Although this scenario is very Unrealistic and Impossible, I think we can agree that this is one of the most powerful Alliance between Three Biggest Empire on that time
@@rewriting-history She wouldn't be so happy anymore when united kingdom rejected the tsars to live in their land, which lead to the execution of the tsars.
@@rewriting-historyWell the non believers cannot enter Mecca Madina and they cannot damage it the only people are also said that can damage Mecca and Madina are the Muslims Allah said he will protect Mecca and Madina so even if Mecca and Madina is taken by the ottomans it will be through the Arab not the non believer British
@@rewriting-historyWell the non believers cannot enter Mecca Madina and they cannot damage it the only people are also said that can damage Mecca and Madina are the Muslims Allah said he will protect Mecca and Madina so even if Mecca and Madina is taken by the ottomans it will be through the Arab not the non believer British
Proposal: What would have happened to Italy if General Alberto Polio (Chief of Staff of the Italian Army from 1908 to 1914) had not died of a heart attack in 1914 and had successfully convinced the Italian government to join the fight on the side of the Central Powers. According to what I have learned from his Italian Wiki, he was considered a capable general of the Italian army whose research on the Battle of Waterloo was highly regarded by the German General Staff, and he even discussed with the Austrian Chief of Staff Conrad von Hötzendorf the plan to transfer the Austrian and German railways to Italian divisions to reach the Rhine border. In order to become part of the left wing of the German army in the Schlieffen Plan. And most importantly, this general was considered a staunch supporter of the Central Powers, having married a high-ranking Austrian noblewoman and having a very good relationship with General Von Moltke and General Von Hötzendorf (his death in 1914 is considered a reason why Italy abandoned the Central Powers and joined the Entente in 1915). Fun fact: at the time Alberto Polio was the chief of staff of the Italian army, General Luigi Cadorna was the commander of the Genoan army stationed near the French border. He was actively building forts and training soldiers in preparation for a war (according to Cadorna) that was about to come with France.
Interessting proposal... hmmm, the additional manpower early in the conflict WOULD have made it more likely for the Central Powers to achieve a breakthrough, especially if Austrian and Italian Troops would've been deployed in that area, freeing up several German divisions that could've either lent more weight and power to the southern parts or could have been used as reserves in the north... hmmm.... That is assuming that things in the east pan out in a similar fashion as they did historically - both the good and the bad (from the CPs point of view).
@@MajorCoolD Although it is quite complicated, I can offer some of the things I can think of (note that Italy would have entered the war in 1914): 1 Of course the Italians would have been much better prepared for war than they were in real life as the main force facing France, the Genoan Army, had been prepared for war for about 2-3 years. 2 The Schlieffen Plan would have been much more successful than it was in real life as it had an additional 100-150k Italians on the left flank to support it. Plus a small Austro-Hungarian force (about 50-100k) instead of being stationed on the Italian border in 1914 would have been involved in the Schlieffen Plan. Similarly the French and British forces on the Western Front would have been significantly smaller due to the large number of troops being sent to the Franco-Italian front. Although it is hard to say whether the Schlieffen Plan would have been successful with these things. 3 German military operations on the Western Front would be more effective because they had fewer French and British troops to deal with. Also Austria-Hungary could actually support Germany on the Western Front because they did not have the burden of the Italian front. It is likely that the French military would maintain a defensive doctrine throughout the war because of this. 4 While we can debate the capabilities of General Luigi Cadorna. It is important to note that his war plans and objectives for Austria forced the Austrian general staff to maintain a large force (nearly 20 divisions) consisting mostly of Austria's best units. Because they would rather lose Galicia to Russia than have Italy directly threaten Vienna. It is likely that Luigi Cadorna would do the same with France combined with German and Austrian support. This would force the Anglo-French forces to commit between 250k and up to 400k to defend the area. 5 The absence of the Italian front would simply have made the Austro-Hungarian army more effective. Because they would not have had to spend nearly 20 divisions fighting Italy. As a result they would have had better results on the Serbian front and with Russia. 6 Similarly the Eastern front would have ended sooner. Because there would have been more Austro-Hungarian troops there and less pressure on the Western front. This would have allowed Germany to exploit the region's resources much more effectively than in real life. 7 The Balkan front would have been much bleaker for the Entente because in real life Italy helped evacuate part of the Serbian army to Greece and Albania after they were routed by Bulgaria. But with Italy joining the Central Powers, this would not have happened. And Greece would have simply had to deal almost alone with the Italians in Albania + the Bulgarians + the Austro-Hungarians + possibly the Ottomans. A disaster for them. 8 With Italy as an ally, the Ottomans would have faced less pressure on the Sinai-Levant front because the British would have had to deal with the Italian garrison in Libya. And if I remember correctly, in 1914, there were 100-150k Italian troops stationed in Libya combined with the Ottomans in the Levant, which was more than enough for the Central Powers to threaten the Suez Canal. Similarly, France would have had to send troops to Tunisia to deal with the Italian garrison in Libya. 9 The Gallipoli campaign probably would not have taken place because the Italian navy could have ambushed and disrupted the logistics of the campaign. While the Ottomans, Austro-Hungarians, and Bulgarians had much less pressure and problems than in real life. And that also meant that the pressure and losses suffered by the Ottomans would have been even lower. 10 With the presence of the Italian Navy, the British navy would have had to withdraw some ships from the North Sea. Allowed the German Navy to operate more effectively and undermined the Entente's plans for a naval blockade of Germany.
