Note: submarines are highly unlikely to be following a SAG. They're much more likely to be ahead of you to lay in ambush. Chasing means moving relatively quickly which = noise. A submarine ahead of you can move extremely slowly and stay quiet. Not an impossible scenario as a sub may be shadowing the group to pass positional information to other forces. However, a submarine attack is more likely from either beam of your expected path, in this scenario, more likely from the seaward side as Soviet subs would be wary of Norwegian diesel/electric subs on the land ward side.
Thanks for posting these videos! As you say, the attention to detail is impressive, but I noticed that they've depicted Vandegrift (FFG 48) as a short-hulled Perry class rather than the long-hulled version. The difference is not just aesthetic, since the long-hulled ships had better helicopters (Seahawks) and a towed array sonar. Based on what we've seen so far, I'm hopeful that the developer will fix in the final version or future patches.
Yeah that needs fixed. I was on the (Nicholas FFG 47) and it had both countermeasure and towed system spaces/ports, so I figured the Vandergrift did, too. It was stationed on the other end of the country so I never saw it, but I'm certain it had both of those systems for its (relatively) meager defenses. It should have also had a pair of Mk 38's port and starboard aft main deck, along with other small caliber weapons on mounts.
We're aware of it and will get to it once we get around to adding the Seahawk. I still need to fix all the hull numbers on the OHPs to use the correct font too.
@@georgea5991 Ha! I was aboard Nicholas for a month in the summer of '93, and later served on Kauffman (FFG 59) from '01-03. You're correct that Vandegrift would have had both the towed array and decoy ports in the stern. But the Mk 38s might not have been fitted during the Cold War era.
@@julhelm1821 Great! Thanks for confirming. As I mentioned in my original post, based on the great work we're seeing so far, I can tell how much effort and attention you all have put into the game. Really appreciate your response.
@@julhelm1821 Just wanted to make you aware that I am VERY excited for this game to come out, this is such a great looking game, the attention to detail, and passion for the work is rather easy to see in the gameplay I have seen so far
this is definatly the type of naval game ive been waiting for. the freedom you get in the formation editor, the IFF system, the Cold war/modern setting especially. Im going to be spending hours on this game.
The only thing missing from the helo launch on the Perry class is the flight deck nets, aft flag staff and the 4x aft HF whip aerials lowering. So looking forward to playing this, spent 12 months posted to HMAS Adelaide (Perry class) in the Royal Australian Navy
That second harpoon on the last missile boat hit right on the ASM launchers. That ship would have been utterly disintegrated IRL. The fireball would have visible for miles.
@@albertopus I doubt it’s due to a bug. The missile boat was obviously destroyed in game, but I doubt the game engine is designed to model a real catastrophic kill when a ship’s missiles explode.
So im not in the navy im in the army so i don’t know much about sea combat but wouldn’t u want to keep your units close to each other so there in each others protection bubbles?
@@antilarge7860 SM-6? Those didn't come around until 2013--hell, the only Perry's to even get SM-2 compatibility were Australia's, and they only got around to that upgrade in the late 2000s--and this is a Cold War scenario, which means the crummy old SM-1 is the best a Perry can offer against aerial threats. And would you look at that, that's the missile the game models it as having, shocker.
@@antilarge7860 Uhhh Real life buddy we got US Destroyers engaging drones and missiles barely a couple miles away in 2023-2024... And Thats a target that they detected since it's launch
And really, VLS doesn't provide that much of a fire rate increase. What it does, however, is by being more compact, allows a ship to carry much more missiles.
Been watching a lot of these videos from you and others the last few days and one thing i've been really surprised with is the visual detail, there were moments when you could see the explosions of the missiles in the distance and just they way they were reflected looked fantastic, then add on the damage detail as well it just all looks good.
@@VulcanHDGaming It reminds me of the formation editor from the old Battlestations Midway/Pacific games, they had a similar click and drag formation system.
Great to see a more complicated scenario than what the other folks who've gotten early early access have been showing. No experience with simming modern navel OPs so it's very interesting to see how you setup the helicopter screen etc. Can't wait for release, game seems excellent.
