almost every single time in the past few years spurs beat liverpool only through a ref obvious mistake i just want them to win cleanly for once anyway they will be crushed in the second leg so it doesn't matter that much
Gab: let's start the show by talking about Tottenham. Was Bergvall lucky to stay on the pitch? Rob: Yes he was. Gab: Right, now let's spend the rest of the show talking about Liverpool. 😂😂
Why are people going on endlessly about the Bergvall card? It should have been a yellow, his actual yellow should have been only a free-kick: therefore no Red. Next problem?
Handling it the right way?? 😂😂 leave it to carra the clown The only reason that stopping VVD to do any clear reaction because he is the captain & the main time VVD agent offered him to Real Madrid & they refused 😂😂 literally SALAH is more loyal to Liverpool than Carra
Regardless if the first yellow was a yellow or not….the guy was on a yellow card and should have been sent off. Minimum the game should have stopped, if the foul left Liverpool on 10 men. That’s the only real harshness. But that’s football life. We crack on and see how we do at anfield.
Wrong. Justice was done in the end even though we might not like the way it was done. If the yellow shouldn't have been given but it stayed, we should also be comfortable with a yellow that should have been given but was not. Yellow cards should be rescinded immediately upon review because it could potentially lead to a red
@@RAJ-Jamcalnot how it works, theres plenty of games where the same situation occurs and the player still gets a second yellow. This game was the exception so its completely fair to say that he shouldve been sent off.
you cant have it both ways...you cant say "Regardless if the first yellow was a yellow or not….the guy was on a yellow card and should have been sent off. " and then get mad the ref did not give a 2nd yellow.
@@RAJ-Jamcal you talking so much shite. You are saying it's alright to use a wrong to correct a wrong. Doesn't matter if he made a mistake with the first yellow. Or the first yellow in his life, it's still the wrong decision and your parroting is not going to make it any more right.
I don't understand why these pundits are only focusing on potential second yellow but not the first, which was erroneously issued. In both cases, the decision was wrong. These pudits are no better than the average fan who occasionally watches football.🤦♂️🤦♀️🤦
As a viewer from abroad, it seems to me the referees is told to make up their own rules when referring Liverpool by Howard webb.
almost every single time in the past few years spurs beat liverpool only through a ref obvious mistake i just want them to win cleanly for once anyway they will be crushed in the second leg so it doesn't matter that much
Do you even check stats ?? check first, then come back and correct yourself here.
Yeah like how hand ball during championsleague? Jota not being sent off?
You sound like everyone else repeating the same lies that the media is saying, but the first yellow WAS NOT A FOUL
Also Tsimikas should have been sent off
Gab: let's start the show by talking about Tottenham. Was Bergvall lucky to stay on the pitch? Rob: Yes he was. Gab: Right, now let's spend the rest of the show talking about Liverpool. 😂😂
Why are people going on endlessly about the Bergvall card? It should have been a yellow, his actual yellow should have been only a free-kick: therefore no Red.
Next problem?
The first one wasn't a yellow card so stop yapping Man 😂
Doesn't mean you continue the game when there is a fool leading to goal
Irrelevant.
@@kiranbarrow4648what?? The foul was when Liverpool went forward - it wasn't in the same play as the goal!
Kudos to the referee
For being fair 🎉 🏐
Don't know who is this other guy, but I'm impressed
No one talking about Tsimikas studs in the leg - straight red
Yeah, only you.
Spurs can get a result at Anfield 🏐
The only reason people are talking about this is because he scored the winning goal.
Bergvall should be arrested for this 2nd tackle not just a red card but the ref didn’t even give a foul 😂😂
the liverpool cb made an even worse tackle and didnt get a yellow when it should have been a straight red..
I don't think there is a right way for players to react to their contract situations in public. Surely a lot depends on their personality!
Love from AFRICA
Playing advantage and not going back to punish is ridiculous.
cry
@@muzikkification Grow up what are you even talking about I'm clearly not a Liverpool fan...
Are you having a laugh Liverpool the first booking the Liverpool player was cheating all day long he should've been booked for cheating or sent off
Gab is always hating on African players
Why the 1st challenge wasn't a yellow?
It was yellow and regardless.
@@prabalhno, it should not have been. There was no contact
Handling it the right way?? 😂😂 leave it to carra the clown The only reason that stopping VVD to do any clear reaction because he is the captain & the main time VVD agent offered him to Real Madrid & they refused 😂😂 literally SALAH is more loyal to Liverpool than Carra
Lucky ??? It was just cheating yet again !! Idiots those referees
the first yellow card should NEVER have been given , so quit your bitching steve nicol and get on with your life
They know your engagement gets the views even when they know they talking BS. That's all they really care about. (I just contributed to it)
Agreed.
Why it wasn't a yellow?
@rebelwithacause8735 Because Begvall never touched Diaz. Diaz took a dive.
@@iu2 you don't have to make contact for it to be reckless, you know.
Regardless if the first yellow was a yellow or not….the guy was on a yellow card and should have been sent off. Minimum the game should have stopped, if the foul left Liverpool on 10 men. That’s the only real harshness. But that’s football life. We crack on and see how we do at anfield.
Wrong. Justice was done in the end even though we might not like the way it was done.
If the yellow shouldn't have been given but it stayed, we should also be comfortable with a yellow that should have been given but was not.
Yellow cards should be rescinded immediately upon review because it could potentially lead to a red
@ it’s all good. We disagree. But that’s footy
@@RAJ-Jamcalnot how it works, theres plenty of games where the same situation occurs and the player still gets a second yellow. This game was the exception so its completely fair to say that he shouldve been sent off.
you cant have it both ways...you cant say "Regardless if the first yellow was a yellow or not….the guy was on a yellow card and should have been sent off. " and then get mad the ref did not give a 2nd yellow.
@@RAJ-Jamcal you talking so much shite. You are saying it's alright to use a wrong to correct a wrong. Doesn't matter if he made a mistake with the first yellow. Or the first yellow in his life, it's still the wrong decision and your parroting is not going to make it any more right.
I don't understand why these pundits are only focusing on potential second yellow but not the first, which was erroneously issued. In both cases, the decision was wrong. These pudits are no better than the average fan who occasionally watches football.🤦♂️🤦♀️🤦
cry more liverpool