I have been saying this my whole life, Mexicans who have more indigenous features look Asian no joke, as well as South Americans and native northern Americans.
@@margaritanavarrete1246 that was after the colonization of many native lands. South Americans have dark skin but no black features. Natives of the Americas have always looked Asian even before colonization.
Yo you guys are really hitting your stride now! I feel like JK is just on another level of funny now 😂 ever since they started bringing more comics on!
Nothing new . We knew this for centuries South East Asians are our far cousins. Not only that our teeth are shovel shaped too. PS we invented the barbecue. The word barbecue comes from the Arawak word barbacoa. The world has to thank the Arawak nation for that.
Humans are all related to each other in at least some compacity. I'm of Indigenous descent (ancestors from pre-Columbian Mexico) and sometimes but not all the time, people think I'm at least half-Asian because of, according to them, my eye shape. Some people have asked me if I'm at least half-Chinese or maybe Filipino cause of my skin tone, even my Filipina friend asked me lol. I was even called "Chino" (in a rather unflattering tone) a couple of times because of my "eye-smile".
Modern chinese are different. South chinese are cantonese. The northern are some chinesified mix of manchurian, mongolian people and other nomads. And the central guys are the real han. Also they're some other people like tibetians, uyghurs, etc. Native Americans from both Americas and eskimo/inuit people all came from Siberia by different waves.
@@sheddy22 in my opinion meso American is still a relevant term but it doesn’t make sense to say they spanned a whole continent because the word only refers to natives from modern day central Mexico down to modern day Costa Rica. It doesn’t include natives north and south of that region But I agree with you that the word does give off social studies class in school vibes lol
I did my ancestry DNA and had no Asian or African DNA...does this mean the DNA is so far back? I'm indigenous Americas North and South and a small percentage of Yucatan. Some European countries on my mom's side.
I think all Caribbean ppl do the same thing that Cris was talking about. Whenever you see another person of your Caribbean culture, you gravitate towards them. I am not sure about the younger generation after myself, as I don't travel anymore. But when I was growing up and went to different foreign places with family and saw anyone remotely looking like they come from my island, well my countrymen, I would get excited "What waan". Or nod and say "Blessings." Knew alot of people who would openly wear the pride of the country on the streets, just walking etc. Especially when holiday time on the island and you go to the foreign country, then you see them glistened in island colours. Thanks for reading the long paragraph.
Some of the people in China their ethnic clothing reminds me of Pueblo people from the American southwest. I don't know why. China has 56 ethnic groups.
It’s also very funny listening to banana talking about Asian history like the know anything. You know what the white people tell you but not straight from the source. Tibet was conquered by the Qing dynasty in the 1700s, that’s where the claim came from. It’s been a part of the Chinese empire as long as America existed. You’ll question why China “deserves” to have Tibet but never question why America has the right in the first place to occupy native land. Colonized mindset of ABCs. And Joe being Japanese should know that Japan colonized Hokkaido from the Ainu people and colonized Okinawa only in the 1800s. Japan is occupying lands of non Japanese people as well, should these Ainu and Okinawa natives not have independence as well? I’m not sure why Bananas just buy whatever BS the western media tells them and just give a free pass and never question the bs that western countries have done and are still doing. Why do you want to willingly weaken your people while handing more control to your colonizers?
I kind of think it's because they have a Dalai Lama who is/was well known enough to be regarded as the country's ruling figure/figurehead in recent memory. Hokkaido, Okinawa, & the Native Americans have no such central figure or if they did/do, none of them have the same fame & acclaim. These places & people are globally "perceived" to be part of their respective countries. While comparing actions by the centuries they were done in seems fair, the thing is that time is relative & is altered by perception (accordingly), probably in the same way that not all civilizations went through the bronze & iron age at the same time. Some nations (like some Asian & African ones) haven't or are just about to enter their industrial age. So China taking over Tibet, among other places, is a bit late then when considering that places like Tibet & Taiwan spent their time somewhat wisely establishing theirselves as a separate nation in the eyes of many with a central figure/figurehead/government that actually interacted with other modern nations right in time for the Global Information era & in time to reach the eyes & ears of people who are part of the later(?) stages of the Information era―the Internet age. What's funny is China hoping for an extension of the Colonial period like some dude hoping to cut in queue. Like they didn't discover paper & gunpowder 1st...but dropped the ball on world domination.
