regarding flooding, UK needs to give room for rivers to naturally flood on their floodplain like they do in the Netherlands, by restricting development. A wide scale reintroduction of beavers in suitable areas will also help slow down large amounts of water and is a cheaper solution than traditional flood defenses
They have where I live in the uk. My hometown used to flood terribly but now we have 2 extremely large areas that are now lakes which has resolved the issue.
“ let’s face it, we all use a dishwasher” wow……..he’s pretty out of touch with many people in the U.K. Thank you MP Matthew Pennycock for noticing that!
Of the UK government wants to see what happens when you build too many houses especially on flood plains they should look at what happened to Houston Texas a couple years ago when a hurricane hit and the water had nowhere to go.
Thanks for your good advice, note they don't listen to good advice unless it makes them money. The UK government is busy with its head up its arse counting the backhanders
Easy. Clear the drains properly, update them from Victorian quality, dredge the rivers, streams and canals as they should be, stop building houses on the flood planes and take council workers off Furlough and we will be fine as we have been every other year
Too many houses were built on flood-risk areas. There seems to be a love affair in the UK with low-density housing in the countryside, but this needs to change. The government should make it easier for developers to construct high-density housing (apartment buildings) in urban centres which are not at risk of flooding and which are close to amenities.
Most modern cities are built on coastal arras or on/near large rivers... For trade, and transport and food. Really we should be building on higher ground away from the water.
Unfortunately the high-rise buildings are too often made with concrete, a material that begins with high levels of pollution, water, and sand that close to complete loss. Add in dark facades, often made of various plastics (Grenfell) and heated by using natural gas. There ARE far better alternatives to all these materials. Developers want fast, cheap and very profitable buildings sold at higher prices. Basically those buildings are the human version of chicken coops.
We have 95% CO2 emissions from these 3 sectors: 1) heating in winter (coal, oil, gas, some wood) 30% CO2 emissions 2) transportation (almost all on oil) about 28% CO2 emissions 3) electricity usage (55% of EL is produced with, you guess, coal, oil and gas, some wood) 25% CO2 emissions We also have animal agriculture about 14% CO2 emissions
@@kevinb6831 no harm in trying. Especially as it was us that started the industrial revolution. It all started here steam engines, bicycles, soft porn lol. Considering how tiny our country is. It has made quite an impact on the world, for good and bad.
@@kevinb6831 everyone needs to do their part. We can't criticize the developing world while at the same thing enjoying the perks of emissions. The benefits of going green are beyond climate change. It will benefit our physical and mental health.
I think we need to distinguish clearly between climate change and pollution. The former cannot be "controlled" whereas the latter can be. Practically speaking, there is no way we can prevent floods, hurricanes, tsunamis and tornadoes from happening. But there is a lot we can do to reduce pollution. The sad fact is that, no matter how much activists protest and talk, there is always more plastic in the supermarket, always more paper in our mailboxes (loads of unsolicited ads), always more and more people buying new cars with all the latest features, more and more planes criss-crossing the skies.Always more and more people buying the latest smartphones, tablets and computers. And few think about where all the old phones, Ipads and computers end up. They are NOT biodegradable. We have an unsatiable appetite for unlimited travel - and all the latest that technology has to offer -- and we want it 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Unless we - as a global community - are willing to make some serious changes to our lifestyles, I fear that any talk about climate change is ..... not terribly meaningful.
ive come to the conclusion that western culture is about the most ldiotic one there ever was but unfortunately ended up being the dominant one. native indians would never have let it come to this. aboriginals the same.
Agreed, and yet people are pointing fingers at anyone and everyone else instead of saving up for "plug and play" wind mini turbines to reduce dependency on large power generation done by fossil fuels. Change out one window at a time to triple glazed. Walk to the local stores and markets. Maybe get a bicycle for visiting family and friends. Pull up all those lawns, plant food bushes, flowers for pollinators, trees for nuts, fruits, and put in perennial plants that provide food all year. Don't buy clothes for "fashion, latest colours, etc but do buy clothes with natural fibre content.
Building embakments along rivers ,flood plains along river beds, raising the floor levels of houses. People need to adapt to the change in weather. conditions.
Its already happening been happening in are area etc. For the last 6months look up in the sky.. And the amount of white lines coming frm certain aircraft are spawning out contrails, cremtails. Is changing the weather also..
Have to say, here in Scotland I remember cold white winters, we'd have weeks off school, this was only just a decade ago. Now we get no snow, the past 4 summers we've had basically no rain and soaring temperatures
Where do you live? Because where I am, it’s been thunderstorms and torrential rain, with a few warm days here and there. This winter was mild, but the last few have been knee deep snow and constant minus figures.
@@drey8 I live in Scotland……..It has not been no rain, no snow and soaring temperatures the past 4 summers. It’s been pissing down with rain all week, like it does for most of the year and we’ve had maybe a combined 7 to 10 days of hot weather every summer, along with the weather being average for the country.
It’s time to get corporations and bankers to pay for the damage they have done to humanity, better if government handles it otherwise people will rip them apart!!! We all had enough Tod this sons of Satan.
@Q Schurz well you won't have to die on that hill because everyday we get closer to our goal of stopping climate change and your taxes have been steadily rising for years now due to that. We have kinda already succeeded in a way though we have a bit to go to save our planet still but you will pay for it with your taxes
Only difference is this time it’s changing way faster than any natural change of the earths climate could. But you clearly know more than the people who spend their entire lives studying the climate and the seriousness of the drastic change that’s happening right now smh 🤦♂️……...
@@fakenewssucks211 Because you do not understand that minimum point of climate measurement is 1 year average temp. See how is that going for your country. Type in google: average year temp. history for (Germany) graph (your country). Who told you that is getting colder?
We need to do all we can to prevent flooding but it is not good to keep building on our green belt. That should stop. Poorer people need help if gas boilers have to be replaced. Not everyone is in a cosy secure well paid job.
