If you want to know what a plugin can (and cannot) do for you and how to use it, I recommend that you use the following prompt: What can the [plugin name] plugin do? Generate a 3-column table: 1st column lists every available function, 2nd column gives simple explanation, and 3rd column provide example prompts to illustrate plugin capacity.
What a great prompt, thank you! A sidenote but how weird is it that instead of developers writing up basic documentation, we now have to figure out how to query the software to tell us what it can be used for?
Hey Andy! I'm one of the builders behind ScholarAI, thanks for trying our plugin out. We hear you on the date bit; we previously did not have that as an enabled filter, but that should be coming next week. That network error is on OpenAI's end (the big fail label was pretty funny tho lol). When you have an open-access paper, ScholarAI gives you the full PDF URL which our plugin as well as other PDF parsers should be able to tell you details about. Would love to keep a dialogue going to see how we can make ScholarAI as useful as possible!
Hey. Also tried ScholarAI and wanted to ask, for non-open access papers are you able to at least scrape the titles, and abstracts? Tried a query recently and didn't get any results back from the closed journals, even though they exist.
It has only been a couple of months that developers have had access to building plugins. The one from Wolfram seems to be rock solid as do some others. I also suspect that academic sites (and others) are putting more counter measures in place to make it more difficult to scrape their content.
The plugins will improve, they're only beta now. Already the different plugins for chatting with PDFs or webpages are very useful! I'm using them regularly. But what I'm really looking for, and sure I hope I won't have to wait for too long, is "code interpreter". Based on other yt videos from those who had early access, that's a potential game changer.
Browsing is really broken... As far as I understand, it can't really cope with pages that have confusing layout, a lot of popups, ads and cookie notices... And especially if the webpage actively blocks unknown robots...
I also made a video about GPT-4 plugins and I can tell you that AskYourPDF also isn't very useful because of the limited context window of GPT-4 (about 8000 tokens). Even a PDF with only 10 pages is already too much. However, I found both VoxScript (to summarize RUclips videos via the transcript) and WebPilot (to summarize webpages) to be quite useful.
I don't think the current memory of gpt-4 is enough for that. Just querying a single webpage more than 3 times had gpt totally forget what it was doing and start randomly clicking around before failing.
My experience mirrors yours. It’s very much a beta experience at the mo. Reading PDFs works, but only up to a point. There seems to be a character limit after which it bails. Frustrating
You only got that error when you were looking for the latest papers from 2022 because you left the page whole it was still typing. You have to wait till it's finished or you won't get the rest of ChatGPT's response. Also, all you had to do after that was tell ChatGPT: I asked for papers from 2022 not 2012. And it would have corrected itself. So that fail was more on user side than the AI side.
Dr. Stapleton, why don't you write a paper on this your finding that ChatGPT, as presently configured or modeled, does not enhance research contrary to popular belief or thinking. I am quite upbeat it will be well received by the academic/research community. What thinketh thou?
Just a little too critical saying that it is disappointing and frustrating. Just using it to summarize papers, create a draft, or expand on writing alone is a valuable and a game changer...
i used chatgpt for help with my takehome econometrics hw and it was shit. There were many infos that im not sure was right or wrong i had to recheck the textbook several time. Got 23/30 on the quiz chatgpt is not very good in econometrics do self-study and get a mentor.
The plugins are still a bit buggy. They will die, and there is no way to recover. Also, chatGPT hasn't figured out that people need a search function to find the plugins they want to load.
![How To Write An Exceptional Literature Review With AI [NEXT LEVEL Tactics]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wz8lg_3j3Ok/mqdefault.jpg)
If you want to know what a plugin can (and cannot) do for you and how to use it, I recommend that you use the following prompt:
What can the [plugin name] plugin do? Generate a 3-column table: 1st column lists every available function, 2nd column gives simple explanation, and 3rd column provide example prompts to illustrate plugin capacity.
What a great prompt, thank you!
A sidenote but how weird is it that instead of developers writing up basic documentation, we now have to figure out how to query the software to tell us what it can be used for?
@@followthemoonrabbitI think they removed it from the plugin store. I checked and it's not there
Hey Andy! I'm one of the builders behind ScholarAI, thanks for trying our plugin out. We hear you on the date bit; we previously did not have that as an enabled filter, but that should be coming next week. That network error is on OpenAI's end (the big fail label was pretty funny tho lol). When you have an open-access paper, ScholarAI gives you the full PDF URL which our plugin as well as other PDF parsers should be able to tell you details about. Would love to keep a dialogue going to see how we can make ScholarAI as useful as possible!