@@twentyfifthjt7888 Tibet was colonized by the Qing dynasty in the 1700s, it’s as long as America has been a country. Taiwan was colonized in the Ming dynasty in the 1600s. You have to consider where your global perceptions came from. The same people that try to delegitimize China’s claim also write the history books that legitimize the genocide and their colonization of lands that did not belong to them. If you’re talking a about time makes everything okay, Japan and America only colonized Okinawa and Hawaii in the 1800s respectively. Their history is much shorter than China’s history in either Tibet or Taiwan. Ask yourself why doesn’t the Okinawans or native Americans have a centralized figure for their cause? They went through years of systematic oppression where strong leaders were removed and their culture diluted. They genocided these people both physically and culturally, funny that’s the go to accusation America has for other countries when it’s still going on with their natives today. I’m not sure if you want to justify the legitimacy of Japan and American’s colonization because they were more thorough with their cultural genocide.
@@MarkMiller304 @Mark Miller No, I'm not saying time makes everything all right. I'm saying that everyone's wrong anyway. Also, it's BS media in general not just western media... even the ones that try not to be BS will fail eventually; it's a human fault, a pass-the-message game that will follow Murphy's law.. the fact that it's western-centric is a build-up of wills and conincidences or a lack thereof of other entities. However, China is wrong at the wrong time (as opposed to USA & Japan being wrong at the right time)... and it's somewhat their fault since they let other nations write the global history books, when they themselves invented the paper these were printed on. Whether they lacked the will & coincidences to be the history writers, it's all the same. What isn't the same though is that the Dalai Lama exists at present (whether by his merit or by some entities' fault of favor)... & everyone knows about him.
@@twentyfifthjt7888 wrong at the wrong time is correct to a certain extent. When Japan and America started their journey of colonization they were at a time when it was the norm and they were too powerful to be opposed. When China colonized Tibet in the 1700 that was height of the Chinese empire at the time, so colonizing at the wrong time wasn’t the issue. It was failing at the wrong time that’s the cause of China’s issue that persist till today. During the 1800s China suffered rapid decline due to internal corruption and then other colonial powers took advantage. China suffered decades of civil wars and western powers particularly Britain wanted to expand their empire into Chinese territories, that’s where the issue of Tibet began. The British wanted to carve Tibet into the British Raj and started to prop up People like the Dali lama as an opposing force. This is the origins of why the Dali lama is so prominent in the west today. If China didn’t fall into civil war and have western powers try to carve it up at the turn of the century we wouldn’t be having this conversation right now. Modern Chinese would never let this imperial Anglo project succeed on them knowing the history of what happened. You’d be a real punk b!tch to know that the west has been trying to mess with you all these years and you just bend over and take it. If there is still a man with balls running the country they will not let that happen. What history has shown is might make right and the victors write history, and if you have a chance to fight for the interest of your own nation and you don’t take it, you’re a fool and doomed to having someone else write your history.
I'm Alaskan native and I get mixed up with a bunch of different Asians. Korean and Japanese is what people assume I am a lot but sometimes people just start talking to me in Tagalog and I'm like "..... Sorry? but I'm Native."
@@civilwarguy4740 Counting numbers is common sense. So did you know how to count before you started school? Being slow and not knowing doesn't equate to being the same. 🤦♂️ I simply didn't know.
Damn that's when you know the corporate media fucked you up mentally. Lol. "This isn't news. These are facts." Thought the news were supposed to state nothing but facts.