I can't recommend P Gatcomb's channel enough -- He's a Command Modern Operations expert, and I believe that game also played a huge inspiration to sea power. He has excellent videos explaining ASW strategy, and and general modern naval combat tactics. There is an emphasis on longevity in naval combat, i.e. holding some helo's in reserve to prolong your combat effectiveness.
There was a game once - Dangerous Waters. It was pretty much the same, though it looked not even remotely that good as Sea Power. But I do remember spending hours on trying to find single sub with several helicopters. So much fun... though I never really won ;-P
Great video again, this game looks absolutely fantastic. I've been waiting for a decent modern naval game that's accessible for a very long time and this looks like the one I've been waiting for.
Man, i wish we could have this game but with dynamic campaigns where we A) fight with a single fleet where we upgrade and build more ships for or B) control an entire campaign theater with multiple ships like victory at sea pacific. A mixture of these would be cool too!
Do you think we'll get to see empty shells ejecting from the ships main gun? I know the US Navy one has a frontal ejection port off to the side of the barrel and it would be really cool to see the autoloader spit out shells, its a small detail so its not as important, seeing the helicopter garage and arm launchers all working is awesome too!
@@amerislav7627 i guess my experiences is with bigger birds (sea kings) off of frigates.. we needed some wind across the deck to help lift on launch/ recover
@@julhelm1821 Love seeing the engagement on all these video comment threads! Pretty confident you guys will continue to improve this, WTH the help of a respectfully engaged community. I rarely buy games right out of the gate, but this will surely be an exception.
Don’t know if the game allows you to but shoot harpoons in pairs one with top down mode active the other with it disabled so the enemy’s anti missile Defense has to stretch out to hit both.
So the thing about LAMPS sonobuoys is that they're not really useful for sowing a barrier. They're usually for prosecuting and localizing a contact picked up by their host ship's sonar.
There is an extensive list of ships, planes and helos they modeled in the game, including many soviet ones. ENIGMA made a video showing all the units in the game.
@@skyeranger to eleborate my comment further i specificly ment nato vessels and yes i know the Video you suggest that is what my comment of a Lack of non us ships comes from
@@justforthelol2771 Dev has mentioned elsewhere their intention to add stuff post-release. Also includes mod support so expect to see plenty of growth there.
Weird! The Seasprite helicopters take off with the flight deck side netting in the up configuration? With rear flag mast still up? Severe flight safety hazard! Heresy!!! 😜
I have a question From what I've seen, in game weapon control orders are different to those in real life Weapons Tight in game acts like Weapons Hold IRL, only open fire if attacked, or if been ordered to And Weapons Free IRL allows to attack anything not identified as friendly, but in game it works like Weapons Tight, allows to attack anything identified as enemy Does Weapons Hold in game makes AI not use weapons at all, even if there is missile coming at it? Maybe I'm wrong, I would be glad to get some clarification about that, thanks
in some other videos, it seems that the ships dont fire interceptors even on weapons tight, but other times they do? i think there might be a different menu for allowing self defense or something
It does seem that we got the terminology wrong. The current system is somewhat inadequate (affects all weapons on the platform) and we are looking to make it a lot more useful.
There really is no need to emit radio waves since it will give out your location. I don’t know if the scenario is affected by them. In this scenario you could relay on Mk-II eyeballs and periodically use the radar on the helicopters.
Might be nitpicky but that AS-7 (Kh-23) hitting your ship should have missed. As far as I know those missiles aren't inertially or otherwise stabilized in their flight path and need to be continuously guided manually by the pilot. Since you've shot down the MiG-23 guiding it several seconds before the impact, that missile should have nose dived into the water I think.
the missile is guided through beam riding, but if I remember right the pod providing the beam mounted aboard the MiG does have genuine stabilization so the MiG losing stability wouldn't prevent it from flying straight so long as the target was within the pod's angle limits. still, you can see in the video the Kh-23 appears to be actively tracking the target rather than simply flying straight, which would be impossible without continued input from the pilot
It's something the team is aware of, but it's not currently possible to move those windows outside of the game. they are styled to look like the windows we are familiar with
@@UGBtactical It would be so cool to have. My favorite feature I've seen so far is the hanger animations. I've always wanted an rts game that really focuses on the small details. This is going to be my game of the year for me. is there a Q& anywhere out right now that you know of?
