It's sad that our governments would be willing to spend billions of dollars on trying to find another suitable planet for human life, yet they don't want to invest money into saving the planet we already call home.
Even IF climate change is not a thing, we would still need to find another planet to ensure the survival of life. Life in the universe is too rare to not make contingencies against mass extinctions that have soared the planet time and time again. Now that we actually have the potential to achieve it, why waste the opportunity? Because of ignorant old people like you? Lol
For something like this to happen, we would need to be able to unite as one, which is something that we’ve been failing at doing since the start of our existence because of cultural or territorial conflicts. One single entity (as big as it is) wouldn’t be able to tackle the issue by itself, we need to unite our knowledge and power. This thought is, I think, incredibly scary, as most of the conflicts happening around the world are of extreme complexity and deeply rooted in our history, some of which started centuries ago. There’s not one ultimate solution to bring peace to everybody, and it seems like there is no solution at all due to the complexity of our issues... I truly believe that space exploration is one of the only way humanity could come to the realization that we actually are one thing, in the grand scale of the universe.
Fun fact: if aliens on Kepler-22b looked at Earth right now, they would see us in Middle Ages (more specifically, during Polish-Teutonic War of 1410-1412)
@@bibekdas7449 light takes 635 years to go from Earth to Kepler-22b. That means, that light they would be observing now, is light that was emitted in 1400's.
@@bibekdas7449 Light year= distance light can travel In one year It's 600some light years away Meaning that the light we get from it and it gets from us is 600some years old. For example the sun is 8 light minutes away, meaning that we are always seeing it 8 minutes later than it actually is. So if the sun was to turn completely black for some reason, we wouldn't know for 8 minutes straight
its light years..we will never travel at the speed of light. how do you pilot such spaceship? you would crash into a star, a planet, asteroid, or some other object in cosmos within couple of seconds. so forget about getting there in 635 years. make it at least double. to 1270 years, at best.. probably more, like 5000 years, because you have to travel at managable speed to get anywhere.
If the spacecraft traveled at the speed of light, the trip for the astronauts would be instantaneous as time completely slows down for the travelers. But for us on earth 635 years would’ve passed.
@@Chris-tq1jy Yes, that’s called the theory of relativity. Kepler 22-b is 600ly away. If it took 635yrs to get there, they were near the speed of light - keeping in line with the speed of light not being possible. The show is from Ridley Scott, they had some variant of Hypersleep. The show was just so weird and interesting, i was really disappointed when it was cancelled.
What’s funny is that we’re only seeing what it looks like 635 years ago I mean it’s remarkable that we might have another place to live But at the same time what it looks like now is something we will never know for another 635 years
The interesting thing is that if we were living on Kepler 22b instead of earth, we would likely never achieve spaceflight due to gravity and the energy needed to get to orbit.
@empty stupid? All he said was to take care of our planet because the likely hood of other habitual planets inside our solar system is near impossible,yes we should search but yes,but for now we must take care and preserve for our for now future generations towards what we have,maybe the resources wouldn't be dried up if humans can learn to preserve more,even if we find a cool planet out there is nearly millions of light-years away,so yes,take care for what we have now
If NASA finally finds an exoplanet that is exactly like earth which have life on it, we still don't know if it stayed the same because what we're seeing in outer space have happened in the past.
Yes, the telescope is seeing light as it was, the light takes along time to reach the telescope depending on the distance, same goes for the human eye. When we look out at the stars, we're basically looking back in time, because the light from these stars are very far away and all distances too.
It’s crazy that what we’re able to tell is from data that’s 635 years old, and if we could leave tomorrow & travel at light speed, ANOTHER 635 years would go by, making a total of 1,270 years gone by.
Not true, you can't travel at speed of light and if you travel just close to the speed of light the trip will be shorter than 635 years on the traveller's clock. In fact it can be scaled down to near zero depending how close to c the traveller gets.
I like how a majority of the video is background information 90% of the audience already knows and 10% is the actual title what a very quality video I’m very entertained
Hold on a second... This planet is over 600 light-years from Earth, so basically this means we're seeing it like it was 600 years ago, so the planet might not even be there anymore, right?
0:00 / 9:10 •Could this be Earth 2.0 1:10 / 9:10 • Exoplanets 4:10 / 9:10 • Kepler 22-b might have an ocean 6:30 / 9:10 • Growing plants 8:14 / 9:10 • How would we thrive? I literally watched all of your videos. Suggestion. What if planets lost their rings and moons.
If someone travelled in a spaceship at the speed of light, for them they would arrive at Kepler 22-b in an instant. Travelling 635 light years would feel like less time than snapping your fingers, but in Earth time it would be 635 years. A little slower in the spaceship and it would be like just a few hours or minutes. This is because of time dilation and Einstein's theory of relativity. This also eliminates the need for 635 years of hibernation and life support.
I don't think that's exactly correct. Travelling at the speed of light means you would take the same amount of time it takes light to get there. Light takes 635 years to get there - in REAL time, not relativistic time. Which means it would take YOU 635 years to get there and it would feel like 635 years for you. In order to experience the sort of time dilation effect you're alluding to, one would have to travel SLOWER than (but close to) the speed of light. Which means, for example, if you were travelling at 0.5 times the speed of light, it would theoretically take you 1,270 years to get there (from your frame of reference) but from the point of view of the rest of the universe (i.e. Earth) much much longer than 1,270 years will pass before you get there.
I think you're right because the moment we step into light-speed spacecraft our frame of reference will change and earth's 635 years will no longer be our 635 years. Since reference changed, time will be somewhat different. Like the movie Interstellar where they spend one hour on other plant(and feel 1 hour only) but on earth, 7 year passes.
Jesus, that means you'd have to say goodbye to your family members for good, because the light travel will get you there pretty quick, but hundreds of years will pass and they'll all be long dead.
This is so great to learn about.. Can you believe it..?? 635 light-years... ?? Unbelievable far away... But still.. In a cosmical scale... Its just "a few blocks" away from earth....
In an environment with a stronger gravitational pull, you wouldn't want to "bulk-up," you would want to bulk-down. Bulking-up will only add to your mass, and make you even heavier. And if Kepler is as much as 2x gravity, it would be pretty much impossible to live on that planet. Upon arrival, your heart would have difficulty pumping blood, since your blood would weigh twice as much. Standing would be difficult, stroke would be likely, and breathing would be labored.
I once read that the maximum gravitational field humans could survive long-term is four-and-a-half times the gravity on Earth. Anything over 5 g's we would pass out and ultimately die.
The problems I listed above are survivable in the short term. Meaning, upon arrival on Kepler, you'd experience these problems, but could survive for weeks, maybe months before finally succumbing to systemic organ failure. At 5x gravity, you'd have only minutes.
Those planets are so large compared to Earth that once on the surface, we would no longer be able to get off the planet due to the gravitational pull. Your weight would be too much to bare and your bones would break.. I'm sure that if there are life forms on that planet, they would be extremely tough compared to earth life, and would probably be a whole lot stronger than us.
2, to 2.5 times gravity would not break your bones if that was the case then the spinning carnival ride, roller coasters, and fighter jets would kill or severely injure people constantly
@A Shot of Hennessy can you do your research properly? It has a gravity of acceleration at 17.36 M/S compared to Earth's which is at 9.807 M/S so keppler 2b is about 90 percent more in gravity or 1.9G of acceleration on you. It's much less than a roller coaster which could go at 4Gs
Remember when there was a petition to give Kepler 22-b the name "Namek"? Kinda wish it went through, even if mainly because I don't understand why most exoplanets/stars never get proper names at all.
@@sailordolly Yeah, and one of the rules they have is that a name can't be copyrighted. That's why the petition was rejected. So that particular case is understandable. It just annoys me that they *so rarely* name anything.
I love this channel, this channel is what got me into learning more about space, space is realy cool thanks, and keep up the good, not good AMAZING work
I just came across your channel and I'm a third of the way through the video and I am absolutely loving the energy in your voice and the video quality/editing is amazing! You have a new subscriber! Have a good day bro and thank you!
Great 😃 I am finally back at RUclips and all my old contents. These were the only things I used to watch back in 2019 and 2020. Really feel nostalgic now!
