KINEMATICS | Serial robot vs. Parallel robot (This is not CGI)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
  • Six degrees of freedom (6DOF) achieved in two completely different ways. The serial architecture of the world's smallest industrial robot from Mecademic (www.mecademic.com) has a large workspace and compact design while the parallel architecture of the Hexapod (also known as a Gough-Stewart platform) can reach extremely high speed and acceleration since all the heavy parts (motors, guides, gearboxes) can be mounted on the fixed base.
    Instagram: / olekstepanenko
    GrabCAD: grabcad.com/ol...
    • Project idea
    • Design
    • Programming
    • Filming
    • Music
    by Oleksandr Stepanenko
    #kinematics #robotics #automation
    In order to repost this video, you must add the following in your description (including the links below):
    Created by Oleksandr Stepanenko
    RUclips: / oleksandrstepanenko
    LinkedIn: / olekstepanenko
    Instagram: / olekstepanenko
    Any modification of the video or audio in any way is not permitted.

Комментарии • 1 тыс.

  • @muskratondatra8294
    @muskratondatra8294 Год назад +205

    what does it do you Ask? Surgery? NO it makes Bombs remotely... lol

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  Год назад +38

      And this is what we need most right now! 🇺🇦😎

    • @burt591
      @burt591 10 месяцев назад +2

      I mean it can do different things, like pretty much every tool

  • @KaranSingh-jr2eu
    @KaranSingh-jr2eu 3 года назад +6716

    why does it feel like theres a rap battle going on

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  3 года назад +534

      I have the same feeling 🙂

    • @memesfromdeepspace1075
      @memesfromdeepspace1075 3 года назад +69

      More like dance battle

    • @VJFranzK
      @VJFranzK 3 года назад +33

      @@memesfromdeepspace1075 specifically, break dancing! isolations

    • @jagadishgospat2548
      @jagadishgospat2548 3 года назад +9

      @@OleksandrStepanenko filling? Really

    • @pactube8833
      @pactube8833 3 года назад +7

      @@jagadishgospat2548 Please , make at least 10 percent of his work then come ,Shakespeare.
      Perfect English is not going to build this world.

  • @ratonjj
    @ratonjj 3 года назад +22

    That might be the most intresting video i have seen on youtube the last 1-2 years :)

  • @ichbrauchmehrkaffee5785
    @ichbrauchmehrkaffee5785 3 года назад +3

    the only thing that really gives away, that this is more likely real than cgi,
    are surface texture, seam lines on the plastic molded parts and the finger smudges

  • @jonathanfairchild
    @jonathanfairchild Год назад +1

    That was extremely satisfying

  • @localhost123456
    @localhost123456 3 года назад +4

    This is mindblowing!

  • @AlphaCompRepair
    @AlphaCompRepair 3 года назад +1

    why would anyone think that is CG? These kind of robots have been around for well over 30 years at this point.

    • @maulcs
      @maulcs 3 года назад +1

      People think rocket launches are CGI. People are extremely dumb.

  • @sanches2
    @sanches2 3 года назад +1

    Great work - the robots, the video and the idea - thank you!

  • @m3talh3ad18
    @m3talh3ad18 3 года назад

    Serial robot > parallel robot.
    Also I can't believe this isn't CGI 👍🏾

  • @mikeebrady
    @mikeebrady Год назад

    It'd be cool to see both doing the same routine at the same time.

  • @sanches2
    @sanches2 3 года назад

    Such videos remind me of having to study for mechanics 2 and theory of machnes and mechanisms. The second one i took with a heavy hangover but during the party we did a lot of talks and arguments about inverse kinematics and robots. Half liter of tulamore dew and a lot of pizza and 5 hours of sleep later...

  • @KoMaHu3aM
    @KoMaHu3aM 3 года назад +1

    keeping those algorithms happy...

  • @iuligie
    @iuligie 3 года назад +2

    "Epic Rap Battle of History" after robots take over the world be like

  • @stanley8006
    @stanley8006 3 года назад +1

    An Scp version of this would change the gravitational direction/rotation of a sealed room.

