This is called survivor bias its a good example of why critical thinking is necessary in many fields Edit: Jesus christ I didn't read the title of the video before posting drop it already
There are more examples like this. During WW1, British soldiers needed helmets for head protection because the headwear they wore were outdated, so the Brodie helmet was created (the WW1 British helmet). After the soldiers started using the helmets, the injuries increased. Many people thought the helmets were the cause for all the injuries, but it was actually because the helmet prevented the soldiers from dying. Edit: Had to fix something in the text Edit 2: Just want to say thanks to the people who read through everything
Similarly there are still people today who insist that seatbelts are dangerous because of the minor injuries they cause in accident. Even though those injuries are cases where instead of a bruise, that person would have gone through a windshield instead.
@@notsonerdgaming3406 It's mainly that they just see an increase in injuries, but don't notice a decrease in fatalities. Dead men don't take up hospital beds.
This also applies to wearing a helmet while riding bikes and motorcycles. Studies show those that did wear helmets sustained injuries more often, because they died less.
I really dislike that he retells history without giving credit to the people that actually made the discovery. In the time he says "but a different engineer" he could've said Abraham Wald and at least have propagated his name instead of reducing him to an imaginary engineer (he was actually a mathematician)
@corporalzeph2518 Wald didn't actually say that, though. The military already knew. They had him do a study on the probability of survival given "X" amount of damage in a given area.
I had a great grandpa who fought in a WW2 fighter jet. All I know is that he fought In the little pod with a gun because he was the smallest of his crew. One day though, they sent 12 jets/planes into the air, and only 1 didn’t get shot down, and that one was the one my great grandpa was in. They did still have many casualties on their jet/plane, but he was able to survive. Sadly he passed in 2010 and I was never able to meet him, but his story lives on in our family 🕊️🪦
They say that in WWII, head injuries had dramatically increased. This was because the helmets had improved since WWI, frequently preventing soldiers from dying instantly.
@@bluescorpion7 head injuries increased, because soldiers survived and was "injured" instead of dying and becoming "deceased". So the helmets did their job. It just looks weird if you only look at the statistics.
Yes exactly because the ones that fail the test do not get to come back and report that they failed. They either get shot down in a war zone so they can't be retrieved and studied, or they do unalive so they can't come and say that the coping mechanism was not working long term. Unfortunately society may only care if it works short term until you've left that specific job and then youre someone else's problem
@@pharaohsmagician8329 Revelation 3:20 Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. HEY THERE 🤗 JESUS IS CALLING YOU TODAY. Turn away from your sins, confess, forsake them and live the victorious life. God bless. Revelation 22:12-14 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last. Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
This is why diversity of thought is the most important form of diversity. People who have different instincts and analytical approaches can be very valuable when you’re focused on problem solving, though you may disagree on other topics like politics or interests etc.
@@Hellol-po7eqThink of it this way. The planes were hit in those areas, and they survived. None of the planes that survived were hit in the other areas. So the ones that did get hit in those areas must have never made it back. So those are the areas that need reinforcement.
A similar thing happened during ww1 with helmets(I think, I heard this some time ago). After giving helmets to soldiers there was an increase of soldiers suffering from head trauma/wounds. Some thought that it was because soldiers were less careful thinking the helmets protected them but instead the reason was that those who died were reported as just dead not how they died so while the number of head wounds increased the number of dead decreased.
A similar situation already happened in WW1. After the British Army issued helmets to all Frontline soldiers, they notice a massive increase in injuries and were about to retrieve the helmets until someone notice that the number of injuries might have increased, but the number of deaths decreased by a similar amount, meaning that the helmets worked and lessened deaths to injuries.
@@alexmiotke8016okay and? It doesn't make his comment of any less value so why the hate? First time seeing comments being repeated in a comment section? Lol
Survivor's Bias is also why if I collect the statement of a group of people to find the chance to survive Russian Roulette, I can conclude it is 100% safe to play Russian Roulette. Someone may be able to explain the example better but this a example of Survivor's Bias
Zack's videos are the absolute opposite of brainrot. You can quickly consume those without thinking too much, but it's actually interesting and educative.
