Have you ever done 1 on The Hinterflacken farm incident that happened in 1920s Germany?Bavaria i think,a most interesting,strange+spooky tale,please do it if not(going to have to check now) Edit; Just checked+yes you did the Hinterkaiflak murders in Season 1(going to give it a listen again now) well done sir,you truly have your "finger on the pulse"
I agree with you about the skulls. Those were probably just the victims of more " normal " crime ; people with gambling debts , those who knew too much , etc... And I'll bet you could dam up and search any river in any city and find skulls. If you searched the Anacostia river , which is near where I live , you'd find enough skulls to rival the Paris catacombs .
Weird to complain about the cops beating a confession out of him while at the same time agreeing he's 100% guilty. The alternative would be that without the confession, he may have gone free. Most of us have a moral blindspot, where we don't mind if a guilty person is wronged in the pursuit of justice. Those who don't believe his guilt would be the only ones to criticize the coercion.
No, when it comes to LE committing it that is more than a moral blind spot as you suggested. LE should always be professional and held to a higher standard, we don't want possible false confessions and/or risk of cases thrown, unnecessary doubt for jurors, etc. They have too much influence on cases and power to bring or not bring a case to trial to ever allow any of that sort of thing on any person which would suggest it may be done with any suspect who is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty.
I have to wonder if he was paid to 'dispose' of older children/undesirables (perhaps by the gentry - villagers used euphemism in a hush). TY, Ben! Cheers!!!
Welcome back
Have you ever done 1 on The Hinterflacken farm incident that happened in 1920s Germany?Bavaria i think,a most interesting,strange+spooky tale,please do it if not(going to have to check now) Edit; Just checked+yes you did the Hinterkaiflak murders in Season 1(going to give it a listen again now) well done sir,you truly have your "finger on the pulse"
I agree with you about the skulls. Those were probably just the victims of more " normal " crime ; people with gambling debts , those who knew too much , etc... And I'll bet you could dam up and search any river in any city and find skulls. If you searched the Anacostia river , which is near where I live , you'd find enough skulls to rival the Paris catacombs .
D.C or DMV in the house?
Weird to complain about the cops beating a confession out of him while at the same time agreeing he's 100% guilty. The alternative would be that without the confession, he may have gone free. Most of us have a moral blindspot, where we don't mind if a guilty person is wronged in the pursuit of justice. Those who don't believe his guilt would be the only ones to criticize the coercion.
No, when it comes to LE committing it that is more than a moral blind spot as you suggested. LE should always be professional and held to a higher standard, we don't want possible false confessions and/or risk of cases thrown, unnecessary doubt for jurors, etc. They have too much influence on cases and power to bring or not bring a case to trial to ever allow any of that sort of thing on any person which would suggest it may be done with any suspect who is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty.
I have to wonder if he was paid to 'dispose' of older children/undesirables (perhaps by the gentry - villagers used euphemism in a hush). TY, Ben! Cheers!!!