In fact, other planets have already been found, much more "hospitable" for humans, where people will be able to live in the future. I can't say about whether they are further or closer than Kepler, but I confidently remember the studies that show that it is better there. When people invent a working way to travel in space fast enough, we will obviously fly to the wrong place. But, it was great to learn that scientists have finally developed cryo sleep for humans! I still thought it was all fantastic. Well, that's cool. This will be very useful to future space travelers, because their ships are unlikely to develop a speed much higher than the speed of light, as it seems to me, and they will need to somehow survive during their journey.
When we have interstellar travel in practical time scales planets won't even matter anymore. We'll build artificial "earths" from asteroids by making oneil cylinders. You can make something stupid like trillions of these iirc. We also have the option for things like the rings halo (bishop rings) and shell worlds/matrioshka worlds which are terraformed planets containing multiple layers all of which have earth gravity. Habitable planets likely won't matter very much in the far future with advances in technology.
I have a question: If/since James Webb Telescope can capture pictures from that distance, can't it take close up shots of nearby stars or planets with great details? Like the way we do with our phones?
James webb isn't a camera. It's scans the infrared light and than we take that data and form computer simulations from that data and form an opinion on what it may look like. So every computer simulation or picture that you see is just an estimated guess. We have no true idea what it looks like unless we actually see it.
@@unclerico1106wow. Thanks. But I want to believe those within our solar system are real pics and vidoes since they're so much relatively nearer. I mean Mars, Jupiter, Sun etc
@@Tirelesswarrior actually I don't know if that's actually true or not I've read and heard it actually pretty hard to take pictures of other plants in our solar system. Our suns light asteroids and dust can hinder our abilities to take a decent picture. That's why we use this method.
What would intelligent life look like in a place that has constant daylight? It's never night. They never saw the stars except the sun. Do they even imagine that the universe exists?
Such of planet I don't think is habitable.,beceause it must orbit a red dwarf star.,and such of stars almost destroy a planet, beceause eliminates huge flares and radation's.
@@stefanrafa1348 and plus if it's never night that side of the planet would never take time to cool down thus likely overheating even if the sun would only apply 15⁰C due to the continuous heat applied to it. Not to mention, the other side would be inhabitedly cold due to having no heat applied from the sun at all.
@@aleekscribblerofdeydras9036 Day and night is not an exact line There is a transition between day and night Maybe life is in the twilight zone Where the sun is always low in the sky or barely below the horizon And the temperatures is in the right zone not too cold or too hot Just the right tempeture. And if it had a atmosphere the heat would reach the night side
WHAT IF......we could terraform Venus and Mars? What would the evolution or plants, animals, and humans would be? How would they differ? What are the pros and cons of being a 3 planet species? Would this help advance our space programs? Who would run the planets? Would they be 1 world government or many countries like Earth?
Venus greenhouse conditions would be too hard to change. Mars problem would be re-establishing it’s magneto sphere that’s crucial to prevent solar winds from stripping the atmosphere.
JJ I know the process well let's say theoretical ways as of now to terraform a planet. But there's multiple theories on how to do it, as in Venus's case you need to cool down the planet 1st, so maybe we could build something to reflect most of the sunlight that hits the planet itself, or there are chemicals we could add that would help the cool down process, there's ways of filtering certain chemicals (carbon) out of the air. The list goes on and on how to terraform a planet such as Mars and Venus but I'm saying what if we could it through magic or science or whatever Im just theoretically saying what if we could do it. Thank you What If Channel for seeing the multiple questions here and not just how to terraform the planet
I would hope Kepler22b is a water world, but with tiny islands to set camp and have solid ground under our feed. Just like RL-Kamino, just like in Star Wars Episode 2. Seems to be the best option to live.
we dont know what will happen and if will happen when someone will be able to travel with that speed. We know theory , but no one knows what will happen. Maybe if we will get this speed thing that was that fast will collapse on itself or something. We Think we know all about science, but science is all about what we DONT know.
@@dicerosautismambient4894 If that planet is going to be our home it's not going to happen in our lifetime. We don't even have the technology of lightspeed to get their! We can't even get a human on Mars! How do we know if this planet doesn't already have intelligent life or will try to kill us thinking we're intruders?
Very neat video, love thinking of this stuff. If we could travel at the speed of light, those on board would not experience passage of time, while 600 years would have passed on Earth during the trip. But we can't travel at the speed of light, so if we could accelerate at 1g continuously, about 12 years would pass on board. Not an insignificant amount of time, and cryogenic freezing is a good idea, but significant;y less than 600 years.
you ever heard of the secret space program we have starships going to distant planets talking to manny difrent races of people the annunaki live on planet nibiru in a parrellet universe they were on this planet before humans were there are over a hundred races of aliens visiting this planet now but its kept secret by the cabal
People forget that a super earth would have 2x+ earth gravity, meaning we'd take thousands of years to adapt, working out wouldn't do it. All life there would be adapted, and be super strong and dense, probably making them dangerous. You'd probably walk down like the Prometheus crew with no bio suits too.
@@patricj951 I was generalizing but makes sense with the size difference shown, provided the density is the same or similar. Actually now I wonder if size the right measurement to use. If the core and mantle proportions are different than earth, the density would be way different. A proportionately smaller core with more mantle would make it less dense, and vice versa for a larger core. In that way, the gravity would be impossible to predict.
Good video!! Only it won’t take 635 years for those traveling to Kepler 22B, because when you travel at the speed of light, time stops, so you won’t really experience any passage of time. But for those observers watching you travel, it’ll take 635 to see you arrive.
Indeed. Many do not get the relativity part. Or forget about it. Then comes the guy "but you can't travel at the speed of light" - fine, then 99.9999999 so it would take 5 seconds (experienced by the travelers) to travel at that speed. The only meaningful flight time experienced would be the time it takes to accelerate and deccelerate. Say, a few days or weeks. But the majority of the travel would be (as you said) near instant for the travelers. Sure, for people on Earth or for other observers, it would take 635 years (plus change for accel and deccel).
At an acceleration of 1g it takes the best part of year to approach the speed of light and the same amount of time to slow down. It would take a fabulous amount of energy and even hitting the tiniest dust particle would cause an explosion.
So from the perspective of a photon, it takes zero time to go anywhere? If you were to go the speed of light you would not be able to tell the difference between arriving at a location x distance away vs continuing on to arrive at a distance x2 away?
@@thomasrobinette3227 True. You could not initiate slowdown. You are instantly where your journey ends. An object you collide with, the "end" of the universe, assuming some phenomenon interacts with you sooner or later. So it is recommended to travel a tiny bit slower. So time actually passes and action can take place.
Even if the composition of the atmosphere were PERFECT on a planet that large, I’m pretty sire either atmospheric pressure or gravity or both would crush us.
How on earth can they know there's a planet 650 light years away. Imagine travelling for 650 years at the speed of light. That's so freaking far. You can't even Imagine
its not far at all u ever heard of worm holes warp speed beam me up scotty but for real we as in usa has the tech from diffrent aliens they made agreements with
They stated that NASA has a machine that can lower an astronaut's body down to 32C. The average blood temperature of a human being is 36C. You could be cooler just by sitting in a a sunless room. Perhaps they meant -32C?
It would be about 8 times the mass and so it's gravity would be just over twice that of the Earth, similar to Jupiter. You could survive that but you wouldn't be comfortable at all.
@@maryann2628 Even doubling your body weight would be a serious strain on your heart so anything above 3g is going to be lethal, even if you wouldn't die straight away.
What if: Kepler 22b is a lucky planet with a star that is less hot than the sun. Kepler 22b: Yeah, for sure! Also, I dont have any humans and no future possibility of me providing for their settlement. Poor Earth, lucky me!😂
I wan't always live here in Earth BUT it would be interesting visit a New planet. Exoplanets like Kepler 22 B are amazing in the universe and space IS so interesting. I think our next home IS Proxima Cdntauri planet Proxima B. PS your space videos are BEST.
I think once we understand relative motion and motion deviation theory, we might travel across space without any problem. The galaxies which fascinate us will be at our fingertips. Light surely escapes the black hole but through a different dimension. Motion cannot be controlled; it can only be transferred.