@@kingcelebate1242 everything in the news should be factual. People watch the news to get their know how in the world today. All these news with entertainment came out, because they know it captures the audience, but the actual news was supposed to state facts. Old news, new news is still news.
No, they were not facts. Native Americans coming from China is just a prevailing theory. There's no way to prove it as fact unless they built a time machine. Even with the information gathered from this particular research using Fossils genomes does not make it fact. It only supports the conclusion, not proved as a fact that they came from China.
Read about Ydna K2, it’ll will explain a lot about how each tribe originated in Eurasia. Ydna NOP originated in Southeast Asia or southern China. Haplogroups NO become modern East Asians (O) and Siberian natives (N) and Haplogroup P became Q and R the ancestors of indo Europeans (R) and native Americans (O). All these haplogroups NOP were Asian cousins at some point in history. The split happen greater than 20000 years ago so its kind of pointless attributing a modern culture to these people since China as a culture didn’t even emerge until 5000 years ago. They were just prehistoric Asian ancestors that spread out to all of Eurasia and the Americas.
This makes more sense to me. I'm Paiute and White and I did ancestry DNA. The whole state of Nevada is grouped in with "Indigenous Americas Mexico" and I have a little "Indigenous Americas North" and some Yucatan where the Mayan ruins are. No Asian DNA whatsoever unless it's way back there.
I like jk but goddamn joe, stop giving that sorry excuse that youre comedians thats why you dont know a lot, but damn it doesnt mean that you have to be stupid
The original Asians aren’t mongoloids. The native Americans who look Asian are Mongolian from a later era. If American Indians were Chinese, they would still look Chinese from North America to south, they don’t
I think they kind of do. They are just tanner Asians. They look more south East Asian instead of northern East Asian. Of course with time their features changed due to adapting to their environment. The ones from what is now USA were taller due to climate, the ones in central and South America are shorter and darker due to the climate there
Native Americans generally have significant European ancestry due to post-Columbian introduction of individuals of European descent. The more secluded groups look pretty Asian.
pureblooded native americans 100% look asian. have you looked up pictures of tibetan khampas? modern day chinese are a mix of tibetan + austronesian which is why the language family is called sino-tibetan. it's not even about looks but the great plains native americans have a lot of similarities in culture with nomadic asians including similarities in language as well. it's the original indo europeans that don't look like caucasoids. they found remains of men who are paternal haplogroup p and q both have asian bone structure. i think most likely that modern r1a and r1b haplogroups are fathered by asian looking men who mixed with proto indo european women resulting in modern day europeans.
Lmao when bart mentioned all the casinos, i live right in the middle of all the casinos. Morongo, saboba, pechanga, and san manuel. Shit Chinese peeps better get those native money then
The Native Americans that we are all familiar with are what you call a 5 dollar Indian. To my knowledge, they are Caucasoid Mongoloid mix. The 1st peoples of America that Columbus and nem found when they came here are the ancestors of the so-called black people.
Does india not claim lands taken by the British Raj? India as we know it today is only a country because of the British. Most country’s boarders in Africa were created by colonial powers and do not fall on traditional ethnic boundaries, should those countries be reorganized by traditional ethnic boundaries? Unlike the colonial powers in Africa that remained separate entities, the Manchu completely assimilated into the larger Chinese society, they were largely responsible for the concept of the modern multiethnic Chinese nation in the first place, you’ll hardly find a pure blooded Manchu that can speak Manchu. You’ll find in European history as well that England was ruled by French kings, did they stop being England because of that?
I have been saying this my whole life, Mexicans who have more indigenous features look Asian no joke, as well as South Americans and native northern Americans.
We do but we also look black
@@margaritanavarrete1246 that was after the colonization of many native lands. South Americans have dark skin but no black features. Natives of the Americas have always looked Asian even before colonization.
tenoch Huerta does not look Asian
@@NDN451 because he has more Spanish features clearly… did you not read what I wrote or are you helping me?
This is really good. First time ever heard this show. Love your energy!
