I never watch Sean's streams, I only watch highlights and Mostly Walking, but let me tell you, the full stream of this is worth watching for how funny it is.
Pitcher: AND... both teams take the flag to the same place. AND... when they get there, they must perform a tedious task for about two minutes before they actually win. BUT... it is actually only the last couple of seconds that determine who wins
I am so glad i didnt bother to get this game. What some people call a "released" game is a hyucking joke. And who was responsible for those horrible win conditions? But thanks for the laughter Sean, glad you still had a good time with it.
Maybe have a chest and extraction point for each team, like a double capture-the-flag. Each team can take control of the other’s chest and generally interfere with their extraction and it’s a race to see who extracts first, so there’s still incentive to interfere with the other team’s progress.
Or what if they shared the same extraction point and same progress bar, I think that might really shake things up and make legitimately no fucking sense oh my god this game.
@@Nightknight1992 sure you could do that. But still would take a lot longer than how it is now. Not saying it's good right now just saying that it's not that easy to fix. Look at overwatch for example. It's roughly the same and they had the best solution for it as far as I can see but still that game can have a long ass overtime
Seeing some bs about how the game need to to be played "as intended" for it to be fun, lol. Then that's sloppy design, if the game is intended to be stealthy or whatever, then remove all extra combat nonsense that could "mislead" the players to play it differently, cuz gamers are dicks, we will always try and break the game and play it however we want.
@@andnowtheweather2948 You'd be surprised. Players often do what is most likely to make them win, even if it's not fun. Good game design ensures that the best way to win is also fun.
My goodness Mr. Day9! I've been following you for several years now. And I have never seen a FUNNIER VID EVER XDDD Your laugh makes my 6am high even better!
It really is a testament to how bad this game is, that I haven't even heard a whisper in reference to this game in the two years since. There are many bad games that continue to get mocked for their lack of quality, but this one just died and was forgotten. Rip Bozo I guess.
I've seen other people play this, and it seems like it suffers from the syndrome of being at the complete mercy of whether or not the players want to play it the way it was intended; the stealth mechanics are the "most efficient" way, but if neither team gives a shit (or even understands them, ie if they're new), then it turns into bad, medieval PAYDAY.
@@testcorecom There's a difference between giving a player a cool and strong power, and wanting them to use it in literally every situation. The players are ""supposed"" to tactically assassinate road guards, avoid patrols, and ambush or avoid the other team. Instead, many default to blasting through every NPC group and... well, you watched the video too.
@@Nightknight1992 It really does, considering there are two possible extraction points. I've seen several games where the winning team outskilled the others by never even being detected - the extraction point wasn't contested because they couldn't find it in time.
Lots of people prefer pad for 3rd person action games- if the devs didn't anticipate that and tune controls for it, that's a design failure. Players shouldn't be penalized for using a very common control scheme.
I really tried to like it. But there's no stealth. Nothing matter. every feature or function of the game is unbalanced and doesn't work like it should. Don't know what i was expecting, I hoped it was going to be like Hunt showdown or maybe like for honor? or something? A coop focused medivel payday game. Or at least a stealth focused pvp game but it aint even that. The game feels like amature hour, like if it was made as a highschool developer project. Anyhow nice vid.
TLOU Factions interrogation matches have better stealth vs stealth gameplay than this and that's just an optional multiplayer type for a singleplayer game. Spies vs Mercs is better than this. Assassins creed Brotherhood is better than this. How could they fail this so utterly?
This game looks like it would actually be a lot of fun if you play it as intended. Northernlion and co play it 'properly' and it seems like its cool. Doesn't explain itself well, but once you get going it's a neat idea.
@@TheBosama I _think_ the idea is that you basically ignore the NPCs on the map and play around the other team. It's not a PvE game, they're there to add a little bit of texture to the game. I want to clarify that the word properly was in quotes, not for emphasis. Aka playing it as intended, rather than like playing it well, if that makes sense.
It looks like the game has some potential mostly carried by a fantastic concept. Unfortunately, it also looks ridiculously janky, poorly balanced and has some very confusing decisions that were made.
See I just assumed this would be an asymmetric game where one team are the outlaws trying to steal the chest and the other is the Sheriff's crew trying to protect it. Because that's such an obvious way to implement the concept. Instead we're... both Robin Hood? There's a second band of Merry Men trying to rob the Sheriff first? Like... what even was the thought process going on here?
