I was thinking corruption. At first I thought murder but eliminating a lot of government and corporate corruption could not just save lives but improve everyone's quality of life.
@@lukpo1997 nah because if you watch him a lot, you know he says dumb shit literally all the time as a joke. seeing him breaks character and saying something super genius was shocking
Nah I know my answer but I’m not gonna say it. It took me 2 seconds to think of and justify in my mind. The only clue I will give is it starts with R and I would likely KMS afterwords.
@@hargre77 but when asked a binary question, it's either yes or no, still convicted if kept quiet, no innocents would go to court to intentionally get convicted .
Just stared blank for 3 seconds and already produced the most ingenious answer ever. Was only asked for one crime, but basically covered the entire ground.
How does he get into the court room to commit perjury in the first place? Would need to have either committed a crime himself which would count as his real answer, or be a witness to a crime which I don't see how he could engineer without inadvertently being an accessory. Or unless he's one of those first amendment dorks who taunt cops into arresting them unlawfully but those generally don't even make it to court. Idk why I'm thinking about this shit... its late
@@just_jonathan3222 if people always told the truth in court then more things would go to court. Doesn't matter if there is evidence for the crime. Take them to court and either the perpetrator will admit their crime or the supposed victim will admit it never happened.
Buying a slave or sex slave is also a good answer. You can just immediately release them. Also, at least the court has a chance of doing the right thing. Slavery is never going to be good.
maybe i'm missing something but that would completely destroy court for EVERYONE. lol. are you saying you want rapists and murderers running free because of this? because that' what would happen
The answer seems smart, but then he would instantly destroy an entire workfield like Lawyer, Judge and other justice relevant people...which is actually pretty good too.
@@zoomed9029 As a dictator, the first thing I'd do is to make it illegal to have negatives thoughts about the dictatorship. Then I'd round everyone up, send them to court and force them to answer if they have anything against the dictatorship and punish everyone who do. The consequences of this would be that parents would indoctrinate their own children to love the dictatorship in order to protect them, since they'd be no way to hide.
@@8is that's some Hitler type stuff times 200 and would be ya know not allowed by the world since there's some human laws the entire world has to follow and if a country is doing that then the dictator would be punished so yeah good luck with that
no your honor my dog didn't step on a bee. It was me! always has been! I hated that little yellow f*cker because it keeps buzzing near him instead of me.
@@sdkwd1677nah I think it’s more about when the accused one is the actual offender and he can’t lie about it, the case is solved pretty quickly, so that would be extremely helpful and solve many cases.
@@kingpotato7183 I disagree respectfully; a good lawyer will know whatever evidence is surely lacking in any aspect of their case, and will use that lack of information to lie and claim things either 1. Did not happen 2.did not happen the way it was explained 3. The intention was different etc.. How do u think all these elitist get away with everything so long as they got money in their pockets 👀
@@AdamX1124 you could have your friend commit a minor crime that would get him to court, so you don’t waste your eliminate crime thing. Then commit perjury as a witness.
@@AdamX1124 i mean if no one could lie in court, surely some kinds of new law would just me made meaning that every couple of years everyone has to go to a court, take an oath and then say if they have committed any crimes or not
@@leenguyen6056 i said r*** first until I heard we had to do it. Then I thought I would do it too to stop it ever happening again. Then I heard jme’s answer and yeah nah I’d go with his
@@lucask841 you and the guy above u need to use ur brains , if u cant lie in court and u have to tell the truth if u commit something then no one will do anything because they will get exposed easily , ofc there is some idiots who will do it but it will reduce the crime rate by a huge rate
@@lucask841 But he did bring forth justice. If what he said came true, all police and prosecutor need to do is bring everyone they arrested into court. Interrogation? No need for that, bring all suspect into court and be done with it. Murder on the train? Bring everyone into the court. Doesn't matter how long it take, justice will prevail.
No, not a terrible person - just someone like me, who was only thinking of the small picture - the crimes. (I was thinking "Murder", but considering "R*pe as well) We aren't terrible people for being willing to be the last r*pist or last murderer, he just has a better grasp of the problems of the Legal system, and what would be best to fix it all. And damn if his answer isn't absolutely awesome.
It's good that his answer of perjury would improve conviction rates, but it wouldn't stop it happening in the first place, though it may deter people if they know they'll face justice and empower victims to pursue prosecution. That being said, there's a huge ethical dilemma in putting even one person through such an horrific experience, even if it prevents anyone else from going through it again. If you picked assault, I'm sure one could find someone deserving of a slap already, thus removing threat of violence from other crimes, but still enabling self defense against criminals .
I love that he had the most insightful and intelligent response to that question that you could possibly have, but didn't know that it was called perjury.
@@YZER19 unfortunately people assume to quick. How do you know he's isn't smart? Simply because he doesn't know what perjury is does automatically make him stupid.
@@LuciferMoringstar999 I think Phil was actually saying the same thing as you - Jme hadn't learnt the word for it, but his intelligence made him give a thoughtful, insightful answer
@@LuciferMoringstar999 This is so ironic. You were so quick to assume that you didn't even comprehend what the other guy had actually said. He didn't say he wasn't smart. He said he was smart and not educated; at least in this context.
@@samueljones9560 Naw naw naw. He's stopping purgery specifically, which is in court. So saying, "No officer, I ain't got 5 kilos of coke in the trunk", is still doable.
