@yolandabrinkman2653 holidays is just a term for the Christmas period, there are other religions in this country other than Christianity you know? I hope your enjoying your Christmas instead of policing other people's words. Merry Christmas. Also I'm British m8
Good Morning Majesty KING CHARLES III ❤️ London ❤️ huge support, lot of kisses, whishing you an excellent préparation for Christmas Ève. MERRY CHRISTMAS, god Bless Royal Family
Sorry to break it to you, but Christmas is as pagan and evil and holidays get! In fact Scripture is pretty clear that we aren't to celebrate as the pagans ...and Yahusha wasn't born in winter....
Its about Jesus.He is the only one who died to save us and our good works cant so no matter how much people are good they will never be saved by that because our sin is the issue.They shall call Him Jesus for He shall save His people from their sins.
@@lobotobot154 Yes but this is an exert from the King's speech 'As the famous Christmas Carol, ‘Once In Royal David’s City’ reminds us, ‘Our Saviour holy’ ‘came down to Earth from Heaven’, lived among ‘the poor and mean and lowly’ and transformed the lives of those he met, through God’s ‘redeeming love' It's about Christmas not Hanukkah. Jews don't believe in Jesus.
TIME TO GO! time to go! 1. The royals cost a lot more than publicly declared, at least £510m a year. 2. The true cost includes the sovereign grant, which itself is set to rise by £45m a year. 3. The cost includes lost revenues from the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster, which the record shows are state assets at the disposal of parliament, not the private property of the Windsor family. 4. The Sovereign Grant is funded wholly by the government, not the Crown Estate. The Crown Estate is a state asset, created in 1960 to manage some Crown (state) lands, but it’s only been since 2011 that it has been used as a smokescreen for royal expenditure, by artificially linking the grant to Crown Estate profits. 5. The huge and growing cost of the royals is primarily due to personal and private costs, such as an excessive number of homes, avoidance of large tax bills and private incomes being drawn from the duchies. 6. Using or abusing public office for private gain is a form of corruption, and this corruption is why the monarchy costs so much. Secrecy, dishonesty and deference all feed a culture of impunity and entitlement. 7. Comparable heads of state cost as little as £5m a year, excluding security. 8. There is no evidence to support claims of an economic benefit from having the monarchy. 9. The cost of the monarchy should and could be slashed to just £5-10m a year, while these revelations should help fuel a debate about abolition of the monarchy in favour of a democratic and accountable alternative. Reform and abolish Republic is calling for short-term royal funding reforms with a view to a longer-term debate on abolition. Those reforms include: 1. Scrap the Sovereign Grant. 2. Provide a budget of £5-10m a year, to provide an office and staff for the head of state. 3. Provide a salary for Charles of £189,000 and peg any increases to that of the prime minister. This figure is 110% of the prime minister’s salary. 4. Roll all Duchy assets into the Crown Estate and rename the estate the National Estate, changing the law to make public ownership explicit. 5. Limit Charles to two homes that the state will provide security and staff for, one in central London and one in the countryside. This will bring the head of state into line with the prime minister. 6. Scrap all provision of homes or funding for all other members of the royal family. Ensure all royals have the same tax obligations as everyone else. 7. End all royal exemptions from the Freedom of Information Act and include the royal household and the royal archives in the scope of the Act in relation to official communications, documents and records. 8. Hold an honest and public inquiry into royal finances and spending, one which has full access to all records going back as far as necessary. 9. Take royal financial reporting out of the hands of the palace and ensure comparisons with similar heads of state are included in any reports. These reforms are proposed with a longer-term view of achieving the abolition of the monarchy in favour of a democratic alternative. Only by having an accountable head of state can we put an end to this abuse of public money. Summary of the annual cost of the royals £m Expenditure from Sovereign Grant and Surplus 108.9 State buildings used by royal family 96.3 Duchy of Cornwall profits/gains - lost 65.3 Duchy of Lancaster profits/gains - lost 33.8 Royal Collection net surplus - lost 11.8 Cost to local councils 31.9 Security 150.0 Costs met by Government Departments and the Crown Estate 7.5 Bona vacantia proceeds - Duchy of Cornwall 0.1 Bona vacantia proceeds - Duchy of Lancaster 4.8 Total cost 510.4 MILLION POUNDS A YEAR
Give me a constitutional monarchy over an elected head of state. Look at the US, a TV personality is their Head of State. I can't think of anything worse for Great Britain
It's all lies, I bet they truly don't even really own that place it was about stolen like everything else. That maybe why they all have cancer dying off because of theirs lies and deceitfulness. I wish that on no one. However, you get back what you dish out in the universe. So maybe if you let God's children go you all wouldn't be enduring what you are going through. I still hope and pray 🙏 that you all be blessed n safe always 🙏
He hasn't stolen it or own it! It's a church that was part of a hospital, it's used by a community and was a lovely place to make a Christmas speech especially as he wanted to give thanks to Doctors and nurses who attended him and HRH Catherine, Princess of Wales.
