I realize the multiple currents help with the book keeping, however I took a simpler approach to the 3 equations: i3 = -2, i1 -i2 = 1.5, 2i1 + 6i2 -2i3 = 3, yielding the same results, i1 = 1, i2 = -.5, i3 = -2.0. Still great video, very methodical and clear.
sir can you please start making fluid mechanics videos again. The ones you have are super helpful and would love to study the rest of the subject from your videos.
@@adamlomarda0427 assume that we have a node called (a) between the 2,4 resistors, now we have an independent current source and its directed downwards ,so its leaving the node and that's why 1.5 should have a negative sign , and vise versa for the entering currents
Scroll up and hit that 👍 button if you found this video helpful!
Full circuits playlist is here: ruclips.net/p/PLOAuB8dR35ocf9Typ1iX9NRmX0V04UYfQ
please keep comin with thevenin and norton equivalent circuit videos !!! because here is the best
You genuinely do these explanation videos better than any other channel I've seen. thank you soo much
I realize the multiple currents help with the book keeping, however I took a simpler approach to the 3 equations: i3 = -2, i1 -i2 = 1.5, 2i1 + 6i2 -2i3 = 3, yielding the same results, i1 = 1, i2 = -.5, i3 = -2.0. Still great video, very methodical and clear.
sir can you please start making fluid mechanics videos again. The ones you have are super helpful and would love to study the rest of the subject from your videos.
this playlist was really good thank you i also wanted to watch the other subjects of circuits i hope you that you add them to your channel one day
very clearly explained, thank you so much
Thank you so, so much!!!
simple and clear
teacher i have ever seen
thank you so much.
Will you continue sharing the rest? like Thevenin's theorem etc..
thank you so much!
So do we ignore the current source that is connected with the 1ohm resistance on the right side?
I am not convinced that I3=2A, what about the current coming from the left???
Why didn't you use the 1ohms to solve the problem but the 2ohms??
isn't it supposed to be I1 + 1.5= I2?
no as 1.5 is resultant in the same direction as I1 and I2 is is opposing I1
@@endoumamoru3835 how pls explain
@@adamlomarda0427 assume that we have a node called (a) between the 2,4 resistors, now we have an independent current source and its directed downwards ,so its leaving the node and that's why 1.5 should have a negative sign , and vise versa for the entering currents
@@wuwuw5433 Okay I get it now thank you so much
@@adamlomarda0427 ur welcome❤️
I was pulling my hairs when you wrote Id= 2A. Why why what happened what did i miss. Sheeesh
▶️