He plays with the most tender and utterly poignant passion. And most of all, Horowitz is not afraid of this difficult and very complex work. His interpretation is absolutely unique and comes from the heart.
@@organman52 that's deep bro no need to be so upset that your'e not as sucessful as him you trashyalk a 80+yo man, we'll talk about that when you reach that age.
I really like it too especially with the bright bass he’s got on his piano, I like the extra punch and I miss it when it’s not there lol. He does it rach 3 and his 2nd sonata in a few places too
I listen to other younger pianists playing this...but for me, the weight of age is necessary to interpret this the way it is meant. Yes, I know Chopin died young, but the emotion needed...has to be borne of experience. With it equal measures of failure and success. I listen to this, it's like a song of my life. Anyone's life. Pain, stride, acceptance. I love you Freideric for what you left for us. And blessings to Mr Horrowitz....for his interpretation, his life force and giving my ears joy.
Statements like this outline the problem I proposed in my video segment on Music. A commenter with no system of understanding performance, with no way of scientifically describing that they were hypnotized… by a bad performance: because it was an intuitive story regardless of the Information being all wrong: besides in many ways being a perfectly “surmountable” performance. Notice your use of the word surmountable, and how it gives away your agreement that music is too a competition. The music might not be surmountable in the sense that it was unique: because it was overly intuitive, overly in the moment in regards to the decision making being made: not prepared or artistic in its presentation. *then you have fools in the responses to the comment calling others “toxic” for daring to point out the blatant reality of the notes being wrong! Of the performance in many ways being unsatisfactory, especially to people who have heard these things too long.* What a confused weird crowd the modern listeners are.
He plays a bunch of wrong notes yet in some ways they enhance the performance. Horowitz is able to make any combination of notes work with beautiful elegance
He could name the entire piece, which, objectively, is full of wrong notes, phrases, time stretching, and so on, but Horowitz's expressivity in a way or another balances these factors, enchanting the public more during a live performance than in a video on RUclips. For instance, Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli's recording is technically better, with the same expression as Horiwitz had, too. Maybe Horowitz follows only the first two pages of the sheet music, but the rest is as expressive as wrong, "perfectly balanced, as all things should be"
Yeah, Horowitz didn't subscribe to the view that everything should be played exactly as written. Some people criticize him for that but personally, I think it depends on the result. Horowitz was an amazing musician who had a feel for the music he played, his performances are almost always convincing, often utterly divine. This performance however is odd, I think he exaggerated a bit, some of his phrasing (which is usually impeccable) is a bit questionable, at least in my view.
For me it’s the piece as a whole (not the individual notes or passages) that determines how effective the performance was. The player needs to keep a certain flow throughout the piece to portray a piece well. If the individual passages and parts of a piece are flawless, but the artist fails to connect them properly, or fails to keep the playing style and quality homogeneous, the piece will lose part of, if not all of its meaning. At least that is my opinion.
Though I play guitar, I can tell Horowitz's hand movement is so efficient and minimal! From a distance, you can't even see his fingers move! Truly an example for new and old players of all instruments.
So glad I got to hear him play this work he was always famous for. It was 6 years before this recital and on the West Coast (California). He gave two performances a week apart, the first one ended the printed program with this First Ballade and the following week he ended with Scriabin's 5th Sonata! Both recitals also contained the "Concerto Without Orchestra" by Schumann - his 3rd Sonata.
These are now available on Spotify. Horowitz in the 70s was out of the world. I consider both the Ballade and the Sonata 5 in that series of recitals to be one of the top performances for the respective works. Unfortunatetly, here in 1982, Horowitz's mental illness and addiction prevents him from playing as superbly as before (it is still fantastic, but not the best H. could've done). It is a fortune that he took a few years off before returning in the mid 80s.
eenayeah to my knowledge he had his pianos specially tuned & action. To achieve forte on this piano is easy, the trick is to be able to achieve any of other dynamic. That’s why he can just sit there and barely move and achieve fortissimo. It’s incredible that he’s able to control the dynamics on a piano with this type of action. He had a special touch
@@Emma-ob5oj There is the fortissimo of the maestro Horowitz and there's the brash banging of the 88's by too many other pianists. Never mind the way that the action of this Steinway D was set. I had the fortune to play a few notes on this same piano - I'm not a pianist, I'm a wood finisher. My son played Carnival on this piano and also a Debussy piece, he's a pianist. Anyway, back to my point,, which is the ability or inability of a pianist to exercise control from the softest to the loudest notes, even when banging your forearm on the keys during a Berios piece.