@@THELONETRAVELER Some. Not nearly enough to rival there capabilites. I'm sure they know we're expiring and can see the wasted potential in our species. We have a lot of enlightenment to undergo before I could even see it as a reasonable option, for alien species to want to include us in some collective of alien life. We can't even take care of each other or our planet; how can we be trusted to be objective in a universal aspect?
@@ivankawnartist I believe in time humankind will grow self-aware and they will enrich this planet. In time, we might be able to alter the natural course of events.I see hope in these humans; their unending search to succeed.. I break the code of genes and it will be that same ability that will thrive humans forward. I have studied human imagination and creativity all my life; I see they can do great things. So, we can hope we will achieve the unthinkable once and start sharing our abilities with aliens.
@@THELONETRAVELER In time... Time is a merely a means to measure the alpha and omega. It's an obsession never fully agreed upon. Is the beginning simply marked by the appearance of an alien/human hybrid? The end will likely come by personal cause before any damage is reversed. The lack of discipline, absence of a concept of objective justice, and disdain for empathy continue to be immensely disappointing and concerning.
This planet is 635 light years away from earth. Even at the speed of light travelling at 186,000 miles per second. It would still take us 635 years to get there. We are not getting there. Unless we travel through dimensions or worm hole's. Or we design a spaceship like in star trek that travels 10 times the speed of light. 10 times the speed of the light works out to be 1,860,000 miles per second. That is the speed that we need to achieve to travel to the next star within seconds. Not years.
Its impossible to get faster than the speed of light, because anyways there's nothing with mass that can move in the speed of light, but even if we could travel in the half of speed of light it would really help us
@@lior4334 We will never reach there. We cannot even get to Alpha centauri which is 4.3 light years away. Which is 25 trillion miles. 50,000 years from earth on a normal spaceship.
You could never know what will happen in future. We know very little about our universe, so it's not impossible that we will be able to get to Kepler 22B just isn't happening any time soon. We still have 1 billion years on Earth before our Sun will be too bright lol
an extremely low chance because we named that planet Kepler 22-B Because it was discovered using the Kepler. I doubt they also have a telescope named the exact same, Kepler.
@@xgreeny yes true. My point is what if life already exist there and they just think we are aliens to them or the same we think about their planet, habitable but no species living on it.
@@rewazgurung1998 That is very possible. Saying that we are alone in this universe is like taking a spoonfull of water and saying there are no fish. In the entire universe, the possible number of habitable planets is a staggering 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 (source: Life Beyond: Chapter 1 - melodysheep) Two possibilities, either we are alone in this entire universe, or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.. I highly recommend you to watch melodysheep's space videos, mainly the "Life Beyond: Searching for Alien Life" series. They are entertaining as well as highly informing.
I don't think that we will ever be able to develop a spaceship that would travel at the speed of light, even in the distant future, so a journey of 600 light years will probably always be beyond the reach of humans. We must figured somethin else, and that something must be much closer to us..
I would like you to bring a topic "What if the physical size of human being of all ages is reduced to half" what will happen to earth in its nature? What are the benefits as well as threats to human beings?
Good knowledge, but what I learned is that there two important things in this universe for a human being 1: humanity 2: nature We're destroying both. So there's no point we're gonna make it.
What is important is that wherever there is life, it evolved to fit into that specific planet or satellite. Even our proteins are based on levorotatory peptides. Every molecular structure for every organism on this planet is designed by 4 billion years of adaptations to a majority water surfaced ferrous core, rocky planet of 5.972 x 1024 Kg in mass and a gravity of 9.807 m/s2 influenced by single satellite with a mass of 7.34767309 x 1022 Kg and gravity of 1.62 m/s2 revolving every 27 days 378,000 Km distant in a goldilocks area 146-152,000,000 Km from a star with a mass of 1.989x1030 Kg and a gravity of 274 m/s2 and a surface temperature of 5,778 Kelvin. Any even slight variation in any of the above parameters will affect the morphology and biochemistry of the life forms even before we get to atmospheric gasses, shape and mass of organisms and how they respire and utilize gasses, In short, we cannot survive on other “exoplanets” and extraterrestrial beings cannot survive on earth. There are some things that would be held in common between organisms on earth and organisms on subsurface Europa, tau Ceti e, Proxima Centauri b or Wolf1061c (V2306 Ophiuchi) . Alien life forms would be carbon based but the amino acids that make up their protein structures could easily be dextrorotatory (right-handed) rather than left-handed (levorotatory). Our skin shades were determined by sun exposure and more than 10,000 years ago all skin tones were dark. What if the “aliens” were from a planet or satellite, like Europa, where heat is generated from within? It is certain that any other life form that evolved via information transfer with ribonucleic acids would NOT have information units compatible with human genes. In addition, just as the parameters mentioned formed earth life, so also did life change the earth. In short we are stuck with earth and these silly dreams about colonizing space is totally stupid.
Great video. I imagine even blood pressure would need to be very high in living organisms due to the higher gravity. Plants would need to have similar uild in order to adopt to the high gravity. This video got me thinking.
At 4:12 it mentions that Kepler-22B *might* have an ocean 50 meters deep. That should be a big tip-off on how dissimilar it is to earth. Our deepest point known point of the ocean at the Mariana Trench, is over 11,000 meters deep.
Imagine if you are the person traveling 650ish years to Kepler 22 b and sleeping in a cryo pod for those amount of years. For you the trip would only be a few seconds long since you go into the pod and then sleep in a frozen like state. Its like going to sleep overnight! For the people on earth deploying that rocket it would still take 650ish years for you to get there. Its crazy to think about that a few generations would have to keep the program alive in order to get the valuable infos
I wonder if one of us could ask NASA to rename Kepler 22-b to Namek, considering you need to, as you put it, be "jacked" before going there, and the fact that it looks eerily similar to Namek in DBZ lol
I could imagine there already being life forms on Kepler 22-b looking for another planet to live on and seeing earth thinking it would be better than their planet.
if there is carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen, phosphorus and sulfur Then you know there is chance of life because life is made mainly out of those elements.
If the velocity of light is an unbreakable speed limit, then what's required for interstellar travel is a technology that takes travelers entirely outside of space-time and re-enters at the destination. We know of no scientific principles that would facilitate such a technology; if such principles do exist they're as far beyond current state-of-the-art as a Saturn V is beyond King Tut's chariot builders, and might well take as long to achieve. I keep thinking that the best way to expand beyond Earth is to build very large, self-propelled space habitats from rocky asteroids and go cruising all around the Solar System. There's plenty of interesting real estate within reach.
Mass is the issue, need a mass inverter, once created, an object could be propelled to speeds well in excess of the speed of light with minimal energy requirements
@@gjw000 that's complete rubbish, not even light can travel faster than light, where did you read this fiction? And a 'mass inverter' ? Really, you know Rick and Morty is not a science documentary right ...
@@jedaaa I'm working on one. I was given part of the blueprint at a David Icke conference. The noodle men are coming soon to give me the 2nd piece of the blueprint
Warp drives warp the space so the ship is just moving with the spacetime so it looks like its faster than light. Also there is no fast speed problem because its the spacetime thats moving.
I'm all for this habitable Earth like planet.. however, in our lifetime, that 635 Light years isn't possible (just 1 light year is more than 9 trillion kilometers away). However, if ever in the future someone invents some awesome spaceship that can travel that far, then we can be there...
I'm pretty sure that if a person could travel at the speed of light, the time and distance would become 0. So I don't think hibernation would be necessary. You would literally travel into the future 600+ years, instantly. Although, it's impossible to travel at the speed of light because you would need an infinite amount of energy.
Even at the speed if light it would take 600 years to get there. Photons are, as far as we know, the fastest travelling things in the universe and they take around 600 years to travel that distance.
@@Tao_Tology the expansion of our universe is said to be the fastest thing. Even faster than light itself, something i can even began to imagine how it’s possible.
@@Tao_Tology "Even at the speed if light it would take 600 years to get there. Photons are, as far as we know, the fastest travelling things in the universe and they take around 600 years to travel that distance." It's true if you stay on earth. But if your on the ship, it will indeed take you way less time. The planet will indeed come to you at near light speed, but the space will be contracted. Relativity is quite unintuitive at first.