  • @roscogamingtv
    @roscogamingtv 3 года назад

    I genuinely came here expecting a robot fight.

  • @logix8969
    @logix8969 3 года назад +2

    That's crazy cool! And I don't think you could have picked better music to go with it! Wonder what the track is... :p

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  3 года назад +2

      Thanks a lot! 😊 I made it exclusively for this video.

    • @EgorKaskader
      @EgorKaskader 3 года назад +1

      @@OleksandrStepanenko It fits really well with the noise of the servoes, too. Excellent job all around.

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  3 года назад +1

      @@EgorKaskader Thank you, Egor!

  • @ancientmysteries3224
    @ancientmysteries3224 3 года назад +1

    это прекрасно, одобряю!

  • @joshuajaydan
    @joshuajaydan 3 года назад

    I 100% thought this was CGI.

  • @willthethrill521
    @willthethrill521 3 года назад +1

    COOOOL

  • @Kori114
    @Kori114 3 года назад

    OK. Hello, totally new to this channel. Probably answered already... What are the pneumatic/hydraulic actuators and where can I get them?!?

    • @Kori114
      @Kori114 3 года назад

      Oh I see. They're screw driven. Very nice. I love how smooth everything is.

  • @shmookins
    @shmookins 3 года назад

    "In robotics there are basically two kind of kinematics: serial and parallel. Serial robots consist of a sequence of arms whereas parallel robots take effect on the moving tool carrier directly with several prismatic joints. The resulting low moving masses enable both high dynamics and very precise mechanics."
    -autonox24.com › parallel_robot

  • @greengoat5654
    @greengoat5654 Год назад

    What's the point of the left robot? Seems like a more specific use case thing. In the stuff I know standard robotics to be used for the second robot is really the only thing that's useful, and the ability to reach is something that is important for pretty much every automation task

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  Год назад

      Parallel robots typically have a much smaller workspace compared to serial robots. Nevertheless, the lightweight design of the moving parts allows them to achieve extremely high speeds and accelerations (it's not shown in the video).

  • @timothyahkoy8202
    @timothyahkoy8202 3 года назад

    I'm trying to figure out whether its really big or really small machines

  • @cptairwolf
    @cptairwolf 3 года назад

    Great but how are they are cleaning dishes?

  • @kingwr12
    @kingwr12 3 года назад

    Why wouldn't you move them at the same time through the same translation? Seems like a missed opportunity.

  • @cupoftea3499
    @cupoftea3499 3 года назад

    I just really wonder how the left one works. Like how do they just slide on the poles?

    • @joshuakuehn
      @joshuakuehn 3 года назад

      theyre screws, look up linear screws. very common on 3d printers.

  • @stigregan7249
    @stigregan7249 3 года назад

    Hmmm. So it's not a lightsaber fight?

  • @cwk1203
    @cwk1203 Год назад

    Which will win the lightsaber fight?

  • @micah9461
    @micah9461 3 года назад

    Geometric algebra in action

  • @emissarygw2264
    @emissarygw2264 3 года назад

    these aint got nothin on a rooster

  • @anom794939393
    @anom794939393 3 года назад

    arent these two robot types incredibly disparate in cost and purpose? has anyone stuck the arm on the kinematics serial robot and made an even more axis movement arm.

  • @dfpytwa
    @dfpytwa 3 года назад

    Mount maces on them and see which one can smash the other to bits first and I might subscribe.

  • @quote.d
    @quote.d 3 года назад

    WHO WON?!?!? WHO'S NEXT!?!?!? YOU DECIDE!!!!!

  • @southern_merican
    @southern_merican 3 года назад

    Here i am thinking there is only x,y, and z axis

  • @pdbsstudios7137
    @pdbsstudios7137 3 года назад

    i think the arm is winning the battle

  • @SoulPriest
    @SoulPriest 3 года назад +838

    "oh yeah. Rotate that X-axis for me, baby."

