I'm finding that last story a bit odd. A mother dies in a tragic accident and the son doesn't find out until he returns from deployment? And between those two points, a third party had the time to forge up documents, complete land transactions, and hire builders? For the first part, I call BS. There's no way that the police wouldn't be able to find the OP as next of kin, and would have notified him through his command. That command would have immediately given the OP an emergency leave and they would have been home within about 72 hours.
I agree totally. A simple title search plus a look at bank records to see if any money had changed hands would have been enough evidence. That eye witness stuff is complete BS and inadmissible in court. Anyone who waves a bit of paper and says "I have the deeds" should be laughed at and so should any story that claims someone forged the documents. The title deed documents you have of your house are simply your copy of the real deeds that are held by your town hall or county recorder's office and they would be alot harder to change.
Not only was the sale of that house illegal, but i'm pretty sure that it is a federal crime because the rightful owner of the home, after the mother passed, was on military leave
Last story: so did you go after hrler for everything that was in your house that she had demolished?! Probably kept the furniture and other good stuff. Also, from the bank, your lawyer could had easily shown no record of payment for the house and land.
In regard to the last story about the veteran, here in the US there are federal laws protecting the assets (land, houses, cars, trucks, and so forth) of all active-duty personnel from all kinds of actions. Not only huge fines are involved, but also jail time depending on what the offender did, value of the asset(s) and so-on. Over the years this has tripped up many greedy parties, from landlords, to spouses or other family members, as you can imagine. Most active duty are aware of these laws, as they are usually briefed on them not only when deployed but also on rotating back State-side with briefing paperwork containing details of whatever legal service that member has available to them. Depending on their branch of service and where they were activated from, this legal service could be run by their branch of service; or - if for example they were in a reserve unit - lawyers in their area may volunteer for their service. Civilian lawyers do qualify for a reasonable payment from the federal gov., usually tied again back to the value of the asset(s) involved; but many will often refuse even that as they take pride in helping a service member subjected to an illegal and unfair action. Don't mess with veterans!
@@MarLin.- It is odd for sure. When my hubby's grandmother died while we were in Italy, the red Cross had someone there to notify him the very next day. A few years later it was his Uncle and we were Stateside at the time assigned to White Sands in AZ; so no excuse for being overseas. His parents (all happening in OH, so not exactly next door) reached out to us by phone the same day (a traffic accident). But the "official" notification didn't happen until almost 2 weeks later when we'd returned from his emergency leave for the funeral. He did ask as to why the late notice but never got a straight answer. The "funny" part of it was his captain asked him if wanted more emergency leave to go home for the funeral, and an advance on his pay to cover plane tickets! He passed on that as we'd just gotten back 2 days earlier.
Yeah the first story, I get it’s their land and can do anything they want with it, but these neighbors were willing to pay and fix any damage caused. I get they want to be alone, I get it’s their land, and they can celebrate the holidays however they want to but it just seems a bit assholish to say no even when upfront offered compensation. OP loses nothing.
As the narrator said, it was OP's land and it's none of the neighbor's business as to what he does or does not do with his property. Furthermore, how it upset the plans of the neighbor's relatives is none of OP's business. Trying to guilt-trip OP due to the holidays that he doesn't celebrate is just being desperate. She should have accepted it. And there's no guarantee the neighbor would have kept her promise to pay for damages. Best not to let them park in the first place
@@Animeaddiction just because hes in the right legally, doesn't mean hes in the right morally. Helping your neighbors when you can is one of the most basic of basics in terms of morals. It's on the far end of his property, so he wouldn't be disturbed and they were willing to pay him on top of promising to fix any damage. OP was just being meiserly.
There's also the off chance of something happening to the vehicles while on OP's land, making them responsible for it Since rain was mentioned, they could have also gotten stuck in the mud and needing to be towed - again at OP's cost.
@@Ragetiger1 presumably if they were willing to pay and even make repairs then they would brush off any towing, even still it was indicated the yard was being maintained and the parking just tore up the neighbors yard no one got stuck. Again I even reiterated that yes this is OP’s property they can do whatever they want with it, but I have the right to also call them an ass for rejecting what seemed like a mostly net positive arrangement.
@@TheMightySceptile you saw what happened to the neighbor's yard. OP knew that would happen to his yard if he let them park there. Again, he has no guarantee that the neighbors would pay. Again, the moral dilemma is none of OP's business. Why not have the relatives park their cars in a nearby paid parking lot and carpool to the neighbor's home? Using the 'have a heart' is nothing but a guilt-trip tactic. The reason why OP bought the two lots was to keep things quiet. Having several cars park there and people going back and forth is going to ruin that, not to mention ruin the yard. You might see it as being an a-hole, but you have to be more pragmatic and respect his boundaries.
