Climate scientists give "survival guide for humanity" in landmark UN report

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 мар 2023
  • "There's a rapidly closing window to secure a liveable future" , scientists say.
    (Subscribe: bit.ly/C4_News_Subscribe)
    The UN Chief Antonio Guterres has welcomed the sixth major report by the world's leading climate experts, setting out ways to curb greenhouse gas emissions - describing it as a "survival guide for humanity".
    -----------------------
    Follow us on Instagram - / channel4news

Комментарии • 680

  • @quinonesbooks8512
    @quinonesbooks8512 Год назад +57

    If you have any hope for the future read through the comments of this or any similar video and you’ll be cured of your optimism.

    • @acc8004
      @acc8004 Год назад +10

      with this comments section maybe a mass extinction isn't so bad?

    • @russellmania5349
      @russellmania5349 Год назад

      @@acc8004
      I got some really good news climate change is a scam.

    • @freshprince3891
      @freshprince3891 Год назад

      Why don't you stay at home and help the climate, bet you stayed at home looking like this 😷 aswell didn't you.

  • @mep.stance1210
    @mep.stance1210 Год назад +52

    We're right on track to becoming another five inch sediment layer in Earth's geological record

    • @firstname4865
      @firstname4865 Год назад

      So you're saying i should withdraw all my investments because we're all going to die anyway? ....wonder why the elite haven't done that

    • @johnrandall125
      @johnrandall125 Год назад +1

      And when the new ice age comes places like Toronto in Canada it will be under several thousand metres of ice. Good luck with chipping that lot away.

    • @stephensharp975
      @stephensharp975 Год назад +3

      @@johnrandall125 and your source for your scientific study is where êxactly,,,,,

    • @lacusrengoku5087
      @lacusrengoku5087 Год назад

      really appreciate your humor!

    • @RobertMJohnson
      @RobertMJohnson Год назад

      why are you so f arrogant? you don't have a clue what the future holds.

  • @geoffdreill1925
    @geoffdreill1925 Год назад +93

    Incredible, almost all of the comments on this video are absurd. Well done everyone.

    • @strakermidwich9679
      @strakermidwich9679 Год назад +19

      Just like the Climate crisis nonsense

    • @allisonsteenson3035
      @allisonsteenson3035 Год назад +9

      Yep. And that's how we are where we are now (i.e. quite fucked, if anybody still had any doubt).

    • @LonelyGothGirl
      @LonelyGothGirl Год назад

      I love how these dumbass blue collar Trump supporting conservatives who have no formal education think they know more about climate science then actual scientists.

    • @ianhamilton3113
      @ianhamilton3113 Год назад +16

      @@strakermidwich9679 How do I get pay-outs from Exon like you are? Is it easy to apply?

    • @strakermidwich9679
      @strakermidwich9679 Год назад

      @@ianhamilton3113 Yeah you just need common sense which isn't so common for people like you!

  • @WhateverHappenedToGaryCooper
    @WhateverHappenedToGaryCooper Год назад +83

    If the climate was so dire they’d call an end to all wars, they’d stop flying private jets if only to set good examples, they stop buying up all of the beach front property - again if only to show us that we are all in this fight together

    • @888ssss
      @888ssss Год назад +8

      please just give them your money. no questions buddy..

    • @phillheth
      @phillheth Год назад +9

      Imagine the world view you have to have to believe the above statement. amazing.

    • @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885
      @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 Год назад +5

      don't worry. If you don't do anything Mother Nature will still take care of the problem! Even if you tried to do something - it's way too late now. If you really want to know how bad things are then just dig deep into the science! Pretty fascinating really. The whole "policy" stuff is nothing compared to the science. Don't get distracted by the policy makers since they don't really know the science.

    • @sosig8332
      @sosig8332 Год назад +1

      Big changes coming, great reset will take affect this year you should look up what that means its all falling into place.

    • @888ssss
      @888ssss Год назад

      @@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 lol chicken little...

  • @penbee9316
    @penbee9316 Год назад +16

    The war in Ukraine isn’t using renewable.

    • @orange1666
      @orange1666 Год назад

      Or Syria , or Yemen , or Taiwan maybe next , the yanks have 900 bases around the world for one reason - to create war and profit from such

    • @ericcaslake2749
      @ericcaslake2749 Год назад

      yes the are there electric tanks and they reuse the bombs 😂

    • @englishsteve1465
      @englishsteve1465 Год назад

      How very perceptive of you, well done. But please, can you tell us why the worlds glaciers are all shrinking at a rate unheard of before ? and why are the hundreds of thousands of miles of Canadian "permafrost" melting and unknown virus's emerging ?
      Hint - the clue is in the name, PERMAfrost, as in thought to be permanent, geddit ?

    • @jameshealwriter
      @jameshealwriter Год назад +1

      But Russia is using renewable soldiers and a lot of them 😂

    • @therealkindle5365
      @therealkindle5365 Год назад

      There isn't any meaning besides an attempt to disassociate the threat to you personally in your facetious comment.

  • @mikejoshtaylor
    @mikejoshtaylor Год назад +10

    So not convinced!

    • @sosig8332
      @sosig8332 Год назад +2

      "Its easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled"
      Applies to this comment.

  • @patrick247two
    @patrick247two Год назад +23

    We all need to learn how to get by on 95% less stuff.

    • @KHETTIUS
      @KHETTIUS Год назад +3

      Yes eat ze bugs and own absolutely nothing, be happy being a serf with absolutely no rights.

    • @django3422
      @django3422 Год назад

      ​@@KHETTIUS I detect a hint of sarcasm. What's your solution, then?

    • @firstname4865
      @firstname4865 Год назад

      That would include Internet and phones

    • @firstname4865
      @firstname4865 Год назад +1

      ​@@KHETTIUSoh you can count on it, the poor will suffer under policies and the rich who are doing all the damage will keep on living the same lifestyle because they'll still have plenty of money

    • @therealkindle5365
      @therealkindle5365 Год назад

      OR push to create a sustainable emergent system of global abundance which uses renewable energy sources demonstrated by *The Venus Project* for the last 50 years!! Doesn't take much to ask questions & look into things a bit my dude!

  • @silentthunderbird3390
    @silentthunderbird3390 Год назад +4

    yet, the world is still busy with wars...

  • @stanleykubrick8786
    @stanleykubrick8786 Год назад +2

    The great news is that fertility rates are plummeting, which will lead to a reprieve on the population stress that humans are inflicting on Earth.

  • @ahsanjavaid4588
    @ahsanjavaid4588 Год назад +3

    Remember as a kid when al gore said the coastal cities would be flooded by 2020.. then himself bought a ocean facing mansion with all the funds from the documentary. Google it. I want to be that kind of activist

    • @hosnimubarak8869
      @hosnimubarak8869 Год назад

      Al Gore's ocean view property in Montecito CA is 2 miles back from the beach and 500 feet above sea level.
      You can vie it by searching for, “Virtual globetrotting map, Al Gore’s house in Montecito CA”

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад

      Typical of “climate skeptics” and deniers bring up folk like Kerry, Gore or DiCaprio, which are not scientists. It only demonstrates your apathy about findings from actual climate scientists.
      I get it, bringing up ocean facing mansions and private jets are important for raising resentment among the regressive rubes.

