Conformational Analysis of Cyclohexane Part 1 Organic Chemistry
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
- Visit our website for the notes of this lecture: knowbeetutorin...
Get private tutoring from anywhere in the world, via your computer, from this instructor. He offers help in Organic Chemistry, General Chemistry, Physics, MCAT, PCAT, and DAT.
SUBMIT AN MCAT PROBLEM AND I WILL SHOW YOU HOW TO SOLVE IT VIA VIDEO. FREE. VISIT WEBSITE FOR DETAILS.
knowbeetutorin...
My favourite channel now, tomorrow is my exams
Thanks alot
Thank you so much for this video! Clarified over 5 hours of confusion and frustration.
Please make more videos......
I should have come here before!
My all friends would be happy when I recommend this channel....
I can't put my expression into words. ..... but I'm so happy to be here.
very clear!! more clear than my lecturer lecturing. thank you so much!
OMG - thank you. Read my text four times but was not getting it. Watched this and it CLICKED
Gem of a teacher. Endangered species !
Excellent lectures on conformational analysis
Thank you so much for this, I was having an extmely hard time with the cyclic rings and determining cis and trans, thank you, thank you, thank you!
wow ... best vdeo ever .. best explanation... best person who described .. 👍👍👍
#MayUBeBlessed .. 👍👍👍
The best thing about you...u make things easier.... great..!!
Great for anyone looking for introduction or review!! thanks guys!!!
Really nice videos about conformational analysis. All of them. Congratulations
Perfect and very clear, thank you very much.
Excellent explanation! Better then my teacher!
wow ....... thank you very much.... you gave the best explanation ever
Thank you
You really helped me understand the Cis - Trans isomers
Voyages
Black
N, I
You are a genius!
Perfect, thank you so much
Thank sir by Rishik 🖒🖒🖒👌👌👌
all concepts crystal clear thank you soooooooooooo much
Clear and correct explanation. Thank you.
It is reallt easy to learn these concepts here..
Best explanation...
simply, EXCELLENT! Very clear! Thanks
thank u sir you cleared my doubt
Thank you very much. you helped a lot to understand this.
So clear! Thank you for sharing.
best explanation
very good video >> thank you very much
Life saviour
nice video thanks a lot
perfect and clear
Brilliant
19:50 Are they ring flipped or only Me substituents switched the orientation?
Good
AMazing, you are amazing, where can I get the rest of your videos!
14:20 can we draw the first and third methyls equatorial up or how do we know if both are downwards.
Awesome!!
When you ring flip does the up-axial position become an up-equitorial position or down-equitorial?
Wow... Tnk u sooo much...
Why is a cis 1,3 disubstituted cyclohexan more stable than its trans isomer?
"take the time to make a model of this"
-sees model kit
nnaaaahhhhhhhh
Superb
woow.....enough for jee advanced...
yes it is enough for iit jee
Super explanation. Really helped me a lot to better understand
at 1:02 point no. 2 you said chair is maximum energy and least energy half chair
but at 4:54 you are saying chair has lowest energy and half chair has maximum energy
man your awesome!
How do you know how to number the carbons, because in the beginning you numbered them different from how you numbered the carbons in the chair model for the problems? And how do you know which way to draw the chair.
Beginning to number is arbitrary. Just keep in mind that you have to be consistent after you pick your first carbon.
+Chris Acosta Chris, you're exactly correct. Thank you for clarifying for Lakaron
Sure thing. Thanks for the insightful videos!
thank you
😍😍 Thannnnk you
Where do we download the slides to go along with the video? I really think they would be useful but I cant figure out where to find them. Please someone let me know!
i wish i could give more starssss
thanks sir
awesome
Applicable
Sir please give more examples of this topic
I'm sorry but this is all I have.
where is the next part
😃😃😃😃😃😁😁😁😁👏👏👏👏👏👏👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Why is the cyclohexane a "HIM?" Are you saying women don't have the same opportunities to become cyclohexanes as men? SO SEXIST