Second Karen in as many days I heard a Karen stole land after a death to build homes. But the other was on a larger scale Op’s grandpa died and gave op the huge property. Op lived in another country. Couldn’t go to properly for years (like around 20). He gets a letter from hoa to stop staking claim to it. They took it, paid property taxes and built 100 homes…aka an enter community Op went there and saw it was true. Been there for years. Families, kids, streets Took more years to get land back (proven hoa bribed people to get land). Op got millions, 100 households lost their homes (most got compensated) and hoa got prison and to demolish entire community
Last story didn't happen. the ruling wouldn't have just been to give back the land it would have included massive payment for damages as well as restoration of the land to prior state
I stand at "Parade Rest" like you. Having been a Chauffer, black suit, white shirt Grey tie, and black trench coat in Winter. I can relate-- Printers alley (Nashville Tennessee) private concert by Rascle Flatts the people trying to get in thought I was SECURITY---oh some ladies made Offers to gain interest.
Last story was NOT realistic. Anyone that has served in the military knows that they will be notified upon the death of a relative that close. Emergency Leave is asked by the Chaplains and automatically granted. Service member is home within 72 hrs.
Just remember that the house was in the mother's name, not OP's at the time. Now, naturally when the parent dies, if there is no will, then all assets and properties would have automatically been granted to the child. Since OP was out of the country at the time, so it was difficult for the attorney to contact him. What Karen did was completely illegal and I was not surprised that she had some corrupted officials who sanctioned the buyout. As for being notified of his mother's death, that can take days or even weeks. Now if the service member dies overseas, then the immediate family is contacted very quickly.
Notification would require someone to tell the military that the loved one had died. Maybe no one took up that task or the Karen told everyone that she would do it, then proceeded to defraud the OP out of his inheritance.
I've got mixed feelings about the first story (car parking). It would have been kind to let them use them for the Holidays but we all know that there are people who'll take your inch and take a mile.
Exactly. OP had no guarantee they'd pay for all damages after seeing the neighbor's lawn. It's OP's property. What he does and does not do with it is his business.
I mean the neighbor at least offered to pay I mean most of these guys just take it and they don't even you know thank him or acknowledge their neighbors for letting him do something like that. Also you could have always had a contract signed to ensure that they wouldn't fall back on their promise of the land being destroyed. Also is anybody ever heard of carpooling ever?
@@KiEntertainer Yeah sounds like he's the entitled guy, I mean u Don't need to be best friends with your neighbors but it's good to be on friendly terms with them.
@@richewilson6394 He bought the land for a specific purpose. He was keeping it for that purpose. It’s HIS land. They could have made other arrangements just like billions of other people around the world manage to do for family events. 🙄
Story 1: The guy was definitely not a good neighbour. In fact he is a selfish dusch! One day he will need something from his neighbours... and will be shocked when they deny him!
Parking on unused land story: It's OP's land, he can do what he wishes with it. But I think I'd investigate putting up fences and a gate around the unused portion of the property with no trespassing signs, because I suspect the neighbor is likely to do something everyone is going to regret otherwise. While it's been a good long while since I've been to a high-end shoe store, I do remember the salesmen in them wearing suits. Most places nowadays staff just wear a uniform polo shirt. Flex hours story: HR isn't there to protect the employees, it's there to protect the company. But THEY absolutely need to know the rules and abide by them. Last story: I'm very surprised that OP wasn't informed of his mother's death as her closest living relative and granted compassionate emergency leave to arrange the funeral of his mother. This alone would have stopped Karen in her tracks. Something feels off about this story.
The parking on unused land dude sounds like a total jerk. "I don't celebrate holidays! I don't care about nobody!" Yes, yes, I know it's his land. That's not the issue. The issue is, he's a jerk.
@@academyofshem No he’s not. Once he agrees to one thing it becomes more and more and then suddenly they’re building a house on his land because “you weren’t using it”. It never stops.
Good morning, RW and all! Yes, you were within your rights, you don't know if their word is any good. All great stories, thank you for sharing! I'm going shopping, so I'll catch you later when I can! Have a great day!
What would life be like for a Karen in jail? Probably not good if she tried her Karen crap on other inmates and even worse if she played those games with the prison staff. . . guards, warden, etc.
The Amazon one, y is should have sued if they kept doin that. It would have brought their illegal activities to light. Also record ANY meeting with HR. It’s for YOUR protection.
This neighbour should understand no manes no. This neighbour knew their grass up and didn’t their but she didn’t her care about grass because she care about neighbours grass .
1-I'd install camera's and fencing. They don't have to park just in front of their house they can park on both sides of the street. 2-Unless it's a sweet little old lady who graciously asked for your help, NOPE! I'd have put her shoes back on the rack or someplace close by. I'm petty like that. 3-Nice! 4-If this was a true story and it had been me, Karen would have died on her steps the day I returned home.