@@herosdiaz8757 because the hit spots of the planes that came back survived, meaning they werent in vital need of reinforcement, however the planes that got hit in the non-hit spot didnt come back meaning they died and so those parts were vital to protect and reinforced
“Why not reinforce the whole plane”? 1. It would make the plane heavier, slower and an easier target. 2. Armor was mainly for the Pilots and the fuel tanks were self-sealing. 3. A Minengeschoss (Mine Shell) had more explosive filler than most Allied Cannon Rounds. 4. It is easier to replace an aircraft than a Pilot 5. This should be Common Sense.
@@I_inhale_spaghetti_regularlyYou have no clue about common sense and no I don’t play War Thunder, at least against players. I just like flying planes from time to time but War Thunder is not a simulator, and I don’t care what Nation I play. Edited for spelling mistakes
They did not assume the bullets holes were clustered at the weakest points, they noticed the planes were all being hit in the same areas so their first instinct was to add reinforcements to the place most likely to be hit
That is absolutely what they should have done. If you just reinforce the parts that can survive even while heavily damaged then its more likely the more valuable and critical areas will be hit instead
@IDareYouToTakeALooki have never gotten bot comments before💀 Can you stop talking about phedophila and that age is just a number, you also need consent, what are you, drake?
@@nidohime6233 I wouldn’t say this is intrinsically bias. But rather it’s simply lacking critical information. The only information they receive it was where their surviving planes were damaged. Assuming the inverse of the areas not being damage being the most important to protect actually is relying on having no information on those spots getting damage. Basically it’s proving some thing with a negative which is very very intuitive for people then they’re running data sets because as I said it’s the lack of information that prove something rather than information itself
@@empireyouth5791The bias refers to the data. The data set is intrinsically biased because the data points that don't survive-but that are equally relevant-don't get to make part of it, even though they should.
I remember this discussion. Trying to armor the parts that were shot instead of armoring the parts that keep the plane going. I think we actually went over that in a psychology class about missing the deeper issue.
When I read Jurassic Park and got to the part where Ian Malcolm talks about "thin-telligence," my mind immediately went to this. Thintelligence is understanding the data, intelligence is understanding the context behind the data.
That’s one of those things that is both incredibly clever yet incredibly obvious at the same time. Seeing the world from someone or something else’s perspective is a difficult thing to do
![YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Catch Me [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KxwEXXFQMTY/mqdefault.jpg)
A prime example of why just being great at your job doesn't mean you're excellent at it.
@Dont.ReadMyBannernobody asked
@Dont.ReadMyBannerWomp womp lil man
Ok but this isn't true. This is just a common example of confirmation bias
A prime example why you should not believe everything on internet. This story has nothing to do with survivorship bias.
@Dont.ReadMyBanner WAHHH WAHHH
This is why it’s so important to have peers look over these things alongside you.
What you may overlook, another sees with perfect clarity
Fabulous comment, well done
sisyphus ultrakill????
A visitor?
DESTROY
Indeed.. child of man
" What doesn't kill you makes you stronger"
Would you like to come over and play gacha life with me
@IDareYouToTakeALookreported
@@BkevinmssWould you like to come over and touching grass with me
BOT
@Dont.ReadMyBanner didn’t ask+there comment is way better +get a life +no one cares + our comment is way better than yours.
If this was Warthunder you'd spin at the slightest bullet through the wing 😂
Yesss frrr😂
"You got a hole in your left wing!"
@@literallyanf15eagleWHAT WING!
This is called survivor bias its a good example of why critical thinking is necessary in many fields
Edit: Jesus christ I didn't read the title of the video before posting drop it already
I too can read the title
@@BluecoreGi too am in this comment section
This
ngl what field is critical thinking not necessary in
not a very functional comment… Name 1 job where critical thinking wouldn’t be useful
There are more examples like this. During WW1, British soldiers needed helmets for head protection because the headwear they wore were outdated, so the Brodie helmet was created (the WW1 British helmet). After the soldiers started using the helmets, the injuries increased. Many people thought the helmets were the cause for all the injuries, but it was actually because the helmet prevented the soldiers from dying.
Edit: Had to fix something in the text
Edit 2: Just want to say thanks to the people who read through everything
Thats such a weird concept lol.
