ScienceCasts: Big Mystery in the Perseus Cluster

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 июл 2014
  • Visit science.nasa.gov/ for more.
    A mysterious X-ray signal from the Perseus cluster of galaxies, which researchers say cannot be explained by known physics, could be a key clue to the nature of Dark Matter.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 104

  • @realcawnflakes
    @realcawnflakes 10 лет назад +5

    It really is incredible how one little line can spawn a multi-million dollar project. I love science.

  • @nicolemiller2222
    @nicolemiller2222 10 лет назад +30

    ITS THE GETH
    QUICK, LOCATE SHEPARD

    • @30mmBalistic
      @30mmBalistic 10 лет назад

      Meh.. the Geth have been upstaged by The Darkness...skipped the Destiny beta I see.

    • @nicolemiller2222
      @nicolemiller2222 10 лет назад

      30mmBalistic why are you talking to me???? who said you could talk to me? i need to fire them

    • @30mmBalistic
      @30mmBalistic 10 лет назад

      Nicole Miller Meth head say what?

    • @DMCFreak
      @DMCFreak 10 лет назад +2

      30mmBalistic I'll go with the Geth, since destiny seems to be using Mass Effects discarded storyline. ;) *shots fired*

    • @TheShootist
      @TheShootist 9 лет назад

      Reaper reaper.

  • @swrennie
    @swrennie 10 лет назад +3

    Why couldn't it be a new, unknown element being produced in such an extreme environment?

  • @TheTrueMorningStar
    @TheTrueMorningStar 10 лет назад +11

    Could it be a previously undiscovered stable heavy element?

    • @foghaze
      @foghaze 10 лет назад +2

      It appears that way.

    • @MageSutek
      @MageSutek 9 лет назад

      An interesting hypothesis, but if that is the case, why only one spike in the readings? If it were a stable element, we would be seeing multiple spikes using the same technique that discovered this one. Then again, perhaps it is only detectable using certain means and this was a fluke.
      Would be pretty bitchin if we could harvest some of this stuff. I have a feeling it would answer quite a few questions about a number of things.

    • @you2tooyou2too
      @you2tooyou2too 8 лет назад

      +Adam Kelley Where would this 'new element' fit in the periodic table? In any case, there would have to be a huge mass of this material or phenomenon, for it to be detectable at such intensity and distance. Does that tell us more about its source?

  • @Black_Hole_Institute
    @Black_Hole_Institute 10 лет назад +1

    I read papers of Bulbul and Boyarsky carefully. In my recent work I am going to check evidences for 7 keV sterile neutrino by counting dwarf X-ray galaxies. Preliminary results gives lower bound for DM particle mass - 7-8 keV.

  • @vlad1972
    @vlad1972 10 лет назад

    One question: the mystery line was detected recently because of having better instruments (Chandra and other telescopes orbiting Earth) or because of the galaxies and clusters that are being observed?

  • @DaleGraessle
    @DaleGraessle 10 лет назад

    This is certainly a very interesting discovery which warrants further investigation. While the researchers haven't been able to identify the emission line as being associated with known materials, that it is detected by multiple observatories is most important. Even if it turns out *not* to be dark matter emission, it would only open up a greater mystery to be solved.

  • @youtubasoarus
    @youtubasoarus 10 лет назад

    What does this mean? Dynamic physics? (No constants?)