It don’t work look at the 50’s-60’s high rise blocks!! Vile disgraceful buildings cold damp unsafe and often crime and drug ridden. Why shouldn’t people have a house and a garden!
@@zeffy._440 fear mongering to put up taxes and return us to serfdom which is all part of limits to growth written by the elites. elites own bother energy and oil companies as "renewables" creates new markets and more profits but higher energy bills to fund subsidies and carbon taxes, look it up.
If we, the people, dont act ie: start growing and producing our own food and resources at home and amoungst our own streets and communities outside of the governments "authority" and completely naturally ie not using fossil fuels or electric, then this society is fu£@ed. To put it in simple terms 🤣🙏
That’s not feasible on a large scale. We can’t keep putting the responsibility on the individual consumer. We need large systemic change, increased international solidarity, and a reform in the way we do business.
Does anyone else notice the vastly different approaches our media apply to interviewing a Tory versus Labour MP Please don’t try to tell me there’s any neutrality left in journalism
You can do little about Climate change, as it is a natural phenomenon . Yes mankind may be adding to it, but we know that the climate has always changed, even massively in the past as scientists have told us, so why do we think it would stop now for our convenience?
Affordable? Yea, losing your house in a flash flood or in a forest fire is affordable? Or having food and water in your table is affordable to lose? And all the environment with all the species is affordable to lose too? Talking about economy without having ecological losses within is just nuts, but hey we have been there centuries already... All economies have made a total miss calculation and left all natural damages out. We take what we want from nature - with zero economical costs and we use that stuff days and then we toss wastes back in the nature (most times in a format that nature can't handle)...
World: Global warming is causing floods in Germany, China, Britain, New Zealand and America. US: "The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive." D.Trump Native: "Your kids can name more KPop groups than they can types of native trees." Sean Sherman China: "Ecology is a resource, wealth and treasure." Xi Jinping.
We have had a couple of atmospheric rivers in the past while. Now, people look at this and cannot conceive of the situation elsewhere on the planet. The rate of desertification that is taking place right now is mind numbing. People having to make a mass exodus from their landsis staggering. Our weather is being manipulated and they use "climate change" as an excuse to justify these unexplainable weather anomalies.
Taking a historical view of change, have humans been better adapters or controllers? How fruitless it will be if we see ourselves as able to control the weather by changing our boilers.
We are very good at controlling our influence... Ask Gorillas, Mink and Humpback whales... ask Murry Cod... You seem to imply that Climate Change is inevitable and nothing to do with Humans... Both proven wrong.
Why do people complain hot summer and then run to Spain, Greece or Thailand for hot summer beach holidays? Just have fun at home. Make Coke and Pepsi to stop digging out water. They should use surface water or desalination water to sell their beverages.
China contributes more than the three highest contributing countries combined. So I feel like no significant changes can occur without if China is not going to change as well.
China IS changing, just at a slower pace cos still a developing country. The worlds number one producer of solar pv^ This illogical excuse not to take action wouldnt work in any other setting You wouldnt allow someone else's laziness/poverty/morals to dictate ur actions
Keep work from home wherever possible, rather than irresponsibily lecturing people to "get back to the office". There will be an economic impact, but we're supposed to be in a "climate emergency" right? The doublethink practiced by this government is laughable.
You may believe from this report that Allegra Stratton is a scientist or someone who is actually qualified to talk about this complex subject. Actually she is a former journalist who studied archeology and anthropology. She is BJ’s former press secretary. More Tory hype and Boris bullshit.
@@Chrishagen you believe the party system, huh? Neither represent the people. Science is becoming a religion or a wing of the government like Soviet Scientists or sponsored by big business, so its a false choice of corperatism or communism as neither represent the people.
The futility and arrogance. To think that humans who have been on the planet for a relative blink of an eye could have an influence and affect on an ecology that is billions and billions of years old. Laughable.
How can you possibly ignore the impact we've had on ecology in the past 200 years? Arrogance indeed. Human-based climate change started in the 1830s. We're not discussing natural climate change here and you know this. We made this happen, we can reverse it, but we're almost out of time. Refusing to take responsibility surely won't help.
@Peter Hicks At last someone understands. Using that weather modification machine, it is easy to disguise it behind the weather. I mean who's going to question the weather? Even though they were using it in the Vietnam war which can be searched online, people to lazy to do research on that machine.
@Peter Hicks you right wingers i know will never ever admit you were wrong and the left were right. you will just make up more conspiracy nonsense. you'll be making up conspiracies to your last drop of drinkable water. which probably wont be too long from now
@Peter Hicks, I only got this notification today, unbelievable. Also, I noticed BBC deleted some replies. I totally agree with you, & with that energy field they can just deliver it at will.
Change our FPTP undemocratic voting system which is exactly why we only have 1 Green MP. In a guaranteed “safe” Tory seat…..my vote has bee totally pointless for 30 years.
Econ student here and I agree. Pricing negative externalities heavily that arise from pollution alongside a strict and large carbon emission tax is a good idea though setting up the guidelines won't be very easy to do still we have to find a way to do so though but thanks to current capitalism that's not happening due to lobbying which is a staple of our current economic system
You can't tackle "nature", the often forgotten aspect whenever "climate change" is discussed. The sun rises and sets each day, this is called the "day cycle" ... a period of light and warmth followed by dark and cold. The sun also proceeds north then south, the "seasonal cycle" bringing warmth then cold. The sun goes through a "solar cycle" in which it outputs a higher frequency of energy "solar maximum" before descending to a lower output "solar minimum" ... which operates on a period of about 11 years. These are observable cycles, you can observe longer cycles outside of this i.e. in the 1750s the period between the solar maximum & solar minimum where much longer, since the mid-1800s the period has decreased. The fact these cycles are ignored, "climate scientists" often parroted by the media point only at the chemical composition of the atmosphere > the claim that only man could effect that. Also, given "world leaders" only seem to care about "climate change" when trying to enforce some thing upon the people they "govern", their motives should be questioned i.e. "world leaders" so concerned about "climate change" yet travel on their own private aircrafts, splurging money on supporting technology [wind, solar, battery] that require significant resources to be extracted from the earth or the tearing down of trees & greenland [which ironically are the solution to "excess" CO2] to make way for "high-speed" trains which the average person will likely never use. The climate on earth has always changed, regardless of man, it will continue to change again regardless of what man does ...