Watching this Master, it amases me everytime how Horowitz manages his sound, that unique upload of differential levels of expressions and, above all, his capacity of interpretation - often resulted from the "response" of quiet listeners below stage - ... Thanks for posting this tresure of version "
Ni en un millón de años puede nacer otro ser humano que haga esto con el piano ni con ningún instrumento. Es un gigante, un dios, único en la Historia, inmortal.
The real Vladimir Horowitz as still none will be of your incredible playing. Two different spirits play. However, how I wish you were here this day. You gave such pleasure, oh the world could use of it today. Vladimir Horowitz even if no roll-up bench as trying to adjust, the piano to you. I know the entity in your hands loved you as well your partner your wife!
I hope to be able to play like him when I turn his age, for that video I think he was like in his 80's? Who knew he would die 7 years after that performance it's crazy to think that
Just came from watching some fella called Lang x2 try and give this a go. I think it´s true to say although Chinese players recite our European works with carefully trained "gusto" (IE great swooping hand gestures, closed eyes and passionate frowns) it´s so artificial when seen played in a Euro style like Horowitz. I remember being told that when giving birth it´s better not to waste energy on writhing and screaming, but to control that energy into the core and let it focus the body internally. This is the same. Look at how little energy he spends expressing the music n his face, everything comes to his fingertips. Understated, powerful, unfolding, layers. He knows the work speaks for itself, no ego. B E A U T I F U L x
@@CamdenVSRG this 3 Interpretations I like very much: 1. Blechacz 2. Martha Argerich 3. Lukas Geniusas ...( very interesting interpretation is from Garrick Ohlsson because he plays it veeery slowy,but for me to much). So this are only my opions. Everyone has his favorits. Which are yours?
@@FrostDirt No. Zimmerman cheated ! He played some parts many times and the video was edited. In his ballade op 23 video look the stool. It is not the same in all the video !
Horowitz era un monstruo de la súper expresión Chopiniana. Parece sobrepasar lo compuesto por el autor. Pero esas libertades embellecen la interpretación. Grandioso Horowitz!!!
just imaging how Horowitz played this at his prime makes me mad...He was above everyone else all the time!! Sumpreme and unhuman technique and creativeness out of this world. This is not the best performance ever of this particular piece but he looks like he is capable to do whatever he wants to do with piano...and that is intimidating.
You know, I think you can say that yes, there were a lot of wrong notes... a lot of clipping and unfortunate problems... I can say that and still acknowledge that I'd never be a fraction of the pianist, much less performer, that he was. Indeed, flashes of brilliance abound, but it is nothing like his 1960's performances of the same piece, also on YT. It is a testament that despite profound depression and being doped out of his gourd that he was able to still play like that. Wow. Mad respect!
Горовиц выразил возможно больше чем хотел показать Шопен восхищение исполнением .К тому же обратите внимание на технику ведь он касается клавиши на коротком плече это какая должна быть чувствительность ! SUPER ULTRA CY
Si avverte una qualità del suono datata, da parte di Horowitz una certa discontinuità ed una personale cifra interpretativa, non sempre a mio modesto parere, rispondente alle intenzioni dell'autore. In molte esecuzioni di pianisti di nuove generazioni (Yuja Wang, ed altri) trovo una lettura più consona al dettato chopiniano con una dinamica più coinvolgente ed una forza espressiva maggiore.
Oh yeah baby! We’ll remember you and your sister killed it on the piano too AND his grandniece GéNIA who I have the honor of studying with is also amazing.
I love Horowitz’s playing, but I have a slight issue with the coda. More than the slight errors (let’s be honest, that passage is painful as heck), but I don’t think it has as much fire as the dynamic marking fuoco states. He played it a bit too light. Please don’t pounce on me for my attempt at constructive criticism haha
I agree, Rubinstein was closer to Chopin"s sensibility, he was as light and luminous as de composer, almost fairy in melancolic feeling and drama. This is too show off, violent, not Chopin's mood any more.
Many thinqs I respect about Horowitz; and the occasional wrong notes are expected at this point in his career. But deliberately adding notes for effect? Not so much. (e.g. LH, downbeat of bar 206; it's an open octave, but he takes upon himself to fill out the Gm chord.)
