Most Deserving Rugby RED CARDS in 2022
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 ноя 2024
- I hope you enjoy it, if you did please hit the like button and subscribe for new videos every week! THANKS🏆
JOIN THE CLAN!! GRAB YOURSELF SOME MERCH🥼👕🏉
Kolloz: www.kolloz.com...
Redbubble: www.redbubble.....
What on Earth is Happening in Rugby? Part 5 Brutal Cleanouts RED CARD🤯
• Video
What on Earth is Happening in Rugby? - Brutal RED CARDS part 4
www.youtube.co....
What on Earth is Happening in Rugby - Part 3 Brutal RED CARDS
www.youtube.co....
What on Earth is Happening in Rugby?! | Most Brutal RED CARDSᴴᴰ
www.youtube.co....
The Trolling King | Maro Itoje Big Hits, Tackle Bust & Tries | Tributeᴴᴰ
www.youtube.co....
Peceli Yato Clermont's Wrecking Ball | Tributeᴴᴰ
www.youtube.co....
The Fijian Sledgehammer | Eroni Sau Big Hits, Tries & Tackle Bust | Tributeᴴᴰ
www.youtube.co....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This channel is for every rugby fan.
The Rugby Clan will feature videos that are all about Rugby, League, and NFL from the following competitions:
NRL, Super League, Rugby 7s & 9s, Rugby X, Gallagher Premiership, Guinness Pro 14, Super Rugby, School Boy Rugby, Interschools Rugby, Rugby Challenge, Currie Cup, Varsity Rugby, Gold Cup, Top League, European Championship Cup, French Top 14, Mitre 10 Cup, Craven Week.
There will also be rugby big hits videos, rugby best steps, best rugby players, fasters rugby players, Rugby union vs Rugby League vs NFL.
We do not own any of the footage we use, We create rugby tribute videos for the purpose of entertainment and promotion of the sports or players we are doing videos on. We will not copy and past any footage, We are creating video edits under the grounds of fair use.
Tags:
rugby union,rugby,rugby clan,rugby highlights,super rugby,Rugby,rugby hits,rugby huge hits,rugby tributes,rugby young players,sport,rugby pass,rugby skills,rugby schoolboy,rugby world cup,rugby video game,rugby skill moments,rugby best hits,rugby big hits,rugby montages,sports best moments,sport highlights,Most Deserving Red Card Tackles In Rugby,rugby red card,rugby bad tackles,rugby pod,rugby dangrous tackles,rugby scary,rugby knockout
Remarkable how important the TMO is. Almost none of these is spotted on-field and assessed as a red card. Makes you think about the lower levels of play....
I agree. American Football uses 7 officials for only 22 total players. I imagine having only 3 officials on field for 30 players would be incredibly difficult to see most things.
It's kind of what you expect when it comes to lower level. In a provincial match neckrolls ect are pretty much legal because the ref can't catch everything. It's knowing how to play without being caught. It sucks, but it's how it is.
In lower grades, it's mostly amateurs, without the money involved there's less need to "win at all costs". Sure there are some super competitive players, but in the main they are there to play the game, and the deliberate fouls just aren't as prevalent.
Money ruins everything
This is the reason why playing in an English Schools competition game I was punched in the side of the face and then red carded. No TMO, no clear view from lines judge so both players “initiating” the fight were given a red card despite my reaction solely being to laugh at the player who punched me whilst a fight began within the two teams
Players can police the lower levels. I don't remember any high shots.
6:20 may be an important point to highlight. The player was asking what he should've done. We saw this kind of clearout a ton this year, including in the Japan allblacks game. If you can not get under the player, go over to latch on their back and lift/push/roll depending on local rules. There is a very good explanation done by nigel owens himself as a response to the japan example. Honestly, when it comes down to that kind of situation where the player has gotten that low already without briding, they've all but outright won the ball, and you may be better of not engaging. If there is no safe hit, dont hit.
And that is a really good point - the player coming in always has the option NOT to hit!
Agree with the takeaway - dont hit - but think the officials need to do better at penalising / deterring illegal moves at the breakdown. Stormers player is clearly "off-feet", not supporting body weight, hands on the floor, so should be penalised but we see far too often that this type of play is permitted. Bundi shouldnt even need to go in here, in the knowledge that its a penalty and probable yellow card for cynical killing of the play. If the ruck gets cleaned up, then would players feel the need to fly into rucks, clearing players that have "gotten low"?