It's a global issue. Domestic reforms are part of a global solution. Giving up just means your grandkids will definitely be shiving each other for the last mouthful of potable water.
Was watching a program about the coldest place on earth minus 72. And they have been finding a lot more of mamoths than ever before. There are things in the ice that have been preserved. Things that we might not want
1,5C is just not possible. Not even with IPCC's own report. Best IPCC scenario was 1,4C and that included many flaws. Starting line was 2015 and after that we have already emitted 5,5 years more carbon with 8.5 pathway adding around 0,1C to IPCC's model the temperature (ie. here said 1,2C which is 0,1C higher than IPCC's used 1,1C). Aerosols are pretty messed up in lower scenarios. IPCC says 0,4C aerosol cooling currently and when we pahse out fossil burning that means 0,4C warming leading to 1,5C alone. Then IPCC added 300-500GtCO2e to the mix, so all their emission pathways stays on positive signs... And they even say "Additional ecosystem responses to warming not yet fully included in climate models, such as CO2 and CH4 fluxes from wetlands, permafrost thaw and wildfires, would further increase concentrations of these gases in the atmosphere (high confidence). {5.4, Box TS.5, TS.3.2}". Most non-linear responses are not there and we have already gone over Amazon rainforest tipping point where the forest can no longer inhale carbon, but instead emits it (2 studies in 2021). IPCC has even chosen industrial era 1850-1900 to their preindustrial starting point (because it has better data, but still). And then there's around 1600GtCO2e of uncertainties which could mean max. around 0,5C warming (or unlikely cooling). So IPCC has made political reasoning and made the data look like we have a chance for 1,5C. But if you read what I said, that's only a politically needed lie. When adding a low tipping element forcings you'll soon end up to a world over 3,0C warming by 2100 and likely 2,0C by 2050. And that's where I think we are going even if we try to avoid further heating.
Or just chill, stop listening to the propaganda and let nature do its thing. The arrogance of man to think we can affect the earth's climate is staggering.
I think we can use ram pumps to solve the energy crisis. First we build a hollow cylindrical tower out at sea, to a depth of say 1100m. The tower is open to the air at the top and has a sealed base at the bottom. We drill a hole about 20m below the surface and feed water into the tower. The water falls down a pipe for about 200m where it powers a turbine that is connected to an electricity generator. We collect the water and drop it down a pipe for another 200m to another turbine. We do this twice more until we are getting electricity from four generators. We then drop the water another 200m to power a turbine which drives a cog that is geared to turn a disc at the base of the tower. The waste water from the last turbine starts to collect at the bottom of the tower creating a shallow reservoir that we need to pump out. The rotating disc at the base of the tower has cams along its edge. These cams are used to push pistons outwards. These pistons are in cylinders built into the wall in a circular formation. The cylinders are sealed at the interior side apart from where a piston rod enters to push the piston outward. The outside of the piston head is exposed to the deep sea water. The cam will push the piston outward against the high pressure deep sea water. An inlet pipe will take water from our shallow reservoir which will be pulled into the space created in the cylinder, behind the piston head. When the cam releases the piston, the low pressure water inside the cylinder will be the only thing pushing the piston out against the high pressure deep sea water. This is when the system acts as a ram pump. The piston will be forced inward and will force the low pressure water back out through the inlet pipe toward the reservoir. The inlet pipe will now act the same as a waste pipe in a ram pump and the flowing water will shut a waste valve. The remaining water in the cylinder will be forced through a check valve into a pipe and upwards to the surface. The larger the diameter of the tower, the more cylinders that can be built into the wall at the base of the tower. I realise that the ram pump cylinder will pump more of its water back into the reservoir than it sends to the surface but we can always add more cylinders to the system. We can even put another layer of cylinders above the original ones as ram pumps still work underneath shallow water. I think we should be able to pump water upwards at the same rate that it falls into the bottom of the tower and so keep the reservoir nice and shallow. Now, if I understand the maths correctly, we might only be able to pump the water near to the surface. In that case, we can pump the water into a reservoir tank (inside the tower) and use the electricity generated by the first turbine to pump out the tank. This will leave us with 3 generators worth of electricity for every tower built. Would this work? Everyone, please comment.
@@BuddhaOfDarkness also is the irony that a person with a youtube account called 'leecifer Voorhees' with a picture of a super 'scary' skull would call someone a 'kiduld' and a ' freakish narcissist'? Is the world suddenly devoid of irony? self awareness? Really? How is it you are impervious to your own judgment of yourself? How?!
I need a lawyer, the case is open I cant say the name of the Multinational. I'm in London and afraid, false publicity on the environment and the evidence is devastating. I thanks the Parliament to have stop them but when it came of blowing the whistle no help for the case.
All westerners could just stop consuming (except food and drinks) for a year. We already have enough. And all that stuff has made its impact to the nature already and continuing consumerism just makes things worse.
@@flashfm7456 car usage is likely bigger than rinsing dishes yeah but not animal agriculture. Animals agriculture contributes to more climate change causes than the entire of transport combined
Please elaborate! Is out of the box wind and solarenergy? If so we are fkd.. If out of the box nuclear energy generation 4, we will burn the uranium with just 500 years in storage until its non lethal.. contra 100.000 years storage we got thousands of tons stored in bedrock. We all got a responsibility for our past generations mistakes. Screaming for wind and solar power is like being an ostrich sticking head in the sand.