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад

      Typical of “climate skeptics” and deniers bringing up folk like Kerry, Gore or DiCaprio, which are not scientists. It only demonstrates their apathy about findings from actual climate scientists. I get it, bringing up ocean facing mansions and private jets are important for raising resentment among the regressive rubes.

  • @KingNothing100
    @KingNothing100 Год назад +8

    It's ok, we've got paper straws now, oooop what's that sound? Ohhh it China knocking up another coal fired power station.

  • @mariamossberg
    @mariamossberg Год назад +2

    I think it is important to begin fining companies who don't follow policies about not polluting. I don't think a simple recommendation (a policy without legal consequenses will suffice). Good luck to us 🌱

  • @oniricPrj
    @oniricPrj Год назад +6

    there's still smiles while talking..still very slight frowns, as if it's something not so dramatic, after all.

    • @firstname4865
      @firstname4865 Год назад

      Just like covid, its so bad you see dead bodies all over the street, oh wait

    • @kjm437
      @kjm437 Год назад

      keep saying it’s not ‘so dramatic’ when the natural disasters and diseases hit you and your loved ones in the near future. just because it hasnt affected you drastically yet, doesn’t mean that famine, droughts, flooding, dead animals and irreversable damage aren’t coming to Mother Earth and by extension all of us humans, not just those living in poverty and third world countries. oh wait, haven’t they already started, ever heard of the Australian and California bushfires?

    • @kjm437
      @kjm437 Год назад +1

      those smiles are a facade, trying to not bring everyone down because then instead of fighting for our futures, we’d just get all depressed and give up. hope is inspiring, and so much hope can start from a smile

    • @oniricPrj
      @oniricPrj Год назад +1

      @@kjm437 I would love it if a smile and hope could change things but all my life I've seen that and it simply doesn't work. things in history have changed when people got fed up and protested.

    • @kjm437
      @kjm437 Год назад +1

      @@oniricPrj thats very true, hope doesn’t always make people want change, but neither does mass nihilism due to a lack of it, anger on the other hand though…

  • @LarryCleveland
    @LarryCleveland Год назад +1

    How do you say wasf without saying wasf?
    There won't be any historians.

  • @aland5478
    @aland5478 Год назад +3

    Well its true. This story has no baring on the big picture. Our emotions and emissions are rising ever year. Plus we are running towards the precipice. Lemmon's have more change when we do.
    I think Guy was right with his ten years to extinction. That was 5 years ago!

    • @volkerengels5298
      @volkerengels5298 10 месяцев назад

      No - he always claimed, that people keep mentally stable as they become aware their near term extinction. Obviously wrong.
      Overall - yes he got it in time.

  • @belkentens
    @belkentens Год назад +3

    Build more housing estates on farmland!!!

    • @Greenranger123
      @Greenranger123 Год назад

      your not very smart are you thatll just cause more co2 to go in the atmosphere and itll also stop farmers who we depend on from looking after our crops for basically everything

    • @englishsteve1465
      @englishsteve1465 Год назад

      Yeah, sup up yer beer an collect your fags, there's a row goin' on down near Slough !
      Edit - where'd ya get the Kes piccy ? love it 🤔

    • @OnlyGrafting
      @OnlyGrafting Год назад +1

      Based. Not like we need food are anything

  • @phillyblunts1644
    @phillyblunts1644 Год назад +4

    Some would say they are being lit on purpose

  • @kennethmaley2443
    @kennethmaley2443 Год назад +3

    funny he say every country dose this include china and india

    • @ianhamilton3113
      @ianhamilton3113 Год назад

      Where do you think all our solar panels are being made?

  • @sherpalou
    @sherpalou Год назад +3

    The vast majority of us can look outside and see that the planet is not burning.

  • @jimmyfaulkner5746
    @jimmyfaulkner5746 Год назад +12

    What about vaccine harms , the unexpected consequence of the last mass hysteria narrative

    • @chrisj2502
      @chrisj2502 Год назад +1

      Parliament quickly emptied when that was spoken about

    • @jimmyfaulkner5746
      @jimmyfaulkner5746 Год назад

      Rats fleeing a sinking ship

  • @pauljones1288
    @pauljones1288 Год назад +9

    Lies, lies, lies!

  • @paleocon777
    @paleocon777 Год назад +7

    Associated press 1989:
    "A UN environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth if rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000"
    😂

    • @fxsaltwater
      @fxsaltwater Год назад +3

      well, look at the pacific and Indian Ocean .... they are. And if you're doubting the accuracy of these reports: don't you think it's fair to say that the technological advancement of those past 36 years that now allows you to watch a video on RUclips and comment on that in an instant on the flip side means that scientist can now be more precise in terms of time and severity with their predictions?

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад +2

      Note "could".
      Plus the statement didn't come from a climate scientist, which was referenced from papers in the works; tnone of these scientific papers asserted that nations could or would be wiped off the face of the earth by 2000.

    • @paleocon777
      @paleocon777 Год назад

      @@rps1689
      Note: never happened

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад +2

      @@paleocon777 Irrelevant, as no scientist nor scientist in main stream climate science ever made the prediction or claim that any city would wiped off the face of the earth.

    • @RobertMJohnson
      @RobertMJohnson Год назад

      leftists don't understand when they are being played

  • @StressRUs
    @StressRUs 4 месяца назад

    Global heating is smacking us in the face and we just keep burning 8 billion tons of coal per year, and 100million barrels of oil per day, producing the heat equivalent of 1,149,120 Hiroshima yield nuclear bomb blasts per day. What could go wrong? Everything?

  • @sharongillesp
    @sharongillesp Год назад +1

    NO ELECTRIC CARS!!!
    STOP thinking we’ll solve the problem with BUYING MORE STUFF.
    What we need is better transportation AND rezoning so that “appropriate” businesses for daily needs and interests are built within neighborhoods to greatly reduce the need for cars. Multi-transportation where people can easily bike, walk or use public transportation to get to the grocery store, shop, get to work, go to school, and meet up with friends. Limiting car use.
    Less car dependent MORE walkable communities, which by the way are FAR MORE PROFITABLE than big-box stores (Walmart, huge department stores, etc) to cities.
    Get rid of these dead zoned neighborhoods (with row after row of cars, driveways and asphalt) where you literally have to take a car to get anywhere.
    FYI: SUVs are dangerous, gas guzzlers and should be outlawed.

  • @knallhardt
    @knallhardt Год назад

    Thank you for the video. For minute 5:06, I would like to hear more about the impacts of climatte change and can we realy avoid it? Because there are already impacts of climate change. Iam thinking about a discussion with him, more experts, victims, witnesses (without special knowlege for climate) and so on. Interessting gueats could be Prof Schellnhuber, Dr Bennicke, Andri Magnason, Prof Lenton, Dr Rockström). Just an idea. Maybe it will grow.

  • @commonsense3222
    @commonsense3222 Год назад +17

    SORRY Channel 4 but your fear mongering and bias and the reporting of Covid gives us little faith in your journalistic skills and embracing this story from the mouthpiece of the WEF as well extremely liberal left biased stance of your news stories only cements the disappointment of your "news" reporting

  • @rahimmiah7575
    @rahimmiah7575 Год назад +1

    What about government officials flying in private jets. Celebrities flying private jets?

