Franklin had an undeniable favour with others in the great twentieth century achievement . Unfortunately she died early very young before more valuable research and unveiling and discovering a lot especially about viruses like tobacco one and about materials as coal and graphite and others . These scientists efforts and lives are very much lighting human life and are inspiring and providing an ever guidance and lessons for many generations to come
remember: In any reputable debate one side has the right to the other side for the source of a fact. I would like to ask for yours on the fact that you just stated.
The new yellow square on my screen above 12 point symbol to upper right, is primitivecool in one of several point(s) of view so more about first impressions later + or g+ enveloping so much more global perspective which is what some of us seek while "Exploration of Knowledge" may hold a key. The key
@ramron333 she did not believe DNA was of a helical structure nor was she involved in helping deciphering the structure. She should get some credit, but not as much as Watson & Crick. Read "The double helix" by Watson. You'll find that Rosalind is an interesting character.
absolue layover and ~ (smile) from knowledge of Francis Crick, such awareness does exist in relation to consciousness, for example sake, of pain when conscious as opposed to pain, or the striking of neurons, when unconscious; so for pleasing me and knowledge of what the late Francis Crick being such 1962 Nobel Laureate in: In what is essential for me (borrowing 'echoalia' from Vonnegut so the red underline does not apply here when typing and the machine or chip processor does not get it? Or ~kc
@suddenlyitsobvious You're wrong if you think all scientists have the same views or beliefs. What matters at the end of the day is testable, verifiable results, not one man's beliefs about the relation of race and intelligence. Be reasonable and think things through.
@suddenlyitsobvious which is why we can look at the work and disregard everything else, results matter. The mechanism for a successful scientific institution is to publish findings. There are many independent labs working towards the same goal. There is a huge peer review process before anything comes remotely close to being called scientific theory. There is no general scientific consensus with Race and Intelligence. Are you intentionally trying to skew things?
Francis: Believe in Jesus ]Christ and be saved you and your house (Acts 16:31 Your Bible) Francis: Cree en el Señor Jesucristo y serás salvo tú y tu casa (Hechos 16:31 Tu Biblia)
@tonybonez not only will i tell you the source of the fact i just stated but i'll also wrap that up in a little white box with a little red bow on it and send it to you for christmas, lol
@gunman806 NO NO NO!!! that's fucking wrong! you probably read this from wiki, which isn't always right. An athiest believes, or possess the belief that there is not a god. An "agnostic" on the other hand has no belief system toward believing in a god or dis believing in a one. Agnostics, like myself, acknowledge that we simply don't know if there is a god or not because there is not enough evidence to prove either side...
![Gunna - HIM ALL ALONG [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/w7Wf0h1Q8a4/mqdefault.jpg)
Nick was my professor and Crick is one of my favorite scientists of all time. It is exciting to see them together here.
Franklin had an undeniable favour with others in the great twentieth century achievement . Unfortunately she died early very young before more valuable research and unveiling and discovering a lot especially about viruses like tobacco one and about materials as coal and graphite and others . These scientists efforts and lives are very much lighting human life and are inspiring and providing an ever guidance and lessons for many generations to come
Crick has the perfect narrator voice
Fantastic Tache!
'Nick Spitzer' even spells a bit like 'Nietzsche'.
Crick was a great brain scholar.
remember: In any reputable debate one side has the right to the other side for the source of a fact.
I would like to ask for yours on the fact that you just stated.
That legendary mustache.
The new yellow square on my screen above 12 point symbol to upper right, is primitivecool in one of several point(s) of view so more about first impressions later + or g+ enveloping so much more global perspective which is what some of us seek while "Exploration of Knowledge" may hold a key. The key
Nietzsche talking to Crick in English. Am I hallucinating?
What is the name of the greek scientist that F.C. mentions in 19:36?
@ramron333 she did not believe DNA was of a helical structure nor was she involved in helping deciphering the structure. She should get some credit, but not as much as Watson & Crick. Read "The double helix" by Watson. You'll find that Rosalind is an interesting character.
Franklin did get some credit. She was mentioned in the Watson and Crick paper in Nature.
Hm, no. Where did you get that idea? @ tonybonez
LOL. The interviewer looks like Fredrich Nietzche.
I reaslised that too!
absolue layover and ~ (smile) from knowledge of Francis Crick, such awareness does exist in relation to consciousness, for example sake, of pain when conscious as opposed to pain, or the striking of neurons, when unconscious; so for pleasing me and knowledge of what the late Francis Crick being such 1962 Nobel Laureate in: In what is essential for me (borrowing 'echoalia' from Vonnegut so the red underline does not apply here when typing and the machine or chip processor does not get it? Or ~kc
Yeah, and it goes far beyond that road-kill mustache; look at a photo of ol' Fred -the resemblance is nothing short of uncanny.
hellsing piano theme!? sound similar!!! I know not the same....but just sounds similar.
what an odd looking group of seniors, its even creepier that were all gonna look like them one day
+Prince Broly not if you die of cancer at 46.
Or die in an accident because of drunk driving, I give him 35 .
rip to a great mind
WTF has this got to do with Monica Zetterlund singing jazz
@suddenlyitsobvious You're wrong if you think all scientists have the same views or beliefs. What matters at the end of the day is testable, verifiable results, not one man's beliefs about the relation of race and intelligence. Be reasonable and think things through.
Nobody can figure out how human brain de and remapping itself to survive.:(
@suddenlyitsobvious which is why we can look at the work and disregard everything else, results matter. The mechanism for a successful scientific institution is to publish findings. There are many independent labs working towards the same goal. There is a huge peer review process before anything comes remotely close to being called scientific theory. There is no general scientific consensus with Race and Intelligence. Are you intentionally trying to skew things?
No, you won't find many molecular biologists that do.
Francis: Believe in Jesus ]Christ and be saved you and your house (Acts 16:31 Your Bible) Francis: Cree en el Señor Jesucristo y serás salvo tú y tu casa (Hechos 16:31 Tu Biblia)
@tonybonez no i don't think so, he is an athiest. no atheist denies evolution
seems that Nick ate a swallow and the wings got stuck in his lips!
Does Dr. Crick deny evolution????
@tonybonez not only will i tell you the source of the fact i just stated but i'll also wrap that up in a little white box with a little red bow on it and send it to you for christmas, lol
he found it whilst experimenting with lsd
Nonsense, he did not. Read James Watson's book 'The Double Helix' before you come out with such idiocy..
when you have done more reasearch you can apologise ,,,,,,,,,,and i suppose next your gonna say he didnt belive in panspermia
@gunman806 NO NO NO!!! that's fucking wrong! you probably read this from wiki, which isn't always right.
An athiest believes, or possess the belief that there is not a god. An "agnostic" on the other hand has no belief system toward believing in a god or dis believing in a one. Agnostics, like myself, acknowledge that we simply don't know if there is a god or not because there is not enough evidence to prove either side...
enough to make one puke.
Mmm hmm.
the only device than can know mind is mind. Look within. The mind is not a structure.
"the mind is not a structure"? meaning what?
@suddenlyitsobvious you are absolutely clueless. Books are not only good for burning...
essentailly, who gives a fuck anyways . It is what it is homeboy