30 Things King Charles III Has the Power to Do
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 июл 2024
- King Charles III has officially been proclaimed king. After the longest reign in British history, Queen Elizabeth II passed away. King Charles III has become the one and only sovereign of the United Kingdom. So, what are the things King Charles III has the power to do? Well, he essentially has all the power of his late mother, Queen Elizabeth II. He can do anything from granting knighthoods to breaking the law! 🙏Subscribe for more videos ➜➜ tinyurl.com/SimplifiedExplana...
🟢 Must Watch Videos:
▪ 20 Reasons Why King Charles III Will Be a Successful King ➜ • 20 Reasons Why King Ch...
▪ 30 Things You Never Knew About King Charles III ➜ • 30 Things You Never Kn...
▪ 30 Royal Rules Broken by Meghan Markle ➜ • 30 Royal Rules Broken ...
▪ 30 Things Meghan Markle Couldn’t Do After Marrying Prince Harry ➜ • 30 Things Meghan Markl...
▪ 20 Reasons Why Some British Don't Want Prince Charles To Be King ➜ youtu.be
-----
Voiceover By: Catherine Divaris
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, Music, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Reference: bit.ly/3l8GUbc
Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976:
1)This video has no negative impact.
2)This video is also for entertainment purposes.
3)It is transformative in nature.
🟢 Must Watch Videos:
▪ 20 Reasons Why King Charles III Will Be a Successful King ➜ ruclips.net/video/SzXOTA9mKTY/видео.html
▪ 30 Things You Never Knew About King Charles III ➜ ruclips.net/video/c1FXIObbyuw/видео.html
▪ 30 Royal Rules Broken by Meghan Markle ➜ ruclips.net/video/P14uXRQhc_I/видео.html
▪ 30 Things Meghan Markle Couldn’t Do After Marrying Prince Harry ➜ ruclips.net/video/xQs-VOwIExE/видео.html
▪ 20 Reasons Why Some British Don't Want Prince Charles To Be King ➜ youtu.be
Are there as many errors in those videos as there are in this one?
@@bayousbambino427 I can see a couple- most notably the 30 royal Rules broken by the Duchess of Sussex.
There was
1:55 King Charles doesn't *GOVERN* any state. He is Head of State. Those are not the same thing.
2:50 King Charles has a driver's license and passed his driving test at age 16. He doesn't need a license NOW that he is the monarch. He needed one before he became monarch. Surely the video makers aren't THAT fvcking stupid?!
5:02 He is NOT "immune from all legal proceedings". He is immune from proceedings in his capacity as an individual. The *office* of the Crown is still liable to charge and prosecution.
6:38 Appointing a PM. Simply wrong. The King CAN appoint whomever he wants from the elected members of parliament. It is simply convention (and has not always been followed) to appoint the member selected by the majority party.
9:40 The House of Lords rejects proposed bills All The Fvcking Time. Around 10% of all bills are rejected at least once by Lords.
I give up. This video is simply utter tripe.
Why would you want to like your own comment?
It’s really weird not to see Queen Elizabeth in the pictures.😢
I know right
I also think some of the powers he or she has should be removed or change?
It’s also weird it’s already been a month
@@thesailormercury2 Yes, like in the unlikelihood he killed someone, drive his car in a drunken state, or committed a burglary lol. He should not be immune to prosecution,
@@arlenehiles2689 if he wants to in his words to make the monarchy modern then he should remove the immunity rule to show everyone that he is no difference then his subjects .
heck his mother remove his brother immunity rule , for me what queen Elizabeth did to King Charles brother did was a Smart move.
its great
Charles III is literally the King of Canada, not just the head of state. Canada has a King.
I wouldn’t expect much from this video, half the things are exaggerated or just unconfirmed rumours spoken as fact
Along with pretty boy PM Trudeau
Don't suppose he can 'do something' about 'Emperor Palpuotine' - preferably something involving a gibbet...
@@mikejohnson5884 Canadian PM Justin Trudeau has gotten good looks from his mother Margaret who was very pretty as a young woman.