  • @Yoctopory
    @Yoctopory 3 года назад +1417

    "What is my purpose?"
    "You rotate around an axis."
    "Oh my god.."

    • @brushfuse
      @brushfuse 3 года назад +30

      Now pass the butter.

    • @hashbrown777
      @hashbrown777 3 года назад +4

      All axes*

    • @Sharpless2
      @Sharpless2 3 года назад +8

      @@brushfuse im slightly concerned about why you need butter in this specific context.

    • @brushfuse
      @brushfuse 3 года назад +15

      @@Sharpless2 I'm sure you've 'eard about that kid's show. Now pass the butter.

    • @panzervpl9406
      @panzervpl9406 3 года назад +2

      Now go bring the butter

  • @MaksymCzech
    @MaksymCzech 4 года назад +1651

    I love the real world XYZ axes representation! :D

    • @dennyrulos4847
      @dennyrulos4847 3 года назад +16

      This is CGI right?

    • @docredstone461
      @docredstone461 3 года назад +19

      @@dennyrulos4847 i don't think

    • @MaksymCzech
      @MaksymCzech 3 года назад +25

      @@dennyrulos4847 There are "making of" backstage videos on this channel

    • @MrrChmielu
      @MrrChmielu 3 года назад +11

      @@dennyrulos4847 even if, movements like that are possible and quite easy to achieve

    • @avananana
      @avananana 3 года назад +15

      @@MrrChmielu Not even close, the accuracy of the movements here are incredible and really hard to achieve, you'd know that if you had tried it before. With pen and paper it's really easy, but to get software and real world physical movement to line up as you want it to isn't as easy.

  • @berni_schmorg
    @berni_schmorg 3 года назад +1714

    Unbelievable how incredibly still the rotation axes are!

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  3 года назад +110

      I'm shocked too 😉

    • @xxportalxx.
      @xxportalxx. 3 года назад +87

      Means he did his math right lol

    • @daklhs6460
      @daklhs6460 3 года назад +27

      @@xxportalxx. and measurements.

    • @ZlotyChannel
      @ZlotyChannel 3 года назад +9

      I dont know if it was irony, but just in case, I want to say that it is actually a render of a 3d animation

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  3 года назад +46

      @@ZlotyChannel What if not?
      ruclips.net/video/Y3xtbu5sWXU/видео.html
      instagram.com/olekstepanenko/

  • @MrSharp-yg1wb
    @MrSharp-yg1wb 3 года назад +498

    "This is not CGI" LOL
    I'm CG artist and thought at first that this was cg, and at second "damnit this guy make good renderings and engineering at the same time"))))

    • @Keys879
      @Keys879 3 года назад +67

      I'm still not convinced. The perfect shading on the backdrop and completely flat tone of the reflections and color hues makes me believe otherwise.

    • @izzulhaqmahardika8892
      @izzulhaqmahardika8892 3 года назад +20

      @@Keys879 Look at how the robots move, you can completely see that it was animated

    • @brockoala2994
      @brockoala2994 3 года назад +7

      @@Keys879 How about the shadow of the cables? When the right arm moves, the shadow of the cables of the left arm seems to react very realistically, would it be possible for CGI?

    • @Keys879
      @Keys879 3 года назад

      @@brockoala2994 ​ I'm not sure what you're referencing as not much shading changes on the left-most arm's wiring. However when i even cranked up the quality to 4k/2160p it really looks fake. Even some of the material shader goes a bit haywire lol.

    • @XStance7
      @XStance7 3 года назад +41

      @@Keys879 He is PhD and he has his own site and he is into product photography too. He is just too good at what he does so seems fake but actually, he seems legit.

  • @martinbudinsky8912
    @martinbudinsky8912 3 года назад +174

    I am honestly surprised that its not a CGI. How stable the robots are. Theres not even a slight shaking.

    • @retard1582
      @retard1582 3 года назад +20

      Have you ever seen a shakey machine in real life? something more sturdy than a 300 dollar 3D printer? I haven't.