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад +1

      Private jets should be taxed to the ground, but I get it, at times private jets are important for raising resentment among the regressive rubes.
      The global aviation industry produces around 2.1% of all human-induced carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.
      Aviation is responsible for 12% of CO2 emissions from all transports sources, compared to 74% from road transport.

  • @branislavtrninic4505
    @branislavtrninic4505 Год назад +12

    The problem with this planet is that it is full of humans

    • @sandradixon6205
      @sandradixon6205 Год назад

      If it’s left up to humans and their governments to reduce damaging emissions, it will never happen. The warnings have been given over and over for so many years but as always they fall on deaf ears. While the motive to make a lot of money overrides everything else, greedy people will continue to destroy our beautiful planet. However, our Creator has a purpose for us and the earth, so very shortly he is going to make drastic changes to the rulership of the earth. His heavenly Kingdom government is poised to remove and replace all existing human governments which have failed miserably to care for the needs of each one of their citizens. (Daniel 2:44) Each day the world reels from one disaster to another causing untold suffering. God’s Kingdom government will not only undo all the harm caused by incompetent and wicked people but it will bring true peace and security to all of earth’s inhabitants. All mankind will be completely united in peace, love, and harmony. Psalm 37:10, 11, 29 says: “Just a little while longer and the wicked will be no more; you will look at where they were, and they will not be there. But the meek will possess the earth, and they will find exquisite delight in the abundance of peace”.

    • @therealkindle5365
      @therealkindle5365 Год назад

      The problem is the *system* which Governs humanity. Change the system, we change the behavior & the effects.

    • @OnlyGrafting
      @OnlyGrafting Год назад +1

      ​@@therealkindle5365 right ok tell us how we tackle the CCP, Indian and American governments? I'm all for toppling the three of them back into the feudal system.

    • @branislavtrninic4505
      @branislavtrninic4505 Год назад

      @@therealkindle5365 that is what Marx said

    • @therealkindle5365
      @therealkindle5365 Год назад

      @@branislavtrninic4505 Communism uses Money, Banks, Prisons, Police, Armies, Navies, Ruler-ship, etc. An RBE has none of those. Most people have been indoctrinated to resist change and associate any suggestion of such to the worst case Scenario. Or the other old chestnut.. "Utopia"! It takes a certain degree of intellect to give something due consideration.

  • @bitcoincryptofreedom3652
    @bitcoincryptofreedom3652 Год назад +1

    I'll stick to driving my hummer h2 and mustang thanks 👍

  • @stephaniewaters1777
    @stephaniewaters1777 Год назад +11

    When you release hundreds of millions of years of stored carbon into the atmosphere in just a few centuries, the carbon levels increase.
    Carbon gases retain heat. High levels of carbon in the atmosphere cause the atmosphere to warm up.
    Heat is a type of energy. Warmer atmosphere means more energy is available to drive weather events - warmer atmosphere means more severe weather events happening more often. That's more floods, droughts, heatwave, coldwaves, cyclones.
    Hope that helps for anyone not familiar with climate change

    • @apollo2276
      @apollo2276 Год назад +1

      Unfortunately I think it's you that isn't familiar with the situation we are facing today.
      It's not climate change that is driving the drastic weather patterns we see. Its weather manipulation and many globally have the evidence to prove that this is going on.
      So while they are controlling our weather to create storms, droughts etc, they are at the same time selling the public a pack of lies to justify all the bs policies they want to force on humanity.
      Ice drills, science etc proves everything they are saying not to be true.
      And regarding science. C02 particle gravity is heavier that air. So would you like to explain to the world how c02 gets into the atmosphere?
      It can't ! Its subjected to the same laws of gravity as everything else is.
      I'd change your sourse of information my friend. Clearly you are just repeating what the climate change criminals tell the world.

    • @johnnylatham9738
      @johnnylatham9738 Год назад +1

      Yes and it's been going on for millions of years,fluctuations ,but yes of course,we need to stop environmental abuse and exploitation, but they need to be be honest with the science..and the narrative

    • @hosnimubarak8869
      @hosnimubarak8869 Год назад +2

      @@apollo2276
      Wow apollo... If you are trying to prove you're a nutter you nailed it.

    • @NiklasHansen-pf3ry
      @NiklasHansen-pf3ry Год назад

      No, earths increase depend on the father/mother-root, in science its the sun, in religion it's God, not to tell you what to believe, but you dont even walk straight on yer own path..

    • @wiegershitpostcollective
      @wiegershitpostcollective Год назад +1

      ​@@NiklasHansen-pf3rygod wont save you or your children of whats to come, you will suffer and there is nothing you'll do about it

  • @ellensamir374
    @ellensamir374 Год назад +1

    Batteries are not pollution free. Do hydrogen pls.

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад

      Hydrogen fuel cells are not limited by Carnot's Rule which is why it is likely to become an option for large mobile applications like cargo ships and locomotives and cargo ships; denser and more scalable than batteries. For small mobile systems, lithium batteries now, silicon or graphene batteries in a few years.
      One of the problems with a hydrogen transportation industry is it takes more energy to compress a commercially useful quantity of hydrogen to fit a practical storage tank than you get out of it by burning it in the fuel cell later. Same problem with compressed air. Commercial grid scale compressed air storage systems capture the heat from compression and store it along side the compressed air. Then they use it to warm up the air at decompression time. This added complexity almost triples their efficiency, from around 25% to around 75%. You don't get to do that with a hydrogen fuel tank in a vehicle.

  • @ashleighnoel9857
    @ashleighnoel9857 Год назад +1

    Just stop oil 🧡

  • @RobertFalconer1967
    @RobertFalconer1967 Год назад +1

    First of all, getting off fossil fuels entirely is a pipe dream for the foreseeable future, because major industries require a level of energy density year round that cannot even remotely be powered by wind, solar, etc. Also, the world's militaries are never going to run on wind and solar, and the US military alone is one of the single biggest carbon emitters on the planet.
    Moreover, corporate interests and corporate profiteering will also not allow this, and since corporations have captured most governments in the Western world through lobbying and "campaign contributions" (otherwise known as legalized bribery), no real legislation will ever be approved to support the sort of green agenda that would be essential to make a meaningful dent in carbon emissions.
    And don't get me started on EVs. Ever looked at the entire life-cycle of an EV? They emit just as much carbon as an ICE vehicle over their lifespan. They amount to a feel good measure-foisted onto a public who can scarcely afford them-while in reality make a difference about as significant as tossing bricks in the Grand Canyon.
    The only way to fix the climate crisis immediately is to completely shut down our civilization as it exists today, and devise a new one. But, of course, that's never going to happen.
    Realistically, the only hope now for mankind is new forms of reactors, be they technologies like salt reactors...or, hopefully, fusion power. Until that time, we're all going to have to get used to a warming planet - unless you want to start a violent revolution to overthrow governments and corporate interests.

  • @sislertx
    @sislertx Год назад +6

    And only if.china india do it...all other countries have!!!!

    • @currentaf8455
      @currentaf8455 Год назад +1

      Look into per capita emissions. That should be the criteria.

    • @ianhamilton3113
      @ianhamilton3113 Год назад

      If you care to check the data you will discover just how dumb it is to make a statement without checking.

    • @firstname4865
      @firstname4865 Год назад

      ​@@currentaf8455anyone who believes in climate change would never have children, as population is the real cause. So when I see them all having children, I know they're talking ****

  • @djtechnique
    @djtechnique Год назад +8

    There was little normal people could do to save the world.