@@65mcman he is king of Canada.
IN MY VIEW
As an American I found this fascinating watching and learning about your new King and his duties. Thank you.
That's not surprising, given how little Americans, including those that produced this video, know about the world outside their country. This piece is rife with errors. With awareness of it or not, you've fallen into an echo-chamber of innacuracies.
@@bayousbambino427 IN MY VIEW/ What's wrong with you? Do you not recognize when someone says something positive about another country. You have some ugliness inside your heart.
@@carolynthornton8017 LOL Aw, did you expect your ignorance to be enabled? That's precisely why your countrymen are stereotyped as clueless about the world beyond America's borders. This video is full of errors and you congratulated the creators for it. For shame.
@@bayousbambino427We actually fought a war so we didn't have to care, so we don't really get into the details that much.
@@lostamericanhistory2536 Is that supposed to be a brag?
It’s prosecution not persecution! They are very different terms.
Ok, and?
What he said
Yes though they often go hand in hand.
Words do have meaning and are important. I've heard so-called journalists make this mistake many times.
Persecuting is akin to being hunted lol. You are right.
Weirdly, he already has a driving license because he passed his driving test around 50 years ago.
And her late majesty got hers during WWII.
@@nunyabiznez6381 Yes she did, as well as also train to be a car mechanic.
@@arlenehiles2689 Her father was the first UK monarch to drive a motor vehicle. He was a very enthusiastic driver. More accurately, as Duke of York he learned to drive before his elder brother did but technically his brother was the first monarch to have driven while a monarch. George VI insisted upon only driving UK manufactured cars whereas Edward VII insisted on driving Mercedes's almost exclusively. Their Dad preferred Rolls and Bentley but never actually learned to drive one. Edward VII did drive as I said but like his Dad, he preferred to be driven. Their grandfather, Edward VII was the first British Monarch to ride in an automobile but never learned to drive. And of course Victoria, who died in 1901, never rode in a car though they certainly existed before her passing. I heard a story of how she had witnessed an automobile spooking a horse and so she considered them to be dangerous. Edward VIi also considered them to be dangerous at first but changed his mind later on.
The monarch doesn’t need a drivers license. He is the drivers license.
@@timbredan3476 Technically Driving licences and passports are issued in the Monarch's name so it is impossible for him to have a document issued to him by him.
It's Commonwealth Realms plural not singular, he holds all those thrones independently of each other and can lose them without affecting the other like Barbados that was mentioned. England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are NOT independent nations, he is King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Note that the first three nations aren’t referred to by name.
Scotland is set to have another plebiscite soon on complete independence from England. They absolutely can secede from the United Kingdom and end it, since this is dependent on the unification of Scotland and England. Whether they elect to have the House of Windsor-Mountbatten as their head of State is up for grabs. Northern Ireland can choose to secede and join the Irish Republic. Wales seems to be the one nation least likely to vote for secession. Overseas within the Commonwealth, the Caribbean Nations, especially in Jamaica are seemingly likely to put a President in as head of State. The Government of Australia is in firm control of Republicans at the moment. Canadians seem less than thrilled now keeping the British Monarch as head of State. I do not see due to his quirkiness of personality and temperament Charles being able to hold all the different consistent parts of the realm together. He is a throwback to the Hanoverians and people will see this as time goes on. He does not seem to have inherited his Mothers sense of discretion, wisdom, and timing, nor her placid temperament.
Jamaica us strongly talking about exiting as per my Jamaican friends info.
Canada. May in 5 yrs also
@@boessheila50 yes you are right Jamaican Pm has said to prince william that his country is going to move on from the monarchy .