What if you can chose who to do it to though? You could for instance r*pe a known rapist to “give him some of his own medicine” (mainly to not feel too guilty afterwards) and thereby stop it for ever Same goes for murder in this scenario
How is that answer smart? If so many people think that it is a very smart answer then it's most likely not a smart answer as most people do not score on the high end of the Gaussian IQ curve. Any non politically correct answer would have been better. Just murder a child r*pist, and you kill two birds with one stone.
@@garybuttherissilent5896and where the fuck did "politically correct" come from? The point of his answer was that now no one would ever lie in court, so court would always be completely honest. Jeez, someones not on the high end of the Gaussian IQ curve 😳
Don't think so actually. You are not legally required to say anything self incriminating in court. Hence the 5th amendment. So this would essentially do nothing in most high profile cases
@@ryan_dalion8937 yeah but basically you ain’t allowed to lie in court anymore so there would be no more fake storys and there would be no more fake accusations so a lot of innocent people wouldn’t go prison
Not really. It's not a crime to lie in court. So that wouldn't work. There are just some special cases where you can get punished for lying. If you are under oath for example
@@rusty_grove Some would say telling a partial truth is also a lie. And being imprecise can very well be counteracted by a good lawyer, since you can't lie, the lawyer can literally ask you, "Yes or No, did you kill the person?", can probably request the judge to compel you to answer said question.
@@Jay9966 A partial truth is never a lie. True propositions are a conjunction of true premises, if you omit one of the premises, the reminder of the proposition is still true. This is basic logic, your opinion doesn't matter. Also, you can avoid a question for ever ruclips.net/video/NiNI4Mn8Hqs/видео.html . Remember, You only need "reasonable doubt" to walk free.
I thought about that to. That would make murder never happen again, but technically would killing people in war count as murder to I wonder. Bc if so that makes all war and all weapons useless.
If I were to be sp hatefull of a person that I would kill them. I would just do the next best thing, which is arguably worse, Torture them and absolutely make their live a living hell.
That's assuming everything goes to a court and the right people are questioned, which doesn't always happen especially with money related crimes (embezzlement, bribery, etc...) for me I'd totally stop bribery.
That's a genius answer because it causes almost not harm when he does it but effectively makes enforcement of more serious crimes much easier. Honestly really impressed
I was about to comment that you could still do it in an harmless way, for example, selling your child to your brother, and then he gives it back. Then I realized that he wouldn't be able to do child trafficking to give/sell it back to you.
@@FireSiku Child trafficking could also maybe be like, vigalitism? Steal an infant from an abusive, drug ridden home, bring it to a better place. Still breaks the law but like...chaotic good?
@@RaizelSX actually he stops all of them tbh, cause obviously you’d only go to court if your caught or if you were investigated, BUT if you do go to court, no matter what it is that you planed before hand, all they would have to do is ask if you committed the crime, and if you did you’d be forced to say yes. And if someone were to falsely accuse someone, that person accused could take it to court, and the accuser could be asked if that person in fact did what they said, and then they would have to say no. Clearly crimes would still happen but the Courts would essentially be perfect and then no one would have to worry about unfair trials, so maybe not stop but certainly he creates a way to perfect justice
@@jonathanlewis2435 If we are being reasonable, murdering one life in order to save billions of future potential murders is definitely worth it and I would do it. Rape however is going to be a strong pass cause ain't no way in hell am I doing that 😂
Yea legit me to! Child abuse is just another level of wrong and I'd have no problem with putting them all on death row. But damn doing that myself? Nah man
@@freeloaderuser6793 this would be a very interesting moral question, would sacrifice a single child and your life for every other child from now till the forever future.
@@MonsieurArlequin it would certainly be the right thing to do.. do you know how many millions of children get abused? It happens wayy too much. It would be morally wrong not to stop it if there was a way
@@8is Makes no sense my guy. How is not being able to lie in court = "all your thoughts aren't really yours" No one is changing the way you think by preventing you from lying in very specific circumstances
@@GrimRuler As a dictator, the first thing I'd do is to make it illegal to have negatives thoughts about the dictatorship. Then I'd round everyone up, send them to court and force them to answer if they have anything against the dictatorship and punish everyone who do. The consequences of this would be that parents would indoctrinate their own children to love the dictatorship in order to protect them, since they'd be no way to hide.
@@GrimRuler It is the every day reality of North Koreans, Chinese, Iranians, Russians, Saudi Arabians, Cubans, Afghans, Venezuelans, Belarusians, Turkmen and everyone else I am forgetting. These people aren't allowed to speak their minds, their children are indoctrinated in their schools and if the government finds out that any one of them is against the government, they are punished. The only good thing is that the governments where these people live can't get into the minds of individuals.
All of us instantly thought grape then changed our minds when we learned we had to commit it and decided murder. Then this man humbled us with intelligence.
This hypothetical question paired with this answer is the best combo i have ever seen..the answer basically answered the question without those extra moral dilemmas. Brilliant.
@@ammonquitalig9077 As a dictator, the first thing I'd do is to make it illegal to have negatives thoughts about the dictatorship. Then I'd round everyone up, send them to court and force them to answer if they have anything against the dictatorship and punish everyone who do. The consequences of this would be that parents would indoctrinate their own children to love the dictatorship in order to protect them, since they'd be no way to hide.
This is the perfect answer in so many levels. Just the fact you've brought upon yourself alone the consequences of the crime you have to commit in order to stop them all is mind blowing.
smartest answer??? no way.... I'd murder someone. I'd much rather end all murder forever, then end lying in court. think about it, honesty in court does NOTHING to stop crimes. it will only increase the conviction rates. a murderer will still kill. a rapist will still rape. a drug dealer will still sell drugs. but imagine ALL murder ending forever. it would literally change the world. I would love to also end all rape, child molesting, spousal abuse, child abuse etc.... but there's NO WAY I could bring myself to do those things.