First story. Yes. OP has every right to refuse tonlet his neighbours park their cars on Christmas Day. If your community is anything like mine, exercising that right arbitrarily means your neighbours wull exercise their right to consider you a selfish a-hole. It'll severely inpact your inclusion in the community. It doesn't sound like OP cares about community, though. Fair enough.
When a homeowner dies, the property is immediately given to any surviving heirs. Karen knew about the owner's son and therefore shouldn't have even be given a chance to buy the land. She should be in jail for inheritance theft.
Amazon started in WA, I can not believe they have flex time in other states. They would never get away with flex time in WA. You'll need to post the schedule one week before the first date, it then can't be changed without the worker's permission. It is basically an anti-slavery law. I thought it was Federal but I know it is at least state law.
You need to report that HR lady to her boss. If the company has policies like that but HR people like her blatantly ignore them, she is the reason why Amazon has a reputation for being such a horrible workplace. And I think being able to find quality employees that are willing to work for the company when it needs them is more important than keeping a b**** of an HR lady on staff.
sharing with neighbours is necessary because you have a duty to members of your community, in return for them looking after you - and they offered to pay huge amount for a little parking.
The HR thing is interesting, HR =Human Resources, when you think about it a business is an entity with generally one goal, make money. How do they do ghat, by using resources, humans are one of said resources there to be used, so logically HR are there to benefit the company
I've been a Christian clergy for 30 years. I generally only wear a clergy collar and jacket for weddings, funerals, and high holy days (Christmas and Easter). (I prefer T-shirt and jeans.) All other Sunday's business casual is covered up by my alb (the robe that some pastors wear, not to be confused with an academic type robe that others wear). One day, after a funeral, I had to stop at a grocery store for some odds and ends for dinner (dressed in my clergy collar and coat), when I hear the classic Karen, "Ahem!" And then, before I could turn around, "I need X. It isn't here. Are there some in the back?" I turned around to apologize to her, but she saw my collar and wilted like a daisy that has seen too much sun, and mumbled, "I'm sorry Father...." I guess what they say is true, clothes make the man.
I'm sorry but what in the world is a "christian clergy"? I've been a christian little over 15 years now and I've never heard of a Christian clergy? A elder yes, a deacon yes, a preacher yes. But not christian clergy. Edit: also christmas isn't holy nor is easter.
@@katebarker5612 Interesting. What is the correct version? The most informal is a, “dog collar.” I anxiously await your response like a puppy on a string. Do you want me to wag my tail for you? Trust me: I have 4 years of undergraduate, 4 years of graduate, and 3 years of doctorate education. (Go ahead and do your own research, I’ll give you head start: Boise State, 1994, Methodist Theological School in Ohio, 1999. Drew University, 2010.) You are an armchair theologian, and I really have no f*s to give especially if you are willing to splice words.
@@katebarker5612 To be fair, clerical collar, clergy collar, and roman collar are all valid descriptions. Not that I'm saying he is or isn't what he claims to be. Also, @aidendaniels4063, I'm not sure what denomination of Christianity you're hailing from. But for Roman Catholics, both Christmas and Easter are holy days of obligation.
You took the boxes from her willingly. You started the whole problem. 😂people are ridiculous. Last story, did OP seriously not get compensation on top of restoring the land?
Very smart for him not to let the neighbors park on his land. You let them do it once all of a sudden they will need to use the land all of the time. Or they claim squatters rights.
Story#1 - Just because you're within your rights, doesn't mean you're right. Draw up a contract, get it notarized and be a good neighbor instead of Ebenezer Scrooge's descendent .
So what's stopping the neighbor from calling her relatives, tell them to come in by plane and have her pick them up, rather than driving to her home with limited parking? Oh right, nothing. OP had no business with the neighbor's family. You should look at this scenario objectively, instead of being a bleeding heart.
@@Animeaddiction How about the fact that 1) she’s hosting, which means tons of work to prepare for guests. 2) there were at least 6 cars meaning a dozen people, no reasonable personal vehicle seats that many. 3) we don’t know where the relatives are coming from, perhaps hours away and/or different directions. Your attitude is what is killing America. If you’re in the US, consider that, if not, stay where you are, we don’t need any more of your kind.
About the first story! I’m with OP and you RedWheel on that one a 100%! It’s OP’s land, his property and his decisions to do whatever he pleases to do on it.
Story 1: You wanna know what? Those people have no right to park on your land. That being said, their offer was more than generous but you decided to be an ass, just for the sake of being an ass. The property they wanted to park on wasn't going to increase the noise level by one decibel but you just wanted to be an ass. Congratulations! Now everybody knows.
First story: OP is, in fact, a nasty neighbour. I have an acreage at the edge of a rural community where the neighbours are closer together and there are few parking spots. With the ditch on my side of the road, parking can be difficult. I also have a second driveway that is only used by my tractor when I want to mow the fields. I am happy to let people park there for overflow situations, and have never had any damage or inconvenience. What I do have is a bunch of neighbours who share venison, elk, prawns, salmon and all kinds of other things they catch, not to mention the number of great parties I have been welcomed to. Sorry, OP, but this old lady thinks you are a complete doofus. If there is ever a fire I wonder if the Volunteer Fire Department will show up in time to save your house?