The busiest people he's got to understand the British people he's got to understand that people will not be serving Kim was he wants to be the centre of attention the British people have got their own mate they can make their own minds up on Charles II and he's got the power to do that to rule the British people you haven't got not got the power just have people what to do and how to do it you have not got the power to do that people have got the right of opinion on child the third he's not going to make a good king like his mother was and the queen was a marvellous job and he's got a lot to live up to got a lot to live up to anything she's going to strike the people to tell him tell people what to do and he doesn't work like that do you do not tell people what to do they got their own opinions on Charles II and it will not make a great monarch and it's too old to be on the throne child of 30 is too old he's 75 years old you should have passed it down to William put his more younger and energetic and Catherine and William and more younger and energetic on the country far better than Charles and slimming down the monarchy he's not going to do much good slimming down the monarchy is a bad decision on Charles's Park slimming down the monarchy not going to get him any favours with the British people slimming the monarchy down and it does he think he is telling the British people you got to get control by Charles III doesn't work like that you don't people have got a lot to their opinion
In fact under the Succession to the Crown Act only the first six people in the line to the throne need the Sovereign's permission to marry. Also most if not all Royal Prerogatives are eiher done in the Sovereign's name by the Government or on the advice of the government.
Barbados has been self governing since 1961 and has celebrated 30 November as its Independence Day since 1966 when it gained full independence.
You're right. Barbados was independent, they have only recently changed their head of state.
Hope other countries would do soon.... These reptiles should only be on that fucked up island
@@thegr8dowite What fucked up island. I hope you are not talking about my country.
@@jimbo6059 not at all sir
His Majesty King Charles III did pass a driving test. He was only a prince then so he needed a license to drive.
this is what i was going to say, i wonder how long he has left before it needs renewing
@@gerrimilner9448 renewal is off the table now. his medical team may advise to stop driving but the decision is up to charles
@@rivenoak i meant how long is there left on his current licence, before it would need renewing if he was not the king. i would be happy to be driven everywhere not by the bus driver
Also worth noting: in the 14 realms outside of the UK the monarch is represented by a Governor-General (appointed by the monarch on the advice of the relevant PM) who carries out most of the monarch's duties and powers on the monarch's behalf.
As well, the monarch is represented in the government each of the provinces/states/territories of Canada and Australia by a Lieutenant Governor (although they do not hold a specific title as monarch of each prov/state/terr)
Australian states have Governors not lieutenants. The states are much more powerful than Canadian provinces. The Territories have administrators except for the Australian Capital Territory which has a Republican form of government.
Still very embarrassing to be one of them.
2:40 Licence - he has the ones he got while his mother was alive and the monarch...
Does not need is not the same as does not have!
Why do Americans always get things wrong?
Very interesting to know this kind of things thank you.
Fascinating. I did not know most of these things. Very informative and well presented. 👍🏻☮️
Thanks for the information.
Wow thanks for the video
You mean thanks for the misinformation.
Charles went to Gordonstoun, said as Gordonstun NOT Gordonstown, which the narrators keep saying.
If the only person who can drive without a licence is the King, or presumably a Queen as well, then chances are he has a driving licence from when he passed as the prince.
needs renewing every 3 years after 70 wo'nt need to do that now.
The Monarch can choose anyone from the winning party to become Prime Minister, it does not have to be the leader of that party. However the Monarch as a general rule has appointed the leader of the winning party to be Prime Minister, but as mentioned it does not have to be. There are official websites that mention what powers the Monarch has, and the list is extensive. The above mentioned is just one of those powers.
I would add this is only in theory in reality if he ignored the election result he’d likely be deposed
He gets told wat to do by Catholic order. If he or others step too far he meet Diana
Queen Victoria Granted Her Royal Licence and Authority to Benjamin Blaydes Haworth-Booth on 6 July 1869. The Grant was Irrevocable. Non of the so called royals have any powers at all.
@@markwindle9379 I am not so sure "Diana" died then but I am sure no babies came from those slimmer than shoulders hips. Do you know the difference between male and female skeletal anatomies?
@@markwindle9379 what are you talking about
I completely agree. Queen Elizabeth was such a multi representation of war hero and grandmother also highly respected woman of dignity and honor.
War hero ?
@@mauricematla8379 ,,, simply because she and her family endured the Nazi bombs when they could have fled, and she herself served in auxiliary territory service - ATS. Her country revered her for it.
@@LL-lj1kq So what do you make of my grandparents then ?
@Legion There's been more wars than just the world wars buddy.