    • @sandradixon6205
      @sandradixon6205 Год назад

      If it’s left up to humans and their governments to reduce damaging emissions, it will never happen. The warnings have been given over and over for so many years but as always they fall on deaf ears. While the motive to make a lot of money overrides everything else, greedy people will continue to destroy our beautiful planet. However, our Creator has a purpose for us and the earth, so very shortly he is going to make drastic changes to the rulership of the earth. His heavenly Kingdom government is poised to remove and replace all existing human governments which have failed miserably to care for the needs of each one of their citizens. (Daniel 2:44) Each day the world reels from one disaster to another causing untold suffering. God’s Kingdom government will not only undo all the harm caused by incompetent and wicked people but it will bring true peace and security to all of earth’s inhabitants. All mankind will be completely united in peace, love, and harmony. Psalm 37:10, 11, 29 says: “Just a little while longer and the wicked will be no more; you will look at where they were, and they will not be there. But the meek will possess the earth, and they will find exquisite delight in the abundance of peace”.

    • @thebigpicture2032
      @thebigpicture2032 Год назад +1

      Actually normal people have all the power if they organize. Imagine if everyone just stopped buying cheap disposable junk or just stopped eating meat or just said no to air travel. That’s something everyone could do and it would actually save them money.

    • @brandonfitzgerald8831
      @brandonfitzgerald8831 Год назад

      ​@@thebigpicture2032I already knew some of that

    • @russellmania5349
      @russellmania5349 Год назад +1

      @@thebigpicture2032
      I bet you all the politicians that talk about climate change are not going to give up their private jets.

    • @lacusrengoku5087
      @lacusrengoku5087 Год назад

      that's what I thought as well

  • @bullywags397
    @bullywags397 Год назад

    Can't she go on GB News an explain it?

  • @SuperKiller374
    @SuperKiller374 Год назад +11

    Propaganda

    • @jgreen9361
      @jgreen9361 Месяц назад

      Ask yourself “for who”. It’s not just the science and peoples observations of the real world disagree with you, it’s the fact that the climate denial sound bites don’t make any sense. The BBC has been part of the bullshit, by actually tolerating denial as a counter argument. For the last 50 years there should have been a debate, a debate about pace of action and the priority order. It’s like seeing a burning building and instead of debating the course of action, having an idiot deny that it’s on fire and having to humour them.

  • @Wolfways
    @Wolfways Год назад

    Where's Klaatu when you need him?

  • @FourLightsOfficial
    @FourLightsOfficial Год назад +9

    Guide for humanity: only fly private to climate change conventions (or anywhere else) and do what you like if you can "offset" your carbon.

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад

      Brings to mind those that boycotted the COP27, which was a farce. Basically a greenwashing festival with more oil lobbyists and show biz celebrities attending than scientists, and pretty much nobody listening to the scientists.
      Private jets need to be taxed to the ground; but I get it; private jets are important for raising resentment among the regressive rubes.
      The global aviation industry produces around 2.1% of all human-induced carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Aviation is responsible for 12% of CO2 emissions from all transports sources, compared to 74% from road transport.

    • @garnhamr
      @garnhamr Год назад

      Also build $50,000,000 houses next to the sea and then tell everyone to worry about rising sea levels

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад

      @@garnhamr I get it, seaside properties and private jets are important for raising resentment among the regressive rubes.

  • @RighteousRage
    @RighteousRage Год назад

    Lawl

  • @Lone432345
    @Lone432345 10 месяцев назад

    Without watching the video, Let me guess what in the Report. "Where all Doomed, The sky is falling, Repent now."

  • @tara7125
    @tara7125 Год назад +2

    So upsetting. Please email your local politicians.

  • @stephenwalker2924
    @stephenwalker2924 Год назад +1

    Great. We all now know how to save the planet. We are just not going to do it. Lovely.

    • @therealkindle5365
      @therealkindle5365 Год назад +1

      I care not for you opinions. Not a single being on this earth knows the future before it happens. So you only reveal your ignorance with such a presumptuous statement.

  • @1_in_8billion
    @1_in_8billion 7 месяцев назад

    We're not gonna make it... are we?

  • @supersasquatch
    @supersasquatch 11 месяцев назад

    Is he the passive aggressive guy who interviewed Robert Downey Jr ?

  • @lacusrengoku5087
    @lacusrengoku5087 Год назад +4

    Well, at this state of the planet, I have basically given up......

    • @NiklasHansen-pf3ry
      @NiklasHansen-pf3ry Год назад +1

      Weak excuse, you weeentvgoing to do anything to begin with, if yes.. then grow your own food and cut out processed and oppose extra green taxes upfront..

    • @nathanmartin8393
      @nathanmartin8393 Год назад

      Just live your life. Nothing will happen. These people are nuts

    • @evelina733
      @evelina733 Год назад

      What about things that are already happening?

  • @glennt1962
    @glennt1962 7 месяцев назад

    Saudi Arabian Oil Co. (Saudi Aramco) $1.8 trillion mcap and
    ExxonMobil with a market cap of $406 billion going to listen?

  • @musicislife-qc5ix
    @musicislife-qc5ix Год назад +1

    Nonsense

  • @Gringohuevon
    @Gringohuevon Год назад +6

    who's the spotty kid saying the science is "fairly settled"?

    • @cestparti7577
      @cestparti7577 Год назад +1

      Fairy tails more like "

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад

      Well the enhanced greenhouse effect is settled. The 0.2C per decade global warming since 1980 is settled. 
The insignificant decline in solar energy output since 1980 is settled.
 The 1.1C global warming since 1880 is settled. 
These are observed effects, consistent with physical theory.

      If you or anyone else had data that can back up that human emissions are not driving the current climate trend and refute the anthropogenic origin of the 49% enhancement in atmospheric CO2 since 1800, you would be famous and the next big name since Einstein; you’d be famous as some one that could refute the propagation of light in a vacuum or thermodynamics.
      Anthropogenic global warming is hardly the most important or interesting area of climate research because it is occurring and is settled. i.e., it’s a baseline. Just as evolution is the baseline for evolutionary biology.

  • @rb1062
    @rb1062 Год назад +9

    They've been predicting disaster for ever!

    • @GG-wc4xk
      @GG-wc4xk Год назад

      Are you not seeing disaster outside as we speak ? It’s ok it will get to the point when you can’t deny it but even then. You might die denying, it’s easier right?

    • @therealkindle5365
      @therealkindle5365 Год назад +2

      Just because it doesn't suddenly happen in the time frame of your attention span doesn't mean its not an emergency!

    • @OnlyGrafting
      @OnlyGrafting Год назад +2

      ​@@therealkindle5365 10 years ago they said 10 years. This window will close and they'll declare another window. It's fucking silly.

    • @isolationnationn
      @isolationnationn Год назад +1

      @@OnlyGrafting No, "they" didn't... Your inability to understand the detail isn't a reason for ignoring what people who *do* understand say.

    • @kynchan3332
      @kynchan3332 Год назад

      ​@@isolationnationn The people who understand want money and higher taxes. The sheep are stupid. You can easily install solar panels if you wanted to, build rechargeable batteries if you wanted to (they don't need to be made from lithium, iron and nickel are abundantly available), you could plant trees on the hills (where it is difficult to farm), you could grow some of your own food (start with herbs on the window sill as an easy project) etc. The twats in power want your money and want to keep people ignorant via the means of fear with messages of only we can help you, when you are more than capable of helping yourself and keeping your earnings for projects you want to do.