I really wanna see PvP for this game, been playing a lot of nebulous recently (basically asymmetric naval warfare in space) and the depth of something like this seems insanely fun for a slow PvP game
Seems like a lot of micromanagement. It wouldn't be so bad if you only controlled a single vessel like in CW but it seems like it could become very hairy to manage pretty quickly. Looks beautiful though.
I’ve been waiting for this game for so long without hearing anything I was starting to think it had been abandoned. Now there is more gameplay out than I can handle. Can’t wait for this one.
those missile launchers are cool, but damn are they slow to actually fire. Feel like ships with those single launcher systems are gonna be really frustrating when it comes to fast reaction stuff like low flying jets
@Angel33Demon666 System. Which isn't plural in case you were unaware. Hence, VLS systems. They have opted for VLS systems. As there are many VLS options to select from. Didn't expect to have to teach someone basic English today, but you're welcome
Is the U.S. flag correct? I swear every time we get a decent look at it, it looks like a 48-star flag. Unless the scenario takes place before July 4, 1960, it should be the 50-star flag
Why immediately activate air search radars? In all the recent streams I've been seeing, i have a feeling that people don't understand that emitting immediately equals being spotted
Great to see the game but it's sometimes painful watching bros reaction time. Not saying I won't watch more but my guy took so many risks with the Perry cruiser I thought for sure they were gonna wreck it. We won't even talk about the helis.
When you are being attacked, turn off weapons tight and go to weapons free. I have seen every youtuber who has showcased this game lose ships simply because they choose either not to react in a timely manner, or because they don't know that their ships won't react with weapons tight until the last second. It gets quite aggravating to watch.
Weapons free wastes missiles, and in this case I was just unlucky my Standards didn't get the job done. :( I possibly could have made the Knox class weapons free, but definitely not the OHP
If DEVs are looking at comments on your page, just a small point… You mentioned… gushed about the attention to detail, however the moon and sun were up, but the moon wasn’t “lit” correctly from the sun. Was lit like the sun was in a different place. Little things like this all add up to subconsciously ruin the emersion the rest of the awesome detail was creating.
This is about the fifth video I have seen on this game and I have not yet once seen the player lose. Is this possible, because if not the game is either unbalanced or has crap AI. I want to like this game, but so far it just looks like shooting fish in a barrel.
@rags417 Most scenarios are set up to be easy at the moment but there are a few much more difficult. That being said most people who have their hands on the game are very good.
Note: submarines are highly unlikely to be following a SAG. They're much more likely to be ahead of you to lay in ambush. Chasing means moving relatively quickly which = noise. A submarine ahead of you can move extremely slowly and stay quiet.
Not an impossible scenario as a sub may be shadowing the group to pass positional information to other forces. However, a submarine attack is more likely from either beam of your expected path, in this scenario, more likely from the seaward side as Soviet subs would be wary of Norwegian diesel/electric subs on the land ward side.
Plus, the second the player went active, he gave them a very good idea of where to hunt for his SAG.
Great video! I agree the attention to detail is amazing
Thanks for posting these videos! As you say, the attention to detail is impressive, but I noticed that they've depicted Vandegrift (FFG 48) as a short-hulled Perry class rather than the long-hulled version. The difference is not just aesthetic, since the long-hulled ships had better helicopters (Seahawks) and a towed array sonar. Based on what we've seen so far, I'm hopeful that the developer will fix in the final version or future patches.
Yeah that needs fixed. I was on the (Nicholas FFG 47) and it had both countermeasure and towed system spaces/ports, so I figured the Vandergrift did, too. It was stationed on the other end of the country so I never saw it, but I'm certain it had both of those systems for its (relatively) meager defenses. It should have also had a pair of Mk 38's port and starboard aft main deck, along with other small caliber weapons on mounts.
We're aware of it and will get to it once we get around to adding the Seahawk. I still need to fix all the hull numbers on the OHPs to use the correct font too.
@@georgea5991 Ha! I was aboard Nicholas for a month in the summer of '93, and later served on Kauffman (FFG 59) from '01-03. You're correct that Vandegrift would have had both the towed array and decoy ports in the stern. But the Mk 38s might not have been fitted during the Cold War era.