It means there’s been more wars than just the world wars..
The monarch doesn't own all the swans - they only own the ones on certain stretches of the Thames.
In Australia the governor general represents the queen and now the new king .and in 1972 the governor general dismissed the prim minister and appointed the leader of the opposition as the new prime minister awaiting a new election.
The famous words said by the deposed prime minister were "Well may we say God save the queen but who will save the governor general".
He held up the democratic and legislative process. So he was dismissed and a new general election was called by the Governor General.
In other words, the representative of the distinct Queen of Australia did his job, but ignorant Aussies think some colonial master oppressed their democracy. It's sad when demands from change grow from stupidity.
@@Stand663 Exactly.
Welcome to Australia. The most racist country on the planet. Anyone tell the white folks down there that they are descendants of criminals and not native to those lands?
Narrator used the wrong word several times. It should be “prosecute”, not “persecute”.
I love how people keep parroting that the King and The Royal Family are merely "symbolic." Kind of like an Italian Mafia Boss appointing a "Front Boss" (Prime Minister). The Royal Family was, is, has been, and are the true power. Plain and simple. Anyone that believes anything else is very naive.
They only want you to believe they aren't the true power because it takes heat off of them. Rest assured, no politician in Great Britain has more power than The Royal Family/King.
At the end of the day, they control the military. Whoever controls the military has the power. Plain and simple. Any "powers" given to Parliament in recent times, believe me, are merely symbolic and simply only on-paper, but they all know who really has final say.....The Crown.
21:00- That footage is NOT footage of the former Edward VIII's wedding to Wallis Simpson in 1937 after his 1936 Abdication. It's footage from 1923 of his next younger brother Albert, Duke of York's wedding to Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyons who'd become George VI and Queen Consort Elizabeth after the Abdication (and, yes, these were the parents of the recently deceased Elizabeth II and maternal grandparents of Charles III). George VI would die in 1952 while his widow survived as the Queen Mother until her death at age 101 in 2002! Oh, and the Queen Mother especially would have been infuriated to have been mistaken for the Duchess of Windsor who mutually detested each other!
The PM is CUSTOMARILY the leader of the most voted party. It is not required
The Queens Representative dismissed the Prime Minister of Australia in 1974.
Regards,
Geoff. Reeks
Whilst you are correct, the decision had to be ratified by the Monarch before it was made official and public.
The King does not govern, he reigns. He is a constitutional monarchy.
Do you check your facts? The last time a British sovereign dismissed a prime minister was not in 1834, but in 1975, when the Queen's emissary in Australia dismissed a democratically elected PM by the name of Gough Whitlam. Every Australian knows this because it illustrates the reality of sovereign "reserve" powers.
Ok I have a question I've seen it quoted here and elsewhere 'the ruling Monarch is the only person in the uk who never needs to pass a driving test' and 'Charles never had to pass a driving test' so given that he has driven in the past and wasn't the reigning Monarch the math doesn't seem to add up
A surprising omission here is the Crown Privilege, whereby the Sovereign can withhold information from courts, or anyone else. The Sovereign also has access to intelligence information, which the Government cannot keep from him/her.
In practice it is not known how much GCHQ/MI6 skullduggery is concealed by the intelligence community, but the power of such privilege is certainly greater than many of the ceremonial powers like the never-invoked denial of Royal Assent.
Long life to The King. Healthy, happy and GLORIOUS
Correction, the Prime Minister is not chosen based on the party that won a majority of seats in Parliament, it is based on the party that won a plurality of seats, i.e. the party that more seats than any other, it does not need to hold a majority of the seats. As well, parties can form a coalition to combine for a plurality.
Interesting.
"Wrong" is the word you were looking for.
Many of these things were slightly wrong. And the word you were looking for is prosecution not persecution.
The king can fire a Prime Minister! Does the rule only apply to the UK, or does Canada apply as well? Getting rid of Trudeau would certainly boost Royal popularity around here
I too have the power to end dinner parties in my house.
Then again, the video is entertaining ...
Sovereign immunity - what about - Clause 61 Magna Carta (1215)?