Crees que este es mal sonido? Sus grabaciones aún más viejas (1970/80) tienen un sonido terrible. Yo diría que en esta el sonido está más tecnológicamente desarrollado Obviamente eso no quita que con su perfección de pianista haga todo parecer una grabación del siglo 22.
By 1982, when this video was taken, he was descending into drug addiction. A year later he could barely play. He took a year off (1984), sobered up, and in the summer of 1985 roared back and reigned as the king of the piano for the next two years, whereupon he retired for good.
@@uliwidmaier5192 I didn't comment, on why he was not practicing like previousely, but what was direct reason in playing, not what was happening in his life.I like him anyway.
He plays with the most tender and utterly poignant passion. And most of all, Horowitz is not afraid of this difficult and very complex work. His interpretation is absolutely unique and comes from the heart.
Well said! Horowitz is of my favourite pianists. He has such a special way to play.
"will people remember me ?" he said before going back to the piano scene in his elderly age.
Of course we do.
yeah in the car on the last romantic documentary "he called him self last Invididualist" Own way to touch the keys
Always
One of the most
under estimated thing to say
I remember him also - with total disgust.
@@organman52 that's deep bro no need to be so upset that your'e not as sucessful as him you trashyalk a 80+yo man, we'll talk about that when you reach that age.
the fact that sometimes he plays notes an octave lower than Chopin wrote down makes me like this performance even more
Where are you referring?
@@jamespavlock9615 ^
@@PorscheGT-yj2me we need a time stamp buddy! How often and how many minutes and seconds into the video are these low octave occurrences? :p
2:37, 8:28
I really like it too especially with the bright bass he’s got on his piano, I like the extra punch and I miss it when it’s not there lol. He does it rach 3 and his 2nd sonata in a few places too
The way he strikes the piano at 8:20 is mesmerising. All other pianists being too careful but Horowitz just doesn't care. Beautiful.
If u like that kind of stuff u should listen to Lang Lang.
@@devplaying5475 nah Ivo Pog
@@ZKLofiTone ivo pogchamp
I listen to other younger pianists playing this...but for me, the weight of age is necessary to interpret this the way it is meant.
Yes, I know Chopin died young, but the emotion needed...has to be borne of experience. With it equal measures of failure and success.
I listen to this, it's like a song of my life. Anyone's life. Pain, stride, acceptance.
I love you Freideric for what you left for us.
And blessings to Mr Horrowitz....for his interpretation, his life force and giving my ears joy.
Your apreciation is very remarcable. You are absolutelly right.
My first time hearing this particular performance, and all I can say is a 79 year old man just kicked my ass. This was amazing, goosebumps and all!
I was fortunate to see Horowitz in Minneapolis at Northrup Auditorium in 1974. It was a life-changer.
This performance is insurmountable. This is the philosophers' stone of piano alchemy. How is this possible? This truly is a recorded miracle.
You are obviously out of your mind.
@@organman52 you are.
@@organman52 unnecessary toxicity in the classical piano community? who could've guessed!
@@eboone the toxicity is on stage producing a vile spectacle. End of story.
Statements like this outline the problem I proposed in my video segment on Music.
A commenter with no system of understanding performance, with no way of scientifically describing that they were hypnotized… by a bad performance: because it was an intuitive story regardless of the Information being all wrong: besides in many ways being a perfectly “surmountable” performance.
Notice your use of the word surmountable, and how it gives away your agreement that music is too a competition.
The music might not be surmountable in the sense that it was unique: because it was overly intuitive, overly in the moment in regards to the decision making being made: not prepared or artistic in its presentation.
*then you have fools in the responses to the comment calling others “toxic” for daring to point out the blatant reality of the notes being wrong! Of the performance in many ways being unsatisfactory, especially to people who have heard these things too long.*
What a confused weird crowd the modern listeners are.
He plays a bunch of wrong notes yet in some ways they enhance the performance. Horowitz is able to make any combination of notes work with beautiful elegance
Name a few... if you can?