Wow that's nice that you would let people completely destroy your lawn.. and I'm sure that their offer of paying you for it you know even though they're complete strangers you've never really talked to them before and you have no idea if they're actually going to repair your damaged lawn which they probably wouldn't is such a good reason to let them do it . AND WTF DOES THE FIRE DEPT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THIS? (Unless the neighbors are INDEED THE FIRE DEPT...THIS COMMENT IS JUST A LEFT FIELD JUSTIFICATION THAT MAKES NO SENSE IN HELL..STOP IT ) IT'S THE OP'S LAND PLAIN AND SIMPLE, JUST BECAUSE YOU'RE SUCH A SAINTLY NEIGHBOR ,DON'T PUT OTHER PEOPLE ON YOUR LEVEL OF WHAT YOU THINK IS "RIGHT". IF YOU WANT TO LET OTHER PEOPLE TAKE ADVANTAGE OF YOU THAT'S FINE AND GOOD, BUT OTHER PEOPLE'S PROBLEMS ARE NOT OP'S PROBLEMS. HE LITERALLY SAID THEY DESTROYED THEIR LAWN COMPLETELY AND THEY WANTED MORE PEOPLE TO COME THEN THEY HAD FOR THANKSGIVING SO WE DON'T KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE GOING TO SHOW UP AND COMPLETELY DESTROY HIS PROPERTY AND JUST A LITTLE VERBAL "OH WE'LL FIX IT"??? JUST A BIT OF ADVICE "OLD LADY" , IF YOU CAN'T FIND THE ENTITLED " WELL ITS NOT LIKE YOUR EVEN USING YOUR LAND, SO YOU SHOULD JUST LET ME USE IT" KAREN IN THE ROOM ..... IT'S YOU.
Bet he has lots of friends, being such a good person and all. If he goes away for vaca/job & a break in occurs, neighbors will see and do nothing. House smoking? Water leaking out front door? Nope, not helping. Considerate neighbors can benefit both sides, this was a small ask.
Wow, that first story the Op is a dick.So are you Redwheel for the way you answered. What would it hurt to allow them to park on land you're not using for a couple of weeks during the holidays. And they're even willing to pay. Does the Op have to allow it? No. But for God's sake, be a human being.
While the title says "EntitledPeople" and there are lots of those. Clearly, the script writer is incompetent. The title is unusually correct this time. Quite often, have to squint to see the title story or title story just isn't there. This time, the title story is quite clearly the last one.
If you watch the very beginning of the video when the hand draws out what kind of stories will be in this video, it clearly says malicious compliance. 0:04
for the last story forget getting a regular lawyer I myself would have gotten JAG involved in that shit let's see how karen likes dealing with military lawyers
![OsamaSon - ik what you did last summer [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4DIQDnu3mr4/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm finding that last story a bit odd. A mother dies in a tragic accident and the son doesn't find out until he returns from deployment? And between those two points, a third party had the time to forge up documents, complete land transactions, and hire builders? For the first part, I call BS. There's no way that the police wouldn't be able to find the OP as next of kin, and would have notified him through his command. That command would have immediately given the OP an emergency leave and they would have been home within about 72 hours.
I agree totally. A simple title search plus a look at bank records to see if any money had changed hands would have been enough evidence. That eye witness stuff is complete BS and inadmissible in court. Anyone who waves a bit of paper and says "I have the deeds" should be laughed at and so should any story that claims someone forged the documents. The title deed documents you have of your house are simply your copy of the real deeds that are held by your town hall or county recorder's office and they would be alot harder to change.
Smells like fish left out for a few days in the sun...
Not only was the sale of that house illegal, but i'm pretty sure that it is a federal crime because the rightful owner of the home, after the mother passed, was on military leave
Yes, under the GI bill.
Not leave. It’s the deployed military personnel protection federal law. It’s s federal felony, punishable by a lot of time in a federal prison.
And on top of that the whole story has all the feel of a middle school kid's creative writing exersize.
Military duty, but yes.
@@rossbrumby1957 A lot of these stories have that feel. That or a wannabe writer honing his skills/style on Reddit.
In the last/title story, if the OP was/is still on Active Duty. They should have gotten JAG involved.
Last story: so did you go after hrler for everything that was in your house that she had demolished?! Probably kept the furniture and other good stuff. Also, from the bank, your lawyer could had easily shown no record of payment for the house and land.
I was wondering about all of the belongings also.
