.
I watched their show. She didn't do anything to it. She couldn't zip it up, so she altered her own spanx and jazzed it up to blend in with the dress, so the dress was open at the back what we were actually seeing at the back was a modified spanx!
😂😂😂 sad
How about we stop letting celebrities wear historical dresses? It's they're own fault for letting them use it 🤦🏻♀️
Especially since she kills the beauty if these iconic dresses
Maybe because the dress only became historical because of the celebrity who wore it? If the designer makes a dress then hangs it on a wall and declares it his master piece do you really think it will become "art" that has everyone talking.
Read the room girl... definitely a replica is the BEST option.
"within their rights" has seldom been a good excuse. Lots of awful stuff was and IS legal
no one, and i mean NO ONE looks better than marilyn when wearing her iconic dress.
And no one ever will!!!
@mistybollinger3312 lol Kim will NEVER be as beautiful,classy,and iconic as Marilyn was and it kills her!!!! I love it. Marilyn is queen forever and always
Truly.
While I do understand the backlash about the Monroe's dress, this one is a mystery to me. The first one was an actual artifact - not because it was the only one existing but because it also had a history attached to it, it was a statement more than a wear piece. Maybe I missing something, and McQueen's dress has such kind of story, too, but as far as I know, it's just considered unique. Given the fact there are two of them, and the other one is in the museum, for me it's more than enough "safety" for a dress that is just that - a dress
I WISH THIS IS ALL I HAD TO WORRY ABOUT... "Olymups has fallen"!!!
I don't know why she bought the second oyster dress and then paid a 3rd party to alter it, rather than just getting in contact with the house of Alexander McQueen and getting them to make her one to her measurements. That's literally what couture is, and I can't imagine them refusing to do it for her (or do it for Kanye, on her behalf, seeing as it was a gift).
They probably wouldn’t do that if he made it and he’s gone. The other two lose some of their value.
They wouldn’t have made it because the person who made it is no longer alive. It being archival I am surprised they let her have it. But fashion houses won’t just jump to remake an archival piece for anyone. They may have been okay to make something similar, but archival pieces hold their worth because they are never remade.
I read “couture” in rarity’s voice 😀
It wouldn't be the same dress even if they made. AMcQ himself made that
It was a first didnu listen to the whole video
Can we just stop giving away priceless art pieces for the right dollar sign? This is ridiculous
You know their kind, throwing away any sense of integrity for a few extra shekles of silver
Especially to so undeserving people