A Call for a New NSC-68 and Goldwater Nichols Reform

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 янв 2025

Комментарии • 6

  • @Kim-is-here-j9o
    @Kim-is-here-j9o 6 дней назад

    I have missed these informative episodes. I'm going to pray to Saint Agnes, and then give this my full attention. Thank you and with respect for everything this organization does to keep listeners informed.

  • @AtmoPierce
    @AtmoPierce 5 дней назад

    The DoD is ahead of SV in R&D for many significant technologies. The initial rationale is flawed.

  • @Adept893
    @Adept893 6 дней назад

    43:38 hope someone reads this shit...
    Anyway 'JPO' office I hope is do something like a deobfiscation later. Meant to reduce duplication 'aka, cost' is procurement. If it did nothing else than encourage the growth of Open Architecture then we should should herald its benefits.
    If I may boldly state an opinion as a neophyte; What it seems everyone wants is the ability to prototype at scale and then test, refine, evaluate (at scale) and the decide. With failure being a respected outcome. Full stop. As in not congressional hearing and career backlash. And at the end of the day rain or shine. For industry to retain, workforce/business solvency acrosss a broad 'infrastructure' base.
    This costs money/access to ready and available capital. Not connected to 'high yield' (flighty) capital.
    As discussed earlier a capital fund for aero/space procurement will enhance industrial base survival.

  • @Samanbeachhikkaduwa
    @Samanbeachhikkaduwa 5 дней назад

    🙋‍♂️🤳🎵🌐

  • @AhmedDjeddou
    @AhmedDjeddou 6 дней назад

    The White House Washington DjeddouAhmed WhiteHouse 🌏