With a British Navy, Russia being so close to Alaska and Germany always eyeing US Asian Colonies the US Wouldn't just be nervous, they would terrified in what they think would be inevetible, A Large Naval war.
Nicholas ii wasn't Queen Victoria's grandson his wife was her granddaughter but he and George V were both grandchildren of Christian IX of Denmark.....
More like the British parliament. The crazy thing was, Russia was goated into war by France and seduced into it by Britain with Constantinople as a reward.
RH, Russo-Japanese war happened because Russia was greedy for Korea, not because Russia wanted Manchurian lands. Russia wanted to partition Korea with Japan on top of getting all of Manchuria, and Japan took that as a huge insult and therefore fighting started soon after.
@@PeekasLukkala it was not he but his wife Alexandra who was a grandchild of Queen victoria. He was in no way related to her. Just search up his grandparents on google. His father was the son of Alexander II and Maria Alexandrovna of Hesse. His mother was a Danish princess the daughter of Christian IX and Louise of Hesse Kassel. He was related to George V because their mothers were sisters, Nicholas II and Wilhelm II were more distantly related.
Yay, I'm glad that you revisited the concept of alternate alliances in WWI. Another fun one would be Russia and Austro-Hungarian empire - Pretty likely considering that the empire was Russia's close ally for a long time, only to fall into political isolation thanks to not helping them in the Crimean war.
George V and Tsar Nicholas were cousins through their mothers which were princesses from Denmark. while George V and Wilhelm was cousins through queen victoria. Tsar Nicholas and wilhelm were not cousins. So george and nicholas just got their mothers genes, maybe.
Correction: Dreadnoughts are not super heavy battleships, they are all big gun battleships, which would become a redundant term later on, as all Battleships would be built with all big guns later on. (Note: There were exceptions to this rule, as there were some pre dreadnoughts that were finished after Dreadnought, some (Dantons) even laid down afterwards.)
Why would Italy ally itself to Austria after Bosnia, if there was a country which was pissed off at the annexation of Bosnia it was Italy, mainly bc one of the terms of the triple alliance was that they couldn't expand in the balkans without consulting their allies first, but Austria didn't notify Italy, so Italy didn't ratify the triple alliance and started a mission in Vlore to exert influence in albania. It was specifically this the biggest reason Italy didn't join ww1 on the CP side, also otl they had to choose between trying to get Nice, Savoy, Corsica and a lot of colonies or Trento, Trieste and Dalmatia, here they don't even have to chose as all their enemies are allied, they are a natural ally of the cousins' alliance, it makes no sense for them to be allied to France and Austria
Bro just read through the comments. Some people miss these warnings and insult me that I think it could have happened. I need to do them as I don't want people to know that I am for real
17:43 "France would lose some minor French colonies" Picture:Literially all French possession in Africa is taken except for Algeria and empty land in the Sahara.
Idk I feel like it isn’t that far fetched for Britain and France to be hostile to each other considering they had only been friendly for like 50 years vs over 500 years of fighting. And Germany had fought a war with Austria recently as well.