![[Highlight] Day9 Creates Absolute ABOMINATIONS in this Old RTS Game - Impossible Creatures](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/B8_HkdY38As/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Highlight] Day9 Creates Absolute ABOMINATIONS in this Old RTS Game - Impossible Creatures](/img/tr.png)
![[Highlight] Day[9] Shouldn't Run a Hospital | Two Point Hospital](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1JTwv1qVubU/mqdefault.jpg)
It feels like a game that was told: Scrap your current plans. Recycle everything and make a multiplayer game in 5 months.
whoa.
Happens all the time. This is why blockbuster Video has so many crappy NES games on the shelves...wait.
What year is this?
I never watch Sean's streams, I only watch highlights and Mostly Walking, but let me tell you, the full stream of this is worth watching for how funny it is.
Is there anywhere off twitch I can watch them? I'm subbed to him but the twitch VOD player is terrible
@@TheOriginalTraz64 yep it's uploaded to this channel!
Thanks for the recommendation. So funny!
Pitch meeting: Capture the flag but *long pause*... it's the same flag.
Publisher: Brilliant!
Pitcher: AND... both teams take the flag to the same place. AND... when they get there, they must perform a tedious task for about two minutes before they actually win. BUT... it is actually only the last couple of seconds that determine who wins
The guy with the chest running back down the stairs as Sean was running away broke me 😂
I dont know what it is, but I love Day9 Playing bad games...just feels like he usually has the time of his live! :)
I still come back and watch this video every couple months... It's just too funny
I literally cannot remember the last time I laughed this hard. Holy shit.
i kinda want someone to sponsor a $1 million dollar tournament of this.
Holy shit, that's brilliant. It'd be amazing to see people taking such a broken game seriously. The meta would be something else.
@@Edeinawc I feel like it'd be 45 minutes of no one doing anything and just camping the winching location
I am so glad i didnt bother to get this game. What some people call a "released" game is a hyucking joke. And who was responsible for those horrible win conditions? But thanks for the laughter Sean, glad you still had a good time with it.
4 heroes, 5 maps, 1 gamemode that makes 0 sense, 30 bucks, fuck that xD
i love how you have so much fun even with subpar games, the way you find enjoyment in the little things is why i love your videos/streams
Man, I'm happy I didn't spend any money on this. It's a neat idea with dreadful execution.
the could fix the winching problem pretty easily just by having a different extraction point for each team. Even if they were pretty close together.
yes, but then it could go on forever. Teams taking over the chest. delivering it to their extraction point and then get beaten. Rins and repeat
Maybe have a chest and extraction point for each team, like a double capture-the-flag. Each team can take control of the other’s chest and generally interfere with their extraction and it’s a race to see who extracts first, so there’s still incentive to interfere with the other team’s progress.
Or what if they shared the same extraction point and same progress bar, I think that might really shake things up and make legitimately no fucking sense oh my god this game.
@@Meatp0pp0t you could easily avoid that by increasing extraction speed based on gametime.
@@Nightknight1992 sure you could do that. But still would take a lot longer than how it is now. Not saying it's good right now just saying that it's not that easy to fix. Look at overwatch for example. It's roughly the same and they had the best solution for it as far as I can see but still that game can have a long ass overtime
this game looks majestic. definitely made to be streamed for the enjoyment of others
The Project Manager line slayed me, that was beautiful
Thanks for making my day once again. Hilarious ! I love your unbiased, unsponsored opinion
Its actually so true. A LOT of people got paid to play this game on Twitch. And it's just ass.
Seeing some bs about how the game need to to be played "as intended" for it to be fun, lol. Then that's sloppy design, if the game is intended to be stealthy or whatever, then remove all extra combat nonsense that could "mislead" the players to play it differently, cuz gamers are dicks, we will always try and break the game and play it however we want.
Well if you're playing it however you want, then you're probably having fun right? Why would you want to play it in a less fun way
@@andnowtheweather2948 You'd be surprised. Players often do what is most likely to make them win, even if it's not fun. Good game design ensures that the best way to win is also fun.
@@gamingking1 A lot of people are competitive and winning is fun for them.
@@dudewheresmycar6318 the job of a competitive game designer is to make the best ways to win also the most fun
@@evanmalcolm4724 Except fun is subjective.
This was not only funny but saved me some bucks as well... removed from my steam wishlist immediately, thanks Sean!
It's like For Honor, but the "game objective" code calls the wrong function sometimes
My goodness Mr. Day9! I've been following you for several years now. And I have never seen a FUNNIER VID EVER XDDD Your laugh makes my 6am high even better!
