6.3 How to find moment-components of an equivalent couple in 3D

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 дек 2024

Комментарии • 18

  • @sahel5896
    @sahel5896 2 года назад

    This is best explanation of engineering mechanics concepts 👍, thanks a lot.
    Please make videos on other topics also like virtual work and all the other mechanics topics

  • @anthonylamotta4889
    @anthonylamotta4889 3 года назад

    love method 3! never saw this before

  • @najihahabdrazak9492
    @najihahabdrazak9492 4 года назад +2

    hi, for method 3. Why must we attach two equal & opposite direction forces of 100N? Can it be 150N?

    • @VectorInMotion
      @VectorInMotion  4 года назад +1

      Hi,
      No, you can't add 150 N forces. The idea behind adding 100 N forces is to create two couples of 100 N forces instead of one.
      Compare method 3 with method 2 ==> In method 2, there is a single couple with forces lying on an inclined plane (formed by the two forces and the line DE) and so its moment vector is normal to this plane. You've to use little imagination and trigonometry to resolve this moment vector along coordinate axes so that you can then add it to another moment vector.
      Method 3 makes the solution easier... no trigonometry stuff ... By adding 100 N forces at point A, you build two couples instead of one. What's the advantage? You can easily visualize that the couple moments are along y and z axes. No new concept... little manipulation of vectors to either cut down on 'time to solve' or lessen visualization stress.
      Hope this helps!

    • @najihahabdrazak9492
      @najihahabdrazak9492 4 года назад +1

      @@VectorInMotion Such a good explanation! I appreciate the help. Keep making amazing videos!! :)

  • @ikahtube2865
    @ikahtube2865 3 года назад

    thank you very much
    for method 3

  • @kylerlindo346
    @kylerlindo346 8 месяцев назад

    For Method #1 I THINK it should be -60i + -30j + 20k please let me know if I'm wrong. Thank you for your help.

    • @johnmwebela2226
      @johnmwebela2226 8 месяцев назад

      No you are wrong you multiply the j components by a negative

    • @VectorInMotion
      @VectorInMotion  8 месяцев назад

      Yes, that is incorrect. The expression given in the video is the correct one.

  • @ikahtube2865
    @ikahtube2865 3 года назад

    but i need further explanation the difference between the resultant couple and resultant mument about any point

    • @VectorInMotion
      @VectorInMotion  3 года назад

      You may like to watch this video ruclips.net/video/XNGi73GZ_YA/видео.html (basic concepts of couples) to clear your doubts. Moment of a force/couple is the tendency to rotate the body on which it acts. A couple is simply a pair of equal forces but oppositely directed.

  • @ayamwenzdayz3551
    @ayamwenzdayz3551 Год назад

    in the first method n, why is the 100 N force negative

    • @VectorInMotion
      @VectorInMotion  Год назад

      Hi Ayam: That is so because the 100 N force acting at point E points in negative x-direction. So in vector form you'll write -100 i. Hope that clarifies the matter.

  • @PANKAJKUMAR-ob4hr
    @PANKAJKUMAR-ob4hr 4 года назад +1

    Super sir

  • @kaursingh637
    @kaursingh637 3 года назад

    my lord -excellent excelent excelent -- writing is very very small -eye strain

    • @VectorInMotion
      @VectorInMotion  3 года назад

      Good you pointed it out. Shall keep in mind in future.

  • @PANKAJKUMAR-ob4hr
    @PANKAJKUMAR-ob4hr 4 года назад

    I love it

    • @VectorInMotion
      @VectorInMotion  4 года назад

      Hi Pankaj; Thanks for your comments and I'm glad you find it useful.