I know it makes feel important to claim he’s played wrong notes... :-)
He could name the entire piece, which, objectively, is full of wrong notes, phrases, time stretching, and so on, but Horowitz's expressivity in a way or another balances these factors, enchanting the public more during a live performance than in a video on RUclips. For instance, Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli's recording is technically better, with the same expression as Horiwitz had, too. Maybe Horowitz follows only the first two pages of the sheet music, but the rest is as expressive as wrong, "perfectly balanced, as all things should be"
Yeah, Horowitz didn't subscribe to the view that everything should be played exactly as written. Some people criticize him for that but personally, I think it depends on the result. Horowitz was an amazing musician who had a feel for the music he played, his performances are almost always convincing, often utterly divine. This performance however is odd, I think he exaggerated a bit, some of his phrasing (which is usually impeccable) is a bit questionable, at least in my view.
For me it’s the piece as a whole (not the individual notes or passages) that determines how effective the performance was. The player needs to keep a certain flow throughout the piece to portray a piece well. If the individual passages and parts of a piece are flawless, but the artist fails to connect them properly, or fails to keep the playing style and quality homogeneous, the piece will lose part of, if not all of its meaning. At least that is my opinion.
Though I play guitar, I can tell Horowitz's hand movement is so efficient and minimal! From a distance, you can't even see his fingers move! Truly an example for new and old players of all instruments.
The octave differences are truly unique! I also love how much the ending coda bounces!
C’est la meilleure interprétation de cette magnifique Ballade ❤
This comes once every century if we’re lucky- in concert live - he mesmerizes and loves the audience with his music
So glad I got to hear him play this work he was always famous for. It was 6 years before this recital and on the West Coast (California). He gave two performances a week apart, the first one ended the printed program with this First Ballade and the following week he ended with Scriabin's 5th Sonata! Both recitals also contained the "Concerto Without Orchestra" by Schumann - his 3rd Sonata.
These are now available on Spotify. Horowitz in the 70s was out of the world. I consider both the Ballade and the Sonata 5 in that series of recitals to be one of the top performances for the respective works. Unfortunatetly, here in 1982, Horowitz's mental illness and addiction prevents him from playing as superbly as before (it is still fantastic, but not the best H. could've done). It is a fortune that he took a few years off before returning in the mid 80s.
OMG. I've never ever listen this version before. One of the best ever, I think. Great Horowitz
Not one of the best
IT IS THE BEST OF THE BEST
NO ONE CAN COMPARE WITH HIM
NEVER BEFORE AND NEVER IN THE FUTURE
As fortissimo as anyone can get!
eenayeah to my knowledge he had his pianos specially tuned & action. To achieve forte on this piano is easy, the trick is to be able to achieve any of other dynamic. That’s why he can just sit there and barely move and achieve fortissimo. It’s incredible that he’s able to control the dynamics on a piano with this type of action. He had a special touch
Listen to "Funérailles"...
@@Emma-ob5oj There is the fortissimo of the maestro Horowitz and there's the brash banging of the 88's by too many other pianists. Never mind the way that the action of this Steinway D was set. I had the fortune to play a few notes on this same piano - I'm not a pianist, I'm a wood finisher. My son played Carnival on this piano and also a Debussy piece, he's a pianist. Anyway, back to my point,, which is the ability or inability of a pianist to exercise control from the softest to the loudest notes, even when banging your forearm on the keys during a Berios piece.
Watching this Master, it amases me everytime how Horowitz manages his sound, that unique upload of differential levels of expressions and, above all, his capacity of interpretation - often resulted from the "response" of quiet listeners below stage - ... Thanks for posting this tresure of version "
I must have played back 8:20 like ten times. Absolutely gobsmacked at how perfectly he hit the lowest note.
Ni en un millón de años puede nacer otro ser humano que haga esto con el piano ni con ningún instrumento. Es un gigante, un dios, único en la Historia, inmortal.
我真的完全不明白為何他的表現如此異於其他演奏者。他當時腦袋究竟在想什麼…. 才有這樣驚歎的表現…
不是說其他表演者不好
但跟他真的是沒有可能比較的
無論音色 大小音量控制。
最厲害是意境 那種流動感
那種悲從中來。 那種憤怒 那種絕望
那種希望。…. 那時Chopin 的心情
全都可以在這首歌表演得淋漓盡致
Just look listen and learn for this man was a master at his craft much loves and still very much missed
5:07 sounds like freaking thunder.
hideous, isn't it?
@@organman52not at all
@@organman52nope it probably sounded awesome in person
@@DiegoDiego28281 I agree, so long as 'awesome' means 'BUTCHERED' beyond recognition.
@@organman52awesome means good are you dum
*Me peacefully listening
8:19 : "omg what did just happen is everyone there safe?"