I think the same too. Maybe I should have mentioned France in the video, saying that they are also rivals to Britain. I think that Napoleon III finally allied with the British, so after he is deposed and the Republic came to power, they continued that. Maybe Napoleon doesn't get captured at Sedan, but is still deposed and somebody else from the house of Bonaparte comes to charge, but with anti-British views
12:33 yoooo, morroco mentioned! Although, france had already started occupying most of the country before 1911, at that point they were already at the doors of the capital, so yeah, And even if the frensh back down, british loans to pay the spanish and german preferential treatment would probably cause even more revolts to erupt, requiring foreign intervention to quell them, ending up not independent anyways
I wrote an alternate history just like this while I was bored in my world history class, except Britain just kept up the rivalry with France and Prussia with Austria, leading Britain to ally with Germany and Austria to ally with France. Then Russia went to war with Austria when Franz Ferdinand was assassinated, France saw this as an attack against their ally so they joined the war, and Germany and Britain joined the war on Russia’s side to ensure that France and Austria do not become too powerful.
I think something similar could be possible, if Whillelm II's father, Kaiser Frederich III, who died 88 days after coronation, didn't smoke, he was a liberal, and wanted to reform Germany into a Constitutional monarchy like britain, Bismarck already was preparing for his reign, so Most likely he wouldn't be fired, With Both Frederich III and Bismarck seeking an Alliance with Britain, and If, like in the video, Edward VII dies earlier, An Alliance with Britain could be possible. As For Russia, if Alexander ii wasn't killed, he would have stablished a earlier duma, making russia a Constitutional monarchy like britain, again, and could improve relations. With Bismarck remaining and without Whillelm II, Bismarck could renew the Three Cousin Alliance or instead, Choosing/Aprooching an Alliance with Russia, like how they did with Áustria-Hungary, since they had similar regimes and their family ties
Wilhelm II loved his grandmother and used these familial ties to foster better relations between both countries. As Germany helped the British in South Africa, the proximity could have been used to keep both countries close. The proble is that Edward VII hated Wilhelm II with passion. He did everything he could to harm the British German relations, including pushing Britain closer to France. Now, the Russo-French Entente was a thorn on the side of both Britain (Great Game) & Germany (European hegemony intentions).
What if britain failed to stop news of a freedom fighter (Netaji) in burma from reaching indian public in ww2 and the stationed indian army turned against the raj
While Georg V was cousin to both Wilhelm II and Nicolas II (having common grand-parents with each), these to were a bit further away from each other - Nicolas' paternal great-great-grand-parents (Paul I and Sophie) were also great-great-grand-parents of Wilhelm II, plus Wilhelm II's paternal great-grand-parents (Friedrich Wilhelm III and Louise) were also great-great-grand-parents to Nicolas II. Though this double connection between the prussian and russian royal/imperial houses was already 2-3 generations old. Edward II was actually even closer related to Wilhelm II than Georg V was (Uncle instead of Cousin), so at least the closer relations to Germany could easily have started before his death. With Georg V taking over, they would both take Russia into the boat.
Is your map based on HoI4? Because the more I watch your videos, the more I notice similarities between them, such as Britain being further away from mainland Europe, Ukraine's shape looking weird and Luxembourg not having a border with France if Germany owns Alsace-Lorraine. Just asking out of curiosity lol
I got an idea. What if the proposal for the “United states of the Earth” Succeeds? Basically,in 1893 someone proposed for the United States to change its name to the United States of the earth. Because of the new states joining at the time,he thought the USA could expand until it controlled the whole world
can you make a video about if the habsburgs won the spanish war of succession? it wont be to unrealistic because the main reason the bourbons won (from what ive heard) is because france wouldnt give up when they were losing heavily and dragged out the war so long that the habsburg claiming the spanish throne ascended to emperor of the HRE after 2 emperors died and nobody wanted him to have that much power so they let the bourbons be in charge so all that needs to change is france giving up or the 2 HRE emperors living longer
Britain, Germany and Russia forming an alliance? That would've been terrifying. In fact, that would've been the new central powers, but instead of Germany being the only one that is competent, both their allies are.
but why did italy side with france and austria-hungary? I mean they didn't even had a border with their enemies and they still held territorial claims on france
Paused at 5:33 - Why do you need to eliminate Edward VII? Why not allow Victoria herself to propose the alliance, or even just allow Edward VII to see the benefits and pursue the alliance? True it would no longer technically be a cousins alliance but it would provide the same effect.