"Yay! Our men are surviving!"
To
"Our men are injured because they ...are surviving?"
Similarly there are still people today who insist that seatbelts are dangerous because of the minor injuries they cause in accident. Even though those injuries are cases where instead of a bruise, that person would have gone through a windshield instead.
@@notsonerdgaming3406 It's mainly that they just see an increase in injuries, but don't notice a decrease in fatalities. Dead men don't take up hospital beds.
This also applies to wearing a helmet while riding bikes and motorcycles. Studies show those that did wear helmets sustained injuries more often, because they died less.
@@MyNameIsntMaxwellwe should really start to consider deaths as injuries in cases like these, just worse injuries
The concept of survivorship bias was initially introduced by 'Abraham Wald'.
For anyone who is willing to know the name of the engineer!!!
Tysm
Do you wanna play Gacha life with me
I really dislike that he retells history without giving credit to the people that actually made the discovery. In the time he says "but a different engineer" he could've said Abraham Wald and at least have propagated his name instead of reducing him to an imaginary engineer (he was actually a mathematician)
Wasn’t Von Neumann who actually said that the survivors bias was the problem???
@corporalzeph2518 Wald didn't actually say that, though. The military already knew. They had him do a study on the probability of survival given "X" amount of damage in a given area.
I had a great grandpa who fought in a WW2 fighter jet. All I know is that he fought In the little pod with a gun because he was the smallest of his crew. One day though, they sent 12 jets/planes into the air, and only 1 didn’t get shot down, and that one was the one my great grandpa was in. They did still have many casualties on their jet/plane, but he was able to survive. Sadly he passed in 2010 and I was never able to meet him, but his story lives on in our family 🕊️🪦
bot, fighter jets dont have gun pods
@ 💀 idk if it was a jet but I know it was some sort of plane
Had to have been a Jet Bomber if it had more than one Crew member
What Nationality?
@ American, there is also a picture of the plane at my grand parents house
They say that in WWII, head injuries had dramatically increased. This was because the helmets had improved since WWI, frequently preventing soldiers from dying instantly.
Decreased*❤
@@bluescorpion7Nope, he was right the first time
@@bluescorpion7 head injuries increased, because soldiers survived and was "injured" instead of dying and becoming "deceased".
So the helmets did their job. It just looks weird if you only look at the statistics.
@@bluescorpion7 🤓
@@rinakatsuki2801after reading and rereading this 3 to 5 times now reading this it all makes sense
Excellent example of survivorship bias. Concentrating on entities that passed a test instead of the ones that did not.
Yes exactly because the ones that fail the test do not get to come back and report that they failed. They either get shot down in a war zone so they can't be retrieved and studied, or they do unalive so they can't come and say that the coping mechanism was not working long term. Unfortunately society may only care if it works short term until you've left that specific job and then youre someone else's problem
I think it's legit where the term comes from
Kind of like how people at the top of pyramid schemes try to recruit "if I can make it, so can you."
@@pharaohsmagician8329
Revelation 3:20
Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.
HEY THERE 🤗 JESUS IS CALLING YOU TODAY. Turn away from your sins, confess, forsake them and live the victorious life. God bless.
Revelation 22:12-14
And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.
Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
This is not just an example of survivorship bias. It is literally the exact situation that lead to the coinage of the term in the first place.
The thumbs up by the pilot at the end was hilarious.
Kinda reminds me of that 'thumbs up kid' sitting at the computer.
pilot after the most intense dogfight they ever been in their career
👱🏼♂️👍🏼
Was looking for this comment lol
Bro went like “🙂👍”
This is why diversity of thought is the most important form of diversity. People who have different instincts and analytical approaches can be very valuable when you’re focused on problem solving, though you may disagree on other topics like politics or interests etc.
the textbook example of survivorship bias. telling anyone this story makes them instantly understand it.
I dont get it
@@Hellol-po7eqThink of it this way. The planes were hit in those areas, and they survived. None of the planes that survived were hit in the other areas. So the ones that did get hit in those areas must have never made it back. So those are the areas that need reinforcement.