    • @CristiNeagu
      @CristiNeagu 3 года назад +14

      You can see in the close ups that the tips of the axes are shaking a bit. Depending on application this may be a non issue. If you're doing pick and place operations, it's great. But if you're doing machining, then it's pretty bad. That's why very accurate robots cost a lot of money.

    • @DavidS-mi8nh
      @DavidS-mi8nh 3 года назад +6

      it also looks quite cgi like, soft shadows and all

    • @Tjita1
      @Tjita1 3 года назад +6

      I'm not saying that this isn't impressive, but have you ever seen a full size multi ton industrial robot at work? Some models achieve repeatability of a few hundreds of a millimeter.

    • @Condorito380
      @Condorito380 3 года назад +4

      The end of the day, engineering is tradeoffs. For these bots to move as rapidly as they do for the price point they are at, they had to sacrifice some accuracy. There are ways to mitigate this.

  • @boringpodcast
    @boringpodcast 3 года назад +48

    I’m not really sure what I am watching

  • @derkeith570
    @derkeith570 3 года назад +115

    *trap beat starts playing*
    EPIC RAP BATTLE OF HISTORY!!!
    SERIAL ROBOT
    V.S.
    PARALLEL ROBOT !!!
    *mechanical whirring noices*
    *Some more whirring*
    *Whirring sounds*
    ...
    WHO WON?!?
    WHO IS NEXT???!
    YOU DECIDE!!!!!!!!

  • @allyourcode
    @allyourcode 3 года назад +74

    This is a robot dance battle. I feel like serial bot won. Those were some sick moves. Plus, I don't think parallel but can do more than one full rotation.

    • @ThomasKundera
      @ThomasKundera 3 года назад +4

      But as in th description, the problem of serial is that motors are on the arm: so heavy, so slow.
      Parallel ones allow all the heavy elements to be motionless, thus way way faster actions.

    • @krshna77
      @krshna77 3 года назад

      @@ThomasKundera you can place all motors at the base and control via joint gears and/or pulleys. your fingers are built like this.

    • @ThomasKundera
      @ThomasKundera 3 года назад +5

      @@krshna77 : You can, but in robotic this is not very used as it's not very rigid.

    • @Komrade_juice
      @Komrade_juice 3 года назад +7

      Most serial robots also cant do more than a full rotation. This is because of wiring sent though the arm. Most even have a 30 degree or so dead zone on Axis 1.
      The only axis that could have unlimited rotation is the wrist axis (6 on a 6-axis) however you put tooling on the end of robots that need pneumatic or electrical control. So in practice all axes on a serial robot are maximum 0-360 degrees.

    • @krshna77
      @krshna77 3 года назад

      @@Komrade_juice There is a well known solution to the continuous wire limitation. A bit more complex, but reliable and well tested in brushed motors, and in 3.5mm jacks...

  • @PamdaDev
    @PamdaDev 3 года назад +99

    "This is not CGI" Made me click the video

    • @prakharmishra3000
      @prakharmishra3000 3 года назад

      Same

    • @incognitotorpedo42
      @incognitotorpedo42 3 года назад

      Me too. Does this constitute clickbait? I think maybe it does, because there was nothing unbelievable about it.

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  3 года назад +14

      I added this a few days ago because I'm tired of answering everyone that it is not CGI.

    • @corinnemuir1542
      @corinnemuir1542 3 года назад

      @@OleksandrStepanenko I tip my hat to you good sir! Very well played.

  • @BloodyMobile
    @BloodyMobile 3 года назад +85

    While the parallel 6-DOF is impressive from a mechanical view, I have a slight feeling that it's range of motion is rather short compared to the other one.
    But I was really surprised how it did the Z rotation, I thought it would just have a spin motor in the top.

    • @UhOhUmm
      @UhOhUmm 3 года назад +18

      In some places parallel is simpler and easier, also you can make it speedy. Pick and place robots are often parallel.

