Fascinating insight into a page of 'scientific discovery' and its history. Thank you for this insightful commentary. There are so many female, unsung and unrecognized hero's of history, that should be taught in school. Definitely, we still live in a very much, perhaps too much, male-dominated world. We need to give the human race, half of the human race, role models to emulate and follow!
You have a good sentiment, but I dont think it was worded as nicely. We don't need to give people role models to follow, we need to stop erasing history for political and personal beliefs.
That's a lie. Gosling was her student and they both worked on the image which had an exposure of over 60 hours so it was not exactly a snapshot! She published jointly with Gosling. She never minimized nor denied his contribution, and he never claimed she did either.
@Richard-hv5hh wrong. Her male PhD student took the photo and she presented it to James Watson and Maurice Wilkins who at the time were working on a diagram of DNA. The photo was helpful as it helped discover the nuclei were located on the outside of the fibres not the inside, but she did not take the photo.
@PMCFrontLines Wrong again. Both Rosalind and Gosling are credited with the photo everywhere. It was Gosling who showed the photo to Wilkins. Rosalind had asked him to do that.
Thanks for the explanation. I've been lectured on DNA structure so many times but never understood how the picture showed DNA structure until now
Fascinating insight into a page of 'scientific discovery' and its history. Thank you for this insightful commentary. There are so many female, unsung and unrecognized hero's of history, that should be taught in school. Definitely, we still live in a very much, perhaps too much, male-dominated world. We need to give the human race, half of the human race, role models to emulate and follow!
You have a good sentiment, but I dont think it was worded as nicely. We don't need to give people role models to follow, we need to stop erasing history for political and personal beliefs.
As a 65 year veteran of the written word l stand by what l said and how l worded it!
I love this, thank you for the explanation!
Finalmente encontrai alguém explicando essa foto!
thanks for the explain my instructor told us the story of the poor rosalin it make me cry
me too
Me too.
No one asked 😄👍
NOOOOOOOOO
@@dr.domingouez3856 What? Did your dad die?
Thank you so much
Asch conformity experiment?
Rosalind Franklin did not take the photo even. She stole credit off it from her male PhD student Raymond Gosling.
That's a lie. Gosling was her student and they both worked on the image which had an exposure of over 60 hours so it was not exactly a snapshot!
She published jointly with Gosling. She never minimized nor denied his contribution, and he never claimed she did either.
@Richard-hv5hh wrong. Her male PhD student took the photo and she presented it to James Watson and Maurice Wilkins who at the time were working on a diagram of DNA. The photo was helpful as it helped discover the nuclei were located on the outside of the fibres not the inside, but she did not take the photo.
@PMCFrontLines Wrong again. Both Rosalind and Gosling are credited with the photo everywhere. It was Gosling who showed the photo to Wilkins. Rosalind had asked him to do that.
I knew Rosalind, by the way.
@@Richard-hv5hh ruclips.net/video/j9Yn3i-DMKw/видео.html
Nope. That is debunked in this video.
7 your dad
NO one asked 😈
9
11