Yo you guys are really hitting your stride now! I feel like JK is just on another level of funny now 😂 ever since they started bringing more comics on!
Nah, to be honest, they’ve always been this funny 😂
Doesn’t this mean that Geo is part chinese since she’s part native (Mexican indigenous)? That makes taika way more Asian than just 50%
bart and geo did and DNA test and it said she was 70% European
@@omsonmn_inde6978 30% is still a lot
When push comes to shove Koreans will come together like Voltron. Just think of the LA Riots.
Nothing new . We knew this for centuries South East Asians are our far cousins. Not only that our teeth are shovel shaped too. PS we invented the barbecue. The word barbecue comes from the Arawak word barbacoa. The world has to thank the Arawak nation for that.
Humans are all related to each other in at least some compacity. I'm of Indigenous descent (ancestors from pre-Columbian Mexico) and sometimes but not all the time, people think I'm at least half-Asian because of, according to them, my eye shape. Some people have asked me if I'm at least half-Chinese or maybe Filipino cause of my skin tone, even my Filipina friend asked me lol. I was even called "Chino" (in a rather unflattering tone) a couple of times because of my "eye-smile".
ive been binging your channel for two weeks you cant upload fast enough for me to have smth to watch
Modern chinese are different. South chinese are cantonese. The northern are some chinesified mix of manchurian, mongolian people and other nomads. And the central guys are the real han. Also they're some other people like tibetians, uyghurs, etc.
Native Americans from both Americas and eskimo/inuit people all came from Siberia by different waves.
The Koreans are the original settlers 😂
There were so many different meso Americans that spanned across the entire continent. That’s like saying Chinese for every Asian
They all came from Asia nonetheless
That’s kind of what you’re doing by saying “meso-Americans” were spread across the continent
@@civilwarguy4740 bro said meso american in 2022
@@sheddy22 in my opinion meso American is still a relevant term but it doesn’t make sense to say they spanned a whole continent because the word only refers to natives from modern day central Mexico down to modern day Costa Rica. It doesn’t include natives north and south of that region
But I agree with you that the word does give off social studies class in school vibes lol
I did my ancestry DNA and had no Asian or African DNA...does this mean the DNA is so far back? I'm indigenous Americas North and South and a small percentage of Yucatan. Some European countries on my mom's side.
Ancestry tests are still largely unreliable, some more than others but yeah
They can only trace the DNA so far back
Yeah I think we'd have our own markers by now.
Thanks for always keeping Hawai'i on the map, someone always wearing a Hawaiian shirt. Keep that Asian/Pacific Islander pride! 💯 🤙
What were said was much Needed 😁 Thank you Bro’s!
You guys are so funny. I love you guys. jk news has always been number 1 for me. I stopped watching CNN and Fox and I always get my news from you. 😹😹😹
I think all Caribbean ppl do the same thing that Cris was talking about. Whenever you see another person of your Caribbean culture, you gravitate towards them. I am not sure about the younger generation after myself, as I don't travel anymore. But when I was growing up and went to different foreign places with family and saw anyone remotely looking like they come from my island, well my countrymen, I would get excited "What waan". Or nod and say "Blessings." Knew alot of people who would openly wear the pride of the country on the streets, just walking etc. Especially when holiday time on the island and you go to the foreign country, then you see them glistened in island colours.
Thanks for reading the long paragraph.
"so you just eat bananas for both reason" yo that was uneccesarily funny tho
just eat bananas for no reason 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Imagine if screens were triangles LOL 😂
dose no one remember Pangea???? we all came some the same shit hole that lead to this world
Where did you get the emoji
@@_OrthodoxChurch09 when you comment it the little smile thing found it under youtube option.
The Philippines was at their peak when they were apart of the Spanish Empire
Some of the people in China their ethnic clothing reminds me of Pueblo people from the American southwest. I don't know why. China has 56 ethnic groups.
Everyone: ...