Very interesting video….Sidebar…I always wonder though the search for life is based on our needs for life through experience here on Earth (water, oxygen, atmosphere etc.)….We have only experienced our point of view and scientist study what exsists already so why do we think that the same is needed when searching for life on other planets? Ex. We have organisms here that can survive without oxygen (Henneguya salminicola being an example)…why do we apply the same rules when looking for life on other planets? It is a genuine question and one that has sent me on a thought spiral for a while…I would love to hear from someone who may be more knowledgeable and can explain. TY 😊
Their looking for a new suitable planet for when this planet becomes inhabitable therefore they want to prepare for the next generations because maybe they will have the technology to do so.
U know, in 2004 NASA discovered a super-earth that’s bigger, with more islands, in between the crust and the magma is a whole layer of pure diamonds 💎. 2020 a high schooler who was 17 then, intern to Nasa discovered a planet hidden behind another. They allowed him to name it and he gave his first name, Planet Wolf. This was before the lockdown.
Surly a planet of that size the gravity will be so heavy I don’t think humans could go on it without feeling extremely heavy or potentially crushed.. 🥴
He actually got it wrong about what humans would need to do, It would actually be the leaner and lighter folk that would have an easier time in the higher gravity due solely to weight...although the ankles, neck and spines of our bodies would have to carry a lot more pressure on them.
Sign up for our newsletter! Big news coming soon: bit.ly/3VY6BMr
Yes
The water has a different color. Maybe it's not water.
Hey what if
please heart me (dont comment hate on this plz)
But there's no moon
It's sad that our governments would be willing to spend billions of dollars on trying to find another suitable planet for human life, yet they don't want to invest money into saving the planet we already call home.
I'm all for exploration and stuff, but you're right! I agree with you.
Sun will explode one day, they have to prepare and find any other place before that.
Even IF climate change is not a thing, we would still need to find another planet to ensure the survival of life. Life in the universe is too rare to not make contingencies against mass extinctions that have soared the planet time and time again.
Now that we actually have the potential to achieve it, why waste the opportunity? Because of ignorant old people like you? Lol
For something like this to happen, we would need to be able to unite as one, which is something that we’ve been failing at doing since the start of our existence because of cultural or territorial conflicts. One single entity (as big as it is) wouldn’t be able to tackle the issue by itself, we need to unite our knowledge and power.
This thought is, I think, incredibly scary, as most of the conflicts happening around the world are of extreme complexity and deeply rooted in our history, some of which started centuries ago. There’s not one ultimate solution to bring peace to everybody, and it seems like there is no solution at all due to the complexity of our issues...
I truly believe that space exploration is one of the only way humanity could come to the realization that we actually are one thing, in the grand scale of the universe.
I agree, but the main problem with this planet is too many people, if everyone on earth disappeared the planet would survive
watching these type of videos make me feel thankful to our Earth.
Yeah earth is our home and we have to take care of it.
rather , thank evolution )
We are lucky to have you.
I didn't know you're living on Earth. I though you're at Konoha?
First of all, water does not mean existence of life. Second, man will never get there.
Fun fact: if aliens on Kepler-22b looked at Earth right now, they would see us in Middle Ages (more specifically, during Polish-Teutonic War of 1410-1412)
So then scientists are looking at the future when they look at Kepler-22B
Why?
Can somebody explain please?
@@bibekdas7449 light takes 635 years to go from Earth to Kepler-22b. That means, that light they would be observing now, is light that was emitted in 1400's.
They'd be looking at a lot more interesting conflicts and things than some dumb war in Poland lol
@@bibekdas7449 Light year= distance light can travel In one year
It's 600some light years away
Meaning that the light we get from it and it gets from us is 600some years old.
For example the sun is 8 light minutes away, meaning that we are always seeing it 8 minutes later than it actually is. So if the sun was to turn completely black for some reason, we wouldn't know for 8 minutes straight
The smell inside that spacecraft after 600 years is something I wouldn't even want to contemplate.
Hahaha 👋
Hilarious. Btw, are you 12, or just brain-damaged?
its light years..we will never travel at the speed of light. how do you pilot such spaceship? you would crash into a star, a planet, asteroid, or some other object in cosmos within couple of seconds. so forget about getting there in 635 years. make it at least double. to 1270 years, at best.. probably more, like 5000 years, because you have to travel at managable speed to get anywhere.
If the spacecraft traveled at the speed of light, the trip for the astronauts would be instantaneous as time completely slows down for the travelers. But for us on earth 635 years would’ve passed.
@@Chris-tq1jy Yes, that’s called the theory of relativity. Kepler 22-b is 600ly away. If it took 635yrs to get there, they were near the speed of light - keeping in line with the speed of light not being possible. The show is from Ridley Scott, they had some variant of Hypersleep. The show was just so weird and interesting, i was really disappointed when it was cancelled.
What’s funny is that we’re only seeing what it looks like 635 years ago
I mean it’s remarkable that we might have another place to live
But at the same time what it looks like now is something we will never know for another 635 years
The interesting thing is that if we were living on Kepler 22b instead of earth, we would likely never achieve spaceflight due to gravity and the energy needed to get to orbit.
it takes 635 years to load MATRIX
Unless we go there
@@brigadiergeneral2399 We don't have the technology.
Shiii its prob gone now
No planet can compare to what we have right now. We must take care of it.
Well Said @Free Landholder Vlog
@empty stupid? All he said was to take care of our planet because the likely hood of other habitual planets inside our solar system is near impossible,yes we should search but yes,but for now we must take care and preserve for our for now future generations towards what we have,maybe the resources wouldn't be dried up if humans can learn to preserve more,even if we find a cool planet out there is nearly millions of light-years away,so yes,take care for what we have now
We can’t even take care of ourselves.
Period God bless you
That's so true. Words of wisdom, my friend! Words of wisdom.
If NASA finally finds an exoplanet that is exactly like earth which have life on it, we still don't know if it stayed the same because what we're seeing in outer space have happened in the past.
or did it?
i mean if its in the milky way its not that long ago
We wouldn't know cuz they wouldn't tell us lol
Yes, the telescope is seeing light as it was, the light takes along time to reach the telescope depending on the distance, same goes for the human eye. When we look out at the stars, we're basically looking back in time, because the light from these stars are very far away and all distances too.
This shit is fake
theres literally people on kepler just watching youtube videos about earth
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
or maybe they have more advanced technology😂
It’s crazy that what we’re able to tell is from data that’s 635 years old, and if we could leave tomorrow & travel at light speed, ANOTHER 635 years would go by, making a total of 1,270 years gone by.
Exactly...
We should all just die so the earth can be the same again 😢
@@Bloomix_winx1 Lmfao 😂
Wrap the space already now
Not true, you can't travel at speed of light and if you travel just close to the speed of light the trip will be shorter than 635 years on the traveller's clock. In fact it can be scaled down to near zero depending how close to c the traveller gets.
I love learning about new things from this channel. I never know what you’re going to talk about next and I love that 😅
and u comment on every what if videos lol
The only thing you're "learning" is how to be hypnotized
@@vishal28300 she's a beautiful lesbian 😍
@@davidsheckler8417 why
@@vishal28300 so what?
I’d love to go to space but I’d also be terrified of dying out there 💀
Space is Santa Claus for adults..so you'll be waiting a VERY LONG TIME
Well, according to flat Earthers, space doesn't exist anyways.
@@skylerallens you dare believe those flat-brained idiots?!?!
@@skylerallens 🤣
@@spoopyradicalsnake hmmmmmmmm but I’m afraid of suffocation 😔
I like how a majority of the video is background information 90% of the audience already knows and 10% is the actual title what a very quality video I’m very entertained
settle down tony stark
@@wayzUXsettle down jimi hendrix
@@Imasexafendersettle down einstein
@@averageminecraftenjoyer9419 settle down hitler
@@averageminecraftenjoyer9419settle down Oppenheimer
This planet is my top favorite when I first know about it back in 2013. I'm still imagining what life is possibly roam in there.
i just discovered it, and now i want to know too, but we may never know. :(
Hold on a second... This planet is over 600 light-years from Earth, so basically this means we're seeing it like it was 600 years ago, so the planet might not even be there anymore, right?