@@jmurphy9657 Agree
In aki's case he shouldn't have charged in from a long way out, shouldn't have dived on the player, and should have bound onto the player. He's a pro rugby player, he should know all this, he shouldn't be arguing with the ref like he's James Haskell ☺️
I'm a big fan of Aki but he seems to be cultivating a career trend of back hits resulting in red cards. Also arguing with the referee after the card in the way he did is unacceptable in the game.
'Where do you want me!?!?'
"Off the pitch!"
Love the reaction of the first red card player agreed with the decision and made sure he apologized to the opponent and shook his hand
I love the guy in the blue jersey flying kneed the guy in the white shirt and was like “what? I’m out?!”
Players and fans need to understand that in order for rugby to have a chance of surviving in the future, head contact needs to be a no-go. When you sign up to play rugby you know it’s a highly physical game where injuries are commonplace: fractures, sprains, ACLs, you name it. And we accept it because we enjoy the physical nature of the game. But no one signs up thinking that they’re risking brain injuries, that’s just too much of a risk. Even though it’s been a tough process to get the new laws right, I believe we are starting to see a change in the mentality of players. If you are not in a position to make a safe tackle, you don’t move into the player. If the jackal is too low, and you can’t clear the player safely, then the ball is lost. If you can’t attempt to block the kick without risking to hit the kicker, you don’t commit. If you are not in a position to contest a high ball, you wait until the player lands and then tackle him/her. It’s these slow changes in mindset that will make rugby a safer sport in the future, not reckless old-school hubris.
Excellent post, it's rare to see someone who "gets it". The law changes and directives aren't making the game "soft" as so many (usually South Africans for some reason) like to bang on about - it's about saving the game from financial ruin from the lawsuits that are going to continue to rain down on World Rugby from brain-damaged former players if they aren't seen to be doing everything they can to prevent head injury.
As a new fan to this sport (union) rugby - i really appreciate how the official explains why player is being tossed. So many dumb ir questionable calls in american sports get zero explantion. But it also lets player learn how to approach future situations
Lomax's collision 3:10 was just purely a prop who had no chance to lower his height with the quick direction change of the Irish attack. Unfortunate and unavoidable but still a red card offence regardless by all the current standards. Certainly no intent however.
1:29 Watching this replay live, I gave myself a concussion from facepalming so hard.
I played in the late 60s through into the 70s and only a few of these would have resulted in a penalty. Having said that I still carry the results of some of the injuries which I sustained as a prop. It is right that we protect today's players, particularly from head and neck injuries, but at the end of the day it is a contact sport which comes with risk. The balance between maintaining the physicality of the game and safety is incredibly difficult, but I hope that some common sense will prevail.
Some absolute shockers in this vid. Can't believe that pro players still make such stupid tackles.
Some of those were absolute genuine collisions
There's so much work to be done yet to protect players. And the first thing is to differentiate accidents from obvious acts of foul play. The France-SA game is a perfect example. Both are red cards surely, but is there really nothing to separate the two? The citing commission's answer was yes, there's something indeed. A week. 4 weeks for Dupont and 3 for Du Toit. 4 weeks for the accident, 3 weeks for sheer thuggery. Only on appeal was Dupont's ban cut in half but isn't it a shame that he had to go through that in the first place? Everybody knows the guy's a class act. You've never seen a 9 so well-tempered ^^
Unfortunately the same thing happened with Kurt Lee and he was given a 4 week ban. Also a lovely chap. But both him and the Frenchmen both had absolutely no chance in hell getting the ball in there respective contests… somehow the saffa was given a longer ban?
Side note - both deserve a ban for the negligence
@@tyroneerasmus6759 I don't find that too convincing though... It's in the right order of the game to compete for the ball, no matter how slim your chances of getting it might be. You might get a red card for it if it's dangerous and it's right. But diving head first straight into the face of another player is not only dangerous but also not in the spirit of the game. It's just like a punch, an eye gouge or an elbow in the face. That should warrant a longer ban every day, even with all the silly mitigations the citing commission might find.
Now I'm not blaming the Boks more than any other team, just picking a convenient example there. All the teams do this kind of stuff. And all the bans should be just the same for the same offense.