Sosa: "You know what I mean"
It’s also very funny listening to banana talking about Asian history like the know anything. You know what the white people tell you but not straight from the source. Tibet was conquered by the Qing dynasty in the 1700s, that’s where the claim came from. It’s been a part of the Chinese empire as long as America existed. You’ll question why China “deserves” to have Tibet but never question why America has the right in the first place to occupy native land. Colonized mindset of ABCs. And Joe being Japanese should know that Japan colonized Hokkaido from the Ainu people and colonized Okinawa only in the 1800s. Japan is occupying lands of non Japanese people as well, should these Ainu and Okinawa natives not have independence as well? I’m not sure why Bananas just buy whatever BS the western media tells them and just give a free pass and never question the bs that western countries have done and are still doing. Why do you want to willingly weaken your people while handing more control to your colonizers?
I kind of think it's because they have a Dalai Lama who is/was well known enough to be regarded as the country's ruling figure/figurehead in recent memory.
Hokkaido, Okinawa, & the Native Americans have no such central figure or if they did/do, none of them have the same fame & acclaim. These places & people are globally "perceived" to be part of their respective countries. While comparing actions by the centuries they were done in seems fair, the thing is that time is relative & is altered by perception (accordingly), probably in the same way that not all civilizations went through the bronze & iron age at the same time. Some nations (like some Asian & African ones) haven't or are just about to enter their industrial age.
So China taking over Tibet, among other places, is a bit late then when considering that places like Tibet & Taiwan spent their time somewhat wisely establishing theirselves as a separate nation in the eyes of many with a central figure/figurehead/government that actually interacted with other modern nations right in time for the Global Information era & in time to reach the eyes & ears of people who are part of the later(?) stages of the Information era―the Internet age.
What's funny is China hoping for an extension of the Colonial period like some dude hoping to cut in queue. Like they didn't discover paper & gunpowder 1st...but dropped the ball on world domination.
@@twentyfifthjt7888 Tibet was colonized by the Qing dynasty in the 1700s, it’s as long as America has been a country. Taiwan was colonized in the Ming dynasty in the 1600s. You have to consider where your global perceptions came from. The same people that try to delegitimize China’s claim also write the history books that legitimize the genocide and their colonization of lands that did not belong to them. If you’re talking a about time makes everything okay, Japan and America only colonized Okinawa and Hawaii in the 1800s respectively. Their history is much shorter than China’s history in either Tibet or Taiwan. Ask yourself why doesn’t the Okinawans or native Americans have a centralized figure for their cause? They went through years of systematic oppression where strong leaders were removed and their culture diluted. They genocided these people both physically and culturally, funny that’s the go to accusation America has for other countries when it’s still going on with their natives today. I’m not sure if you want to justify the legitimacy of Japan and American’s colonization because they were more thorough with their cultural genocide.
@@MarkMiller304 @Mark Miller No, I'm not saying time makes everything all right. I'm saying that everyone's wrong anyway. Also, it's BS media in general not just western media... even the ones that try not to be BS will fail eventually; it's a human fault, a pass-the-message game that will follow Murphy's law.. the fact that it's western-centric is a build-up of wills and conincidences or a lack thereof of other entities.
However, China is wrong at the wrong time (as opposed to USA & Japan being wrong at the right time)... and it's somewhat their fault since they let other nations write the global history books, when they themselves invented the paper these were printed on. Whether they lacked the will & coincidences to be the history writers, it's all the same.
What isn't the same though is that the Dalai Lama exists at present (whether by his merit or by some entities' fault of favor)... & everyone knows about him.