Hey. Also tried ScholarAI and wanted to ask, for non-open access papers are you able to at least scrape the titles, and abstracts? Tried a query recently and didn't get any results back from the closed journals, even though they exist.
@@JIJICA100 at the moment we only show papers for which we can find an open-access publication, but are exploring ways to handle closed access.
@@lakshya.b You absolutely should not link into sci-hub... *cough cough*
@@lakshya.bany progress on this?
@@hervelegenvre9298 which part are you hoping to hear more about?
It has only been a couple of months that developers have had access to building plugins. The one from Wolfram seems to be rock solid as do some others. I also suspect that academic sites (and others) are putting more counter measures in place to make it more difficult to scrape their content.
The plugins will improve, they're only beta now. Already the different plugins for chatting with PDFs or webpages are very useful! I'm using them regularly. But what I'm really looking for, and sure I hope I won't have to wait for too long, is "code interpreter". Based on other yt videos from those who had early access, that's a potential game changer.
Yes Code Interpreter seems like the real deal. Can't wait.
wow, this guy is so thorough in including the details in the description. Excellent.
Browsing is really broken... As far as I understand, it can't really cope with pages that have confusing layout, a lot of popups, ads and cookie notices... And especially if the webpage actively blocks unknown robots...
I also made a video about GPT-4 plugins and I can tell you that AskYourPDF also isn't very useful because of the limited context window of GPT-4 (about 8000 tokens). Even a PDF with only 10 pages is already too much. However, I found both VoxScript (to summarize RUclips videos via the transcript) and WebPilot (to summarize webpages) to be quite useful.
You have no idea how much your videos are helpful for me, keep going man, that's great
The first paper it suggested (from "scientific research") appears to be from a predatory journal😂
You edified my solidarity from -Microsoft- OpenAI. Thank you. You saved me potentially gobs of time. In gratitude.
Great video, thanks for your work! One question on "Chat with PDF": Is it possible to link and chat with several PDF simultaneously?
I don't think the current memory of gpt-4 is enough for that. Just querying a single webpage more than 3 times had gpt totally forget what it was doing and start randomly clicking around before failing.
@@followthemoonrabbit 🙏
How can I add drawing code to an algorithm with
شكراً جزيلا لك
انت تساعدني كثيرآ، و تزيل الكثير من الصعوبات التي اوجهها .
مثل شو الصعوبات اللي زالها؟
My experience mirrors yours. It’s very much a beta experience at the mo. Reading PDFs works, but only up to a point. There seems to be a character limit after which it bails. Frustrating
You only got that error when you were looking for the latest papers from 2022 because you left the page whole it was still typing. You have to wait till it's finished or you won't get the rest of ChatGPT's response.
Also, all you had to do after that was tell ChatGPT: I asked for papers from 2022 not 2012. And it would have corrected itself. So that fail was more on user side than the AI side.
Dr. Stapleton, why don't you write a paper on this your finding that ChatGPT, as presently configured or modeled, does not enhance research contrary to popular belief or thinking. I am quite upbeat it will be well received by the academic/research community. What thinketh thou?
Dear Brother Andy can you please make a video about Scispace ?
Hello, is it possible for chatgpt to create and send a tiktok list of videos that are going viral at the moment?
I cant find plug ins in chatGTP 4
Just a little too critical saying that it is disappointing and frustrating. Just using it to summarize papers, create a draft, or expand on writing alone is a valuable and a game changer...
bro you made me laugh out loud by your way of explaining, but u really helped for Choosing the right plugins
Wtf, one beta feature did not work as YOU expected and that implies "AI not useful anymore in research?" WTF is that logic??
Jason Galaxy got a lot slimmer lately!
Access to journals a barrier?
i used chatgpt for help with my takehome econometrics hw and it was shit. There were many infos that im not sure was right or wrong i had to recheck the textbook several time. Got 23/30 on the quiz chatgpt is not very good in econometrics do self-study and get a mentor.
Guys, I really need a chatgpt 4 account. It's hard to activate in Afghanistan
The plugins are still a bit buggy. They will die, and there is no way to recover. Also, chatGPT hasn't figured out that people need a search function to find the plugins they want to load.
Here 1 minute in, let's go!
Chatgpt is way over rated. I guess people love the latest fad though
Bing is better. GPT-4 and plug-ins and pretty bad at research
Yup horrible it was indeed
Thouh itcan not find papers, that exist, it also can find and even quote papers that do not! ))) SiFiGPT by now! ))
Chatgpt is a secret astrologer. It can see the future😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The plugins dont work, so it is not worth paying for them.