@@gloriawhiting5431 I'm speaking on what they do own and the position they hold as a king. Is what I was referring too. So again lies because they stole all of the land and riches from the Native American the indigenous people who truly owns everything so talk what you know or maybe you should have asked question before you responded ma'am or sir whoever you are
When? Part of the King's speech 'As the famous Christmas Carol, ‘Once In Royal David’s City’ reminds us, ‘Our Saviour holy’ ‘came down to Earth from Heaven’, lived among ‘the poor and mean and lowly’ and transformed the lives of those he met, through God’s ‘redeeming love" I see no difficulties.
It's called A Christmas message.
The 'United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ' is a Christian Nation.
Enough with this holiday stuff!!!!
No it's a nation of deviants
Split from actual christianity to practice adultery and homosexuality
Weve called it holidays for 100s of years catch up
@TotalAlchemy "catch up" yourselves. The title of the speech is Christmas, not thanksgiving. And it is a British tradition not American
@yolandabrinkman2653 holidays is just a term for the Christmas period, there are other religions in this country other than Christianity you know? I hope your enjoying your Christmas instead of policing other people's words. Merry Christmas. Also I'm British m8
@TotalAlchemy 25th December is Christmas Day. As a non Christian, I support Christmas Day. You know????
The title to this podcast is incorrect. It is not a thanksgiving message. The british monarch is giving the traditional annual Christmas message
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas, Good Morning America!
“We have no sovereign but God, and no king but Christ!” -John Adams
Good Morning Majesty KING CHARLES III ❤️ London ❤️ huge support, lot of kisses, whishing you an excellent préparation for Christmas Ève. MERRY CHRISTMAS, god Bless Royal Family
Marry Christmas
CHRISTMAS NOT HOLIDAY
Pretty sure Christmas is a holy day buddy
Sorry to break it to you, but Christmas is as pagan and evil and holidays get!
In fact Scripture is pretty clear that we aren't to celebrate as the pagans
...and Yahusha wasn't born in winter....
Christmas
Merry Christmas 🎅 🎄
It’s Christmas NOT holiday.
Its been called holidays for 100s of years catch up
Thank you for saying Christmas
It makes me so hurt & upset when people throw dirt in the eyes of Christians
@@TotalAlchemythere’s nothing to “catch up” to. You’re wrong.
@@davidpar2 I'm wrong about the observable fact that we've used "holidays" for decades, which we have.
But the late Queen did her Christmas message from various places OTHER than Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle! Nothing new.
Its about Jesus.He is the only one who died to save us and our good works cant so no matter how much people are good they will never be saved by that because our sin is the issue.They shall call Him Jesus for He shall save His people from their sins.
Merry Christmas to America HUGE love from England UK ♥♥♥
How about calling it a Christmas message.
Hanukkah takes place in December too, it encompasses two major annual celebrations
@@lobotobot154 Yes but this is an exert from the King's speech 'As the famous Christmas Carol, ‘Once In Royal David’s City’ reminds us, ‘Our Saviour holy’ ‘came down to Earth from Heaven’, lived among ‘the poor and mean and lowly’ and transformed the lives of those he met, through God’s ‘redeeming love'
It's about Christmas not Hanukkah. Jews don't believe in Jesus.
A very heartfelt and elequent speech from our lovely King . God bless King Charles and keep him well 🙏
Lovely or out of touch? Unlike us, his fam have heavy expensive security to protect them from the diversity he thinks is so awesome. 😢
So why did they change it
King Charles III delivers a pizza .
So where is the transcrpt of the Kings annual Christmas message. Clickbait
holiday message? What is that?
TIME TO GO!
time to go!
1. The royals cost a lot more than publicly declared, at least £510m a year.
2. The true cost includes the sovereign grant, which itself is set to rise by £45m a year.
3. The cost includes lost revenues from the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster, which the record shows are state assets at the disposal of parliament, not the private property of the Windsor family.
4. The Sovereign Grant is funded wholly by the government, not the Crown Estate. The Crown Estate is a state asset, created in 1960 to manage some Crown (state) lands, but it’s only been since 2011 that it has been used as a smokescreen for royal expenditure, by artificially linking the grant to Crown Estate profits.
5. The huge and growing cost of the royals is primarily due to personal and private costs, such as an excessive number of homes, avoidance of large tax bills and private incomes being drawn from the duchies.
6. Using or abusing public office for private gain is a form of corruption, and this corruption is why the monarchy costs so much. Secrecy, dishonesty and deference all feed a culture of impunity and entitlement.