  • @chrisreeve853
    @chrisreeve853 10 лет назад +4

    Astrophysicists might also consider laboratory plasma phenomena as a possible explanation, alongside new physics. In the laboratory, there are things like critical ionization velocities and state changes between dark, glow & arc modes. It's fine to suggest that cosmic plasmas are probably unlike laboratory plasmas in more than one regard, but at the inferential step, it seems only logical to at least consider electrical laboratory plasma physics explanations in our attempts to understand a highly ionized, superheated plasma which is observed emitting unexpected x-rays. After all, there are some plasma researchers (like Anthony Peratt) who insist that plasma phenomena do approximately scale over enormous magnitudes. And radio astronomer Gerrit Verschuur continues to publish on his claimed observations of critical ionization velocities associated with interstellar filaments -- which he insists will not be seen with some algorithmic approach.
    To a person who views the universe as fundamentally gravitational, certain sudden large-scale changes are not expected. To a person who additionally or alternatively questions the cosmic plasma models, sudden, dramatic large-scale changes are still on the table, and there are many classical physics tools at their disposal to explain them. If the consistent choice that is made is to take observations which tend to refer to electricity -- ions, hot plasma, x-rays -- and to use that to point to dark matter, then as an outsider layperson looking in at this activity, I have to wonder what is going on here. The cosmic plasma models seem to be treated as unquestionable fact. They manage to completely escape questioning, even though they significantly deviate from our plasma observations from the laboratory.
    If, as the researchers narrow in on this signal, they notice that it's originating from an object that involves twisting plasma filaments, then I don't mean this as disrespectful to any of the scientists involved in this research, but maybe it's time to question space's claimed electrical neutrality. Quasi-neutrality does not necessarily imply a lack of conductance ...
    www.thunderbolts.info/faq/quasineutral.htm

    • @slaveofmonstery
      @slaveofmonstery 10 лет назад

      Amen Chris Reeve!

    • @erasethepatterns1
      @erasethepatterns1 9 лет назад

      Nice! And If I may add... as a person "looking in", quit nullifying your accomplishments with poor sportsmanship.

  • @wratched
    @wratched 10 лет назад +12

    But... if it radiates, then by definition it isn't dark matter, right?

    • @albertfeyen3478
      @albertfeyen3478 10 лет назад +4

      Right so it can't be this "DARK MATTER" That they love to use to explain everything.

    • @Nexus2Eden
      @Nexus2Eden 10 лет назад +1

      However it can be the signature of dark matter - i.e, an echo or distortion of space/time. As the article states - it isn't any known matter or transition of matter, hence it may be some form of artifact of an event or antimatter.
      It would be like how we can verify the Higg's Boson. We can't 'see' the boson directly - only the effect of its presence or temporary existence. The shockwave of the event - not the cause of it. If that helps.

    • @seffard
      @seffard 10 лет назад +1

      You are asking as if part of the problem is already solved, when nothing is actually. They have nothing but hints and clues.

    • @Nexus2Eden
      @Nexus2Eden 10 лет назад +1

      seffard That's why it's call research honey. ;)

    • @seffard
      @seffard 10 лет назад +1

      Nexus2Eden Yes, ok. Im not sure you know I meant to Wratched's comment.

  • @jiminglis9030
    @jiminglis9030 10 лет назад

    how about the idea that everything in the whole of everything influences each and every part within the whole of everything as to influence and placement meaning no part is randomly placed but directed by the influence of a massive whole. there then is a reason for placement and function and influence and appearance.

  • @odonnaghan
    @odonnaghan 10 лет назад

    Thank you!

  • @jaydeesy1575
    @jaydeesy1575 10 лет назад

    Could this be some kind of communication?

  • @alancheira
    @alancheira 10 лет назад +7

    Some people need lessons on history of science. First, the cycle of: we don't know something, so call it this or that, then look for what it may be, already happened many times. That's how science goes forward some times. If you don't want to accept it, that's your problem. Just make sure to educate yourself.

    • @foghaze
      @foghaze 10 лет назад +3

      LOL. So you would like for them to say "Anomaly 384875?" That's too hard to remember. For now Dark Matter is the scientific name it shall have until it is explained. Headline: Update on "The we don't know what it is phenomenon" but have found something unbelievable". That title isn't too catchy. It also sounds ridiculous.

    • @864208642
      @864208642 10 лет назад

      A lot of trolls in these feeds.
      I wonder why these anti-science people even waste their time.
      Of course their presence here makes about as much sense as the comments they make. So who knows, maybe they actually are interested in the world around us. They just don't have the knowledge & the world view to try to understand it.
      Then again we have a word for people who learn stuff but cant understand it don't we.

    • @foghaze
      @foghaze 9 лет назад

      ScienceRules Because they suck at science and denouncing it as rubbish is much easier for them than actually taking the time to learn it. JMO

  • @RainxOnxMex
    @RainxOnxMex 10 лет назад +9

    Aliens.