@@thedevil3890 You'll stop murder but you won't stop people to beat the shit out of each other, and i don't mean like a few punch's in the face or kicks to the stomach., I'm talking about people leaving you with no legs or arms. Dying can actually be a relief depending on the situation. It's not like people would stop shooting each other either. A bullet to the face, there goes your eyeball .... By stopping perjury people would think a thousand times before committing any crime. Also if people couldn't lie anymore in court, laws would change to take advantage of that. A judge would solve 200 cases in the morning...
@@Im-Axes it’s mind blowing how yah sayin this is so smart etc when he could’ve chose to get rid of a complete crime yet bringing justice is somehow better than stopping the crime before ever being committed like in todays date crime has gotten easier than ever to get caught and technology etc will improve so it’ll make it even easier how’s not lying good all your doing is speeding the process but your going to get caught😂
Just go for R@pe, it is the same thing for pedo, kids can't give consent so it's called a R#pe, I would still do it, but to a R@per, I'm a guy btw and I'm straight, like straight straight, but i would be saving the world, would go for a guy that is a child molester or a criminal, he won't go to the Police, cause he's already wanted, 😈 No homo tho I will have to pray 194859393 times a day after that tho 💀
I would go to the country with the highest age of consent and then just have sex with a 20 year old. They're only two years younger than me but it would legally be pedophilia meaning no one would ever commit pedophilia again
It’ll might lesser actually, and society will be better, since the people who know they can get away with a lot will be reluctant to committing white collar crime.
I was expecting him to say the most complicated and vile crime ever, but then he gave the simplest yet smartest answer ever. Gosh, I have a crush on him now😭
![Chicken P - People's Favorite (Remix) [Feat. 42 Dugg] (Official Video)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/a6Bn8FEtxmY/mqdefault.jpg)
The Full Podcast: ruclips.net/video/sA_16icAqM0/видео.html
Gang violence forever and ever Will be my nr 1 traget
The best part is all you have to do is run in a court and say you were the one who was speeding your friends car
Me thinking rape
I will make the geneva convention to the geneva bucketlist. Got rid of a lot of crimes afterwards 😅
I was thinking corruption. At first I thought murder but eliminating a lot of government and corporate corruption could not just save lives but improve everyone's quality of life.
I was not expecting the most genius choice ever from this man
Why ?
@@leeldiorr read it again
@@leeldiorr because he IS black
@@lukpo1997 nah because if you watch him a lot, you know he says dumb shit literally all the time as a joke. seeing him breaks character and saying something super genius was shocking
@@lukpo1997 Haha Lucaz I bet my balls that you're Argentinian or Spanish, cuz none of my latin brothers would say that racist shit.
"Then court can be trusted"
Oh God this is what we need
yes but lie is not a crime
@@guts9205 it is in court. You take an oath to be truthful, so its a crime if you are not while still under the oath
@@neka_jp2070 in the USA yes, in France there is no oath
@@guts9205 yeah, well, Fr*nce sucks
@@guts9205 no one cares about crimes in France
The fact that he answered the question quicker than all of us is even more fascinating.
Nah I immediately thought of genocide. That one technically works in real life too. Nobody else can commit genocide if they have all been genocided.
No, they edited out the time he thought to make it fit 1 min, look closer at the cut when he said 'i would'
Nah I know my answer but I’m not gonna say it. It took me 2 seconds to think of and justify in my mind. The only clue I will give is it starts with R and I would likely KMS afterwords.
@@NinjaPenguinXIV after how many words?
Like we're ar triple 6. Just can't leave it hanging like that.
We're all in phase one, this man's in the endgame.
“That was actually a really good answer”
“Yeah, fuck off” 😂😂
That fuck off came so instinctively 😂😂
Rapē someone
No comment isn't a lie.
@@PPCRWN If you go to court and just say no comment the whole time it aint working out
@@hargre77 but when asked a binary question, it's either yes or no, still convicted if kept quiet, no innocents would go to court to intentionally get convicted .
“Did you kill this man?”
“Yes”
👨🏻⚖️ - Not guilty
Honesty should be rewarded.
@@messybestie-d7i you missed the joke
@@Deadsuit I’m pretty sure they were also making a joke
I plead the 5th.
"Your honor, my client is guilty"
That's not perjury. It's only perjury when you lie under oath. And the lie has to be intentional. Ie. simply being mistaken doesn't count.
😂
@@Dennis19901 does saying my dog stepped on a bee count?
@@germanfisch It's technically illegal, but practically pretty much never enforced in a civil court.
@@germanfisch that's irrelevant, not perjury.
Just stared blank for 3 seconds and already produced the most ingenious answer ever. Was only asked for one crime, but basically covered the entire ground.
Only issue is crimes can still be commuted it is only if they get evidence to put on trial that they will find the truth
@@just_jonathan3222 we take those small steps
How does he get into the court room to commit perjury in the first place? Would need to have either committed a crime himself which would count as his real answer, or be a witness to a crime which I don't see how he could engineer without inadvertently being an accessory. Or unless he's one of those first amendment dorks who taunt cops into arresting them unlawfully but those generally don't even make it to court. Idk why I'm thinking about this shit... its late
@LachyR he could be called in to testify as a witness or significant person and lie there
@@just_jonathan3222 if people always told the truth in court then more things would go to court. Doesn't matter if there is evidence for the crime. Take them to court and either the perpetrator will admit their crime or the supposed victim will admit it never happened.
Honestly, that is the greatest answer anyone could have ever given.