In regard to the last story about the veteran, here in the US there are federal laws protecting the assets (land, houses, cars, trucks, and so forth) of all active-duty personnel from all kinds of actions. Not only huge fines are involved, but also jail time depending on what the offender did, value of the asset(s) and so-on. Over the years this has tripped up many greedy parties, from landlords, to spouses or other family members, as you can imagine. Most active duty are aware of these laws, as they are usually briefed on them not only when deployed but also on rotating back State-side with briefing paperwork containing details of whatever legal service that member has available to them. Depending on their branch of service and where they were activated from, this legal service could be run by their branch of service; or - if for example they were in a reserve unit - lawyers in their area may volunteer for their service. Civilian lawyers do qualify for a reasonable payment from the federal gov., usually tied again back to the value of the asset(s) involved; but many will often refuse even that as they take pride in helping a service member subjected to an illegal and unfair action. Don't mess with veterans!
The story is complete BS. They would have notified him of the death of his mother for a start.
@@MarLin.- It is odd for sure. When my hubby's grandmother died while we were in Italy, the red Cross had someone there to notify him the very next day. A few years later it was his Uncle and we were Stateside at the time assigned to White Sands in AZ; so no excuse for being overseas. His parents (all happening in OH, so not exactly next door) reached out to us by phone the same day (a traffic accident). But the "official" notification didn't happen until almost 2 weeks later when we'd returned from his emergency leave for the funeral. He did ask as to why the late notice but never got a straight answer. The "funny" part of it was his captain asked him if wanted more emergency leave to go home for the funeral, and an advance on his pay to cover plane tickets! He passed on that as we'd just gotten back 2 days earlier.
On the last story, great job op, that karen DESERVED jail, actually she DESERVES prison time.
Yeah the first story, I get it’s their land and can do anything they want with it, but these neighbors were willing to pay and fix any damage caused.
I get they want to be alone, I get it’s their land, and they can celebrate the holidays however they want to but it just seems a bit assholish to say no even when upfront offered compensation. OP loses nothing.
As the narrator said, it was OP's land and it's none of the neighbor's business as to what he does or does not do with his property. Furthermore, how it upset the plans of the neighbor's relatives is none of OP's business. Trying to guilt-trip OP due to the holidays that he doesn't celebrate is just being desperate. She should have accepted it. And there's no guarantee the neighbor would have kept her promise to pay for damages. Best not to let them park in the first place
@@Animeaddiction just because hes in the right legally, doesn't mean hes in the right morally.
Helping your neighbors when you can is one of the most basic of basics in terms of morals. It's on the far end of his property, so he wouldn't be disturbed and they were willing to pay him on top of promising to fix any damage. OP was just being meiserly.
There's also the off chance of something happening to the vehicles while on OP's land, making them responsible for it Since rain was mentioned, they could have also gotten stuck in the mud and needing to be towed - again at OP's cost.
@@Ragetiger1 presumably if they were willing to pay and even make repairs then they would brush off any towing, even still it was indicated the yard was being maintained and the parking just tore up the neighbors yard no one got stuck.
Again I even reiterated that yes this is OP’s property they can do whatever they want with it, but I have the right to also call them an ass for rejecting what seemed like a mostly net positive arrangement.
@@TheMightySceptile you saw what happened to the neighbor's yard. OP knew that would happen to his yard if he let them park there. Again, he has no guarantee that the neighbors would pay. Again, the moral dilemma is none of OP's business. Why not have the relatives park their cars in a nearby paid parking lot and carpool to the neighbor's home? Using the 'have a heart' is nothing but a guilt-trip tactic.
The reason why OP bought the two lots was to keep things quiet. Having several cars park there and people going back and forth is going to ruin that, not to mention ruin the yard.
You might see it as being an a-hole, but you have to be more pragmatic and respect his boundaries.
Second Karen in as many days I heard a Karen stole land after a death to build homes. But the other was on a larger scale
Op’s grandpa died and gave op the huge property. Op lived in another country. Couldn’t go to properly for years (like around 20). He gets a letter from hoa to stop staking claim to it. They took it, paid property taxes and built 100 homes…aka an enter community
Op went there and saw it was true. Been there for years. Families, kids, streets
Took more years to get land back (proven hoa bribed people to get land). Op got millions, 100 households lost their homes (most got compensated) and hoa got prison and to demolish entire community
That was on ripe
Last story didn't happen.
the ruling wouldn't have just been to give back the land it would have included massive payment for damages as well as restoration of the land to prior state
I stand at "Parade Rest" like you. Having been a Chauffer, black suit, white shirt Grey tie, and black trench coat in Winter. I can relate--
Printers alley (Nashville Tennessee) private concert by Rascle Flatts the people trying to get in thought I was SECURITY---oh some ladies made Offers to gain interest.
Last story was NOT realistic. Anyone that has served in the military knows that they will be notified upon the death of a relative that close. Emergency Leave is asked by the Chaplains and automatically granted. Service member is home within 72 hrs.