  • @carinwiseman4309
    @carinwiseman4309 10 месяцев назад

    1,5 is long past.

  • @israeldiegoriveragenius2th164
    @israeldiegoriveragenius2th164 Год назад +13

    No to vaccine passports, no to mandates and no to lockdowns.

    • @888ssss
      @888ssss Год назад

      no to goverment. time to cull it back by 90%

    • @dmorris61
      @dmorris61 Год назад

      The Idiot speaks . . .

  • @thiccsmoke2354
    @thiccsmoke2354 Год назад +1

    This is the future, get used to it !!

  • @stealthbum34
    @stealthbum34 Год назад +5

    We won’t achieve it. Frankly, I’m glad we’re dying out.

    • @firstname4865
      @firstname4865 Год назад

      How come?

    • @therealkindle5365
      @therealkindle5365 Год назад

      @@firstname4865 Nihilism is the desperation to deny all care & healthy feedback to mass-suffering & death by those who have not yet learned the purpose of empathetic responses. I've heard this kind of reaction before - it is the cry of people who don't know what to do, do not feel comfortable admitting weakness, & are even too unable to confess they are afraid and have given up. So they they say "Good." And pretend like its what they wanted all along. Ignore these people. They are but the stone that cannot even roll down a hill!

    • @firstname4865
      @firstname4865 Год назад +1

      @@therealkindle5365 okay dude

  • @shuweb
    @shuweb Год назад

    No big deal, bring on the floods, land erosion, polluted food supply, and hot weather. The planet will be fine, it’ll make the world more interesting place to live in.

  • @andrewsmith3613
    @andrewsmith3613 Год назад

    We can install all the heat pumps we like in the UK, it won't make any difference if the Chinese keep decimating the environment or if Africa starts industrialising.

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад

      All one can do is try to make things less worse. Things could even be worse in China; at least closed loop manufacturing processes have started there and have become the norm. China, with all its faults, is at least using coal as a bridge-fuel to power its electric grid while they wait for the nuke biz to get its act together. They are doing more than Canada and the US is doing and already have some ultra high voltage transmission - DC and AC, which requires less fuel. They also emit half the amount of CO2 emissions per capita than the US does.

  • @WookiRahh
    @WookiRahh Год назад +9

    literally pointless talking about this while missiles are being lobbed about seems a pointless conversation

  • @sharongillesp
    @sharongillesp Год назад +3

    Don’t expect politicians are oligarchies to do anything that will improve the world.
    They’re stuck in a capitalist loop and can’t get out.
    Communities will need to start taking matters into their own hands.
    It’s going to be difficult because we’ve painted ourselves into a corner.
    If we choose rolling blackouts how will that effect the internet? We may have to make those hard choices.
    If we use more plastic bags to clean up the plastic on the beach … how does that help?

  • @user-pu5sk1zc8s
    @user-pu5sk1zc8s Год назад

    Show me one scientist living like the Amish.

    • @merlinious01
      @merlinious01 Год назад +1

      Living like the amish isnt necessary

  • @tr7b410
    @tr7b410 Год назад

    Welcome to the ANNIHILATION GENERATION.

  • @Kitty-lj7eg
    @Kitty-lj7eg Год назад

    How about countries like China and India the most pollution producers? Interesting to know how the UN do to get them reduce their pollution.

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад

      At least China with all its faults is doing more than North America, and and already have some ultra high voltage transmission - DC and AC, which requires less fuel. They also emit half the amount of CO2 emissions per capita than the US does. Plus they are using coal as a bridge-fuel to power its electric grid while they wait for the nuke biz to get its act together; they are in the midst of modernizing old ones while the nuclear industry is developing its new technology.
      BTW, most of the global greening is due to China’s and India’s mega tree planting programs, but it would take four times more land than exists on this planet with new trees on it keep up the current rate of CO2 emissions from fossil fuels, but most of that land would require irrigation with fresh water.

    • @Kitty-lj7eg
      @Kitty-lj7eg Год назад

      @@rps1689 Only if you believe in China's data...

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад

      @@Kitty-lj7eg Irrelevant. It's not secret they are modernizing the old ones. Plus have redesigned more grids than the US has. They love showing off their advanced synchronous grids to outsiders. The world's electrical grids are going to need replacing in the next few decades, from the top down. China is ahead in the game. Sixty Hertz AC is a technological legacy nearly as old as landline telephone subscriber loops. It limits the radius of a grid, and makes it vulnerable to the kind of cascade failure we saw in Texas and in the northeast US before that. Modern updated electric grids runs on high voltage DC and has no synchronization problem, so it can be continental or even global.
      You can see the greening they have done from satellites.

    • @Kitty-lj7eg
      @Kitty-lj7eg Год назад

      @@rps1689 How much do you get paid to post this essay. Actually, I don't want to know.

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад

      @@Kitty-lj7eg If only; but it's not an essay.
      Sorry, I dismiss the indolent.

  • @AClarke2007
    @AClarke2007 Год назад +6

    A new, GREEN WAR!

  • @Viewer-discretion-is-advised7
    @Viewer-discretion-is-advised7 Год назад

    It’s the rich and governments they need to convince they the ones increasing the temperature then they need to make
    It affordable for the rest us to switch over.

    • @sandradixon6205
      @sandradixon6205 Год назад

      If it’s left up to humans and their governments to reduce damaging emissions, it will never happen. The warnings have been given over and over for so many years but as always they fall on deaf ears. While the motive to make a lot of money overrides everything else, greedy people will continue to destroy our beautiful planet. However, our Creator has a purpose for us and the earth, so very shortly he is going to make drastic changes to the rulership of the earth. His heavenly Kingdom government is poised to remove and replace all existing human governments which have failed miserably to care for the needs of each one of their citizens. (Daniel 2:44) Each day the world reels from one disaster to another causing untold suffering. God’s Kingdom government will not only undo all the harm caused by incompetent and wicked people but it will bring true peace and security to all of earth’s inhabitants. All mankind will be completely united in peace, love, and harmony. Psalm 37:10, 11, 29 says: “Just a little while longer and the wicked will be no more; you will look at where they were, and they will not be there. But the meek will possess the earth, and they will find exquisite delight in the abundance of peace”.

    • @firstname4865
      @firstname4865 Год назад

      I've always found it funny how the eco warriors know that population levels is the real cause, and yet they all have or will have children.

    • @therealkindle5365
      @therealkindle5365 Год назад

      With the cost of WWII alone, we could have housed everybody on earth, wiped out the slums, given them food, clothing, healthcare, schools, etc. There is something deeply wrong with our culture. This is why we need to end Capitalism that makes humans do stupid things to survive. We have the resources, the know how, the technicians, the manpower. Humans need to just tell their psychopathic rulers to DO ONE.

  • @currentaf8455
    @currentaf8455 Год назад +3

    Instead of fighting wars.
    The west being the historical polluters should recognise the common but differentiated responsibility and lead. Instead they as global south with high populations and developing economies to radically change their lives without any technical transfers. This will lead to another for of colonialism

    • @sosig8332
      @sosig8332 Год назад

      Lol the west, you should look at the emissions from China.