Buying a slave or sex slave is also a good answer. You can just immediately release them. Also, at least the court has a chance of doing the right thing. Slavery is never going to be good.
@@wesleythompson451 While it is bad, it is not that common so the overall effect would not be as great as, let's say murdet
Id say corruption is better. Because politicians being corrupt is a source for most of our modern problems
@@sekaikage is it ? The rules don’t forbid it and it being more broad actually is a benefit for the effects
@@wesleythompson451 I think slavery is illegal in any real country
I love how he just fucking blew my mind with the level of intelligence of that answer
maybe i'm missing something but that would completely destroy court for EVERYONE. lol.
are you saying you want rapists and murderers running free because of this? because that' what would happen
disregard what i said before.. i understood it as lying would no longer be a crime lol. that's my error
@@platonicbuu7454 YEAH I WAS BOUT TO SAY
@@alwaysoneperson768 lmfao. My bad. My bad
"How could a man with a uni degree
Be bussing up mic and chatting this greaze?"
It’s actually so impressive that someone can think so outside the box while on the spot
The answer seems smart, but then he would instantly destroy an entire workfield like Lawyer, Judge and other justice relevant people...which is actually pretty good too.
@@nerostile333 its excellent no need for vampire lawyers, prosecutors, judges and other such waste.
@Robel Habte I know this reply is kinda unrelated to the video or the original comment, but somehow I needed this. Thanks...
Bro like if you thought of it instantly
How outside the box is it? That was my immediate thought.
I was going to say rape,and then I heard the second part of the question 💀
Fr fr, I pretty much did the same thing and I just kinda sat there like “damn”
Same 😳😳😳
same
Same.
Same. But I didn’t change my mind after hearing the rest of the question.
Dude big brained this one. He did not want to stop peoples choices. He just wanted to erase how they avoid consequences.
🔥
The epitome of liberty .
BuT lYiNg Is A cHoIcE!!
Dang...
"Dude big brained this one." I just know you have an autistic reddit-y lisp.
“Did you kill her?”
“Yes, damn”
Lawyer: We got em bois, here's the bill.
@@shrek5668 the bill for murder
@@simiik6346 the bill for the client from the lawyer
Not required to testify against yourself
@@brandonschaetz5147 dude I posted this on thee toilet on break at work. It’s a joke brother.
“Then court could be trusted”… what a lad.
Id just do first degree murder. Lmao jk jk
That could easily be abused by authoritarian states. Imagine a society where all your thoughts aren't really yours.
@@8is but it's only when you're under oath you can't lie so no not really
@@zoomed9029 As a dictator, the first thing I'd do is to make it illegal to have negatives thoughts about the dictatorship. Then I'd round everyone up, send them to court and force them to answer if they have anything against the dictatorship and punish everyone who do. The consequences of this would be that parents would indoctrinate their own children to love the dictatorship in order to protect them, since they'd be no way to hide.
@@8is that's some Hitler type stuff times 200 and would be ya know not allowed by the world since there's some human laws the entire world has to follow and if a country is doing that then the dictator would be punished so yeah good luck with that
In the middle of the dep trial amber “yes I did shit on the bed”
no your honor my dog didn't step on a bee. It was me! always has been! I hated that little yellow f*cker because it keeps buzzing near him instead of me.
😂😂
Hahaha
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
My dog didn't get stung by a bee
Damn... he created a whole alternate reality. Genius
bro made a reality full of snitches 😭
Almighty created it first.
@@Esile.🤓🤓
Would be like the world from "The invention of lying"
@@Esile. Good I hope you become one at court with that " joke "
man with the uni degree putting on a lesson
Fr
I would have said fraud
Every lawyer after this:🗿
man's spitting facts
@@haves_ he spittin on ur moms vag
that is actually the smartest answer ever
Nah, I'd rob a bank ! 😂 That i would be mentioned as the last person who robbed a fking bank ! 😂...and ill bribe my way out of jail :)
@@PurpleDovee that doesn’t really help the rest of the planet and you’re in jail 🤔 I think his answer really was very smart
I thought of the maddest one
@@sdkwd1677nah I think it’s more about when the accused one is the actual offender and he can’t lie about it, the case is solved pretty quickly, so that would be extremely helpful and solve many cases.
Bro i dont understand pls explain
This guy just dropped a bombshell and didn't even realize it.
Wow I am genuinely shook by how perfect that answer was
anything to do with a child if a child is happy it cant cycle anything bad like abuse like violence like rape and stuff
Not really, people already don't lie in court, they simply don't talk about the truth or don't say anything
@@kingpotato7183 It also wouldn't mean you can't trust the court. There's always corruption.
@@kingpotato7183 I disagree respectfully; a good lawyer will know whatever evidence is surely lacking in any aspect of their case, and will use that lack of information to lie and claim things either
1. Did not happen
2.did not happen the way it was explained
3. The intention was different etc..
How do u think all these elitist get away with everything so long as they got money in their pockets 👀
@@avidotaku1198 you right
Damn dude that was way deeper than anything I would’ve ever come up with.
Yea I was gonna off Pelosi. I mean it's the murder hitler to save millions concept.
I could've came up with something deep 😈
Dude was ready for this
He had answered this question in his shower 15 years ago in high school
Heeeeehe
Lmao
he's that old?