@@n00bxl71 that actually helped, thanks
@@n00bxl71 Thanks 🙏
@@Hellol-po7eq so why couldn't you understand this from the video? it's the same explanation
Zack switched up from tsunamis to planes really quick
Would you like to come over and play gacha life with me
A reply bot has been detected on this comment please ignore it and report it. Don't interact with the bot it feeds off your attention! 82812
@ACCOUNT_551-k5k 0/10 ragebait
@@miike6245imma pee on the bots creator
Let's just hope he doesn't switch up to towers all of a sudden
“But another engineer”
*The exact same engineer*
Edit: I know the tie is different lol
Would you like to come over and play gacha life with me
@IDareYouToTakeALookreported
LOL
This is some mess here
Nah he had a purple tie
My great grandpa was a pilot in the air force in both world wars! He survived and painlessly passed on
my current property:)
That makes perfect sense. We sometimes fail to see the most obvious logic and go to the wrong ideas.
Hmm .why not just reinforce the whole wing?? .... Still a wrong logic
@@joshualim524 of course there is a reason. Weight,time, resources, mass production..etc
@@joshualim524too heavy
@@joshualim524making it stronger means making it heavier, because it is denser.
@@joshualim524lack of resources i think
A similar thing happened during ww1 with helmets(I think, I heard this some time ago). After giving helmets to soldiers there was an increase of soldiers suffering from head trauma/wounds. Some thought that it was because soldiers were less careful thinking the helmets protected them but instead the reason was that those who died were reported as just dead not how they died so while the number of head wounds increased the number of dead decreased.
Here before the bots
@@RealFishyFrogSame
@@RealFishyFrog People who keep commenting something like you are instead bots
The helmets saved the soldiers. What gave the helmeted soldiers head trauma would probably have killed them hetlmetless.
@@reallygoodgame So youre saying, the bots that spam hate speech and racial slurs are better? If so, please go get a job
He had a point, and it was proven right.
Edit, thanks for the 1000 likes❤️
@@JOAH-Youpage-444uh
@@JOAH-Youpage-444yeah yeah i love that too
@@JOAH-Youpage-444cigarettes can't replace oxygen
That's a great example of perspective
I like that engineer logic. Truly one of a kind.
Who wants to play Gacha life with me
Who wants to touch me?
@@BkevinmssMe! Me! Me!
Who wants to play Fuck you life with me@@Bkevinmss
@@demoman5864💀
Its sounds like common sense when being explained today but imagine how The engineers statement blew everyone's mind
A similar situation already happened in WW1. After the British Army issued helmets to all Frontline soldiers, they notice a massive increase in injuries and were about to retrieve the helmets until someone notice that the number of injuries might have increased, but the number of deaths decreased by a similar amount, meaning that the helmets worked and lessened deaths to injuries.
Great example
The comment below yours says the same thing 😂
@@alexmiotke8016and it’s older
@@kiddprodigy6594 what’s funny is it goes into more detail and this one looks like cliff notes
@@alexmiotke8016okay and? It doesn't make his comment of any less value so why the hate? First time seeing comments being repeated in a comment section? Lol
The easiest way: reinforce the entire plane
Survivor's Bias is also why if I collect the statement of a group of people to find the chance to survive Russian Roulette, I can conclude it is 100% safe to play Russian Roulette.
Someone may be able to explain the example better but this a example of Survivor's Bias
Right. Because those who would oppose it didn't survive to tell.
5 out of 6 doctors reccomend playing Russian Roulette!
@@elduquecaradura14685 out of 5 doctors now recommend playing Russian roulette!
@elduquecaradura1468 5/5 doctor's recommend playing Russian roulette
@@jibstackingbros being ableist while being afraid to be ableist
Just commit to it buddy
that guy nodding his head at the end like its ok when the plane has bullet holes in it
Would you like to come over and play gacha life with me
Would you like to come over and play gacha life with me
Ugh bots
AGE IS JUST A NUMBER BECAUSE MY CONTENT IS BETTER
I mean he just survived losing a dogfight
The animators need a raise fr!
Would you like to come over and play gacha life with me
@IDareYouToTakeALookI’m calling the police
😢"bro as a Japanese little girls are so irresistible we just can't hold ourselves"
Please spread love ❤
@@matthewmccall3708 Yeah please!