It really is a testament to how bad this game is, that I haven't even heard a whisper in reference to this game in the two years since. There are many bad games that continue to get mocked for their lack of quality, but this one just died and was forgotten. Rip Bozo I guess.
Thank you for that 9:48.
Thank you for buying/playing this game so I don't have to.
I'm glad you clarified that this game is not a good game. There was some degree of ambiguity.
This kinda feels like the 9-ball pool of esports. But worse.. oh so much worse.
This is so janky, but, when that portcullis rancor'd that dude going full mal'ganis, it was... hope.
I've seen other people play this, and it seems like it suffers from the syndrome of being at the complete mercy of whether or not the players want to play it the way it was intended; the stealth mechanics are the "most efficient" way, but if neither team gives a shit (or even understands them, ie if they're new), then it turns into bad, medieval PAYDAY.
I mean that is then bad gamedesign. Don't give the players fun combat powers and expect them to no use them
@@testcorecom There's a difference between giving a player a cool and strong power, and wanting them to use it in literally every situation. The players are ""supposed"" to tactically assassinate road guards, avoid patrols, and ambush or avoid the other team. Instead, many default to blasting through every NPC group and... well, you watched the video too.
@@yomama531 i mean it actually doesnt matter which way you stealth or combat, since in the end you just meet at the same extraction point anyway
@@Nightknight1992 It really does, considering there are two possible extraction points. I've seen several games where the winning team outskilled the others by never even being detected - the extraction point wasn't contested because they couldn't find it in time.
This was fking hilarious
laughed so fuckin hard this entire video
So this game is the definition of "It's so bad, it's good!".
Sold!
ROFL....this is brutal! Hahaha!
The dislikes must be the devs defending their turf
Cyberhood 1776
HEY!!! I'm a PM....and I did lead to victory!!!
The sound design is so SQUELCHY. Everything is so wet sounding.
Is Narwhals8mysister still the highlight editor for Day9?
I'm still wondering but I can't find anything either
game looks fun, unless you are trying to win. i dont know why both teams are trying to steal the chest and bring it to the same location
And ask for a refund
he didnt buy it devs gave him a key
@@whitefox25 I wonder if they regret giving him a key now.
@@whitefox25 In this video, he says he bought it.
Who the hell designed this game?
You know what also helps the aim speed? Mouse and keyboard.
Lots of people prefer pad for 3rd person action games- if the devs didn't anticipate that and tune controls for it, that's a design failure. Players shouldn't be penalized for using a very common control scheme.
@@CF565 or they use it for aim assist. You're right, tho, using keyboard for an AC game is blasphemy
I unliked this video, just to like it again
I really tried to like it. But there's no stealth. Nothing matter. every feature or function of the game is unbalanced and doesn't work like it should. Don't know what i was expecting, I hoped it was going to be like Hunt showdown or maybe like for honor? or something? A coop focused medivel payday game. Or at least a stealth focused pvp game but it aint even that.
The game feels like amature hour, like if it was made as a highschool developer project. Anyhow nice vid.
im glad i didnt get this game
So this is the Fluxx of vidja games. Got it.
TLOU Factions interrogation matches have better stealth vs stealth gameplay than this and that's just an optional multiplayer type for a singleplayer game. Spies vs Mercs is better than this. Assassins creed Brotherhood is better than this.
How could they fail this so utterly?
He's so astoundingly bad at the game, it's the best.
This game looks like it would actually be a lot of fun if you play it as intended. Northernlion and co play it 'properly' and it seems like its cool. Doesn't explain itself well, but once you get going it's a neat idea.
.. "properly" ? Huh? 0_o
@@TheBosama I _think_ the idea is that you basically ignore the NPCs on the map and play around the other team. It's not a PvE game, they're there to add a little bit of texture to the game.
I want to clarify that the word properly was in quotes, not for emphasis. Aka playing it as intended, rather than like playing it well, if that makes sense.
It looks like the game has some potential mostly carried by a fantastic concept. Unfortunately, it also looks ridiculously janky, poorly balanced and has some very confusing decisions that were made.
@@dg5059 It's definitely janky looking, but I think its unconventional so there's going to be an adjustment period.
See I just assumed this would be an asymmetric game where one team are the outlaws trying to steal the chest and the other is the Sheriff's crew trying to protect it. Because that's such an obvious way to implement the concept.
Instead we're... both Robin Hood? There's a second band of Merry Men trying to rob the Sheriff first? Like... what even was the thought process going on here?
Funny asf!