@@blackboywiththesauce2359 he's 37
JME is a very smart guy. The man’s got a degree for god sake
He is so smart wtf
You could be telling the truth in court and still get found guilty it happens all the time
@@sdkwd1677 but every who is guilty says they’re guilty
@@terrancewilliams9209 you do know 1 in 20 someone is innocent around 4-6 percent of people in prison so some are telling the truth
@@sdkwd1677 yeah but if you couldn’t lie about being innocent
Listen to raps bro
'I guess I'd wanna prevent ra-'
"You have to commit it"
'. . nvm'
this except no ‘nvm’
In this scenario it would be unethical NOT to go through with it.
@@koolaidjerk lol save the human race? More like save the planet earth and nature. Humans dont deserve life.
I mean u rape the rapist the raper wont rape👌🏽
R the r word-
"That's actually really a good answer"
"Yeah fu*k off"
🤣🤣🤣
When he first said perjury… I was like WTF??? Until I thought about it… THAT’S AN AWESOME ANSWER!!!!
Now the real question is how do you get into a court room. Cause you can’t lie in court until you are called to make sworn testimony
@@AdamX1124 you could have your friend commit a minor crime that would get him to court, so you don’t waste your eliminate crime thing. Then commit perjury as a witness.
@@AdamX1124 i mean if no one could lie in court, surely some kinds of new law would just me made meaning that every couple of years everyone has to go to a court, take an oath and then say if they have committed any crimes or not
I was about to say stop R*pe
Then the second half got me💀
I screamed rape and was like damn nope
I would still do it
@@leenguyen6056 i said r*** first until I heard we had to do it. Then I thought I would do it too to stop it ever happening again. Then I heard jme’s answer and yeah nah I’d go with his
@@leenguyen6056 Ikr. one person has to sacrifce themselves. gaslight them afterwards so they feel good about it
@@leenguyen6056 😭😭😭
Legit blown away by how good this answer is
Yeah
Okay
@@mikegsweet Okay🤓
@@myrdigarius what’s up bud
even better, littering
"You can stop one crime ever?"
Oh definitely child molestation
"but the way you stop it is by committing it"
💀💀💀
😏
@@badsanta7356 bro 😭
Same i was like got dammit hell naw
Thanks for taking one for the team, Bruce.
Is it ok if it happened 30+ years ago? I already got that one out of the way... Butt still hurts.
Bro gets himself out of trouble by lying but then everyone else can’t lie 🤣
Dam. This man just used all of his brain power at once. Like ahhhhh. Speechless
wtf. that was a way more wholesome and smart answer than i expected
People don’t know what wholesome means and just say it randomly now
@@andrecalo4347 wholesome
Every court case after his:
"Did you murder your brother in law?"
"Yes- I mean ye- I mean ye- fuck."
hahha!
very specific victim lol
@@AllNightGamerYT you better don't question why this is so specific
😂😂😂😂😂😂
What if you r4p? Whould it not be better? No woman would hav to go through that again
“Oh that’s easy, rap- oh wait a minute”
Why rape over murder
@@tunmishemakewu331 Because in their mind, they think Rape is R-18 and Murder isn't as socially destroying
@@tunmishemakewu331 murder is kinda needed sometimes. Rape isnt
@@mtrit8042 when Is murder needed apart from other murderers
@@tunmishemakewu331for rapists
Man stopped all the crimes
He didn't stop all the crimes. He just stop the injustice system.
It wouldn’t stop any crimes
@@lucask841 you and the guy above u need to use ur brains , if u cant lie in court and u have to tell the truth if u commit something then no one will do anything because they will get exposed easily , ofc there is some idiots who will do it but it will reduce the crime rate by a huge rate
@@lucask841 exactly people acting like the police don't have an interest in locking people up
@@lucask841 But he did bring forth justice. If what he said came true, all police and prosecutor need to do is bring everyone they arrested into court. Interrogation? No need for that, bring all suspect into court and be done with it. Murder on the train? Bring everyone into the court. Doesn't matter how long it take, justice will prevail.
“What’s it called when you go to court and lie?”
“So I’ll go to court and lie” 😂
lol mans didn’t even use the word given 🤣
@@Slayadrian He did. He said: "yeah I'll commit perjury. I'll go to court and lie".
He said he'd commit perjury before saying he'll go to court and lie. Rewatch the video!!!!
@@Slayadrian Not only did he use the word, subtitles appeared on the screen when he did. How did you miss that?
@@DonnKnee people are weird bruh 😂
That’s actually a mad answer and he thought of it so quick legend
I thought « yeah r*pe seems like a decent answer »
Then he told his answer and i was like « fck I’m a terrible person »
No, not a terrible person - just someone like me, who was only thinking of the small picture - the crimes. (I was thinking "Murder", but considering "R*pe as well) We aren't terrible people for being willing to be the last r*pist or last murderer, he just has a better grasp of the problems of the Legal system, and what would be best to fix it all.
And damn if his answer isn't absolutely awesome.
It's good that his answer of perjury would improve conviction rates, but it wouldn't stop it happening in the first place, though it may deter people if they know they'll face justice and empower victims to pursue prosecution.
That being said, there's a huge ethical dilemma in putting even one person through such an horrific experience, even if it prevents anyone else from going through it again.
If you picked assault, I'm sure one could find someone deserving of a slap already, thus removing threat of violence from other crimes, but still enabling self defense against criminals .
Would you rather have:
1: No one ever being raped
Or
2: people being raped, but every criminal got justice
@@monirhossain69 If every criminal got justice that would significantly reduce crime rates.
@@monirhossain69 would it be equal justice like men and women had same sentence or the sentence are used today
Me:- "rap.."
Him:- "lie in court"
Me:- "yes....that one"
Same 🤣
Accurate
😅
Same
on god! lmaoo
F*ck, that was actually a fantastic answer.