I feel like Italy would join the cousins alliance because they could have a easy victory with opportunities to expand into southern France Tunisia Austria Hungary and the Ottoman Empire
I agree here, but I wanted to make a more interesting video, because all of France, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire performed poorly in the Great War, so them being the only allies would make for a really boring video
Although this scenario is very Unrealistic and Impossible, I think we can agree that this is one of the most powerful Alliance between Three Biggest Empire on that time
100% yes, and its actually really interesting
Queen Victoria would be proud of them
I mean most likely she would want this to happen
@@rewriting-history true
@@rewriting-history
She wouldn't be so happy anymore when united kingdom rejected the tsars to live in their land, which lead to the execution of the tsars.
@@rewriting-historyWell the non believers cannot enter Mecca Madina and they cannot damage it the only people are also said that can damage Mecca and Madina are the Muslims Allah said he will protect Mecca and Madina so even if Mecca and Madina is taken by the ottomans it will be through the Arab not the non believer British
@@rewriting-historyWell the non believers cannot enter Mecca Madina and they cannot damage it the only people are also said that can damage Mecca and Madina are the Muslims Allah said he will protect Mecca and Madina so even if Mecca and Madina is taken by the ottomans it will be through the Arab not the non believer British
Proposal: What would have happened to Italy if General Alberto Polio (Chief of Staff of the Italian Army from 1908 to 1914) had not died of a heart attack in 1914 and had successfully convinced the Italian government to join the fight on the side of the Central Powers. According to what I have learned from his Italian Wiki, he was considered a capable general of the Italian army whose research on the Battle of Waterloo was highly regarded by the German General Staff, and he even discussed with the Austrian Chief of Staff Conrad von Hötzendorf the plan to transfer the Austrian and German railways to Italian divisions to reach the Rhine border. In order to become part of the left wing of the German army in the Schlieffen Plan. And most importantly, this general was considered a staunch supporter of the Central Powers, having married a high-ranking Austrian noblewoman and having a very good relationship with General Von Moltke and General Von Hötzendorf (his death in 1914 is considered a reason why Italy abandoned the Central Powers and joined the Entente in 1915).
Fun fact: at the time Alberto Polio was the chief of staff of the Italian army, General Luigi Cadorna was the commander of the Genoan army stationed near the French border. He was actively building forts and training soldiers in preparation for a war (according to Cadorna) that was about to come with France.
Interessting proposal... hmmm, the additional manpower early in the conflict WOULD have made it more likely for the Central Powers to achieve a breakthrough, especially if Austrian and Italian Troops would've been deployed in that area, freeing up several German divisions that could've either lent more weight and power to the southern parts or could have been used as reserves in the north... hmmm....
That is assuming that things in the east pan out in a similar fashion as they did historically - both the good and the bad (from the CPs point of view).
@@MajorCoolD Although it is quite complicated, I can offer some of the things I can think of (note that Italy would have entered the war in 1914):
1 Of course the Italians would have been much better prepared for war than they were in real life as the main force facing France, the Genoan Army, had been prepared for war for about 2-3 years.
2 The Schlieffen Plan would have been much more successful than it was in real life as it had an additional 100-150k Italians on the left flank to support it. Plus a small Austro-Hungarian force (about 50-100k) instead of being stationed on the Italian border in 1914 would have been involved in the Schlieffen Plan. Similarly the French and British forces on the Western Front would have been significantly smaller due to the large number of troops being sent to the Franco-Italian front. Although it is hard to say whether the Schlieffen Plan would have been successful with these things.
3 German military operations on the Western Front would be more effective because they had fewer French and British troops to deal with. Also Austria-Hungary could actually support Germany on the Western Front because they did not have the burden of the Italian front. It is likely that the French military would maintain a defensive doctrine throughout the war because of this.
4 While we can debate the capabilities of General Luigi Cadorna. It is important to note that his war plans and objectives for Austria forced the Austrian general staff to maintain a large force (nearly 20 divisions) consisting mostly of Austria's best units. Because they would rather lose Galicia to Russia than have Italy directly threaten Vienna. It is likely that Luigi Cadorna would do the same with France combined with German and Austrian support. This would force the Anglo-French forces to commit between 250k and up to 400k to defend the area.
5 The absence of the Italian front would simply have made the Austro-Hungarian army more effective. Because they would not have had to spend nearly 20 divisions fighting Italy. As a result they would have had better results on the Serbian front and with Russia.
6 Similarly the Eastern front would have ended sooner. Because there would have been more Austro-Hungarian troops there and less pressure on the Western front. This would have allowed Germany to exploit the region's resources much more effectively than in real life.