    • @Luzitanium
      @Luzitanium Год назад +1

      the west arent the polluters you ignorant.

  • @marlonmendez5176
    @marlonmendez5176 Год назад +2

    "...Every country, ever sector, on ever timeframe... Everything, everywhere, all at once."
    If that's what it takes then we're already fucked. 😂👍gg

  • @paulmasonsjazz9611
    @paulmasonsjazz9611 Год назад +8

    As more people are being diagnosed with Climate Change Anxiety the law of unintended consequences is working again. Maybe to avoid a complete mental breakdown of the current and next generations, the media and government should start campaigns to reduce the amount of fear they have created.

    • @therealkindle5365
      @therealkindle5365 Год назад +1

      I doubt that the worst examples of humanity shan't be the ones who are the easiest to reason with. Hence why it is up to those closely associated with reality who are building the consensus for real change. Science determines that which accurately describes what is real from what is not.
      So it is preferable to study the Science for info, Technology for application, Engineering for Solutions, & Mathematics to put them to test in quantifiable scenarios. Thus S.T.E.M. 😉 Do you understand?

    • @OnlyGrafting
      @OnlyGrafting Год назад

      Sorry the first time I heard of climate change anxiety was when the democrats seriously thought that was most people's worry in the middle of the most unstable global economy and giant political divide due to rash and absurd government actions. Climate anxiety is fucking stupid, and only very few would suffer from it if it's not just anxiety attacks being rebranded like the fucking COVID deaths were.

    • @isolationnationn
      @isolationnationn Год назад +2

      Stopping the bus we're all on from going over the cliff is a much better solution than just making people less scared of the cliff.

    • @nathanmartin8393
      @nathanmartin8393 Год назад +2

      @@isolationnationn OR people could understand that there is no cliff at all.

    • @therealkindle5365
      @therealkindle5365 Год назад +1

      @@nathanmartin8393 Denial is a common defense of those who are unable to comprehend the methods of Science. It shan't avert anything, besides your contortion of reality.

  • @witsend236
    @witsend236 Год назад +13

    Yawn.

    • @dmorris61
      @dmorris61 Год назад

      Hopefully you won't wake up.

    • @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885
      @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 Год назад

      The Truth is a shopping experience. The customer is always right. Boredom is the worst problem in civilization - what existentialist Sarte called "Ennui." If everyone is so bored by the moon that they refuse to look at the moon then Poof! The moon will vanish! It's quite magically really. If only the MOon was a better shopping experience. More like a Valley Girl Mall in California. Gag me with a spoon! haha.

    • @sosig8332
      @sosig8332 Год назад

      Go back to sleep I know reality is tiring for you.

    • @django3422
      @django3422 Год назад

      ​@@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 Not the best example, as the moon exerts a measurable effect on us whether we choose to acknowledge it or not.

    • @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885
      @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 Год назад

      @@django3422 thanks - that was my joke reference to Einstein who made the same point that you're making in regards to quantum physics claiming a particle does not exist if it is not measured.

  • @albertwoodeasy9021
    @albertwoodeasy9021 Год назад +1

    we all move to live in hills and mountains.

  • @yesterday1396
    @yesterday1396 Год назад +5

    We're not going to make it lol

    • @firstname4865
      @firstname4865 Год назад +1

      Media and government worked together to make us think the same about covid

  • @peteredwards338
    @peteredwards338 Год назад

    Are these the same "experts " who 50 years ago warned of the coming ice age ?

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад +2

      No one in main stream climate science predicted the imminent glacial period Leonard Nimoy described and the tabloids of the 70s. There were two papers, by Schneider, Kukla, and Rasool, that made headlines when the reporters misread them. They predicted the slow cooling of 1940-1980, which was caused by global dimming might continue. Their papers said that If that trend had continued, the ice sheets would be back, in 20 to 40 thousand years. But the reporters missed that part. The tabloids ran an imminent ice age scare and the newspapers picked it up from them.

    • @nsbd90now
      @nsbd90now Год назад

      No, because that never happened. It's a dumb Republican propaganda script for thoughtless rubes to mindlessly parrot over and over and over again.;

  • @freshprince3891
    @freshprince3891 Год назад +3

    Only people who will fall for this are theses people 😷

  • @retro1980x
    @retro1980x Год назад +1

    Burning coal to make electricity 😆😆😆

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад

      At least it is only meant to be a stop gap.

  • @petepete66
    @petepete66 Год назад +2

    Point of no return is over stepped … no chance to save the earth 🔥🔥🔥🌎🔥🔥🔥 they only say this so that the humans do not get in panic 🔥🔥🔥☀️🔥🔥🔥💀👍

    • @Inspirator_AG112
      @Inspirator_AG112 Год назад +1

      Except they are scientists. You are a denialist of the opposite type you are condemning.

    • @user-mn9sv8fr6y
      @user-mn9sv8fr6y Год назад +2

      Yep. Better be prepping.

    • @Inspirator_AG112
      @Inspirator_AG112 Год назад +1

      Do you even realize that the second sentence is just a conspiracy theory now?

    • @petepete66
      @petepete66 Год назад +1

      @@Inspirator_AG112 … very extremer climate shows are out there now getting faster extremer 🔥… storm is on the Horizont … some of us can smell if the bad weather is coming in future… … in history in the past there where many older civilizations finished from nature disasters … because they didn’t hear to her heart … they only took too much from Mother Earth … and only the god of money and gold dictated their life … but change is on his way … be prepared always for everything everytime … we have to get back to a simpler life … more respect to nature and wild animals… stay little … forget money and technology in this way we practice today … we have to change us now … maybe it’s too late … 🔥🔥🔥✌️🌎✌️🔥🔥🔥🍀

    • @user-mn9sv8fr6y
      @user-mn9sv8fr6y Год назад +1

      @@Inspirator_AG112 It's a true conspiracy theory. Better than saying oil companies are our saviors and they are not responsible for climate change, but that space lasers, Harp, and antifa are responsible.

  • @philsophkenny
    @philsophkenny Год назад

    😮

  • @davidmead6337
    @davidmead6337 Год назад +1

    Although we need energy to survive we do not need to Grow our footprint any longer. It is the Economic System that we bow down to which is the underlying problem. The past of rapacious extraction of energy, including the extractive human energy , must change for the future health of the planet. And we must do this change of our economic assumptions on a global scale. We are no longer self sufficient when it comes to the economic sphere. This is an international problem, both of cause and effect. WE MUST change how we practice the game of Economy for any chance to mitigate what we have done to our mother earth. Those who would like to deny the facts will always be around the margins of the truth. Wishful thinking is also a human trait which creates a process of giving up. Time for us to reorganise our economy and grow up to reality.

  • @rudiehull1446
    @rudiehull1446 Год назад

    If life were fair , we'd all b sitting undr a tree with a bowel of rice! Unfortunatley. Nice to think that we may1 day undrstand that its in most of our's nature jus 2b FrikkN Caring to try to respect and learn from each othr and our nature's to mature 2b bettering ourselves to learn to love what has given us life

    • @therealkindle5365
      @therealkindle5365 Год назад

      That is merely a projection of your values as a result of an emotion reaction due to a lack of information to solve problems of practical application. You need to educate yourself in semantics & also behavioral science to restrict these outbursts. Then you will be able to think more clearly.