You clearly were watching a different game. Du Toit definitely deserved a red as did Dupont, but sheer thuggery, you joking mate.. coming from an Englishman watch it again and look at Du Toit’s record too.
Also you saying no ban for Dupont, love the player and was a mistake for sure but rewatch the game and if you come to the same conclusion maybe you should rethink commenting on here, you’re a joke.
What's interesting is how many of these happen because people try and pull out rather than completing the tackle. Also imo being hit by a shot that gets your opponent sent off should lead to an immediate HIA
Especially the hits in the air. Don't try and pull out and you'll hit them higher causing less damage
😊
Why? Foul play isn't determined by injury, it is determined by foul play. Why must the receiving player do a mandatory HIA?
@@christoduplessis8177 if foul play is committed on a player with respect to head contact that is considered high enough of a danger to red card the hitting player then the player who was hit should go off for a HIA imo. Degree of danger is taken into the card decision - foul play is foul play because it is dangerous
@@ghostguin1398 no because you don't referee the outcome but the action (that is what they taight us as referee school on South Africa). I don't see why the recipient must be punished because someone else broke the law. That is for the doctors to decide. I think it is a silly idea.
Many head collisions are reckless absolutely but most deserving?. Deserving is deliberately going in to hurt the other player when they are defenseless and you have nearly zero chance of being hurt yourself. A lot of head collisions are just bad judgement and unlucky and have both players out for the count.
I love how, in rugby, most of the time the players are calm and accept the decision that the ref has made. Makes me wish football was like this.
Thank you for including women's rugby examples as well- just because they're girls, doesn't mean card behaviour and tackles don't occur.
That is a definite red card for that dengerous high tackel on the ulster player.
I thought DuPont's red was harsh you could see he was looking up at the ball.
I do wonder how some of these happen so high up in the professional game, one of the first things you learn is that you don't contact the head
That one with pieter steph kwagga pushed him from behind he was never in control. Was it reckless yes was it accidental yes.
1:25 - for me this is probably the worst one of the lot. That kind of contact can result in a broken neck due to the compression.
The one at 8:25 should be a suspension. He had no chance of blocking that kick and just jumped into the opponent.
New to rugby, and there is something I dont understand.
What are the rules regarding jumping receivers? That is, the moment the ball is flying in the air, and two players of opposing teams are running towards it with the intention of getting the ball without looking at each other. Who has the priority? The jumping player? The offensive player?
Thanks!
Sorry to see nobody answered you after all this time.
The receiver has priority. But it's a bit more nuanced than that. Opposing players can contest for the ball in the air but the player who didn't catch it must ensure that he doesn't affect the landing of the player who did catch it. Hope that answers your question.
7:19 wait, his own teammate pushed #7 into blue player! Thats unintentional, no? Or doesnt matter in Rugby?
Notice that a lot of the European sides tend to do the Soccer reaction to get attention to the hit. The French front rower held his head like he had been stabbed in the head. Then the player who fell off of Bismarcks back deserves an Oscar.
0:56 respect and apology is need when an opponent has made a mistake or something reckless by accident
Tackling technique has to change....back to taking players low
too think...we used to play this as kids from 9 y.o. at school ,in the army, cricket in later life,now nearly 60 am knackered,lol. Spirit is willing but the body,sadly lacks.
if someone know 6.08 how to you make a clean out there, i dont see any other option, that seems more like the defenders fault for making himself into that position?
Didn't Swinton get a red card on his Wallabies debut as well?
Don't think is I think he got a yellow but was then banned for 6 weeks
As far as I recall, the incident in the thumbnail was a yellow card 👀
Intresting point ruan jvr was back in the first after a long injurie
1:07 the tackle that cost England the World Cup
have to say, I've always disagreed with the dupont card about 5 mins in. He is the receiving player under the ball, the bok jumps into the air between Dupont and the ball, surely its on the Bok player to prioritise the safety of the player in postion to recieve the ball and not jump in a way that is essentially a kung fu kick to Duponts face.