7 The Balkan front would have been much bleaker for the Entente because in real life Italy helped evacuate part of the Serbian army to Greece and Albania after they were routed by Bulgaria. But with Italy joining the Central Powers, this would not have happened. And Greece would have simply had to deal almost alone with the Italians in Albania + the Bulgarians + the Austro-Hungarians + possibly the Ottomans. A disaster for them.
8 With Italy as an ally, the Ottomans would have faced less pressure on the Sinai-Levant front because the British would have had to deal with the Italian garrison in Libya. And if I remember correctly, in 1914, there were 100-150k Italian troops stationed in Libya combined with the Ottomans in the Levant, which was more than enough for the Central Powers to threaten the Suez Canal. Similarly, France would have had to send troops to Tunisia to deal with the Italian garrison in Libya.
9 The Gallipoli campaign probably would not have taken place because the Italian navy could have ambushed and disrupted the logistics of the campaign. While the Ottomans, Austro-Hungarians, and Bulgarians had much less pressure and problems than in real life. And that also meant that the pressure and losses suffered by the Ottomans would have been even lower.
10 With the presence of the Italian Navy, the British navy would have had to withdraw some ships from the North Sea. Allowed the German Navy to operate more effectively and undermined the Entente's plans for a naval blockade of Germany.
FINALLY MY FAVOURITE ALTERNATE HISTORY HAS BEEN MADE LETS GOOOO 🔥🔥🔥
I hope you liked my take!
@@rewriting-historyyoure very famous on a roblox game just so yk
+10000 aura
@@rewriting-history bro you can make a full series from this like the old one
Nice
We need a part 2 for WW2 EVEN IF IT IS UNREALISTIC
Τυρόπιτα>>>>>>>>
I agree for part 2
UK-Germany-USSR v. USA-France-Italy-Japan
@@gumdeothe UK going red line and Germany doing alliance with USSR? you just give me another cursed HOI4 multiplayer idea
Britain, Russia and Germany in an Alliance in 1910?
France would cry, Austria-Hungary would beg and the USA would be nervous.
With a British Navy, Russia being so close to Alaska and Germany always eyeing US Asian Colonies the US Wouldn't just be nervous, they would terrified in what they think would be inevetible, A Large Naval war.
@@SunnyEggLoverWouldn’t that also mean the Americans would rapidly do military build up much earlier?
@sanejingliufan well in that case we may see pearl harbor done by battleships in this timeline
So, French and Americans defeated early? Absolutely marvelous
The fact that this video is 19:11 minutes long is the cherry on top
I appreciate that, worked hard to make it this way
video length is 1911, nice
Awesomee
😂 That's cool
Nicholas ii wasn't Queen Victoria's grandson his wife was her granddaughter but he and George V were both grandchildren of Christian IX of Denmark.....
Great video and quality, better editing than before
I appreciate that, glad you find it more entertaining
@@rewriting-historybring back the ol' one.Its just feels like PowerPoint
@@rewriting-history thanks for being passive aggressive
Ngl The thumbnail goes hard 🔥🔥🔥
Appreciate that!
Fr
so true
Indeed it does. 👍
@@rewriting-history you were baking with this man.
The fact that the vid is 19:11 mins long lol
I tried hard to make it exactly this long lol
@@rewriting-history Well, it is a big success
@rewriting-history I honestly want to see WW2 of this alternate timeline!
it says 19:10 for me
6:44, That naval journey was one of the most hilarious stories that I have heard in a while😂😂😂
Oh yay, my idea came to fruition!
Blagodarya, Rewrite!
I appreciate the suggestion! You are very welcome!
My good man got his suggestion noticed.
Mad respect.
So Georgy, Willy and Nicky had a family reunion.
Words cannot describe how thankful I am that you made this video as this is one of my favorite possible routes in the HOI4 Great War mod
I am really glad that you liked it, more to come!
1:00 so when the british and russia ally in this scenario their territorial disputes are an issue but not for the entente?
The British joined the Entente because Belgium was invaded, so it's way different.
@@rewriting-history I'd suppose that's a fair way to put it then. An enemy of an enemy, thanks.
As a French, I am very scared
The worst thing to happen to France
I think you're only scared because you don't like being outcompeted by competent people.
Right before the Russian revolution, Nicholas asked if he could could escape to Britain. George basicly replied 'You'll be fine cuz'
More like the British parliament.