Stop liking my comment!!!!
only the nicest people would know grammar
@@falcon-cu8rp what’s wrong with his grammar?
@@sldarwin5615 come up not came up
@@krieger1969 damn, I sometimes think I’m pretty smart and yet I miss stuff like that
Bro i dont understand pls explain
I love that he had the most insightful and intelligent response to that question that you could possibly have, but didn't know that it was called perjury.
unfortunately people mistake being educated with being actually smart
@@YZER19 unfortunately people assume to quick. How do you know he's isn't smart? Simply because he doesn't know what perjury is does automatically make him stupid.
@@LuciferMoringstar999 I think Phil was actually saying the same thing as you - Jme hadn't learnt the word for it, but his intelligence made him give a thoughtful, insightful answer
@@LuciferMoringstar999 This is so ironic. You were so quick to assume that you didn't even comprehend what the other guy had actually said. He didn't say he wasn't smart. He said he was smart and not educated; at least in this context.
Wisdom without knowledge
"no sir, I was not speeding" - Man who created true justice
Edit: Holy shit almost 3k likes. Who would've thought 😂
Woah! Powerful brother ✊🏽
That’s pretty funny
No. Then you can’t lie to police anymore
@@samueljones9560 Naw naw naw. He's stopping purgery specifically, which is in court. So saying, "No officer, I ain't got 5 kilos of coke in the trunk", is still doable.
@@samueljones9560 and then the police can't commit perjury either when the outcome benefits the state
"My dog didn't step on a bee 😣😖"
I dont understand why this comment isnt blowing up 😂😂
I was immediately like ra- "u have to commit it" robbery
funny i was the other way round jkjk
Ngl I thought about finding a terrible person to kill, then no one can ever kill anyone again
@@skylerschaffer I mean I think its still a semi good thing carryimg the burdon of ruining yourself so noone ever has to had to go through that again
💀
I was going to say murder
I was about to say “r*pe” but then he said “but to stop it, you’ve got to commit it once” and I went back and was like “yeah no let’s not do that” 💀🗿
Brooo, I was boutta say pedophilia 😭
😂🤣😂🤣🤣🤣 SAME 🤣🤣
What if you can chose who to do it to though? You could for instance r*pe a known rapist to “give him some of his own medicine” (mainly to not feel too guilty afterwards) and thereby stop it for ever
Same goes for murder in this scenario
@@liamcassidy5992 I didn't think of it like that lmfao 🤣
@@liamcassidy5992 Then you're the Dexter of rapists but then everyone knows you're a rapist and hate you 😂
"Pedop...."
"But you have to commit the crime."
"Pouring the milk before the cereal."
But pouring the milk before the cereal makes the cereal stay crispier for longer, because it just kind of floats on top of the milk.
At the second bowl, the milk is poured first to replenish the cereal-flavoured milk left over.
@@BeeEatingOrchid Just eat the cereal before it gets soaked? What's the point of having milk and cereal if you just put it on top smh
Pedophillia isn't a crime.
@@dominikrudolfettrich2556 I like the milk, I just don't like soggy cereal.
The way he stares into the multiverse for the right answer😂
Me-“ill rob for the one time”
Him-(makes the most valuable statement of all time)
That’s the smartest thing I’ve heard today
Why is youtube having me rate your comment
@@Techmoblad what do u mean lol
@@shadrach6436 your him bro
That’s so insanely smart wtf
How is that answer smart? If so many people think that it is a very smart answer then it's most likely not a smart answer as most people do not score on the high end of the Gaussian IQ curve. Any non politically correct answer would have been better. Just murder a child r*pist, and you kill two birds with one stone.
@@garybuttherissilent5896and where the fuck did "politically correct" come from? The point of his answer was that now no one would ever lie in court, so court would always be completely honest. Jeez, someones not on the high end of the Gaussian IQ curve 😳
Don't think so actually. You are not legally required to say anything self incriminating in court. Hence the 5th amendment. So this would essentially do nothing in most high profile cases
@@ryan_dalion8937 yeah but basically you ain’t allowed to lie in court anymore so there would be no more fake storys and there would be no more fake accusations so a lot of innocent people wouldn’t go prison
Not really. It's not a crime to lie in court. So that wouldn't work. There are just some special cases where you can get punished for lying. If you are under oath for example
That's probably the single most noble answer possible. Mans out here playing 4d chess.
“hmm yeah that’s a good one”
“Yeah, fuck off” 😂😂💀 what the hell happened there?
how brits talk. He was too smart, they wanted an amusing answer but they didn't get one
he wanted to hear gRape
@@SouLo_47 or kiddy fiddling
@@charliewhelan9488 if they wanted that they shouldn't have been like "oh some shit you can't say on air"
@@dumkopf no
Me: “well Ill have to just ra… oh”
Do it to a convicted r-pist for the extra layer of irony
👁️💀🤣
Right when he said I have to commit it, i changed my answer 😂
Thanks for taking one for the team soldier 🫡🫡
@@foedeeeee4837 didnt we all :,)
Attorney: My client is pleading not guilty!
Judge: did u do it?
Defendent “yeahhhhh”😂😂😂
you get no bitches
@@joedou7 thank u random stranger ive never heard of :)
@@Dav0yt no problem bro
@@joedou7 did you tell him you loved him or something?
Sounds like a chappelle show skit
I feel like robbery would have to be the safe answer here
wouldnt help justice as much, but its a pretty good one tho you right
That is actually genius, like it would literally change the world for the better by an insane degree this man would be the father of utopia
That could easily be abused by authoritarian states. Imagine a society where all your thoughts aren't really yours.