I never understsnd how you cam be sent off for an accidental clash of heads
Feel sorry for Steph du toit, not his fault cause Kwaga smit clearly pushes him into the tackle
it was a toss up if he went or the number 12 or in fact both of them
@Mike Luke I would not have been surprised to see one off and one in the bin there.
some of these are definitely unintentional what is a defender meant to do in these situations? we can't mitigate some of these
Remarkable in the Woman’s Final that there was an equally bad tackle that only received a yellow card… standard of refereeing is terrible
7.40 one Probably barnes’ worst mistake in his career
I get what the refs are trying to do but I still think it's only the internationals and matches with a camera that this is picked up. What about the armatures where there no television? How do we protect those players and also it's gone a bit too soft as well.
We want collisions and we want an entertaining game. I want to deter dirty play but you have to allow for accidents. Sometimes it's just an unfortunate collision.
I'm happy to chat about this as I don't know what's right or wrong.
I want a hard game with collisions. I also want everybody to walk away healthy.
Honestly couldn’t agree more, there needs to be protection for players but not at the expense of the game. Reds should only be for intentional or reckless foul play and add a card in the middle for 20 minutes and the player has to be replaced after times up. Punished the player without handicapping his team too much
Even though it’s a tremendously tough sport you need players to be protected.
4:04 red for who?
where's the thumbnail red card?
Isn't that Isa Nacewa? long retired
Swintons red was a joke. The ref was letting the Chiefs get away with everything at the breakdown and Jacobson was off his feet, not rolling away and was messing with the ball. Swinton grazes his shoulder on Jacobsons chin and that’s called a red card? Police the breakdown properly and this and other reds like Bundi Akis red wouldn’t happen
2:40 I didn’t see contact with head I saw shoulder to below collar
I honestly feel that so many of these look worse in slow motion and also aren’t deliberate. Somebody mentioned in the comments that if a high contact is enough for a red card then it should be a HIA. No need for HIA then just a yellow card. But what would I know. I have not played in 10 years and when I did I sucked.
One of the issues now, is that retired players are now developing early onset dementia as a result of their repeated head injuries. Steve Thomson played for the World Champions England in 2003. He cannot remember the game 20 years later. Rugby is being sued for a failure to protect players heads.
So this is what naturally must happen. Head contacts need to be policed strictly and harshly. If not, more players will suffer the consequences, and in the future would you want to risk the possibility of early on set dementia?
How is that last one a red?! The bloke grabbed the jersey of another player and pulled himself down
1:00 was a bit harsh, looked like just a head knock, unless she did something I'm missing?
Just a head knock yes, but it was caused by the defender and is extremely dangerous
@@ImKalpol Iunno seems a little off. some of these looked genuinely accidental... or maybe it's because I was a forward when playing Rugby League and tackling was my bread and butter XD
I;m not sure if an accidental clash of heads is a red card offence still? There is no malice intended, its accidental. I'm also noticing some football type theatrics creeping in to this wonderful game.
A clash of heads is indicative of a poor tackling technique
@@scottiramage317 yes but in my personal rugby playing experience clashes of heads can just happen. I have had a few eggs on the old noggin back in the day xD
Merry everything Scotti!
Because refs miss so much, if a player feels head contact, or any illegal contact, he makes a big deal of it to get the attention of the ref or TMO who will then go review the incident, usually resulting in at least a penalty, or at worst a red card. These football theatrics are a direct result of poor refereeing, and it is diminishing the sport. I've noticed many times a player receiving head contact, not making an issue and just getting on with it, and we don't see any tmo review. The refs can't see everything, so its almost like they take the attitude that if there's an issue, illegal contact or foul play, then the players will let them know by over reacting.
@Scotti Ramage exactly if you are trying to tackle a player who is mostly upright and you don't lower yourself into the tackle, then that is bad technique.
Of all the PSDT red was bullshit
Some red cards are just red, light red... And other cards are bright red, geranium, peony red...
5:25 both jumped. I don't think either was at fault.
Bit unfortunate put u cannot touch a player with both feet off the ground and they consider it dangerous hence the red card
Some of those were accidental tbh
2:07 who got red card
Tom Banks from the Brumbies
6:28 Aki arguing with the ref is just pathetic.
No one looks for a head on head accidentals, I don't think those should be reds, yellows yes but not reds. Intentional and shoulders certainly should be reds
Bundi Aki went on about it at the ref even though he was clearly in the wrong. What a thug.