    • @12345ApplejuiceBum
      @12345ApplejuiceBum 10 лет назад +4

      Aliens 3 & 4

    • @VendPrekmurec
      @VendPrekmurec 10 лет назад

      12345ApplejuiceBum
      lol according to Michichu Kaku? xD

    • @gc3k
      @gc3k 10 лет назад +1

      send in the marines!

  • @chimkinNuggz
    @chimkinNuggz 10 лет назад +3

    Wait sorry for my ignorance but what can this possibly mean? A new element or demension? Or????

    • @Nexus2Eden
      @Nexus2Eden 10 лет назад

      Or the sound of dark energy or dark matter.

    • @12345ApplejuiceBum
      @12345ApplejuiceBum 10 лет назад +2

      Poptart. I bet it was a Poptart.

  • @ahmadhadder9834
    @ahmadhadder9834 10 лет назад +7

    I'll like the video to pretend that I understood everything.

  • @mugeatis2280
    @mugeatis2280 10 лет назад

    we proud of you! :)

  • @petros_adamopoulos
    @petros_adamopoulos 10 лет назад +1

    String theory has no less than 10^60 explanations for it already. Win.

  • @beatrizmartino680
    @beatrizmartino680 9 лет назад

    Q/Hermoso es el Universo, gracias por mostrarmelo, Tan Deslumbrante!!!!

  • @Metafalcario23
    @Metafalcario23 10 лет назад +1

    Definitely Geth.

  • @firejack007
    @firejack007 10 лет назад +7

    What? Something that scientists admit they don't know? Usually they give us some theory as a fact.

    • @darkxfbi
      @darkxfbi 10 лет назад +14

      uhh I don't think you follow science that well. Unless you get your science articles from the Daily Mail, you'll see that scientists find things that they can't definitively explain and they admit it all the time. They usually just suggest a plausible hypothesis. It's just the media sensationalizes it and presents it as fact or proven theory. That's why you get articles saying things like: "Smelling other peoples farts could prevent cancer" :/

    • @thetubeinsideyou
      @thetubeinsideyou 10 лет назад +1

      darkxfbi lol

    • @CReaper210
      @CReaper210 10 лет назад +12

      No they don't. I think you're mistaking scientists for theists.

    • @864208642
      @864208642 10 лет назад

      Glad your interested in Science.
      But it sounds like you're trolling for comments. Since everyone that stayed awake during 8th grade science class would know what you are saying is not true.
      And of course, you cant be a Christian. Since Exodus 20:16 has a nice comment about bearing false witness and we wouldn't want to sin would we?

  • @BladeRunner1868
    @BladeRunner1868 9 лет назад

    Perhaps it is Carl Sagan trying to communicate with his fellow scientists!!. "Contact", what a wonderful science fiction movie!!

  • @199NickYT
    @199NickYT 10 лет назад +2

    Aren't chemists trying to isolate an "island of stability" in the periodic table? Perhaps an element from this "island" has been formed in the cluster somehow?

  • @astrogirl1usa
    @astrogirl1usa 10 лет назад +2

    I hope the new element, or whatever it is, will be named a 'Bulbulon', or a 'Bulbulino', or similar. Bulbul led the team that discovered it and published a paper on it first. So, it should be named after her. :D

  • @ralphwalters906
    @ralphwalters906 10 лет назад

    1:27 3560 keV? He means 3560 eV (3.56 keV like the chart shows). 3560 keV would be 3.56 MeV.

  • @Azzataky
    @Azzataky 10 лет назад

    I wish I had known I love universe so much back when I was younger. Now in 27 years its too late I think to study math again and get to some science which deals with anything in universe, planets, stars, galaxies, whatever. Well, at least I can wish a lot of luck to those who've found out that earlier than me. :)

  • @dciencemat2399
    @dciencemat2399 10 лет назад

    This mystery may go on 100 years from now.

  • @lightsidemaster
    @lightsidemaster 10 лет назад

    And it couldn't just be a new unknown element/molecule?

  • @adlsfreund
    @adlsfreund 10 лет назад

    3,560 keV? 1:26

  • @nmarbletoe8210
    @nmarbletoe8210 10 лет назад

    AMAZing discovery. Nobel prize stuff, if it leads to what dark matter really is. PS love her name "Bulbul" it's one of my favorite birds!