    • @TheZoneTakesYou
      @TheZoneTakesYou 3 года назад +5

      parallel has big torque.

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  3 года назад +44

      The workspace of the parallel robot is definitely smaller than the same size serial architecture. Parallel, however, has a number of advantages, such as extremely high speed and acceleration, high rigidity, better accuracy (depends on the architecture).

    • @markgearing
      @markgearing 3 года назад

      That would make it 7-DOF

    • @Ixions
      @Ixions 3 года назад +8

      @@OleksandrStepanenko Interesting, is seems like parallel robots would have fewer kinematic singularities and more optimal power consumption due to the use of prismatic joints but the Jacobian must be more difficult to formulate. Seems like you would end up with a differential solution?

  • @StormBurnX
    @StormBurnX 3 года назад +22

    I think this is the first time I've seen a stewart platform type machine with the axes paired up like that - for a moment, I thought it was simply a doubly-braced delta machine until the pairs moved in opposite directions for the rotation. Absolutely brilliant!

  • @maxwell_edison
    @maxwell_edison 3 года назад +25

    me before actually reading the title:
    "Wow this is pretty good CGI"

  • @TheSpacecraftX
    @TheSpacecraftX 3 года назад +17

    Google definitely spying on me. Seeing this the same day I remote interview for a software engineer at a robotics firm I see this after not looking at anything robotics related online before this week. Hmmmmm.

    • @FaceInTheCrowd
      @FaceInTheCrowd 3 года назад

      Without even a shadow of a doubt.
      Google probably knows almost as much about you as you do.

    • @BillyBob-qu1fs
      @BillyBob-qu1fs 3 года назад +1

      I used to think I was crazy for thinking like this. Friends used to tell me that too. But now it's pretty commonly accepted. Like yesterday, talked to my father about a friend starting a business. Didn't google any of it. Then that night I get ads for legalzoom and others. Doot doot doot

  • @alberth.mendrofa4068
    @alberth.mendrofa4068 3 года назад +20

    As robotic researcher myself,
    I would say the accuracy of your serial manipulator movement extremely impressive 👍🏻👍🏻

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  3 года назад +2

      It's from Mecademic: ruclips.net/video/Aagm-z4nvRo/видео.html

  • @eckee
    @eckee 3 года назад +16

    I’m waiting for new gen of parallel robots that bend instead of using moving parts and 3d printable.

    • @yochanan5257
      @yochanan5257 3 года назад

      we have no time to await for it, enjoy engineering

  • @owouwu9032
    @owouwu9032 3 года назад +13

    The international docking standard soft capture system uses 6 linear actuators in a parallel arrangement to move a ring that helps guide a spacecraft into the docking port if not perfectly aligned.

  • @BHARGAV_GAJJAR
    @BHARGAV_GAJJAR 3 года назад +23

    All the fancy robotics in this world makes me want to become a robot sigh

    • @krshna77
      @krshna77 3 года назад +1

      why would you become a robot sigh

    • @clintonbehrends4659
      @clintonbehrends4659 3 года назад

      @@krshna77
      lack of aging
      custom structure (you can be an arm or a spaceship as long as your data can be stored on it)
      no need for air
      no need for food
      no back pain
      unaffected by disease
      increasable memory
      etcetera
      etcetera

    • @stevejordan7275
      @stevejordan7275 3 года назад

      Wait.
      Just wait.
      Oh, and you might want to get some money, too. Like...as much as you can.

    • @krshna77
      @krshna77 3 года назад

      @@clintonbehrends4659 ... that way you can be the ultimate stainless steel bolt with a usb stick welded on.

    • @krshna77
      @krshna77 3 года назад

      @@stevejordan7275 Or you can participate in a draw by ordering an AmAzoN CrEdiT cArD

  • @ArunUdai
    @ArunUdai 4 года назад +12

    Excellent. I will use this to make my students understand few concepts. Thanks for this.

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  4 года назад +3

      That's great, thanks!