7. Comparable heads of state cost as little as £5m a year, excluding security.
8. There is no evidence to support claims of an economic benefit from having the monarchy.
9. The cost of the monarchy should and could be slashed to just £5-10m a year, while these revelations should help fuel a debate about abolition of the monarchy in favour of a democratic and accountable alternative.
Reform and abolish
Republic is calling for short-term royal funding reforms with a view to a longer-term debate on abolition. Those reforms include:
1. Scrap the Sovereign Grant.
2. Provide a budget of £5-10m a year, to provide an office and staff for the head of state.
3. Provide a salary for Charles of £189,000 and peg any increases to that of the prime minister. This figure is 110% of the prime minister’s salary.
4. Roll all Duchy assets into the Crown Estate and rename the estate the National Estate, changing the law to make public ownership explicit.
5. Limit Charles to two homes that the state will provide security and staff for, one in central London and one in the countryside. This will bring the head of state into line with the prime minister.
6. Scrap all provision of homes or funding for all other members of the royal family. Ensure all royals have the same tax obligations as everyone else.
7. End all royal exemptions from the Freedom of Information Act and include the royal household and the royal archives in the scope of the Act in relation to official communications, documents and records.
8. Hold an honest and public inquiry into royal finances and spending, one which has full access to all records going back as far as necessary.
9. Take royal financial reporting out of the hands of the palace and ensure comparisons with similar heads of state are included in any reports.
These reforms are proposed with a longer-term view of achieving the abolition of the monarchy in favour of a democratic alternative. Only by having an accountable head of state can we put an end to this abuse of public money.
Summary of the annual cost of the royals
£m
Expenditure from Sovereign Grant and Surplus 108.9
State buildings used by royal family 96.3
Duchy of Cornwall profits/gains - lost 65.3
Duchy of Lancaster profits/gains - lost 33.8
Royal Collection net surplus - lost 11.8
Cost to local councils 31.9
Security 150.0
Costs met by Government Departments and the Crown Estate 7.5
Bona vacantia proceeds - Duchy of Cornwall 0.1
Bona vacantia proceeds - Duchy of Lancaster 4.8
Total cost 510.4 MILLION POUNDS A YEAR
Their institution made the most money for the Brits - so its a positive result highly! Tourism and everything did it cause people want to follow them.
France has the most tourists and guess what happened to their monarchy?
@@DELottProductions and today is a good time to remember what happened to the mafia family called the romanovs..
@@awwpaw4797 VISIT BRITAIN has officially said that the 'royals' generate NO MONEY for Britain. NIL TOURISM.
Give me a constitutional monarchy over an elected head of state. Look at the US, a TV personality is their Head of State. I can't think of anything worse for Great Britain
It's all lies, I bet they truly don't even really own that place it was about stolen like everything else. That maybe why they all have cancer dying off because of theirs lies and deceitfulness. I wish that on no one. However, you get back what you dish out in the universe. So maybe if you let God's children go you all wouldn't be enduring what you are going through. I still hope and pray 🙏 that you all be blessed n safe always 🙏
He hasn't stolen it or own it! It's a church that was part of a hospital, it's used by a community and was a lovely place to make a Christmas speech especially as he wanted to give thanks to Doctors and nurses who attended him and HRH Catherine, Princess of Wales.
@@gloriawhiting5431 I'm speaking on what they do own and the position they hold as a king. Is what I was referring too. So again lies because they stole all of the land and riches from the Native American the indigenous people who truly owns everything so talk what you know or maybe you should have asked question before you responded ma'am or sir whoever you are
Oh, now it’s called “Holiday message”… I get it…
Just like Boston tea party. Never a very precise description of reality
He’s in Hospital?!?
No, he's at a formal hospital chapel that is now used as a community centre
❤
WHY DOES HE FIND TO HARD SAY THE LORD'S NAME?
When? Part of the King's speech 'As the famous Christmas Carol, ‘Once In Royal David’s City’ reminds us, ‘Our Saviour holy’ ‘came down to Earth from Heaven’, lived among ‘the poor and mean and lowly’ and transformed the lives of those he met, through God’s ‘redeeming love"
I see no difficulties.
@emj3161 Whether you believe it or not, the man is pure evil.
😂😂😂
Mwu bhaasaa vividha unaa aluth givisuma nisaa aluth givisuma thami mwu bhaashaa magin mavak thora gath bavata sakciya
Fake cancer
He looks worse than last year.
THE ONLY KING WE KNOW IS JESUS CHRIST, THIS GUY IS MORTAL GUYS...COME ON...
🥱He on a different planet
We know what his Christmas message will be give me more tax payers money
Same old same old crap