  • @dragonlawshuh5092
    @dragonlawshuh5092 10 лет назад +2

    Its cool that can be found so far away.. but a missing plane can not be found on earth. hmm

  • @oker59
    @oker59 10 лет назад

    Didn't Ting(discoverer of the Charmed quarke back in the 1970s) find evidence of dark matter by means of odd x-rays from our own galaxy also?
    The evidence mounts!

  • @arenaren3077
    @arenaren3077 10 лет назад

    Does it mean that there is a power source supplying all these galaxies and stars in the universe as mention in the Book of Job 38:19-20 and Enoch 17:3?

  • @assdffsasd
    @assdffsasd 10 лет назад

    A red/blue shifted object imposed behind would explain it.

  • @OverlordZephyros
    @OverlordZephyros 10 лет назад +1

    aliens?? lol

  • @bobert4him
    @bobert4him 10 лет назад

    Maybe we should call it the "Devil" particle.

  • @richardleigh4003
    @richardleigh4003 10 лет назад

    Science.nasa.gov describes this object as looking like "a cloud of gas in which each atom is a whole galaxy"...

  • @OliverSyri
    @OliverSyri 9 лет назад +4

    I watching NASA because i want learn more with the space and im 10years old

  • @ahbanuteh338
    @ahbanuteh338 10 лет назад

    pleiadians! :D

  • @americandevil
    @americandevil 10 лет назад

    nice ... narrated by HAL3000

  • @NicosMind
    @NicosMind 10 лет назад +3

    That Esra Bulbul is pretty sweet. Bet those scientists are just trying to get laid by suggesting its named after her. Don't blame them :P

  • @rockeysha9485
    @rockeysha9485 10 лет назад

    an echo?

  • @noangelsaroundme
    @noangelsaroundme 10 лет назад

    Dark mass effect; while dark energy and dark matter are the same in nature by conception.

  • @carlosg617
    @carlosg617 10 лет назад

    Go Get Those Geckos!!

  • @teckyify
    @teckyify 10 лет назад +1

    Clearly aliens. I always take the least probable possibility to win high.

  • @billgosset1815
    @billgosset1815 10 лет назад

    Does Kryptonite ring a bell to any of you geniuses’?

  • @ManofWater
    @ManofWater 10 лет назад

    WE'VE LANDED ON THE MOON!

  • @IanAtkinson555
    @IanAtkinson555 10 лет назад

    Big Mystery in the Perseus Cluster.

  • @pabloantoniocapera1178
    @pabloantoniocapera1178 8 лет назад

    Here, no more than 15 kms deep, we don´t know all. There, millions of light years must be all possiblities of other materials ands rares species Congratulations, NASA

  • @davidcakemann6854
    @davidcakemann6854 10 лет назад +2

    dark matter! yeah! hooray dark matter!

  • @NikolaMilovic
    @NikolaMilovic 10 лет назад

    Everything doctrine called "dark", will never be deciphered using the funds of matter and energy, because it's something that does not belong to this entity. Who can argue that calculate how the universe has matter and dark energy and dark matter, if at all and neither does what it represents the dark. This perception of the universe is, indeed, not knowing the nature of the universe completely.

  • @donpeyote9677
    @donpeyote9677 9 лет назад

    get a grip on things a little closer to home first.

  • @breadbassed
    @breadbassed 10 лет назад

    eiπ + 1 = 0

  • @tulioburbano5174
    @tulioburbano5174 9 лет назад

    Es claro la ciencia no tiene nada q ver con creencias la realidad humana seria diferente si no nos gobernaran las falacias.

  • @dewerbylhserf
    @dewerbylhserf 10 лет назад +1

    God Knows

  • @stevenrwh
    @stevenrwh 10 лет назад

    First nerd to comment.

  • @lvelez1999
    @lvelez1999 9 лет назад

    If it were.not for God there would be no universe. No nothing. This wonderful science only proves His Greatness even more.
    Thanks and Praise to You JESUS +

  • @markcwells
    @markcwells 8 лет назад

    Constructive interference.