Not a thug I just don't think he's very bright but in fairness it's fairly difficult to get any lower then he was
i hate these stupid reds. arm or shoulder contact on head, fine. but head to head (while upright and tackling, not using your head to clear out) is sometimes unavoidable. we are rapidly getting to a situation where every game is going to end up with 27 players and 7 or 8 tries apiece
Even though he wasn't given a red, Etzebeth's clearout of Niniashvili should be here.
2 players accident both hit pain fell hurts
Ah man, don't bring up the red roses. The most depressing game of rugby in english history.
Bundy was right! Where was he supposed to be? How do you clear someone out when they’re in that position? Seriously! If someone knows!
You can add Adam Coleman last night v Saracens to this video.
Part 2 coming soon
That was a diabolical tackle.
@linalmeemow and the easiest red card to give out this season so far
@@IRLangmaid25 Yeah, I don't think I can remember a worse one this season. The Kurt-Lee Arendse red on Beauden Barrett was just as bad I think, but not strictly this season!
Deserving or deserved ? Words have a meaning.
How the F does Aki think thats acceptable?
some of these whilst clear red cards were just poor tackle technique, however, some of them were either plain stupidity by the red carded player or just malicious
These tackles are clearly illegal, but it’s why I don’t follow soccer. Imagine Neymar getting hit by even the women. He’d be rolling around the pitch for 80 mins. Love the rugby ❤️🇮🇪🏉
In France vs SA at the 5:10 mark, who gets ejected? Because the France player hits the SA in the air but the SA player goes up and contacts the France players head?
Dupont(France) gets sent of. Both players are going for the ball, but it is the responsibility of the player who does not get the ball to protect the player that does
Rugby is challenging all the time and its not for the best from what i can see
It's red it has to be red he used his shoulder on the england player not his arms.
How are unintentional head clashes red cards? How are they even penalties?
Because it is the tacklers duty to not tackle someone high, with their own head. If you’re going to knowingly engage in a tackle, go low.
@@shaneshaneist you obviously superman, running at full speed changing your direction mid air. Also seems like a REAL good strategy to use your head. You obv did/do not play rugby. Soon you will be able to watch touch rugby, by the rate stupidity is enforced.
I get that they should be penalties and even yellow cards, but red cards for accidental or unintentional head collisions is overkill IMO.
@@Matt_Alaric How do you discourage players from going in to tackles upright if there are no serious consequences to doing it?
@@linalmeemow The consequences are penalties and yellow cards. These are discouragements, the same discouragements we use for almost every other infringement.
If these are red cards just go put tags in their shorts.
You got it. The English girl in the World Cup final came across at pace and wrapped her arms around and they accidentally clashed heads. She gets a red and the final is ruined
I'm sorry but some of these are outrageous. First things first as far as I'm concerned if a player wants to go and jump in the air to catch a ball and an opposing player is running towards it to try and catch and is looking at the ball the whole time he should not be punished for any contact, the player jumping in the air is putting themselves at risk, soon we will get to a point where opposing players will not bother even going for the ball and will ruin the game. That has to change. Also this bullsh** surrounding shoulders to the head needs to change in regards to the mitigating factors thing because they miss these factors almost 50% of the time. If a player is falling or drops their hear to initiate the contact then sorry but your own fault. You see it in this video instead of staying upright they put their head down looking for the contact it's cheating.
0:59 The officials got that one wrong. The tackle was perfectly timed, and in progress, when Woodman stopped, resulting in head-to-head contact. That should have been taken as mitigation and a yellow card awarded instead of a red. Ultimately, that mistake by the officials likely cost England the World Cup. If you watch the full replay, another identical tackle happens about 2 seconds later, where the ball carrier did not stop, and the tackle was perfectly legal.
Tackle was high all day, it is the responsibility of the tackler to be in a suitable tackle position when entering the tackle. Tackler came in upright to try wrap the ball and ball carrier, this is what lead to the head to head contact, nothing Woodman did.
The du toit one I do find hard. It is there is just no where to hit. He should have stayed out, but your job is to stop the player with the ball you need to go in. I have seen a couple like this over the last few years.
Think he got shoved in too be honest. Should have been at least a yellow for the guy who shoved him as well
Disagree. He runs in shoulder first, it's mainly stupid, similar to 2017 Sonny Bill, which was fine when laws where not as strict.