Well, wasn't that revealing or rather, confirming?
I'd heard long ago that the sovereign there ". . . retained all powers unto self on condition that they not be used . . . excepting for in emergencies-dire." (reconstituted from long-ago memory)
Of course none others can determine such said direness but for the sovereign!
Also, as cutting directly to the chase on this, the Sovereign is not above the law but rather, IS the Law per se, as intercessor posed between God Almighty and the sovereign's subjects. (These popularly believing themselves "citizens," such belief being but strictly nominal.)
Fascinating and, very useful as a summing-up of the key matter.
. : .
In #5, you twice use PERSECUTION when you mean PROSECUTION. They mean different things.
He is immune from prosecution, not persecution. Oy yeh.
You do know that charles, before he became king, had taken his driving test over 50 years ago. So whether it is legal for him NOT to need a license is somewhat moot given he has one anyway.
Do the driver's licenses have expiration dates in UK? Many countries do.
At 1:52 of the video, there is an error. The British Monarch does not govern any Commonwealth nations. King Charles III is the Head of State, yes, but he does not dictate any government policies of those nations.
His Majesty is the LAW.
😂😂
Emergency vehicles in the UK are only allowed to travel 15MPH over the Speed limit on a Blue Light Run!
They missed one when King Chuck flaps his ears he can fly.
Um, maybe someone should look up the difference between persecution and prosecution (wrt sovereign immunity).
It's not " Legal persecution" ...ITS LEGAL PROSECUTION......
@Asherz Stuff how so...I am pretty sure I speak the Queen's perfectly...now with a name like yours.....really...
@Asherz Stuff you need to take a look at your own spelling.... It's BECAUSE....NOT...."BECASUE"
@Asherz Stuff be careful accusing me of that....I will go to the police to report you after I report you to RUclips
He is not the King of England, nor of Scotland or Wales. He is the King of the United Kingdom. And it's prosecution not persecution. Actually, there are so many other mistakes here that to list them would take longer than the video.
The King has also the power to ask others to take away his pen that is in his way.
Yes because he can’t do it for himself can he 😤
I was fully prepared to give him a fair chance. Then he went and flapped his hand about because a pen was inconveniencing him 😤 Your Majesty, scoot it the fuck over.
He was sat in a very specific pise for media, who's cameras are fixed, lighting and site sites set, in front of a window of he shifts, lighting changes, media looks like shit.
He can choose his own name. Nobody in the royal family can marry anyone without his permission. He has final say over the names of royal family members. In other words, anyone who is an HRH or the child of an HRH and anyone who is a non HRH sibling of the monarch needs the monarch's permission to give a particular name to their newborn child. Likewise no one in the above categories can change their name without the monarch's permission. He can wear the uniform of an officer of any branch of the military. He can visit any military institution, station, fort etc and any vessel. He can talk to any government employee he wants to and they can't refuse. He can order the creation of a new medal for the military and he can grant it to any member of the military he chooses. He can access any top secret document he wants to.
The monarch can only abdicate if they have not yet had a coronation. Once crowned the monarch cannot legally abdicate. He could declare himself abdicated but the government is banned from recognizing anyone else as monarch until he dies. There have been a handful of exceptions but they have been forced to abdicate under threat of death. In fact more monarchs have been executed than have legally abdicated. The part of the coronation ceremony that excludes legal abdication as a possibility is the anointment. British monarchs are the only ones that are anointed. The anointment basically means that only God can unmake the monarch. In theory, a monarch can choose not to be anointed. This might be an indication they intend to abdicate at some point. Also in theory the government could retroactively not recognize this aspect of the coronation as legitimate. The government could also change the laws effectively deposing the monarch and declare itself a republic or declare an interregnum (space between kings) during which time the country is a de facto republic such as happened with the first Charles and a fellow named Cromwell. The monarch could be declared unable to rule and a regent would be appointed though today they have a regency council who would collectively rule in his stead or they could choose someone (likely the prince of Wales) to be the regent. Charles could request that if he felt it was time to retire. At that point all the powers of king would be bestowed upon the regent. He can turn anyone into a royal or noble that he chooses and he can take those statuses away any time he chooses. Charles is believed to be planning to reduce the number of HRH's on the roster.