Look at the background! Hard surfaces everywhere. What is the best change to make? Far less concrete and asphalt, more permeable surfaces, along with far more green infrastructure, green spaces that have trees, undergrowth and zero lawns. Rainwater collection in each home, far less fossil fuel heating, and far fewer vehicles. Nope, not going to happen because money. Seriously? How much more money are people going to spend next year, the years after?
Where is that, because there isn't a single country that is experiencing cooling. But maybe you're so dense that you think temps taken with a thermometer on your back porch for a few weeks is the same as global temps for 200 years. Admit it... you've been duped by right-wing media.
regarding flooding, UK needs to give room for rivers to naturally flood on their floodplain like they do in the Netherlands, by restricting development. A wide scale reintroduction of beavers in suitable areas will also help slow down large amounts of water and is a cheaper solution than traditional flood defenses
They have where I live in the uk. My hometown used to flood terribly but now we have 2 extremely large areas that are now lakes which has resolved the issue.
@@Sarah-ft8jr Invite Coke and Pepsi to setup plants there using surface waters instead of using ground water.
We could find ways to build floating, flood resistant homes on flood plains.
Use Boris and Priti as sandbags.Job done.
Well said...and why not!
😂
Boris and priti aren't intelligent enough to be sand bags.
Priti will try to deport anyone who makes her become a sandbag.
You can't use wind bags as sand bags
“ let’s face it, we all use a dishwasher” wow……..he’s pretty out of touch with many people in the U.K. Thank you MP Matthew Pennycock for noticing that!
You could start by switching off the 4 giant unnecessary TV screens behind you. Imagine how much energy the BBC waste on a daily basis.
Get off your computer, you're wasting energy. In fact, live in the woods and eat mushrooms. In fact, don't do anything.
Eh?
Of the UK government wants to see what happens when you build too many houses especially on flood plains they should look at what happened to Houston Texas a couple years ago when a hurricane hit and the water had nowhere to go.
Thanks for your good advice, note they don't listen to good advice unless it makes them money. The UK government is busy with its head up its arse counting the backhanders
Pave paradise, put up a parking lot...js
Easy. Clear the drains properly, update them from Victorian quality, dredge the rivers, streams and canals as they should be, stop building houses on the flood planes and take council workers off Furlough and we will be fine as we have been every other year
If youre below ground water level drainage makes no difference
.
How to make a big change? End subsidies for animal agriculture. See how well the industry survives without constant governmental support.
Too many houses were built on flood-risk areas. There seems to be a love affair in the UK with low-density housing in the countryside, but this needs to change. The government should make it easier for developers to construct high-density housing (apartment buildings) in urban centres which are not at risk of flooding and which are close to amenities.
Cities in China built like that are flooded too.
@@casteretpollux so your telling me everyone s flats were flooded?
@@LonDanDoc No. Their roads, rail, subways, cabling systems etc.
Most modern cities are built on coastal arras or on/near large rivers... For trade, and transport and food.
Really we should be building on higher ground away from the water.
Unfortunately the high-rise buildings are too often made with concrete, a material that begins with high levels of pollution, water, and sand that close to complete loss. Add in dark facades, often made of various plastics (Grenfell) and heated by using natural gas.
There ARE far better alternatives to all these materials.
Developers want fast, cheap and very profitable buildings sold at higher prices.
Basically those buildings are the human version of chicken coops.
We have 95% CO2 emissions from these 3 sectors:
1) heating in winter (coal, oil, gas, some wood) 30% CO2 emissions
2) transportation (almost all on oil) about 28% CO2 emissions
3) electricity usage (55% of EL is produced with, you guess, coal, oil and gas, some wood) 25% CO2 emissions
We also have animal agriculture about 14% CO2 emissions
nothing the UK does will have any impact whatsoever. We are tiny.
@James Smith You appear to be keen to be insulting without purpose and to ignore your part in the equation
@@kevinb6831 no harm in trying. Especially as it was us that started the industrial revolution. It all started here steam engines, bicycles, soft porn lol. Considering how tiny our country is. It has made quite an impact on the world, for good and bad.
@@kevinb6831 everyone needs to do their part. We can't criticize the developing world while at the same thing enjoying the perks of emissions.
The benefits of going green are beyond climate change. It will benefit our physical and mental health.
@@grantm6933 I think you miss the point - the 'developing world' cannot develop if you have your way.
Why do we never hear about a global effort to plant more trees?
They'll just burn up, so why bother? Just look at all these forest fires
Because we can't tax trees.
@B don't make assumptions on where I stand on climate change please you smug little prick.
Alarmists
Your ignorance is stunning. How I wish i could be as ignorant as you.
Funny that they ban electric scooters even for short distance routes but try and force them to use deiseal vehicles instead.
There has always been the ' no fun rule' applied in these situations
I think we need to distinguish clearly between climate change and pollution. The former cannot be "controlled" whereas the latter can be.
Practically speaking, there is no way we can prevent floods, hurricanes, tsunamis and tornadoes from happening. But there is a lot we can do to reduce pollution.
The sad fact is that, no matter how much activists protest and talk, there is always more plastic in the supermarket, always more paper in our mailboxes (loads of unsolicited ads), always more and more people buying new cars with all the latest features, more and more planes criss-crossing the skies.Always more and more people buying the latest smartphones, tablets and computers.
And few think about where all the old phones, Ipads and computers end up. They are NOT biodegradable.
We have an unsatiable appetite for unlimited travel - and all the latest that technology has to offer -- and we want it 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Unless we - as a global community - are willing to make some serious changes to our lifestyles, I fear that any talk about climate change is ..... not terribly meaningful.
ive come to the conclusion that western culture is about the most ldiotic one there ever was but unfortunately ended up being the dominant one. native indians would never have let it come to this. aboriginals the same.