@Japanesse-e6sbro stop
And thus, we got the best metaphor for survivorship bias
“What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger “
-some wise person named ZackDFilms’.
Yooo thanks for 1.6k likes 👍
My farts are better than Zack’s farts 💨
Copy
Nietzsche, yk just in case you forgot that wise person's name and would like to read more
This is such a dumb thing to say
Yu zhong
That is brilliant thinking! But looking back, a very logical conclusion. It made total sense! He needed more recognition for his engineering!
My farts are better than Zack’s farts 💨
Regardless whether he was recognized at all, his discovery couldn't get more recognition than having the event published online
Facts, excellent thinking nonetheless.
i’m so confused because is that not basic common sense
Wasn't he a mathematician, not an engineet?
The dude's face nodding just made me lose it 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yeah why is nobody talking about it
👍😀
Who asked?
@@EmilianoRizo-k5r do you feel lonely?? This is the the simplest attention seeking trick ever and I care about people, so just reach out man
@@EmilianoRizo-k5r why would you care enough to ask “who asked”
"Did you bring the reinforcements?"
"Reinforcements? I am the reinforcements"
This is the same vibes as “100% of war interviewees say they didn’t die in battle” and assuming that war isn’t deadly
Zack's videos are the absolute opposite of brainrot. You can quickly consume those without thinking too much, but it's actually interesting and educative.
Now *THAT'S* a good argument! 👆🌟
That last guy nodding got me soo bad😂😂😂
“Just smile and wave, boys. Smile and wave…”
Classic example of survivor bias.
Quite literally the origin of the term ._.
oh someone read the title, nice for you
Bro u aunt special for reading the title🤦🏾♂️
Not just a “classic example”, but actually the reason the idea in its modern form exists
@@dreckigerdan3739 lol, whoops, no, more like being unobservant.
Both make sense at a glance but only one makes sense once you dig into it
I still don't get it. I'm leaning to the guy that said reinforce the not-hit spot. -_-
@@herosdiaz8757 because the hit spots of the planes that came back survived, meaning they werent in vital need of reinforcement, however the planes that got hit in the non-hit spot didnt come back meaning they died and so those parts were vital to protect and reinforced
@@dotand0 ok good. That's what I suspected.
“Why not reinforce the whole plane”?
1. It would make the plane heavier, slower and an easier target.
2. Armor was mainly for the Pilots and the fuel tanks were self-sealing.
3. A Minengeschoss (Mine Shell) had more explosive filler than most Allied Cannon Rounds.
4. It is easier to replace an aircraft than a Pilot
5. This should be Common Sense.
This should get pinned
What should be common sense is not to reinforce the spots with bullet holes on surviving planes just because that spot got shot by chance.
You clearly play warthunder, what nation?
@@ciprules2505 shut up please 😅🤣🤣
@@I_inhale_spaghetti_regularlyYou have no clue about common sense and no I don’t play War Thunder, at least against players. I just like flying planes from time to time but War Thunder is not a simulator, and I don’t care what Nation I play.
Edited for spelling mistakes
The guy at the end: *stops plane like a car* 👍🏻
It’s not about the planes that some back, it’s the ones that dont
Now that's the example of different perspectives.
Funny how humans sometimes forget how logic works 😂
Not only an engineer but also a detective... We rock 😎
Finally no one was hurt in this video
Seems like you're the only one to make an overused comment
also incorrect, clearly one of the plane exploded, somebodys definitely in it
Atleast on screen
They did not assume the bullets holes were clustered at the weakest points, they noticed the planes were all being hit in the same areas so their first instinct was to add reinforcements to the place most likely to be hit
True
same thing kiddo
@@vladivosdog nah, because one makes sense, and the other would make the engineers stupid
The way bro smiled and looked at us 😭🙏
Sometimes going against your first instincts can bring you to an unexpected success
This was true inspiration and true genius.
Bro is actualy a genius for that
Would you like to come over and play gacha life with me
@@Lebonbon-o3k bro these bots💀
What the actual fuck with this bots
Dude these bots
What'd you do to your replies bro?
For those who don't know, on most aircraft designs, these spots were usually where ammo and fuel tanks are located.
