First Test of a Small-Scale Solid Rocket Motor ǀ Sept. 2016

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 окт 2024

Комментарии • 64

  • @theredstonehive
    @theredstonehive 6 лет назад +169

    Don't usually see solid motors produce shock diamonds

    • @tkrinc
      @tkrinc 5 лет назад +8

      I kind of thought the same thing.Would almost think it was a binary system like nitrous and fuel

    • @quinnsams7159
      @quinnsams7159 5 лет назад +1

      TheRedstoneHive ya

    • @rocket_nerd8101
      @rocket_nerd8101 5 лет назад +15

      A big enough one does. It depends on the chamber pressure and the nozzle geometry.

    • @colinburfeind6947
      @colinburfeind6947 5 лет назад +12

      Given this thing is pretty small and made of very secured metal parts I’m gonna toss in my guess that there’s some insane chamber pressure/exhaust velocity going on for a motor this size.

    • @tristunalekzander5608
      @tristunalekzander5608 5 лет назад +2

      I think anything f-motor and above produces mach diamonds.

  • @Wolfennar
    @Wolfennar 6 лет назад +70

    Those shock diamonds are so damn satisfying to watch ^^

    • @Beyond-Horizons-
      @Beyond-Horizons- 5 лет назад +2

      looks cool but there sings of bad exhaust design if its only supposed to work on sea level

  • @dumbname6317
    @dumbname6317 5 лет назад +23

    wow, great job with the solid rocket engine, Ive never seen shock diamonds appear on a small model like that before

  • @Fogmeister
    @Fogmeister 5 лет назад +37

    Everyone 2 weeks ago: ooh, what are those cool shapes in the exhaust?!?
    Everyone now: shock diamonds, cool stuff.

  • @StreuB1
    @StreuB1 7 лет назад +25

    Nice clean burn and very stable combustion. I see purple in your test burn so I assume you are using potassium nitrate though I can tell by the exahust plume that this is not sugar nitrate. Is this a polyurethane/kno3 propellant?

    • @pyrusrex2882
      @pyrusrex2882 6 лет назад +7

      nope, that's APCP. ammonium perchlorate, aluminum powder, probably an HTPB or PBAN with a curative as the binder. If that was potassium nitrate you would not see any diamonds, or even much flame, burning under that kind of pressure. the ammonium in the oxidizer burns as a fuel as well, so it doesn't put off the smoke that potassium nitrate compounds do. burned at a stoichiometric ratio, AP pouts off almost zero smoke at atmospheric pressure, but does produce aluminum oxide "smoke" burning confined behind a nozzle.

  • @Xenro66
    @Xenro66 5 лет назад +11

    God damn, those shock diamonds are magnificent.

  • @nightrous3026
    @nightrous3026 5 лет назад +1

    Those shock diamonds are beautiful. You might want to change the size of your nozzle to maximize your efficiency. I saw a large portion of the plume actually burned *outside* of the motor.

  • @kevb5802
    @kevb5802 5 лет назад +1

    You had it harmonized. Perfect

  • @dinosaurdrew7431
    @dinosaurdrew7431 3 года назад +1

    I’m a simple man. When I see shock diamonds I click

  • @vercingetorix6950
    @vercingetorix6950 6 лет назад +4

    The shock diamonds were so cool.

  • @tinkmarshino
    @tinkmarshino 5 лет назад

    impressive little test.. (I thought the bucket burn at the end was funny) I will have to check out more!

  • @Andrecio64
    @Andrecio64 5 лет назад +5

    I wanna see this type of engine on a model rocket

    • @ralfiasz
      @ralfiasz 4 года назад

      SAMGalaxy32 and I want to see that kind of performance in my Little Boy. As for now he doesn’t deserve this magnificent name.

  • @iblesbosuok
    @iblesbosuok 5 лет назад +1

    Damn exotic shock diamonds. I love it.

  • @kaayfpv
    @kaayfpv 5 лет назад

    Good work! Looks amazing

  • @alecwells9170
    @alecwells9170 5 лет назад +2

    Damn, you got a really efficient fuel to have a transparent plume. The space shuttle srb plumes were not transparent due to unburned byproducts. Yours is burning a lot of the byproduct.