    • @aaroheetrenz135
      @aaroheetrenz135 4 года назад

      Arun ji.. can I please get your contact no.. or can you get in touch with me on my email id. sagar @ karbonaerospace . com

    • @ArunUdai
      @ArunUdai 4 года назад +1

      @@aaroheetrenz135 You can contact me at arun _ udai @ yahoo.com

    • @sergiocastillo1607
      @sergiocastillo1607 3 года назад

      @@ArunUdai Thank u, I wish I could contact you, I am interested in these concepts. My mail is sergioahmed16programming@gmail.com . I sent you a message

    • @ArunUdai
      @ArunUdai 3 года назад +1

      @@sergiocastillo1607 I have replied to your mail as well.

  • @LPChip
    @LPChip 3 года назад +10

    Really cool. Would love to see them run at the same time to really see how similar they are.

  • @WaynesStrangeBrain
    @WaynesStrangeBrain 4 года назад +10

    I'm generally a fan of getting good quality for cheap, but there's no mistaking it... better is better

  • @rtyuik7
    @rtyuik7 3 года назад +3

    lets just say it looks like theyre aligning for the sake of Docking Together...
    ...and thats about as kid-friendly as ima put it xD

    • @lukedavis6711
      @lukedavis6711 3 года назад

      Space docking....

    • @rtyuik7
      @rtyuik7 3 года назад

      @@lukedavis6711 "yes, Ted, that was the joke" :-P
      (actually, im just glad someone else got it xD)

  • @soupedenuit
    @soupedenuit 3 года назад +26

    The fact that people would think that this is CGI says a lot about how advanced CGI technology has become. If this was CGI it would be even more impressive than the robot tech displayed here.

    • @no3ironman11100
      @no3ironman11100 3 года назад +3

      To be fair the room this is filmed in is also lit in a weird way that reminds of CGI using simple lighting. It's not really CGI being advanced as it is the way it's recorded making it seem "low quality" in a way

  • @GUMMY_MKII
    @GUMMY_MKII 3 года назад +5

    It's rare to see the Z axis represented vertically
    Even though it's less popular, I prefer this way.

    • @8thlvlMage
      @8thlvlMage 3 года назад +1

      Unreal Engine and Zbrush use Z as the up axis. I'm sure there are more, but those are massively used software.

    • @GUMMY_MKII
      @GUMMY_MKII 3 года назад

      @@8thlvlMage
      Oh I didn't know about ZBrush!
      That makes it easier to import/export to Blender / Unreal

  • @whytushar
    @whytushar 3 года назад +11

    Got it in my recommendation, am not disappointed

  • @CostlyFiddle
    @CostlyFiddle 3 года назад +3

    I saw more accuracy from the 6 axis Series robot. The rotation of the Parallel Robot wasn't as precise. Still super cool!

  • @basbekjenl
    @basbekjenl 3 года назад +2

    Weird how the algorithm just chooses a video like this out of the blue, I've seen the robot on the right plenty of times it seems to be a pretty commonly used assembly robot. The robot on the left is intriguing because it can do the same task but appears in my eyes to be much more modularly adjustable and variable. I say the left robot is better then the right one.

    • @BillyBob-qu1fs
      @BillyBob-qu1fs 3 года назад

      I would disagree in cases where you need to reach in/over/through something. Like putting a steering wheel on a car the left one might have issues. But where you can use it I would agree it seems much better.

  • @normad88
    @normad88 3 года назад +5

    I love how he had to put "This is not CGI" in the title.

  • @carazy123_
    @carazy123_ Год назад +2

    Bro, the demonstration is very cool on its own, but the music is fire
    It’s got the BWAAHHHHH and everything

  • @Mechobree
    @Mechobree 3 года назад +3

    this is mighty impressive, but something about the vibe of this video makes it feel like robot porn

  • @treytrey6011
    @treytrey6011 Год назад +3

    So impressive! It was very important to me to show both formats running directly next to each other. It wouldn't have made as much sense if you had shown them on sequentially one after the other. I wouldn't be able to hold them both in working memory. Great job!