Just remember that the house was in the mother's name, not OP's at the time. Now, naturally when the parent dies, if there is no will, then all assets and properties would have automatically been granted to the child. Since OP was out of the country at the time, so it was difficult for the attorney to contact him. What Karen did was completely illegal and I was not surprised that she had some corrupted officials who sanctioned the buyout.
As for being notified of his mother's death, that can take days or even weeks. Now if the service member dies overseas, then the immediate family is contacted very quickly.
Also an immense exaggeration/fabrication from the legal aspects.
Notification would require someone to tell the military that the loved one had died. Maybe no one took up that task or the Karen told everyone that she would do it, then proceeded to defraud the OP out of his inheritance.
Happy Monday RedWheel hope you are well. Thanks for sharing. Please stay safe.🏴😁😷👍. Have a great day and a wonderful week ahead everyone
You have a great day to!
2nd!🧡🍒✌️
Good morning everyone and RedWheel 😊
Hope everyone has a great day 😊
Good morning, hope you have great day also!
1st! 💜🍰✌️
I've got mixed feelings about the first story (car parking). It would have been kind to let them use them for the Holidays but we all know that there are people who'll take your inch and take a mile.
Exactly. OP had no guarantee they'd pay for all damages after seeing the neighbor's lawn. It's OP's property. What he does and does not do with it is his business.
Mine was the 420th like, how appropriate. 🤣
I mean the neighbor at least offered to pay I mean most of these guys just take it and they don't even you know thank him or acknowledge their neighbors for letting him do something like that. Also you could have always had a contract signed to ensure that they wouldn't fall back on their promise of the land being destroyed.
Also is anybody ever heard of carpooling ever?
Carpooling?
Isn't that the planet in the next Galaxy over 😂😂😂
Really don’t like the op in story 1, he just sounds super miserable.
I was also thinking a contract
@@KiEntertainer Yeah sounds like he's the entitled guy, I mean u Don't need to be best friends with your neighbors but it's good to be on friendly terms with them.
@@richewilson6394 He bought the land for a specific purpose. He was keeping it for that purpose. It’s HIS land. They could have made other arrangements just like billions of other people around the world manage to do for family events. 🙄
@@KiEntertainerso you don't like the op just because you don't like him... God your such an amazing judge of character 😂
"...since the panini started..."
omg, autocorrect screws with everyone...
Story 1: The guy was definitely not a good neighbour. In fact he is a selfish dusch! One day he will need something from his neighbours... and will be shocked when they deny him!
Parking on unused land story: It's OP's land, he can do what he wishes with it. But I think I'd investigate putting up fences and a gate around the unused portion of the property with no trespassing signs, because I suspect the neighbor is likely to do something everyone is going to regret otherwise.
While it's been a good long while since I've been to a high-end shoe store, I do remember the salesmen in them wearing suits. Most places nowadays staff just wear a uniform polo shirt.
Flex hours story: HR isn't there to protect the employees, it's there to protect the company. But THEY absolutely need to know the rules and abide by them.
Last story: I'm very surprised that OP wasn't informed of his mother's death as her closest living relative and granted compassionate emergency leave to arrange the funeral of his mother. This alone would have stopped Karen in her tracks. Something feels off about this story.
The parking on unused land dude sounds like a total jerk. "I don't celebrate holidays! I don't care about nobody!"
Yes, yes, I know it's his land. That's not the issue. The issue is, he's a jerk.
@@academyofshem No he’s not. Once he agrees to one thing it becomes more and more and then suddenly they’re building a house on his land because “you weren’t using it”. It never stops.
@@MarLin.- Yes, he is. Total jerk. Quit trying to put a spin on it
@@academyofshemno he's not. Your just spoiled and think your entitled to other peoples property 😂
@@academyofshem Type of person dies alone and isn't found for months. Because no one likes them. Therefore no one visits him.
Good morning, RW and all! Yes, you were within your rights, you don't know if their word is any good. All great stories, thank you for sharing! I'm going shopping, so I'll catch you later when I can! Have a great day!
👋Good morning, Loretta, I got to sleep in today! Woohoo! No traffic for me for me today. Have fun shopping! 💜🥰🤗✌️
What would life be like for a Karen in jail? Probably not good if she tried her Karen crap on other inmates and even worse if she played those games with the prison staff. . . guards, warden, etc.
HR managers are like high school Guidance Counselors. They pick an employee/student and make their life hell.
The Amazon one, y is should have sued if they kept doin that. It would have brought their illegal activities to light. Also record ANY meeting with HR. It’s for YOUR protection.
This neighbour should understand no manes no. This neighbour knew their grass up and didn’t their but she didn’t her care about grass because she care about neighbours grass .
1-I'd install camera's and fencing. They don't have to park just in front of their house they can park on both sides of the street. 2-Unless it's a sweet little old lady who graciously asked for your help, NOPE! I'd have put her shoes back on the rack or someplace close by. I'm petty like that. 3-Nice! 4-If this was a true story and it had been me, Karen would have died on her steps the day I returned home.