Agreed, and yet people are pointing fingers at anyone and everyone else instead of saving up for "plug and play" wind mini turbines to reduce dependency on large power generation done by fossil fuels.
Change out one window at a time to triple glazed.
Walk to the local stores and markets. Maybe get a bicycle for visiting family and friends.
Pull up all those lawns, plant food bushes, flowers for pollinators, trees for nuts, fruits, and put in perennial plants that provide food all year.
Don't buy clothes for "fashion, latest colours, etc but do buy clothes with natural fibre content.
Building embakments along rivers ,flood plains along river beds, raising the floor levels of houses. People need to adapt to the change in weather. conditions.
Stupid dangerous suggestions. You Dutch or something?
@@guff9567 how is building on flood planes not stupid unless you're stupid and 77th
@@lemdixon01 spot on. Completely and utterly stupid and the kind of pointless censorship we expect from the 77th.
@@lemdixon01 let me guess a climate change denialist? You lot are the 77th
@@guff9567 let me guess a climate change denialist? You lot are the 77th
Weather manipulation comming to full blown and not or our good.
Its already happening been happening in are area etc. For the last 6months look up in the sky.. And the amount of white lines coming frm certain aircraft are spawning out contrails, cremtails. Is changing the weather also..
Have to say, here in Scotland I remember cold white winters, we'd have weeks off school, this was only just a decade ago.
Now we get no snow, the past 4 summers we've had basically no rain and soaring temperatures
Where do you live?
Because where I am, it’s been thunderstorms and torrential rain, with a few warm days here and there.
This winter was mild, but the last few have been knee deep snow and constant minus figures.
@@Acheron666 the gulf stream is unstable so there are weather extremes as it fluctuates.
@@drey8
Yes….Over large distances, not over a few miles.
@@Acheron666 I meant the jet stream of course but it normally sits itself right above UK so weather systems do develop under that across miles.
@@drey8
I live in Scotland……..It has not been no rain, no snow and soaring temperatures the past 4 summers.
It’s been pissing down with rain all week, like it does for most of the year and we’ve had maybe a combined 7 to 10 days of hot weather every summer, along with the weather being average for the country.
It’s time to get corporations and bankers to pay for the damage they have done to humanity, better if government handles it otherwise people will rip them apart!!! We all had enough Tod this sons of Satan.
They are building everywhere the water has no where to go it's not the climate
Just start preparing for the Grand Solar Minimum. Simple. Cold weather crop losses. Geoengineering too
@Mark O'nee 1 Australian Murdoch media, of course... Devalues the information straight away!
You poor man. So deluded. But you and all the deniers will die alongside us believers. It won't save you!
@Q Schurz well you won't have to die on that hill because everyday we get closer to our goal of stopping climate change and your taxes have been steadily rising for years now due to that. We have kinda already succeeded in a way though we have a bit to go to save our planet still but you will pay for it with your taxes
Why don't you put graphs up of 500 years
Climate always changes and never stops.......
This man made warming is very fast and we should be actually very slowly cooling right now from natural causes not very fast heating.
Only difference is this time it’s changing way faster than any natural change of the earths climate could. But you clearly know more than the people who spend their entire lives studying the climate and the seriousness of the drastic change that’s happening right now smh 🤦♂️……...
@@klokoloko2114 if it is man made warming why is it colder not warmer ?
True. The earth is gradually heating up and it's nothing to do with man.. Fact. Tackle that,.. . British B's Channel!!
@@fakenewssucks211 Because you do not understand that minimum point of climate measurement is 1 year average temp.
See how is that going for your country.
Type in google: average year temp. history for (Germany) graph (your country).
Who told you that is getting colder?
The Cult is very much thirsty for power. Aren´t they?
Good comment, quite right.
We need to do all we can to prevent flooding but it is not good to keep building on our green belt. That should stop. Poorer people need help if gas boilers have to be replaced. Not everyone is in a cosy secure well paid job.
KEEP CUTTING THOSE TREE DOWN! WHO NEEDS A GREEN PLANET ANYWAY
Move everyone to inner 20 minute city area living on top of one another (affordable housing)
Great reset
The economic hardship , recession , unemployment and the loss of job caused by covid pandemic is enough to push people into financial ventures .
The economic hardship , recession , unemployment and the loss of job caused by covid pandemic is enough to push people into financial ventures .
@@emilygeorge87 all strategically planned
@@UnknownUser-by4le Many years ago.
It don’t work look at the 50’s-60’s high rise blocks!!
Vile disgraceful buildings cold damp unsafe and often crime and drug ridden.
Why shouldn’t people have a house and a garden!
I'm concerned about British nature and climate.
What a great nature!
Corporations bankers and rich will destroy it very soon! They only care about money and themselves
@@YourConscience777 I'm agreed with you. It's quite sad.
@Peter Hicks People is true power we just do not realise it yet. Without us modern slaves as they call us, they can not do anything.
The boat has already capsized and people are discussing how to handle the oars.
What is climate change, I've never heard of it
whats ur age
@@libl2915 where do you live
Look it up pretty scary stuff
@@zeffy._440 fear mongering to put up taxes and return us to serfdom which is all part of limits to growth written by the elites. elites own bother energy and oil companies as "renewables" creates new markets and more profits but higher energy bills to fund subsidies and carbon taxes, look it up.
@@lemdixon01
Nevada just shutdown a solar panel farm because they couldn't get buyers for their electricity....js
If we, the people, dont act ie: start growing and producing our own food and resources at home and amoungst our own streets and communities outside of the governments "authority" and completely naturally ie not using fossil fuels or electric, then this society is fu£@ed. To put it in simple terms 🤣🙏
That’s not feasible on a large scale. We can’t keep putting the responsibility on the individual consumer. We need large systemic change, increased international solidarity, and a reform in the way we do business.