@@julhelm1821 Great! Thanks for confirming. As I mentioned in my original post, based on the great work we're seeing so far, I can tell how much effort and attention you all have put into the game. Really appreciate your response.
@@julhelm1821 Just wanted to make you aware that I am VERY excited for this game to come out, this is such a great looking game, the attention to detail, and passion for the work is rather easy to see in the gameplay I have seen so far
this is definatly the type of naval game ive been waiting for. the freedom you get in the formation editor, the IFF system, the Cold war/modern setting especially. Im going to be spending hours on this game.
These next two months are going to feel like the last four years
TWO MONTHS! I want it now
Dog
For real
The only thing missing from the helo launch on the Perry class is the flight deck nets, aft flag staff and the 4x aft HF whip aerials lowering. So looking forward to playing this, spent 12 months posted to HMAS Adelaide (Perry class) in the Royal Australian Navy
The ohp/knox combo was one of the classic learning scenarios vs osas in the Harpoon miniatures game back in the day. Nostalgia!
That second harpoon on the last missile boat hit right on the ASM launchers. That ship would have been utterly disintegrated IRL. The fireball would have visible for miles.
I think there was a bug in the current version that makes some ships nigh invulnerable
@@albertopus
I doubt it’s due to a bug. The missile boat was obviously destroyed in game, but I doubt the game engine is designed to model a real catastrophic kill when a ship’s missiles explode.
So im not in the navy im in the army so i don’t know much about sea combat but wouldn’t u want to keep your units close to each other so there in each others protection bubbles?
@@samson321anderson
“Close” is a relative term in naval combat. A battlegroup is going to have hundred of yards between ships most of the time.
@@thomastrinkle2294 well yea 😂 I mean like close enough to be in each others protective envelope
I can see why the Navy eventually went gaga for VLS and put it on everything!
I stopped watching after the SM6 failed to hit those migs. In what reality would those migs get into firing range to begin with?
@@antilarge7860 SM-6? Those didn't come around until 2013--hell, the only Perry's to even get SM-2 compatibility were Australia's, and they only got around to that upgrade in the late 2000s--and this is a Cold War scenario, which means the crummy old SM-1 is the best a Perry can offer against aerial threats. And would you look at that, that's the missile the game models it as having, shocker.
@@antilarge7860 Uhhh Real life buddy we got US Destroyers engaging drones and missiles barely a couple miles away in 2023-2024... And Thats a target that they detected since it's launch
@antilarge7860 This mission is in 1984 dude. Those are SM1s off a Hazard Perry. Not exactly a Gucci sm6 off a burke
And really, VLS doesn't provide that much of a fire rate increase. What it does, however, is by being more compact, allows a ship to carry much more missiles.
I love the missile reloading animations. Can't wait for this.
Been watching a lot of these videos from you and others the last few days and one thing i've been really surprised with is the visual detail, there were moments when you could see the explosions of the missiles in the distance and just they way they were reflected looked fantastic, then add on the damage detail as well it just all looks good.
Yeah they've really done a great job with the graphical fidelity in the distance as well as up close!
Instant buy right there. Wishlisted and looking forward, I will end the year around intense combats like this one.
My jaw drapped when you opened the edit formation tab :D This game looks incredible. Even in this stage of development. 👏👏
I agree, it's a very useful feature!
@@VulcanHDGaming It reminds me of the formation editor from the old Battlestations Midway/Pacific games, they had a similar click and drag formation system.
Just alone the attention to detail for pulling a helicopter out of a ship hanger to name one thing only. I so can't wait for this incredible sim game!
PvE coop would be so much fun with a couple friends...
PvE beat male.... PvP or NOTHING for alpha chads
@@EricDKaufman PvP is for virgin tryhard kiddies, PvE is for chill bros. Same way kids play CSGO, men play Arma3.
@@Powerhaus88 exactly brother
@@Powerhaus88 real
@@Powerhaus88🎉🎉😂
so stoked for this game to release. looking polished already and they still have 2 months to cook. lets friggin go!