I'm talking about Thomas, too many dirty hits by South Africa to keep track off 😂
Agree he did not deserve a red at all
The last one isn't red since the player pulls himself over Bismark by grabbing 9s jersey. He is endangering himself but he did it to get Bismark sent off
I think it is an obvious one, totally reckless head first. I find the Dupont one hard to fathom; he himself was in a clear position to catch the ball until Arendse hits him feet first.
Very few of these head on head incidents would be red cards in League, where heads clashes are seen as just that. I doubt if many players aim to stop attackers with their head/face. Account should be taken of which player is actually most reasonable for contact. Defenders who are passively virtually standing still shouldn't be sent off. Union is making itself look silly, like with the refereeing of scrums.
Accidental head clashes should not be red cards.. they’re accidental
Dupont's red card is not really deserved since Kolbe jumps intentionnally and dive, he does it every time in Top14 ... Of course there's a card but I would give yellow to accidents, especially when the attacker put himself in danger (diving, kamikaze jumps etc...)
Lost my respect for Bandi Aki...
I doubt if any of these would have resulted in a penalty when I was playing in the 1970s, never mind a red card. I know that the governing bodies are worried about class action claims coming from former players, but surely bumps and bashes are all part of the game?
I bet when you were playing in the 70's you were taught to tackle low and use the players momentum to take them down. Technique is very different with contact made higher and with more force, making it more dangerous.
SA and NZ are animals
Definitely NOT the most deserving, counted at least 4 that should not even be RED. Soon they will play touch rugby and get cards for touching inappropriately.
Dupont red card is most deserved ? Are you kidding ? Did you ever playe rugby at least ?
I mean it is in the sense that getting underneath a man in the air to the point where he lands on his head is a slam dunk red, the card was 100% the correct colour and was 100% deserved. You have to get into the air if you are running onto a high ball these days. You stay on the floor you risk completely upending a bloke who does get airborne and the injuries could be life changing.
@@Fordmister OK, lets put it that way, Dupont is in position way before Kolbe, barely moving when collision happened, he clearly didn't see him as he's not trying to contest in the air. Kolbe on the other end arrived late, full speed, and he knows Dupont is here. He jumps, they collided, he fall very badly, it could have been very dangerous so its a red card, I agree, rule is the rule. but it's a red card for the result and not for the action as there is clearly, obviously, undoubtedly nothing wrong with what's Dupont did.
The point was this guy doesn't know anything about rugby, I wouldn't be surprised he's just some Indian scam...
@@marinlorre5207 I agree. I am sure that Kolbe's knee in Dupont Face is not accidental.
Some of these are so weak, and I like how some of the rugby players are beginning to exaggerate their "injury" with face holds etc.
So lemme get this straight if you do something stupid like jumping up over someone's head and then land on that person it's somehow a penalty on the guy you land on
Du Pont was never a red so not deserving. Completely accidental. I get that protection of players is important but in a game like Rugby with so much contact you will have accidental issues.
100% He's standing under the ball to catch it, gets jumped over by the attacker putting himself in a dangerous position. If you run under someone I get it, if they jump over you and you're in position to catch it, it is not your fault
lol most of these wouldn't even be penalties 20 or even 10 years ago....
Sure, and stamping on players was legal 20 - 30 years ago. Just because it's not like it was in your day, doesn't meant the game shouldn't move on...
And the brain-injured players who are going after World Rugby now, remind me when they were playing?
@@linalmeemow?
@@bok500 There are loads of players taking legal action against World Rugby for not making the game safe. Most of them were playing 10-20 years ago...
@@linalmeemow name me one
That hit by the two African players on the French lock was so shocking to see. It looks like they both just headbutt him. I'd say two red cards right there
The French player isn't a lock but a center. The worst about this red card is after the discipline commission gave the Boks player a 3-weeks suspension instead of 6, he declared he didn't understand why he was red carded.