The pilot just looked unsurprised by the fight he was in a sec ago 💀😭
The definition of "Think Smarter , not harder.'
??? 💀
xd
It actually were mathematicians who came to this conclusion.
No, the military already knew this.
Yes, abraham wald
That is absolutely what they should have done. If you just reinforce the parts that can survive even while heavily damaged then its more likely the more valuable and critical areas will be hit instead
At This Point Zack Never Runs Out Of Ideas.
Y
There infinitely many things to say see or know under the sun
You obviously do though because I see this fucking comment everywhere
That's the difference between "critical hit" and "severe damage"
verisium made whole video on concept known as survivors bias, worth a watch for anyone who hasn't seen it
Perhaps important to mention the reinforcements would be too heavy to put everywhere. Hence the reason for selective placement.
My dyslexic brain had to watched this multiple times to understand it.
I also didn’t understand at first, then I noticed that the planes that got hit in the area survived 😂
A perfect illustration of why being good at something does not equate to being exceptional at it.
Best explanation of this I've seen. Short and perfectly understood
I just wanna see everyone's face in that room when that engineer made that suggestion. I bet they were floored.
Mathematician. He was a mathematician. His name was Abraham Wald.
Yeah, I read it in a book - how not to be wrong
the definition of thinking outside the box
“But another engineer”
proceeds to show the same engineer
That’s a mfing genius jeez
Zack D's animations keep getting better
"you got a hole in your left wing 🗣️🔥"
Would you like to come over and play gacha life with me
I am a fucing Miner
corny
@@Lebonbon-o3k wth did i do?
I don't expect to see war thunder reference here , but that ok cause i looking for it in the comment section
Look, a clear comment section, no "guy here looks traumatized" comments yet
Real lmao
Can you play Gacha life with me
@Bkevinmssno
@Dont.ReadMyBanner*loud incorrect buzzer*
@IDareYouToTakeALooki have never gotten bot comments before💀
Can you stop talking about phedophila and that age is just a number, you also need consent, what are you, drake?
“😃👌” w guy at the end
Sounds like the bald guy with the bugatti said it first
Its like tony stark learns from its mistakes
Except he almost never ever does. 😂
@@guyman1570 Its not tony stank bro
Probably the best example I've seen of "think outside if the box"
I doubt they ever thought of reinforcing the surviving parts, those people were smart, they definitely knew right away which points to reinforce
zack be traumatizing planes now
Would you like to come over and play gacha life with me
Who wants to play Gacha life with me
@@Bkevinmss️ṉ̵͓̬͈̞̥̭̥̇̓̔͋o̶̯͎̱͐̇͋̅̃̈́͋̽̊̀̓͊̃́͋̓b̶̖̤̋́̋̾̔͗̆͊̊̆́͑̌͆͊̈́o̶̯͎̱͐̇͋̅̃̈́͋̽̊̀̓͊̃́͋̓d̴̨̢̤̗̦͚̺̭̤͙̹̃̕y̷̧̰̲͍̝̘̗̩̑̇͐̾̽̏͊͑̇̃̉͜+B̴̢̠̋̊͑̈̾̑̊͒͗̽ẹ̷͓̺̰̽̍͛̉̐̔͋̓̚͜l̷̢̨̨̫̼͙̞͉̗͉̖̲̖̞̿̉l̷̢̨̨̫̼͙̞͉̗͉̖̲̖̞̿̉â̸̙͐͑̌̿͛̽ t̵̏͛̃̍́̈̚͜͝ȟ̸̨̯̲̝̳͓͎̭͖͊̄̔̽̓̂̋̇̋̀̕̚͜ẹ̷͓̺̰̽̍͛̉̐̔͋̓̚͜ ŵ̵̨̢̳̞̤̝̖̠̘̩̞̘̭͍̘̐́̈͑̈́̐̂̔̽̓͋̂̔ͅo̶̯͎̱͐̇͋̅̃̈́͋̽̊̀̓͊̃́͋̓l̷̢̨̨̫̼͙̞͉̗͉̖̲̖̞̿̉ḟ̴̧̧̗͍͉͔̹͎̻͓̇͊̃̒̄̈̓̉̌̈͝͝ i̵̢̢̡͚̩̞̥͕̜̻̫̩̐̈͘͜️ş̵̛̳̍̃̏͆̏̂̎͌͘͝͝͝͝️ṉ̵͓̬͈̞̥̭̥̇̓̔͋'t̵̏͛̃̍́̈̚͜͝ ️c̸̛͕̯͂̐̓͗͊͛͝o̶̯͎̱͐̇͋̅̃̈́͋̽̊̀̓͊̃́͋̓o̶̯͎̱͐̇͋̅̃̈́͋̽̊̀̓͊̃́͋̓l̷̢̨̨̫̼͙̞͉̗͉̖̲̖̞̿̉
the barrage of bots have arrived
@@Bkevinmssplus I saw ur other channel defending Bella the wolf
One concern…
Why did the plane land without landing gear
Because the landing gear got shot, duh.