@@twentyfifthjt7888 wrong at the wrong time is correct to a certain extent. When Japan and America started their journey of colonization they were at a time when it was the norm and they were too powerful to be opposed. When China colonized Tibet in the 1700 that was height of the Chinese empire at the time, so colonizing at the wrong time wasn’t the issue. It was failing at the wrong time that’s the cause of China’s issue that persist till today. During the 1800s China suffered rapid decline due to internal corruption and then other colonial powers took advantage. China suffered decades of civil wars and western powers particularly Britain wanted to expand their empire into Chinese territories, that’s where the issue of Tibet began. The British wanted to carve Tibet into the British Raj and started to prop up People like the Dali lama as an opposing force. This is the origins of why the Dali lama is so prominent in the west today. If China didn’t fall into civil war and have western powers try to carve it up at the turn of the century we wouldn’t be having this conversation right now. Modern Chinese would never let this imperial Anglo project succeed on them knowing the history of what happened. You’d be a real punk b!tch to know that the west has been trying to mess with you all these years and you just bend over and take it. If there is still a man with balls running the country they will not let that happen. What history has shown is might make right and the victors write history, and if you have a chance to fight for the interest of your own nation and you don’t take it, you’re a fool and doomed to having someone else write your history.
Gonna build some Casinos in China too. 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂
I'm Alaskan native and I get mixed up with a bunch of different Asians.
Korean and Japanese is what people assume I am a lot but sometimes people just start talking to me in Tagalog and I'm like "..... Sorry? but I'm Native."
In Alaska we joke and call Asians Cousins
@Jurk844 Exactly, I was going to say something similar. They know this and try to act like they don't know. They think we don't know!
This has been known for YEARS!! Ive known this for like 6 years already
yah you know for 6 years but not everyone knows about this cause they are worried about their problems.
Koreans are the best asians, learned that from the Korean History Channel hosted by Park Ing and Park Yu lmao!
I thought this was common knowledge at this point
Common knowledge to you. I didn't know that.
@@MyLife-og2kr you being slow doesn’t mean it isn’t common knowledge
@@civilwarguy4740 Counting numbers is common sense. So did you know how to count before you started school? Being slow and not knowing doesn't equate to being the same. 🤦♂️ I simply didn't know.
@@MyLife-og2kr common knowledge isn’t the same as common sense
@@MyLife-og2kr i was taught this in 4th grade fs
Something about joe being intelligent asf as well as holding an axe still gets me 😂
This isn't news. These are facts.
Damn that's when you know the corporate media fucked you up mentally. Lol. "This isn't news. These are facts." Thought the news were supposed to state nothing but facts.
@@MyLife-og2kr Not everything in the news is factual. And this information is old. I hope I've been able to enlighten you.
@@kingcelebate1242 everything in the news should be factual. People watch the news to get their know how in the world today. All these news with entertainment came out, because they know it captures the audience, but the actual news was supposed to state facts. Old news, new news is still news.
No, they were not facts. Native Americans coming from China is just a prevailing theory. There's no way to prove it as fact unless they built a time machine. Even with the information gathered from this particular research using Fossils genomes does not make it fact. It only supports the conclusion, not proved as a fact that they came from China.
@@maplenerd22 dna
Everyone is earthlings
eats bananas for no reason
Read about Ydna K2, it’ll will explain a lot about how each tribe originated in Eurasia. Ydna NOP originated in Southeast Asia or southern China. Haplogroups NO become modern East Asians (O) and Siberian natives (N) and Haplogroup P became Q and R the ancestors of indo Europeans (R) and native Americans (O). All these haplogroups NOP were Asian cousins at some point in history. The split happen greater than 20000 years ago so its kind of pointless attributing a modern culture to these people since China as a culture didn’t even emerge until 5000 years ago. They were just prehistoric Asian ancestors that spread out to all of Eurasia and the Americas.
i though native american came from the south like incas or mayan, bec their much closer than china
This makes more sense to me. I'm Paiute and White and I did ancestry DNA. The whole state of Nevada is grouped in with "Indigenous Americas Mexico" and I have a little "Indigenous Americas North" and some Yucatan where the Mayan ruins are. No Asian DNA whatsoever unless it's way back there.