This is England the weather is temperamental
What are these fools talking about .... rain when we don’t expect it
Plant more trees!
They are cutting them for 5Gee.
won't make much difference to climate change at this point. If we are screwed, we're screwed already.
its allways raining in england even in summer wr used to it
'Boris Johnson is his own man' no media bias then?
Think they just mean he's strong willed and not bothered what other people think for better or for worse. Hard to disagree with that
increased sunshine? are you having a absolute laugh?!? one of the worst summers i can remember
Selective statistics I remember much hotter and wetter you are misinformed
Does anyone else notice the vastly different approaches our media apply to interviewing a Tory versus Labour MP
Please don’t try to tell me there’s any neutrality left in journalism
That's because one party is in power and the other isn't.
Turn off the BBC.
You can do little about Climate change, as it is a natural phenomenon . Yes mankind may be adding to it, but we know that the climate has always changed, even massively in the past as scientists have told us, so why do we think it would stop now for our convenience?
The climate only changed because of our greenhouse gas emissions.
Affordable? Yea, losing your house in a flash flood or in a forest fire is affordable? Or having food and water in your table is affordable to lose? And all the environment with all the species is affordable to lose too?
Talking about economy without having ecological losses within is just nuts, but hey we have been there centuries already... All economies have made a total miss calculation and left all natural damages out. We take what we want from nature - with zero economical costs and we use that stuff days and then we toss wastes back in the nature (most times in a format that nature can't handle)...
Cancel the TV license now folks.
Turn off state brainwashing.
You're boring
@@davidatkins3498 Spot on i think, stop the brainwashing of the sheeple.
@@dotexe55games31 what brainwashing?
@@davidatkins3498 If you think everything the MSM push is fact, then you are brainwashed by them :-/
Try some good old critical thinking....
Drew speaks as a true leader.Everybody follow Drew.
By not worrying about it. It has been changing for thousands of years.
Hurray 👍 that's what the climate does..
and will consider to do so.
A few years ago the globe was warming. Now it's just changing.
Your ignorance is stunning.
I lost braincells reading that I think I contracting your stupidity briefly
@@zeffy._440 You can only squeal in internet. You won't talk that much in front of me.
World: Global warming is causing floods in Germany, China, Britain, New Zealand and America.
US: "The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive." D.Trump
Native: "Your kids can name more KPop groups than they can types of native trees." Sean Sherman
China: "Ecology is a resource, wealth and treasure." Xi Jinping.
Climate Change > "I'm from the government and I'm here to help"
Idiet. Depends on the Government.
@1:52 and we found the real reason for this being pushed right now, more money for the old boys network.
Exactly. looting before the socialist pension debts collapse.
COLDEST APRIL AND MAY ON RECORD.
Oh dear... Are you confusing weather patterns with climate change? Aww... Bless... Soooo sweet! 🤣 🤣 🤣
Too little, too late. 👎
what a bunch of bullshit #weathercontrol
Tony Heller has analysed the data, and the graphs are always shown with the initial figures fraudulently lowered.
We have had a couple of atmospheric rivers in the past while. Now, people look at this and cannot conceive of the situation elsewhere on the planet. The rate of desertification that is taking place right now is mind numbing. People having to make a mass exodus from their landsis staggering. Our weather is being manipulated and they use "climate change" as an excuse to justify these unexplainable weather anomalies.
Aw not acceptable from such a once great BBC. Self importance and big words from a crummy tv company
By giving more green tax dodges to billionaires corporations . We need to pay more carbon tax to billionaires . Fools
I skipped Allegra's talk because it's bs. The rest of the programme is very good
Taking a historical view of change, have humans been better adapters or controllers? How fruitless it will be if we see ourselves as able to control the weather by changing our boilers.
We are very good at controlling our influence...
Ask Gorillas, Mink and Humpback whales... ask Murry Cod...
You seem to imply that Climate Change is inevitable and nothing to do with Humans... Both proven wrong.
Humans lived for millions of years by moving out of danger zones and living very, very simply.
Why do people complain hot summer and then run to Spain, Greece or Thailand for hot summer beach holidays? Just have fun at home. Make Coke and Pepsi to stop digging out water. They should use surface water or desalination water to sell their beverages.
Again the UK stable door , horse ect .
you build next to a river what do you expect
China contributes more than the three highest contributing countries combined. So I feel like no significant changes can occur without if China is not going to change as well.
China IS changing, just at a slower pace cos still a developing country.
The worlds number one producer of solar pv^
This illogical excuse not to take action wouldnt work in any other setting
You wouldnt allow someone else's laziness/poverty/morals to dictate ur actions
We shouldn't.
The idea that Boris has a conscience!
As a Japanese 🇯🇵 Japans🇯🇵 rising Sun felt in the UK.
Like dinosaurs, we have had our time. Other creatures will survive
Distracted by the weird EMPHASIS on RANDOM words
Don't bother tackling it. Climate change saved 555,103 lives in England and Wales between 2001 and 2020 (ONS, 2022). Go Climate change!
Greed, start a polar shift for buried treasure🐽
bbc, in blue studio why some always has to walk in and sit in front of someone already sitting at table?
Keep work from home wherever possible, rather than irresponsibily lecturing people to "get back to the office". There will be an economic impact, but we're supposed to be in a "climate emergency" right?
The doublethink practiced by this government is laughable.
You may believe from this report that Allegra Stratton is a scientist or someone who is actually qualified to talk about this complex subject. Actually she is a former journalist who studied archeology and anthropology. She is BJ’s former press secretary. More Tory hype and Boris bullshit.
All politics is BS
You're crazy.
Anthropology is a social science, a kind of lesser science dealing with probabilities and statistics, computer models, not truth.