You still could omit the truth or be imprecise with your assertions
Yeah if they get caught for doing the crime it dosent stop crime at all
@@rusty_grove Some would say telling a partial truth is also a lie. And being imprecise can very well be counteracted by a good lawyer, since you can't lie, the lawyer can literally ask you, "Yes or No, did you kill the person?", can probably request the judge to compel you to answer said question.
@@Jay9966 A partial truth is never a lie. True propositions are a conjunction of true premises, if you omit one of the premises, the reminder of the proposition is still true. This is basic logic, your opinion doesn't matter.
Also, you can avoid a question for ever ruclips.net/video/NiNI4Mn8Hqs/видео.html . Remember, You only need "reasonable doubt" to walk free.
Him: “lying in court” 🗣
Me: “murder”🤔
Well there are loopholes 🥶
I thought about that to. That would make murder never happen again, but technically would killing people in war count as murder to I wonder. Bc if so that makes all war and all weapons useless.
@@jacobburr3570 murder is unlawful termination of human life
Ending murder won't stop killings, only killings forbidden by law
If I can’t murder anybody then manslaughter it is
If I were to be sp hatefull of a person that I would kill them. I would just do the next best thing, which is arguably worse, Torture them and absolutely make their live a living hell.
Bro that gotta be the best answer I’ve ever heard for a question like that
That's assuming everything goes to a court and the right people are questioned, which doesn't always happen especially with money related crimes (embezzlement, bribery, etc...) for me I'd totally stop bribery.
Is it because you brits dont have the 5th amendment?
I don’t get it can someone please explain?
Tax evasion
@@Azeez.AS17 But it happens most of the time.
That's a genius answer because it causes almost not harm when he does it but effectively makes enforcement of more serious crimes much easier.
Honestly really impressed
"If you could stop one crime.."
"Child trafficking"
"But by stopping it you have to commit it"
"I got nothing"
I was about to comment that you could still do it in an harmless way, for example, selling your child to your brother, and then he gives it back.
Then I realized that he wouldn't be able to do child trafficking to give/sell it back to you.
@@FireSiku yeah but he just gives it back no need to sell the kid to u lol
Same, that pause was so long
@@FireSiku Child trafficking could also maybe be like, vigalitism?
Steal an infant from an abusive, drug ridden home, bring it to a better place.
Still breaks the law but like...chaotic good?
I was bought to say pedophile
"did you kill that guy"
"yes i did"
Sounds like some Jumanji shit
You could still refuse to answer, at least in the US.
Damn literally that's the most unexpected and smartest answer of all. I wouldn't have thought about that even in a million years. Hats off.
Interestingly enough based on that he may have stopped several other crimes indirectly with that
@@RaizelSX I don't want to be an asshole by telling you this but, no shit sherlock lol
@@RaizelSX actually he stops all of them tbh, cause obviously you’d only go to court if your caught or if you were investigated, BUT if you do go to court, no matter what it is that you planed before hand, all they would have to do is ask if you committed the crime, and if you did you’d be forced to say yes. And if someone were to falsely accuse someone, that person accused could take it to court, and the accuser could be asked if that person in fact did what they said, and then they would have to say no. Clearly crimes would still happen but the Courts would essentially be perfect and then no one would have to worry about unfair trials, so maybe not stop but certainly he creates a way to perfect justice
Same
That could easily be abused by authoritarian states. Imagine a society where all your thoughts aren't really yours.
Lying in Court is not a crime
This is the complete opposite of "You didn't have to cut me off"
I did have to cut you off
Make it out like it never happened and we were nooothiiing
@@pple1 I don’t even need your love
@@ajayrawat9317 but you treat me like a stranger-
I did hasnt to attach you on
My guy is playing 4-d chess while I’m busy playing checkers in my head 🤯
What? 💀💀
@@RickyLafleur1 he's saying that his thinking process is much more evolved than his, hence the comparison between 4d chess and checkers
I've never heard a more brilliant response to that question. Damn. 12/10
thats a genuine answer as well
If I hadn't finished this video and commented before Simon finished this sentence, I'd be on a list right now 💀💀
You wanted to comment rape/murder didn't you?😂
@@jonathanlewis2435 If we are being reasonable, murdering one life in order to save billions of future potential murders is definitely worth it and I would do it. Rape however is going to be a strong pass cause ain't no way in hell am I doing that 😂
“So court can be trusted” FACTS
I had child abuse as my answer until he said I had to commit it.😂😂
same with Animal Cruelty. Plus if it turns out "It's cruel to eat animals" so many would starve
A crime you can commit without feeling too much guilt, and will make every trial a fair trial forever. Perfect answer.
Light casually pulls out the death note. 💀📝
Sheesh
💀💀💀
He pulled the most brilliant answer out of thin air
How tho?
He understood the assignment way too well.
This guy is playing 4d chess
My initial reaction is to stop child abuse or molestation but then he opened that second bottle and agreed with his answer.
i also said that, and when he said the 2nd part, i was like "okay, nevermind"
Yea legit me to! Child abuse is just another level of wrong and I'd have no problem with putting them all on death row. But damn doing that myself? Nah man
But you would have to do it yourself
@@freeloaderuser6793 this would be a very interesting moral question, would sacrifice a single child and your life for every other child from now till the forever future.
@@MonsieurArlequin it would certainly be the right thing to do.. do you know how many millions of children get abused? It happens wayy too much. It would be morally wrong not to stop it if there was a way
It took me a second to realize how smart this could be
That could easily be abused by authoritarian states. Imagine a society where all your thoughts aren't really yours.