That is true technically you’re constantly looking at things that are in the past.
how would a planet disappear over 600 years?
@@riri_rmrz I don't know. Maybe a planet sized asteroid crashing into it?
I’m going tomorrow, you?
Correct
Imagine after humans reach there and see it is already destroyed, what we saw from the earth was 635 years ago, Safe journey again back to🌎
So true......
Going back home to find eath destpyed
@@trendingke7444 😂😂
@@trendingke7444 lol
@@trendingke7444 and then u would become homeless and planetless
My fascination with space led me to this amazing channel. Thank you for the informative videos!
0:00 / 9:10 •Could this be Earth 2.0
1:10 / 9:10
• Exoplanets
4:10 / 9:10 • Kepler 22-b might have an ocean
6:30 / 9:10 • Growing plants
8:14 / 9:10 • How would we thrive?
I literally watched all of your videos. Suggestion. What if planets lost their rings and moons.
Interesting one😎
thank you
Intresting one indeed
thank you
We are lucky to have you! Thank you for your suggestion. 🙂
If someone travelled in a spaceship at the speed of light, for them they would arrive at Kepler 22-b in an instant. Travelling 635 light years would feel like less time than snapping your fingers, but in Earth time it would be 635 years. A little slower in the spaceship and it would be like just a few hours or minutes. This is because of time dilation and Einstein's theory of relativity. This also eliminates the need for 635 years of hibernation and life support.
Oh ok...
I don't think that's exactly correct.
Travelling at the speed of light means you would take the same amount of time it takes light to get there.
Light takes 635 years to get there - in REAL time, not relativistic time.
Which means it would take YOU 635 years to get there and it would feel like 635 years for you.
In order to experience the sort of time dilation effect you're alluding to, one would have to travel SLOWER than (but close to) the speed of light.
Which means, for example, if you were travelling at 0.5 times the speed of light, it would theoretically take you 1,270 years to get there (from your frame of reference) but from the point of view of the rest of the universe (i.e. Earth) much much longer than 1,270 years will pass before you get there.
if we count 635 using our earth year, yes it will take 635 years to get there at the speed of light.
I think you're right because the moment we step into light-speed spacecraft our frame of reference will change and earth's 635 years will no longer be our 635 years. Since reference changed, time will be somewhat different.
Like the movie Interstellar where they spend one hour on other plant(and feel 1 hour only) but on earth, 7 year passes.
Jesus, that means you'd have to say goodbye to your family members for good, because the light travel will get you there pretty quick, but hundreds of years will pass and they'll all be long dead.
I like how scientists are searching for life 600 light years away but barely even searched 3 percent of our own ocean!
Who cares about the oceans? I got my copper-infused socks and a cell phone.
They needed search the ocean for a place to live?
I don't really see how that would help right now.
@@ge2623u mom care
@@iamhorcruxeru stupid that why u don’t wanna to know
Kepler-22B is the Earth where Anime Characters Actually Exist
Mr.madara Uchiha
Planet namek is Kepler
This is so great to learn about.. Can you believe it..?? 635 light-years... ?? Unbelievable far away... But still.. In a cosmical scale... Its just "a few blocks" away from earth....
i think in a universal scale, that distance would literally just be a few nanometers xD
Can you believe it 🤷...another 🐑 that thinks light years exist 🤣😅😊🤦♂️
@@i.pristine989 that's actually true, scientist can see through other galaxys, which means that they have to be more than 100m light years from us
@@lior4334 what about the stars we see from earth during the night? I wonder just how far away they are and if their heat actually reach us or not
@@i.pristine989 some of them are stars and some of then are planet that shining because of the stars
It's always interesting seeing planets similar to Earth and starts to be curious if someone rather than us earthlings lives in the universe
It would be great if there were planets like ours out there that life could flourish on🌏❤️
And ban religion
WILL FIND IT XOON.
This is only one work on it don't keep saying next home next home
And ban Liberals too
There is none
In an environment with a stronger gravitational pull, you wouldn't want to "bulk-up," you would want to bulk-down. Bulking-up will only add to your mass, and make you even heavier. And if Kepler is as much as 2x gravity, it would be pretty much impossible to live on that planet. Upon arrival, your heart would have difficulty pumping blood, since your blood would weigh twice as much. Standing would be difficult, stroke would be likely, and breathing would be labored.
I once read that the maximum gravitational field humans could survive long-term is four-and-a-half times the gravity on Earth. Anything over 5 g's we would pass out and ultimately die.
The problems I listed above are survivable in the short term. Meaning, upon arrival on Kepler, you'd experience these problems, but could survive for weeks, maybe months before finally succumbing to systemic organ failure. At 5x gravity, you'd have only minutes.
@@thatguyrich9822 Well I suppose K-2 is out then.
By the time humans could reach such a planet they surely would be able to completely re-engineer the human body
@@infraviolett651 A Type 1 civilization or K1 in the Kardashev Scale.
Those planets are so large compared to Earth that once on the surface, we would no longer be able to get off the planet due to the gravitational pull. Your weight would be too much to bare and your bones would break.. I'm sure that if there are life forms on that planet, they would be extremely tough compared to earth life, and would probably be a whole lot stronger than us.
2, to 2.5 times gravity would not break your bones if that was the case then the spinning carnival ride, roller coasters, and fighter jets would kill or severely injure people constantly
36x mass
@A Shot of Hennessy whatever u say fatso
it's probably where saiyans live
@A Shot of Hennessy can you do your research properly? It has a gravity of acceleration at 17.36 M/S compared to Earth's which is at 9.807 M/S so keppler 2b is about 90 percent more in gravity or 1.9G of acceleration on you.
It's much less than a roller coaster which could go at 4Gs
I lived there for a few years it was a beautiful place 10/10
Take me with you next time bro
Nice. Can I go with you next time?
I live there now. Are you the person that never picked up after your dog?
Take Me
@@Krishnendulaha 100TB/s
I feel like potentially habitable planets deserve good names like Earth, just in case we go there as our new planet
Earth could be called xyz123 by aliens for all we know
fun fact no one knows who named our planet earth
It's not set in stone, if and when we colonize, there is a good chance it'll have a name change.
@@SaifAli-ou8rr and the other planets?
@@SaifAli-ou8rr ever heard of Urantia?
0:39 And where there's water, there's also the possibility of life. Human life.
Translation: It's free real estate.
Remember when there was a petition to give Kepler 22-b the name "Namek"?
Kinda wish it went through, even if mainly because I don't understand why most exoplanets/stars never get proper names at all.
All names of astronomical objects must be approved by the International Astronomical Union in order to be official.
@@sailordolly Yeah, and one of the rules they have is that a name can't be copyrighted. That's why the petition was rejected. So that particular case is understandable. It just annoys me that they *so rarely* name anything.
lol what didnt know that
@@LendriMujina kinda hard to find enough gods to name >5000 planets after
@@TheLostProbe doesn't have to be gods.
I love this channel, this channel is what got me into learning more about space, space is realy cool thanks, and keep up the good, not good AMAZING work
Thank you! Without you, we wouldn’t be here.
I just came across your channel and I'm a third of the way through the video and I am absolutely loving the energy in your voice and the video quality/editing is amazing! You have a new subscriber! Have a good day bro and thank you!
Imagine people on Kepler looking to us and saying “oh a small us” 😂
Great 😃
I am finally back at RUclips and all my old contents.
These were the only things I used to watch back in 2019 and 2020.
Really feel nostalgic now!
The James Webb Space Telescope is going to show us its first Deep Field images on the 12th. I'm so ready!
In fact, other planets have already been found, much more "hospitable" for humans, where people will be able to live in the future. I can't say about whether they are further or closer than Kepler, but I confidently remember the studies that show that it is better there. When people invent a working way to travel in space fast enough, we will obviously fly to the wrong place. But, it was great to learn that scientists have finally developed cryo sleep for humans! I still thought it was all fantastic. Well, that's cool. This will be very useful to future space travelers, because their ships are unlikely to develop a speed much higher than the speed of light, as it seems to me, and they will need to somehow survive during their journey.