The crazy thing was, Russia was goated into war by France and seduced into it by Britain with Constantinople as a reward.
1:06 Bro says this Joke just After Possible History Uploaded a Vid about that. Actually such a Great Detail!
Lets gooo!
❌ 2 emperors ,1 king
✅ 3 emperors
Wilhelm and Nicholas were so close that they called each other Nicky and Willy.
RH, Russo-Japanese war happened because Russia was greedy for Korea, not because Russia wanted Manchurian lands. Russia wanted to partition Korea with Japan on top of getting all of Manchuria, and Japan took that as a huge insult and therefore fighting started soon after.
Funfact: if they had survived, Anastasia was planned to mary Edward VIII
This would be OP! Thank you AH❤
I hope you liked it! 😁
Yeah! We switched sides🎉
Austria trying not to collapse at every WW1 scenario: Impossible
Jets Goooo. Been waiting for this a long time. Love your content
I appreciate that, thank you very much!
This made me realize how ut was almost perfect for Romania in ww1
Yes, they like doubled in size
The previous videos were a lot smoother but it is a nice video anyway
Queen Victoria was the grandmother of George V, Wilhelm II, and Nicholas II.
Edit: not Nicholas'
Yes
Not true Nicholas wasn't a grandson of queen victoria, his wife was
Nicholas II wasn’t a grandson of Queen Victoria
You guys are right, Nicholas was only married to Victoria's granddaughter.
@@PeekasLukkala it was not he but his wife Alexandra who was a grandchild of Queen victoria. He was in no way related to her. Just search up his grandparents on google. His father was the son of Alexander II and Maria Alexandrovna of Hesse. His mother was a Danish princess the daughter of Christian IX and Louise of Hesse Kassel. He was related to George V because their mothers were sisters, Nicholas II and Wilhelm II were more distantly related.
18:08 IS WILD
🧔🏿♂️🧔🏿♂️🧔🏿♂️🧔🏿♂️🧔🏿♂️
🛋👱🏻♀️
lmaooo
5:43 The Rewriting History woke up a day and decided to roast us ☠️
And I will keep doing that!
But then Everyone's Favorite Painter wouldn't Rise
Yep, which is great
Imagine WW2 in this scenario real quick with a divided or united Cousins Alliance.
Gonna be real crazy
to get this to work, Wilhelm British Uncle must not hate Willy himself
1:04 amazing reference to Possible History’s new video haha
Good topic
I appreciate that!
This thumbnails keep getting better man
Appreciate that, will keep on improving!
Yay, I'm glad that you revisited the concept of alternate alliances in WWI. Another fun one would be Russia and Austro-Hungarian empire - Pretty likely considering that the empire was Russia's close ally for a long time, only to fall into political isolation thanks to not helping them in the Crimean war.
Awesome video dude, well done 👏
I appreciate that!
very realistic and very original i applaud your work good man from Bulgaria
I appreciate that, I tried my best!
The family reunions must be insane
Why do George V and Tsar Nicholas look so alike but Wilhelm has a completely different head shape? Was he adopted?!
George V and Tsar Nicholas were cousins through their mothers which were princesses from Denmark. while George V and Wilhelm was cousins through queen victoria. Tsar Nicholas and wilhelm were not cousins. So george and nicholas just got their mothers genes, maybe.
The Waluigi moustache is just far better
I love this Chanel so much
I appreciate that!
Yeah this alliance would lowkey be so OP, but would it last tho 🤔
I don't think it would last, they had so many disagreements, but they'd briefly work together
@@rewriting-history Yeah I agree, the different beliefs between them would kill the alliance.
Bro said this is unrealistic when he had Monaco unite all of France
Rewriting History video quality: 📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈
I appreciate that!
Will we get a sequal to this where we see the WW2?
Correction: Dreadnoughts are not super heavy battleships, they are all big gun battleships, which would become a redundant term later on, as all Battleships would be built with all big guns later on. (Note: There were exceptions to this rule, as there were some pre dreadnoughts that were finished after Dreadnought, some (Dantons) even laid down afterwards.)
I appreciate the correction!
LOVE YOUR CONTENT! THANKS FOR THIS ❤❤❤❤
You're welcome!