Great to see a more complicated scenario than what the other folks who've gotten early early access have been showing. No experience with simming modern navel OPs so it's very interesting to see how you setup the helicopter screen etc. Can't wait for release, game seems excellent.
Mig 23 is peak cold war aesthetic if you ask me
I can't recommend P Gatcomb's channel enough -- He's a Command Modern Operations expert, and I believe that game also played a huge inspiration to sea power. He has excellent videos explaining ASW strategy, and and general modern naval combat tactics. There is an emphasis on longevity in naval combat, i.e. holding some helo's in reserve to prolong your combat effectiveness.
LOL so you DO recommend it.
I NEED this game. This is actually what brought me to your channel. Looking for as much footage as I can get.
it would be nice to add AWACs to this scenario to monitor land and air enemy forces.
There was a game once - Dangerous Waters. It was pretty much the same, though it looked not even remotely that good as Sea Power. But I do remember spending hours on trying to find single sub with several helicopters. So much fun... though I never really won ;-P
Great video again, this game looks absolutely fantastic. I've been waiting for a decent modern naval game that's accessible for a very long time and this looks like the one I've been waiting for.
I really hope this game does well! Been waiting awhile for this one. Great gameplay footage! Thanks for sharing
I was going to say, this game should be worth 3 years of waiting.
Man, i wish we could have this game but with dynamic campaigns where we A) fight with a single fleet where we upgrade and build more ships for or B) control an entire campaign theater with multiple ships like victory at sea pacific. A mixture of these would be cool too!
@7:51 that was not the sound of the radar playing, but all the whales in the area crying out in bloody pain.
Ah - a 21st century upgrade of Harpoon! A game I played a LOT back in the day. Roll on November :)
Do you think we'll get to see empty shells ejecting from the ships main gun? I know the US Navy one has a frontal ejection port off to the side of the barrel and it would be really cool to see the autoloader spit out shells, its a small detail so its not as important, seeing the helicopter garage and arm launchers all working is awesome too!
I had a double take when i seen those signal flags haha
I like your reaction to those cooool detail this game have, just like we are still kid amaze by those stuff😆
I expected this game to be Cold Waters 2, but man they really went way further than what I thought
This looks really great so far. I am going to wishlist this tonight.
Love this! More please.
Attention to detail is neat but they missed lowering the deck edge safety netting on the Vandy during helo ops.
Also do the ships need to be on flying courses for launch/ recovery?
@@Themaritimes99 Helpful but not necessary since you’re launching/landing with a ship’s superstructure in the way.
@@amerislav7627 i guess my experiences is with bigger birds (sea kings) off of frigates.. we needed some wind across the deck to help lift on launch/ recover
That's been fixed now. Thanks for pointing it out!
@@julhelm1821 Love seeing the engagement on all these video comment threads! Pretty confident you guys will continue to improve this, WTH the help of a respectfully engaged community. I rarely buy games right out of the gate, but this will surely be an exception.
Don’t know if the game allows you to but shoot harpoons in pairs one with top down mode active the other with it disabled so the enemy’s anti missile Defense has to stretch out to hit both.
This reminds me so much of Jane's Fleet Command!
I can just imagine what the defensive fire is going to look like versus an alpha strike of A-6s/7s/Prowlers firing Harpoons, SLAMs, HARMs, etc...
This was almost like an interactive movie.
So the thing about LAMPS sonobuoys is that they're not really useful for sowing a barrier. They're usually for prosecuting and localizing a contact picked up by their host ship's sonar.
I cant wait for this to come out! I only hope the AI is good at its job. It looks great.
Love the video. Hope to see more of this game in the future.
Liking this series, waited since Harpoon2 for a game like this.
Happy to see sailors on the deck!
I hope we will see more non US ships in the full version espacialy with there attention to detail as you mentioned
There is an extensive list of ships, planes and helos they modeled in the game, including many soviet ones. ENIGMA made a video showing all the units in the game.
@@skyeranger to eleborate my comment further i specificly ment nato vessels and yes i know the Video you suggest that is what my comment of a Lack of non us ships comes from
@@justforthelol2771 Dev has mentioned elsewhere their intention to add stuff post-release. Also includes mod support so expect to see plenty of growth there.