@@8is Makes no sense my guy. How is not being able to lie in court = "all your thoughts aren't really yours"
No one is changing the way you think by preventing you from lying in very specific circumstances
@@GrimRuler As a dictator, the first thing I'd do is to make it illegal to have negatives thoughts about the dictatorship. Then I'd round everyone up, send them to court and force them to answer if they have anything against the dictatorship and punish everyone who do. The consequences of this would be that parents would indoctrinate their own children to love the dictatorship in order to protect them, since they'd be no way to hide.
@@8is Doesn't matter what you would do as a dictator because that's not how this works.
@@GrimRuler It is the every day reality of North Koreans, Chinese, Iranians, Russians, Saudi Arabians, Cubans, Afghans, Venezuelans, Belarusians, Turkmen and everyone else I am forgetting. These people aren't allowed to speak their minds, their children are indoctrinated in their schools and if the government finds out that any one of them is against the government, they are punished. The only good thing is that the governments where these people live can't get into the minds of individuals.
Bro is friggin smart omg
His eyes going haywire he saw every possible choice 😂
That’s actually amazing he thought of that and on the spot. What a legend. That’s so good!!❤
'Punches child' its for the greater good billy
Bro took down the whole court system in a single move
All of us instantly thought grape then changed our minds when we learned we had to commit it and decided murder. Then this man humbled us with intelligence.
Yeah, pretty much, lol
That's fucking brilliant, it'd bring honesty back to the court system
This man is way ahead of our time...he's thinking in year 3000, I wouldn't of never thought of that tbh.
Thats a heroic answer this man deserves a medal
This hypothetical question paired with this answer is the best combo i have ever seen..the answer basically answered the question without those extra moral dilemmas. Brilliant.
Exactly, it covered pretty much all the things without favoring one over the other.
That could easily be abused by authoritarian states. Imagine a society where all your thoughts aren't really yours.
@@8is how?
@@ammonquitalig9077 As a dictator, the first thing I'd do is to make it illegal to have negatives thoughts about the dictatorship. Then I'd round everyone up, send them to court and force them to answer if they have anything against the dictatorship and punish everyone who do. The consequences of this would be that parents would indoctrinate their own children to love the dictatorship in order to protect them, since they'd be no way to hide.
This is the perfect answer in so many levels. Just the fact you've brought upon yourself alone the consequences of the crime you have to commit in order to stop them all is mind blowing.
Don’t actually stop them, just brings justice to those who were caught with little evidence.
@@Im-Axes It absolutely does accordingly to the game rules. The crime is perjury and you stop all people from committing it.
smartest answer??? no way....
I'd murder someone. I'd much rather end all murder forever, then end lying in court.
think about it, honesty in court does NOTHING to stop crimes. it will only increase the conviction rates. a murderer will still kill. a rapist will still rape. a drug dealer will still sell drugs. but imagine ALL murder ending forever. it would literally change the world.
I would love to also end all rape, child molesting, spousal abuse, child abuse etc.... but there's NO WAY I could bring myself to do those things.
@@thedevil3890 You'll stop murder but you won't stop people to beat the shit out of each other, and i don't mean like a few punch's in the face or kicks to the stomach., I'm talking about people leaving you with no legs or arms. Dying can actually be a relief depending on the situation. It's not like people would stop shooting each other either. A bullet to the face, there goes your eyeball ....
By stopping perjury people would think a thousand times before committing any crime. Also if people couldn't lie anymore in court, laws would change to take advantage of that.
A judge would solve 200 cases in the morning...
@@Im-Axes it’s mind blowing how yah sayin this is so smart etc when he could’ve chose to get rid of a complete crime yet bringing justice is somehow better than stopping the crime before ever being committed like in todays date crime has gotten easier than ever to get caught and technology etc will improve so it’ll make it even easier how’s not lying good all your doing is speeding the process but your going to get caught😂
i was like “PEDO-ohhhh hold on a minute now” I wasn’t expecting the second half of the question
Just go for R@pe, it is the same thing for pedo, kids can't give consent so it's called a R#pe, I would still do it, but to a R@per, I'm a guy btw and I'm straight, like straight straight, but i would be saving the world, would go for a guy that is a child molester or a criminal, he won't go to the Police, cause he's already wanted, 😈 No homo tho I will have to pray 194859393 times a day after that tho 💀
im sorry little one
I would go to the country with the highest age of consent and then just have sex with a 20 year old. They're only two years younger than me but it would legally be pedophilia meaning no one would ever commit pedophilia again
@@britishpakistaniactor9096 🤣💀
@@britishpakistaniactor9096 I know what I have to do, but I don't know if I have the strength to do it..
Imagine the prison population if no one could lie lmao.
It’ll might lesser actually, and society will be better, since the people who know they can get away with a lot will be reluctant to committing white collar crime.
It would mostly be full of the officials who are currently commiting perjury!
Yes sir, I was pissing on that wall
If no one could lie in court then I'd hope we'd finally seriously start lessening sentences for lesser crimes.
Love to see the demographics
"you'll never be like JME, You'll never be like JME, You'll never be like JME" he actually studied, that's the difference.
U think everyone that studied would say this stfu it was just a great answer
*Perjury doesn't exist in court anymore*
Amber Heard: 💀
This was a Dave Chapelle skit.
Lying in court is not a crime
That was actually good one holyshit
I was expecting him to say the most complicated and vile crime ever, but then he gave the simplest yet smartest answer ever. Gosh, I have a crush on him now😭
??
I would of said raped. If you rape a baby or woman, then no person could ever do it. It's a win win
He got a beautiful mind n heart