Why would Italy ally itself to Austria after Bosnia, if there was a country which was pissed off at the annexation of Bosnia it was Italy, mainly bc one of the terms of the triple alliance was that they couldn't expand in the balkans without consulting their allies first, but Austria didn't notify Italy, so Italy didn't ratify the triple alliance and started a mission in Vlore to exert influence in albania. It was specifically this the biggest reason Italy didn't join ww1 on the CP side, also otl they had to choose between trying to get Nice, Savoy, Corsica and a lot of colonies or Trento, Trieste and Dalmatia, here they don't even have to chose as all their enemies are allied, they are a natural ally of the cousins' alliance, it makes no sense for them to be allied to France and Austria
Because this was part of the deal. Austria gives italy it's claimed lands, while Italy supports Austria's claims on Bosnia
This is the most interesting what ifs
I appreciate that!
I really wanted a video like this, i think its really interesting
08:20 I dont have dementia you dont have to remind that again and again
Bro just read through the comments. Some people miss these warnings and insult me that I think it could have happened. I need to do them as I don't want people to know that I am for real
I once thought up this exact scenario in a history lesson in high school.
The audio says all german speaking areas go to germany but the map only shows modern austria and south tyrol going to germany
Yes I should have included the Sudetenland, my bad
British and German tensions Cooled in 1912, They actually might of made off with an alliance.
Russia on the other hand... uhh... maybe not.
FIRE VIDEOOOOOOO!!!!
I appreciate that!
YEEEES!!!!!!!!!!!!! THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!! LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I hope you liked it!
17:43 "France would lose some minor French colonies"
Picture:Literially all French possession in Africa is taken except for Algeria and empty land in the Sahara.
Yes, but they get to keep their Asian and American holdings
All of their African colonies were minor when compared to Algeria, tbh.
Idk I feel like it isn’t that far fetched for Britain and France to be hostile to each other considering they had only been friendly for like 50 years vs over 500 years of fighting. And Germany had fought a war with Austria recently as well.
I think the same too. Maybe I should have mentioned France in the video, saying that they are also rivals to Britain. I think that Napoleon III finally allied with the British, so after he is deposed and the Republic came to power, they continued that. Maybe Napoleon doesn't get captured at Sedan, but is still deposed and somebody else from the house of Bonaparte comes to charge, but with anti-British views
I'm very glad you did everything possible to form Greater Italy. Thank you, funny bulgarian man.
Glad you enjoyed it!
40k subs :p Good work
Appreciate that!
12:33 yoooo, morroco mentioned!
Although, france had already started occupying most of the country before 1911, at that point they were already at the doors of the capital, so yeah,
And even if the frensh back down, british loans to pay the spanish and german preferential treatment would probably cause even more revolts to erupt, requiring foreign intervention to quell them, ending up not independent anyways
I wrote an alternate history just like this while I was bored in my world history class, except Britain just kept up the rivalry with France and Prussia with Austria, leading Britain to ally with Germany and Austria to ally with France. Then Russia went to war with Austria when Franz Ferdinand was assassinated, France saw this as an attack against their ally so they joined the war, and Germany and Britain joined the war on Russia’s side to ensure that France and Austria do not become too powerful.
Nice video as always. Although I do think Italy would have joined the Cousins Alliance when the war starts instead of the near end.
I know, but then the Cousin Alliance would look like the clear winner, making people want to click off
I love watching the Bulgarian man with maps
I love your support, thank you!
Correction. Nicholas II was not a grandson of Queen Victoria. George V and Nicholas II were both grandsons of Christian IX of Denmark.
The thumbnail 🔥
Fireee
Good video, I have a proposal, what would have happened if Argentina had entered the Pacific War? Would it have influenced the malvinas War?
I think something similar could be possible, if Whillelm II's father, Kaiser Frederich III, who died 88 days after coronation, didn't smoke, he was a liberal, and wanted to reform Germany into a Constitutional monarchy like britain, Bismarck already was preparing for his reign, so Most likely he wouldn't be fired, With Both Frederich III and Bismarck seeking an Alliance with Britain, and If, like in the video, Edward VII dies earlier, An Alliance with Britain could be possible. As For Russia, if Alexander ii wasn't killed, he would have stablished a earlier duma, making russia a Constitutional monarchy like britain, again, and could improve relations. With Bismarck remaining and without Whillelm II, Bismarck could renew the Three Cousin Alliance or instead, Choosing/Aprooching an Alliance with Russia, like how they did with Áustria-Hungary, since they had similar regimes and their family ties
Wilhelm II loved his grandmother and used these familial ties to foster better relations between both countries.
As Germany helped the British in South Africa, the proximity could have been used to keep both countries close.