When we have interstellar travel in practical time scales planets won't even matter anymore. We'll build artificial "earths" from asteroids by making oneil cylinders. You can make something stupid like trillions of these iirc. We also have the option for things like the rings halo (bishop rings) and shell worlds/matrioshka worlds which are terraformed planets containing multiple layers all of which have earth gravity. Habitable planets likely won't matter very much in the far future with advances in technology.
i think anyone would take Teegarden's Star b/c or Kepler-186f over Kepler-22b. i dont really feel like getting crushed and suffocated
@@TheLostProbe I just want to go there to kepler 22-b. 😭😭😭😭😭
@@isaacmontecillo4762 wait another 100+ years and you can
@@TheLostProbe 100+ YEARS? THEN,I'M JUST REALLY DEAD BY THEN! 💀💀💀💀💀💀
Just remind everyone, we are far far away from reaching the speed of light, and whether we can achieve the light speed remains questionable 😅
Even if we did know how to travel with the speed of light, it would take more than 600 years to get to this so called Earth 2.0
@@ContagiousSponge lolol ikr
Humans and other animals will go extinct on earth before this will happen
And we wont be able to😊 earth is for people
I have a question: If/since James Webb Telescope can capture pictures from that distance, can't it take close up shots of nearby stars or planets with great details? Like the way we do with our phones?
James webb isn't a camera. It's scans the infrared light and than we take that data and form computer simulations from that data and form an opinion on what it may look like. So every computer simulation or picture that you see is just an estimated guess. We have no true idea what it looks like unless we actually see it.
@@unclerico1106wow. Thanks. But I want to believe those within our solar system are real pics and vidoes since they're so much relatively nearer. I mean Mars, Jupiter, Sun etc
@@Tirelesswarrior actually I don't know if that's actually true or not I've read and heard it actually pretty hard to take pictures of other plants in our solar system. Our suns light asteroids and dust can hinder our abilities to take a decent picture. That's why we use this method.
What would intelligent life look like in a place that has constant daylight? It's never night. They never saw the stars except the sun. Do they even imagine that the universe exists?
Such of planet I don't think is habitable.,beceause it must orbit a red dwarf star.,and such of stars almost destroy a planet, beceause eliminates huge flares and radation's.
@@stefanrafa1348 and plus if it's never night that side of the planet would never take time to cool down thus likely overheating even if the sun would only apply 15⁰C due to the continuous heat applied to it. Not to mention, the other side would be inhabitedly cold due to having no heat applied from the sun at all.
@@aleekscribblerofdeydras9036 damn, i didn’t think about that
@@aleekscribblerofdeydras9036
Day and night is not an exact line There is a transition between day and night
Maybe life is in the twilight zone
Where the sun is always low in the sky or barely below the horizon
And the temperatures is in the right zone not too cold or too hot
Just the right tempeture.
And if it had a atmosphere the heat would reach the night side
WHAT IF......we could terraform Venus and Mars? What would the evolution or plants, animals, and humans would be? How would they differ? What are the pros and cons of being a 3 planet species? Would this help advance our space programs? Who would run the planets? Would they be 1 world government or many countries like Earth?
This is intriguing. Looking into it.
@@WhatIfScienceShow I thought there were videos on them already?
Venus greenhouse conditions would be too hard to change. Mars problem would be re-establishing it’s magneto sphere that’s crucial to prevent solar winds from stripping the atmosphere.
JJ I know the process well let's say theoretical ways as of now to terraform a planet. But there's multiple theories on how to do it, as in Venus's case you need to cool down the planet 1st, so maybe we could build something to reflect most of the sunlight that hits the planet itself, or there are chemicals we could add that would help the cool down process, there's ways of filtering certain chemicals (carbon) out of the air. The list goes on and on how to terraform a planet such as Mars and Venus but I'm saying what if we could it through magic or science or whatever Im just theoretically saying what if we could do it.
Thank you What If Channel for seeing the multiple questions here and not just how to terraform the planet
1 world government… research it my friend dig deep into it, research QAnon, and Adrenochrome 👍
We love Planet Earth. Nothing can replace it. 😔😔😔
Exactly. Glad to see another person who loves Earth. 🌎 🌍🌏❤️.
I would hope Kepler22b is a water world, but with tiny islands to set camp and have solid ground under our feed. Just like RL-Kamino, just like in Star Wars Episode 2. Seems to be the best option to live.
Most likely it's a water world with very little, if any, land mass.
If there's any life in Kepler 22b, it might exist underwater.
Cool! You always provide us new information! Great work!
There's nothing new about this. It's new to you, you mean.
Information...AHAHAHAHA...oh wait...hold on...AHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHA
I love your videos .Excellent job
if you travel at speed of light the time around you also drastically slow down. So maybe it would a few hours journey for you
Yeh 635 year
we dont know what will happen and if will happen when someone will be able to travel with that speed. We know theory , but no one knows what will happen. Maybe if we will get this speed thing that was that fast will collapse on itself or something. We Think we know all about science, but science is all about what we DONT know.
@@s_cuzz well said friend..
Could the human body handle the speed of light?
@@TieaimMaybe 🧐
This has been my favorite exoplanet for years!! I love this video :D
I like Gj 1214b but also Kepler 22b too.
@@dicerosautismambient4894 If that planet is going to be our home it's not going to happen in our lifetime. We don't even have the technology of lightspeed to get their! We can't even get a human on Mars! How do we know if this planet doesn't already have intelligent life or will try to kill us thinking we're intruders?
Learning about Kepler 22b is more important than my exam which is just 2 hrs from now!😇
Very neat video, love thinking of this stuff. If we could travel at the speed of light, those on board would not experience passage of time, while 600 years would have passed on Earth during the trip. But we can't travel at the speed of light, so if we could accelerate at 1g continuously, about 12 years would pass on board. Not an insignificant amount of time, and cryogenic freezing is a good idea, but significant;y less than 600 years.
you ever heard of the secret space program we have starships going to distant planets talking to manny difrent races of people the annunaki live on planet nibiru in a parrellet universe they were on this planet before humans were there are over a hundred races of aliens visiting this planet now but its kept secret by the cabal
I got 28 years
Props to the guy who went there and told us this information
People forget that a super earth would have 2x+ earth gravity, meaning we'd take thousands of years to adapt, working out wouldn't do it.
All life there would be adapted, and be super strong and dense, probably making them dangerous.
You'd probably walk down like the Prometheus crew with no bio suits too.
In this case actually 5,76 times earth's gravity.
@@patricj951 I was generalizing but makes sense with the size difference shown, provided the density is the same or similar.
Actually now I wonder if size the right measurement to use. If the core and mantle proportions are different than earth, the density would be way different. A proportionately smaller core with more mantle would make it less dense, and vice versa for a larger core.
In that way, the gravity would be impossible to predict.
If I lived on Kepler 22b I'd probably go WA DA DA DA
😂😂 Kep1er fan I see
Good video!! Only it won’t take 635 years for those traveling to Kepler 22B, because when you travel at the speed of light, time stops, so you won’t really experience any passage of time. But for those observers watching you travel, it’ll take 635 to see you arrive.
Indeed. Many do not get the relativity part. Or forget about it. Then comes the guy "but you can't travel at the speed of light" - fine, then 99.9999999 so it would take 5 seconds (experienced by the travelers) to travel at that speed. The only meaningful flight time experienced would be the time it takes to accelerate and deccelerate. Say, a few days or weeks. But the majority of the travel would be (as you said) near instant for the travelers. Sure, for people on Earth or for other observers, it would take 635 years (plus change for accel and deccel).
@@Kyanzes exactly! Lol yea there’s always that guy that wants to sound smart about traveling at 100% the speed of light 😂
At an acceleration of 1g it takes the best part of year to approach the speed of light and the same amount of time to slow down. It would take a fabulous amount of energy and even hitting the tiniest dust particle would cause an explosion.
So from the perspective of a photon, it takes zero time to go anywhere? If you were to go the speed of light you would not be able to tell the difference between arriving at a location x distance away vs continuing on to arrive at a distance x2 away?
@@thomasrobinette3227 True. You could not initiate slowdown. You are instantly where your journey ends. An object you collide with, the "end" of the universe, assuming some phenomenon interacts with you sooner or later. So it is recommended to travel a tiny bit slower. So time actually passes and action can take place.