@@gbishel well why was it literally floating when it landed
Maybe because a youtube short doesnt need so much detail?
What must go up, must come down
@@schaserneowdym so much detail that's just BASIC
A good idea-reinforce the whole plane
Ww2 planes needed to be mass produced so this would probably make things more expensive. Also extra weight wouod make the plane less maneuverable
Weight.
They should make the whole plane out of black box
@@CubeOramaCubes nope to heavy and to expensive
I want to give the guy at the end a hug 😂
stopping kids from saying first.
Would you like to come over and play gacha life with me
@IDareYouToTakeALook wtf
@@Bkevinmss no thx
AGE IS JUST A NUMBER BECAUSE MY CONTENT IS BETTER
@@trainaddict It's a bot, report and Ignore it, it sad see many bot comment and youtube Dont do anything about it
That's so obvious. Why would the other guy not think that at first?
It’s only obvious in hindsight.
right
Is called a bias for a reason.
@@nidohime6233 I wouldn’t say this is intrinsically bias. But rather it’s simply lacking critical information.
The only information they receive it was where their surviving planes were damaged.
Assuming the inverse of the areas not being damage being the most important to protect actually is relying on having no information on those spots getting damage.
Basically it’s proving some thing with a negative which is very very intuitive for people then they’re running data sets because as I said it’s the lack of information that prove something rather than information itself
@@empireyouth5791The bias refers to the data. The data set is intrinsically biased because the data points that don't survive-but that are equally relevant-don't get to make part of it, even though they should.
Me, an intellectual: just reinforce the whole plane 🗿
third scientist: reinforce the whole thing
Well, fire him due to the simple thing that weight exists
“Or we can just reinforce the whole dang plane.”
It would then weigh too much.
"with invisible paint"
You do realize that the planes still need to be able to take-off and fly, right?
@@caseybanter Nooo really? I thought they were weird models of cars, my bad
@@fluffsquirrel wow, you thought that? That's sad.
Real ones know the Top G has already talked about this.
What top G? You mean Andrew Tate?
This is a common story people tell to each other.
I heard it a decade ago
Where Dyu think he got it from. I’ve even heard the story before
Was looking for this comment 😂
Who is top g
Bro just upgrade whole plane💀
Adding armor adds weight. Too much armor makes it too heavy
@@scooternc95 i send same massage in a video that same subject and ı got same response
@@Herobey75because it’s an accurate statement
World:OMG IM DYING
People:OMG WE ARE CRASHING
guy:*thumbs up*
I remember this discussion. Trying to armor the parts that were shot instead of armoring the parts that keep the plane going. I think we actually went over that in a psychology class about missing the deeper issue.
This has been a lesson in every stats class I’ve taken
We are winning the history class with this one
REINFORCE EVERYTHING MAN
weight
Brilliant logic.
That soldier at the end was really aprooving
When I read Jurassic Park and got to the part where Ian Malcolm talks about "thin-telligence," my mind immediately went to this. Thintelligence is understanding the data, intelligence is understanding the context behind the data.
“If it ain’t broke don’t fix it” type
I love how shorts people invent random lore to get better retention
Mad respect to the engineer
“Just reinforce the entire plane.”
-LeoPlayz5160
That’s one of those things that is both incredibly clever yet incredibly obvious at the same time. Seeing the world from someone or something else’s perspective is a difficult thing to do
As an engineer, I could only image the arguments in that room