"Attention to detail"
00:17 - no splash as booster falls into sea
Literally unplayable.
9/10 IGN
@@bimmerbomber2002 These devs don't have the budget to buy a 9/10 on IGN.
Seriously hope there’s an implied “/s” here.
Weird! The Seasprite helicopters take off with the flight deck side netting in the up configuration? With rear flag mast still up? Severe flight safety hazard! Heresy!!! 😜
You should have turned your OHP
CWIS is on the back of the superstructure, better field of view for it etc
Will there be more flashed out UI and weather effects in the final game?
It looks great especially the level of small details.
I need this game like yesterday
Loving the Sea Power videos! Is it November yet? 🤣
Target the lifeboats. Can you pick up any downed fliers
Is it possible to control whether the Harpoons pop up or skim?
I have a question
From what I've seen, in game weapon control orders are different to those in real life
Weapons Tight in game acts like Weapons Hold IRL, only open fire if attacked, or if been ordered to
And Weapons Free IRL allows to attack anything not identified as friendly, but in game it works like Weapons Tight, allows to attack anything identified as enemy
Does Weapons Hold in game makes AI not use weapons at all, even if there is missile coming at it?
Maybe I'm wrong, I would be glad to get some clarification about that, thanks
in some other videos, it seems that the ships dont fire interceptors even on weapons tight, but other times they do? i think there might be a different menu for allowing self defense or something
It does seem that we got the terminology wrong. The current system is somewhat inadequate (affects all weapons on the platform) and we are looking to make it a lot more useful.
There really is no need to emit radio waves since it will give out your location. I don’t know if the scenario is affected by them. In this scenario you could relay on Mk-II eyeballs and periodically use the radar on the helicopters.
I hope they will ad some nice damage models...
Unsure why the Russian corvettes didn't use their sams against your harpoons earlier/at all, have seen them be quite successful in that regard.
What's up with aircraft endurance? I didn't see any indication of flight time remaining.
You lucky lucky bastard :) MOAR!
Game was worth the wait
how did the 2nd harpoon go straight? was it automatically or did u set it up like that?
Waiting for this since Fleet Command. How did you get the game? For me it is not released on Steam.
reminds me ,a lot,of Harpoon (edit: Harpoon II)
16:26 how do you do that because from what I've seen when you engage it deselects the weapon
Might be nitpicky but that AS-7 (Kh-23) hitting your ship should have missed. As far as I know those missiles aren't inertially or otherwise stabilized in their flight path and need to be continuously guided manually by the pilot. Since you've shot down the MiG-23 guiding it several seconds before the impact, that missile should have nose dived into the water I think.
the missile is guided through beam riding, but if I remember right the pod providing the beam mounted aboard the MiG does have genuine stabilization so the MiG losing stability wouldn't prevent it from flying straight so long as the target was within the pod's angle limits. still, you can see in the video the Kh-23 appears to be actively tracking the target rather than simply flying straight, which would be impossible without continued input from the pilot
available yet or not seen all these clips bit not yet on steam ?
When the game comes out, do you think I could have the map on one monitor whist the 3d view is on another? That would be awesome.
They appear to be independent windows, so I am really hoping that we can move them around at will, especially to another monitor.
It's something the team is aware of, but it's not currently possible to move those windows outside of the game. they are styled to look like the windows we are familiar with
@@UGBtactical It would be so cool to have. My favorite feature I've seen so far is the hanger animations. I've always wanted an rts game that really focuses on the small details. This is going to be my game of the year for me.
is there a Q& anywhere out right now that you know of?
This could be awesome. It would be amazing if instead of doing stuff from the 3d view, you could do it as an officer in a CIC/AIC.
I would have one helo loaded with sonabouys and the other one loaded with torps.
Id pay 2x the price to get my hands on it rn xd
Great game, I want it!
In real life isn’t the Surface search & Air search radar almost always on since the USS Stark?
I really wanna see PvP for this game, been playing a lot of nebulous recently (basically asymmetric naval warfare in space) and the depth of something like this seems insanely fun for a slow PvP game
I was thinking the same thing.