It’s pronounced “Die-ass-per-rah”
Amerindians were from China too but maybe other groups of indigenous not Han
I like jk but goddamn joe, stop giving that sorry excuse that youre comedians thats why you dont know a lot, but damn it doesnt mean that you have to be stupid
Bering Straight FKA Bering Land bridge
Duh
Ah so desert asian makes sense
They already done it🤣
They are called plantanes
Wow didn’t you guys learn this in grade school? Americans… 👀
I drive a korean car 😂 kia sorrento baby 🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽
Well, they definitely didn't come from Africa.
Shit I’m already here in America
Didnt you pay attention in school !?!?!?
There is A LOT of similarities in Asian languages and mesoamerican languages, this isn't surprising to me at all.
Aztecs, Mayans, Inca all from Asia.
Even down to their writing systems. Mesoamericans wrote in a logographic form as the Chinese do.
Maybe Latins will stop claiming to be Native when they are really Spanish.
What similarities? Have you ever heard a native American language? And no 🤣 theirs no damn kanji anything with Natives. You're grasping at straws
@@whatzittooya8976What tribe?
I’m Chinese!?
Everyone should know about Pangaea by now. So. it's not surprising, I mean everything was once connected.
i mean if you tell a child now a days they probably won't know this
Mongolia
The original Asians aren’t mongoloids. The native Americans who look Asian are Mongolian from a later era. If American Indians were Chinese, they would still look Chinese from North America to south, they don’t
I think they kind of do. They are just tanner Asians. They look more south East Asian instead of northern East Asian. Of course with time their features changed due to adapting to their environment. The ones from what is now USA were taller due to climate, the ones in central and South America are shorter and darker due to the climate there
Native Americans generally have significant European ancestry due to post-Columbian introduction of individuals of European descent. The more secluded groups look pretty Asian.
They look more like my family. My grandparents came from Southern China in the middle of nowhere in the desert.
pureblooded native americans 100% look asian. have you looked up pictures of tibetan khampas? modern day chinese are a mix of tibetan + austronesian which is why the language family is called sino-tibetan. it's not even about looks but the great plains native americans have a lot of similarities in culture with nomadic asians including similarities in language as well.
it's the original indo europeans that don't look like caucasoids. they found remains of men who are paternal haplogroup p and q both have asian bone structure. i think most likely that modern r1a and r1b haplogroups are fathered by asian looking men who mixed with proto indo european women resulting in modern day europeans.
@@r6guy Eastern European all have an “Asian” touch. They have rounder faces and “softer” features compared to Northern Europeans.
Nope 🤣
:D
Lmao when bart mentioned all the casinos, i live right in the middle of all the casinos. Morongo, saboba, pechanga, and san manuel. Shit Chinese peeps better get those native money then
This is old news…. This is something we learned in middle school into high school…
Bro when he took out that Puerto Rican flag 🇵🇷 I took mine out. I’m crying it was so accurate lol.
The Native Americans that we are all familiar with are what you call a 5 dollar Indian. To my knowledge, they are Caucasoid Mongoloid mix.
The 1st peoples of America that Columbus and nem found when they came here are the ancestors of the so-called black people.
That would mean the atlantic slave trade was a fairy tale🤣
It's so weird how they hated Mongols and Manchus throughout their history. But also half-ass claim and not claim foreign dynasties as their own.
Does india not claim lands taken by the British Raj? India as we know it today is only a country because of the British. Most country’s boarders in Africa were created by colonial powers and do not fall on traditional ethnic boundaries, should those countries be reorganized by traditional ethnic boundaries? Unlike the colonial powers in Africa that remained separate entities, the Manchu completely assimilated into the larger Chinese society, they were largely responsible for the concept of the modern multiethnic Chinese nation in the first place, you’ll hardly find a pure blooded Manchu that can speak Manchu. You’ll find in European history as well that England was ruled by French kings, did they stop being England because of that?
Sounds like alot of money is getting wasted on science, cuz I could of figured this out.
oh dear. the dumb.
Ayye