On the first story, I'd have let them park but at the same time it's 100% OP's right to say no
First story. Yes. OP has every right to refuse tonlet his neighbours park their cars on Christmas Day. If your community is anything like mine, exercising that right arbitrarily means your neighbours wull exercise their right to consider you a selfish a-hole. It'll severely inpact your inclusion in the community. It doesn't sound like OP cares about community, though. Fair enough.
When a homeowner dies, the property is immediately given to any surviving heirs. Karen knew about the owner's son and therefore shouldn't have even be given a chance to buy the land. She should be in jail for inheritance theft.
Amazon started in WA, I can not believe they have flex time in other states. They would never get away with flex time in WA. You'll need to post the schedule one week before the first date, it then can't be changed without the worker's permission. It is basically an anti-slavery law. I thought it was Federal but I know it is at least state law.
You need to report that HR lady to her boss. If the company has policies like that but HR people like her blatantly ignore them, she is the reason why Amazon has a reputation for being such a horrible workplace. And I think being able to find quality employees that are willing to work for the company when it needs them is more important than keeping a b**** of an HR lady on staff.
🔥🔥🔥
12m30s should have gotten JAG lawyers in.
sharing with neighbours is necessary because you have a duty to members of your community, in return for them looking after you - and they offered to pay huge amount for a little parking.
K, but op specifically wants to be left alone. And karen needs to learn to accept that.
The last one, you should have also sued her for slander for callin you what she did.
Concerning that first story, “good fences make good neighbors”
you are a jerk. being a good neighbor is more important than whateve selfish excus you have
Hanging out with the dogs outside smoking my pipe, drinking coffee and listening to Red.... Perfection!
The HR thing is interesting, HR =Human Resources, when you think about it a business is an entity with generally one goal, make money. How do they do ghat, by using resources, humans are one of said resources there to be used, so logically HR are there to benefit the company
I've been a Christian clergy for 30 years. I generally only wear a clergy collar and jacket for weddings, funerals, and high holy days (Christmas and Easter). (I prefer T-shirt and jeans.) All other Sunday's business casual is covered up by my alb (the robe that some pastors wear, not to be confused with an academic type robe that others wear). One day, after a funeral, I had to stop at a grocery store for some odds and ends for dinner (dressed in my clergy collar and coat), when I hear the classic Karen, "Ahem!" And then, before I could turn around, "I need X. It isn't here. Are there some in the back?" I turned around to apologize to her, but she saw my collar and wilted like a daisy that has seen too much sun, and mumbled, "I'm sorry Father...." I guess what they say is true, clothes make the man.
I'm sorry but what in the world is a "christian clergy"? I've been a christian little over 15 years now and I've never heard of a Christian clergy? A elder yes, a deacon yes, a preacher yes. But not christian clergy.
Edit: also christmas isn't holy nor is easter.
.A real clergyman would know the correct name for a clerical collar. If you're going to make stuff up then at least do a better job than this.
@@katebarker5612 Interesting. What is the correct version? The most informal is a, “dog collar.” I anxiously await your response like a puppy on a string. Do you want me to wag my tail for you? Trust me: I have 4 years of undergraduate, 4 years of graduate, and 3 years of doctorate education. (Go ahead and do your own research, I’ll give you head start: Boise State, 1994, Methodist Theological School in Ohio, 1999. Drew University, 2010.) You are an armchair theologian, and I really have no f*s to give especially if you are willing to splice words.
Facebook thinks that calling someone stupid with a three syllable word is inappropriate. So, let's keep to KISS. You, are dumb.
@@katebarker5612 To be fair, clerical collar, clergy collar, and roman collar are all valid descriptions. Not that I'm saying he is or isn't what he claims to be. Also, @aidendaniels4063, I'm not sure what denomination of Christianity you're hailing from. But for Roman Catholics, both Christmas and Easter are holy days of obligation.
HR ( Human Resources) is not there to help you. They are there to cover the company and make sure they don’t get sued.
You took the boxes from her willingly. You started the whole problem. 😂people are ridiculous.
Last story, did OP seriously not get compensation on top of restoring the land?
On the first story, op your land your property.
Very smart for him not to let the neighbors park on his land. You let them do it once all of a sudden they will need to use the land all of the time. Or they claim squatters rights.
Story#1 - Just because you're within your rights, doesn't mean you're right. Draw up a contract, get it notarized and be a good neighbor instead of Ebenezer Scrooge's descendent .
So what's stopping the neighbor from calling her relatives, tell them to come in by plane and have her pick them up, rather than driving to her home with limited parking? Oh right, nothing.
OP had no business with the neighbor's family. You should look at this scenario objectively, instead of being a bleeding heart.