To be honest, he can probably do what he wants. Doubtful anyone would really tell him no
Time to open the drapes and let some light in.
Do you have any control over how many ads punctuate your video? If so, please thin it out. I love your content, but I'm bailing because it's so irritating to hit these ever few seconds.
0:39, to let you know, Simplified Explanation you say it’s Northern Ireland, but it’s a video in Wales. Just letting you know. 🙂
God has always been in control 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂
Script sounds like it was written by a school child trying to write a 2k word essay.
I'm pretty sure he at least had a drivers licence... for the longest time he was just a prince and during that time he drove a car at one point...
I have to agree,
TNX GOOD
😢😢 lucky you; who wouldn't want to be king. Everyone love there mom so my highest condolence to the monarch and congratulations and I pray you be a good KING.
A pity your editor didn't know the difference beween the Royal Arms and members of the Armed Services bearing their rifles
Well put together, although some of it isn't entirely accurate.
2:51 you say that King Charles III has never passed a driver's test - true enough. But Prince Charles of Whales has passed a driver's test and was issued a driver's, so has princess Elizabeth. Also 4:01 - it's "prosecution" not persecution.
It's true that the king can get away with murder, but only so long as he is ruler. Should he abdicate, he would be charged with that murder.
Slight correction, it is the "Commonwealth Realms." Each realm country is a Commonwealth Realm in itself, rather than the whole collection of members being a singular entity.
YES!
Details count.
1. Serve as King. Wow so you're telling me that the king can serve as king? I would not have guessed. You people are fucking genius!
Your Majesty King Charles lll.
It is written! Thou shalt arise, and have mercy upon Zion; for the time to favour her, yea,the set time is come.Ps.102:13. Amen.
God save the King.
Where did he get all those medals ! He never fought in any war
The last time a Monarch dismissed a Prime Minister was Lord Melbourne.
Gough Whitlam: "Are you f**king serious?!"
King Charles doesn't need a license now but he had one before.
Failed in the first minute - he's the king of Scots. He is not the King of Scotland. In Scotland, the people are sovereign
The speeding one is incorrect as the emergency services do have to stick to the speed limit unless it’s a emergency. The main reason he can’t break be done for speeding is he’s as stated Immune from prosecution
However there is usually a police escort back and front of the vehicle he travels in. It's only in places like Balmoral countryside roads I think he can drive around privately. Maybe also in the grounds of Buckingham palace gardens etc
Charles Passed his driving test in 1967 he holds a driving license.
...I do not think that means what you think that means...
"Defender of the Faith" is a title that was given to Henry VIII by the Pope, and which was assumed by his successors, and has nothing to do with their position as the Head of the Church of England.
It is Charles III's position as the Head of the Church of England that gives him the right to appoint Archbishops and Bishops, *NOT* his title as "Defender of the Faith", which is an inherited honorary title once bestowed by the Pope on one of his predecessors....
as you mentioned, a monarchs position is entirely ceremonial. things like royal prerogative aren't really vested upon the sovereign, these powers are given to the government and can only be enforced by them. an example is that the prime minister would wage war but the king can't decide to suddenly do that. Obviously powers like choosing a PM or dimissing them are technically powers of the monarch however they aren't really. it's just again, ceremonial
I mean, in THEORY th king retains these power. It's highly complex and constitutional, He kinda breaks the Quantum physics theory - He both has and does not have absoloute power.
TECHNICALLY he has the power to:
Go to war
Declare peace
Fire the Prime Minister
Fire ministers
Force elections
Declare martial law
Revoke or set Laws
Now here is the kicker, all those powers are given to the government, the relationship between the government and the monarch was set out centuries ago after the English Civil war. while the king stil retains these powers and CAN use them, the only reason he has them is through popular support of the people.