  • @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885
    @voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 Год назад

    I hope James Hong watched his statement!

  • @jonathaneffemey944
    @jonathaneffemey944 Год назад +4

    Thanks so much for posting.

  • @sidali2590
    @sidali2590 Год назад

    We're talking too much about climate change but not taking action

  • @Notoths
    @Notoths Год назад

    Yes. It will take scotland to go elecric. Hahaha

  • @areeyedee
    @areeyedee Год назад +5

    I took the time to call for a real revolution and wrote a song about negligence when it comes to climate change. So many people protest but still buy the newest cell phones, clothes and splurge. It is time for them to really make a stand, start a real revolution and fight for those making cents an hour just to feed their families.

    • @sandradixon6205
      @sandradixon6205 Год назад

      If it’s left up to humans and their governments to reduce damaging emissions, it will never happen. The warnings have been given over and over for so many years but as always they fall on deaf ears. While the motive to make a lot of money overrides everything else, greedy people will continue to destroy our beautiful planet. However, our Creator has a purpose for us and the earth, so very shortly he is going to make drastic changes to the rulership of the earth. His heavenly Kingdom government is poised to remove and replace all existing human governments which have failed miserably to care for the needs of each one of their citizens. (Daniel 2:44) Each day the world reels from one disaster to another causing untold suffering. God’s Kingdom government will not only undo all the harm caused by incompetent and wicked people but it will bring true peace and security to all of earth’s inhabitants. All mankind will be completely united in peace, love, and harmony. Psalm 37:10, 11, 29 says: “Just a little while longer and the wicked will be no more; you will look at where they were, and they will not be there. But the meek will possess the earth, and they will find exquisite delight in the abundance of peace”.

    • @OnlyGrafting
      @OnlyGrafting Год назад

      Not happening. The banks are the real threat to Society. They're playing with everyone's money to the point where it's quite literally many times over the amount they have and they're still lending. It will collapse one day and there will be no payouts to anyone but the elite in charge. And that day will plunge every nation further down the poverty line.

    • @rudiehull1446
      @rudiehull1446 Год назад

      MaD WorlD

    • @bubbajones6907
      @bubbajones6907 Год назад

      Maybe you could have a productive life if you just cut out the soy.

    • @RokeJulianLockhart.s13ouq
      @RokeJulianLockhart.s13ouq Год назад +1

      Those things won't make a positive noticeable difference, and will never convince anyone. Stifling innovation, whatever the rationale, never works. We need to instead force our governments and companies to adopt and mandate better solutions.

  • @marinaclarasanchezsuarez2905
    @marinaclarasanchezsuarez2905 9 месяцев назад

    We Want Zero Point Energy NOW⭐⭐⭐⭐

  • @alexander211974
    @alexander211974 Год назад +2

    No such thing a an absolute scientific fact.science deals in probability.

    • @user-mn9sv8fr6y
      @user-mn9sv8fr6y Год назад +1

      Not true. Science deals with facts that can be proven, not probability. Probability is in the realm of hypotheses. Global warming is not a hypothesis.

  • @33wanwan
    @33wanwan Год назад

    zero economy

  • @Christinebanks11
    @Christinebanks11 Год назад +2

    Without greenhouse gas in our atmosphere, our planet will go through an 8ce afe that will turn our planet into a wasteland of near extinction . IS THAT WHAT YOU WANT ?

    • @englishsteve1465
      @englishsteve1465 Год назад

      Yeah ! I'll bet all those highly educated internationally respected science bods hadn't thought of that !
      FFS George, 'av a word wiv yerself fella.

  • @3dcarbonuk243
    @3dcarbonuk243 Год назад +3

    PROPAGANDA

  • @jaydee3965
    @jaydee3965 Год назад +6

    Round up the pollenator's, regulate everything into a GMO, with one seed die-off genetics to secure seed sales bi-yearly, and yeah, you can make it seem so. There's a fake crisis for sure. Saying billions of people live on our planet and animals are being crowded out is a convenient phrase, but truth is we have enough land area in Texas alone to hold half the world's people comfortably. We own those land areas within the maps, but there are ecosystems completely uneffected in those regions. You use the technical boundaries of the maps to sound sinister to stupid audiences, or so you believe.
    Volcanoes are in charge of climate change, no one denies it happens, we deny it happens like Al Gore says it does and the actual driving mechanics, consensus, is pushing like its fact and not communist propaganda to drive reset aspirations.
    This communist eco-scarecrow is just a control tactic to gain authority to own the resources. They'll revert to what China does right now globally in a decade, if given reigns to control us globally.
    We regulate in the Deep South, the radicals in California destroy and set fires to push the we're doomed and destructive agenda for Marxism. While getting fire relief money and insurance payments. The Marxist hubs of Washington and Oregon join in every year to push the climate crisis agenda, but Alabama is green and flourishing with its neighbors in the old regulatory conservation methods that work perpetually, indefinitely.
    Its all joined at the hip, and it's all lies.
    A huge spot appeared in the early spectrometry scans of Earth over North America. In that infant age of science, they labeled it greenhouse pollution on sight to panic us then. Following your main idiot's literature here on this cast.
    It was determined after analysis to be pure oxygen. Our crops every year renew the atmosphere even more than the rainforests. We are the biggest global producer of oxygen and alarmist insanity isn't new or a passing fad.
    Climate freaks, will giddily point to California getting an amount of snow it hasn't seen in a hundred years like its human impact today causing it. Missing the obvious oxymoron of, "as much snow as it had a hundred years ago". Climate models are engineered to be in disaster based on no corrective processes within Earth's ecosphere.
    In truth there are cycle's of change in climactic conditions that have little to do with mankind. As the 1995 hole in the ozone scare was found to have self-repaired by 2015.
    The super volcanoes spew out tons of aerosol particulates. The things they say our deodorant puts in the atmosphere. Our output is like 2% verses 86% volcano per year or decade. We aren't driving or impacting anything significantly, so the only reason to bring it up is to panic free society into willful capitulation for manager oversight.
    i.e. Communism, as much as it cliams to be against management, we saw in Cuba and other psedo-capitalistic nations like China, this is a complete and utter lie. Every aspect of life is controlled and monitored with regulatory limiters.
    Nothing in nature is broken. The processes are just in transition and the cycle goes on. Animals dying out aren't a moral crisis, people's populations being labled the cause is the only unethical immoral undertaking, when the elite who want control are to blame.
    Sea levels rise and fall but coastal inundation most often is caused by sand dredging for gold, and other resources and for the cement industry. They suck out tons of sand per day off of coastal shelf's and then the coastline begins to sink as it falls into the lows created in that action. Mostly around islands who have been raped by industry due to rights violations by developing nations in their regions. Wind blown sand is not suitable for cement so only sea sand is rough enough to do the bonding process, and any thinking person can see that it takes millions of tons just to make one stadium, let alone a city. So there is a human impact, but it's corporate and they want you to turn over everything to them so they can manage it. No thanks.
    You're all naive at best, complacent at an incompetent level if innocent, or are active in the conspiracy to missdirect, cover up data and lie. Because you're a corporate paid mouth, or a communist supporter.
    Take climate and extinction and shove it up your corporate bums, and blame your horrible wildlife management practices in fanatic area's and your industrial oversight for any issues you blame on the public at large.
    We aren't to blame, you idiot's are!