@@Animeaddiction How about the fact that 1) she’s hosting, which means tons of work to prepare for guests. 2) there were at least 6 cars meaning a dozen people, no reasonable personal vehicle seats that many. 3) we don’t know where the relatives are coming from, perhaps hours away and/or different directions. Your attitude is what is killing America. If you’re in the US, consider that, if not, stay where you are, we don’t need any more of your kind.
About the first story! I’m with OP and you RedWheel on that one a 100%! It’s OP’s land, his property and his decisions to do whatever he pleases to do on it.
HR is there to protect the company, not the employee. DOn't trust HR.
Hi all 👋👋
If you let someone use your land for parking once… everyone that sees that decides they have the right to park there too. I would say NO NO NO HELL NO
HR is for the company. F hr
Story 1: You wanna know what? Those people have no right to park on your land. That being said, their offer was more than generous but you decided to be an ass, just for the sake of being an ass. The property they wanted to park on wasn't going to increase the noise level by one decibel but you just wanted to be an ass. Congratulations! Now everybody knows.
Wait a minute - in the Amazon story - the HR person left?!? Amazon is famous for firing people who make waves.,
First story: OP is, in fact, a nasty neighbour. I have an acreage at the edge of a rural community where the neighbours are closer together and there are few parking spots. With the ditch on my side of the road, parking can be difficult. I also have a second driveway that is only used by my tractor when I want to mow the fields.
I am happy to let people park there for overflow situations, and have never had any damage or inconvenience. What I do have is a bunch of neighbours who share venison, elk, prawns, salmon and all kinds of other things they catch, not to mention the number of great parties I have been welcomed to.
Sorry, OP, but this old lady thinks you are a complete doofus. If there is ever a fire I wonder if the Volunteer Fire Department will show up in time to save your house?
Wow that's nice that you would let people completely destroy your lawn.. and I'm sure that their offer of paying you for it you know even though they're complete strangers you've never really talked to them before and you have no idea if they're actually going to repair your damaged lawn which they probably wouldn't is such a good reason to let them do it . AND WTF DOES THE FIRE DEPT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THIS? (Unless the neighbors are INDEED THE FIRE DEPT...THIS COMMENT IS JUST A LEFT FIELD JUSTIFICATION THAT MAKES NO SENSE IN HELL..STOP IT )
IT'S THE OP'S LAND PLAIN AND SIMPLE,
JUST BECAUSE YOU'RE SUCH A SAINTLY NEIGHBOR ,DON'T PUT OTHER PEOPLE ON YOUR LEVEL OF WHAT YOU THINK IS "RIGHT".
IF YOU WANT TO LET OTHER PEOPLE TAKE ADVANTAGE OF YOU THAT'S FINE AND GOOD, BUT OTHER PEOPLE'S PROBLEMS ARE NOT OP'S PROBLEMS. HE LITERALLY SAID THEY DESTROYED THEIR LAWN COMPLETELY AND THEY WANTED MORE PEOPLE TO COME THEN THEY HAD FOR THANKSGIVING SO WE DON'T KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE GOING TO SHOW UP AND COMPLETELY DESTROY HIS PROPERTY AND JUST A LITTLE VERBAL "OH WE'LL FIX IT"???
JUST A BIT OF ADVICE "OLD LADY" , IF YOU CAN'T FIND THE ENTITLED " WELL ITS NOT LIKE YOUR EVEN USING YOUR LAND, SO YOU SHOULD JUST LET ME USE IT" KAREN IN THE ROOM ..... IT'S YOU.
It’s his land yes but he sounds like a bitter old.
First OP kinda sounds like a scrooge ngl. Like hes technically in the right legally, but that doesnt mean hes in the right morally
Bet he has lots of friends, being such a good person and all. If he goes away for vaca/job & a break in occurs, neighbors will see and do nothing. House smoking? Water leaking out front door? Nope, not helping.
Considerate neighbors can benefit both sides, this was a small ask.
Sounds like a asshole
Last story was a steaming pile of lies. The author never served in the military or would have actually been familiar with their policies.
Parking story. Poor planning on Karen's part does not constitute an emergency on Op.
Wow, that first story the Op is a dick.So are you Redwheel for the way you answered. What would it hurt to allow them to park on land you're not using for a couple of weeks during the holidays. And they're even willing to pay. Does the Op have to allow it? No. But for God's sake, be a human being.
This page just ripped off reddit
The first guy is just being an a$$hole.
There is zero malicious compliance in any of these stories…. Don’t bother watching this video if that’s why you came here.
While the title says "EntitledPeople" and there are lots of those. Clearly, the script writer is incompetent. The title is unusually correct this time. Quite often, have to squint to see the title story or title story just isn't there. This time, the title story is quite clearly the last one.
If you watch the very beginning of the video when the hand draws out what kind of stories will be in this video, it clearly says malicious compliance. 0:04
for the last story forget getting a regular lawyer I myself would have gotten JAG involved in that shit let's see how karen likes dealing with military lawyers
I hate it when a panini happens!🫣