  • @Julian-of3qj
    @Julian-of3qj 4 месяца назад +1

    Amazing! Would've loved some more info: which one is superior in terms of price-performance? Are they interchangeable or used for different tasks?
    Thx

  • @railgap
    @railgap 3 года назад +3

    As an engineer who is much more comfortable in the machine shop than writing code (hint: I don't actually code, unless shell scripts count, LOL) it is the software driving these beautiful little machines - keeping track of the geometric center of the model and doing the complex geometry to calculate the necessary motions... mad respect just cuz I can't do it!

  • @IllIlllI
    @IllIlllI 3 года назад +3

    Rule34: „and I took that personally!“

  • @bDwS27
    @bDwS27 3 года назад +2

    Kinematics has visible z axis runout.
    Quite a lot too

  • @сашагемберг
    @сашагемберг 3 года назад +3

    *_Чётко!!!_* 🙄🙄🙄😎😎😎😎😎😎

  • @oldrageface8706
    @oldrageface8706 3 года назад +1

    Are you tired of three dimensional life? Take a relaxing vacation of a lifetime to the point! Free yourself from the stress of the 3 dimensions. DOWN WITH THE AXIS POWERS!!

  • @EEGBiofeedback
    @EEGBiofeedback 3 года назад +4

    Oh Man this is brilliant!!! Thanks for sharing.

  • @morrellman93
    @morrellman93 4 месяца назад +1

    Epic Rap Battles of HISTORYYYYY!! Serial Robot..... VS........Parallel Roboooooooot.....BEGIN!

  • @Scudmaster11
    @Scudmaster11 5 лет назад +5

    parallel wins

  • @mapetlv
    @mapetlv 3 года назад +22

    spoiler: it WAS cgi.

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  3 года назад +1

      This is not CGI:
      ruclips.net/video/Y3xtbu5sWXU/видео.html
      instagram.com/olekstepanenko/

    • @hessery5418
      @hessery5418 3 года назад

      @@OleksandrStepanenko Yeah but the cameras look cgi too. Show us your hands in a video, then i might believe you.

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  3 года назад

      @@hessery5418 Here you are:
      ruclips.net/video/MvEpi4FDhuI/видео.html
      ruclips.net/video/igo5p5ktp0k/видео.html

  • @ManyHeavens42
    @ManyHeavens42 3 года назад +1

    They have to move like humans ,To work and live together,Such as body Guards ,We need them today ,no Yesterday.on the Moon ,in the sky ,On the Ground. Innovations always key.and price!
    Nano tubing needs no gears. Lightweight stronger than steel.

  • @karlpittman9925
    @karlpittman9925 3 года назад +5

    I read "serial" robot, and was really concerned one was going to be disassembled beyond recognition. I'm glad no robots were harmed in the making of this video.

  • @Spexx368
    @Spexx368 4 месяца назад +1

    From the way the lighting is setup to how clean and shiny some stuff is. It looks like a really good blender animation but Ik it’s real

  • @SpaceMissile
    @SpaceMissile 3 года назад +3

    I'M MAKING THE JOKE I'M GONNA DO IT
    netflix: 'are you still watching?' somebody's daughter: 0:32
    I HAVE ACHIEVED COMEDY

  • @Khairoullin
    @Khairoullin 3 года назад +3

    Впечатляет!

  • @andg4512
    @andg4512 3 года назад +3

    Охренительно )

  • @fitlife6965
    @fitlife6965 4 года назад +3

    from your name i feel that you're ukranian

  • @anuragmaurya7118
    @anuragmaurya7118 3 года назад +1

    NETFLIX : *Are you still watching?*
    Someone's Daughter: 00:47

  • @glitch0041
    @glitch0041 3 года назад +3

    Not CGI, just computer generated imagery. LOL

  • @paulmeynell8866
    @paulmeynell8866 4 месяца назад +1

    What would you need the different types for? Only seen the arm type before this is very impressive.