    • @annettemack4825
      @annettemack4825 Год назад

      I'm glad Texas has so much room. Why then does it not accept climate refugees at it's borders? Keep your eyes on the Arctic. If it melts, then the problems begin.

    • @jaydee3965
      @jaydee3965 Год назад

      @@annettemack4825 They are fleeing weather that will always be worse or better from region to region, which will always change over time, just like the artic and the changes California experienced this winter. Its just another slogan to excuse illegality. Occum's Razor. If you're actually worried about population sprawl, the point of mentioning the land area was we are dispersed relatively far apart in the rural areas. Its urban blight that ruins the world. There I agree. Yet our day to day carbon emissions being a major factor in climates is a misnomer of the highest order. Litter, and runoff from big population centers is a fact. They don't congregate in urban sprawl out of a love of surrounding nature, its economic. More trades, more oppertunity for a job, nothing natural focused at all. New York logic is insane logic.

    • @freedomruss
      @freedomruss 10 месяцев назад

      WE HAVE A BINGO! 🎉

  • @cayminlast
    @cayminlast Год назад +1

    First, we would like some explaination for the many hundreds of "Peer Reviewed Research Papers,/Studies" that had to be 'retracted' when it was discovered that the 'Peers' had been less than ethical, faked their credentials and conspired to publish worthless data in order to fit their narative.

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад +1

      Do list which specific peer reviewed papers and competitive high-impact science journals, by top leading working scientists were unethical, and faked their credentials.
      The great thing about peer review, is it exposes bought scientists being called out by honest competitors, which there is no lack of. Buying a scientist only gets the buyer errors and biases, which do not get published in peer reviews. And on the rare occasion that BS gets published, rivals and competitors pounce.
      Though peer review isn't perfect, it is independent of the government and other funding sources and is the best way to make sure that fraudulent, fabricated, or otherwise unsubstantiated "findings" and interpretations don't find their way into high-impact science journals.

  • @samshep70
    @samshep70 Год назад +1

    Game over..

  • @pattimichellesheaffer103
    @pattimichellesheaffer103 Год назад +1

    Primarily a greenwashing propaganda film... but so far, nothing else has worked to get people to decrease their carbon footprints, either.

    • @mayrokratt6195
      @mayrokratt6195 11 месяцев назад

      i waer biodegradable rubber :) and I don't leave footprints around since I don't step on water

  • @mra4107
    @mra4107 Год назад +1

    Our climate situation is unquestionably dire, and there's no way we're going to change quickly enough to solve this problem. What about hyperconsumerism? Endless growth economic models? Global shipping/trade? Sunk costs in vehicle-dependent suburban living arrangements? Heavy machinery? Mining operations? Overpopulation? Industrial agriculture? Developing countries unable to afford new technologies? And no one talks about the self-reinforcing feedback loops that will take over and lead to an irreversible predicament. Enjoy the few decades we left, folks.

    • @sandradixon6205
      @sandradixon6205 Год назад

      If it’s left up to humans and their governments to reduce damaging emissions, it will never happen. The warnings have been given over and over for so many years but as always they fall on deaf ears. While the motive to make a lot of money overrides everything else, greedy people will continue to destroy our beautiful planet. However, our Creator has a purpose for us and the earth, so very shortly he is going to make drastic changes to the rulership of the earth. His heavenly Kingdom government is poised to remove and replace all existing human governments which have failed miserably to care for the needs of each one of their citizens. (Daniel 2:44) Each day the world reels from one disaster to another causing untold suffering. God’s Kingdom government will not only undo all the harm caused by incompetent and wicked people but it will bring true peace and security to all of earth’s inhabitants. All mankind will be completely united in peace, love, and harmony. Psalm 37:10, 11, 29 says: “Just a little while longer and the wicked will be no more; you will look at where they were, and they will not be there. But the meek will possess the earth, and they will find exquisite delight in the abundance of peace”.

    • @firstname4865
      @firstname4865 Год назад

      Bet the people shouting climate change still have children.

    • @hosnimubarak8869
      @hosnimubarak8869 Год назад

      @@firstname4865
      ???

    • @firstname4865
      @firstname4865 Год назад

      @@hosnimubarak8869 population levels are the number one cause of climate change, if an individual truly believes in it, they wouldn't have kids.

    • @therealkindle5365
      @therealkindle5365 Год назад

      All of these problems can be overcome in relatively little time by addressing the root cause of them, & transitioning to a Resource-Based Economy. When humanity has access to education & resources without a price tag, there shall be no limit to the human potential. But we must study the methods of this advanced system & push for it. If we do nothing, I assure you.. nothing shall happen.

  • @paulhiggins6175
    @paulhiggins6175 Год назад

    If mankind is at risk of damage and all God creations, then everything that is required to stop the claimant change must be given for free to save mankind.
    But if it’s not given for free to protect this world and all that God created then it must be for profit only and to push their agenda and products for profit.
    So give it for free to save the world yes or no

  • @kenevil23
    @kenevil23 Год назад +1

    Fossil fuels, fossil fuels, fossils fuels, sea level rises! Not one single mention of the other half of the problem i.e animal agriculture and commercial fishing or the most imminent and serious impact of crop failures, food shortages and mass species extinction.
    The same story, that everyone with two brain cells to rub together now accepts, minus the impact of ecological collapse, famine and mass migration on a scale that will make the "small boats crisis" seem like pedalos on a boating lake.

    • @firstname4865
      @firstname4865 Год назад

      Or talking about how 90% of climate damage is caused by the middle class and rich

    • @paleocon777
      @paleocon777 Год назад

      North America is full of oil underneath.
      The associated press said in 1989...
      "A senior UN environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels if global warming is not reversed by the year 2000"
      The only thing we have in the ozone is from water, 97% vapor.

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад

      @@paleocon777 Your cherry picking and scientific illiteracy is astounding.

  • @retro1980x
    @retro1980x Год назад +1

    More lies 🤣🤣🤣

  • @Northern_Rockhopper
    @Northern_Rockhopper Год назад

    Reverse climate change… yet Ant and Dec fly around the world along with their Z list celeb friends to Florida, Australia, and now South Africa to make television shows. Don’t make me laugh!

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 Год назад

      I get it, private jets are important for raising resentment among the regressive rubes.

  • @Yelluz
    @Yelluz Год назад +1

    There is no climate crisis.

    • @nsbd90now
      @nsbd90now Год назад +1

      You have to clap your hands while you say that to make it come true.

  • @jjjkenny
    @jjjkenny Год назад +14

    This is BS

    • @888ssss
      @888ssss Год назад +2

      thats what the owners of channel 4 pay it to produce. lies.

    • @dmorris61
      @dmorris61 Год назад

      No, it's science asshole.

    • @ianhamilton3113
      @ianhamilton3113 Год назад

      @@888ssss Any evidence you two? No? Do you both realise that talking out of your backsides will turn you into silly old farts? Science fact!

  • @brianmcg321
    @brianmcg321 Год назад +1

    These are all lies

    • @Inspirator_AG112
      @Inspirator_AG112 Год назад +1

      Whether you are a climate change doomer or denialist, you are still denying science.

  • @888ssss
    @888ssss Год назад +4

    they are simply trying to extort your children.

  • @p165711
    @p165711 Год назад +8

    Blah blah blah.....