    • @firstnamelastname.7749
      @firstnamelastname.7749 3 года назад +1

      I think the reason the srb plume is very bright and makes a lot of smoke because there is aluminum, where as this propellant appears to have no metals

  • @brucereeves2478
    @brucereeves2478 5 лет назад +1

    Pretty impressive!

  • @Cyan37
    @Cyan37 5 лет назад +2

    Man, never seen so many rocket scientists in one comment section!...

  • @theexplorestore8383
    @theexplorestore8383 6 лет назад

    Nice clean burn!

  • @juancarlos-ct5cf
    @juancarlos-ct5cf 5 лет назад +1

    Next, first test of small scale fusion reactor.

  • @pyrusrex2882
    @pyrusrex2882 6 лет назад +2

    Wait, you're the crazy guy who beat the Ferrari on a peroxide powered bicycle, aren't you? I've been experimenting with a mixture of polyethylene glycols and calcium hypochlorite, which are hypergolic. I even have an engine design somewhat worked out with a U shaped metal combustion chamber and nozzle at one end that mounts to my bike. Pour the propellants in, let them settle in the bottom of the U, and when combustion happens a about minute later they actually self seat against the rear bulkhead under the force of acceleration.

  • @m.samaha4708
    @m.samaha4708 4 года назад

    Good job. Especially the diamonds!
    Do you the dimensions now?

  • @idkhowtoright479
    @idkhowtoright479 6 лет назад +5

    How the heck did you get shock Diamonds???

    • @pyrusrex2882
      @pyrusrex2882 6 лет назад +12

      by having stable combustion and supersonic exhaust gas, also it probably uses ammonium perchlorate, which smokes a lot less than potassium based oxidizers.

    • @idkhowtoright479
      @idkhowtoright479 6 лет назад +2

      @@pyrusrex2882 thanks:)

    • @PluetoeInc.
      @PluetoeInc. 5 лет назад

      Hey man whats up Nice to see you again from Major prep

  • @tkrinc
    @tkrinc 5 лет назад

    from an old Zinc head. Very nice mach diamonds.Did not expect that

  • @backslash-z
    @backslash-z 6 лет назад

    Awesome video! What kind of camera were you using to get 1000fps video?

  • @laifgarrett5316
    @laifgarrett5316 6 лет назад +1

    Very nice!

  • @miguelvelmonte8959
    @miguelvelmonte8959 4 года назад

    As I browse the comment below, you used AP, is it ok if I use AN?

  • @Muss_._
    @Muss_._ 3 года назад

    hi, i very like your project, and i think i want make diy for my learn and knowledge,but i don't know how to do. 🥺.Teach how to make engine rocket like real rocket.Can u teach me?

  • @marouaniAymen
    @marouaniAymen 5 лет назад

    What type of chemicals used in this SRM ?

  • @jozseflakatos1053
    @jozseflakatos1053 5 лет назад

    Hey man, I have been wondering about how did you calculate that thrust power diagram shown at 0:44? I would be very happy if you answer me 😊

    • @patrick1532
      @patrick1532 5 лет назад

      He has it resting on a pressure sensor/scale of some sort attached to a computer running software to record the data.

    • @jozseflakatos1053
      @jozseflakatos1053 5 лет назад

      @@patrick1532 oh thanks i didnt think abaut that

  • @souradeephazra4468
    @souradeephazra4468 4 года назад

    which software did you use to calculate the thrust?

  • @maxwolthuis
    @maxwolthuis 4 года назад

    1:30 my asshole after eating an entire bag of takis.

  • @ROBOTRIX_eu
    @ROBOTRIX_eu 5 лет назад +2

    Aerospike nozzle?

  • @pyrusrex2882
    @pyrusrex2882 6 лет назад +1

    Honestly, if I had money to pour into a more elaborate rocket bike setup, I would be using a Paraffin based hybrid motor and Nitrous Oxide, for the safety factor. For liquids, I would go LOX/alcohol or Nitric Acid/Furfuryl Alcohol for simplicity.

  • @mihylcecastillo1092
    @mihylcecastillo1092 6 лет назад

    Can you give mi the plan

  • @hakant3240
    @hakant3240 4 года назад

    Dude it's not rocket science! Oh wait...