Yay I can tell my mom that im learning stuff while watching youtube🥳
lol
What if the world turned inside out?
🤔
We'd die.
Do you mean the core on the outside and the crust in the inside ?
@@tsnmproductions yes
@@JK_JK_JK_JK gyhygyggc
Even if the composition of the atmosphere were PERFECT on a planet that large, I’m pretty sire either atmospheric pressure or gravity or both would crush us.
Weakling
@@mg6192 HAHAHAH!! Indeed!!
How on earth can they know there's a planet 650 light years away. Imagine travelling for 650 years at the speed of light. That's so freaking far. You can't even Imagine
its not far at all u ever heard of worm holes warp speed beam me up scotty but for real we as in usa has the tech from diffrent aliens they made agreements with
@@karlbenecke6769 you just made me piss in my pants a little from laughter 😃 😀 🤡
Light travels quite nice through the ether, no atmosphere so the distance away isn't that big of a deal
@@Fantastic_Six nah, dark matter and that.
I've just discovered this channel omg it just leaves me in imaginations
Keep it up 😘😘
This is a good video to watch while eating breakfast
They stated that NASA has a machine that can lower an astronaut's body down to 32C. The average blood temperature of a human being is 36C. You could be cooler just by sitting in a a sunless room. Perhaps they meant -32C?
Or 32F (0C)? I wondered the same thing myself.
32 Kelvin i think because cryogenic sleep requires extremely low temp?
wondered if anyone caught that
They don't want to freeze the body as that would destroy the tissues. they just want to slow down the cellular activities.
-32C would probably kill you.
It's 2.4 times larger, so unless its made from super light materials compared to Earth, you're gonna end up crushed to the ground by gravity.
It would be about 8 times the mass and so it's gravity would be just over twice that of the Earth, similar to Jupiter. You could survive that but you wouldn't be comfortable at all.
You need like 15-20 g to get crushed.
@@maryann2628 Even doubling your body weight would be a serious strain on your heart so anything above 3g is going to be lethal, even if you wouldn't die straight away.
What if: Kepler 22b is a lucky planet with a star that is less hot than the sun.
Kepler 22b: Yeah, for sure! Also, I dont have any humans and no future possibility of me providing for their settlement. Poor Earth, lucky me!😂
I wan't always live here in Earth BUT it would be interesting visit a New planet. Exoplanets like Kepler 22 B are amazing in the universe and space IS so interesting. I think our next home IS Proxima Cdntauri planet Proxima B. PS your space videos are BEST.
There is definitely some sort of life there though, it’s amazing to imagine
It's probably aliens 👾👽 or mutant creatures or skinwalkers
@@RusskiAdidas humans will exterminate all civilizations before landing a planet.
@@RusskiAdidas Imagine living there all alone.
@@isaacmontecillo7948 if I didn't bring a imperial Russian or any World war one weapon I'd be dead
Imagine how long flights would be on a planet that big
what if they try to go there
@@ClipfordStudio ded
Dankjewel voor de tip marko ik heb altijd al gedacht die enquêtes kunnen niet goed zijn
I think once we understand relative motion and motion deviation theory, we might travel across space without any problem. The galaxies which fascinate us will be at our fingertips. Light surely escapes the black hole but through a different dimension. Motion cannot be controlled; it can only be transferred.
The aliens we've had contact with aren't going to give us that kind of tech.
@@ivankawnartist They actually allowed us to have access to their technical know-how. It is only a matter of time.
@@THELONETRAVELER Some. Not nearly enough to rival there capabilites. I'm sure they know we're expiring and can see the wasted potential in our species. We have a lot of enlightenment to undergo before I could even see it as a reasonable option, for alien species to want to include us in some collective of alien life. We can't even take care of each other or our planet; how can we be trusted to be objective in a universal aspect?
@@ivankawnartist I believe in time humankind will grow self-aware and they will enrich this planet. In time, we might be able to alter the natural course of events.I see hope in these humans; their unending search to succeed.. I break the code of genes and it will be that same ability that will thrive humans forward. I have studied human imagination and creativity all my life; I see they can do great things. So, we can hope we will achieve the unthinkable once and start sharing our abilities with aliens.
@@THELONETRAVELER In time... Time is a merely a means to measure the alpha and omega. It's an obsession never fully agreed upon. Is the beginning simply marked by the appearance of an alien/human hybrid? The end will likely come by personal cause before any damage is reversed.
The lack of discipline, absence of a concept of objective justice, and disdain for empathy continue to be immensely disappointing and concerning.
This planet is 635 light years away from earth. Even at the speed of light travelling at 186,000 miles per second. It would still take us 635 years to get there. We are not getting there. Unless we travel through dimensions or worm hole's. Or we design a spaceship like in star trek that travels 10 times the speed of light. 10 times the speed of the light works out to be 1,860,000 miles per second. That is the speed that we need to achieve to travel to the next star within seconds. Not years.
Its impossible to get faster than the speed of light, because anyways there's nothing with mass that can move in the speed of light, but even if we could travel in the half of speed of light it would really help us
@@lior4334 We will never reach there. We cannot even get to Alpha centauri which is 4.3 light years away. Which is 25 trillion miles. 50,000 years from earth on a normal spaceship.
@@Sonic-ro3ot u talking about alpha centauty... Yet we cant even reach pluto
@@lior4334 Not even pluto bro. Let alone anything else out of our solar system.
You could never know what will happen in future. We know very little about our universe, so it's not impossible that we will be able to get to Kepler 22B just isn't happening any time soon. We still have 1 billion years on Earth before our Sun will be too bright lol
What if people are living there and call their planet as "Earth" and call our planet as Kepler 22-b?
an extremely low chance because we named that planet Kepler 22-B Because it was discovered using the Kepler. I doubt they also have a telescope named the exact same, Kepler.
@@xgreeny yes true. My point is what if life already exist there and they just think we are aliens to them or the same we think about their planet, habitable but no species living on it.
@@rewazgurung1998 That is very possible.
Saying that we are alone in this universe is like taking a spoonfull of water and saying there are no fish.
In the entire universe, the possible number of habitable planets is a staggering 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 (source: Life Beyond: Chapter 1 - melodysheep)
Two possibilities, either we are alone in this entire universe, or we are not.
Both are equally terrifying..
I highly recommend you to watch melodysheep's space videos, mainly the "Life Beyond: Searching for Alien Life" series. They are entertaining as well as highly informing.
@@xgreeny awesome dude
@@rewazgurung1998 Tell me if you found melodysheep's videos interesting :)
I don't think that we will ever be able to develop a spaceship that would travel at the speed of light, even in the distant future, so a journey of 600 light years will probably always be beyond the reach of humans. We must figured somethin else, and that something must be much closer to us..
Kepler 22B People calling us Crazy23B planet😂😂😂
I would like you to bring a topic "What if the physical size of human being of all ages is reduced to half" what will happen to earth in its nature? What are the benefits as well as threats to human beings?
Thanks for the suggestion!
@@WhatIfScienceShow 😊 eagerly waiting 💓💓💓
Anyone else find themselves pausing at 3:11?
Good knowledge, but what I learned is that there two important things in this universe for a human being
1: humanity
2: nature
We're destroying both. So there's no point we're gonna make it.
What is important is that wherever there is life, it evolved to fit into that specific planet or satellite. Even our proteins are based on levorotatory peptides. Every molecular structure for every organism on this planet is designed by 4 billion years of adaptations to a majority water surfaced ferrous core, rocky planet of 5.972 x 1024 Kg in mass and a gravity of 9.807 m/s2 influenced by single satellite with a mass of 7.34767309 x 1022 Kg and gravity of 1.62 m/s2 revolving every 27 days 378,000 Km distant in a goldilocks area 146-152,000,000 Km from a star with a mass of 1.989x1030 Kg and a gravity of 274 m/s2 and a surface temperature of 5,778 Kelvin. Any even slight variation in any of the above parameters will affect the morphology and biochemistry of the life forms even before we get to atmospheric gasses, shape and mass of organisms and how they respire and utilize gasses, In short, we cannot survive on other “exoplanets” and extraterrestrial beings cannot survive on earth. There are some things that would be held in common between organisms on earth and organisms on subsurface Europa, tau Ceti e, Proxima Centauri b or Wolf1061c (V2306 Ophiuchi) . Alien life forms would be carbon based but the amino acids that make up their protein structures could easily be dextrorotatory (right-handed) rather than left-handed (levorotatory). Our skin shades were determined by sun exposure and more than 10,000 years ago all skin tones were dark. What if the “aliens” were from a planet or satellite, like Europa, where heat is generated from within? It is certain that any other life form that evolved via information transfer with ribonucleic acids would NOT have information units compatible with human genes. In addition, just as the parameters mentioned formed earth life, so also did life change the earth. In short we are stuck with earth and these silly dreams about colonizing space is totally stupid.