The coda is honestly my favourite part. And it also sounds harder than it is
@@wandren912 it's pretty hard, probably the hardest part of the piece lol
@@indianawesomeness nah
@@finderrio literally yes
@@indianawesomeness I have played It and its the most difficult part, i confirm.
Absolutely spectacular
The real Vladimir Horowitz as still none will be of your incredible playing. Two different spirits play. However, how I wish you were here this day. You gave such pleasure, oh the world could use of it today. Vladimir Horowitz even if no roll-up bench as trying to adjust, the piano to you. I know the entity in your hands loved you as well your partner your wife!
Un sens incroyable de la structure "mentale" qui a dicté le discours, comme si on entrait dans le souffle "accordé" de Chopin....C'est époustouflant !
When Horowitz plays it feels like I’m listening to the song for the first time.
I hope to be able to play like him when I turn his age, for that video I think he was like in his 80's? Who knew he would die 7 years after that performance it's crazy to think that
Musicians as him never die
Just came from watching some fella called Lang x2 try and give this a go.
I think it´s true to say although Chinese players recite our European works with carefully trained "gusto" (IE great swooping hand gestures, closed eyes and passionate frowns) it´s so artificial when seen played in a Euro style like Horowitz.
I remember being told that when giving birth it´s better not to waste energy on writhing and screaming, but to control that energy into the core and let it focus the body internally. This is the same. Look at how little energy he spends expressing the music n his face, everything comes to his fingertips. Understated, powerful, unfolding, layers.
He knows the work speaks for itself, no ego.
B E A U T I F U L x
Magician performance, just bravo maestro, with love from New Jersey, USA.
He plays this so much better then every one else until now
What are your top three recordings of the piece today?
@@CamdenVSRG this 3 Interpretations I like very much: 1. Blechacz 2. Martha Argerich 3. Lukas Geniusas ...( very interesting interpretation is from Garrick Ohlsson because he plays it veeery slowy,but for me to much). So this are only my opions. Everyone has his favorits. Which are yours?
@@stephanhochkeppel9552 any opinion of Zimerman's? Isn't his considered the pinnacle of this Ballade's performance?
@@FrostDirt
No. Zimmerman cheated !
He played some parts many times and the video was edited.
In his ballade op 23 video look the stool. It is not the same in all the video !
Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli Joue merveilleusement et à la perfection!
I like 2:17 how he emphasized the melody on the left hand instead of on the right hand like most of the pianists do. How unique!
WOW, this performance blew me away!!!!
What a wonderful, wonderful artist, musician, everything!
Chopin and Horowitz are immortal.
Horowitz era un monstruo de la súper expresión Chopiniana. Parece sobrepasar lo compuesto por el autor. Pero esas libertades embellecen la interpretación. Grandioso Horowitz!!!
Maravilloso! inspiración para mi hijo pianista de siete años. Inmortal sea el verdadero arte.
8:05
내 최애 발라드 1번 연주자!
This is my treasure!!!❤
Muove il pianoforte con forza, grande!
8:46 that bass is out of this world. Awesome!!!
3:36 you can almost hear the string section sweetly supporting...
Always brings me to tears... ❤❤❤
Лучшее исполнение этого произведения, которое я слышала.
Amazing
Uff...even being ill he remains the best by far
just imaging how Horowitz played this at his prime makes me mad...He was above everyone else all the time!! Sumpreme and unhuman technique and creativeness out of this world. This is not the best performance ever of this particular piece but he looks like he is capable to do whatever he wants to do with piano...and that is intimidating.
Не пугает, а восхищает
No one plays the slow middle section like him. That run at 3:31 is so expressive
BEST BALLAD!!!!
When my piano teacher chides my "flat fingers"...I remind her of our great pianist here🙏
Уважаю этого дедушку!!
8:19 💀 bro sold his soul to play that
😂😂😂☠️
He makes the piano blast😵
晩年に近い頃の演奏でしょうか、
やはり音の魔術師です。
貴重な映像がネットで見れる時代になるとは！
Only one word for this performance! (Surpurb)
amazing
Truly wonderful. Bravo
Debemos dar gracias a Dios porque Vladimir Horowitz caminó entre nosotros.