The proble is that Edward VII hated Wilhelm II with passion. He did everything he could to harm the British German relations, including pushing Britain closer to France.
Now, the Russo-French Entente was a thorn on the side of both Britain (Great Game) & Germany (European hegemony intentions).
People keep think RH has a bias on Bulgaria but he made Bulgaria lose
No matter what I cannot beat the aligations, so I am always screwed
@@rewriting-history fr
Hey rewriting history can you make a video on what if Carthage won the Punic wars?
What if britain failed to stop news of a freedom fighter (Netaji) in burma from reaching indian public in ww2 and the stationed indian army turned against the raj
Like what would be the consequences and what would it do to affect ww2
You should make a part 2
Nice vid only for the peace conference the sudetenland is primarily german at the time so it would probably be annexed by germaney too
Yep, a big mistake on my part
While Georg V was cousin to both Wilhelm II and Nicolas II (having common grand-parents with each), these to were a bit further away from each other - Nicolas' paternal great-great-grand-parents (Paul I and Sophie) were also great-great-grand-parents of Wilhelm II, plus Wilhelm II's paternal great-grand-parents (Friedrich Wilhelm III and Louise) were also great-great-grand-parents to Nicolas II. Though this double connection between the prussian and russian royal/imperial houses was already 2-3 generations old.
Edward II was actually even closer related to Wilhelm II than Georg V was (Uncle instead of Cousin), so at least the closer relations to Germany could easily have started before his death. With Georg V taking over, they would both take Russia into the boat.
If it did happen in real life (unlikely) then I want the alliance to be called “the 3 cousins alliance”
its weird that the video length is 19 minutes and 11 seconds?
Not weird, it took me a while to make it like that
Is your map based on HoI4? Because the more I watch your videos, the more I notice similarities between them, such as Britain being further away from mainland Europe, Ukraine's shape looking weird and Luxembourg not having a border with France if Germany owns Alsace-Lorraine. Just asking out of curiosity lol
Yes it's a hoi4 map
1:00 now we need video "what if Balkan formed 1 strong country"
I got an idea.
What if the proposal for the “United states of the Earth” Succeeds?
Basically,in 1893 someone proposed for the United States to change its name to the United States of the earth.
Because of the new states joining at the time,he thought the USA could expand until it controlled the whole world
can you make a video about if the habsburgs won the spanish war of succession? it wont be to unrealistic because the main reason the bourbons won (from what ive heard) is because france wouldnt give up when they were losing heavily and dragged out the war so long that the habsburg claiming the spanish throne ascended to emperor of the HRE after 2 emperors died and nobody wanted him to have that much power so they let the bourbons be in charge
so all that needs to change is france giving up or the 2 HRE emperors living longer
4:01 or would they 🤨🤨🤨🍕🇮🇹? **Vsauce music!!1!**
Haha I should have done that!
you should make another video about the clash/ww2
Britain, Germany and Russia forming an alliance? That would've been terrifying. In fact, that would've been the new central powers, but instead of Germany being the only one that is competent, both their allies are.
1:08 Possible History mentioned?!
No, but a really happy coincidence
Hey rw, can we get another series about the ussr winning the Cold War?
Next video would be kind of about that!
but why did italy side with france and austria-hungary? I mean they didn't even had a border with their enemies and they still held territorial claims on france
What if the USSR was dumb enough to betray the Allies before the bombs were dropped on Japan but after Germany surrendered?
Then German & Russian Empire would survived in long term today with British monarch
damn I really like this alternate timeline and it would so cool to have a ww2 with this video as base
whats the song in 9:54
Paused at 5:33 - Why do you need to eliminate Edward VII? Why not allow Victoria herself to propose the alliance, or even just allow Edward VII to see the benefits and pursue the alliance? True it would no longer technically be a cousins alliance but it would provide the same effect.
Exactly because it wouldn't be a cousin alliance, which is the narrative if the video
W video🔥🔥🔥
I appreciate that!
Did the Balkan reference come after the Possible History video by accident or on purpose?
100% accident lol
I feel like Italy would join the cousins alliance because they could have a easy victory with opportunities to expand into southern France Tunisia Austria Hungary and the Ottoman Empire
I agree here, but I wanted to make a more interesting video, because all of France, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire performed poorly in the Great War, so them being the only allies would make for a really boring video
make a alternative ww1 and ww2 simulation of this reality if possible
Nice vid