@@lemdixon01 she is not a meteorologist which is the science of studying the weather and atmosphere, she is a journalist and Conservative party shill.
@@Chrishagen you believe the party system, huh? Neither represent the people. Science is becoming a religion or a wing of the government like Soviet Scientists or sponsored by big business, so its a false choice of corperatism or communism as neither represent the people.
The futility and arrogance. To think that humans who have been on the planet for a relative blink of an eye could have an influence and affect on an ecology that is billions and billions of years old. Laughable.
How can you possibly ignore the impact we've had on ecology in the past 200 years? Arrogance indeed.
Human-based climate change started in the 1830s. We're not discussing natural climate change here and you know this.
We made this happen, we can reverse it, but we're almost out of time.
Refusing to take responsibility surely won't help.
It would be nice if governments would fix it but their too busy trying to cling onto power
One way would be to ignore this tripe and vote the bums out.
BBC: tackle climate change?
me: you make china stays in its own house, and at least 20% of all problems on earth solved.
Unfortunately that is not profitable
Whataboutism is a logical fallacy
Kinda bizarre that we have been home for a couple years and yet all this climate change is getting out of control.
@Peter Hicks At last someone understands. Using that weather modification machine, it is easy to disguise it behind the weather. I mean who's going to question the weather? Even though they were using it in the Vietnam war which can be searched online, people to lazy to do research on that machine.
@Peter Hicks you right wingers i know will never ever admit you were wrong and the left were right. you will just make up more conspiracy nonsense. you'll be making up conspiracies to your last drop of drinkable water. which probably wont be too long from now
@Peter Hicks, I only got this notification today, unbelievable. Also, I noticed BBC deleted some replies. I totally agree with you, & with that energy field they can just deliver it at will.
@Peter Hicks bla bla bla i dont have time for your crap
Head down to off license, load up on gin, beer, cider, and stay as drunk as possible (the routine) and hope Harry and Schmegans are OK.🌏🌏🌏😀😀😍
make it warmer and stop complaining about global warming
Most of Earth's history has been warmer
Amazing how weak labour is on this when this should be home turf for them.
Change our FPTP undemocratic voting system which is exactly why we only have 1 Green MP. In a guaranteed “safe” Tory seat…..my vote has bee totally pointless for 30 years.
Introduce. Strict. Carbon. Taxation.... Price in the externalities across all industries. This is economics 101.
Econ student here and I agree. Pricing negative externalities heavily that arise from pollution alongside a strict and large carbon emission tax is a good idea though setting up the guidelines won't be very easy to do still we have to find a way to do so though but thanks to current capitalism that's not happening due to lobbying which is a staple of our current economic system
Future living under water - Baba Vanga prediction.
Also a Busted song
You can't tackle "nature", the often forgotten aspect whenever "climate change" is discussed.
The sun rises and sets each day, this is called the "day cycle" ... a period of light and warmth followed by dark and cold.
The sun also proceeds north then south, the "seasonal cycle" bringing warmth then cold.
The sun goes through a "solar cycle" in which it outputs a higher frequency of energy "solar maximum" before descending to a lower output "solar minimum" ... which operates on a period of about 11 years.
These are observable cycles, you can observe longer cycles outside of this i.e. in the 1750s the period between the solar maximum & solar minimum where much longer, since the mid-1800s the period has decreased.
The fact these cycles are ignored, "climate scientists" often parroted by the media point only at the chemical composition of the atmosphere > the claim that only man could effect that.
Also, given "world leaders" only seem to care about "climate change" when trying to enforce some thing upon the people they "govern", their motives should be questioned i.e. "world leaders" so concerned about "climate change" yet travel on their own private aircrafts, splurging money on supporting technology [wind, solar, battery] that require significant resources to be extracted from the earth or the tearing down of trees & greenland [which ironically are the solution to "excess" CO2] to make way for "high-speed" trains which the average person will likely never use.
The climate on earth has always changed, regardless of man, it will continue to change again regardless of what man does ...
Some people make dams other people breaking ice to make canals... other people and mother nature suffers.
As if it is a local issue....look at those enormous fires in Siberia...if the Permafrost melts away there is nothing more we can do...
Every ton of carbon we excavate from deep ground it's extra CO2 in air that will makes things even worse.
So we can do a lot!
It's a global issue. Domestic reforms are part of a global solution. Giving up just means your grandkids will definitely be shiving each other for the last mouthful of potable water.
Was watching a program about the coldest place on earth minus 72. And they have been finding a lot more of mamoths than ever before. There are things in the ice that have been preserved. Things that we might not want
Again not actually answering questions, just providing responses. No solid goals they'll commit to.
Do they want a serious answer?
jack harries also mentioned about that in great details
No green pass.
1,5C is just not possible. Not even with IPCC's own report.
Best IPCC scenario was 1,4C and that included many flaws. Starting line was 2015 and after that we have already emitted 5,5 years more carbon with 8.5 pathway adding around 0,1C to IPCC's model the temperature (ie. here said 1,2C which is 0,1C higher than IPCC's used 1,1C). Aerosols are pretty messed up in lower scenarios. IPCC says 0,4C aerosol cooling currently and when we pahse out fossil burning that means 0,4C warming leading to 1,5C alone. Then IPCC added 300-500GtCO2e to the mix, so all their emission pathways stays on positive signs... And they even say "Additional ecosystem responses to warming not yet fully included in climate models, such as CO2 and CH4 fluxes from wetlands, permafrost thaw and wildfires, would further increase concentrations of these gases in the atmosphere (high confidence). {5.4, Box TS.5, TS.3.2}". Most non-linear responses are not there and we have already gone over Amazon rainforest tipping point where the forest can no longer inhale carbon, but instead emits it (2 studies in 2021). IPCC has even chosen industrial era 1850-1900 to their preindustrial starting point (because it has better data, but still). And then there's around 1600GtCO2e of uncertainties which could mean max. around 0,5C warming (or unlikely cooling).