If he were to use any of them, there better be a damn good reason, because otherwise that support erodes and he is deposed. So the irony is that the only way the monarch has held on to all this power is simply never to use it. It does however act as a safeguard against dictatorship, if a PM becomes too tyrannical, stops elections, mysterious deaths ect, the King can say 'Get out' and force an election. The milliatry also swears loyalty to the King, not to the government.
But the country works best as it does now, the ogv makes the desicions, takes the heat, takes the flak, and the Monarch provides a stabelizing ceremonial, spiritual role above politics. His role is one of public relations, not ruling, even though technically nothing could legally stop him from taking complete control - But we are past those times. The Royal line is trained from birth to perform this role, to put the needs to the country before the needs of themselves - Hence why on the day his mother died he drove to buckingham palace and greeted people. Any one of us would want to curl up in a ball and cry, but he knew he had to be strong for the country. We were all hurting, but non more than him, and he had to be strong for us.
Things have changed a lot over the past millenia. The monarchy has been reformed, changed, slimmed down and packaged up and now we have a system that sort of works. Even if you ignore the cultural and ceremonial roles they play, the royals bring in more through tourism than they take out - so from an economical standpoint they are worth having.
Best Autobiography:
================
When I was a child my father cheated and didn't love my family.
Later my parents divorced. Soon my mother died in a car accident. My brother & I could only live in my grandma's old house. The whole family lived on my grandma's savings. Gramdma just died. Dad, now 73 had to go out to work to support the family. =Prince William=
Tell us please.!
SNAP! I GOT THE POWER.
Mr. Bowie?!
How did he drive before he was king then?
I and most others don't see things the same way as king big ears does but then again we can't shove our heads up our own backsides.
He kind of looks like his ears have been pinned back. Did he sneak and have surgery?
Showing Liz Truss while saying the Prime-Minister is chosen democratically 💀. Also saying Charles rarely drives him self is false. He said he prefers to drive him self and does the 9/10 times
King Charles does not need a driving licence or passport now. when he was prince Charles he had both. queen Elizabeth learned to drive with the bsm and when she became queen did not need a driving licence either.
The official birthday is nomally a Saturday in June not the 10th but around then. The 10th of June was Prince Phillip's birthday.
So the crown DOES have some power...
Speed limit one kinda irrelevant, he could travel down a country road at 100mph on his own in a race car without police escort if he wanted because he's above the law anyway.
Also, of the commonwealth countries that haven't already left alot of those remaining are seriously considering it.
Number 5 hit me hard
A very powerful individual
the amount of inaccuracies in this is amazing.
Then, please, do fill us in to accuracy's completeness?
We await this . . .
The monarch may not have dismissed a PM in Britain for a long time but in 1975 her vice regal representative in Australia, Sir John Kerr, Governor General, dismissed Gough Whitlam on the 11th of November, Remembrance Day, the day Ned Kelly was hung. Also Jack Lang, Premier of NSW, was dismissed by the Governor of NSW, Sir Philip Game on the 13th of May 1932.
One reason I favour Australia becoming a republic.
And the Australian Law did change after that and the regal rep. can not dismiss our Prime Minister anymore. I can not wait till we become a Republic.
Go to 15:35 and mr bean is shaking the kings hand
I hereby decree that I know the criminal and would entertain personal bias thusly! ☝🏽it’s how I normally try to defer my jury duty. I am very rarely excused. 😮
#1 serve as king…well that’s obvious
weird #1 unless somebody really steps up to challenge his claim to the throne, which is unthinkable.
When Wealth is Lost Nothing is Lost;
When Health is Lost Somethings are Lost;
When CHARACTER is Lost All is Lost ! 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Please learn the difference between the two words 'persecution' and prosecution'.
Was that a good thing for Barbados
Still hardship on that island
He can also commandeer any boat on brittish waters
as you say the king/queen does not need a driving license, so for the past 70 years prince charles would have had a driving license
naaah not 70 years :) in 1952 he was just 3 years +something old
He can be tried for Criminal Treason against the position of the Monarch. The position is what an individual inherits. Also, remember James I. Although Oliver Cromwell did much worse damage to the nation.