Manila Dialogue on the South China Sea: Understanding Recent Threats to the Rule of Law in the SCS
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2024
- The Philippines hosts the Manila Dialogue on the South China Sea on Friday, November 8. The fourth panel features experts who will review incidents in the South China Sea to generate insights into the root causes of the heightening tensions and evaluate how these incidents have gradually threatened the rule of law in the area. The session will also explore actionable recommendations to prevent further escalation and discourage coercion and use of force.
www.rappler.co...
Thanks, Mr. Powell. The situation you described is very clear.
Don’t agree on China ,
Let’s follow what’s the unclos says.
No to china
YES NO TO CHINA! CHINA IS VIOLATOR OF THE UNCLOS
Seems the representative of China having difficulties to explain and defends their claims 9 dust line.
Sec. Gibo is very articulate and candid person.
Excellent
Dialogue should be limited only to countries involved.
I simply can't understand the person talking now. I know it's english but it's painfully disgusting!
Mr. Do is a vietnamese. It's inate for vietnamese tongue to pronounce letter "L" as "N". Like "tool" will become "toon". On the other hand, Japanese pronounce "L" as "R", Chinese pronounce "R" as "L", and Filipinos having difficulty with "F", as we pronounce it as "P".
Correct 😊😊😊
As long as the chinese accupy the west Philippines sea exclusive economic zones the desputed they have no solution at all because Philippines never give up their onw teretorial sea
Mr Hu is difficult for china becase of greedyness ...follow the law of the sea internationally then we have peaceful solution
The facts that those disputed islands are closer to philippines that's belong to our territory,..we don't recognized china laws
...it"s difficult for me to understand the current speaker (with the name plate infront of him showing "Hu"). What is his bottom line?
The facts that you don't understand the speaker name plate, it's now cleared that the disputed islands are not belongs to them,...😅😊😂
Point of views
Looking back during the administration of late Pres. Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. In middle 60's to middle 8O's wherein there was already presence of American base in Subic Bay. Notably there were no Chinese vessels doing harrassment or bullying Filipino Fishermen in West Philippine Sea, because it was then fully controlled in those days by Patrolling Phil. Navy and Phil. Coast Guard, as well as supported by Phil. Air Force in the Air Space Territory.
Chinese navy are not that capable during that time. The Philippines neglected the modernization 30yrs ago. 'til to this day. Same old trapo politicos.
All this arguments is futile in the part of china. It's okay now, tomorrow not anymore. This is china😅😅😅
Wow powel i salute american goverment..
WPS...
The archives going from the 1880s until the late 1970s demonstrate that it is the view of the British and French legal experts that as a matter of the international law territory, the Xisha Islands and the Nansha Islands are Chinese territory. That is to say, the Chinese claims and activities on the islands far exceeded in intensity of those of any other country during the period, except for the French, whose own lawyers challenged the actions of France, which, in any case, subsequently withdrew.
The most important French foreign minister of the inter-war period Aristide Briand, who was foreign minister most of the time between 1918 and his death in 1932, took the view that the Xisha Islands were clearly Chinese. And he consulted with the independent Jurisconsult of the Foreign Ministry, Jules Basdevant, subsequently a French judge on the International Court of Justice. The latter wrote that according to the Island of Palmas case, the Xisha Islands were recognized as Chinese. Subsequently, French legal advice was that France never completed an effective occupation of the Spratlys [the Nansha Islands], and they abandoned them completely in 1956. In the 1930s they recognized that these Spratlys [the Nansha Islands] had always been home to Chinese fisherman from Hainan Island and Guangdong. There had never been any Vietnamese or Philippine connection and French interference had only been in its own name and not that of Vietnam. It is the British who then drew a decisive conclusion, from all the French and British records available, that the Chinese were the owners of the Spratlys [the Nansha Islands], a legal position certified as part of British Cabinet records in 1974.
Reference: “The rule of law says that the islands are Chinese”
Of course, that's what Anthony Carty would say, when interviewed by the Global Times. Mr. Carty is of course, a legal scholar at the Beijing Institute of Technology, and former law professor at Tsinghua University.
Imagine that, the Chinese government who have been claiming that the South China Sea has been Chinese territory since ancient times, do not have that information. The judges of the Arbitral Tribunal who ruled in favor of the Philippines do not have that information. All the brilliant minds who researched the South China Sea conflict did not find that information. Alas, Mr. Carty was interviewed by Global Times recently, and this one single brilliant mind, through his diligent efforts, found those archives!
Nice work of fiction.
😅😂😅😂
For additional information, in 2014, the philippines passed 247 maps in arbitration to support the case against china teritorial expansionsm. And that 247 maps proved that no one in the map even before during colonial time that china control the entire south china sea. PERIOD
Haaay!! I DONT understand he cant speak English well😏😏sign off