So IPCC has made political reasoning and made the data look like we have a chance for 1,5C. But if you read what I said, that's only a politically needed lie.
When adding a low tipping element forcings you'll soon end up to a world over 3,0C warming by 2100 and likely 2,0C by 2050. And that's where I think we are going even if we try to avoid further heating.
Bit too late now. I guess we're all doomed already. Just need to brace ourselves for the impacts
yes it's true , there is no way we could de-escalate this problem by "delaying "all ways to slow this disaster
Or just chill, stop listening to the propaganda and let nature do its thing. The arrogance of man to think we can affect the earth's climate is staggering.
Impact for the fake climate change narrative
@@alexwatson5507 we've affected the climate already because of climate change
I think we can use ram pumps to solve the energy crisis. First we build a hollow cylindrical tower out at sea, to a depth of say 1100m. The tower is open to the air at the top and has a sealed base at the bottom. We drill a hole about 20m below the surface and feed water into the tower. The water falls down a pipe for about 200m where it powers a turbine that is connected to an electricity generator. We collect the water and drop it down a pipe for another 200m to another turbine. We do this twice more until we are getting electricity from four generators.
We then drop the water another 200m to power a turbine which drives a cog that is geared to turn a disc at the base of the tower. The waste water from the last turbine starts to collect at the bottom of the tower creating a shallow reservoir that we need to pump out.
The rotating disc at the base of the tower has cams along its edge. These cams are used to push pistons outwards. These pistons are in cylinders built into the wall in a circular formation. The cylinders are sealed at the interior side apart from where a piston rod enters to push the piston outward. The outside of the piston head is exposed to the deep sea water.
The cam will push the piston outward against the high pressure deep sea water. An inlet pipe will take water from our shallow reservoir which will be pulled into the space created in the cylinder, behind the piston head. When the cam releases the piston, the low pressure water inside the cylinder will be the only thing pushing the piston out against the high pressure deep sea water.
This is when the system acts as a ram pump.
The piston will be forced inward and will force the low pressure water back out through the inlet pipe toward the reservoir. The inlet pipe will now act the same as a waste pipe in a ram pump and the flowing water will shut a waste valve. The remaining water in the cylinder will be forced through a check valve into a pipe and upwards to the surface.
The larger the diameter of the tower, the more cylinders that can be built into the wall at the base of the tower.
I realise that the ram pump cylinder will pump more of its water back into the reservoir than it sends to the surface but we can always add more cylinders to the system. We can even put another layer of cylinders above the original ones as ram pumps still work underneath shallow water.
I think we should be able to pump water upwards at the same rate that it falls into the bottom of the tower and so keep the reservoir nice and shallow.
Now, if I understand the maths correctly, we might only be able to pump the water near to the surface. In that case, we can pump the water into a reservoir tank (inside the tower) and use the electricity generated by the first turbine to pump out the tank.
This will leave us with 3 generators worth of electricity for every tower built.
Would this work? Everyone, please comment.
"Reacting with the gravity that we need to be" my #ss, these people think they are living on the moon.
The contribution the average person can make is choose plant based food instead of animal foods.
Hahahaha
🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😂 🙄
@@marvinflatt6947 it would seem that statement is extremely humorous to you? I am missing the joke I think. Perhaps you can explain?
@@BuddhaOfDarkness I’m failing to see the humour? In your opinion, why exactly is there a humorous element to this?
@@BuddhaOfDarkness also is the irony that a person with a youtube account called 'leecifer Voorhees' with a picture of a super 'scary' skull would call someone a 'kiduld' and a ' freakish narcissist'? Is the world suddenly devoid of irony? self awareness? Really? How is it you are impervious to your own judgment of yourself? How?!
I need a lawyer, the case is open I cant say the name of the Multinational. I'm in London and afraid, false publicity on the environment and the evidence is devastating. I thanks the Parliament to have stop them but when it came of blowing the whistle no help for the case.
The world population is too high that's why the earth is seriously warming
no FK BILLIONAIRES not all the straws in the world will cover a single jet setting billionaire #OutlawBillionaires #EndWealthHoarders #UBINow
free public transport.
First we need to plant much mour trees and mour River defences and stop buildings house in low level ground
All westerners could just stop consuming (except food and drinks) for a year. We already have enough. And all that stuff has made its impact to the nature already and continuing consumerism just makes things worse.
Rinsing dishes is not a big problem. Animal farming is a huge cause of climate change. Don’t worry about dishes, stop eating animals.
Car usage is a bigger cause. People should drive cars less.
@@flashfm7456 car usage is likely bigger than rinsing dishes yeah but not animal agriculture. Animals agriculture contributes to more climate change causes than the entire of transport combined
No green enviroment without nuclear power.
No imagination...get out of the box.
Please elaborate!
Is out of the box wind and solarenergy?
If so we are fkd..
If out of the box nuclear energy generation 4, we will burn the uranium with just 500 years in storage until its non lethal.. contra 100.000 years storage we got thousands of tons stored in bedrock.
We all got a responsibility for our past generations mistakes.
Screaming for wind and solar power is like being an ostrich sticking head in the sand.
Look at the background! Hard surfaces everywhere. What is the best change to make? Far less concrete and asphalt, more permeable surfaces, along with far more green infrastructure, green spaces that have trees, undergrowth and zero lawns. Rainwater collection in each home, far less fossil fuel heating, and far fewer vehicles.
Nope, not going to happen because money.
Seriously? How much more money are people going to spend next year, the years after?
We had such a very cold spring and summer is not much better.
Tackling something that docent exist will bankrupt us.
Where is that, because there isn't a single country that is experiencing cooling. But maybe you're so dense that you think temps taken with a thermometer on your back porch for a few weeks is the same as global temps for 200 years.
Admit it... you've been duped by right-wing media.