Kolbe moves from the initial point of his tackle and you can see the other two south African players scrambling to catch up with him. They are already midair when the French player pops up and gets in the way, there's no way of stopping that. You could argue that the French player was in an offside position after the tackle has been made
Seeing as the player is off his feet, he shouldn't be on that side of the ruck
@@hounsell3679 was offside since 1/10scds. so, the sa can be late and not the french (don't forgot to talk about the sa roll)
@Hamish Banish you’re suggesting “SOUTH” Africa is civilised?? GTFOH
Players safety important but the one i disagree with is the France no 9 at 5.01 he never took his eyes off the ball and was trying to catch it himself but because of how it looked he got sent off, in mitigating circumstances the BOK player lept in and over him with his leg raised bearing in mind the number 9 is a small player this one to me was a pure accident, please dont shoot me but it is how i see it
1:07 thats just a headclash IMO, going for the ball no intent to lead with her head
I cant believe some of these red cards. Rugby is rugby.
Half of these red cards belong to the offense.
The fact that the PSDT one caused so much hullabaloo and insults to the ref is frankly shocking, That's a very clear red.
Problem is that two things can be true at once. PSDT was a bit unlucky in that he was very low, got knocked by the other Saffa, Danty was moving unpredictability, so it’s not totally his fault and didn’t seem malicious, but it’s also 100% a red card, no argument
Sports fans don’t tend to like nuance😂
This was not a clear red card watch it live and explain how can you expect a player to be sitting in a ruck
Soon rugby will be like soccer the way theyre going and these clown refs say there was no change of direction so they expect you to change direction within a split second?,they need to use common sense instead of cards sometimes
ARGENTINA CAMPEOOOOOON🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷
World rugby is at fault here. Players competing for the ball in the ruck leave only their head as target for oposition to clean out. There is no way to win your own ruck without putting yourself in a position to give away the penalty. All the law adaption and changes are not synchronized. They need to adapt the rules that players are rewarded on field for doing their job. Currently players do not know if they will receive sanction or not for doing their on field job. World rugby needs to do better
If you can't clean out the player without making contact with the head then don't clean out the player, it really is that simple.
Sounds like a comment from one of the typical fan boys who never played a game of rugby in their lives. Easy to sit on the couch and say how easy it is on the field without the ability to think for yourself.
@@RudiMyburgh-yx6eg I played for a top division club in the amateur era. We played to the laws back then, and expected to be penalised appropriately if we didn't. If you're a pro and you can't play to the laws you have no place on the field.
@@linalmeemow if that is true surely you would understand the frustration. Players compete on the ground illegally not supporting body weight. To stop them from slowing down your own ball you have to risk a penalty by entering the side or risk a penalty as the illegal player only offers his head. So what world rugby does is to penalize the head contact to ensure the game is safe. I agree the game needs to be safe but don't agree with the means. Clamp down hard on the players sealing off at ruck and illegally slowing down the game at rucks. This will make for less frustration and hence a safer game. Not only that but a more attractive game for spectators to watch. In short start treating the illness and not the symptoms
If you are scared of getting hurt. Dont play rugby.
Rugby just gone soft
No it hasn't. If World Rugby continued to allow shots to the head the sport would be litigated out of existence.
Only because the players have gotten harder :) When rugby was played by people of relatively ordinary build the risks were much lower, now even the smallest players are absolute units. Unfortunately, your brain remains just as delicate no matter how chunky you may be.
No, it's going harder year by year partly because players are stronger and heavier. Nowadays some backs could have easily played in the front eight 20 or 30 years ago. And IMHO if nothing is done there will be deaths on the fields.
Rugby has become a game for pretty gym boys.... It's supposed to be ruthless as it is a contact sport as most of the "so-called" red cards are in actual fact collisions....World rugby (Northern hemisphere) is a bunch of fools run by book makers!
Stupid comment. Law changes have been made because of the litigation from players who've got brain damage from repeated head trauma. If World Rugby didn't act the game would be litigated out of existence.
@@linalmeemow Strange how everyone is jumping on the lawsuit bandwagon.... started by northern hemisphere ex-players... and yes its a contact sport.... did you even watch this video? Many of the contact are in actual fact collisions, which was part and. parcel of the game for years, even back in the day when I played for UCT... If sportsmen wish to partake low-risk sport, please stay away from rugby. Period.
@@DavidLTJ Collisions caused by rubbish tackle technique. You're really suggesting brain damaged players are jumping on the bandwagon? And I thought your *first* comment was stupid...
@@linalmeemow Insulting me doesn't change the truth. Go ahead, buddy. Have a blast!
@@DavidLTJ I'm not insulting you, just the things you're saying as they're incredibly foolish.