You know, I think you can say that yes, there were a lot of wrong notes... a lot of clipping and unfortunate problems... I can say that and still acknowledge that I'd never be a fraction of the pianist, much less performer, that he was. Indeed, flashes of brilliance abound, but it is nothing like his 1960's performances of the same piece, also on YT. It is a testament that despite profound depression and being doped out of his gourd that he was able to still play like that. Wow. Mad respect!
his left hand is so powerful!
Горовиц выразил возможно больше чем хотел показать Шопен восхищение исполнением .К тому же обратите внимание на технику ведь он касается клавиши на коротком плече это какая должна быть чувствительность ! SUPER ULTRA CY
Incredible voicing
yes - beyond the realm of believability
you know it's going to be amazing when you see the pianist fixing the piano's position and not the chair's
5:50
Horowitz was incredible
He is playing with flat fingers. Is that normal?
No it isn't.
he has a very good fundmental and techniques !
Una maquina
Horowitz is the king of this piece
4:08 to 4:12 where you can cough in public......
👏👏👏👏👏
best piano player ever will go to him
Fantastic for his age
Si avverte una qualità del suono datata, da parte di Horowitz una certa discontinuità ed una personale cifra interpretativa, non sempre a mio modesto parere, rispondente alle intenzioni dell'autore. In molte esecuzioni di pianisti di nuove generazioni (Yuja Wang, ed altri) trovo una lettura più consona al dettato chopiniano con una dinamica più coinvolgente ed una forza espressiva maggiore.
❤❤❤❤❤🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍀
He doesn't adjust himself to the piano, he adjust the piano to him 😂
Now I can say play this Ballade better than Horowitz
chi meglio di Lui nessuno!
Oh yeah baby! We’ll remember you and your sister killed it on the piano too AND his grandniece GéNIA who I have the honor of studying with is also amazing.
It gets scary when horowitz takes the pedal off in a fast passage
8:18 😍😍
Y todo de memoria ? No veo donde està la partitura ...La verdad
Nadie que se respete toca esta pieza con la partitura delante.
録音のせいかもしれないし、私のスマホのせいかもしれない。音が割れてる。特にフォルテ。
ガシャーンって音が凄まじい😵
ホロヴィッツって音色が素晴らしい代名詞と聞いてますが🙉どうしてかな
I love Horowitz’s playing, but I have a slight issue with the coda. More than the slight errors (let’s be honest, that passage is painful as heck), but I don’t think it has as much fire as the dynamic marking fuoco states. He played it a bit too light.
Please don’t pounce on me for my attempt at constructive criticism haha
chnshum u malenkix detey yest???
I love Horowitz but Arthur Rubinstein is on another level specially playing Chopin.
I agree, Rubinstein was closer to Chopin"s sensibility, he was as light and luminous as de composer, almost fairy in melancolic feeling and drama. This is too show off, violent, not Chopin's mood any more.
So many wrong notes but still best
How is it I didn't see any Your Lie in April comments
Many thinqs I respect about Horowitz; and the occasional wrong notes are expected at this point in his career. But deliberately adding notes for effect? Not so much. (e.g. LH, downbeat of bar 206; it's an open octave, but he takes upon himself to fill out the Gm chord.)
4:07 why did the sneeze have to ruin one of the most beautiful parts bru
kak mojno iz cheloveka v muxu prevratit?
Perfect
where are you found this movie ?
Yete Imanain inch, right? Erku glxani ararats@ inch er...
and so Hndikner@ enqan ein horinel vor xosqi vran voch mek bani tex chi dnum.
el mal sonido no compromete su caracter de numero 1 indiscutido
Crees que este es mal sonido? Sus grabaciones aún más viejas (1970/80) tienen un sonido terrible. Yo diría que en esta el sonido está más tecnológicamente desarrollado Obviamente eso no quita que con su perfección de pianista haga todo parecer una grabación del siglo 22.
Psychologyn vorna???
He was still technically capable but needed to practice bit more too, like he was practicing previously in life.
By 1982, when this video was taken, he was descending into drug addiction. A year later he could barely play. He took a year off (1984), sobered up, and in the summer of 1985 roared back and reigned as the king of the piano for the next two years, whereupon he retired for good.
@@uliwidmaier5192 I didn't comment, on why he was not practicing like previousely, but what was direct reason in playing, not what was happening in his life.I like him anyway.
Penso che il Suo cervello sia diviso in due... Anzi penso che abbia due cervelli!
es asuma yes, es du arants Vitamins at all... nman enq??? :))))