Highfleet ending simulator
Seems like a lot of micromanagement. It wouldn't be so bad if you only controlled a single vessel like in CW but it seems like it could become very hairy to manage pretty quickly. Looks beautiful though.
can you control ships and vehicles through wasd keys or minimap only?
You can direct control if you like, yes.
will this game have a multiplayer to play against my friends for exsample ?
Love these videos :)
I’ve been waiting for this game for so long without hearing anything I was starting to think it had been abandoned. Now there is more gameplay out than I can handle. Can’t wait for this one.
Dev has been hammering out dev logs on Steam lately. Think they’ve also been pretty active on Discord?
those missile launchers are cool, but damn are they slow to actually fire. Feel like ships with those single launcher systems are gonna be really frustrating when it comes to fast reaction stuff like low flying jets
It's true to life in some aspects, there is a reason why modern navies moved to VLS systems.
@@lmaoroflcopterwhat does ‘S’ in VLS stand for?
@@Angel33Demon666Vertical Launch System
@Angel33Demon666 System. Which isn't plural in case you were unaware.
Hence, VLS systems. They have opted for VLS systems. As there are many VLS options to select from.
Didn't expect to have to teach someone basic English today, but you're welcome
the single rail of the Perry is by far the fastest of the rail launchers. everything else is even slower
Is the U.S. flag correct? I swear every time we get a decent look at it, it looks like a 48-star flag. Unless the scenario takes place before July 4, 1960, it should be the 50-star flag
Hammmmond!
Anyone else keep trying to use their mouse to move his screen?
U forgot to use the other ships anti air missiles
super... look nice...game menu's need more work ...
Same as DCS? just naval focused and cold war era?
Same as cold waters but with a focus on surface vessel action as well air to air and escorts.
Can you show the soviet ships too ?
Do the signalling flags have any real meanings in the game?
Why immediately activate air search radars? In all the recent streams I've been seeing, i have a feeling that people don't understand that emitting immediately equals being spotted
the "map" is quite unreadable unless you zoom out , really far
Great to see the game but it's sometimes painful watching bros reaction time. Not saying I won't watch more but my guy took so many risks with the Perry cruiser I thought for sure they were gonna wreck it. We won't even talk about the helis.
I dont like naval combat that much...and this game looks incredible.
Do you need to pay attention to fuel on your aircraft?
They will automatically evac bingo.
How do we play the game now?
Cant yet he was given the chance to play by devs
@@dogf1ghter Right so how do I get the devs to give me a chance too?
@@AdmitNone Be a gaming youtuber with a lot of audience.
You have to wait until November until a demo is released
is this multiplayer?
When you are being attacked, turn off weapons tight and go to weapons free. I have seen every youtuber who has showcased this game lose ships simply because they choose either not to react in a timely manner, or because they don't know that their ships won't react with weapons tight until the last second. It gets quite aggravating to watch.
Weapons free wastes missiles, and in this case I was just unlucky my Standards didn't get the job done. :( I possibly could have made the Knox class weapons free, but definitely not the OHP
this game is promising, I had no idea that naval warfare sim was a thing, I'm thrilled!
Try cold wars! It's a slightly older game from the same devs. I love that game. Perfect mix of deep realistic mechanics with arcade controls
If DEVs are looking at comments on your page, just a small point…
You mentioned… gushed about the attention to detail, however the moon and sun were up, but the moon wasn’t “lit” correctly from the sun.
Was lit like the sun was in a different place.
Little things like this all add up to subconsciously ruin the emersion the rest of the awesome detail was creating.
18:41 ???? this has to be a bug. Those migs had no right being alive past this point IRL lmao
IRL an Iranian F-4 took an SM-2 in the arse and it managed to land back at it's base
Everything is looking great about this game…except the air AI. Pretty much universally bad in every play through I’ve seen so far.
This is about the fifth video I have seen on this game and I have not yet once seen the player lose. Is this possible, because if not the game is either unbalanced or has crap AI.
I want to like this game, but so far it just looks like shooting fish in a barrel.
@rags417 Most scenarios are set up to be easy at the moment but there are a few much more difficult. That being said most people who have their hands on the game are very good.
Very aesthetic physics and vehicle models but sorry it looks so boring 😂😂