  • @zeffofx
    @zeffofx 5 лет назад +3

    oh, they can mimic a chicken's head

  • @737Garrus
    @737Garrus Год назад +2

    I can't believe this isn't CGI. 107% incredible!

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  Год назад

      Thanks! See also the Behind the Scenes video: ruclips.net/video/Y3xtbu5sWXU/видео.html

  • @harsh9558
    @harsh9558 3 года назад +3

    This looks so awesome

  • @jordanhyde2752
    @jordanhyde2752 3 года назад +1

    How is this even real????? It looks CGI and it’s confusing my brain lol

  • @spencerlukay5809
    @spencerlukay5809 3 года назад +3

    “What is my purpose?”
    You translate and rotate about 3 axes.
    “Oh my god”

  • @Zer0Blizzard
    @Zer0Blizzard Год назад +1

    "This is not CGI" but like bruh the lighting is purposely set up to look like it and there's no normal everyday objects in the shot or anything remotely human

  • @abnnuy9999
    @abnnuy9999 3 года назад +2

    Government's Military Division: Great. Now when can we weaponize this?

    • @indeepjable
      @indeepjable 3 года назад

      Obviously The Most Logical Thought In My Opinion Would Be Turrets Or Guns That Can Go In All Directions

  • @unknown6656
    @unknown6656 3 года назад +2

    Not sure if CGI or not ......
    It it is CGI, well done! These are perfect renders!
    If not, then you've got a wonderful way of filming and presenting stuff!

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  3 года назад +1

      Thank you! It's filming: instagram.com/olekstepanenko/

    • @unknown6656
      @unknown6656 3 года назад +1

      ​@@OleksandrStepanenko Oh wow, that is truly impressive!! You have certainly earned my subscription!
      The robot's perfect motion, the elegance (yet simplicity, i.e. no stray wires etc.), the cleanness of the scene, the lighting and music really gave me the impression of a CGI render.
      I have two questions:
      - Which camera model are you using?
      - Is your soundtrack available for personal (non-public) use?
      Keep up the excellent work!

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  3 года назад +1

      @@unknown6656 Thank you very much! I really appreciate your comments, thank you for noticing all these small details, great to know it matters! I use Sony a6300 and a6500 4K cameras. I didn't publish soundtracks, but I recommend you try Logic pro software or at least GarageBand (it's free) from Apple and you can do a lot more than this.

    • @unknown6656
      @unknown6656 3 года назад +1

      @@OleksandrStepanenko Thank you very much for the reply! I'll give GarageBand a shot, however, I doubt that I'll be able to produce tracks as fantastic as yours.

  • @lanemiller08
    @lanemiller08 Год назад +1

    Is this your own Gough-Stewart platform? I've been wanting to tinker with one with the plans to scale up for a motion simulator chair. Unbelievably simple looking device for 6dof

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  Год назад +1

      Yes, it's mine :) It shouldn't be too complicated, especially if it's a prototype. For a motion simulator, it should be a little different, but still not too complicated.

  • @ALEET
    @ALEET Год назад +1

    why does this feel like a robot beef

  • @Osigot
    @Osigot 4 месяца назад +1

    At first I thought “this is a 3D demo,” and then I read the title of the video ...

  • @Turb0esky
    @Turb0esky Год назад +2

    I was hoping for an epic robot light saber duel.

  • @3yyubi
    @3yyubi 3 года назад +2

    Fellow robotics engineer here,
    Love how do motor sounds mix like as if they are actually part of the bg music. Very inspirational.

    • @OleksandrStepanenko
      @OleksandrStepanenko  3 года назад +1

      Great to know that! Thank you! By the way, the sound is one of the reasons why I used steppers in this project.

  • @lazarblazar265
    @lazarblazar265 3 года назад +2

    Dunno why i got this recommended but its SO DAMN COOL
    Ironically, just started studying Robotics and Automation this semester.
    Cheers for the content mate :D