Great video. I imagine even blood pressure would need to be very high in living organisms due to the higher gravity. Plants would need to have similar uild in order to adopt to the high gravity. This video got me thinking.
the video is wrong it's not 2G it's 6G, and no human can live in that, the moment we land we will be pancakes.
Trillions of galaxies, with billions of stars that have many planet’s around them. I believe there is life out there, on many planets
At 4:12 it mentions that Kepler-22B *might* have an ocean 50 meters deep. That should be a big tip-off on how dissimilar it is to earth. Our deepest point known point of the ocean at the Mariana Trench, is over 11,000 meters deep.
Imagine if you are the person traveling 650ish years to Kepler 22 b and sleeping in a cryo pod for those amount of years. For you the trip would only be a few seconds long since you go into the pod and then sleep in a frozen like state. Its like going to sleep overnight! For the people on earth deploying that rocket it would still take 650ish years for you to get there. Its crazy to think about that a few generations would have to keep the program alive in order to get the valuable infos
So from the travellers point of view he would be there in a heartbeat
I wonder if one of us could ask NASA to rename Kepler 22-b to Namek, considering you need to, as you put it, be "jacked" before going there, and the fact that it looks eerily similar to Namek in DBZ lol
Not all life forms need conditions similar to earth. Maybe there are some aliens who survive on sulphuric acid
maybe there is aliens who survive on a black hole
I could imagine there already being life forms on Kepler 22-b looking for another planet to live on and seeing earth thinking it would be better than their planet.
If it's 36x bigger than Earth, then it has an equator of roughly 900,000 miles long. With 36 gravity, over 3x strong enough to crush us.
It’s not 36x bigger it’s 36x heavier it’s only 3.2x bigger then earth.
@@luvmxrio7203 I'm assuming "heavier" is referring to mass and "bigger" is referring to radius?
@@Glitch315 yea I was just dumbing it down
I hope someday we will have communication with them.
with whom?
I’d love to live anywhere but earth. Get me to space!
Same I don't want to deal with politics
@@rabbadoodles4522 and you think new planets would be safe from politics because…?
@@kindadumb916 if yougo there by yourself without anyone noticing. You'll be safe from political events.
@@rabbadoodles4522 oh I assumed a bunch of humans would accompany you on the trip
Not time for another suitable planet, we must save earth and protect our home
if there is carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen, phosphorus and sulfur Then you know there is chance of life because life is made mainly out of those elements.
What if somebody like us people are already living there.
Then we take it from them. As human are always be, taking stuff from others
@@tiger_gaze yesb💪🏻💪🏻
We all know that it is home to the Mithraic worshippers, atheists, and giant flying snakes.
We'll get ready for a take over star tropper
It is imposible
If the velocity of light is an unbreakable speed limit, then what's required for interstellar travel is a technology that takes travelers entirely outside of space-time and re-enters at the destination. We know of no scientific principles that would facilitate such a technology; if such principles do exist they're as far beyond current state-of-the-art as a Saturn V is beyond King Tut's chariot builders, and might well take as long to achieve. I keep thinking that the best way to expand beyond Earth is to build very large, self-propelled space habitats from rocky asteroids and go cruising all around the Solar System. There's plenty of interesting real estate within reach.
Mass is the issue, need a mass inverter, once created, an object could be propelled to speeds well in excess of the speed of light with minimal energy requirements
@@gjw000 that's complete rubbish, not even light can travel faster than light, where did you read this fiction? And a 'mass inverter' ? Really, you know Rick and Morty is not a science documentary right ...
@@jedaaa I'm working on one. I was given part of the blueprint at a David Icke conference. The noodle men are coming soon to give me the 2nd piece of the blueprint
@@gjw000 that's if the King of the potato people don't get you first!!! 😱
Warp drives warp the space so the ship is just moving with the spacetime so it looks like its faster than light.
Also there is no fast speed problem because its the spacetime thats moving.
i,m watching from Nepal🇳🇵. proudly respectable your explain 🎉🎉❤
I'm all for this habitable Earth like planet.. however, in our lifetime, that 635 Light years isn't possible (just 1 light year is more than 9 trillion kilometers away). However, if ever in the future someone invents some awesome spaceship that can travel that far, then we can be there...
@Flanboyforlife exactly get this fool outta here
I'm pretty sure that if a person could travel at the speed of light, the time and distance would become 0. So I don't think hibernation would be necessary. You would literally travel into the future 600+ years, instantly.
Although, it's impossible to travel at the speed of light because you would need an infinite amount of energy.
we could just get enough energy from antimatters but no humans would 100% make a mistake and would destroy the planet earth
Even at the speed if light it would take 600 years to get there.
Photons are, as far as we know, the fastest travelling things in the universe and they take around 600 years to travel that distance.
@@Tao_Tology the expansion of our universe is said to be the fastest thing. Even faster than light itself, something i can even began to imagine how it’s possible.
@@dream8870 The underlying fabric of reality 'expanding' is not 'an object travelling faster than light'
@@Tao_Tology "Even at the speed if light it would take 600 years to get there.
Photons are, as far as we know, the fastest travelling things in the universe and they take around 600 years to travel that distance."
It's true if you stay on earth. But if your on the ship, it will indeed take you way less time. The planet will indeed come to you at near light speed, but the space will be contracted. Relativity is quite unintuitive at first.
can you do
" what if all of earth was land "
now that would be interesting 🧐
Without oceans, the land would be almost entirely desert, if not entirely lifeless.
Imagine waking up from a 650 y old cryo sleep just to get crushed like a soda can once you step onto this planet 😂
What if kepler 22b had an earth size moon that was habitable?
We would see it wobble
The mass is enough to be a binary system.
Very interesting video….Sidebar…I always wonder though the search for life is based on our needs for life through experience here on Earth (water, oxygen, atmosphere etc.)….We have only experienced our point of view and scientist study what exsists already so why do we think that the same is needed when searching for life on other planets? Ex. We have organisms here that can survive without oxygen (Henneguya salminicola being an example)…why do we apply the same rules when looking for life on other planets? It is a genuine question and one that has sent me on a thought spiral for a while…I would love to hear from someone who may be more knowledgeable and can explain. TY 😊
Their looking for a new suitable planet for when this planet becomes inhabitable therefore they want to prepare for the next generations because maybe they will have the technology to do so.
U know, in 2004 NASA discovered a super-earth that’s bigger, with more islands, in between the crust and the magma is a whole layer of pure diamonds 💎. 2020 a high schooler who was 17 then, intern to Nasa discovered a planet hidden behind another. They allowed him to name it and he gave his first name, Planet Wolf. This was before the lockdown.
You know NASA is a $20 billion dollar a year scam dazzling you with nonsense
this is why we need to take care of our planet
THERE'S NO BETTER PLANET THAT WE ARE ALREADY LIVING IN! ❤
Well, floods, volcanos, tsunamis, earthquakes, global warming
Surly a planet of that size the gravity will be so heavy I don’t think humans could go on it without feeling extremely heavy or potentially crushed.. 🥴
He actually got it wrong about what humans would need to do, It would actually be the leaner and lighter folk that would have an easier time in the higher gravity due solely to weight...although the ankles, neck and spines of our bodies would have to carry a lot more pressure on them.
You cant get crushed at 2g
Thats more like 15-20 g
I wish I were born in an era when we made it possible to navigate between planets and met alien life smh
It will take a few more thousands years